| *** boris-42 has joined #openstack-performance | 00:09 | |
| *** mdorman has quit IRC | 00:25 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 02:40 | |
| *** harshs has quit IRC | 03:08 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 03:17 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 03:22 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
| *** mageshgv has joined #openstack-performance | 04:53 | |
| *** harlowja_at_home has joined #openstack-performance | 05:48 | |
| *** pasquier-s has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
| *** pasquier-s has joined #openstack-performance | 06:14 | |
| *** boris-42 has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
| *** arnoldje has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** harlowja_at_home has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
| *** amaretskiy has joined #openstack-performance | 09:08 | |
| johnthetubaguy | curious about the local-conductor vs remote-conductor debate, upgrade is what is forcing us to change to remote-conductor | 09:45 |
|---|---|---|
| johnthetubaguy | the load would otherwise be on the compute nodes, so its not all bad, more CPU on there, if you want to load on the compute nodes, run a conductor on them all | 09:46 |
| johnthetubaguy | using pymysql should help a lot with reducing the number of conductors required | 09:46 |
| DinaBelova | johnthetubaguy - yeah, that's why we're trying to understand what's going on with the issue seen on the GoDaddy's cloud :) | 09:59 |
| johnthetubaguy | DinaBelova: yeah, agreed, I am certainly interested | 10:56 |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 11:06 | |
| DinaBelova | well, in fact I'll agree with SpamapS - on the dev env (like devstack or whatever) where metadata service is running as a part of nova-api, not the separated service nova-api-metadata on computes, metadata load I'm giving from the looped calls to the metadata service from the instances running is mostly affecting nova-api service itself rather then conductor. Afair klindgren_ mentioned they have about 32k metadata related calls in 15 | 11:57 |
| DinaBelova | mins (both nova-api-metadata and nova-ec2-metadata). That gives ~35 requests per second. Of course they have 3 servers and about 60 total workers, that will be crazy enough on my VM with 2 cores :) So I have 2 nova-conductor workers and 2 nova-api (combined with nova-api-metadata). And if I'm having about ~30 VMs running with ~8-10 nova-api-metadata calls from them and (!!!) turned off metadata cache, I have ~90-100% CPU (from 200% | 11:57 |
| DinaBelova | total) eaten by nova-api :) Nova-conductor is giving from 10% to 20% :) So it looks like I won't be able to reproduce exactly the same situation on my env, sadly. | 11:57 |
| DinaBelova | and all metadata requests to the conductor are quite fast, so I do not see too long ones like klindgren_ was seeing | 11:58 |
| *** mageshgv has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
| DinaBelova | rarely conductor has spikes up to 30-35 - but that looks like something sporadic | 12:15 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-performance | 13:53 | |
| *** msemenov has joined #openstack-performance | 14:18 | |
| *** rvasilets___ has joined #openstack-performance | 14:21 | |
| *** regXboi has joined #openstack-performance | 14:23 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 14:25 | |
| *** mriedem_away is now known as mriedem | 14:33 | |
| mriedem | we have a large ops job in the gate, | 14:54 |
| mriedem | but i don't think it's running the metadata service, | 14:55 |
| mriedem | and the tests are just booting up a bunch of servers and then waiting for them to be deleted (does that 3 times) | 14:55 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem - so nova-api-metadata is turned off fully | 14:55 |
| DinaBelova | ? | 14:55 |
| mriedem | yeah http://logs.openstack.org/98/242698/10/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops/7ceded9/logs/ | 14:56 |
| DinaBelova | neither running as a part of nova-api or separately | 14:56 |
| DinaBelova | ok | 14:56 |
| mriedem | we only run the nova metadata service in the postgres job http://logs.openstack.org/98/242698/10/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-postgres-full/eee7c06/logs/ | 14:56 |
| DinaBelova | yeah, got it | 14:56 |
| mriedem | not related to postgres, it was just another config to add that wrinkle | 14:56 |
| DinaBelova | #startmeeting Performance Team | 15:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Nov 24 15:00:15 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is DinaBelova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'performance_team' | 15:00 |
