| *** chas has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
| *** mdrabe_ has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:32 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:37 | |
| *** kylek3h has quit IRC | 00:40 | |
| *** kylek3h has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:41 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:58 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 01:03 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-powervm | 01:50 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 01:53 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 01:53 | |
| *** chas has joined #openstack-powervm | 01:59 | |
| *** chas has quit IRC | 02:03 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 02:18 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 02:22 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 02:40 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 02:46 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 02:49 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 02:51 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 02:58 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 03:08 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 03:16 | |
| *** chas has joined #openstack-powervm | 04:00 | |
| *** chas has quit IRC | 04:05 | |
| *** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 04:12 | |
| *** jpasqualetto has quit IRC | 04:38 | |
| *** shyama has joined #openstack-powervm | 04:52 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 05:05 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
| *** tjakobs has quit IRC | 05:27 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 05:31 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 05:48 | |
| *** chas has joined #openstack-powervm | 06:01 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 06:06 | |
| *** chas has quit IRC | 06:06 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 06:06 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 06:08 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 06:12 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 07:01 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 07:12 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 07:17 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 07:20 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 08:13 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 08:34 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 08:45 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** apearson has quit IRC | 09:26 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 09:29 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 09:34 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 09:44 | |
| *** apearson has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 09:54 | |
| *** apearson has quit IRC | 09:55 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 09:56 | |
| *** apearson has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 10:03 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 10:03 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 10:07 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 10:33 | |
| *** apearson has quit IRC | 10:34 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 10:37 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 10:49 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 10:57 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-powervm | 11:01 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 11:10 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 11:50 | |
| *** apearson has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
| *** efried has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:11 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:26 | |
| *** jpasqualetto has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:26 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:28 | |
| *** jpasqualetto has quit IRC | 12:31 | |
| thorst | efried: there? | 12:41 |
|---|---|---|
| efried | thorst yuh, sup? | 12:41 |
| thorst | Jay pinged me over night. Said he failed because the vif binding timed out | 12:41 |
| thorst | is that what you would expect? | 12:41 |
| thorst | I'm not sure how far up the stack you got | 12:42 |
| efried | thorst I responded to him also. Wanted to verify that he used --nic none. He's stacked in-tree, as far as I know, so we shouldn't even be trying to attach networkse. | 12:43 |
| thorst | got it. | 12:43 |
| thorst | sounds like he's pretty close and ready to move to OOT | 12:43 |
| thorst | :-D | 12:43 |
| *** jpasqualetto has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:44 | |
| thorst | efried: any reviews I'm backlogged on that you need today? | 12:51 |
