meteorfox | boris-42: hey | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 00:00 | |
boris-42 | meteorfox: how is going? | 00:00 |
meteorfox | boris-42: good, but extremely busy. I've been working on adding support for Rackspace to the Google project, PerfKitBenchmarker. https://github.com/meteorfox/PerfKitBenchmarker/tree/rackspace-provider-dev | 00:02 |
meteorfox | boris-42: plus other internal stuff | 00:02 |
meteorfox | boris-42: how about you | 00:02 |
meteorfox | ? | 00:02 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: that one is cloud comparator? | 00:03 |
boris-42 | comparator* | 00:03 |
meteorfox | boris-42: kind of, it will not compare it for, but you can run the benchmarks against different cloud providers | 00:04 |
meteorfox | *it will not compare them for you | 00:04 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: heh someday in rally maybe=) | 00:05 |
meteorfox | boris-42: the workloads are nice | 00:05 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: inside VMs as I assume? | 00:05 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: or framework it self? | 00:05 |
meteorfox | boris-42: yeah, must of the workloads are for inside the vms, there are some cluster_boot scenarios, but its strength is the data plane | 00:06 |
meteorfox | boris-42: it's all through SSH, it provides utilities to add the benchmarks really easily | 00:07 |
meteorfox | boris-42: for example, this is the mongodb_ycsb benchmark https://github.com/meteorfox/PerfKitBenchmarker/blob/rackspace-provider-dev/perfkitbenchmarker/benchmarks/mongodb_ycsb_benchmark.py | 00:08 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: heh someday we will finish this in rally=( | 00:08 |
meteorfox | boris-42: the nice thing about it, is that is very easy to do benchmarks with multiple VMs | 00:09 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: it's our goal =) | 00:09 |
meteorfox | boris-42: I know :) | 00:09 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: to make such framework=) | 00:09 |
*** klindgren_ has joined #openstack-rally | 00:09 | |
boris-42 | meteorfox: this heavy chain https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177014/ =) | 00:10 |
meteorfox | boris-42: at Rackspace, I use Rally for Control Plane (API and stuff), and PerfKitBenchmarker for Data plane | 00:10 |
*** klindgren has quit IRC | 00:11 | |
boris-42 | meteorfox: someday I hope you will use for both rally=) | 00:11 |
meteorfox | boris-42: yeah, I don't think PerfKit, will go as deep into the control plane, as Rally does | 00:12 |
meteorfox | boris-42: I'm part of the PerfKit group, and its mostly academic. MIT and Stanford are part of it too, and they are interested on the workloads, not the API | 00:13 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: heh | 00:13 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: they have more star on their git repo=) | 00:14 |
meteorfox | boris-42: lol yeah | 00:14 |
meteorfox | boris-42: but they are Google, and they announced in their blogs | 00:15 |
meteorfox | boris-42: it was even on TechCrunch | 00:16 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: I should benchmark kubernates=) | 00:18 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: to get in their blog=) | 00:18 |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-rally | 00:20 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 00:21 | |
*** psd|zzz has quit IRC | 00:24 | |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 00:25 | |
*** georgem1 has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Better mocking for self.[admin_]clients in Scenario tests https://review.openstack.org/188554 | 00:29 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 00:33 | |
*** mwagner_afk has joined #openstack-rally | 00:43 | |
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 00:44 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/189463 | 00:48 |
*** BitSmith has joined #openstack-rally | 01:13 | |
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
*** BitSmith has joined #openstack-rally | 01:19 | |
*** BitSmith is now known as [BitSmith] | 01:34 | |
*** [BitSmith] is now known as BitSmith | 01:37 | |
*** BitSmith is now known as [BitSmith] | 01:38 | |
*** [BitSmith] is now known as BitSmith | 01:43 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 01:45 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 01:45 | |
*** georgem1 has joined #openstack-rally | 01:52 | |
*** pboldin has quit IRC | 01:55 | |
*** lutostag has quit IRC | 01:56 | |
*** georgem1 has left #openstack-rally | 02:01 | |
*** BitSmith is now known as [BitSmith] | 02:07 | |
*** [BitSmith] is now known as BitSmith | 02:07 | |
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 02:34 | |
*** yingjun_ has joined #openstack-rally | 02:35 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 02:35 | |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 02:36 |
*** BitSmith has joined #openstack-rally | 02:40 | |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 02:42 |
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 02:44 | |
*** BitSmith has joined #openstack-rally | 02:47 | |
*** kiran-r has quit IRC | 02:51 | |
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 02:54 | |
openstackgerrit | Li Yingjun proposed openstack/rally: Validate tenant related scenarios when using keystone v3 https://review.openstack.org/181321 | 03:19 |
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally | 03:36 | |
*** arxcruz has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 03:42 | |
*** yingjun_ has quit IRC | 03:46 | |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 03:52 |
*** kiran-r has quit IRC | 03:57 | |
*** mahito has joined #openstack-rally | 04:20 | |
*** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally | 04:23 | |
*** mahito has quit IRC | 04:25 | |
*** mahito has joined #openstack-rally | 04:28 | |
*** yfried has quit IRC | 04:53 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 04:56 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 04:56 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 04:56 | |
*** lutostag has joined #openstack-rally | 04:57 | |
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 05:15 | |