| DinaBelova | hello folks o/ | 15:00 |
| mriedem | o/ | 15:00 |
| bauzas | \o | 15:00 |
| DinaBelova | todays agenda located here | 15:00 |
| DinaBelova | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Performance#Agenda_for_next_meeting | 15:00 |
| *** redixin has joined #openstack-performance | 15:00 | |
| *** Augie has joined #openstack-performance | 15:01 | |
| DinaBelova | let's wait for few more moments for others to come :) | 15:01 |
| kun_huang | o/ | 15:01 |
| * regXboi stumbles in and finds a corner to fall asleep in | 15:01 | |
| andreykurilin | hi Dina | 15:01 |
| *** boris-42 has joined #openstack-performance | 15:01 | |
| Augie | hello Dina | 15:02 |
| DinaBelova | hello folks! | 15:02 |
| *** temujin_ has joined #openstack-performance | 15:02 | |
| DinaBelova | so let's start with action items :) | 15:02 |
| DinaBelova | #topic Action Items | 15:02 |
| DinaBelova | last time we had several ones | 15:02 |
| temujin_ | hi all | 15:02 |
| DinaBelova | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2015/performance_team.2015-11-17-15.00.html | 15:03 |
| boris-42 | hi | 15:03 |
| DinaBelova | temujin_, boris-42 o/ | 15:03 |
| DinaBelova | let's start with boris-42 action item - update osprofiler spec to fit Mitaka cycle | 15:03 |
| DinaBelova | that was done :) | 15:03 |
| DinaBelova | boris-42 - please send the link here :) | 15:03 |
| *** temujin_ is now known as oanufriev__ | 15:03 | |
| regXboi | DinaBelova, boris-42: do we expect another respin? | 15:04 |
| andreykurilin | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825/ | 15:04 |
| DinaBelova | andreykurilin - ah, thanks - I was looking for it | 15:04 |
| *** rohanion has joined #openstack-performance | 15:04 | |
| *** rohanion is now known as rohanion_ | 15:04 | |
| *** rohanion has joined #openstack-performance | 15:05 | |
| *** rohanion has left #openstack-performance | 15:05 | |
| DinaBelova | regXboi - do you mean new era of osprofiler? :) | 15:05 |
| DinaBelova | or what? | 15:05 |
| rvasilets___ | hi | 15:05 |
| boris-42 | regXboi: some kind of that=) | 15:06 |
| DinaBelova | rvasilets___ o/ | 15:06 |
| * regXboi added an ask for the next respin of 103825 | 15:06 | |
| * regXboi just wondering if it has a chance of being added | 15:06 | |
| DinaBelova | regXboi - I believe yes | 15:06 |
| DinaBelova | last time this spec was active there were lots of +es there | 15:06 |
| DinaBelova | most of the comments were regarding spelling, tc | 15:07 |
| DinaBelova | etc* | 15:07 |
| regXboi | ok, let me try again - I added a comment to PS7 of 103825 asking for an additional future to be added to the spec | 15:07 |
| regXboi | I want to know if that will be added to PS8 or if I have to look at spinning a new patch set to modify this if it merges | 15:07 |
| DinaBelova | regXboi - sadly don't know. boris-42 ? | 15:08 |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 15:08 | |
| * regXboi waves at dims_ | 15:09 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 15:09 | |
| dims_ | hi regXboi | 15:09 |
| DinaBelova | regXboi - well, I don't know still. Need closer look on current PS to undertsand if that info was added | 15:09 |
| regXboi | DinaBelova: no worries, we can move on | 15:10 |
| DinaBelova | ok, cool | 15:10 |
| DinaBelova | one more action item regarding this etherpad | 15:10 |
| DinaBelova | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rally_scenarios_list | 15:10 |
| DinaBelova | some info from IBM folks appeared here :) | 15:10 |
| DinaBelova | cool :) | 15:10 |
| DinaBelova | although still want to see it updated by yahoo for instance (pink harlowja_ ) | 15:11 |
| DinaBelova | ping* | 15:11 |
| DinaBelova | also I'll ping some Intel folks for them to fill this etherpad as well | 15:11 |
| DinaBelova | but we see the progress has started | 15:11 |
| DinaBelova | and then several items on me | 15:11 |
| DinaBelova | the first one about writing the email to openstack-operators mailing list about various ratios | 15:12 |
| DinaBelova | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-November/008846.html | 15:12 |
| DinaBelova | I pinged Kristian from ATT - he was not able to meet yet with ATT performance group to find out feedback on rally | 15:12 |
| DinaBelova | kun_huang - and I loved the video you've shared last time very much | 15:13 |
| DinaBelova | I believe eventually we need performance benchmarking like that automated in gates | 15:13 |
| DinaBelova | for various projects | 15:13 |
