Monday, 2019-05-13

*** altlogbot_0 has quit IRC00:50
*** altlogbot_1 has joined #openstack-oslo00:55
*** ileixe has quit IRC01:03
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo01:41
*** bobh has quit IRC03:45
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-oslo04:42
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-oslo04:43
*** jaosorior has quit IRC04:52
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-oslo05:00
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo05:16
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-oslo05:39
*** starborn has joined #openstack-oslo05:49
*** lpetrut has quit IRC05:55
*** aojea has joined #openstack-oslo06:01
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-oslo06:06
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-oslo06:16
*** lpetrut has quit IRC06:22
*** e0ne has quit IRC06:29
*** rcernin has quit IRC07:06
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-oslo07:17
*** yan0s has joined #openstack-oslo07:21
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-oslo07:26
*** jbadiapa has joined #openstack-oslo07:37
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo07:44
*** shardy has joined #openstack-oslo07:57
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo08:32
*** hberaud is now known as hberaud|school-r09:51
openstackgerritchenker proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Fix Pep8 bandit error  https://review.opendev.org/65824910:00
*** hberaud|school-r is now known as hberaud|lunch10:06
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-oslo10:12
*** aojea has quit IRC10:20
*** raildo has joined #openstack-oslo10:23
*** aojea has joined #openstack-oslo10:37
*** hberaud|lunch is now known as hberaud10:52
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-oslo11:10
*** ansmith has quit IRC11:45
*** snapiri has quit IRC11:59
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-oslo12:38
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/oslo.log master: Fix bandit errors  https://review.opendev.org/65831912:42
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-oslo12:48
*** seba has joined #openstack-oslo12:51
*** pcaruana|afk| has joined #openstack-oslo12:55
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:57
*** larainema has quit IRC12:58
*** dmellado_ has joined #openstack-oslo12:59
*** vdrok has quit IRC12:59
*** vdrok has joined #openstack-oslo13:00
*** dmellado has quit IRC13:00
*** dmellado_ is now known as dmellado13:00
*** larainema has joined #openstack-oslo13:00
*** Luzi has quit IRC13:10
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/oslo.messaging master: Fix switch connection destination when a rabbitmq cluster node disappear  https://review.opendev.org/65690213:28
*** starborn has quit IRC13:29
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Fix Sphinx lower-constraints  https://review.opendev.org/65881813:41
*** snapiri has joined #openstack-oslo13:47
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-oslo13:55
*** flaper87 has quit IRC13:55
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-oslo13:56
*** gmann has joined #openstack-oslo14:07
*** gmann is now known as gmann_pto14:07
openstackgerritAdrian Chiris proposed openstack/oslo.db master: Blacklist bandit 1.6.0 in test-requirements  https://review.opendev.org/65882914:22
adriancit seems that bandit 1.6.0 package has a bug that ignores exclude paths, this causes unit tests to fail in oslo.db, i have proposed a patch ^, currently pep8 checks fail14:25
*** hberaud is now known as hberaud|school-r14:26
smcginnisadrianc: In case you didn't see this thread - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006116.html14:33
adriancsmcginnis, thanks! missed that thread :( (would have saved me some debug time...)14:35
*** sean-k-mooney has joined #openstack-oslo14:39
*** sean-k-mooney has quit IRC14:39
*** sean-k-mooney has joined #openstack-oslo14:40
*** hberaud|school-r is now known as hberaud14:40
*** snapiri has quit IRC14:44
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/oslo.messaging master: Fix switch connection destination when a rabbitmq cluster node disappear  https://review.opendev.org/65690214:51
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: pin bandit < 1.6.0  https://review.opendev.org/65867414:52
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: add policy_url option to direct all policy checks to an outside service  https://review.opendev.org/65867514:52
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: update sphinx dependency  https://review.opendev.org/65883914:52
*** pcaruana|afk| has quit IRC14:55
openstackgerritKen Giusti proposed openstack/oslo.messaging master: Pin bandit to version <1.6.0  https://review.opendev.org/65884014:55
moguimarbeekneemech: meeting?15:00
*** beekneemech is now known as bnemec15:00
bnemec#startmeeting oslo15:00
openstackMeeting started Mon May 13 15:00:56 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bnemec. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'15:01
bnemecmoguimar: Yes :-)15:01
bnemeccourtesy ping for amotoki, amrith, ansmith, bnemec, dims, dougwig, e0ne15:01
bnemeccourtesy ping for electrocucaracha, garyk, gcb, haypo, hberaud, jd__, johnsom15:01
bnemeccourtesy ping for jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz, lhx_, moguimar, njohnston, raildo15:01