*** neeti has joined #openstack-rally | 05:20 | |
*** aswadr has joined #openstack-rally | 05:34 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
*** rdas has joined #openstack-rally | 05:37 | |
*** nihilifer has joined #openstack-rally | 05:38 | |
*** mahito has quit IRC | 05:40 | |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 05:44 |
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap | 05:50 | |
*** mahito has joined #openstack-rally | 06:14 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 06:14 | |
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally | 06:16 | |
*** nkhare has joined #openstack-rally | 06:28 | |
yfried | yingjun: ping re https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 06:32 |
yingjun | yfried, lgtm :) | 06:33 |
yfried | yingjun: are you familiar with neutron LBaaS? | 06:34 |
*** aswadr has quit IRC | 06:35 | |
yingjun | yfried, not a expert of LBaaS, but i am using it | 06:40 |
yfried | yingjun: there's a v2 LBaaS. don't know if it's already available or not, but it uses a lot of the same object names | 06:40 |
yfried | yingjun: pools, members... | 06:40 |
yfried | yingjun: however the objects and the API are completely different. I'm concerned that we will have hard time differentiating between them, so I think we need to have this patch mark which objects/api it's targeting | 06:42 |
yfried | yingjun: like s/pool/pool-v1 | 06:42 |
yfried | yingjun: but I only have a rought idea of the LBaaS and the v2 differences | 06:42 |
yingjun | yfried, there is a patch that adds a validator to check component API version https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181321/5/rally/benchmark/validation.py, maybe we can use it in the case? | 06:45 |
yfried | yingjun: IDK. I think we need an lbaas guy to take a look at the lbaas stuff before we merge them. I'd hate to have to build more wrappers to solve a problem that we can prevent now | 06:46 |
*** neeti has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
yingjun | yfried, make sense to me:), i’ll remove my +2 for now | 06:52 |
yfried | yingjun: do we have someone on the team who might know this? | 06:52 |
yfried | boris-42: ^ | 06:53 |
yfried | kiran-r: ^ we are discussing your patch | 06:53 |
yingjun | yfried, not sure, maybe boris-42 | 06:53 |
*** neeti has joined #openstack-rally | 06:56 | |
kiran-r | yfried, yingjun shall I s/pool/pool-v1 and commit again?? | 07:05 |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 07:08 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 07:08 | |
yfried | kiran-r: it's not that simple. I don't know lbaas very well, just that there are 2 lbaas version and both use some shared terms but have different api. | 07:09 |
yfried | kiran-r: so I suggest that you make clear that you are writing to lbaasV1 | 07:11 |
kiran-r | yfried, I am thinking in that front. | 07:11 |
yfried | kiran-r: so that when you will write the v2, you won't have clashing names. | 07:11 |
yfried | kiran-r: I just had an idea. boris-42 introduced something called plugin-namespace. maybe it would be useful here. | 07:12 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 07:12 | |
kiran-r | yfried: I am clueless.. | 07:13 |
kiran-r | yfried: What is the next step I should take?? | 07:13 |
yfried | kiran-r: me too. you should ask him about that | 07:13 |
kiran-r | boris-42: ping | 07:14 |
kiran-r | boris-42 seems to be inactive in IRC. | 07:14 |
yfried | kiran-r: sorry for confusing you. the whole lbaas versions has me confused as well. that's why I want to be extra careful here | 07:14 |
kiran-r | yfried: no problem | 07:14 |
*** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 07:14 | |
kiran-r | yfried: Please help me close on this. It is taking soooo loong. | 07:14 |
yfried | kiran-r: sorry. It would help if we had a lbaas guru on this that could say if/how we should change everything | 07:15 |
*** neeti has quit IRC | 07:26 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 07:28 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
kiran-r | yfried: ping | 07:30 |
yfried | kiran-r: ? | 07:30 |
kiran-r | yfried: https://github.com/openstack/python-neutronclient/blob/master/neutronclient/v2_0/client.py#L946-L949 V2 pools https://github.com/openstack/python-neutronclient/blob/master/neutronclient/v2_0/client.py#L1065-L1067 v1 pool | 07:30 |
kiran-r | yfried: v2 resources starts with lbaas_* | 07:31 |
kiran-r | yfried: I think we can differentiate this way | 07:31 |
*** pbandzi has joined #openstack-rally | 07:31 | |
yfried | kiran-r: ok. but you're gonna have to document this in commint messages and docstrings | 07:32 |
kiran-r | yfried: https://github.com/openstack/python-neutronclient/blob/master/neutronclient/v2_0/client.py#L365-L380 | 07:32 |
yfried | kiran-r: on second thought, that's too confusing | 07:33 |
yfried | kiran-r: let's go with v1 and v2 | 07:33 |
kiran-r | yfried, v1 path is /lb/ while v2 is /lbaas/ | 07:33 |
yfried | kiran-r: I see | 07:33 |
yfried | kiran-r: but rally ppl won't be diving into neutron code for that | 07:33 |
yfried | kiran-r: suffix all your terminology with _v1 | 07:34 |
kiran-r | yfried: True. so it is better to rename s/pool/v1_pool | 07:34 |
yfried | kiran-r: or that :) | 07:34 |
kiran-r | yfried: I totally understand your point. | 07:34 |
yfried | kiran-r: but make it explicit for the LoadBlancer scenario as well | 07:34 |
yfried | kiran-r: ie scenarios/neutron/loadblancer_1 | 07:35 |
yfried | kiran-r: ie scenarios/neutron/loadblancer_v1 | 07:35 |
kiran-r | yfried: I get it. :) | 07:36 |
yfried | kiran-r: and in your docs and commig msgs mention the lb<->lbaas terminology of neutron | 07:36 |
yfried | kiran-r: you could also mention how crappy and annoying it is, but that is entirely up to you :) | 07:36 |
kiran-r | yfried: :) | 07:38 |
kiran-r | yfried: Would you +2 my code if I commit with those changes?? | 07:38 |
kiran-r | yfried: ;) ^ | 07:38 |
