Tuesday, 2014-06-10

*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan00:10
*** zzzeek has quit IRC00:18
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/taskflow: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9325400:40
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:52
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo01:10
*** arnaud has quit IRC01:31
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-oslo01:37
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo02:33
*** praneshp has quit IRC03:03
*** lbragstad has quit IRC03:11
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_03:20
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan03:26
*** gcb has joined #openstack-oslo03:41
*** arnaud has quit IRC03:42
*** dims_ has quit IRC03:53
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: Add basic support for conditional execution  https://review.openstack.org/9894603:55
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo04:38
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo04:46
*** dims_ has quit IRC04:50
*** ildikov has quit IRC04:51
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away04:59
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo05:02
*** lbragstad has quit IRC05:13
*** gcb has quit IRC05:14
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-oslo05:15
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo05:15
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo05:47
*** dims_ has quit IRC05:51
*** arnaud has quit IRC06:08
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo06:17
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo06:17
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-oslo06:19
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-oslo06:21
*** dims_ has quit IRC06:22
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-oslo06:22
*** arnaud has quit IRC06:22
*** arnaud__ has quit IRC06:22
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo06:23
*** arnaud has quit IRC06:23
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-oslo06:41
openstackgerritShuangtai Tian proposed a change to openstack/stevedore: use six.add_metaclass  https://review.openstack.org/9896306:41
*** lbragstad has quit IRC06:49
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo06:50
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8707:06
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo07:17
*** dims_ has quit IRC07:22
*** bogdando has quit IRC07:23
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-oslo07:24
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-oslo07:24
openstackgerritFlavio Percoco proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: Add graduate-oslo-text spec to juno  https://review.openstack.org/9896507:27
rpodolyakamorning07:28
openstackgerritFlavio Percoco proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: Add graduate-oslo-text spec to juno  https://review.openstack.org/9896507:28
openstackgerritMarc Koderer proposed a change to openstack/oslotest: Add known issue about time.time mocking  https://review.openstack.org/9541107:39
viktorshello folks! Does anybody know, how gates feel?07:49
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-oslo07:50
*** stannie has joined #openstack-oslo07:55
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-oslo07:59
*** gcb has joined #openstack-oslo08:08
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo08:18
*** dims_ has quit IRC08:22
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC08:31
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-oslo08:33
*** lbragstad has quit IRC08:43
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo08:43
jaosoriorhaypo, are you around?08:43
haypojaosorior: hi08:45
haypojaosorior: i added some comments to your last patch08:45
openstackgerritJuan Antonio Osorio Robles proposed a change to openstack/oslo.i18n: Trivial refactors for gettextutils  https://review.openstack.org/9842908:45
jaosoriorhaypo: some things you commented from my last patch are addressed by the following commit by bknudson https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98542/1/oslo/i18n/gettextutils.py08:46
jaosoriorhaypo: I asked him to rebase the changes, though I'm not sure if I should just add the changes in the patch, or should I wait for him to rebase08:47
haypojaosorior: oh, i didn't see his change08:56
haypojaosorior: i voted +2 for this change. it's safe, i don't see the need to rebase, other patches are not merged yet08:59
jaosoriorAlrighty then09:01
haypojaosorior: IMO adding dependencies makes patches more difficult to modify and review09:02
haypoi prefer small independent patches, but others may disagree :)09:02
jaosoriorTo be honest I do too, but I was asked to add the dependency so I thought it's the way it worked for graduating from incubation... Or something09:03
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC09:10
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_09:18
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo09:19
*** dims_ has quit IRC09:25
*** nacim has joined #openstack-oslo09:35
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-oslo09:53
