Monday, 2018-10-08

*** zaneb has joined #openstack-oslo00:18
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-oslo00:53
*** phuongnh has joined #openstack-oslo01:02
*** ansmith has quit IRC01:14
*** ducnv has joined #openstack-oslo01:20
*** tommylikehu has joined #openstack-oslo01:31
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC02:30
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Handle config mapping changes  https://review.openstack.org/52631403:33
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo03:35
*** bobh has quit IRC03:40
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Handle config mapping changes  https://review.openstack.org/52631403:56
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Handle config mapping changes  https://review.openstack.org/52631404:05
*** hoangcx has quit IRC04:27
*** pooja_jadhav has joined #openstack-oslo04:33
*** tommylikehu has quit IRC05:27
*** snapiri has quit IRC06:12
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo06:21
*** giblet is now known as gibi06:50
*** tosky has joined #openstack-oslo07:13
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo07:19
*** rcernin has quit IRC07:21
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: replace loop with dictionary lookup  https://review.openstack.org/60620907:25
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: replace 'upgrade_value' with 'convert_on_upgrade'  https://review.openstack.org/60620707:42
openstackgerrit98k proposed openstack/oslo-specs master: fix tox python3 overrides  https://review.openstack.org/60859707:46
*** mattgo has joined #openstack-oslo07:47
*** finucannot is now known as stephenfin08:15
*** snapiri has joined #openstack-oslo08:19
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: use difflib to report mismatches in migrator tests  https://review.openstack.org/60621008:26
stephenfinmordred: I had also been looking at https://github.com/takluyver/flit, which seems to be somewhat related to PEP517. Would personally rather wait til that PEP was formally approved first though08:33
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: fix formatting of sample defaults  https://review.openstack.org/60769008:33
*** shardy has joined #openstack-oslo08:39
*** moguimar has joined #openstack-oslo08:44
openstackgerritDuc Nguyen proposed openstack/oslo.config master: update 'sample_default' instead of 'default' when migrating  https://review.openstack.org/60621108:46
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-oslo08:49
*** sean-k-mooney has joined #openstack-oslo10:01
stephenfinOh, here we go again https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:update-gitignore10:03
openstackgerritStephen Finucane proposed openstack/taskflow stable/rocky: open stable/rocky, with fixes  https://review.openstack.org/58619110:09
openstackgerritStephen Finucane proposed openstack/taskflow stable/rocky: Update .gitreview for stable/rocky  https://review.openstack.org/58619110:10
openstackgerritStephen Finucane proposed openstack/taskflow stable/rocky: Update UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/rocky  https://review.openstack.org/58619210:11
openstackgerritStephen Finucane proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Unit tests to illustrate positional argument bug  https://review.openstack.org/45095610:21
openstackgerritStephen Finucane proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Refactor unit tests for CLI usage  https://review.openstack.org/45193310:21
openstackgerritStephen Finucane proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Assume positional arguments are required  https://review.openstack.org/45194710:21
openstackgerritStephen Finucane proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Support hyphens in positional argument names  https://review.openstack.org/45196710:21
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-oslo10:26
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo10:35
stephenfinbeekneemech: I've stuck you on a couple of backport changes. I'm not sure what the policy around Pike/Ocata is now10:43
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-oslo10:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslotest master: Fix nits in timeout change  https://review.openstack.org/60489210:58
sean-k-mooneywhat time does dghelman ususally join ? 2 ish? wanted to ask him a questiong re git-nit11:09
*** phuongnh has quit IRC11:09
*** rcernin has quit IRC11:17
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.i18n master: Always build universal wheels  https://review.openstack.org/60817411:29
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.config master: Simple config validator  https://review.openstack.org/56795011:33
*** rpittau has joined #openstack-oslo11:35
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.config master: Add support for machine-readable files to validator  https://review.openstack.org/59319411:40
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.config master: Add release note and documentation for config validator  https://review.openstack.org/60216911:40
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.context master: Always build universal wheels  https://review.openstack.org/60824611:59
