Wednesday, 2023-02-22

opendevreviewNobuhiro MIKI proposed openstack/devstack master: Disable memory_tracker and file_tracker in unstask.sh properly  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/86523701:39
gmannkopecmartin: meanwhile you push the fix and it get merged. can we merge this revert to unblock the gate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/87462502:49
gmannwe need to make tempest release also as release time is approaching02:49
gmannkopecmartin: ykarel: stable/wallaby and older tempest-full-py3 fix is working and ready to review but that is blocked by cirrors new version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/874704 03:32
*** yadnesh|away is now known as yadnesh04:42
opendevreviewyatin proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix tempest-full-py3 for stable/ussuri to wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87470406:57
opendevreviewyatin proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix tempest-full-py3 for stable/ussuri to wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87470406:59
ykarelThanks gmann 07:25
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:26
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off09:35
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena09:44
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack master: Revert "Bump cirros version to 0.6.1"  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/87462509:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/tempest master: Fix tempest-full-py3 for stable/ussuri to wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87470412:32
opendevreviewAde Lee proposed openstack/tempest master: Testing fips jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87369713:59
*** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|away13:59
opendevreviewAde Lee proposed openstack/devstack master: Modify devstack-base to allow for fips  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/87160613:59
*** haleyb_out is now known as haleyb14:01
opendevreviewJorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/tempest master: Add a tempest test to verify lack of cgroupsv2 support for cpu controller.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87370614:11
dansmithgmann: uuuugh. Now that we don't wait for the attachment to complete, we race with server delete to be able to delete the volume14:51
dansmithI'm not really sure what to do to address that really14:52
dansmithbecause the "resources are unwound in reverse order" kinda ties our hands a bit in what we can do and when14:53
dansmithwe could go back to always waiting, but make the wait non-fatal (and maybe shorter)14:53
dansmithno, no we can't... we'll still race with server delete in that case14:54
dansmithargh.14:54
opendevreviewDan Smith proposed openstack/tempest master: Log console on failure to delete attachment  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87478214:57
opendevreviewDan Smith proposed openstack/tempest master: Avoid long wait for volume detach in some tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87470015:23
dansmithgmann: here's one option ^15:25
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix creation of requested creds within the same project  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87101815:46
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Use project_reader in server test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87121015:46
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Add releasenote to tag the Tempest for 2023.1 release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87435715:46
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Use stable constraint in tox to release new tag for 2023.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87435915:46
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Switch to the master constraint in tox.ini  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87436015:47
gmanndansmith: humm, and can we delete the server before volume? 15:49
gmanncurrently it is volume delete then server delete15:50
dansmithgmann: I don't think so15:50
dansmithgmann: we delete the server as part of the test cleanup, and the volume as part of class/resource cleanup right?15:50
dansmithohhh, I guess I'm wrong15:51
dansmithI was reading the resource_setup() which creates a volume,15:51
dansmithbut I guess we also create a volume in that test as well, after the server15:51
dansmithcripes15:51
dansmithgmann: okay I give up15:52
gmanndansmith:  ah right, we use two volume in that test.15:53
dansmithI don't think we actually _use_ two, but we _have_ two15:53
dansmithbut you're right, we're attaching the volume we created *after* the server15:54
dansmithwhich means we rely on the detach in order to be able to delete it, before we delete the server15:54
gmannok, I saw another test. not sure why we create class level volume. so in this test if we create the volume before server then deletion order will be server delete first and then volume15:56
dansmithyeah15:56
dansmithso I can slip another patch to change that ordering in underneath the patch to not hang on detach15:57
gmann+115:57
dansmithah, also,15:57
dansmithtest_snapshot_create_offline_delete_online15:57
dansmithuses the class-based volume15:58
dansmithand creates the server after15:58
dansmithso I was probably not being specific enough about which test I was looking at across multiple flavors15:58
gmannI think we can create test level volume here when we know even single test does a lot on guest resources there is less point to make resouces sharable among tests15:59
gmannlet's continue this after TC meeting15:59
dansmithyup16:00
opendevreviewDan Smith proposed openstack/tempest master: Avoid long wait for volume detach in some tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87470017:26
opendevreviewDan Smith proposed openstack/tempest master: Change order of server/volume in snapshot test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87479417:26
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:35
dansmithman the gate is fuuuul18:07
*** JasonF is now known as JayF19:51
dansmithgmann: kopecmartin: is this okay to land? it will help debug volume failures: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/874782/20:45
dansmithalternately we could recheck a few times and hope we get one of those failures in waiting to detach20:45
gmanndansmith: checking20:46
gmanndansmith: +2, will see if kopecmartin is around to +W otherwise will approve it after my lunch (~2 hrs from now)20:49
dansmithcool, thanks20:49
gmannkopecmartin: once you are online https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87434921:21
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Add RBAC new defaults and scope job for stable/zed  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87481121:28
dansmithgmann: this is about to pass on the first try (since I fixed it), which is a good sign: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/874700/321:43
dansmithshould we recheck that a few times to see if we can shake out a volume failure that this doesn't fix?21:43
gmanndansmith: nice. yeah we can recheck few times just to make sur21:57
gmannsure21:57
dansmithcool22:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/tempest master: Use assertLessEqual for downtime validation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/87423222:45
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/patrole master: Fix tox4 error  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/87481723:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!