*** gcb has quit IRC10:04
*** gcb has joined #openstack-oslo10:16
tkelseyhello oslo people, i have a question about oslo.messaging, hopefully this is the reight place to ask it. When using cast messages is there any mechanism to communicate an error back to the sender10:21
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo10:21
tkelseycall is blocking and will rasie exceptions ect, but cast seems to be fire and forget, is there a standard pattern for communicating failure when using cast ?10:22
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/taskflow: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9325410:23
ihrachyshkatkelsey: yes, it's the right place for the question. I think there is no such option avail, but I may be wrong.10:26
tkelseyihrachyshka: thanks, im thinking the same but wanted to ask the experts :-)10:26
*** dims_ has quit IRC10:27
ihrachyshkathere was a multicall concept before, it could call multiple methods and return results when ready, but I think it's removed now in oslo.messaging10:27
ihrachyshkaas per https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/Messaging, 'Finally, note that we previously had a concept of multicall where the method is invoked synchronously and multiple results are returned to the caller, each result returned as soon as it's ready. However, given that we don't have any current use cases for this, we're dropping support for it.10:27
ihrachyshka'10:27
tkelseyihrachyshka: i see, thanks for the info. Im not so much interested in multiple returned values as in knowing that a messaged is considered to have "failed". That is, was in some way rejected by the server.10:29
ihrachyshkatkelsey: I think before oslo.messaging, you could utilise multicall doing single call to do what you want, though I'm not sure10:31
ihrachyshkaall in all, if there is a valid case for that, you may be interested in pushing a patch for that10:31
ihrachyshkathat doesn't sound crazy on first sight10:31
tkelseyihrachyshka: I can see how that could work, im not entirely sure multicall would be the right tool though, since it seems to be solving a slightly different problem really.10:32
tkelseyit sound like a call type for use in a generator or  similar10:33
tkelseyof course I could be completely wrong :-)10:34
ihrachyshkatkelsey: well, anyway, it's gone now, so it's just history :)10:38
ihrachyshkaI'm not best in archaeology ;)10:38
tkelseyihrachyshka: heh well im still learning the lay of the land, bound to find a fossil sooner or later :-)10:39
tkelseyhumm, it almost seems like some sort of out of bounds communication could do this, somthing to say "hey that message failed" but it feels like it might be adverse to the intended use of cast.10:41
ihrachyshkayes, instead, for your use case, we would need some async call10:43
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC10:43
ihrachyshkabtw you can always hadk your way by creating two exchanges, then casting on the 1st peer exchange and retrieving results on another one10:44
ekarlsoihrachyshka: is the stuff ^ you are talking about a way to do for example a sync call to n servers ?10:44
ihrachyshkas/hadk/hack10:44
ihrachyshkaekarlso: tkelsey's case is 'doing call to one server, bailing out right away doing other work, then getting result in some other green thread once it's avail'10:45
ihrachyshka(at least that's my understanding)10:45
ekarlsoah ok10:46
ekarlsols10:46
ihrachyshkaekarlso: what's the problem with doing N sync calls with e.g. for loop? :)10:46
tkelseyihrachyshka: not quite, sorry for the miscommunication, to give some background, I am looking at message level security. This is very preliminary but im just thinking about the case where a message is delivered perfectly fine by the transport layer in a "cast" style but the sec layer says its bad.10:47
tkelseyim thinking about how this failure could be communicated back to the sender10:48
ekarlsoihrachyshka: ya10:48
ekarlsothat's what we're doing in designate atm, just wondered if this was the topic ;)10:48
ihrachyshkatkelsey: via another 'error' exchange?10:49
ihrachyshkatkelsey: but why not just using .call? This would make your flow easy to trace and react on errors10:50
tkelseyihrachyshka: yes call would work nicely, but cast is problematic10:50
*** ekarlso has quit IRC10:57
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-oslo10:58
tkelseyihrachyshka: my end goal is to create some sort of mechanism in oslo.messaging to support plugable sec policies for interacting with systems like Kite. More info on Kite is here https://blog-nkinder.rhcloud.com/?p=6211:00
bogdandohi. Regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95479/. Could you guys please contact the Nachi Ueno to remove -2, if appropriate?11:01
tkelseyihrachyshka: of course others may already be thinking about the same problem, but i figgured someone in here would probably know about that if so :-)11:01
*** bogdando has quit IRC11:04
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-oslo11:04
ihrachyshkabogdando: hm, have you pushed it to oslo-incubator first?11:08