*** raildo has joined #openstack-oslo12:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.config master: Always build universal wheels  https://review.openstack.org/60824312:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tooz master: Ensure consistent encoding of strings for ID  https://review.openstack.org/60163212:03
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:04
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.cache master: Always build universal wheels  https://review.openstack.org/60818312:10
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo12:13
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.utils master: Fix exception raise at rpdb session  https://review.openstack.org/60046512:32
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-oslo12:51
*** moguimar has quit IRC12:51
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo12:54
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-oslo12:57
*** e0ne has quit IRC13:05
stephenfinCan someone take a look at this today? Would be nice to get it in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594222/13:18
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:24
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo13:27
*** zaneb has quit IRC13:29
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-oslo13:29
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo13:32
*** jaosorior has quit IRC13:39
openstackgerritLance Bragstad proposed openstack/oslo.policy master: Add guidelines for naming policies  https://review.openstack.org/60621413:47
*** moguimar has joined #openstack-oslo13:49
*** ducnv_ has joined #openstack-oslo14:08
*** munimeha1 has joined #openstack-oslo14:08
*** SteelyDan is now known as dansmith14:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo14:17
*** beekneemech is now known as bnemec14:22
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-oslo14:32
*** gcb_ has joined #openstack-oslo14:53
*** e0ne has quit IRC14:54
*** lpetrut has quit IRC14:57
bnemec#startmeeting oslo15:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Oct  8 15:00:29 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bnemec. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'15:00
ajoo/15:00
bnemeccourtesy ping for amotoki, amrith, ansmith, bnemec, dansmith, dhellmann, dims15:00
bnemeccourtesy ping for dougwig, e0ne, electrocucaracha, flaper87, garyk, gcb, haypo15:00
bnemeccourtesy ping for jd__, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz, lhx_, moguimar15:00
bnemeccourtesy ping for njohnston, raildo, redrobot, sileht, sreshetnyak, stephenfin, stevemar15:00
bnemeccourtesy ping for therve, thinrichs, toabctl, zhiyan, zxy, zzzeek15:00
dhellmanno/15:00
redroboto/15:01
gcb_o/15:01
johnsomo/15:01
ansmitho/15:01
raildoo_15:01
moguimaro/15:01
stephenfino/15:01
kgiustio/15:01
jungleboyjo/15:01
bnemec#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting15:02
bnemec#topic Red flags for/from liaisons15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:02
bnemecMajor release of oslo.messaging last week.15:02
johnsomNothing to report from the Octavia team15:02
jungleboyjNothing from me.15:02
bnemecI don't think it should affect anyone, but it's something to keep in mind.15:03
bnemecOh, actually sileht found a significant bug in it.15:03
ducnv_o/15:03
bnemecLet me find the link.15:03
bnemechttps://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/commit/172cfb33f3ee207531a9e82fbc8293d24009a25615:04
bnemecIt will only affect you if you aren't explicitly setting a transport, which I suspect is usually not the case.15:04
bnemecBut obviously it is sometimes.15:04
johnsomThanks for the heads up. We are calling out the transport, but it's always nice to have this information should things go sideways.15:05
bnemecIt's fixed and should get released as part of the usual bunch of releases this week too.15:06
bnemecOtherwise I think that's it.15:06
bnemec#topic Releases15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Releases (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:06
bnemecBusiness as usual.15:07
bnemec#topic Action items from last meeting15:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Action items from last meeting (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:07
bnemec"bnemec to request project update slot"15:08
bnemecDone, but...15:08
bnemecBecause of the uncertainty around my travel plans I waited too long.15:08
bnemecSo unless some projects drop out we aren't going to have a normal project update slot. :-(15:09
dhellmannah, bummer15:09
bnemecI was thinking we should look into whether we could do a lightning talk or something.15:09
jungleboyjbnemec:  Bummer.15:10
bnemecIt might not be as formal, but at least we could get the information out there.15:10
dhellmannwe should try to get moguimar a lightning talk slot15:10
dhellmannat the very least, that's a big new feature for folks to know is coming15:10
bnemecYeah, agreed.15:10
* dhellmann looks around the room for someone else he can volunteer to do something15:10
moguimaro/15:11
moguimarI can do lightning talk on drivers15:11
bnemecI've never done a lighting talk, so I'm not sure when that all gets scheduled.15:11
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo15:11
bnemecIt's usually closer to summit though, right?15:11
