| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:54 | |
| *** udesale is now known as udesale|holiday | 06:58 | |
| opendevreview | Martin Kopec proposed openstack/releases master: Release devstack-tools 1.2.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808087 | 08:22 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: Cycle With Intermediary Unreleased Ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808186 | 09:11 |
| opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: Release sushy-tools 0.18.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808188 | 09:19 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, hey fyi we are trying to get a few patches in the ironic-python-agent-builder (CI is a bit broken due to Debian) we are trying to fix things to request the release next week | 09:21 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: ack thanks for the heads up | 09:21 |
| iurygregory | np =) | 09:21 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: [FYI] here are a couple of related info: next week will propose releases for deliverables that are "cycle-with-intermediary" and "type:other" (https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#r-3-week-rc1-deadline), that's the case of ironic-python-agent-builder, so that's not too late to merge patches. Also we should notice that IPAB didn't yet received release for | 09:28 |
| hberaud | Xena | 09:28 |
| hberaud | https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/xena/ironic-python-agent-builder.yaml | 09:29 |
| iurygregory | ack o/ | 09:29 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, I'm wondering why https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808186 complains about ironic ui with 4.4.0 | 09:35 |
| iurygregory | in wallaby we have 4.3.0.. | 09:35 |
| * hberaud check | 09:35 | |
| hberaud | iurygregory: it complain because these deliverables are RC deliverables and didn't provided RC1 first/yet | 09:37 |
| *** elodilles_pto is now known as elodilles | 09:37 | |
| hberaud | In other words you couldn't create final release before providing RC | 09:37 |
| hberaud | s/couldn't/can't/ | 09:38 |
| iurygregory | oh | 09:39 |
| iurygregory | so how I handle that ? | 09:39 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: Next week is the RC1 deadline, so we will generate RC patches https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#r-3-week-rc1-deadline | 09:39 |
| iurygregory | need to creat as rc instead of feature? | 09:39 |
| hberaud | and those deliverables will be included | 09:39 |
| hberaud | Well, usually RC start with a major version each cycle | 09:40 |
| iurygregory | oh wow .-. | 09:41 |
| hberaud | and the command to create RC is the same than the command you/we use to create standard release, you just need to select "rc" | 09:41 |
| hberaud | (instead of bugfix, feature, etc...) | 09:41 |
| iurygregory | I see | 09:41 |
| hberaud | lemme give you an example | 09:41 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: https://releases.openstack.org/reference/using.html#using-new-release-command | 09:42 |
| iurygregory | instead of tox -e venv -- new-release xena ironic-ui feature would be tox -e venv -- new-release xena ironic-ui rc | 09:42 |
| hberaud | yes exact | 09:42 |
| iurygregory | I would say a major bump would be a bit too much for projects like ironic-ui ipe where we don't see a lot of changes | 09:44 |
| opendevreview | Martin Kopec proposed openstack/releases master: Release os-testr 2.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808094 | 09:46 |
| opendevreview | Martin Kopec proposed openstack/releases master: Release bashate 2.1.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808086 | 09:47 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: unfortunatelly I don't think that we could bypass this rule at this point https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#services-horizon-plugins-and-other-deliverables Maybe we should think about changing the release model or the deliverable type of these deliverables for Y | 09:47 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, ack | 09:49 |
| iurygregory | I will push with rc in the patch =) | 09:49 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: thanks | 09:49 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, np =) | 09:50 |
| hberaud | indeed you don't have a lot of significant changes, so, yes, I think it's time to start thinking about updating the deliverables type/models for those deliverables | 09:50 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: ^ | 09:50 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: do you will remain release liaison for Y? | 09:51 |
| hberaud | (for ironic) | 09:51 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, yes and I will be the PTL also | 09:51 |
| hberaud | Cool, then I think you need to put this topic on your todo list for Y :) | 09:52 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: Congrats for your PTL role! | 09:52 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, tks! I will add the topic and I will discuss with the community =) | 09:52 |
| hberaud | Excellent! Do not hesitate to ping us if needed | 09:53 |
| iurygregory | sure! | 09:54 |
| opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: RC release for ironic-ui and IPE https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808186 | 09:57 |
| hberaud | elodilles: o/ is it you who deleted the PTL approved badge on this patch? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807615 | 10:35 |
| elodilles | hberaud: nope. I'm not even able to do that, am I? :-o | 10:41 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [manila] Add Xena cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807391 | 10:42 |