ihrachyshkabogdando: also I think full sync is the preferred way to copy the code now11:08
ihrachyshkatkelsey: thanks, sounds interesting, I've added the link to my reading list :)11:09
bogdandoit is already in oslo-incubator, the patch is just a cherry-pick for critical issue fixing11:09
ihrachyshkabogdando: I can't find it with the same Change-Id. Please provide a link11:09
tkelseyihrachyshka: :-)11:10
bogdandoihrachyshka, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76686/ is it an appropriate place?11:10
ihrachyshkabogdando: the fix is in oslo.messaging. have you synced the fix to oslo-incubator? these are two different code bases.11:10
bogdandoihrachyshka, oh11:11
ihrachyshkathe path is: oslo.messaging -> oslo-incubator -> neutron11:11
ihrachyshkabogdando: yes, weird, I know, so no worries that you didn't get it right ;)11:11
ihrachyshkabogdando: btw neutron is near getting rid of oslo-incubator RPC layer and moving to oslo.messaging (patches have already started to merge), so maybe in a week or two the change will be unneeded. Anyway, if that's critical, we may push it now. But first incubator.11:12
bogdandoihrachyshka, I'm sorry but I cannot find impl_rabbit.py in stable/icehouse of Oslo-incubator, nor in master11:16
bogdandoihrachyshka, should I cherry pick it to impl_kombu.py instead?11:17
ihrachyshkait was renamed from impl_kombu.py11:17
ihrachyshkayes, though I wouldn't name it cherry-pick because cherry-pick obviously fails...11:17
ihrachyshkaI call it 'charry-pick' as in 'picking needed characters' :D11:17
bogdandoihrachyshka, that's how I call it... not an exact cherry-pick of cause...11:18
bogdandoihrachyshka, :D indeed11:18
ihrachyshkabogdando: fyi some background about incubation: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Incubation11:19
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo11:23
bogdandook, here is an Icehouse targeted one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99007/ ...11:26
ihrachyshkabogdando: wait, you may cherry-pick to stable only once master is fixed11:28
openstackgerritBogdan Dobrelya proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Sync kombu_reconnect_delay from Oslo  https://review.openstack.org/9900911:29
ihrachyshkaotherwise we may introduce regressions11:29
bogdandoihrachyshka, sure, I will submit for master as well11:29
ihrachyshkabogdando: and all the fixes should have the same change-id as oslo.messaging one11:30
bogdandohere it is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99009/. All are viewable by the change ID also11:30
bogdandoihrachyshka, btw, does the Oslo incubation sync assume the Oslo-incubator -> Project path only?11:31
bogdandoso, the Oslo.x -> Oslo-incubator part is up to contributor efforts?11:31
ihrachyshkayes. but to get anything in those projects, you should copy the fix from oslo.messaging to oslo-incubator11:32
ihrachyshkayes, you obviously may avoid doing the sync if you're not interested in it11:32
bogdandoihrachyshka, got it , thanks. So, please review guys...11:32
*** yamahata has quit IRC11:32
ihrachyshkabogdando: see comments11:37
openstackgerritBogdan Dobrelya proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Slow down Kombu reconnect attempts  https://review.openstack.org/9901711:45
*** gcb has quit IRC11:47
openstackgerritBogdan Dobrelya proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Slow down Kombu reconnect attempts  https://review.openstack.org/9901712:00
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: graduate-oslo-local  https://review.openstack.org/9902812:17
haypojaosorior: last comment? :-p https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98429/512:25
*** dhellmann has quit IRC12:28
*** bknudson has quit IRC12:34
jaosoriorIt could work. But I'll do it tomorrow. I'll be off my computer for the whole day now12:36
jaosoriorThanks for the input :)12:36
haypojaosorior: except of my last comment, the change now looks good to me12:36
haypojaosorior: so see you tomorrow ;)12:37
jaosoriorWha?12:37
haypojaosorior: you didn't understand what i wrote?12:38
jaosoriorNot the part: "except my last comment..."12:41
haypojaosorior: if you solve my last comment, i'm ok to vote +212:41
haypojaosorior: but i'm not sure that the find subfunction is an issue12:42
jaosoriorNeither am I. I actually think that it's a good approach12:43
*** lbragstad has quit IRC12:45
jaosoriorO_o12:49
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-oslo12:52
*** HenryG has quit IRC12:53
*** dims_ has quit IRC12:59
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-oslo13:05
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:06
*** erecio has quit IRC13:07
*** erecio has joined #openstack-oslo13:08
*** zzzeek has joined #openstack-oslo13:15
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-oslo13:16
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo13:17
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-oslo13:18
*** lbragstad1 has joined #openstack-oslo13:26
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:28
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo13:29