* bnemec doesn't want to drop the ball again15:11
dhellmannyou should get in touch with ttx and/or diablo_rojo about it now to make sure15:11
bnemecOkay, will do.15:12
bnemecI can verify that we didn't get an official update timeslot too.15:12
bnemec#action bnemec to look into lightning talk for oslo.config drivers15:13
gcb_ttx or diablo_rojo  is the right people15:13
dhellmannthey will at least know who you really need to talk to15:13
bnemecSo, lesson learned. Request the timeslot early and we can always back out if nobody can do it.15:14
bnemec"bnemec to start etherpad for project update topics"15:14
bnemecObsoleted by the previous topic.15:14
bnemecBut will do if we still get a session.15:15
bnemec"bnemec to send dhellmann slides from previous project update"15:15
bnemecDitto.15:15
bnemecExcept that I can do the slides now since it turns out I am going to be in Berlin.15:15
bnemec"investigate writing a script to automatically tag stories with migrated priority"15:15
bnemecStill not done to my knowledge.15:16
dhellmannI started something on that15:16
dhellmannit's pretty hacky and I hit a bug in the SB API that I wasn't able to figure out15:16
dhellmannI forgot about putting it in a repo somewhere15:16
dhellmannI can put it in oslo.tools maybe?15:16
bnemecOkay, cool (the started part, not the bug part).15:16
dhellmannthat's not a good long term home, but it would let someone else take over the script15:17
bnemecThat seems like a reasonable place for it.15:17
bnemec#action dhellmann to put story tagging code in a repo (oslo.tools?)15:18
bnemecThat was it for action items.15:19
bnemecI think that covers the storyboard topic I still had on the agenda too.15:19
bnemec#topic os-log-merger15:19
*** openstack changes topic to "os-log-merger (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:19
bnemec#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60714215:20
ajohi o/15:20
ajoexactly, and15:20
bnemecThere was a proposal to add this as a formal project.15:20
ajo#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OsLogMerger15:20
bnemecA question that came up was whether it should be under the oslo umbrella.15:20
ajobnemec: Exactly, although it's not a library itself, and I didn't know if it'd have a place under oslo15:21
ajoit's a tool to help openstack developers and operators15:21
ajoI started it around 3 years ago and I haven't publicized it much.15:22
dhellmannwhat does it do?15:22
bnemecWe certainly have common logging bits in Oslo, but I'm trying to think whether we have much in the way of standalone tools like this.15:22
ajoSo, the purpose of the tool is to take the logs of several openstack (and non openstack services)15:22
ajoand merge them together in a single output, ordered by timestamp15:23
bnemec"os-log-merger is an OpenStack project which produces tools to help debugging openstack logs by aggregation. "15:23
bnemecquoth the wiki :-)15:23
ajohehe15:23
ajoit auto-detects the type of log15:23
ajoNeutron jobs use it to aggregate functional log outputs, and send the aggregation to logstash/kibana15:24
ajobut,15:24
ajoWhen you have lots of services (sometimes replicated across nodes) which interact to each other, it becomes a pain to trace a request, or whats happening under the hood (post-mortem)15:24
ajoosprofiler for example, helps with that if you prepare your environment, setup the services for a profiling session, etc15:25
ajobut if you just have the logs, it's not possible15:25
ajohttps://pypi.org/project/os-log-merger/  < -- search for "Level 3"15:25
ajothere is no anchor, sorry :)15:26
ajoMy purpose with submiting it to governance (or oslo) is maximizing utility, making other projects more aware of it's existance, and eventually getting more contributions to make it better.15:27
ajoany questions?15:27
ajoSo the question remains, does it make sense to you folks?15:28
bnemec"It should work as long as the logs are based on oslo logger output."15:28
bnemec^seems like an argument to have this in oslo.15:28
ajobnemec: what do you mean "the logs are based on oslo logger output"?15:29
bnemecajo: I'm quoting from the pypi description. :-)15:29
ajobnemec: oh, that comment is obsolete, now it supports other formats too (so we're able to merge more system logs together with oslo logger output) :)15:29
ajooslo log :)15:30
bnemecAh, okay.15:30
* ajo sends a review to fix that :)15:30
dhellmannhow many people are contributing to it?15:30
ajodhellmann: not a lot, I believe we have been around 4-5 maximum, I can ask git for more precise number15:31
bnemecThere are three listed on the wiki right now.15:31
dhellmannhow many are *active*?15:31
dhellmannI don't know about adopting something that isn't maintained15:31
dhellmannwe have a lot of those sorts of things already15:31
ajo3-415:32
ajodhellmann: I understand the concern, of course :)15:32
ajoit's been slow during 3 years, there's room for lots of improvement. And greater visibility should help with having more capacity to develop it15:33
dhellmannbnemec : that tagging script is in https://review.openstack.org/60870715:34
bnemecdhellmann: Thanks15:34
dhellmannI'm also a bit concerned that this is stretching our mission statement, which has to do with common libraries15:34
