Tuesday, 2018-11-20

*** tosky has quit IRC00:14
*** Liang__ has joined #openstack-oslo00:24
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC00:35
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-oslo00:37
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC00:40
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-oslo00:40
*** Liang__ is now known as LiangFang01:32
*** links has joined #openstack-oslo06:00
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-oslo06:42
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-oslo07:20
*** pcaruana has quit IRC07:34
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-oslo07:40
*** snapiri has joined #openstack-oslo07:45
*** shardy has joined #openstack-oslo07:55
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo08:52
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo08:54
*** bobh has quit IRC09:05
*** tosky has joined #openstack-oslo09:11
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo09:24
*** links has quit IRC09:26
*** cdent has joined #openstack-oslo09:31
*** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-oslo09:34
*** snapiri has quit IRC09:36
*** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-oslo09:39
*** snapiri has joined #openstack-oslo09:45
*** LiangFang has quit IRC10:29
openstackgerritJosephine Seifert proposed openstack/oslo-specs master: Adding library for encryption and decryption  https://review.openstack.org/61875411:58
*** raildo has joined #openstack-oslo12:04
*** Luzi has quit IRC12:07
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-oslo12:22
*** njohnston has quit IRC12:58
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-oslo12:59
*** moguimar has joined #openstack-oslo12:59
dhellmannhberaud : did you see the comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/618834/ ?13:14
hberauddhellmann: not yet13:14
dhellmannit looks like there are some patches needed in nova for that oslo.service backport to be usable. do you want to try to handle those, too?13:15
hberauddhellmann: yep13:15
hberauddhellmann: I think he it about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617989/13:17
hberauddhellmann: can you take a look13:17
hberauddhellmann: I've submit this patch the last week13:17
dhellmannhberaud : that patch is going to bring a new feature (the fixture) back to the stable branch of the library and we don't usually do that13:19
dhellmannis that the only thing we would need to be able to fix nova? or is that a prerequisite for other changes that have to be backported in nova?13:20
* dhellmann has to step out for an appointment13:22
hberauddhellmann: I'm not sure but these changes was already backported dowstream to fix the nova CI on the rocky branch so I suppose it's a core change to fix the upstream CI on rocky13:24
hberauddhellmann: I do not have enough perspective yet to have a satisfactory overview but I can take a look13:26
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-oslo13:44
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-oslo13:56
*** njohnston has quit IRC14:05
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-oslo14:06
*** pbourke has quit IRC14:06
*** pbourke has joined #openstack-oslo14:08
*** mmethot has quit IRC14:13
*** mmethot has joined #openstack-oslo14:17
*** Liang__ has joined #openstack-oslo14:19
*** Liang__ is now known as LiangFang14:19
openstackgerritJames Page proposed openstack/taskflow master: Move test requirements out of runtime requirements  https://review.openstack.org/61900714:26
openstackgerritDaniel Vincze proposed openstack/oslo.log master: Add config options for log rotation  https://review.openstack.org/61646414:34
*** efried has left #openstack-oslo14:36
sean-k-mooneydhellmann: hberaud o/14:52
hberaudsean-k-mooney: o/14:53
sean-k-mooneyi was just talking to efried on the nova channel and he suggested we backport https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:loopingcall-wait+(status:open+OR+status:merged) to fix the oslo.service issue on rocky14:53
sean-k-mooneyis the sleep fixture available14:53
sean-k-mooneyon stable rocky14:53
hberaudsean-k-mooney: we just need to backport these 3 patchs?14:54
sean-k-mooneye.g. is it in 1.31.614:54
sean-k-mooneywell https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616697/2 will remove the mock that are cause the failures14:54
sean-k-mooneyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/615724/6 uses the sleep fixture14:55
sean-k-mooneythat are the replacement14:55
hberaudbut we need to validate it https://review.openstack.org/61798914:55
sean-k-mooneyhberaud: the oslo.service change broke our donwstream ci also and are currently blocking changes to nova14:55
hberaudsean-k-mooney: before14:55
sean-k-mooneyyes before this was prosed  when you backported the cpu fix internall it broke our ci14:56
sean-k-mooneywe discoved this when our jenkins builds on nova started breaking last week14:56
hberaudsean-k-mooney: the last week I backport the fixture feature on rocky but he is not merged yet14:56
sean-k-mooneywe dont have the nova change downstream just the oslo service changes that case the nova unit test to break14:57
hberaudsean-k-mooney: ack14:58
sean-k-mooneyim going to backport https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616697/2 and make it depend on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/618834/ to test if that will allow ti to pass14:58
