Monday, 2020-10-26

*** tosky has quit IRC00:28
*** rcernin has quit IRC03:09
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo03:14
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-oslo05:42
*** sboyron has joined #openstack-oslo06:55
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-oslo07:03
*** rcernin has quit IRC07:41
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau07:57
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo08:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC08:07
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-oslo08:11
*** brinzhang has quit IRC08:14
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo08:20
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo08:23
*** rcernin has quit IRC08:26
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo08:33
*** sboyron has quit IRC09:13
*** sboyron has joined #openstack-oslo09:20
*** hberaud has quit IRC09:22
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo09:22
*** rcernin has quit IRC09:39
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo09:59
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.policy master: Remove format option examples in policy generator  https://review.opendev.org/75896610:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC10:04
*** zzzeek has quit IRC10:15
openstackgerritDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.messaging stable/train: add min of 1 to rpc_conn_pool_size  https://review.opendev.org/75941010:17
*** zzzeek has joined #openstack-oslo10:18
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo10:23
moguimaryoctozepto, any progress on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/755406/ ?10:28
moguimarI have a keystone patch that depends on that one10:28
moguimarcan you help me untangle it?10:28
moguimargmann ^10:29
openstackgerritDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.messaging stable/train: add min of 1 to rpc_conn_pool_size  https://review.opendev.org/75941010:33
*** rcernin has quit IRC10:33
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo10:37
yoctozeptomoguimar: let's move to #openstack-qa10:40
*** rcernin has quit IRC10:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.reports master: Remove all six usage  https://review.opendev.org/75798110:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.metrics master: bump py37 to py38 in tox.ini  https://review.opendev.org/75743911:09
*** tosky has joined #openstack-oslo11:25
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo11:37
*** rcernin has quit IRC11:42
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur11:47
*** raildo has joined #openstack-oslo11:59
*** adrianc has quit IRC12:13
*** adrianc has joined #openstack-oslo12:14
*** hberaud has quit IRC12:39
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo12:52
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-oslo12:52
*** cognifloyd has joined #openstack-oslo12:52
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo13:08
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo13:10
openstackgerritDavid Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Adding --check-defaults to validator  https://review.opendev.org/75933813:15
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-oslo13:16
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-oslo13:22
*** rcernin has quit IRC13:35
bnemecHey, due to the time change I have a conflict with the Oslo meeting for a couple of weeks here. I should be semi-available, but you might need to ping me if something needs my input.13:55
*** cognifloyd has quit IRC13:57
hberaudbnemec: ack13:59
hberaudbnemec: thanks for the heads up13:59
*** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-oslo14:06
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC14:07
*** hberaud has quit IRC14:26
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo14:27
*** cognifloyd has joined #openstack-oslo14:46
hberaud#startmeeting oslo15:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Oct 26 15:00:42 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'15:00
hberaudCourtesy ping for bnemec, smcginnis, moguimar, johnsom, stephenfin, bcafarel, kgiusti, jungleboyj, sboyron, damani15:01
moguimaro/15:01
bcafarelo/ (sharing attention with neutron ptg session)15:01
hberaud#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting15:01
johnsomo/15:02
kgiustio/15:03
hberaud#topic Red flags for/from liaisons15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:04
hberaudnothing from our side15:04
johnsomNothing from Octavia15:04
sboyrono/15:04
moguimarnothing from Barbican15:05
hberaud#topic Releases liaison15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Releases liaison (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:06
bnemeco/15:06
hberaudI seen few releases proposed by damani15:06
hberaudnothing more here15:06
hberaud#topic Security liaison15:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Security liaison (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:07
bnemecJust the gerrit breach audit, which was completed without incident.15:07
hberaudright15:07
sboyronyep15:07
bnemecThanks to everyone who helped out with that!15:08