bnemeccourtesy ping for redrobot, sileht, sreshetnyak, stephenfin, stevemar, therve, thinrichs15:01
bnemeccourtesy ping for toabctl, zhiyan, zxy, zzzeek15:01
hberaudo/15:01
kgiustio/15:01
johnsomo/15:01
moguimaro/15:01
bnemec#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting15:03
bnemecForgot the agenda link. It's been too long since we had this meeting. :-)15:03
bnemec#topic Red flags for/from liaisons15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:03
ansmitho/15:03
moguimarI don't think we have anything from the Barbican side15:03
hberaudlol15:03
jungleboyjo/15:04
bnemecI think the main thing is Bandit, but that's not really Oslo.15:04
bnemecI have that as a main topic later.15:04
jungleboyjNo flags from Cinder that I know of.  :-)15:04
johnsomNothing from Octavia15:04
* johnsom Notes the bandit issue was an easy fix for Octavia team. It's just a path parsing change15:05
bnemecOkay, sounds like we can move on then.15:05
bnemec#topic Releases15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Releases (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:06
bnemecReleases happened last week, so everything that merged up until then should be out there.15:06
bnemecIncluding stable branches.15:06
bnemecBusiness as usual for this week too.15:06
bnemecI will note that I added hberaud as a new Oslo release liaison since Doug is no longer active in Oslo.15:07
bnemecI need to let the release team know that as well.15:07
bnemec#action bnemec to contact release team about new Oslo liaison15:07
bnemecThat's it for releases.15:08
bnemec#topic Action items from last meeting15:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Action items from last meeting (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:08
bnemec"ansmith_ to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/638248"15:08
bnemecDone, thanks ansmith.15:08
bnemec"bnemec to send email about meeting cancellation."15:09
bnemecDone15:09
bnemecAnd if not, it's way too late. :-)15:09
bnemecThat was it for action items.15:09
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/oslo.messaging master: Fix switch connection destination when a rabbitmq cluster node disappear  https://review.opendev.org/65690215:09
bnemec#topic Courtesy pings15:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Courtesy pings (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:09
bnemecIf you're in the courtesy ping list, please note that we'll be moving away from courtesy pings in the near future.15:10
bnemecThis came out of the discussion in the PTL tips and tricks session in Denver.15:10
bnemec#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-ptl-tips-and-tricks15:10
bnemecBasically courtesy pings are considered bad IRC netiquette.15:10
bnemecThe preferred method is for anyone interested in a meeting to add a custom notification on "#startmeeting oslo".15:11
moguimarisn't that irc client dependent?15:11
bnemecI'll keep doing courtesy pings for another week or two to give people a chance to see the change.15:11
* jungleboyj missed this discussion15:11
bnemecmoguimar: Yes, but any decent IRC client should be able to do it.15:11
jungleboyjIs there a pointer to instructions on how to do that?15:12
bnemecI guess if that's a blocker for anyone, please raise it on the list.15:12
moguimarbut then if you change irc client you're back to step 015:12
moguimar=(15:12
bnemecjungleboyj: Not that I know of. I actually need to figure out how to do it myself.15:12
jungleboyjOk.15:12
bnemecI also need to figure out how to test it since it presumably won't highlight on my own messages.15:13
jungleboyj:-)15:14
bnemecI'll send an email to the list about this. We can maybe have a deeper discussion there where the folks who objected to courtesy pings can be involved.15:14
moguimargood15:14
bnemecWe might need some dev docs about adding custom highlights in various popular IRC clients.15:14
jungleboyjbnemec:  Sounds like a good plan.  I will do some investigation as well.15:14
jungleboyjbnemec:  Yeah, was just looking for info on IRC Cloud15:14
bnemec#action bnemec to send email to list about courtesy pings15:15
bnemecOkay, look for that later today.15:15
bnemec#topic Bandit breakage15:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Bandit breakage (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:16
bnemecSo we have a bunch of different patches proposed to deal with this.15:16
bnemecSome capping it, some tweaking the exclusion list.15:16
bnemecI'd prefer to find a single solution so we don't have slightly different configs all over Oslo.15:16
bnemec#link https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/pull/48915:17
johnsomOctavia just needed this:15:17
johnsom#link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658476/1/tox.ini15:17
*** yan0s has quit IRC15:17
bnemecApparently that works well if you have a fairly simple test tree.15:18
kgiustiI followed Doug's patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658674/15:19
bnemecI know they had issues in Keystone because the wildcard didn't handle nested test directories or something.15:19
bnemecI don't know how much of that we have in Oslo, but it could be an issue.15:19
hberaudhttps://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/issues/48815:19
