opendevreview | Maxim Sava proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix enable-volume-image-dep-tests config option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/922709 | 08:19 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/tempest master: [WIP]Add test to verify hostname allows FQDN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/922342 | 08:37 |
opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/devstack master: enable openstack-cli-server and other perfromace tunings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/922630 | 10:02 |
sean-k-mooney | ^ this version drops bullseye and openEuler jobs | 10:03 |
sean-k-mooney | im going to submit a change to horizon to move them form bullseye to bookworkm now | 10:03 |
opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/tempest master: [WIP]Add test to verify hostname allows FQDN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/922342 | 11:16 |
sean-k-mooney | this is the related horizon patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/922724 | 11:52 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/tempest master: Fix enable-volume-image-dep-tests config option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/922709 | 12:22 |
*** haleyb|out is now known as haleyb | 13:14 | |
qwebirc29098 | I have been given responsibility to be new maintainer of IBM storage CI, but didn't get any context or credentials from old owner who is no more in IBM. Whom should I contact current CI page and to check its config? | 14:15 |
qwebirc29098 | Also I need to know the architecture followed to deploy 3rd party CI/CD. | 14:16 |
opendevreview | Jakub Skunda proposed openstack/tempest master: Modify mounting paths https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/922738 | 14:36 |
sean-k-mooney | qwebirc29098 the config would all be on your side within ibm | 14:53 |
sean-k-mooney | the third party ci just use a normal gerrit account by convention with -ci in the name | 14:53 |
sean-k-mooney | and they the submit result via a comment with a link to result hosted somewhere by ibm | 14:54 |
kopecmartin | #startmeeting qa | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jun 25 15:00:32 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'qa' | 15:00 |
kopecmartin | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours | 15:00 |
kopecmartin | #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) | 15:01 |
kopecmartin | i cancelled office hours on every odd week, at least for the summer, due to a small attendance | 15:02 |
lpiwowar | o/ | 15:02 |
kopecmartin | and 17:00 utc is quite late for me, especially during the summer | 15:02 |
frickler | +1 | 15:03 |
kopecmartin | from now on, we'll have the office hour biweekly on tuesdays, practically every 2 weeks from today | 15:03 |
kopecmartin | every Tuesday (even weeks) at 15:00 UTC | 15:03 |
kopecmartin | o/ | 15:03 |
kopecmartin | #topic Dalmatian Priority Items progress | 15:04 |
kopecmartin | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-dalmatian-priority | 15:04 |
kopecmartin | do we have any updates on the priority items? | 15:04 |
* kopecmartin checking | 15:04 | |
frickler | noble support is kind of done, thx to sean-k-mooney and bauzas | 15:05 |
kopecmartin | yeah, thanks | 15:05 |
sean-k-mooney | i left it non voting ot see how it was for a week or so but we should fliip it to voting if it remains stables | 15:05 |
kopecmartin | +1 | 15:06 |
kopecmartin | and that's about it, other priority items don't seem to have any updates | 15:07 |
kopecmartin | moving on | 15:07 |
kopecmartin | #topic Gate Status Checks | 15:07 |
kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 15:07 |
kopecmartin | maybe this time this will pass | 15:08 |
kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/922108 | 15:08 |
kopecmartin | if not, the devstack change should help | 15:08 |
kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/922630 | 15:09 |
kopecmartin | approved and we're waiting for the CI | 15:09 |
kopecmartin | #topic Sub Teams highlights | 15:09 |
kopecmartin | Changes with Review-Priority == +1 | 15:09 |
kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 15:09 |
kopecmartin | 2 patches, one the devstack one mentioned above and the other depends on the tempest change mentioned above too | 15:10 |
kopecmartin | fingers crossed, hopefully those will get merged now | 15:11 |
kopecmartin | #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks | 15:12 |
kopecmartin | Periodic stable full: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?pipeline=periodic-stable&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1&job_name=tempest-full-2023-2&job_name=tempest-full-2024-1 | 15:12 |
kopecmartin | Periodic stable slow: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-slow-2024-1&job_name=tempest-slow-2023-2&job_name=tempest-slow-2023-1 | 15:12 |
kopecmartin | Periodic extra tests: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-2024-1-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-2023-2-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1-extra-tests | 15:12 |
kopecmartin | Periodic master: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic | 15:12 |
kopecmartin | tempest-slow-2024-1 keeps failing a lot | 15:14 |
kopecmartin | it's mainly related to tempest.scenario.test_volume_migrate_attached.TestVolumeMigrateRetypeAttached tests | 15:15 |
kopecmartin | i'll try to dig more into that later | 15:17 |
kopecmartin | #topic Distros check | 15:17 |
kopecmartin | Centos 9: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 | 15:17 |