| efried | thorst I wouldn't be offended if you +1ed these: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/powervm-nova-compute-driver+status:open+is:mergeable | 12:53 |
| efried | But they're already +2ed, so not crucial. | 12:53 |
| thorst | I should be doing that anyway | 12:53 |
| thorst | I would like to understand what we then need to pull back to OOT | 12:53 |
| thorst | I would expect some of this should be going back...not a ton (like UT changes) but we don't want too much variation there. | 12:54 |
| thorst | ex: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443189/8..21/nova/tests/unit/virt/powervm/__init__.py | 12:54 |
| efried | thorst Yeah, I haven't been doing a good job keeping explicit track of things we want to bring back. | 12:54 |
| thorst | seems like that (even though UT) should be brought back | 12:54 |
| thorst | lets maybe spend a few days next week doing a small audit of that | 12:55 |
| thorst | get a few change sets lined up | 12:55 |
| efried | Right. | 12:55 |
| thorst | and then we'll figure out the next set of stuff to bring IT | 12:55 |
| efried | I mean, I've been doing some of them as we go. | 12:55 |
| thorst | yeah | 12:55 |
| thorst | which have been good...want to make sure we maintain that rigor | 12:55 |
| thorst | as that would be easy to lose | 12:55 |
| efried | thorst Oh, no, we've got several in-tree changes still lined up that need to be re-re-re-rebased and brought up to scratch. | 12:55 |
| thorst | heh | 12:56 |
| efried | cfg drive, localdisk, ovs_vif | 12:56 |
| efried | Here's the previous list with those added: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/powervm-nova-compute-driver+status:open | 12:56 |
| efried | Not sure if we should do something about re-ownering wangqwsh's | 12:57 |
| *** jay has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:57 | |
| *** jay is now known as Guest609 | 12:57 | |
| efried | Howdy jay - have you retried with --nic none? | 12:57 |
| Guest609 | Just reached home now.. trying that only.. | 12:57 |
| efried | k | 12:58 |
| *** Guest609 has quit IRC | 12:58 | |
| thorst | short and to the point | 12:58 |
| thorst | :-p | 12:58 |
| efried | ? | 12:58 |
| thorst | joined, gave status, left | 12:58 |
| *** jay1_ has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:59 | |
| efried | connection issues | 12:59 |
| efried | thorst BTW, I'm mainly focused on the service catalog blueprint at the moment. | 12:59 |
| thorst | gah, take a joke :-) | 12:59 |
| efried | Guess I'm the cranky one today. | 12:59 |
| efried | (not really) | 12:59 |
| thorst | understood, we'll need iSCSI focus too though. That's the main thing with a deadline that I know of. The rest is as able. Backports and what not. | 13:00 |
| thorst | yeah man...I got 5.5 hours of sleep last night | 13:00 |
| thorst | so I can take on the world | 13:00 |
| efried | thorst Also hoping we can get those in-tree changes merged soonish so I can continue up the stack. | 13:00 |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:00 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:01 | |
| esberglu | #startmeeting powervm_driver_meeting | 13:01 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Apr 25 13:01:41 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is esberglu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:01 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:01 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting' | 13:01 |
| edmondsw | o/ | 13:01 |
| thorst | o/ | 13:02 |
| thorst | efried: yep, understood | 13:02 |
| efried | o/ | 13:02 |
| esberglu | #topic In-tree Driver | 13:02 |
| edmondsw | sdague just +2'd #3 and #4 | 13:03 |
| jay1_ | efried: It is not allowing with --nic none | 13:04 |
| jay1_ | neo@neo34:/opt/stack/powervm-ci/tempest$ openstack server create VM1 --image Ubuntu2g --flavor CI_flv_1 --nic none | 13:04 |
| jay1_ | nics must be a list | 13:04 |
| efried | jay1_ You need to set the API microversion. | 13:04 |
| efried | Let's do this after the meeting. | 13:04 |
| jay1_ | sure.. | 13:04 |
| esberglu | Nice that we're continuing to make progress there | 13:05 |
| thorst | very | 13:05 |
| thorst | good work efried | 13:05 |
| efried | :) | 13:05 |
| efried | Soon's I see mriedem I'll pester him for +W. | 13:06 |
| esberglu | Any actions we need to take in-tree atm? | 13:06 |
| thorst | I'm reviewing for +1, though I think its mostly just for my own sanity | 13:06 |
| esberglu | Yeah I have a couple that need a +1 still too | 13:06 |
| thorst | and as we discussed, we'll need to get a little rigor around making sure we backport some of these changes to OOT | 13:06 |
| *** chas has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:06 | |
| efried | esberglu You have in-tree change sets up for review? | 13:07 |