yfried | kiran-r: I haven't reviewed it in details yet, because this was a big pain point for me, but yeah. in principal I would | 07:39 |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] add and remove nodes scenario https://review.openstack.org/181270 | 07:41 |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] Environments scenarios https://review.openstack.org/182873 | 07:41 |
kiran-r | yfried: What if I name it lb_pool for v1 and lbaas_pool for v2? | 07:43 |
yfried | kiran-r: no! | 07:43 |
yfried | kiran-r: use v1 and v2 | 07:43 |
yfried | kiran-r: we can easily change that later | 07:43 |
kiran-r | yfried: Reason, neutron differentiates it by lb and lbaas.. :) | 07:44 |
yfried | kiran-r: think about the scenario name: lb_loadblancer and lbaas_loadbalancer? | 07:44 |
yfried | kiran-r: and look how we are still discussing it because it's unclear | 07:44 |
kiran-r | yfried: you are right, lb_loadblancer and lbaas_loadbalancer sounds ugly. | 07:44 |
*** karimb has joined #openstack-rally | 07:45 | |
*** neeti has joined #openstack-rally | 07:48 | |
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally | 07:49 | |
*** amalinow has joined #openstack-rally | 07:56 | |
*** fhubik has joined #openstack-rally | 08:09 | |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 08:09 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 08:15 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 08:19 | |
*** mahito has quit IRC | 08:34 | |
*** mahito has joined #openstack-rally | 08:35 | |
*** neeti_ has joined #openstack-rally | 08:36 | |
*** neeti has quit IRC | 08:39 | |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-rally | 08:40 | |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-rally | 08:45 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 08:48 | |
openstackgerrit | Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Implementation of 'rally task abort' command https://review.openstack.org/161636 | 08:51 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 08:54 | |
*** amaretskiy has joined #openstack-rally | 08:57 | |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer (LBaaS v1) create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 09:06 |
*** nkhare has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
*** rook has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
*** rook has joined #openstack-rally | 09:08 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 09:08 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 09:13 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 09:35 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 09:42 | |
*** nkhare has joined #openstack-rally | 09:46 | |
*** kiran-r is now known as kiran-r|afk | 09:46 | |
*** kiran-r|afk is now known as kiran-r | 09:46 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 09:47 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 09:53 | |
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 09:54 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 09:55 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 09:58 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 09:58 | |
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 10:01 | |
*** mahito has quit IRC | 10:02 | |
*** BitSmith has joined #openstack-rally | 10:02 | |
openstackgerrit | Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Add scenario for events and traits https://review.openstack.org/180514 | 10:03 |
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 10:13 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 10:18 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 10:19 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 10:25 | |
*** redixin has joined #openstack-rally | 10:27 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 10:31 | |
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 10:33 | |
*** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne | 10:34 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 10:36 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 10:36 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 10:37 | |
openstackgerrit | Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Implementation of 'rally task abort' command https://review.openstack.org/161636 | 10:41 |
openstackgerrit | Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Implementation of 'rally task abort' command https://review.openstack.org/161636 | 10:43 |
*** pboldin has joined #openstack-rally | 10:48 | |
*** nkhare_ has joined #openstack-rally | 10:52 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 10:53 | |
*** nkhare has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 10:55 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 10:56 | |
*** nkhare_ has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add base benchmark for Manila list shares operation https://review.openstack.org/190580 | 10:59 |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add base benchmark for Manila list shares operation https://review.openstack.org/184553 | 11:00 |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add base benchmark for Manila list shares operation https://review.openstack.org/184553 | 11:01 |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_afk | 11:06 | |
*** aix has quit IRC | 11:07 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 11:07 | |
*** rdas has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
*** nkhare_ has joined #openstack-rally | 11:13 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rally | 11:14 | |
pboldin | yfried: hi there | 11:15 |
yfried | pboldin: hi | 11:15 |
pboldin | yfried: what do you think about the commit message here? https://review.openstack.org/182685/ | 11:16 |
pboldin | yfried: I really thing that we should forget about the v2 at the moment and only mention that it is implementatioon of v1 | 11:18 |
pboldin | yfried: like Add Neutron LoadBalancer (LBaaSv1) create and list pool | 11:18 |
yfried | pboldin: reviewing it now. | 11:19 |
pboldin | yfried: well, changeset was just ok before it started to mention that there is v2 and before renaming | 11:20 |