hberaudsean-k-mooney: doug went to +2 my patch14:58
sean-k-mooneyif so we can invert the order14:58
sean-k-mooneyhberaud: which one?14:58
sean-k-mooneydo you have a fix already?14:58
hberaudhttps://review.openstack.org/61798914:58
hberaudsean-k-mooney: no14:59
sean-k-mooneyoh that is a backport of the sleep fixture14:59
hberaudsean-k-mooney: yep14:59
sean-k-mooneyya so we need to backport 3 patchs14:59
sean-k-mooney1 nova stop mocking oslo.service internals15:00
sean-k-mooney2 sleep fixture for oslo.service15:00
sean-k-mooney3 nova use sleep fixture15:00
hberaudsean-k-mooney: yes15:00
sean-k-mooneycool do you want me to do 1 and 3 while we wait for 215:01
hberaudsean-k-mooney: no I think I can do this, let's me ping you if needed15:02
sean-k-mooneysure15:03
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-oslo15:14
*** Luzi has quit IRC15:14
*** hberaud is now known as hberaud|school15:33
*** zaneb has quit IRC15:34
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-oslo15:35
*** hberaud|school is now known as hberaud15:38
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:40
*** zaneb has quit IRC15:51
hberaudsean-k-mooney: well, I added you to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619022/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619019/15:52
sean-k-mooneythanks15:55
hberaudsean-k-mooney: you are welcome15:59
dhellmannsean-k-mooney , hberaud : given that we need to coordinate between 4 teams (oslo, nova, stable, requirements) I think we want a ML thread to lay out what needs to happen and why. It's going to result in fewer repetitions of questions (and answers) in the end16:03
hberauddhellmann: +116:03
dhellmannhberaud : I think you have all the info, right? so could you start the thread?16:04
hberauddhellmann: I can try16:04
dhellmannthanks, and we'll fill in any gaps :-)16:04
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-oslo16:12
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-oslo16:14
hberauddhellmann: which ML do you think we need to use? I guess use openstack-discuss (http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss). Or create a new mailing list dedicated to this kind of coordination, thoughts?16:15
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:21
dhellmannhberaud : yes, the openstack-discuss list16:41
hberauddhellmann: ack16:41
dhellmannwe're trying to reduce the number of separate mailing lists we have16:41
dhellmannyou could tag the message with [oslo][nova][stable][requirements] to get everyone's attention16:41
hberauddhellmann: I take a look about the openstack-discuss topics and yeah I also think that is the right choice16:42
hberauddhellmann: ack16:42
*** zaneb has quit IRC16:44
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-oslo16:49
*** a-pugachev_ has joined #openstack-oslo17:00
hberauddhellmann: do you agree that the main topic is the update of the constraint for the oslo.service and not the oslo.service.fixture usage in nova? I'll summarize all these changes due to the loopingcall etc... and so I'll speak about fixture17:00
*** a-pugachev has quit IRC17:04
*** a-pugachev_ is now known as a-pugachev17:04
dhellmannhberaud : part of the reason I asked for a ML post is that I'm not really sure what is driving this set of changes. It seems like we want the fix in the service library that is blocked because the constraint update is failing, and the other changes are all necessary to enable us to have that. But that's part of what I need explained: why is this an issue and what exactly do we need to do to be able to proceed17:06
dhellmannif some of that isn't clear, that's ok, we can work it out together17:06
hberaudack17:06
dhellmannfor example, we could work on the email draft together using an etherpad17:06
hberauddhellmann: yeah I think it's a good idea17:06
hberauddhellmann: I'm work on it and I ping you when I think that my draft is ok17:07
dhellmannsounds good17:07
dhellmannit's close to lunch time here, so I may be out for a bit. if that makes it late in your timezone I can provide feedback and we can look at it again early tomorrow17:08
hberauddhellmann: np17:09
hberauddhellmann: me too, I think that I'll release my draft tomorrow, it's close to the end of day and I need to manage my kids homeworks etc... :)17:12
dhellmannhberaud : that all sounds more important :-)17:12
*** a-pugachev has quit IRC17:17
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-oslo17:24
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo17:31
*** shardy has quit IRC17:36
*** lbragstad has quit IRC17:38
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo17:41
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:44
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo17:57
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-oslo18:04
*** zaneb has quit IRC18:06
*** zbitter is now known as zaneb18:18
*** pcaruana has quit IRC18:47
*** zul has quit IRC19:22
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:22
*** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-oslo19:32
*** a-pugachev has quit IRC19:39
*** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-oslo20:18
*** raildo has quit IRC20:48
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-oslo21:20
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo21:38
*** lpetrut has quit IRC21:41
*** mugsie has quit IRC23:06
*** cdent has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!