| DinaBelova | #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0qlsH1hoKs | 15:13 |
| DinaBelova | for folks who did not see it yet ^^ | 15:13 |
| DinaBelova | it's about neutron performance benchmarking from commit to commit | 15:14 |
| kun_huang | DinaBelova: +1, Kevid did a good job with rally | 15:14 |
| DinaBelova | kun_huang indeed | 15:14 |
| DinaBelova | so that's it with action items from last time | 15:14 |
| DinaBelova | let's move forward I guess now :) | 15:14 |
| DinaBelova | any objectives? | 15:14 |
| DinaBelova | k | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | #topic Team Work Items | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja_ has proposed really interesting idea during last week | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | he proposed to collect list of work items for performance team | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | that new comers (or members) can pick from | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | I've added section https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/perf-zoom-zoom | 15:16 |
| DinaBelova | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/perf-zoom-zoom | 15:16 |
| *** mdorman has joined #openstack-performance | 15:16 | |
| DinaBelova | called "Work Items to grab" | 15:16 |
| DinaBelova | and added two osprofiler specs to work on there | 15:16 |
| DinaBelova | and I'm kindly encouraging people to add bugs, issues, investigations to be done, tests to be run here | 15:17 |
| DinaBelova | I believe I'll need to send the email to openstack-operators mailing list about it as well | 15:17 |
| DinaBelova | regXboi, Augie, mriedem - so if you have anything hot to take a look on - please put your thoughts there | 15:18 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 15:18 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-performance | 15:18 | |
| DinaBelova | #action DinaBelova write an email about work items to the openstack-dev and openstack-operators | 15:18 |
| Augie | Dina - OK, will do | 15:18 |
| DinaBelova | Augie - thanks :) | 15:18 |
| regXboi | ack | 15:18 |
| mriedem | yeah, need ML, can't keep track of the bazillion etherpads | 15:19 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem for sure :) | 15:19 |
| DinaBelova | will do | 15:19 |
| DinaBelova | I really hope that list of concrete items to work on can attract more people here | 15:19 |
| DinaBelova | and some hands that can work on specific points | 15:19 |
| DinaBelova | not something abstract like 'some' testing or whatever | 15:20 |
| DinaBelova | any questions regarding this topic? | 15:20 |
| *** Nikolay_St has joined #openstack-performance | 15:20 | |
| DinaBelova | ok | 15:20 |
| DinaBelova | so let's move forward (although today I feel like I'm having mostly monologue :)) | 15:21 |
| DinaBelova | #topic Nova-conductor performance issues | 15:21 |
| DinaBelova | hot topic :) | 15:21 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so about latest news | 15:21 |
| DinaBelova | I've tried to reproduce this issue on my dev env - sadly, that try was not very successful :( | 15:22 |
| mriedem | so one idea is running the n-api-meta service in the large ops job in the gate | 15:22 |
| *** arnoldje has joined #openstack-performance | 15:22 | |
| DinaBelova | In fact my nova-api service (containing nova-api-metadata inside) started eating CPU much faster than conductor | 15:22 |
| mriedem | that job uses the nova fake virt driver though, so i'm not sure if some extra plumbing would be needed there to tickle it | 15:23 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem - I believe that will be useful | 15:23 |
| DinaBelova | in case of fake driver - yeah, I believe it'll be needed | 15:23 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem - I'll take a look on this faking as well on my env first of all | 15:23 |
| DinaBelova | and then let's see if that will be more or less easy or not | 15:24 |
| DinaBelova | don't think in fact :( | 15:24 |
| mriedem | wasn't SpamapS or someone talking about the nova fake virt driver yesterday? | 15:24 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem - yep, we were talking about this | 15:24 |
| DinaBelova | but we have feeling it won't be very easy | 15:25 |
| mriedem | fwiw, adding n-api-meta to a large ops type config should be easy enough, would be a separate job maybe | 15:25 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem -ack | 15:25 |
| mriedem | i could poke on testing that out with a devstack-gate change, or talk to sdague about it | 15:25 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem - that will be super-nice | 15:25 |