gcb_we have  check list for adopting an oslo project or not, let me find the URL15:35
dhellmannI feel like folks suggested bringing it to Oslo because it didn't fit anywhere else :-/15:35
dhellmannI think it's probably a useful tool, I just feel like it might be better served in an ops tools SIG or project team15:35
ajoyeah, true, and because creating a whole governance project just for this, seemed an overkill I guess15:35
dhellmannpossibly, yeah15:35
gcb_http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/policy/new-libraries.html15:36
bnemecAre there other ops tools that we could put under the same governance umbrella as this?15:36
*** moguimar has quit IRC15:36
ajodhellmann: what do you mean "ops tools SIG or project team", creating a new project with such purpose?15:36
dhellmannajo : yes15:36
dhellmannbnemec : who owns os-purge?15:36
ajook, that could make a lot of sense, I suspect there are other tools in existence which could be willing to join15:37
bnemecI have no idea, but that would be a good one too.15:37
dhellmanngcb_ : I think the fact that that document only talks about libraries is pretty significant15:37
bnemecAnd it would be nice to make that an official thing since I know a lot of operators want it.15:37
ajoyeah15:37
dhellmannbnemec : yeah, the public cloud group expressed some interest in os-purge-like features recently15:38
*** moguimar has joined #openstack-oslo15:39
ajoI'm fine with going the ops tools team path.... that makes sense considering the purpose of the oslo project15:39
ajoif we o the ops-tools patch, any advice dhellmann?15:39
gcb_dhellmann,  yeah,   do you mean https://pypi.org/project/ospurge/ /15:39
ajomay be we can talk about that off-meeting15:39
ajodon't want to hold everybody15:39
dhellmanngcb_ : yes15:39
bnemecYeah, that feels like a better fit than Oslo for this.15:39
*** e0ne has quit IRC15:40
dhellmannajo : maybe a good next step is to propose creating a group like that on the  mailing list(s)?15:40
dhellmannthe structure could be a lot like oslo, with separate review teams on each repo and 1 core team across them all if folks are more comfortable with that15:40
dhellmannand a sig feels like it's lower effort than a project team15:40
ajodhellmann: how does a SIG work?15:40
dhellmannhttps://governance.openstack.org/sigs/15:41
ajothanks15:41
dhellmannthe process to create one is at the very bottom there15:41
ajodhellmann: I may have some more questions, if you have time off meeting, no need to hold everybody15:41
ajothanks a lot15:41
dhellmannand I can help you find a guide to set it up if you get some positive responses15:41
dhellmannajo : sure15:42
dhellmannwe could move to #openstack-tc after this meeting15:42
ajoack15:42
bnemecOkay, good discussion. Thanks everyone.15:42
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo15:42
bnemecThat was it for topics.15:43
bnemec#topic Weekly Wayward Review15:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Weekly Wayward Review (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:43
bnemecThere's the config migrator one, but I think that one's already being actively worked.15:44
bnemecSo, let's do this one:15:44
bnemec#link https://review.openstack.org/58352415:44
bnemecI suspect that one lingered because of the discussion over how the message was formatted.15:45
bnemecI guess Doug +2'd the first patch set, so maybe this already has consensus.15:46
* bnemec looks what changed from 1 to 2.15:46
dhellmannwas it just rebased?15:46
bnemecAh, nothing.15:46
bnemecYeah, must have been.15:47
bnemecOkay, sent it.15:48
dhellmannyeah, we can clean that up15:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC15:49
bnemecThere's also a fairly simple followup to that one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583525/315:49
bnemecThe only negative comment so far was in regard to the commit message.15:49
bnemecAnd that was addressed, I believe.15:50
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.config master: avoid trailing space in sphinxext log output  https://review.openstack.org/60871715:50
dhellmannfixed ^^15:50
bnemec+215:50
bnemecThanks15:50
stephenfinI have a few15:51
stephenfinassuming wayward means "good but needs review"15:51
dhellmannlingering, yeah15:52
bnemecIt's mostly grabbing our oldest review without a -1 and figuring out how to proceed.15:52
stephenfinThese two would be good https://review.openstack.org/583957 https://review.openstack.org/59422215:52
bnemecWe just knocked out two of yours. :-)15:52
stephenfinOh, awesome15:52
* stephenfin loves it when things happen without him having to do a thing :)15:53
stephenfinOf those two I shared, the latter one's the one I care about. The other one? Meh, nice-to-have at most15:53
bnemecAh, yes. I was looking at that one before the meeting.15:54
dhellmannlgtm15:54
stephenfin(y) Ta15:55
bnemecOkay, three down. Very good. :-)15:56
bnemec#topic Open discussion15:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)"15:56
stephenfinI have an item for this: backports15:57
stephenfinI mentioned it here earlier today, but we've a couple of open patches against Ocata and Pike and I'm not sure what the policy around accepting them is15:57
stephenfin...especially with extended-maintenance now a thing (for Ocata)15:58
stephenfin(If there are docs on this somewhere, please tell me where to go RTFM :))15:58