| thorst | that's an easy one to just forget to do | 13:07 |
| esberglu | No I meant reviewing them | 13:07 |
| efried | oh, okay. | 13:07 |
| efried | So yeah, esberglu I don't know if you have a way for carrying forward action items to bring up in subsequent meetings, but... | 13:07 |
| thorst | esberglu: if you have bandwidth, you could maybe help bring those IT patches back to OOT. But I'm not sure what your BW looks like | 13:07 |
| efried | Yeah, one would be that, or at least queueing up a recurring reminder that we need to do that at some point. | 13:08 |
| thorst | ex. Things like this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438729/11..18/nova/virt/powervm/tasks/base.py | 13:08 |
| esberglu | thorst: efried: Yeah I was already planning on doing that this sprint | 13:08 |
| thorst | awesome. | 13:08 |
| efried | Sweet. That one specifically has an associated bug, esberglu - remind me to give it to you if you tackle that one. | 13:09 |
| *** mdrabe_ has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:09 | |
| efried | esberglu https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova-powervm/+bug/1680947 | 13:10 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1680947 in nova-powervm "Use PrintingDurationListener, get rid of PowerVMTask" [Wishlist,New] | 13:10 |
| esberglu | #action esberglu: Port IT changes OOT | 13:10 |
| *** dwayne has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:10 | |
| esberglu | #topic OOT Driver | 13:11 |
| *** chas has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
| efried | Another item to queue up - not critical now, but hopefully will be in a week or two - do/should we re-owner wangqwsh's change set? | 13:11 |
| thorst | efried: I'm not sure how to do that...but its not critical IMO | 13:11 |
| thorst | I know he's not working on it anymore, but it wouldn't be awful for him to get some credit on it? Though I admit he did not do the lion's share of the work. | 13:12 |
| efried | thorst My only concern is that there may be some things we're not allowed to do to it if we don't own it. | 13:12 |
| thorst | o, then yes | 13:12 |
| thorst | that makes more sense then | 13:12 |
| efried | Yeah, I'm less concerned about the credit. | 13:12 |
| efried | But maybe we don't worry about it until/unless it becomes a problem. | 13:12 |
| efried | At that point, I imagine the cores would be able to fix it for us. | 13:12 |
| efried | Though for procedure's sake, the cores may want us to re-owner it anyway. | 13:12 |
| thorst | its the OVS one? | 13:12 |
| thorst | I think the rest had me as owner | 13:13 |
| thorst | well the rest of the ones that aren't YOU | 13:13 |
| efried | yeah - https://review.openstack.org/422512 | 13:13 |
| thorst | (even though they are you) | 13:13 |
| *** chas has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:13 | |
| efried | Right, cfg drive and local disk (and console) are under thorst | 13:13 |
| thorst | I suspect the OVS one will be the trickiest. | 13:14 |
| efried | There's some kind of co-authored-by tag. Not sure if it's meaningful or what. | 13:14 |
| thorst | probably only meaningful for credit (discount to PTG or something) | 13:14 |
| thorst | highly doubt meaningful to gerrit | 13:14 |
| efried | #action efried to ask nova cores what to do about new ownership / co-authorship of in-tree changes. | 13:14 |
| efried | Today is launchpad cleanup day, so prolly not a lot of other stuff going to get done there. | 13:15 |
| edmondsw | gerrit records both author and committer, with author being the most recent person to upload a changeset | 13:16 |
| edmondsw | I think both get credit | 13:16 |
| edmondsw | for PTG, etc. | 13:16 |
| edmondsw | but I could be wrong there | 13:16 |
| thorst | edmondsw: right, but not sure that a co-authored tag in the commit message get counted | 13:16 |
| edmondsw | I have seen the coauthored tag... I think that's just to get credit in the commit message | 13:16 |
| thorst | and if it does maybe just for PTG | 13:16 |
| thorst | but, not super important for us to figure out in the mtg | 13:16 |
| edmondsw | I would add the coauthored tag just to cover all bases | 13:16 |
| thorst | +1 | 13:17 |
| edmondsw | yep | 13:17 |
| efried | Other than backports, I don't have anything OOT until jay1_ gets back to testing with it. There was that bizarre neutron problem that we never nailed down, but it may have been a one-off, env-specific. | 13:17 |
| edmondsw | what about that localdisk one, and the 2 I see as WIP (config drive and ovs vif)? | 13:18 |
| efried | edmondsw Yeah, those are the ones we're talking about, and the console one. | 13:19 |
| efried | cfg drv, localdisk, and ovs vif all need to be rebased/finished. | 13:19 |
| efried | ovs vif may or may not need a new owner. | 13:19 |