| mriedem | i'll add a todo | 15:25 |
| DinaBelova | mriedem thanks | 15:26 |
| DinaBelova | #action mriedem testing that out with a devstack-gate n-api-meta to a large ops type config change, or talk to sdague about it | 15:26 |
| DinaBelova | fyi right now I'm testing profiling periodical task | 15:27 |
| DinaBelova | for conductor | 15:27 |
| DinaBelova | on my env - if it works ok, I'll ask klindgren_ to run it as well | 15:27 |
| DinaBelova | I guess that will add some info here as well (as right now I see much more load on the nova-metadata-api than on the conductor itself) | 15:27 |
| DinaBelova | so probably something else is happening on their cloud we just don't know about | 15:28 |
| DinaBelova | ok, any additional ideas for me on what to look at here? | 15:28 |
| DinaBelova | k, let's move forward | 15:29 |
| DinaBelova | #topic OSProfiler weekly update | 15:29 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so about profiler - we have new version of the spec proposed by boris-42 - thanks :) | 15:30 |
| DinaBelova | and currently the most interesting chain on review is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247005/ | 15:30 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: heh that one is big | 15:31 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 15:31 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: maybe we should split it to 2 patches | 15:31 |
| DinaBelova | boris-42 - yep, possibly | 15:31 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: one that adds strucutre of drivers | 15:31 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: another that implements ceilometer on it | 15:31 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: it will be simpler to review this to logical piece | 15:32 |
| DinaBelova | I want to finish first my debug of what's going wrong with the adding osprofiler timestamps to the notifications | 15:32 |
| DinaBelova | and then I can do that, yep | 15:32 |
| DinaBelova | thanks | 15:32 |
| DinaBelova | #action DinaBelova split https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247005/ to two commits: adding drivers structure and adding ceilometer driver | 15:32 |
| DinaBelova | anyway I encourage everyone here to review what's currently available | 15:33 |
| DinaBelova | kun_huang, harlowja_, SpamapS - you're welcome :) | 15:33 |
| DinaBelova | and, as said, there are two more specs to work on | 15:34 |
| DinaBelova | they're listed here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/perf-zoom-zoom | 15:34 |
| DinaBelova | and they still do not have any assignee :) | 15:34 |
| DinaBelova | so please try working through them :) | 15:34 |
| DinaBelova | any questions / ideas regarding osprofiler? | 15:35 |
| DinaBelova | boris-42? | 15:35 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: reading | 15:35 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: no question about osprofiler=) | 15:35 |
| DinaBelova | :D for you I've prepared option 'ideas' | 15:36 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 15:36 |
| DinaBelova | ok, cool :) | 15:36 |
| DinaBelova | Today we're having super-fast meeting :) | 15:36 |
| DinaBelova | #topic Open Discussion | 15:36 |
| DinaBelova | here I just wanted to share the recent news with you, folks | 15:37 |
| DinaBelova | currently performance team inside Mirantis is working on various researches | 15:37 |
| DinaBelova | currently mostly around components like DB, MQ, Ceph, etc. | 15:37 |
| DinaBelova | and we're preparing the testing plans to be shared with you, guys | 15:38 |
| DinaBelova | I hope they will be available before the end of week | 15:38 |
| DinaBelova | and then I'll kindly ask you folks to give some feedback on what else and how can be tested here | 15:38 |
| DinaBelova | I'll ping kun_huang, harlowja_, SpamapS, mriedem, Augie, klindgren_ and others here and will write an email about that as well | 15:39 |
| DinaBelova | your feedback will be essential - if any, we can add your items / test cases to the testing as well | 15:40 |
| DinaBelova | k, any other topics, ideas or issues to be discussed? | 15:40 |
| DinaBelova | I'm feeling like I was disconnected and talking with myself for a while :) | 15:41 |
| Augie | Dina - that's great on the testing plans... Do you expect to use an environment withing Mirantis for the testing? | 15:41 |
| Augie | withing = within | 15:41 |
| DinaBelova | Augie - yep, currently we're having not very big lab available | 15:41 |
| DinaBelova | hoping to grab ~500 compute nodes close to the New Year | 15:42 |