kopecmartin | Debian: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bookworm&skip=0 | 15:17 |
kopecmartin | Rocky: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx | 15:18 |
kopecmartin | openEuler: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovs&skip=0 | 15:18 |
kopecmartin | jammy: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0 | 15:18 |
kopecmartin | one this gets merged, I'll update these links in the agenda as we're removing the openeuler and bullseye jobs | 15:18 |
kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/922630 | 15:18 |
kopecmartin | apart from the bullseye and openeuler builds, it looks quite ok | 15:20 |
kopecmartin | #topic Open Discussion | 15:20 |
kopecmartin | anything for the open discussion? | 15:20 |
lpiwowar | kopecmartin: Can I raise the stackviz issue here or somewhere else? | 15:21 |
clarkb | there are still a lot of projects running fips jobs on centos 8 stream | 15:21 |
lpiwowar | We have an active development for stackviz. Austin Nazworth (a student who is part of the upstream mentorship program) is working on updating the depencencies for the project. | 15:21 |
lpiwowar | We were thinking whether it would be possible to create a dev branch for the stackviz repository as there are probably multiple separate patches needed that update the project to the newest dependencies. | 15:22 |
lpiwowar | Is it something that would be possible or we should just try to merge everything into main? | 15:23 |
kopecmartin | lpiwowar: master of stackviz is broken, i don't see a problem of merging the patches that are ready to master .. even if the whole effort of bringing stackviz to up-to-date is still WIP | 15:23 |
kopecmartin | gmann: wdyt? | 15:23 |
frickler | I have bad experience with dev branches, trying to do things in master would be better | 15:24 |
lpiwowar | kopecmartin, frickler: +1, thank you | 15:24 |
kopecmartin | +1 agree, i want to avoid unnecessary administration too (with creating the branch and then merging it to master .. ) | 15:24 |
kopecmartin | soo, the fips jobs | 15:24 |
kopecmartin | what do we want to do there? check the projects that use fips with cs8 whether they have fips on cs9 or rocky and if so, then remove the cs8 job, if not, try to update it to cs9/rocky? | 15:25 |
clarkb | it seems like there are c9s alternatives but ut might be good for the qa team to provide some guidance to projects | 15:26 |
clarkb | Mostly I want to call it out as a dead end and waste of resources | 15:26 |
frickler | iiuc there is no alternative to fips-c9s? | 15:27 |
clarkb | right c9s is the alternative to c8s | 15:27 |
clarkb | c8s is completely broken | 15:27 |
kopecmartin | hmm, ok, i can send an email to the ML to bring it up | 15:28 |
kopecmartin | I'll also check with Ade Lee although he's on PTO for the next 2 weeks or so | 15:28 |
kopecmartin | if the jobs are completely broken, I don't see a reason we should keep them around | 15:29 |
kopecmartin | i'll mention that in the email too, just to be transparent | 15:29 |
clarkb | correct, I'm going to delete the nodes entirely soon | 15:29 |
kopecmartin | good | 15:29 |
clarkb | but projects should be given some path forward and I'm not in a position to say what that should be | 15:30 |
kopecmartin | i see, if i recall correctly, the plan was to add some fips jobs on rocky, no idea what's the status of that now, i'll check that too | 15:31 |
kopecmartin | anything else for the open discussion? | 15:33 |
kopecmartin | #topic Bug Triage | 15:34 |
kopecmartin | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-dalmatian | 15:34 |
kopecmartin | bug numbers are recorded ^ | 15:34 |
kopecmartin | the counts have been quite steady recently | 15:34 |
kopecmartin | aand that's it , if there isn't anything else, that's it | 15:34 |
kopecmartin | thank you all | 15:35 |
kopecmartin | #endmeeting | 15:35 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jun 25 15:35:37 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:35 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2024/qa.2024-06-25-15.00.html | 15:35 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2024/qa.2024-06-25-15.00.txt | 15:35 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2024/qa.2024-06-25-15.00.log.html | 15:35 |
lpiwowar | thank you kopecmartin | 15:35 |
gmann | kopecmartin: lpiwowar: on stackviz, yeah let's do on master. extra branch are more work and we might not be able to test/review properly | 17:05 |
gmann | we have integrated job there so anything breaking should be catchable in CI itself | 17:06 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack master: enable openstack-cli-server and other perfromace tunings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/922630 | 17:14 |
sean-k-mooney | :) | 17:32 |
sean-k-mooney | gmann: your right i proably should have split the patches and stacked them | 17:36 |
sean-k-mooney | since that now merged im going to abandon the time out patch but ill rework the tempest specific optimization patch to just bump concurrance to 6 | 17:37 |
sean-k-mooney | ill also start abandoing my nova specific tuneing patches | 17:37 |
gmann | sean-k-mooney: sure, I missed my comment yesterday and it was in draft only. now removal of support for those distro is silently done but as it is merged we cannot do anything | 17:39 |
gmann | +1 on trying the concurrance to 6, we can try in tempest-full-py3 and a few more job first and if it work fine then we can re-do it by default in devstack-tempsest job and see how it goes | 17:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!