yfried | pboldin: unless you know differently, I am worried that if we don't use "v1" explicitly, we'll run into problems with the v2 | 11:20 |
yfried | pboldin: it was actually my request | 11:20 |
pboldin | yfried: we should not, because as Alex points out, the class is named accordingly | 11:20 |
yfried | pboldin: I agree with that | 11:20 |
yfried | pboldin: if the class is "v1" then it's obvious the methods are v1 as well | 11:21 |
yfried | pboldin: but that's not true for utils | 11:21 |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer(v1) create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 11:21 |
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 11:21 | |
pboldin | yfried: yep. so, I think that '_v1_' is only confusing at the moment. | 11:21 |
yfried | pboldin: I'm commenting now. let me post it and see what you thing | 11:21 |
yfried | think | 11:21 |
kiran-r | pboldin, yfried, ameretskiy: I just pushed a new patchset with Alex suggested changes. | 11:24 |
pboldin | kiran-r: please, dont rush | 11:24 |
yfried | kiran-r: I'm just reviewing the old one. | 11:24 |
kiran-r | pboldin, yfried, ameretskiy: I am sorry | 11:24 |
kiran-r | pboldin, yfried, ameretskiy: Pardon me. | 11:25 |
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC | 11:32 | |
yfried | kiran-r: posted comments. pboldin please take a look as well. | 11:32 |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 11:36 | |
openstackgerrit | Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Implementation of 'rally task abort' command https://review.openstack.org/161636 | 11:49 |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 11:52 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 11:53 | |
*** pboldin has quit IRC | 12:00 | |
*** redixin has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
*** tfreger1 has joined #openstack-rally | 12:05 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 12:05 | |
*** tfreger has quit IRC | 12:07 | |
*** aix has joined #openstack-rally | 12:09 | |
*** fhubik_afk is now known as fhubik | 12:13 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 12:16 | |
*** rdas has joined #openstack-rally | 12:38 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_afk | 12:39 | |
*** neeti_ has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
*** fhubik_afk is now known as fhubik | 12:40 | |
*** nihilifer has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
*** tfreger1 has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 12:48 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 12:54 | |
*** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally | 12:59 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_afk | 13:00 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 13:01 | |
*** fhubik_afk is now known as fhubik | 13:01 | |
*** nkhare_ has quit IRC | 13:03 | |
*** mahito has joined #openstack-rally | 13:04 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 13:05 | |
*** mahito has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** yfried has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** tfreger has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
openstackgerrit | Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Remove deprecated code https://review.openstack.org/188077 | 13:15 |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_afk | 13:23 | |
*** stpierre has joined #openstack-rally | 13:25 | |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer(v1) create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 13:37 |
openstackgerrit | maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer(v1) create and list pool https://review.openstack.org/182685 | 13:40 |
*** pbandzi has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
*** arxcruz has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 14:04 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 14:12 | |
*** psd has joined #openstack-rally | 14:17 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 14:19 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 14:20 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
*** fhubik_afk is now known as fhubik | 14:21 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 14:22 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_afk | 14:34 | |
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 14:34 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila shares https://review.openstack.org/190667 | 14:38 |
*** kiran-r has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC | 14:45 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 14:52 | |
*** praveens has joined #openstack-rally | 14:53 | |
*** fhubik_afk is now known as fhubik | 14:53 | |
*** rdas has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 14:56 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 14:57 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila shares https://review.openstack.org/190667 | 14:57 |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add context for Manila quotas https://review.openstack.org/188484 | 14:57 |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 15:03 | |
*** pboldin has joined #openstack-rally | 15:05 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 15:05 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_afk | 15:07 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 15:17 | |
*** BitSmith has joined #openstack-rally | 15:24 | |
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally | 15:24 | |
*** fhubik_afk is now known as fhubik | 15:24 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 15:25 | |
pboldin | https://review.openstack.org/190379/ < review pls | 15:25 |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 15:26 | |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-rally | 15:26 | |
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally | 15:29 | |
*** anshul has quit IRC | 15:29 | |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk | 15:31 | |
*** praveens1 has joined #openstack-rally | 15:31 | |
*** praveens has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 15:33 | |
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap | 15:42 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