| DinaBelova | but this env will be Mirantis-available now | 15:42 |
| Augie | any thoughts on potential use of that Intel/Rackspace environment? | 15:42 |
| *** Kristian__ has joined #openstack-performance | 15:43 | |
| DinaBelova | Augie - in terms of Mirantis and Intel coop we're planning to use it, but right now we are not using their super-big envs :) | 15:44 |
| DinaBelova | so yep, it's planned | 15:44 |
| Kristian__ | dina- here's latest Agile use case/feedback from my Rally development team@ t. being use case: as a test developer/executioner I want Rally to ramp up threads/users gradually over a configurable time period until reaching a target load so that tests with large loads a) do not have a sudden load impact on systems and b) a test can gradually increase until a breakpoint is found, instead of having to run subsequent tes | 15:44 |
| Augie | Dina - ok | 15:44 |
| DinaBelova | Kristian__ o/ | 15:44 |
| DinaBelova | boris-42 ^^ please take a look and comment :) | 15:45 |
| Kristian__ | finding breakpoints in OS deployment are crucial to us | 15:45 |
| DinaBelova | Kristian__ - so you want something like growing load pattern tests - am I right? | 15:45 |
| Kristian__ | yes, so to paraphrase a bit- if rally detects load is too large at first, test can scale back at smaller load intervals then grow to higher load patterns until max load/errors based on SLA start forming | 15:47 |
| DinaBelova | boris-42, are you around? | 15:47 |
| andreykurilin | Kristian__: we have something like this in rally roadmap | 15:48 |
| Kristian__ | so can stay for a bit, Boris knows how to reach me....i've got an open door for him | 15:48 |
| DinaBelova | andreykurilin, a-ha, can you share the estimates on when this integration is planned? | 15:48 |
| Kristian__ | ok. @andreykurilin - which version is this expected in? | 15:48 |
| andreykurilin | I can give you any estimations. As far as I know, there are no activities on this type of runner. Let's move this topic for next meeting | 15:49 |
| andreykurilin | *I can't | 15:49 |
| DinaBelova | andreykurilin, ack | 15:50 |
| DinaBelova | #acion andreykurilin find out the estimates on when growing load pattern tests runner will be available in Rally | 15:50 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so it looks like we're done here | 15:51 |
| andreykurilin | #action andreykurilin find out the estimates on when growing load pattern tests runner will be available in Rally | 15:51 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 15:51 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so two action items on you :) | 15:51 |
| DinaBelova | anything else to be discussed? | 15:51 |
| andreykurilin | no, your action item doesn't have char "t" | 15:51 |
| andreykurilin | :) | 15:51 |
| DinaBelova | ah :) | 15:51 |
| DinaBelova | you're right :) | 15:51 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so I guess that's it for today | 15:52 |
| DinaBelova | thanks everyone for coming and taking part :) | 15:52 |
| mriedem | thanks | 15:52 |
| DinaBelova | #endmeeting | 15:52 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Nov 24 15:52:18 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:52 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2015/performance_team.2015-11-24-15.00.html | 15:52 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2015/performance_team.2015-11-24-15.00.txt | 15:52 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2015/performance_team.2015-11-24-15.00.log.html | 15:52 |
| Kristian__ | ty @DinaBelova and @andreykurilin | 15:52 |
| *** Kristian__ has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
| *** rohanion_ has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
| *** Augie has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
| *** tdurakov has joined #openstack-performance | 15:55 | |
| klindgren_ | doh - earl meeting | 15:56 |
| klindgren_ | early* | 15:56 |
| *** rfolco_ has joined #openstack-performance | 16:03 | |
| *** tdurakov has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| DinaBelova | :D | 16:06 |
| DinaBelova | I guess we need revote on moving it to one hour later :) | 16:06 |
| DinaBelova | to make it more US friendly :) | 16:06 |
| DinaBelova | klindgren_ and harlowja_ I guess will be happy :) | 16:06 |
| klindgren_ | it wasn't in my schedule is all - but I normally start work around this time so +1 hour would rock :-D | 16:13 |
| kun_huang | DinaBelova: is it possible to organize a team like openstack-security? | 16:21 |
| DinaBelova | kun_huang - do you mean official openstack team working on performance issues? | 16:24 |
