Wednesday, 2023-04-26

tobberydbergo/08:01
gtemahey08:07
tobberydbergI wonder if we will be the only ones today :-) 08:09
gtemait seems like that, I don't even know why08:09
tobberydbergfkr will not be able to join today, he has a conflicting meeting 08:09
gtemaok08:10
tobberydbergLets start the meeting and see if more people joins...08:13
tobberydberg#startmeeting publiccloud_sig08:13
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Apr 26 08:13:42 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tobberydberg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.08:13
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.08:13
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'publiccloud_sig'08:13
tobberydberg#topic 1. Summary of thoughts PTG08:14
tobberydbergWell this topic and the next ties into each other pretty much 08:14
gtemado we have any outcome of the discussion with Jimmy and co about forum proposal on certification discussion?08:16
tobberydbergWell ... they were not  sure about forum session for it, some things are already happening in that area. But, it we feel that a forum session is the right way, we will try to get that in even if deadline have passed08:18
tobberydbergBut they acknowledge the issue in general I would say08:18
gtemaokay08:18
tobberydbergI wouldn't say the totally agreed wth me with everything though08:19
tobberydbergSo, I think that we should have a session about it if possible08:20
gtemagood08:21
tobberydbergNova team seamed ok with adding the support we talked about regarding the standard properties stuff from their end, but will take quite some time to get it in since if affect APIs. Is that a fair summary of that?08:22
tobberydbergAnd the way forward for that would be a Nova backlog spec08:22
gtemayes, this is correct08:22
tobberydbergFor reference https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/march2023-ptg-publiccloud08:23
gtemaand in the meanwhile SDK implementation would need to be improved to allow better client filtering08:23
tobberydbergyes08:23
tobberydbergto that is the way forward regarding flavors at least. 08:23
tobberydberg*so08:23
NilsMagnus[m]For me it remains a bit unclear what is the actual outcome we're aiming for: are we fine with detail implementations or do we seek for a normative "paper"?08:24
tobberydbergNot sure what you mean NilsMagnus[m] 08:25
tobberydberghttps://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/backlog/approved/robustify-compute-hostnames.html08:25
tobberydbergAbove is an example of what we would need to produce, if that is what you mean by outcome08:26
tobberydbergI guess we will need some discussions with Glance team as well for the images part08:30
tobberydbergJumping topics here...08:30
tobberydberg#topic 3. Forum sessions Vancouver status08:30
tobberydbergNot many here, but did you submit your proposed topic gtema ?08:31
NilsMagnus[m]@toby: so we talked in our team here about filtering and name conventions, as an example. But how does this become "reality" for the users? Do we deem it sufficient that affected teams implement this (option 1) or do we aim for a normative document ("on public cloud matters") describing this (option 2)?08:31
gtemawell, I am on sick leave right now and completely missed the deadline. There is one topic of SDK and OSC together with stephenfin08:32
gtemaand the certification discussion was not submitted08:32
gtemabut I am sure we can get it through if desired08:32
tobberydbergOk. Lets see if we can propose those outsie of the deadline08:33
NilsMagnus[m]okay, then there is/was some confusion here, since I thought we signed up for a session, but then it's probably just me who got confused08:34
gtematrying to find email to see remember what Jimmy was thinking08:35
NilsMagnus[m](I was talking with Jimmy about session matters, but not specifically about this one)08:35
tobberydbergNilsMagnus[m] .. I would say it is a combination, some changes in code would give better possibilities for "guidelines"08:35
NilsMagnus[m]The CfP-engine is slow ...08:37
tobberydbergI can reach out to Jimmy and see if we can get it in 08:39
NilsMagnus[m]no, I have just this poly-language-support registered as a forum session, which is touching our topic here only very reotely. +1 for reaching out to jimmy08:40
tobberydbergMaybe even create another session regarding the standard properties? Or should we try to join/suggest thos to operator hours for Nova and Glance?08:41
gtemanot sure that operator hours are fitting perfectly, but i should be still ok in my eyes08:41
tobberydbergBetter with a forum session potentially? 08:42
tobberydbergI see if I can write something up...08:43
gtemamaybe even then PTG rather then forum directly? We can get more "dev" attention on the discussion08:43
tobberydbergtrue08:44
tobberydberghave you seen anything regarding team signup for PTG?08:44
gtemawe can still go to operator hours to ask what other operators are thinking on some props standartisation08:44
gtemano, there was nothing so far08:44
tobberydbergfor sure08:46
tobberydbergGood, then we hold on for that 08:46
tobberydberg#topic 4. Timeslot change proposal08:46
tobberydbergWould like to touch on this as well, even if we are not that many people here today...08:46
tobberydbergWould 0700 UTC work for you? 08:47
gtemahehe, great to ask when just 3 person are in08:47
gtemaduring DST - it is ok for me, on wintertime it is surely not great anymore08:47
tobberydbergYea, I know ... will be hard to make a decision on that today08:47
tobberydbergthat will mean 0800 local time during winter... 08:48
tobberydbergfor you that is :-) 08:48
gtemasaying 8:00 GMT (not UTC)08:49
gtemaah, this does not have DST either08:50
tobberydbergthis meeting is right now 0800 UTC, so 0900 during winter and 1000 during summer08:50
tobberydbergchange request is to put it an hour earlier...08:51
gtemacorrect, 0800 during winter time for us sitting in Europe is not too great08:51
gtemaI would agree on changing it now and bringing it back in October08:51
tobberydbergWhich is totally fine for me as well. This freaking daylight saving time...08:52
tobberydbergI can put that in the notes for this meeting for people to review and we can push the decision so people get time to comment on it.08:53
gtemaright, but I would also not agree on sticking at winter time (light between 0300 - 2000 in summer is terrible)08:53
tobberydbergI would agree to stick on summertime :-) 08:54
tobberydberglighter longer in the afternoon, morning doesnät matter, get enough light from the screens at that time ;-) 08:54
gtemaI am really worrying on getting light way to early when everybody sleeps and dark when people still want to be out in garden08:55
tobberydbergexactly 08:55
tobberydbergANd if they also could agree to give us 20 more degrees during winder it would be awesome ;-) 08:56
gtemalol08:56
tobberydbergAnything else before we close the shop for today?08:57
gtemanot from my side08:57
tobberydbergOk. Then I think we wrap up. Talk to you all (!!!) in two weeks ;-) 09:00
gtemathank you too, see ya09:00
tobberydberg#endmeeting09:00
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Apr 26 09:00:49 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:00
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/publiccloud_sig/2023/publiccloud_sig.2023-04-26-08.13.html09:00
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/publiccloud_sig/2023/publiccloud_sig.2023-04-26-08.13.txt09:00
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/publiccloud_sig/2023/publiccloud_sig.2023-04-26-08.13.log.html09:00

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!