hberaud+115:08
hberaud#topic TaCT SIG liaison15:08
*** openstack changes topic to "TaCT SIG liaison (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:08
*** ralonsoh_ is now known as ralonsoh15:08
sboyronNothing is on fire15:08
hberaudawesome15:08
sboyronor the fire for gerrit breach masked everything ^^15:09
sboyrondid not saw any mails15:09
hberaud:)15:09
hberaud#topic Action items from last meeting15:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Action items from last meeting (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:09
hberaudjust 1 thing here15:10
hberaudhberaud to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/74216015:10
hberauddone15:10
hberaud#topic Weekly Wayward Wallaby Review15:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Weekly Wayward Wallaby Review (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:10
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/698814/15:11
hberaudthis one is WIP since 201915:12
hberaudI wonder if we should abandon these changes15:12
hberaudsmcginnis: any opinion? ^^^15:12
smcginnisWould be great to see that work done if anyone can take it on. It would be nice to have.15:13
hberaudack15:13
smcginnisBut if no one else can tackle it, we should probably just abandon it.15:13
hberaudI'll try to take a look more deeply to this one15:14
hberaud#topic Open discussion15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:14
hberaudanything else?15:14
hberaudmoguimar: you proposed to run our retrospective, maybe it's the right time15:15
hberaudmoguimar: as you want15:15
moguimarsure15:15
moguimardo you have the link for the ptg?15:15
moguimarmaybe we have some topics there already?15:15
hberaudyep sec15:16
hberaud#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oslo-wallaby-topics15:16
hberaudso few items are in the "what went well" part15:17
moguimarok15:17
moguimarlets start with What went well15:18
moguimar#topic Retrospective - What went well15:18
moguimarno powers =P15:18
moguimarzuulv3 migration15:18
moguimarcomments?15:18
bnemecI included this because it got done on time and a number of different people contributed to it.15:19
hberaudAFAIK this topic is well done15:19
moguimartosky, around?15:19
bnemecPretty much exactly how we want community goals to work.15:19
moguimarcool15:20
bnemecAnd yeah, big thanks to tosky for driving that!15:20
moguimarwhat do you mean in time bnemec ?15:20
moguimarlike early in the cycle?15:20
hberaudI suppose during the cycle15:20
bnemecYeah. We weren't desperately merging patches late in the cycle, or even after it was over.15:21
hberaudthis was a community goal15:21
bnemecWhich has happened on other community goals.15:21
moguimarok15:21
moguimarmoving on15:21
moguimarhberaud took over most of the release duties15:21
moguimarhberaud++15:21
bnemecI guess this was kind of our first step toward the DPL model.15:21
moguimarspeaking of that, did we get a new oslo.utils release?15:22
hberaudbnemec: yep I agreed15:22
hberauddamani: ^^^ (I'm not sure)15:23
moguimaryeah, I think damani started working on that one15:23
hberaudI think too, but I didn't seen related release for now15:23
moguimarany other things that went well?15:24
moguimarI have one that is mixed feelings15:24
moguimarthe pre-commit patches15:25
hberaud:)15:25
moguimarIt covered 35 repos I guess15:25
hberaudyeah15:25
moguimarwe were able to kinda automate a good part of it15:25
moguimarit was very good to first get good in a single repo and then replicating15:25
hberaudyep15:26
moguimarthe part I'm not sure it was that good was how long it took to get it reviewed15:26
moguimarnot sure about it*15:26
moguimarwhich is a sign that we are going short on cores15:27
hberaudAgreed15:27
hberaudfortunately new few people seems interested by oslo15:28
moguimarI think we planted a good seed15:28
hberaud+115:28
moguimarlets see how pre-commit will affect our work in the next cycles15:28
bnemecI know last cycle I had toyed with the idea of changing our approval process to only require one +2 on a change submitted by a core.15:29
hberaudit could be dangerous15:29
bnemecI kind of tabled it because it seemed like we were keeping up on reviews okay.15:29
moguimarIn that case me and hberaud could have taken care of pre-commit alone15:30
moguimarwhat do you think could be dangerous about it hberaud ?15:30
hberaudyep15:30
hberaudI'm not fan15:31
hberaudpre-commit isn't a good example15:31
bnemecFWIW, you wouldn't _have_ to single approve if the change was complex or anything like that.15:31
moguimarI see15:31
bnemecIt would just leave it up to the core team's discretion whether to use that.15:31
bnemecOur disagreement rate in Oslo is pretty low, so in practice I don't think there would be a huge change in quality as a result.15:32
bnemecIt's not all that common that a core +2's something and another comes along and -1's.15:33
hberaudbut by example on oslo.messaging I really prefer to see double check from an expert (kgiusti) rather merge patch too quickly to compensate for a lack of person15:33
bnemecAnyway, it's something to think about. We don't necessarily have to make a decision immediately.15:33