| thorst | ovs vif will be the hard one... | 13:19 |
| edmondsw | efried, but I mean more than just changing ownership, are we working on finishing them? | 13:19 |
| efried | And all four may or may not need co-authorship. | 13:19 |
| thorst | as it has CI changes. | 13:19 |
| thorst | but I suspect we'll get to that later. | 13:19 |
| efried | edmondsw Waiting until we get the first set merged (or closer to merged) | 13:20 |
| edmondsw | k | 13:20 |
| efried | There's four that should be ready for +W at this point. | 13:20 |
| efried | I'll bug mriedem about those tomorrow, since today is bug day. | 13:20 |
| thorst | are we at the OOT section of the meeting? | 13:20 |
| thorst | I have a minor thing there... | 13:20 |
| esberglu | Yeah | 13:20 |
| thorst | Ok...I missed. | 13:20 |
| thorst | basically, I'm pursuing some router fixes in neutron that don't really affect PowerVM, but rather all hypervisors | 13:21 |
| thorst | we're just impacted because its wrong | 13:21 |
| thorst | so that's what I'm doing 'OOT' wise... | 13:21 |
| esberglu | Okay nice | 13:21 |
| thorst | focus area is really just backports (which we have owner on) and then those blue prints we reviewed earlier | 13:21 |
| thorst | making sure that we follow up on those items | 13:21 |
| thorst | edmondsw: did you have a chance to talk to the PVC folks that were impacted? | 13:22 |
| thorst | I haven't yet | 13:22 |
| edmondsw | no | 13:22 |
| edmondsw | I'll try to do that today | 13:22 |
| thorst | #action edmondsw and thorst to discuss BP with PVC folks | 13:22 |
| thorst | I think that's all I had. Still want to investigate PCI pass thru, but lower priority | 13:23 |
| esberglu | #topic PowerVM CI | 13:23 |
| esberglu | Last afternoon a couple tests started failing consistently. I thought it was just a tempest conf thing, but apparently not | 13:24 |
| efried | esberglu Saw another handful of "merge failures" this morning. | 13:24 |
| esberglu | efried: That's pretty regular | 13:24 |
| thorst | heh, yeah the CI appeared to go full crazy last night | 13:24 |
| esberglu | I haven't had a chance to look yet today | 13:24 |
| esberglu | But anyhow I was gonna disable those 2 tests while I investigate the cause | 13:25 |
| esberglu | What do you mean full crazy? | 13:25 |
| thorst | my inbox was full of failures | 13:25 |
| thorst | which isn't crazy | 13:25 |
| thorst | figured a test went rogue | 13:25 |
| thorst | these were existing tests? | 13:25 |
| esberglu | Yeah. 1 new unsupported test. 2 existing tests now failing | 13:26 |
| esberglu | Will be putting up a changeset right after the meeting for those | 13:26 |
| thorst | k | 13:26 |
| esberglu | Other than that I have a handful of neo-os-ci patches up | 13:27 |
| esberglu | Mostly small stuff, nothing critical | 13:27 |
| esberglu | But also should be easy reviews | 13:27 |
| esberglu | Planning to look into OVS support in CI this sprint | 13:28 |
| thorst | lets find some time to talk through OVS | 13:28 |
| thorst | we're going to have to use vxlans there | 13:28 |
| thorst | which is going to be weird. | 13:29 |
| thorst | efried: we'll also probably need some IT conf options for it too | 13:29 |
| thorst | something to tell us the PHYP vSwitch to use (and each CI job will use a different one I think) | 13:29 |
| efried | thorst Cool, I'll probably need a ground-up OVS primer anyway, if I'm going to have anything to do with that change set. | 13:30 |
| thorst | efried: yep...it is super weird | 13:32 |
| thorst | and contorting the CI to work with it will be...interesting | 13:32 |
| esberglu | You guys want to do a call or just discuss it here later? | 13:32 |
| thorst | probably a call | 13:32 |
| thorst | but I need to do some research first | 13:32 |
| thorst | lets get something teed up though, else I'll just keep deferring it to later | 13:32 |
| edmondsw | thorst I'd be interested to attend that | 13:32 |
| thorst | edmondsw: ack | 13:32 |
| edmondsw | ? | 13:33 |
| thorst | acknowledged | 13:33 |
| thorst | #action thorst to set up OVS meeting | 13:33 |
| edmondsw | ah... I was thinking "ack" as in "ugh" ;) | 13:33 |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 13:34 | |
| esberglu | I think that covers everything CI | 13:34 |
| jay1_ | esberglu: WSGI_MODE issue is still there ? | 13:35 |
| esberglu | Yeah still investigating a permanent solution. But using the deprecated option works for now | 13:35 |
| jay1_ | Ok.. | 13:36 |
| esberglu | #topic Driver Testing | 13:36 |
| esberglu | jay1_: Sounds like you got through your stacking issues yesterday? | 13:36 |
| efried | esberglu Yeah, couple things we ought to keep an eye on there. | 13:37 |
| jay1_ | Yes but primer lpar spawn is failing.. working with efried.. | 13:37 |