| *** harshs has joined #openstack-performance | 16:24 | |
| kun_huang | DinaBelova: yep | 16:25 |
| DinaBelova | I've spoken about it with Thierry - he told, that we need to start with non-official working group like API working group for instance - so in fact it is what's we are now - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Category:Working_Groups - here you can see Performance Team as well | 16:26 |
| DinaBelova | and then after some work | 16:26 |
| DinaBelova | and results | 16:26 |
| DinaBelova | team may become acknowledged by the TC | 16:27 |
| DinaBelova | kun_huang ^^ | 16:27 |
| DinaBelova | so we need to continue working and collect results of our work :) once there will be some of them, we can become acknowledged by the TC and become official OpenStack team | 16:27 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: load growing runner will be soon | 16:29 |
| DinaBelova | boris-42 - wow, cool :) | 16:29 |
| DinaBelova | is it scheduled for some of rally releases? | 16:29 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234195/ | 16:29 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: something like this | 16:29 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: nope it is not scheduled=) | 16:29 |
| DinaBelova | :) yeah, once it'll be merged - yep? :) | 16:29 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: but it won't be based on SLAs | 16:29 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: that thing that is asked by Kristian will be later | 16:30 |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
| DinaBelova | ok, cool | 16:30 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: but I have some thoughts | 16:31 |
| boris-42 | DinaBelova: in any case it's not the most high priority for me now | 16:31 |
| DinaBelova | ack, gotcha | 16:32 |
| * notmorgan is curious why the meetings happen in this channel instead of -meeting channels? | 16:42 | |
| DinaBelova | notmorgan - we used the same practice Large Deploymetns team is using - they are having meetings on #openstack-operators channel simply because there are too many meetings already on the *-meeting chanels and that will b really hard to find the timeslot good both for the channels and people. in fact right now any official openstack irc channel can be used for meetings if meetbot is monitoring it | 16:45 |
| *** tdurakov has joined #openstack-performance | 16:45 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 16:46 | |
| notmorgan | right. just the -meeting channels tend to have more eyes and often have more people involved than the more isolated local channels | 16:47 |
| * notmorgan also has stopped lurking the the -meeting channels anyway, but... | 16:47 | |
| notmorgan | that is aside | 16:47 |
| notmorgan | just was curious | 16:47 |
| DinaBelova | notmorgan - yeah, official channels have more eyes on them definitely... but timeslots available for both european, chinese and US timezones are very busy there :) | 16:48 |
| DinaBelova | although even ours is late for Asia | 16:49 |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 17:18 | |
| *** regXboi has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
| *** tdurakov has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
| *** harshs has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
| *** amaretskiy has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
| harlowja_ | DinaBelova hi! | 17:51 |
| harlowja_ | lol | 17:51 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja_, morning sir :) | 17:51 |
| harlowja_ | i sorta slept in, oops, was working late on/messing around with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244376/ :-P | 17:52 |
| harlowja_ | DinaBelova morning lady! | 17:52 |
| harlowja_ | actually i don't think its morning, ha | 17:52 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 17:52 |
| DinaBelova | 9PM here :) | 17:52 |
| harlowja_ | boris-42 what u doing | 17:52 |
| harlowja_ | DinaBelova evening lady! | 17:52 |
| harlowja_ | lol | 17:52 |
| harlowja_ | there fixed it :-P | 17:52 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja_ lol | 17:52 |
| harlowja_ | :) | 17:54 |
| harlowja_ | +1 DinaBelova looks like a useful meeting, sorry i sorta slept past it :-/ | 17:55 |
| harlowja_ | "Work Items to grab" + 2 | 17:55 |
| harlowja_ | next meeting, i guess after US thanksgiving perhaps I can not sleep in and talk about how to create a place for sharing rally results | 17:55 |
| harlowja_ | boris-42 will make the site for us, and we can find a place to host it and get people to easily upload rally results (hopefully frequently...) | 17:56 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 17:57 |