bnemecIt also worth noting that Bandit intends to fix this behavior, so we need to make sure whatever we do will work with 1.6.1.15:20
kgiustiI'd prefer just to blacklist 1.6.0 tho15:20
bnemec*It's15:20
bnemeckgiusti: I'm inclined to agree.15:20
moguimarthen we can pick Doug's fix for now15:20
bnemecAlthough I wonder if we should do a != exclusion instead so we don't have to go through and uncap when the fix is released.15:21
moguimarblacklist just 1.6.0 for now might pop the error back again in the future15:21
hberaudmoguimar: +1 but we can wait for 1.6.115:21
moguimarI'd put < 1.6.0 and keep an eye on bandit15:22
bnemecOn that note, it would be nice if we could do some testing with the proposed fix in bandit.15:22
hberaudFYI we also have some issues related to sphinx requirements15:23
bnemecNot only would it ensure that our stuff works with the eventual fix, it might help get the fix merged in the first place.15:23
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/658812/15:23
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/650505/15:23
hberaudrelated to this bump ^^^^15:24
bnemechberaud: Okay, one dependency problem at a time. :-)15:25
bnemecI've added sphinx as another topic after this one.15:25
hberaudbnemec: ack15:25
bnemecWe need an action on the bandit stuff.15:25
bnemecMaybe two patches per repo: one to cap, one to uncap with an exclusion of 1.6.0?15:26
bnemecWe merge the cap and then recheck the uncap once bandit releases the fix.15:26
bnemecThat way if the fix doesn't work we aren't blocked on anything but the uncap patch.15:26
bnemecThe downside is if we forget to merge an uncap patch, but that's not the end of the world.15:27
bnemecThoughts?15:27
hberaud+115:27
kgiusti+115:27
moguimar+115:28
bnemecOkay, we'll go with that.15:28
stephenfinbnemec: Any reason not to just change paths?15:28
stephenfinAssuming they don't break that with 1.6.1, of course15:28
bnemecstephenfin: It's not clear to me what the behavior in 1.6.1 is going to be.15:28
bnemecThe current behavior was not intended and I don't want to rely on it.15:29
stephenfinAck, +1 from me too so15:29
bnemecAlso, apparently it doesn't work in more complex repos.15:29
bnemecOkay, thanks.15:29
bnemec#action push cap, uncap patches to projects blocked by bandit15:30
bnemecI guess this might bite us if they can't restore the old behavior entirely.15:30
bnemecBut I'm not going to borrow trouble. :-)15:30
bnemecI'll update the list about our plans since I know basically everyone is dealing with this.15:31
bnemecAlthough most teams don't have quite so many projects to manage.15:31
bnemec#action bnemec to send email about bandit plans15:31
bnemec#topic Sphinx requirements15:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Sphinx requirements (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:31
bnemechberaud: You're up.15:32
hberaudso I guess my patch is not the right solution to fix the issue https://review.opendev.org/65881215:33
hberaudi know that the error occur on many project since few days15:33
hberauds/project/projects/15:33
bnemecstephenfin: This may also be relevant to your interests.15:34
hberaudI guess the CI requirements check fail due to this one => https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650505/15:34
bnemechberaud: I think maybe you want python_version>='3.4' instead of listing them.15:34
bnemec"...does not match "python_version>='3.4'"15:35
hberaudI suppose15:35
stephenfinhberaud: Which repo is failing?15:35
stephenfinI've seen some failures on projects that aren't using constraints15:35
hberaudopenstack/murano15:35
hberaudand I other I guess too but not sure yet15:35
bnemecOh, wait. It's not complaining about lower-constraints, it's complaining about doc/requirements.txt.15:35
hberaudoh are you sure15:37
bnemechberaud: http://logs.openstack.org/12/658812/1/check/requirements-check/04a5cd8/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-05-13_13_38_31_40015615:37
bnemecThat's where the errors are coming from.15:37
hberaudhttp://logs.openstack.org/18/658818/1/check/requirements-check/c8b8958/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-05-13_13_45_49_00756515:38
bnemechberaud: Which patch is that? It's not https://review.opendev.org/65881215:39
hberaudrelated to => http://logs.openstack.org/18/658818/1/check/requirements-check/c8b8958/ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658818/15:40
bnemecOh, it's in the url.15:40
hberaudnp15:40
bnemecThat one is failing on test-requirements.txt.15:41
hberaudyep15:41
bnemecWe most likely need to fix https://github.com/openstack/oslo.service/blob/master/test-requirements.txt#L1415:41
hberaudyeah15:42
bnemecOkay, "Similarly sphinx 2.0.0 drop py27 support do express that in global-requirements."15:43
bnemecFrom https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/commit/00b2bcf7d664b1526b4eefe157c33113206d625115:44
*** pcaruana|afk| has joined #openstack-oslo15:44
bnemecSo we need tweak the requirements to cap sphinx on py27.15:44
hberaudok15:44
bnemecProbably we need to split it into two lines, one for python_version=='2.7' and one for >='3.4'.15:45
bnemecLet's take a look at that after the meeting.15:45
hberaudok15:45
bnemec#action bnemec and hberaud to sort out sphinx requirements15:45
hberaudack15:45
bnemec#topic PBR unit test flakiness15:46