hberaudsure15:33
moguimarok15:33
moguimarmoving on15:33
moguimarWhat didn't go well15:33
moguimarfocal ci migration15:34
bnemecThis was on me.15:34
moguimarI think this is a good example of goal happening late during the cycle15:34
bnemecI dropped the ball on this because I wasn't paying enough attention to the goal update emails.15:34
bnemecYeah.15:34
hberaud:)15:34
bnemecWe shouldn't have been making major ci changes as late as we did.15:34
hberaudagreed15:35
bnemecI guess the silver lining is that post-ff there wasn't a lot that should have been merging anyway so it didn't matter if ci got broken for a while. ;-)15:35
bnemecAnd I guess the takeaway from this is to make sure we have someone who owns community goals so someone is making sure they get done.15:36
hberaudany idea about how to manage this with the DPL?15:37
bnemecWe saw the effect of that this cycle: the zuul migration got done because tosky took ownership of it, focal didn't because nobody had a specific interest in it.15:37
bnemecI think we just need to make sure as a team that when community goals are assigned, someone takes responsibility for driving it.15:38
hberaudack15:38
bnemecWhich I'm pretty sure is the same thing I said last cycle when this happened, and then didn't follow through on it. :-/15:38
hberaudI see15:39
bnemecI will also note that since the privsep conversion goal was selected for Wallaby, we're likely to need a point of contact for other teams.15:40
hberaudgood point15:41
hberaudPersonally I'll try to be a little more attentive to community goal and the privsep stuff for this cycle15:43
bnemecI guess I don't have anything else. That was all the topics I had for the retro. Any thoughts from the rest of the team on things that didn't go well?15:43
bnemechberaud: Cool, thanks! I'll try to help out with the privsep stuff as much as I can, but I can't make any promises.15:43
hberaudno problem15:44
bnemecHopefully I've done enough work in privsep to answer some of the basic questions, at least.15:44
hberaudthanks15:44
moguimarThat's all on my end too15:44
hberaudanybody else is interested to become the bnemec's backup on this topic?15:45
hberaudthe last topic on our etherpad lack of present author15:46
hberaudso I think we are near from the end15:47
hberaudanything else?15:47
bnemecThat sounds like a spec to me.15:47
hberaudyep15:47
bnemecAnd we'll want kgiusti to look at it.15:47
hberaudI left a comment15:48
hberaudI hope he will seen it15:49
hberaudso I think we are done15:49
hberaudThanks for joining!15:49
hberaud#endmeeting15:49
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Common Libraries | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo"15:49
openstackMeeting ended Mon Oct 26 15:49:56 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:49
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2020/oslo.2020-10-26-15.00.html15:49
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2020/oslo.2020-10-26-15.00.txt15:49
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2020/oslo.2020-10-26-15.00.log.html15:50
toskyuh, thanks! (despite the PTG, I'm on vacation today)15:53
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC16:06
*** Luzi has quit IRC16:19
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk17:09
*** sboyron has quit IRC17:13
*** sboyron has joined #openstack-oslo17:15
*** tosky has quit IRC17:17
*** sboyron has quit IRC17:24
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk17:44
*** cognifloyd has quit IRC18:00
*** hamalq has joined #openstack-oslo18:23
*** hberaud has quit IRC19:44
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo20:11
*** hberaud has quit IRC20:36
*** tosky has joined #openstack-oslo20:43
*** melwitt has quit IRC20:45
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo20:49
*** qizhangapp has joined #openstack-oslo20:50
qizhangappHi, I have some questions about contributing to the documentation. I found some grammar issues and wanted to fix them. Should I submit a bug to track them or just make the changes and submit them for review?20:54
openstackgerritJacek Tomasiak proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Reset eventlet hub after patching  https://review.opendev.org/75524520:55
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo21:00
*** rcernin has quit IRC21:01
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo21:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC21:10
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-oslo21:31
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo21:34
*** rcernin has quit IRC21:43
*** hberaud has quit IRC21:54
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo22:00
*** rcernin has quit IRC22:06
*** qizhangapp has quit IRC22:07
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo22:22
*** rcernin has quit IRC22:22
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo22:22
*** rcernin has quit IRC22:32
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo22:33
*** tkajinam has quit IRC22:55
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-oslo22:55
*** tosky has quit IRC23:28

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!