*** amalinow|2 has joined #openstack-rally | 15:51 | |
*** yeungp has joined #openstack-rally | 15:51 | |
*** fhubik has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 15:53 | |
*** amalinow has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 15:56 | |
*** agarciam has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
*** praveens has joined #openstack-rally | 15:57 | |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk | 15:58 | |
*** praveens1 has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 15:59 | |
*** praveens has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 16:02 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 16:05 | |
*** praveens has joined #openstack-rally | 16:06 | |
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 16:10 | |
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 16:10 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 16:15 | |
*** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 16:20 | |
*** kiran-r has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
*** amaretskiy has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 16:27 | |
*** amalinow|2 has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
*** amalinow|2 has joined #openstack-rally | 16:27 | |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Overhaul ceilometer utils unit tests https://review.openstack.org/190712 | 16:29 |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 16:30 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 16:31 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 16:33 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-rally | 16:35 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 16:39 | |
*** praveens has left #openstack-rally | 16:41 | |
*** anshul has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 16:48 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 16:50 | |
stpierre | sweet, gate looks broken | 16:56 |
*** pboldin has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
openstackgerrit | John Wu proposed openstack/rally: [Swift] Add additional Swift scenarios https://review.openstack.org/185793 | 17:04 |
openstackgerrit | John Wu proposed openstack/rally: [Swift] Add objects context class https://review.openstack.org/179578 | 17:04 |
*** philibar has joined #openstack-rally | 17:07 | |
philibar | hey boris-42, the issue we were seeing last time was actually an error somewhere in our config, hence why it would go grab the other config file instead, thanks for the support! | 17:08 |
*** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 17:08 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila share networks https://review.openstack.org/190724 | 17:10 |
*** pboldin has joined #openstack-rally | 17:12 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 17:13 | |
*** amalinow|2 has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** psd has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
*** anshul has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 17:34 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
*** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 17:36 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for creation and listing of Manila share networks https://review.openstack.org/190737 | 17:46 |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 17:56 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 18:03 | |
*** karimb has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
*** karimb has joined #openstack-rally | 18:06 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 18:10 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 18:11 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 18:17 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
*** gema has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 18:22 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 18:24 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 18:28 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 18:34 | |
boris-42 | philibar: you are welocme | 18:36 |
*** yeungp has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
stpierre | boris-42: any idea what might be awry with gate? gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally is reliably failing (and taking a long-ass time to do so); the only errors i can find in the logs are, e.g.: http://logs.openstack.org/85/182685/33/check/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally/8925927/logs/devstack-gate-setup-workspace-new.txt | 18:39 |
boris-42 | stpierre: I saw it today | 18:40 |
boris-42 | stpierre: something got terrible broken | 18:40 |
stpierre | cool | 18:40 |
stpierre | is there anything i can chase down to try to fix it? or are smarter and more capable people than me already hard at work on it? | 18:42 |
boris-42 | stpierre: I am in process of relocation | 18:44 |
boris-42 | stpierre: so a bit busy=) | 18:44 |
boris-42 | stpierre: so at this momnet of time nobody is working | 18:44 |
boris-42 | stpierre: I believe that something bad was merged in devstack or neutron | 18:44 |
stpierre | okay, i'll try to dig in | 18:45 |
boris-42 | stpierre: so you can try to install devstack with neutron | 18:45 |
boris-42 | stpierre: and try to run it | 18:45 |
boris-42 | stpierre: as well we need critical bug for this | 18:45 |
stpierre | i can try, but devstack and i don't usually get along | 18:45 |
boris-42 | stpierre: because something is very bad=( | 18:45 |
stpierre | that i can definitely do | 18:45 |
stpierre | raise the bug against rally, or...? | 18:45 |
boris-42 | stpierre: ya first in rally | 18:46 |
*** aix has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 18:51 | |
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 18:51 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
*** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne | 18:53 | |
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 19:00 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 19:05 | |