*** openstack changes topic to "PBR unit test flakiness (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:46
bnemecIn other good news, it's almost impossible to merge anything in PBR because the unit tests are super flaky in the gate.15:46
hberaudoh15:46
bnemecIt seems to be related to the WSGI wrapper unit tests.15:46
bnemecI wanted to bring it up in the hopes that someone would be able to investigate.15:47
bnemecUnfortunately, IIRC these failures don't reproduce for me locally.15:47
bnemecAnd I never got any further than running the pbr unit tests in a loop last time I looked at this.15:47
hberaudI'll take a look on my side too15:48
bnemechberaud: Thanks15:48
bnemec#action hberaud to investigate pbr unit test flakiness15:48
bnemec#topic Weekly Wayward Review15:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Weekly Wayward Review (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:49
bnemec#link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/618569/15:50
bnemechberaud: Looks like you had been involved in this one too.15:50
hberaudyep15:51
bnemecI think your changes were just to the docstrings, so I'd be okay with you +2'ing it if it looks good now.15:51
hberaudok I'll double check15:51
bnemecIt's pbr so it may not actually merge, but at least we can get it approved.15:52
hberaudack15:52
bnemec#action hberaud to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/618569/15:52
bnemec#topic Open discussion15:52
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:52
bnemecOkay, that was it for topics.15:52
bnemecWe have a few minutes left if there's anything else.15:52
hberaudif someone can take a look to => https://review.opendev.org/645208 and https://review.opendev.org/64749215:53
hberaud(the second is pbr too)15:53
bnemecYeah, that would be next week's wayward review if it doesn't merge before then. :-)15:54
hberaudack15:54
bnemechberaud: Approved https://review.opendev.org/#/c/64520815:54
hberaudbnemec: thx15:55
bnemecNote that pike is EM now so it won't get released.15:55
hberaudbnemec: ack15:55
bnemecI also +2'd the ocata backport.15:57
hberaudnice15:57
bnemecAnything else? We have 3 minutes.15:57
moguimarnot on my end15:57
hberaudI'll ping kmalloc about https://review.opendev.org/634457 (switch from python-memcached to pymemcache), since I guess everything is ok15:58
bnemecSounds good.15:58
hberaudI just have an issue with the openstack/opendev => https://review.opendev.org/65834715:58
bnemecOkay, let's call the meeting and get started on all the action items I assigned.15:59
bnemec#endmeeting15:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Common Libraries | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo"15:59
openstackMeeting ended Mon May 13 15:59:09 2019 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2019/oslo.2019-05-13-15.00.html15:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2019/oslo.2019-05-13-15.00.txt15:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2019/oslo.2019-05-13-15.00.log.html15:59
kmallochberaud: i can look in a few.15:59
hberaudkmalloc: nice thanks15:59
bnemechberaud: What is the problem? It's passing ci and looks fine.15:59
kmallochberaud: need to run off to deal with a vet thing, our poor dog broke his tooth.15:59
bnemecOuch16:00
kmallocbnemec: there were some issues with how everything worked in comparison.16:00
kmallocso it needs review now that it is passing.16:00
hberaudrequirements check who fail due to the move from openstack to opendev16:00
kmallocand that^16:00
bnemeckmalloc: The other one hberaud linked. I'm mostly waiting on your signoff on pymemcache. :-)16:00
kmallocbut yeah, it's on my list16:00
kmalloci'll be back in... an hour? or maybe 2.16:00
kmallocthe pymemcache thing is top of my list for the day when i'm back16:01
bnemechberaud: What is failing? The one you linked isn't.16:01
hberaudthis one => https://review.opendev.org/658347 fix the issue for this one => https://review.opendev.org/63445716:02
*** aojea has quit IRC16:02
bnemecOh, so we just need to merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/65834716:05
hberaudyep exactly16:05
hberaudand to rebase too16:05
bnemecOh, wait. But that's using the new u-c location. If that's not working we need to talk to the releases team and figure it out.16:05
hberaudbnemec: not sure to follow you?16:06
bnemechberaud: https://releases.openstack.org/constraints/upper/master should work. That's the new location that the release team started publishing upper-constraints to.16:07
bnemecIf it doesn't work we need to let the releases team know so it can get fixed.16:07
hberaudbnemec: ah ok16:08
*** raildo has quit IRC16:11
bnemechberaud: Is the problem that pymemcache in upper-constraints isn't new enough?16:12
hberaudbnemec: not to my knowledge16:14
bnemechberaud: Okay, I'm looking at http://logs.openstack.org/57/634457/44/check/openstack-tox-py27/d4a74e4/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-05-10_07_47_34_283337 which doesn't look like an u-c problem.16:15
bnemecUnless pymemcache.client was added recently.16:15
hberaudyep http://logs.openstack.org/57/634457/44/check/openstack-tox-lower-constraints/7908550/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-05-10_07_39_23_30518916:18
hberaudI'll test locally16:18
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:20