dhellmannthose branches are still open for stable backports, aren't they?15:59
bnemecstephenfin: I think any bug fixes that would have been appropriate during the maintained phase are still appropriate in EM.15:59
bnemecWe just don't produce releases anymore.15:59
bnemechttps://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#maintenance-phases15:59
dhellmannI guess ocata is EM but the others are stable: https://releases.openstack.org15:59
stephenfinOK, so that brings me to the second part of my question: what's considered appropriate in that case?15:59
bnemechttps://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#appropriate-fixes16:00
dhellmannhttps://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#extended-maintenance16:00
stephenfinnova's policy is the last release gets all bug backports, the second last release only gets security/data loss potential backports, and the third last release got nothing16:00
dhellmannheh16:00
dhellmannoh, we don't get that picky16:00
dhellmannsend it all back as far as people want to deal with fixing broken gate jobs16:00
bnemec+116:01
stephenfinOK, I wasn't sure about that point. I owe kgiusti/dmueller an apology, in that case16:01
stephenfinThanks for the info16:01
kgiustistephenfin: np16:02
bnemecOkay, we're two minutes over time.16:02
* kgiusti can't recall what exactly needs an apology, but likes stephenfin enough to forgive practically anything 16:02
bnemecFeel free to continue discussions in the regular channel.16:03
bnemecThanks for joining everyone!16:03
dhellmanno/16:03
bnemec#endmeeting16:03
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Common Libraries | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo"16:03
openstackMeeting ended Mon Oct  8 16:03:12 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:03
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2018/oslo.2018-10-08-15.00.html16:03
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2018/oslo.2018-10-08-15.00.txt16:03
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2018/oslo.2018-10-08-15.00.log.html16:03
*** gcb_ has quit IRC16:03
stephenfinkgiusti: :)16:04
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-oslo16:18
mriedembnemec: have you seen doug16:18
mriedemdoug's question on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604421/ ?16:19
mriedemwould be nice to flush the upgrade checker library changes this week so we can do a release - it sounds like a few projects are waiting on it16:19
bnemecmriedem: Yeah, the followups address his question.16:19
bnemecI guess we need to decide whether to squash them or just merge them all separately.16:20
bnemecAssuming everyone is onboard with the changes, of course.16:20
mriedemdhellmann: ^ ?16:20
mriedemi guess we should probably squash the bottom two?16:20
mriedemalthough doug's change is kind of a larger refactor16:21
*** moguimar has quit IRC16:34
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: tighten API for main()  https://review.openstack.org/60701116:57
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: enable debug output for tests  https://review.openstack.org/60701816:57
dhellmannmriedem , bnemec, stephenfin : there are the updates from the comments16:58
dhellmannin cases like this we usually just approve the chain from the top down so they all merge together16:58
dhellmannand don't release until they're all in16:58
dhellmann it looks like we're going to need to rebase some others16:59
bnemecdhellmann: Thanks.16:59
bnemecI'm good with just lining up the whole series and merging it at once.16:59
dhellmannI'll line them all up16:59
dhellmann(rebasing)16:59
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: Add database access details to UpgradeCommands docstring  https://review.openstack.org/60442217:00
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: Add reno support  https://review.openstack.org/60445217:00
dhellmannthere we go17:01
*** mattgo has quit IRC17:04
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-oslo17:15
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo17:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.config master: sphinxext: Print output to logs, not to file  https://review.openstack.org/58352417:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.config master: sphinxext: Handle multi-line group descriptions  https://review.openstack.org/58352517:26
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:29
*** shardy has quit IRC17:40
mriedemdhellmann: bnemec: i'm +2 on the stack17:43
dhellmannbnemec : if you approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607011/ I will approve the one at the base of the stack17:44
dhellmannmriedem : thanks17:44
bnemecack17:44
*** ducnv_ has quit IRC17:50
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: Update __main__.py for new API  https://review.openstack.org/60873417:52
bnemec^There's quite a bit of duplication between the example code and the docs.17:52
bnemecI'm wondering if the docs should just refer to the sample code, or maybe just have the sample code live exclusively in the docs.17:53
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo17:54
mriedemheh i guess we don't have a test for the example...17:57