| harlowja_ | right boris-42 ???!!?? :-P | 17:57 |
| *** rvasilets___ has quit IRC | 17:59 | |
| boris-42 | harlowja_: =)))) | 18:04 |
| harlowja_ | ;) | 18:05 |
| harlowja_ | that means yes boris-42 | 18:05 |
| harlowja_ | DinaBelova so we have a site-designer now, lol | 18:05 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja_ - you need to be the sales person, what the hell are you doing among devs? :) | 18:06 |
| harlowja_ | lol | 18:06 |
| harlowja_ | someone has to write all these libraries :-P | 18:06 |
| harlowja_ | *these oslo/other libraries | 18:06 |
| harlowja_ | boris-42 does rally produce output in a parseable format, like json or a zip file or something that people can upload | 18:08 |
| harlowja_ | i'm assuming yes | 18:08 |
| harlowja_ | but just want to check | 18:08 |
| harlowja_ | (i should really get around to messing more around with rally) | 18:08 |
| boris-42 | harlowja_: yep it produces results in raw json | 18:10 |
| harlowja_ | ok, many json files or just one? | 18:10 |
| * harlowja_ just thinking of a simple archive format people could upload | 18:10 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 18:17 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-performance | 18:21 | |
| *** harshs has joined #openstack-performance | 18:30 | |
| *** tdurakov has joined #openstack-performance | 18:38 | |
| *** tdurakov has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
| *** tdurakov has joined #openstack-performance | 19:10 | |
| *** regXboi has joined #openstack-performance | 19:46 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 19:53 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 19:56 | |
| *** arnoldje has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
| *** rfolco_ has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
| *** arnoldje has joined #openstack-performance | 20:14 | |
| harlowja_ | boris-42 is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825 basically asking for oslo to take in osprofiler? | 20:17 |
| harlowja_ | lots of other stuff there, but is it primiarily oslo adopt it? | 20:17 |
| harlowja_ | i get the how it works stuff, so just wondering :-P | 20:18 |
| dims | harlowja_ : does it say what we need to do in Oslo? | 20:22 |
| harlowja_ | dims no, but i know boris-42 has been told to go put that spec in like 25 places | 20:22 |
| harlowja_ | and its in oslo-specs now | 20:22 |
| harlowja_ | so i'm just wondering | 20:22 |
| * harlowja_ personally has no issue doing that, if thats the desire | 20:23 | |
| * harlowja_ would rather not have boris-42 need to move that spec for the 26th time because people can't commit to things... | 20:27 | |
| dims | harlowja_ y i was just looking for what to do :) | 20:27 |
| harlowja_ | dims partially me to ;) | 20:28 |
| harlowja_ | its a nice overview of it all so thats cool :-P | 20:28 |
| harlowja_ | would be a nice sphinx doc page if its not already | 20:28 |
| harlowja_ | https://github.com/openstack/osprofiler/blob/master/README.rst is a little hairy (to much info) imho | 20:29 |
| mriedem | does anyone here care about the performance of nova's unshelve operation? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135387/ | 20:51 |
| *** redixin has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
| *** regXboi has quit IRC | 21:25 | |
| *** badari has joined #openstack-performance | 21:26 | |
| *** redixin has joined #openstack-performance | 21:30 | |
| *** tdurakov has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
| *** arnoldje has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 21:38 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 21:48 | |
| *** boris-42 has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| *** moravec has joined #openstack-performance | 21:50 | |
| *** arnoldje has joined #openstack-performance | 22:03 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
| *** redixin has quit IRC | 23:02 | |
| *** harshs has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| *** redixin has joined #openstack-performance | 23:05 | |
| *** harshs has joined #openstack-performance | 23:08 | |
| *** boris-42 has joined #openstack-performance | 23:10 | |
| boris-42 | harlowja_: for now it is single json | 23:12 |
| harlowja_ | boris-42 k | 23:12 |
| boris-42 | harlowja_: in future it may be many files with crapy organization | 23:12 |
| harlowja_ | lol | 23:12 |
| harlowja_ | k | 23:12 |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 23:28 | |
| *** redixin has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!