| esberglu | CI was having bad network performance yesterday, so I'm assuming your network issues were probably the same thing | 13:37 |
| efried | 1) I had to hack functions-common to use --allow-unauthenticated for apt-get. | 13:37 |
| efried | 2) git:// protocol was busted, had to change stackrc to use https | 13:37 |
| efried | And yeah, 3) the WSGI thing. | 13:38 |
| esberglu | Just adding that conf option for WSGI_MODE worked for you too correct? | 13:39 |
| efried | yes | 13:40 |
| *** svenkat has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:40 | |
| efried | And post-stack, 4) API microversion; 5) stupid cells setup | 13:40 |
| thorst | #easy #devops | 13:41 |
| efried | For CI. | 13:42 |
| efried | The rest of us poor schlubs have to do it by hand every time. | 13:42 |
| jay1_ | efried: the next SSP patch set will have most of the above mentioned fixes ?? Just wanted to understand the plan.. | 13:43 |
| efried | jay1_ Those have nothing to do with code. | 13:43 |
| thorst | I think 1-5 are permanent | 13:43 |
| thorst | semi permanent | 13:43 |
| thorst | they're just part of the cost of using devstack presently | 13:43 |
| thorst | and bleeding edge code | 13:43 |
| efried | They're all operational garbage that has to be done when you stack. | 13:43 |
| thorst | have nothing to do with PowerVM | 13:43 |
| efried | right | 13:43 |
| jay1_ | ah.. okay.. | 13:44 |
| jay1_ | but earlier these were not encountered just wondering.. | 13:44 |
| thorst | jay1_: so basically when you're dealing with bleeding edge community code | 13:45 |
| thorst | things just break | 13:45 |
| thorst | and you have to work around them | 13:46 |
| efried | jay1_ Some are (hopefully transient) issues, like the git:// protocol thing. Some are (hopefully transient) bugs, like the --allow-unauthenticated thing. Some are permanent changes made by the community that we just need to start accomodating, like the WSGI thing. | 13:46 |
| thorst | even if they're unrelated to your testing | 13:46 |
| thorst | its a constant state of turmoil | 13:46 |
| esberglu | Yep | 13:46 |
| thorst | and its how the community moves forward...kinda a no fear approach | 13:46 |
| thorst | it settles down as we get closer to release freeze | 13:46 |
| jay1_ | Ok | 13:47 |
| jay1_ | efried: These are specific to IT only ? latest OOT doesn't need all these work arounds? | 13:48 |
| efried | jay1_ Some of them. | 13:48 |
| jay1_ | of course WSGI is common one. | 13:49 |
| efried | The microversion thing should only be necessary in-tree before we have network support, because as far as I've seen, --nic none is the only thing we need that isn't supported at the default microversion. | 13:49 |
| esberglu | The rest are both | 13:50 |
| efried | But #1-3 and #5 are going to be necessary IT and OOT. | 13:50 |
| efried | yup. | 13:50 |
| jay1_ | sure. | 13:50 |
| esberglu | #topic Open Discussion | 13:51 |
| esberglu | Anything else today? | 13:51 |
| thorst | How's everyone doing? | 13:51 |
| thorst | :-p kidding | 13:51 |
| thorst | I've got nothing | 13:51 |
| jay1_ | thorst: for this iscsi, it is enough to do either with Devstack or OSA right ? | 13:52 |
| thorst | we need a live migration done with either devstack or OSA | 13:52 |
| efried | Guess you'll need two hosts. Do you have another one? | 13:52 |
| thorst | I'm now leaning towards devstack because OSA set up on the cinder side has proved to be challenging | 13:52 |
| thorst | efried: I can source another. | 13:52 |
| thorst | I just want an iscsi attach proven first to the existing system | 13:53 |
| thorst | then we can get the other ready | 13:53 |
| efried | Anyone know how to code oslo_config to load up a conf file? | 13:55 |
| esberglu | Nope | 13:55 |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:56 | |
| efried | Well, then nothing else from my end. | 13:57 |
| jay1_ | thorst: I have got another host from PVC FVT pool, for OOT + ISCSI | 13:57 |
| jay1_ | I think we may need two | 13:57 |
| thorst | jay1_: I will get you another after we get the attach going | 13:58 |
| jay1_ | as my current host is having IT now, Shall we wait until it is done ? I was just wondering to make another system ready to have simultaneous tracking.. | 14:00 |
| thorst | jay1_: testing on your current host should be wrapped up today in my opinion | 14:00 |
| efried | jay1_ I'd like to validate SSP and console IT before you blow away your current stack. | 14:00 |
| efried | thorst Yeah, unless neutron is still giving us the finger. | 14:00 |
| thorst | then we can just restack for OOT | 14:00 |
| thorst | efried: sure, but you're setting that to --none | 14:01 |
| thorst | :-) | 14:01 |
| thorst | so neutron's cut out | 14:01 |
| efried | So by the way, if you stack OOT, you can run IT on same stack. | 14:01 |
