*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
*** dims has quit IRC | 01:59 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 02:07 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-release | 02:19 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
openstackgerrit | Angus Lees proposed openstack/releases: Release oslo.privsep 1.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/283917 | 03:10 |
---|---|---|
*** dims has joined #openstack-release | 03:13 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-release | 03:16 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-release | 04:15 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release oslo.privsep 1.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/283917 | 04:45 |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release | 05:05 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 05:38 | |
*** dims has quit IRC | 05:48 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-release | 05:53 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-release | 05:58 | |
*** openstack has joined #openstack-release | 13:21 | |
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-release | 13:21 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus | 13:21 | |
*** dims has joined #openstack-release | 13:40 | |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release | 13:44 | |
*** gordc has joined #openstack-release | 13:55 | |
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-release | 14:14 | |
ttx | dhellmann: o/ How did the release tools test run go last week ? Is there anything left for us to test this week ? | 14:19 |
* ttx emerges from the catchup | 14:19 | |
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 14:58 | |
*** dims has quit IRC | 15:29 | |
*** dims has joined #openstack-release | 15:30 | |
dhellmann | ttx: I'm looking at an oslo bug atm, but I think you've reviewed everything I've submitted except https://review.openstack.org/279743 | 15:31 |
*** dims has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
openstackgerrit | Sergey Kraynev proposed openstack/releases: Release M3 for Heat Mitaka https://review.openstack.org/284198 | 15:37 |
openstackgerrit | devdatta-kulkarni proposed openstack/releases: Solum mitaka releases https://review.openstack.org/284200 | 15:38 |
*** dims has joined #openstack-release | 16:03 | |
openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/releases: Release os-brick 1.1.0 https://review.openstack.org/284254 | 16:52 |
mriedem | smcginnis: ^ | 16:52 |
smcginnis | mriedem: Thanks! | 16:53 |
*** dims has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
ttx | dhellmann: reviewed and approved | 17:02 |
ttx | dhellmann: maybe we can talk tomorrow about the test run | 17:02 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/release-tools: handle first releases better in the release notes https://review.openstack.org/279743 | 17:03 |
*** dims has joined #openstack-release | 17:03 | |
dhellmann | ttx: yeah, tomorrow sounds good | 17:12 |
dhellmann | ttx: I got the release-test repo set up, but haven't actually tagged any releases there, yet. We should talk about what sorts of tests we want. I have a real release in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279653/ but we probably want an rc release. | 17:13 |
ttx | agreed -- let's try to process that tomorrow | 17:17 |
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 17:31 | |
openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: update the list-changes output to make it easier to read https://review.openstack.org/284303 | 17:48 |
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 18:01 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-release | 18:05 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-release | 18:05 | |
*** bdemers has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-release | 18:13 | |
mriedem | dhellmann: done and done I34145990d0760c1a21888ec1f5978ccaad928126 | 18:41 |
mriedem | oops | 18:41 |
mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284344/ | 18:41 |
*** bdemers has joined #openstack-release | 18:53 | |
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 19:11 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release os-brick 1.1.0 https://review.openstack.org/284254 | 19:21 |
bdemers | so, in the post semver world, (specifically for a release-independent, neutron plugin) is there any reason for us have stable branches named after the releases, but instead <major>.x branches ? | 19:40 |
bdemers | and if so are there any examples of this? | 19:40 |
openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/release-test: add reno https://review.openstack.org/284383 | 19:57 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/release-test: add reno https://review.openstack.org/284383 | 20:05 |
*** gordc has quit IRC | 20:18 | |
*** gordc has joined #openstack-release | 20:47 | |
openstackgerrit | devdatta-kulkarni proposed openstack/releases: Solum mitaka releases https://review.openstack.org/284200 | 20:49 |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/release-test: Update reno for stable/mitaka https://review.openstack.org/284425 | 21:41 |
openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: use unique tmp space dir for make_stable_branch.sh https://review.openstack.org/284426 | 21:42 |
openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: update make_stable_branch.sh to add reno pages https://review.openstack.org/284427 | 21:42 |
openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: [WIP] Final Oslo releases for Mitaka https://review.openstack.org/284430 | 21:45 |
dhellmann | bdemers : we still use the series name for managed projects because we only expect them to support one stable release per series. the CI system also has some built-in assumptions about co-gating projects using the same branch names. I think gnocchi is an example of a project that uses version-specific stable branches but they've had to do some work to have CI function properly. | 21:46 |
dhellmann | ttx: it would be good to get something like https://review.openstack.org/284427 in before we start making stable branches | 21:46 |
bdemers | dhellmann, thanks that helps, I want to move away from stable/<named-release> so we can support multiple releases with a single version. | 21:49 |
bdemers | not that the named-releases prevents this... but a stable/<major>.x might be more fitting | 21:50 |
dhellmann | bdemers : which project? | 21:50 |
bdemers | networking-cisco | 21:50 |
bdemers | but there is a balance here of playing nice with the neutron-stadium | 21:51 |
dhellmann | ok, your case of supporting multiple releases of openstack with one series of networking-cisco probably makes sense to use different names, but you should check with gordc about the work they had to do to make gnocchi testing work | 21:51 |
bdemers | will do! | 21:51 |
gordc | bdemers: long story short. it's doable but infra is setup to follow stable/kilo|liberty|etc pretty strictly so you may need to jump through hoops | 21:56 |
bdemers | thanks, i was just looking through enkins/jobs/gnocchi.yaml | 21:57 |
bdemers | jenkins that is.... | 21:57 |
bdemers | and i see how you had to map versions to releases | 21:57 |
gordc | bdemers: yeah. we need to update it when we have new releases... which isn't bad. although i'm pretty sure infra has us on their blacklist now. | 21:58 |
bdemers | ha! | 21:58 |
dhellmann | bdemers, gordc : maybe you can work together to come up with something a little nicer to reduce the changes needed in infra | 21:59 |
bdemers | i've been trying to think of a _easy_ (and productive) way to support 2 versions of neutron, say min version and later stable | 21:59 |
dhellmann | bdemers : is it possible to do that all in your master branch? | 21:59 |
bdemers | yup | 21:59 |
bdemers | well, almost | 21:59 |
bdemers | ideally, something like master is all new versions (stable master pattern) | 22:00 |
bdemers | but we would still need a <previous-major>.x branch, for any potential issues (CVE's, etc) | 22:00 |
gordc | i think lifeless was working on something similar no? testing min and max reqs? more for libraries though | 22:00 |
bdemers | Cool, i'll pick his brain when he is back online | 22:01 |
openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: [WIP] Final Oslo releases for Mitaka https://review.openstack.org/284430 | 22:09 |
bdemers | one other slightly related question, (possibly the wrong channel) but can pbr detect version changes from git log messages? i.e. +semver: feature | 22:12 |
bdemers | (or similar) | 22:12 |
bdemers | i sort of remember reading about this, but I cannot find anything openstack specific | 22:13 |
*** dims has quit IRC | 22:14 | |
dhellmann | bdemers : there was some work at one point to help it give hints, based on content of commit messages. I don't know the state of that, and don't rely on it. | 22:18 |
bdemers | ok, that would explain why I couldn't find any doc | 22:19 |
*** gordc has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 22:54 | |
*** mriedem has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** dims has joined #openstack-release | 23:08 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
*** mestery has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
*** mestery has joined #openstack-release | 23:35 | |
openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: [WIP] Final Oslo releases for Mitaka https://review.openstack.org/284430 | 23:45 |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-release | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!