*** karimb is now known as karim|dinner | 19:08 | |
*** karim|dinner is now known as karimb|dinner | 19:08 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 19:09 | |
*** pboldin has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
*** anshul has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
boris-42 | stpierre: do not reduce timeout. | 19:22 |
boris-42 | stpierre: let's make a patch set that removes all neutron scenarios | 19:22 |
boris-42 | stpierre: and try to run it in gates | 19:22 |
stpierre | ok | 19:23 |
boris-42 | stpierre: I mean you will get result in 20 minutes not in 2hrs=) | 19:25 |
stpierre | that's better | 19:25 |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: remove neutron jobs https://review.openstack.org/190771 | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: just left single test | 19:26 |
stpierre | oh, it needs one test? | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: this won't work | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: yep | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: Authenticate.keystone | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: 1 iteration | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: with 1 user and 1 tenant | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: that will be very fast | 19:26 |
boris-42 | stpierre: ya debugging in gates party hard | 19:27 |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: remove neutron jobs https://review.openstack.org/190771 | 19:27 |
boris-42 | stpierre: btw this may help https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189463/6 | 19:28 |
boris-42 | stpierre: I just recheked it | 19:29 |
*** gema has joined #openstack-rally | 19:30 | |
boris-42 | stpierre: btw after fixing gates | 19:33 |
*** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne | 19:35 | |
*** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 19:38 | |
*** mwagner_afk has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
*** BitSmith has joined #openstack-rally | 19:40 | |
*** pboldin has joined #openstack-rally | 19:44 | |
*** yeungp has joined #openstack-rally | 19:44 | |
*** pboldin has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 19:54 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
*** pboldin has joined #openstack-rally | 20:03 | |
boris-42 | stpierre: gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally: SUCCESS | 20:10 |
boris-42 | stpierre: LOL | 20:10 |
stpierre | ...the hell | 20:10 |
stpierre | god dammit | 20:10 |
boris-42 | stpierre: we need to run Neutron | 20:10 |
boris-42 | stpierre: benchmark | 20:10 |
boris-42 | stpierre: that is failing | 20:10 |
boris-42 | stpierre: so gates are not totally broken LOL | 20:10 |
stpierre | yeah | 20:10 |
stpierre | actually, this might be enough, if the devstack logs exist | 20:11 |
stpierre | i'll get another build going, but this may give me the info i need | 20:11 |
boris-42 | stpierre: just create one more patch | 20:11 |
boris-42 | stpierre: with another change-id | 20:11 |
boris-42 | stpierre: with neutron benchmark | 20:12 |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: only one neutron task https://review.openstack.org/190796 | 20:14 |
*** philibar has quit IRC | 20:22 | |
*** itzikb has joined #openstack-rally | 20:24 | |
itzikb | Hi, When running boot-runcommand-delete with times:300 I get errors No more IP addresses available on network 23e5ed3b-1a83-4da2-bb1c-750844156a15 | 20:29 |
itzikb | Seems like ports are not deleted | 20:30 |
pboldin | itzikb: what version do you use? | 20:30 |
itzikb | pboldin: 0.0.5 | 20:31 |
pboldin | itzikb: hm, there were a patch that made sure we remove them. nova-net or neutron? | 20:31 |
itzikb | neutron | 20:31 |
pboldin | itzikb: well, seems like you will have to remove them by hand. btw, were there any command script values? this could lead to unfreeed ports | 20:32 |
itzikb | pboldin: I used the instance_dd_test.sh script | 20:34 |
pboldin | itzikb: well, then I want you to reproduce the error while gathering a debug info. this seems like a bug | 20:34 |
*** itzikb has quit IRC | 20:35 | |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] add and remove nodes scenario https://review.openstack.org/181270 | 20:35 |
*** itzikb has joined #openstack-rally | 20:39 | |
boris-42 | itzikb: hey there | 20:40 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so this may happen | 20:40 |
itzikb | boris-42: Sorry have connecion problems | 20:40 |
boris-42 | itzikb: because floating ip addresses are not cleaned up immediately | 20:40 |
boris-42 | itzikb: as far as I know.. | 20:40 |
boris-42 | itzikb: btw are you using latest rally? | 20:41 |
itzikb | boris-42: yes | 20:41 |
itzikb | Got it fresh from git today | 20:41 |
itzikb | boris-42: so I can run just 250 times or so ? | 20:42 |
stpierre | i hacked up a context that cleans up floating IPs. i'm guessing that's the wrong solution, though. | 20:43 |
boris-42 | stpierre: itzikb https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/vm/vmtasks.py#L103-L105 | 20:45 |
boris-42 | stpierre: itzikb ^ they are cleaned in scenario | 20:45 |
boris-42 | itzikb are there some warrning/errors? | 20:45 |
itzikb | boris-42: where in rally or neutron? | 20:46 |
stpierre | boris-42: at least in nova-net, that doesn't actually reap the IPs for reuse by another VM. | 20:47 |
boris-42 | itzikb: rally | 20:47 |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 20:47 | |
boris-42 | stpierre: ya because there is some kind of periodic job | 20:47 |
boris-42 | stpierre: that cleans them | 20:48 |
boris-42 | stpierre: not sure about Neutron, but I think it's the same situtation | 20:48 |
boris-42 | itzikb: ^ | 20:48 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so if there is no errors you will need to do some magic to get more floating IPs | 20:48 |
itzikb | boris-42: I don't know why , they have to be freed , I run 40 vms a time so it shouldn't be a problem | 20:49 |
itzikb | I have >200 floating ips | 20:50 |
boris-42 | itzikb: I believe they are not cleaned up immediately | 20:52 |