*** lbragstad1 has quit IRC13:30
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo13:30
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed a change to openstack/oslo.i18n: Build locale dir env var name consistently  https://review.openstack.org/9905413:38
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:48
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo13:48
*** lbragstad1 has joined #openstack-oslo13:57
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:58
viktorsbnemec: Hi! Can you please remove your WIP on patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93396/ (Remove common context usage from db model_query()). It's seems to be, that gates are working now :)14:13
bnemecviktors: Done14:14
viktorsbnemec: thanks!14:15
*** lbragstad1 has quit IRC14:16
openstackgerritChristian Berendt proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: switch from mox to mox3  https://review.openstack.org/9372914:17
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-oslo14:20
dhellmannlooks like my znc server died, so resending:14:22
dhellmannmestery: thanks for the heads-up!14:22
dhellmannbnemec, dims_, flaper87: looking at strutils again, I wonder if we should just toss it into oslo.utils instead of making a standalone lib?14:22
mesterydhellmann: No problem. We merged a few patches yesterday, hoping to land a few more and get this done very early in Juno-2.14:23
flaper87dhellmann: That should work although I think there will be more things "text-related" that would fit into oslo.text14:23
openstackgerritRoman Podoliaka proposed a change to openstack/oslo.db: Handle slave database connection in EngineFacade  https://review.openstack.org/9459314:29
dhellmannflaper87: what do you have in mind?14:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9908414:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslo.config: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9908514:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslo.db: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9908614:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslo.i18n: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9623914:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslo.messaging: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9908714:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslotest: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9908814:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslo.vmware: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9908914:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/oslosphinx: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9909014:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/pycadf: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9909114:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/taskflow: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/9325414:40
flaper87dhellmann: mmh, actually, nevermind. I guess if there are more things to add they would be added to the strutils module anyway.14:41
dhellmannyeah, although see my comment about splitting that up into a few modules14:41
haypodhellmann: hi. i saw https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97932/ and i dislike it :-p14:42
haypodhellmann: why not keeping the code in a single file?14:42
dhellmannhaypo: a lot of those functions shouldn't be part of the public API14:42
haypodhellmann: ok, but so just add an underscore prefix14:43
haypoMessage => _Message, that's all14:43
haypowe are all consentent adults here ;)14:43
dhellmannyou're assuming well-behaved consumers of the library14:43
haypodhellmann: if your users uses private things, how a submodule would prevent this?14:44
haypodhellmann: you can import oslo.i18n._locale14:44
dhellmannyeah14:44
dhellmannhaypo: can you explain more than "I don't like it"?14:45
haypoi'm not against splitting code into submodules, but usually i try to group similar functions & classes, here you put a single function in a file. IMO it's harder to navigate in the code which such file hierarchy14:45
haypoin python, the rule is that there is no stability guarantee on the private API. a whole module can go away, same for private functions and classes. private means anything called with a name starting with an underscore14:47
openstackgerritIlya Shakhat proposed a change to openstack/cliff: CSV formatter should use system-dependent line ending  https://review.openstack.org/9910614:47
haypodhellmann: i have a much shorter experience than you in OpenStack, so i don't know which issues you had in the past with the API stability14:48
silehtjd__, can you take a look to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90046/14:49
haypodhellmann: well, maybe i shouldn't vote -1. i just wanted to talk with you14:49
dhellmannhaypo: when we split out oslo.messaging, we tried to keep the public API surface as small as possible14:50
dhellmannno, a -1 is fine, this is good feedback14:50
jd__sileht: doing so14:50
dhellmannhaypo: with oslo.messaging, we did that using private packages for some of the implementation details, and I was following that example here14:50