bnemecGah, oslo.service is still using pbr for doc builds.16:21
bnemecSo many yaks to shave. :-/16:21
hberaudbnemec: I agree lol16:21
hberaudbnemec: I guess this bad rebase have broken my patch and I haven't restore it properly or something like that16:22
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/634457/43/16:22
*** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-oslo16:23
*** a-pugachev has quit IRC16:26
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/oslo.cache master: Switch from python-memcached to pymemcache.  https://review.opendev.org/63445716:27
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Update sphinx requirement to match g-r  https://review.opendev.org/65885716:32
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Stop using pbr to build docs  https://review.opendev.org/65885816:32
hberaudbnemec: pymemcache missing in test-requirements... I don't understand why suddenly it disappeared but now it's ok... I surely did mistake somewhere few weeks ago16:32
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:42
*** hberaud is now known as hberaud|gone16:55
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0  https://review.opendev.org/65886717:08
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65886817:08
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC17:17
*** lpetrut has quit IRC17:27
*** jroll has quit IRC17:34
*** jroll has joined #openstack-oslo17:35
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.service stable/pike: Fix oslo.service ProcessLauncher fails to call stop  https://review.opendev.org/64520817:36
kmallochberaud|gone, bnemec: the pymemcache change is looking fine, I want to test it locally and then see zuul's response. overally I'm pleased with the direction it's gone.17:41
kmalloci've +1'd so far.17:41
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65886717:43
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65886817:43
bnemeckmalloc: Sounds good, thanks.17:43
kmallocyup.17:43
hberaud|gonekmalloc: thanks17:46
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.cache master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65887517:56
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.cache master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65887617:56
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65887918:01
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65888018:01
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.context master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65888118:02
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.context master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65888218:02
bnemecOkay, that's the c's done. I'm going to stop there and wait for ci to verify that everything is kosher again.18:03
bnemecAlso, I'm hungry and need food. Which is probably why I just used "kosher". ;-)18:04
bnemecIf everyone who has patches open against other repos could rework them to follow that pattern^ it would save some time.18:05
*** raildo has joined #openstack-oslo18:12
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo18:17
openstackgerritKen Giusti proposed openstack/oslo.messaging master: Pin bandit to version <1.6.0  https://review.opendev.org/65884018:23
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo18:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:54
*** larainema has quit IRC19:25
*** gmann_pto has quit IRC19:33
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65890619:49
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65890719:49
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65890619:52
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65890719:52
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65887919:58
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65888019:58
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.db master: Cap Bandit below 1.6.0 and update Sphinx requirement  https://review.opendev.org/65891020:10
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.db master: Uncap Bandit  https://review.opendev.org/65891120:10
bnemecOkay, definitely need to exclude #openstack-oslo from my "oslo" notification.20:11
bnemecBut hey, my notification is working. :-)20:11
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo20:14
*** bobh has quit IRC20:19
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:26
*** kgiusti has quit IRC20:42
*** ansmith has quit IRC20:43
*** pcaruana|afk| has quit IRC20:46
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC21:09
*** raildo has quit IRC21:13
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo21:45
*** bobh has quit IRC22:03
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-oslo22:31
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: add policy_url option to direct all policy checks to an outside service  https://review.opendev.org/65867522:31
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo23:04
*** rcernin has quit IRC23:07
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo23:07
openstackgerritVipin Balachandran proposed openstack/oslo.vmware master: Set locale to english  https://review.opendev.org/65893423:13
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-oslo23:50

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!