| elodilles | sometimes, in rare cases the PTL-approved flag behaves strangly. Usually it just isn't triggered. :S | 10:43 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release devstack-tools 1.2.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808087 | 10:55 |
| hberaud | elodilles: I don't know if we can remove this tag manually, I don't think is it possible. | 11:17 |
| hberaud | apprently zuul removed this badge in this review | 11:17 |
| hberaud | The weird thing is that it was added yesterday when the PTL/liaison validated this patch | 11:18 |
| hberaud | Here it was triggered but it was removed in a second time without specific reason | 11:19 |
| elodilles | (I've checked meanwhile and for PTL-approved flag gerrit says "You don't have permission to edit this label.") | 11:27 |
| hberaud | this is what I was thinking thank for your confirmation | 11:28 |
| elodilles | hberaud: according to this: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2dbae464f15b48f0869917e1cb330796/console | 11:30 |
| elodilles | hberaud: "monasca team does not exist in liaisons file" | 11:31 |
| hberaud | those are juste warning, isn't? | 11:31 |
| elodilles | yes, that's true | 11:31 |
| elodilles | hmmm | 11:31 |
| hberaud | if you look at the history of comments this patches received the badge 4 minutes later than this job | 11:32 |
| hberaud | So I would argue that he worked as expected | 11:33 |
| hberaud | ah sorry I'm bad | 11:34 |
| hberaud | Wrong date conversion on my side | 11:34 |
| elodilles | hberaud: this is the key to our mistery https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/807858 | 11:37 |
| elodilles | :) | 11:37 |
| hberaud | Oh yeah! good catch elodilles | 11:38 |
| elodilles | it was merged yesterday afternoon | 11:38 |
| elodilles | so my comment triggered the check and based on the new data (no PTL) the flag was cleared | 11:39 |
| hberaud | That's a bit annoying... I didn't see this before xena | 11:39 |
| hberaud | Yes | 11:39 |
| elodilles | I guess you haven't met a case where a project was left without a PTL | 11:40 |
| hberaud | So for the current opened patches we should do diligent reviews on this point and consider this side effect too (ttx, smcginnis FYI ^) | 11:40 |
| elodilles | I don't think we will have that many similar issue | 11:41 |
| hberaud | until we approve the other patches no... :) | 11:42 |
| elodilles | this was a 'fortunate' case, where the PTL (for Xena) is still active and voted, but due to the update of the PTL list (when it was merged) his vote does not trigger anymore the PTL-approved flag | 11:45 |
| elodilles | is monasca changing to leaderless model (like Oslo)? | 11:47 |
| hberaud | I don't know | 11:49 |
| hberaud | apparently nope | 11:50 |
| hberaud | else it will be set to "distributed" | 11:50 |
| elodilles | oh, i see. | 11:51 |
| hberaud | (I think) | 11:51 |
| hberaud | #notsure | 11:51 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:13 | |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:14 | |
| ttx | note that I'll multiplex during our meeting so if I'm slow to answer that would be it | 13:28 |
| hberaud | ack | 13:58 |
| hberaud | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Sep 10 14:00:08 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| hberaud | Ping list: elodilles armstrong | 14:00 |
| hberaud | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-relmgt-tracking | 14:00 |
| hberaud | We're way down on line 324 now. | 14:00 |
| hberaud | Will just wait a couple minutes for folks. | 14:00 |
| ttx | o/ | 14:01 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:01 |
| hberaud | #topic Review task completion | 14:03 |
| hberaud | So the 2 main things was | 14:03 |
| hberaud | 1) Propose stable/$series branch creation => https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22xena-stable-branches%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 14:03 |
| hberaud | I think we can trigger the merge for validated and unvalidated patches, and leave only the patch with -1 | 14:04 |
| * hberaud starting the +W session | 14:04 | |
| hberaud | elodilles, ttx: feel free to approve those with only 1 validation from us | 14:05 |
| ttx | ok | 14:07 |
| hberaud | gibi: please can you review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807685 | 14:09 |
| hberaud | ttx, elodilles let's wait a bit for nova | 14:10 |
| elodilles | hberaud: sure | 14:11 |
| gibi | hberaud: I will check quickly | 14:13 |
| hberaud | gibi: thank you | 14:13 |
| hberaud | So I +W all the patches with 2 review from us and I +2'ed those without response. | 14:14 |
| hberaud | Well, we can switch to the second task | 14:14 |
| gibi | hberaud: done, thanks | 14:14 |
| diablo_rojo_phone | o/ | 14:14 |
| hberaud | diablo_rojo_phone: o/ | 14:15 |
| hberaud | gibi: excellent thanks | 14:15 |
| hberaud | so only cyborg remain waiting for an RFE http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/024802.html, if we don't get response from prometheanfire early Monday I'll cut the branch here too and I'll propose to the team to backport their fixes | 14:17 |
| hberaud | So, back to the second task | 14:18 |
| hberaud | it was "List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months" | 14:18 |
| hberaud | and apparently "This did not catch anything that was not already mentioned in http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024534.html" | 14:18 |
| hberaud | thanks ttx and armstrong | 14:18 |
| ttx | np | 14:19 |
| hberaud | #topic Assign R-3 tasks | 14:19 |
| prometheanfire | hberaud: reqs breanches last, generally, so if we are last to branch we could do so now | 14:19 |
| hberaud | yep I know | 14:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: New releases of the Neutron stable versions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808012 | 14:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release os-testr 2.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808094 | 14:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release sushy-tools 0.18.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808188 | 14:20 |