mriedemif we dedup, i think i'd rather see the former17:58
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.policy master: sphinxext: Start parsing 'DocumentedRuleDefault.description' as rST  https://review.openstack.org/59422218:00
dhellmannbnemec : it looks like we have merge conflicts with the config migration tool series, too18:01
bnemec:-/18:05
bnemecAh, that was the validator. Which merged. \o/18:07
bnemecI'll take a look at rebasing it after lunch. I'm starving.18:07
*** sambetts|afk has quit IRC19:07
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-oslo19:10
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:19
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-oslo20:20
openstackgerritMerged openstack/taskflow stable/rocky: Update .gitreview for stable/rocky  https://review.openstack.org/58619120:32
openstackgerritMerged openstack/taskflow stable/rocky: Update UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/rocky  https://review.openstack.org/58619220:32
openstackgerritAndy Smith proposed openstack/oslo.messaging master: Switch driver to confluent-kafka client library  https://review.openstack.org/60319020:35
*** lbragstad has quit IRC20:37
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Handle config mapping changes  https://review.openstack.org/52631420:37
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: replace loop with dictionary lookup  https://review.openstack.org/60620920:37
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: replace 'upgrade_value' with 'convert_on_upgrade'  https://review.openstack.org/60620720:37
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: use difflib to report mismatches in migrator tests  https://review.openstack.org/60621020:37
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: update 'sample_default' instead of 'default' when migrating  https://review.openstack.org/60621120:37
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: update valid value in choice list for the opt  https://review.openstack.org/60306020:37
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo20:37
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-oslo20:38
*** ansmith has quit IRC20:47
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:48
*** pcaruana has quit IRC20:49
*** raildo has quit IRC20:57
*** bobh has quit IRC21:01
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo21:33
*** bobh has quit IRC21:42
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo21:47
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-oslo22:05
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: Move example implementation to docs  https://review.openstack.org/60873422:14
*** bobh has quit IRC22:19
mriedemwhy are we running tempest on oslo.upgradecheck? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607018/322:20
mriedemhttp://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/openstack-zuul-jobs/tree/zuul.d/zuul-legacy-project-templates.yaml#n7722:21
mriedemso i'm going to remove that...22:21
openstackgerritMatt Riedemann proposed openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: Don't run tempest jobs on changes  https://review.openstack.org/60878422:24
mriedemyar ^22:24
mriedemlet's save a few hours and nodes22:24
bnemecmriedem: copy-pasta. I brought the zuul config over from one of our other projects.22:24
*** bobh has joined #openstack-oslo22:24
*** bobh has quit IRC22:29
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Handle config mapping changes  https://review.openstack.org/52631422:31
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: replace loop with dictionary lookup  https://review.openstack.org/60620922:31
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: replace 'upgrade_value' with 'convert_on_upgrade'  https://review.openstack.org/60620722:31
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: use difflib to report mismatches in migrator tests  https://review.openstack.org/60621022:31
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: update 'sample_default' instead of 'default' when migrating  https://review.openstack.org/60621122:31
bnemecHrm, what happened to the last patch in that series?22:32
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-oslo22:35
bnemecGrr, I messed up the rebase and mistakenly squashed a couple of patches.22:39
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: update 'sample_default' instead of 'default' when migrating  https://review.openstack.org/60621122:41
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed openstack/oslo.config master: update valid value in choice list for the opt  https://review.openstack.org/60306022:41
bnemecThat should be right.22:41
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC22:49
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-oslo22:50
*** munimeha1 has quit IRC22:50
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo22:50
*** mriedem has left #openstack-oslo22:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/oslo.upgradecheck master: Don't run tempest jobs on changes  https://review.openstack.org/60878422:58
*** tosky has quit IRC23:03
*** pbourke has quit IRC23:08
*** pbourke has joined #openstack-oslo23:08
*** lbragstad has quit IRC23:16

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!