boris-42 | itzikb: e.g. we send request remove floating ip from VM, but this floating IP is not immediately available for reassign | 20:53 |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: only one neutron task https://review.openstack.org/190796 | 20:54 |
boris-42 | itzikb: let me ask neutron guys | 20:54 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
itzikb | boris-42: I think the problem is with the internal ports and not the floating ips | 20:55 |
itzikb | boris-42: While running I have ~10 floating ips used but the number of internal network ports are growing | 20:56 |
boris-42 | itzikb: seems quite bad | 20:56 |
boris-42 | itzikb: let's try to debug this stuff | 20:57 |
boris-42 | itzikb: could you run rally task in debug mode | 20:57 |
boris-42 | itzikb: like just vmtask 1 iteration | 20:57 |
boris-42 | itzikb: rally -vd task start ... | 20:57 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so we will see all requests to neutron | 20:57 |
*** itzikb has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
boris-42 | stpierre: oh you found it https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/9d649129ca762f406846190d31997397f0a0c53b ?) | 21:00 |
*** itzikb has joined #openstack-rally | 21:00 | |
stpierre | "found it" is probably overstating things a bit | 21:00 |
boris-42 | stpierre: so we have rally job in neutron | 21:00 |
boris-42 | stpierre: you can try to revert this and check | 21:00 |
stpierre | but that's the only commit that actually does something that was committed between the last known good build and the first known bad build | 21:00 |
stpierre | oh, sweet | 21:00 |
boris-42 | stpierre: actually | 21:02 |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: only one neutron task https://review.openstack.org/190796 | 21:02 |
boris-42 | stpierre: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176711/ | 21:02 |
boris-42 | stpierre: seems it works | 21:02 |
boris-42 | stpierre: e.g. when they merge this everything worked | 21:03 |
stpierre | dang | 21:03 |
boris-42 | itzikb: ping | 21:03 |
itzikb | boris-42: hey again | 21:04 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so did you receive my messages? | 21:04 |
boris-42 | itzikb: regarding to run rally in debug mode | 21:04 |
boris-42 | itzikb: just one iteration of vmtask | 21:04 |
itzikb | boris-42: no but I have the logs | 21:04 |
boris-42 | stpierre: take a look here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189463/ | 21:05 |
boris-42 | stpierre: seems like there is problem with requriments file | 21:06 |
stpierre | i get a 503 from that, so yay gerrit | 21:06 |
stpierre | [16:05:54] <fungi> #status notice Gerrit has been restarted to terminate a persistent looping third-party CI bot | 21:06 |
itzikb | boris-42: ok I'm running it now | 21:07 |
stpierre | i'm not sure what i'm looking at on that review | 21:07 |
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit has been restarted to terminate a persistent looping third-party CI bot | 21:07 | |
boris-42 | stpierre: now it's ok | 21:08 |
boris-42 | stpierre: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189463/ | 21:08 |
boris-42 | stpierre: so requirements are changed | 21:08 |
boris-42 | stpierre: seems like that is causing bugs | 21:09 |
stpierre | why do you think that's causing it? | 21:09 |
boris-42 | stpierre: because I just recheked | 21:09 |
boris-42 | stpierre: that patch and it works | 21:09 |
boris-42 | stpierre: ah no | 21:09 |
boris-42 | stpierre: it's old jenkins result | 21:09 |
stpierre | yeah, zuul shows that rally-gate-dvsm-neutron-rally is still going on that patchset, which is consistent with it failing | 21:10 |
boris-42 | stpierre: ya my fault | 21:13 |
*** anshul has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
itzikb | boris-42: What do you want to see in the debug mode? | 21:21 |
boris-42 | itzikb: whole logs | 21:22 |
boris-42 | itzikb: paste them please here http://paste.openstack.org/ | 21:22 |
*** BitSmith has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
itzikb | boris-42: Isn't the paste for short ones? It doesn't have attach a file | 21:24 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so you can create gist | 21:25 |
boris-42 | https://gist.github.com/ | 21:25 |
boris-42 | itzikb: ^ it doesn't have limitations | 21:25 |
stpierre | okay, whatever's happening here is decidedly touchy. both of my attempts to induce a failure with just a single neutron task have passed gate unexpectedly, so it must have something to do with load or concurrency or something | 21:29 |
stpierre | i'm taking off in ~10 minutes, but everything i know is in the ticket | 21:29 |
stpierre | so hopefully someone else can look at it | 21:29 |
boris-42 | stpierre: thanks for working on this | 21:30 |
openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: only one neutron task https://review.openstack.org/190796 | 21:36 |
itzikb | boris-42: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_sJ3nkK4dLEcHc1dVc2Mm4wbW8/view?usp=sharing | 21:37 |
boris-42 | itzikb: please next time send full log | 21:40 |
boris-42 | itzikb: including the line "rally task start..." | 21:40 |
itzikb | boris-42: ok | 21:42 |
boris-42 | itzikb: something is strange | 21:42 |
boris-42 | itzikb: I see tons of requests to delete various ports | 21:42 |
boris-42 | REQ: curl -i http://10.35.160.29:9696//v2.0/ports/3dbb6aa0-25de-4ae9-b69b-30b7b0fb833e.json -X DELETE -H "User-Agent: python-neutronclient" -H "X-Auth-Token: XXXX" | 21:43 |
boris-42 | itzikb: doesn't seem ok >< | 21:43 |
boris-42 | шitzikb 2015-06-12 00:29:42.192 991 INFO rally.benchmark.runner [-] Task 6a376e0e-acce-4431-afda-ab9ea5540c02 | ITER: 296 END: Error GetResourceErrorStatus: Resource <Server: rally_volume_XRVqWIVw6Z> has ERROR status. | 21:45 |
boris-42 | itzikb: doesn't seem like a single iteration benchamrk log | 21:45 |
boris-42 | itzikb: btw seems like vms are not starting | 21:45 |
boris-42 | itzikb: could you send logs only of 1 single iteration benchmakr | 21:46 |
boris-42 | itzikb: without any other logs | 21:46 |
boris-42 | itzikb: that will help | 21:46 |