| efried | That might be the way to go, so we don't have to keep restacking all the time. | 14:01 |
| thorst | that's a nice idea | 14:02 |
| efried | thorst Are you doubting, Mr. Doubty McDoubterpants? | 14:03 |
| efried | I've done this. Just have to change the compute_driver in nova.conf and restart n-cpu. | 14:03 |
| thorst | no | 14:03 |
| thorst | no doubt...just seems logical and obvious in retrospect | 14:03 |
| thorst | just never something I considered | 14:04 |
| efried | I haven't done it a lot; and I suppose it's possible we may run into issues with the custom networking agents running when we're IT, but I wouldn't think so. | 14:05 |
| esberglu | Alright we're over time so I'm calling it | 14:06 |
| esberglu | #endmeeting | 14:06 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Apr 25 14:06:39 2017 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:06 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2017/powervm_driver_meeting.2017-04-25-13.01.html | 14:06 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2017/powervm_driver_meeting.2017-04-25-13.01.txt | 14:06 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2017/powervm_driver_meeting.2017-04-25-13.01.log.html | 14:06 |
| *** shyama has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
| a1fisher | Hi Guys, I'm seeing the following trying to privision an instance - PortBindingFailed: Binding failed for port ....., please check neutron logs for more information. - The neutron logs aren't much help. Any pointers re configuration areas I need to look at? I've configured networking as per https://github.com/openstack/networking-powervm/blob/master/doc/source/devref/usage.rst | 14:27 |
| thorst | a1fisher: what neutron client side agent are you using? | 14:27 |
| thorst | SEA, SR-IOV, OVS? | 14:27 |
| a1fisher | SEA | 14:28 |
| thorst | the networking-powervm project needs to be installed on the same server as your neutron server | 14:28 |
| thorst | and then you just need to restart your neutron server | 14:28 |
| thorst | it basically makes the server aware of how to bind that port | 14:28 |
| a1fisher | yep, done that. Is there any config that needs to be done as well? or just install. | 14:29 |
| waler | we renamed the PHYP vSwitch back to the ETHERNET0 default, like you recommended last week (and updated the bridge_mapping accordingly). But it didn't seem to help with the PortBindingFailed error | 14:33 |
| *** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:35 | |
| a1fisher | how do the openstack controllers (my neutron servers) know how to use the networking-powervm project? | 14:39 |
| efried | a1fisher Something to do with the vif type, I think. The networking-powervm agents register themselves with neutron as knowing how to handle a certain type. Then when the compute driver tries to plug a vif of that type, neutron knows where to outsource it. | 14:41 |
| efried | thorst ^^ Am I close to right on that? | 14:41 |
| efried | a1fisher Is it timing out, or failing right away? | 14:42 |
| *** shyama has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:42 | |
| a1fisher | fails pretty much right away | 14:42 |
| waler | but we did briefly catch an LPAR/VM created and then deleted on the novalink LPAR | 14:43 |
| efried | waler That makes sense. We first create the LPAR, then try to plug vifs into it. If that fails, we clean up the LPAR. | 14:44 |
| efried | Which logs have you examined at this point? | 14:44 |
| efried | I'd be looking at n-cpu, q-svc, and pvm-q-sea-agent | 14:44 |
| a1fisher | nova-compute.log is where I see the portbind error | 14:45 |
| efried | And there's nothing helpful in the neutron server log? | 14:45 |
| efried | Well, I shouldn't say "helpful" - we're looking for *any* indication that the neutron server was in the picture. | 14:46 |
| a1fisher | nope, nothing at all. I configured the agen on the client side to log but nothing useful here either. I'll have another look at the server side logs. | 14:47 |
| thorst | hey - sorry, I've been on the phone | 14:58 |
| thorst | do you have q-dhcp running? | 14:58 |
| thorst | we've seen some issues with that... | 14:58 |
| *** chas has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
| efried | thorst The symptom from that was a timeout; they're saying it fails quick for them. | 15:08 |
| thorst | failing quick indicates to me that the install on the neutron server didn't quite take right | 15:08 |
| *** mdrabe_ is now known as mdrabe | 15:08 | |
| thorst | it needs to run that setup.cfg (I think is part of the pip install) | 15:08 |
| a1fisher | We are using the neutron dhcp agent. Our environmentis an x86 cloud with 3 controllers and a number of compute nodes (x86 and powerkvm). We want to try and setup nova-link to work in the env. I can see an error in the server log. It looks like it's trying to use OVS rather then SEA. | 15:11 |