haypodhellmann: in olso messaging, there is much more code in the private packages14:50
dhellmannhaypo: the enable_lazy function has some global state that I was trying to hid more completely than just prefixing the variable name14:51
haypodhellmann: it makes sense to move the code in private modules14:51
dhellmanns/hid/hide/14:51
dhellmannthe _i18n.py module contains instances of the translator that should be private to this package14:51
dhellmannget_locale_dir_variable_name is only one function, but it is used in a couple of the other modules so it can't go in gettextutils because of a circular import problem14:52
dhellmannthe message and factory classes seemed big enough to warrant their own files14:52
dhellmanntranslate_args is used in a couple of places inside the package, so again it introduced circular imports14:53
dhellmannhaypo: so I could basically have one big file, as before, or I could have a couple of files that are smaller than I'd otherwise make them normally14:53
haypodhellmann: i was shocked by _locale.py which only contains 2 lines of code14:53
haypodhellmann: i didn't read each file carefully yet14:53
haypodhellmann: do you think that users will modify directly _USE_LAZY if it's not in an "hidden" module?14:54
dhellmannhaypo: yeah, that function is tiny but may grow and it's used in _factory14:54
dhellmannhaypo: quite possibly14:54
haypodhellmann: you should warn users that private symbols are private, there is no guarantee of the stability of these variables, functions, etc.14:55
haypobut i expect that any python developers know that14:55
openstackgerritMehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/oslo.messaging: Fix the notify method of the routing notifier  https://review.openstack.org/9240314:56
openstackgerritMehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/oslo.messaging: Transport reconnection retries for notification  https://review.openstack.org/9237314:56
dhellmannhaypo: yes, we're working on educating everyone about that14:56
haypodhellmann: maybe you should rename these private symbols in each minor version to check how many people rely on them :-D14:57
dims_dhellmann, +1 to throw strutils into oslo.utils14:57
dhellmannhaypo: don't tempt me :-)14:58
dhellmanndims_, flaper87 : if we put strutils in oslo.utils, could you two work on the graduation together?15:01
dims_yep15:01
flaper87dhellmann: dims_ absolutely, I've put the olso.text code here: https://github.com/FlaPer87/oslo.text15:02
flaper87at least the tests will be useful from there15:02
dhellmannflaper87: true, good15:03
dhellmanndims_, flaper87 : can one of you take over the utils spec and update it with the strutils file(s)? We should go ahead and think about splitting strutils up into groups that make more sense, too.15:03
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC15:04
haypodhellmann: i removed my -1 vote. as i wrote, i don't want to convince you, just to discuss ;)15:04
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-oslo15:04
dhellmannhaypo: ok, thanks, this was good feedback and I'll take another look at the code and see if maybe I can make less drastic changes :-)15:06
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-oslo15:08
*** ildikov has quit IRC15:09
*** praneshp has joined #openstack-oslo15:13
*** viktors is now known as viktors|afk15:30
*** nacim has quit IRC15:43
*** tkelsey has quit IRC15:55
*** jaosorior has quit IRC16:12
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo16:18
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-oslo16:29
openstackgerritQin Zhao proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Log the function name of looping call  https://review.openstack.org/9915216:35
*** mriedem has quit IRC16:35
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-oslo16:36
openstackgerritAlex Gaynor proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Fixed a new pep8 error and a small typo  https://review.openstack.org/9915816:41
thervedhellmann, I got up on friday's meeting16:41
therves/got/caught16:41
therveNo red flags from Heat16:42
therveThe config generation problem is worked around in master just now as you noticed16:42
therveAnd we'll work on oslo.messaging soon as it's fixed16:43
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed a change to openstack/oslo.i18n: Further improvements to documentation  https://review.openstack.org/9916016:48
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed a change to openstack/oslo.i18n: Improve initial documentation  https://review.openstack.org/9696116:49
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-oslo16:49
*** stannie has quit IRC16:57
*** czzl has joined #openstack-oslo16:58
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja17:08
*** HenryG has quit IRC17:19
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-oslo17:20
*** markmcclain has quit IRC17:25
*** dims_ has quit IRC17:28
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-oslo17:29
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo17:42
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-oslo17:42