| hberaud | prometheanfire: the question here is about branching cyborg | 14:20 |
| hberaud | They wait for a RFE and the current proposed branching don't take account of that | 14:20 |
| prometheanfire | ah, email wasn't tagged for reqs :P | 14:20 |
| prometheanfire | I don't think the cyborg review requires reqs signoff | 14:21 |
| prometheanfire | well, release does I guess | 14:21 |
| prometheanfire | I think it's fine, I'll email | 14:21 |
| hberaud | thanks | 14:21 |
| hberaud | I'll update the patch after the meeting | 14:22 |
| hberaud | with the new version and the cut based on that | 14:22 |
| hberaud | So, concerning the task assignment I took all the items | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [oslo] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807588 | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [monasca] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807615 | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cloudkitty] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807622 | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [heat ] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807612 | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [octavia] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807628 | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [octavia] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807620 | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [manila] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807627 | 14:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [OpenStackSDK] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807601 | 14:23 |
| hberaud | #topic Review countdown email contents | 14:24 |
| hberaud | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:24 |
| hberaud | let me know if it LGTY | 14:25 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [ironic ] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807606 | 14:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [magnum] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807626 | 14:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [glance ] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807608 | 14:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [neutron] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807616 | 14:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807599 | 14:27 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [trove] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807652 | 14:27 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [watcher] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807654 | 14:27 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [zun] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807655 | 14:27 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [winstackers] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807621 | 14:27 |
| elodilles | hberaud: shouldn't be the mail from the process from R-3? | 14:27 |
| hberaud | nope | 14:27 |
| hberaud | We are in R-4 | 14:27 |
| hberaud | the rc deadline is next week | 14:27 |
| elodilles | sorry, looked at the wrong week o:) | 14:28 |
| hberaud | (RC1) | 14:28 |
| ttx | checking really fast | 14:29 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: [cyborg] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807624 | 14:30 |
| ttx | hberaud: lgtm | 14:30 |
| hberaud | thanks | 14:30 |
| elodilles | lgtm too | 14:30 |
| hberaud | thanks | 14:30 |
| hberaud | sent | 14:31 |
| hberaud | #topic Is it a good idea to pass https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/801376 pre-release? | 14:32 |
| hberaud | I don't think this is a good idea | 14:32 |
| hberaud | I also left a comment on the review | 14:32 |
| ttx | ok then | 14:32 |
| ttx | lets freeze it | 14:32 |
| ttx | I fear it will double processing time | 14:32 |
| hberaud | +1 | 14:32 |
| hberaud | yes not the right time | 14:33 |
| hberaud | #topic Create stable/stein for devstack-plugin-ceph | 14:33 |
| hberaud | For more context please have a look to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807745 | 14:33 |
| hberaud | the QA team asked for a branch creation stein, I manually created it as they wanted to backport a couple of changes from train too | 14:34 |
| hberaud | this is project a tagless so I don't think created it manually is a big deal | 14:35 |
| hberaud | They merged a patch to prepare the newest branch | 14:36 |
| hberaud | I'll update the sha in this review to see if the CI is more happy with that | 14:36 |
| elodilles | it served the purpose if I'm not mistaken, so I guess it is OK :) | 14:36 |
| hberaud | It could be worth to merge this patch for the sake of a proper history | 14:37 |
| elodilles | yes, that's true. | 14:38 |
| elodilles | the details are in the comments of the patch so at least we have something there | 14:38 |
| hberaud | yes | 14:39 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: devstack-plugin-ceph: create also a stein branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807745 | 14:39 |
| hberaud | update done! ^ | 14:39 |
| hberaud | #topic Do we want to participate to Y PTG - deadline for sign up is today | 14:39 |
| hberaud | elodilles: I remember that we already discussed a bit about this but I just want to confirm that we don't want a Y PTG, ttx, elodilles please confirm | 14:40 |
| hberaud | I need to send our response to Ashlee today | 14:41 |
| elodilles | someone wrote that a 1 hr long one could be held | 14:41 |
| hberaud | I think it's Thierry | 14:41 |
| hberaud | elodilles: You'll own the PTG so what do you think about that? | 14:42 |
| fungi | it might be an opportunity to cover the release metadata api implementation zigo was talking about this week | 14:42 |