itzikb | boris-42: WHen you say one iteration what do you mean - what values for times and concurrency? | 21:48 |
boris-42 | itzikb: times:1 concurrency: 1 | 21:48 |
boris-42 | itzikb: and single benchmark inside the task | 21:48 |
boris-42 | itzikb: and logs only of that run | 21:49 |
boris-42 | itzikb: I don't want logs of 300 vms ... | 21:49 |
boris-42 | itzikb: btw VM becomes in failure state | 21:49 |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 21:49 | |
boris-42 | itzikb: I am not sure that this is because of not enough floating ips | 21:50 |
boris-42 | itzikb: it looks more like not enough fixed ips in network | 21:50 |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
boris-42 | itzikb: but can't say antyhing more without logs of nova | 21:50 |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 22:00 | |
itzikb | boris-42: Hope it's better now https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_sJ3nkK4dLEcHc1dVc2Mm4wbW8/view?usp=sharing | 22:02 |
itzikb | the command is basically sudo rally -vd --log-file mydebug.log task start boot-runcommand-delete.yaml | 22:02 |
boris-42 | itzikb: hm why do you need sudo ouch?? | 22:03 |
boris-42 | itzikb: wrong link | 22:04 |
boris-42 | itzikb: seems like old one debug log | 22:04 |
boris-42 | itzikb: 2015-06-12 00:29:11.802 992 INFO rally.benchmark.runner [-] Task 6a376e0e-acce-4431-afda-ab9ea5540c02 | ITER: 276 END: Error IpAddressGenerationFailureClient: No more IP addresses available on network 77d5f606-b463-472f-8774-c394c0842cc2. | 22:04 |
boris-42 | 22:04 | |
boris-42 | itzikb: ^ there can't be ITER 276 | 22:04 |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
itzikb | boris-42: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_sJ3nkK4dLEaXJ0QVU3RTBoV0U/view?usp=sharing | 22:05 |
*** dpaterson has joined #openstack-rally | 22:06 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 22:06 | |
dpaterson | boris-42: Mr. Boris, please review my tempest cli spec at your leasure: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138785/ | 22:07 |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 22:07 | |
boris-42 | dpaterson: heh that is taking a lot of time.... | 22:08 |
boris-42 | dpaterson: neverending spec | 22:08 |
dpaterson | no shit | 22:08 |
boris-42 | dpaterson: =)) | 22:09 |
boris-42 | itzikb: this one looks better | 22:10 |
dpaterson | boris-42: It's key, at least imo, that the interface is in line with rally/tempest integration | 22:10 |
dpaterson | Why I am asking you take a looksee | 22:10 |
boris-42 | dpaterson: hm but why you are coding it if they don't want?) | 22:10 |
boris-42 | dpaterson: maybe it's better to improve rally verify =) | 22:10 |
boris-42 | dpaterson: sure looking at it | 22:11 |
dpaterson | boris-42: CLI was one of the main objectives discussed at summit | 22:11 |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
dpaterson | Hoping to have more cycles for rally this release as well. | 22:11 |
boris-42 | dpaterson: +1 | 22:14 |
boris-42 | dpaterson: can't do +2 in tempest sorry=0 | 22:14 |
boris-42 | itzikb: ya this file is better | 22:14 |
boris-42 | itzikb: let me take a look at it | 22:14 |
dpaterson | boris-42: thanks and np. | 22:14 |
boris-42 | itzikb: the LOG is very very strange | 22:25 |
boris-42 | itzikb: take a look at this part http://paste.openstack.org/show/284621/ | 22:25 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so we are executing SSH command, after that we are removing FloatingIP | 22:26 |
boris-42 | itzikb: but not deleting VM.. | 22:26 |
boris-42 | itzikb: I can't understand how that can happen according to the cod tat we have in master... | 22:27 |
boris-42 | itzikb: and I don | 22:32 |
boris-42 | itzikb: I don't see logs of VM creation=( | 22:32 |
itzikb | boris-42: strange indeed.. | 22:34 |
*** oanufriev has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
boris-42 | itzikb: all logs except nova.. | 22:40 |
itzikb | boris-42: Did you see the errors regarding security group? | 22:40 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so no worries about that | 22:41 |
boris-42 | itzikb: it's known issue and i just keep that logs to remember to fix that part | 22:42 |
itzikb | too late for me to worry .. | 22:42 |
boris-42 | itzikb: so they are cleaned during generic cleanup that affects resources of context (so it tries to delete already delete sec group) | 22:42 |
boris-42 | itzikb: I mean that one is not a bug that affects anything except logs | 22:43 |
itzikb | makes sense | 22:43 |
boris-42 | itzikb: but I am worried about why I don't see logs from nova | 22:43 |
itzikb | boris-42: When you run it do you see the logs? | 22:44 |
boris-42 | itzikb: run boot-and-delete | 22:45 |
boris-42 | itzikb: and yep I see such stuff | 22:45 |
boris-42 | REQ: curl -g -i 'http://172.16.5.129:8774/v2/6521e53effa746b6985b784cb361b381/servers/fe170fb7-1426-4d34-8389-02750c464cf7' -X GET -H "Accept: application/json" -H "User-Agent: python-novaclient" -H "X-Auth-Project-Id: ctx_rally_581fa3a0-09c1-4483-871e-b2b62283a804_tenant_0" -H "X-Auth-Token: {SHA1}8f4c0da92425f7352d1dd107bf40988f804dafd0" | 22:45 |
boris-42 | itzikb: same with boot_runcommand_delete | 22:47 |
boris-42 | itzikb: I see logs from python nova client | 22:47 |
boris-42 | REQ: curl -g -i 'http://172.16.5.129:8774/v2/67701527f4c74d9aa2447666bcb33af5/servers/8573d911-7973-435c-9703-0f91fbd225f4' -X GET -H "Accept: application/json" -H "User-Agent: python-novaclient" -H "X-Auth-Project-Id: ctx_rally_d3e263eb-ffa0-4184-a80f-227a83dd3219_tenant_0" -H "X-Auth-Token: {SHA1}db89fc1cfca5d001b1fc5f06cf62f109345fa2b1" | 22:47 |
itzikb | boris-42: good night | 22:58 |
itzikb | boris-42: Hope we'll solve it | 22:58 |
boris-42 | itzikb: see you | 22:59 |
boris-42 | itzikb: btw what is your time zone? | 22:59 |
*** karimb|dinner has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** itzikb has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-rally | 23:42 | |
openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: only one neutron task https://review.openstack.org/190796 | 23:46 |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!