rpodolyaka1Hey, oslo cores, can I get +A for a patch that had been approved but failed to merge? (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94593/) :)17:45
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC17:53
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-oslo17:54
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC17:57
dhellmanntherve: cool, thanks for verifying that18:05
dhellmannrpodolyaka1: did that just need a rebase?18:06
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC18:06
*** arnaud has quit IRC18:12
rpodolyaka1dhellmann: yes18:13
dhellmannrpodolyaka1: ok18:13
rpodolyaka1dhellmann: thanks!18:13
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC18:17
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away18:25
*** dims_ has quit IRC18:25
*** jecarey has quit IRC18:29
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-oslo18:31
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-oslo18:33
*** jecarey_ has joined #openstack-oslo18:33
*** jecarey has quit IRC18:37
*** erecio has quit IRC18:48
*** erecio has joined #openstack-oslo18:49
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:56
*** bknudson has quit IRC19:02
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo19:03
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja19:03
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-oslo19:05
*** praneshp_ has joined #openstack-oslo19:06
*** praneshp has quit IRC19:08
*** praneshp_ is now known as praneshp19:08
*** erecio has quit IRC19:10
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-oslo19:10
*** erecio has joined #openstack-oslo19:11
*** czzl has left #openstack-oslo19:22
*** amotoki has quit IRC19:22
*** stannie has joined #openstack-oslo19:26
*** arnaud has quit IRC19:38
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-oslo19:40
*** czzl has joined #openstack-oslo19:56
*** czzl has left #openstack-oslo19:58
*** czzl has joined #openstack-oslo20:00
*** gpocentek has joined #openstack-oslo20:02
openstackgerritGauvain Pocentek proposed a change to openstack/oslo.db: Fix the installation documentation  https://review.openstack.org/9919520:02
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-oslo20:02
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC20:03
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-oslo20:14
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC20:14
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-oslo20:27
*** kmartin has quit IRC20:33
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-oslo20:33
*** kmartin has quit IRC20:33
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-oslo20:33
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-oslo20:41
*** HenryG has quit IRC20:45
*** dhellmann_ has quit IRC20:48
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-oslo20:48
*** bknudson has quit IRC20:54
*** dhellmann has quit IRC20:54
*** bogdando has quit IRC20:54
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC20:54
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann20:54
*** dhellmann has quit IRC20:56
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-oslo20:56
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-oslo21:08
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-oslo21:08
*** markmc has quit IRC21:20
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk21:32
openstackgerritlifeless proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: Semantic version support for pbr  https://review.openstack.org/9660821:37
*** jecarey has quit IRC21:47
*** mriedem has quit IRC21:47
openstackgerritRick Harris proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Restore UUID and human-ID bash completion  https://review.openstack.org/9921621:50
*** dims__ has joined #openstack-oslo21:52
*** dims_ has quit IRC21:54
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-oslo21:55
openstackgerritRick Harris proposed a change to openstack/oslo-incubator: Restore UUID and human-ID bash completion  https://review.openstack.org/9921622:03
*** bknudson has quit IRC22:22
*** bogdando has quit IRC23:04
*** dims__ has quit IRC23:06
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-oslo23:07
*** dims__ has joined #openstack-oslo23:08
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: Add basic support for conditional execution  https://review.openstack.org/9894623:09
*** stannie has left #openstack-oslo23:12
*** praneshp has quit IRC23:30
*** praneshp has joined #openstack-oslo23:33
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: Add basic support for conditional execution  https://review.openstack.org/9894623:34
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack/oslo-specs: Add basic support for conditional execution  https://review.openstack.org/9894623:37
*** yamahata has quit IRC23:46
*** bogdando has quit IRC23:54
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-oslo23:57
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack/taskflow: Update zake to requirements version  https://review.openstack.org/9923723:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!