ykarel | iurygregory, rpittau can you check/clear https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/934476 | 05:57 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/releases master: DNM: testing CI on Noble https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936326 | 07:55 |
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/releases master: Fix tox validate environment for Ubuntu 24.04 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936426 | 07:55 |
frickler | release-team: ^^ that simple fix should make us ready for noble. also please check https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22antelope-eol-retired%22 so we can continue with the other eol things on top of that | 07:57 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Move kuryr-kubernetes Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936355 | 09:37 |
elodilles | thanks frickler o/ | 09:39 |
frickler | elodilles: thx for the update. would you consider self-approving that stack or should I rather do some more nagging to the other releasers? (or I could single-approve I guess) | 09:52 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Fix tox validate environment for Ubuntu 24.04 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936426 | 10:00 |
ttx | Looking into it | 10:33 |
ttx | frickler: all set | 10:37 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Move ec2-api Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936352 | 10:42 |
frickler | ty | 10:43 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Move murano Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936358 | 10:44 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Move sahara Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936372 | 10:45 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Move senlin Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936373 | 10:45 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Move solum Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936374 | 10:46 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Move winstackers Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936376 | 10:48 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Move kuryr-kubernetes Unmaintained series to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936355 | 10:48 |
frickler | elodilles: I could run the branch cleanup script now, would give you time to update the next stack? ;) it does rebase cleanly onto master fwiw | 11:01 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release telemetry-tempest-plugin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936192 | 11:36 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Update OSA roles repository list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936336 | 11:36 |
elodilles | frickler: thanks, please run the script then! o:) | 11:55 |
elodilles | frickler: i actually wonder if that were all the retired project? i mean, i aimed to move to EOL all retired projects' unmaintained branches, but for that i used the ones where there were no PTL or release liaison mentioned. and now i realized that monasca and freezer were not among them. are those retired or marked as inactive, too? | 12:04 |
frickler | elodilles: those are still inactive, but I guess this is a good time to reconsider their status, see governance/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst | 12:13 |
frickler | looking at this I think eoling 2023.1 or older would still seem appropriate https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/monasca-api+status:open+owner:infra-root@openstack.org | 12:16 |
frickler | freezer is looking better at first sight at least, maybe make a "normal" transition patch for it and see what noonedeadpunk says about it? | 12:19 |
* frickler needs to take a break, will run the script afterwards | 12:20 | |
noonedeadpunk | both freezer and monasca are inactive | 12:26 |
noonedeadpunk | they were not retired so far | 12:27 |
noonedeadpunk | I kind of hope to find time to work on freezer a bit more this cycle to get it back on rails for the active state... | 12:27 |
noonedeadpunk | monasca was discussed to get back to active last cycle iirc, but they've landed fixes too late. If I'm not mixing up cycles/projects in my head.... | 12:28 |
elodilles | ACK, thanks for the info, both of you o/ | 12:31 |
elodilles | i guess then we can continue with the "normal" transition for now. but i think i'll propose EOL patches for their old Unmaintained branches. | 12:33 |
ykarel | elodilles, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/934476 should be ok now, have ptl approved | 13:52 |
elodilles | ykarel: looking | 13:52 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [OpenStack-Ansible Roles] Create Dalmatian branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936353 | 14:06 |
elodilles | ykarel: +2'd it | 14:12 |
frickler | elodilles: ok, so ... it looks like we have two issues: a) the eol script doesn't deal with 2023.1 while is it still marked as maintained. I think I could override locally to proceed with that? | 14:36 |
frickler | b) iiuc the script only checks for stable/* and not for eoled unmaintained/* branches? | 14:36 |
frickler | only deleted two stable/zed branches in the current state | 14:37 |
frickler | I'll look at fixing b) first now | 14:37 |
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/releases master: Update tooling to delete unmaintained branches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936637 | 15:42 |
frickler | ^^ that might be rewritten more efficiently, but it is doing its job for me now. and found that most of the stale branches still have open reviews that need to be abandoned first :-/ | 15:44 |
frickler | first bunch done https://paste.opendev.org/show/biW8N18YUhHNfVCcoFnl/ , next up looking to abandon stuff | 16:19 |
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/releases master: Update tooling to delete unmaintained branches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/936637 | 17:01 |
frickler | fwiw, all reviews abandoned by ^^ were bot-generated. running the second round of branch deletions now | 17:06 |
elodilles | frickler: ah, damn... :S thanks for updating the script. i'll review the patch. and of course: thanks for dealing with the deletions as well o/ | 17:15 |
frickler | second batch, total of 105 deleted branches. also 3 puppet branches with commits after eol, will take another look tomorrow https://paste.opendev.org/show/bfwUL87rox1zHfUO5AsA/ | 18:30 |
sean-k-mooney | elodilles: i did everything correctly you shoudl now have review rights as a stable maint member on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/934996 care to take another look when you have time | 18:36 |
sean-k-mooney | im still in the process of creating the serise in launchpad for the stabel branches but the openstack bot is already working on master again which is nice | 18:39 |
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/releases master: [kolla] Transition 2023.1 Antelope to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/934490 | 18:59 |
sean-k-mooney | how is ^ going in general | 19:00 |
frickler | sean-k-mooney: you mean https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22antelope-unmaintained%22+status:open ? some late stragglers and kind of the usual suspects of non-responders, I'd say | 19:06 |
sean-k-mooney | that and the transtion of the older releases to eol | 19:06 |
sean-k-mooney | outside of some heroics by elodilles and a select few | 19:07 |
sean-k-mooney | i think for the most part we are not seeign anyoen actully step up to look after the unmtiantained branches | 19:07 |
frickler | I agree, my personal opinion is to consider the experiment failed, delete all unmaintained branches and get back to just eol-ing after 18 months. but I know elodilles doesn't agree to that ;) | 19:09 |
sean-k-mooney | thanks for propsoign https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22eom-to-eol%22 by the way | 19:09 |
sean-k-mooney | well i htink we just need to get better at reapign them. | 19:10 |
sean-k-mooney | bobcat is not elagiable for unmainted status | 19:10 |
frickler | yes, that will be easy | 19:10 |
sean-k-mooney | and if there are no commits on unmainteined/2023.1 at that point i would reap them on the relevent proejcts too | 19:10 |
sean-k-mooney | i have said this before. i kind of wish we worked more like the kernel. have short release cycle of 6-12 weeks, pick specific one each year to supprot as an lts version and supprot that for 2 years | 19:13 |
sean-k-mooney | still ill take 6 mounth release upstream any day over a release eery 2 years downstream | 19:14 |
frickler | sean-k-mooney: the actual commits being done is a good metric IMO, like https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:unmaintained/victoria+-owner:infra-root@openstack.org shows about 70 commits on half as many repos. I would be fine with keeping those open and closing everything else | 19:14 |
sean-k-mooney | ya | 19:15 |
sean-k-mooney | if peopel are actully active on them it does not hurt | 19:15 |
sean-k-mooney | provided you pin the deps to the relevent tags so that you can eol things that are not being maintined | 19:16 |
sean-k-mooney | the new lifecycle fixt a lot of the messaging probelems | 19:16 |
sean-k-mooney | so we are definatly a lot better off then we were before | 19:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!