| hberaud | indeed | 14:42 |
| elodilles | maybe we can have one and if not so much topic rises then we can just have a short one | 14:42 |
| hberaud | Sold | 14:43 |
| ttx | yep, I said one hour | 14:43 |
| hberaud | Then I'll reply to Ashlee to keep us a place | 14:43 |
| elodilles | thanks hberaud o/ | 14:43 |
| elodilles | should we have an etherpad for the PTG? | 14:44 |
| hberaud | yes | 14:45 |
| hberaud | normally it will be created manually | 14:45 |
| hberaud | usually we copy past our things to changes into the that etherpad too | 14:46 |
| elodilles | ok, will do that next week | 14:46 |
| hberaud | Excellent thanks | 14:46 |
| hberaud | I'll cc you on the email to allow you to follow this topic | 14:47 |
| elodilles | hberaud: cool, thanks! | 14:47 |
| hberaud | done | 14:48 |
| hberaud | #topic Newton and Ocata branch deletion for storlets | 14:48 |
| elodilles | I was planning to run the clean up script during the week but missed it so far :) | 14:49 |
| hberaud | elodilles: yesterday tkajinam asked us about branch deletion for N and O on storelets | 14:49 |
| elodilles | I'll do it now | 14:49 |
| hberaud | tkajinam: FYI ^ | 14:49 |
| hberaud | thanks | 14:49 |
| hberaud | #topic Open Discussion | 14:50 |
| hberaud | Anything else that you want to discuss today? | 14:50 |
| elodilles | nothing from me right now | 14:51 |
| hberaud | When the PTG etherpad will be available I'll add the release metadata API implementation on it | 14:53 |
| elodilles | hberaud: ++ | 14:53 |
| * hberaud forgot that he already added it to our "things to changes" | 14:54 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [vitrage] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807653 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [tacker] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807651 | 14:54 |
| hberaud | OK, thanks everyone. Let's wrap up. | 14:54 |
| hberaud | #endmeeting | 14:54 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Sep 10 14:54:21 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:54 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-09-10-14.00.html | 14:54 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-09-10-14.00.txt | 14:54 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-09-10-14.00.log.html | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [kuryr] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807619 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [designate] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807625 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [swift] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807650 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [keystone] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807618 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [mistral] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807614 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [senlin] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807629 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [nova] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807685 | 14:54 |
| elodilles | thanks hberaud o/ | 14:54 |
| elodilles | hberaud: I could help with the task "On the Monday, generate release requests for all deliverables that have do not have a suitable candidate yet." | 14:55 |
| hberaud | as you want | 14:56 |
| elodilles | hberaud: of course if you are not insisting on doing it by yourself o:) | 14:56 |
| elodilles | though I might need some minor pointers | 14:56 |
| hberaud | I'll let you handle the cwi part https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#r-3-week-rc1-deadline | 14:57 |
| elodilles | i guess it can be done with one of our tools | 14:57 |
| hberaud | elodilles: I'll do the other one | 14:58 |
| elodilles | hberaud: OK, cool, thanks! | 14:58 |
| hberaud | do not hesitate to ping me if something isn't clear | 14:58 |
| elodilles | hberaud: I'll do it Monday afternoon and let you know if anything is not clear :) | 14:58 |
| hberaud | elodilles: Thanks for your help | 14:58 |
| hberaud | excellent! | 14:58 |
| elodilles | :) | 14:59 |
| armstrong | Hello hberaud | 15:24 |
| hberaud | armstrong: o/ | 15:25 |
| armstrong | I missed the meeting today | 15:26 |
| hberaud | np | 15:26 |
| hberaud | I seen you put your name on next weeks items | 15:26 |
| hberaud | thank you | 15:26 |
| armstrong | You’re welcome | 15:29 |
| hberaud | armstrong: Patches of your series are almost all merged https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22xena-stable-branches%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 15:30 |
| armstrong | Nice! | 15:30 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [blazar] Create for all client and non-client lib xena branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807596 | 15:46 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 15:58 | |
| *** marios is now known as marios|out | 16:14 | |
| elodilles | tkajinam: hi, fyi, storlet's *-eol branches are deleted now (along with other eol'd branches; https://paste.opendev.org/show/809239/ ) | 19:39 |
| opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/releases master: [openstack-helm] Add Xena cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808494 | 20:44 |
| opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/releases master: [openstack-helm] Add Xena cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808494 | 20:47 |
| opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/releases master: [openstack-helm] Add Xena cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808494 | 20:59 |
| opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/releases master: [openstack-helm] Add Xena cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808494 | 21:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!