| a1fisher | WARNING neutron.plugins.ml2.drivers.mech_agent [req-cbd18f13-85df-4b9d-bfc2-f57e35f726cc 7f057635294443ed8fef8df94680581e fb83a66ea74b4d9f92100c57d72c68e7 - - -] Port 449eeffc-6a2f-46bf-b291-f50b169216ad on network 0f071065-b7ef-4a35-bcb9-de6254708f71 not bound, no agent registered on host node-p2n.hursley.ibm.com | 15:11 |
| a1fisher | ERROR neutron.plugins.ml2.managers [req-cbd18f13-85df-4b9d-bfc2-f57e35f726cc 7f057635294443ed8fef8df94680581e fb83a66ea74b4d9f92100c57d72c68e7 - - -] Failed to bind port 449eeffc-6a2f-46bf-b291-f50b169216ad on host node-p2n.hursley.ibm.com for vnic_type normal using segments [{'segmentation_id': 1003, 'physical_network': u'physnet2', 'id': u'b1327848-03f2-4a64-8dd2-fe03b37062db', 'network_type': u'vlan'}] | 15:11 |
| *** chas has joined #openstack-powervm | 15:11 | |
| a1fisher | the instal on the controllers seemed to work OK | 15:11 |
| a1fisher | I installed with "python setup.py install" | 15:14 |
| *** chas has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
| thorst | and the neutron agent is running on the NovaLink as well? | 15:16 |
| a1fisher | if you mean the networking powervm sea agent then yep it's running | 15:19 |
| a1fisher | how is the driver registered on the neutron servers? Is it just a case of installing or is there any setup post install? | 15:20 |
| *** mdrabe has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
| thorst | a1fisher: sorry...still otp | 15:32 |
| thorst | but basically the conf file points it back to the host | 15:32 |
| thorst | and simply starting it is 'registering' it | 15:32 |
| *** mdrabe has joined #openstack-powervm | 15:39 | |
| a1fisher | ok, the agent is registered and happy. We just need to figure out why the controller is trying to use OVS rather than the SEA agent. | 15:40 |
| *** a1fisher has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 16:46 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 16:52 | |
| *** jay1_ has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 17:07 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| *** chas has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:05 | |
| *** chas has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
| *** jay1_ has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:13 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 18:15 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:29 | |
| *** thorst_ has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:40 | |
| thorst_ | efried: care to look at 5180? | 18:42 |
| thorst_ | tblake is asking for it | 18:43 |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** thorst_ is now known as thorst | 18:44 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 19:07 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
| efried | thorst Done. Can't say I understand the substance, but hopefully you do. | 19:19 |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 19:21 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 19:26 | |
| thorst | efried: I don't really | 19:32 |
| thorst | I think its something PVC related | 19:32 |
| thorst | but looked harmless enough | 19:32 |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 20:01 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 20:33 | |
| *** svenkat has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
| efried | thorst 5180 final nod real quick before ya bail? | 20:59 |
| thorst | efried: on it | 21:00 |
| thorst | +2...shall I submit? | 21:01 |
| thorst | I'm hitting submit | 21:01 |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
| *** shyama has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
| *** apearson has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:36 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:38 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:39 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| *** mdrabe has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
| *** svenkat has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:46 | |
| *** dwayne has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
| *** thorst is now known as thorst_afk | 22:00 | |
| *** tjakobs has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
| *** thorst_afk has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 22:42 | |
| *** tjakobs has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
| *** dwayne has joined #openstack-powervm | 23:07 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-powervm | 23:29 | |
| *** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-powervm | 23:41 | |
| *** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 23:42 | |
| *** thorst_afk has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!