| frickler | ttx: yes, I added the repo topic to the list, sorry that I couldn't attend yesterday. from the PTG I wasn't sure whether there is consensus to proceed with it, but as that seems to be the case, I can help with it, too | 07:55 |
|---|---|---|
| frickler | the two major initial questions would be: how to name the repo and under which path to publish it | 07:55 |
| frickler | I'd propose simply "openstack/large-scale-sig" for the former, I'll have a look at the docs site to see whether something better than simply "https://docs.openstack.org/large-scale-sig/" can be found | 07:57 |
| frickler | though that second question could also be postponed for now, moving a publishing site is much easier than renaming a repo once it has been created | 07:58 |
| ttx | frickler: this would explicitly cover the "large scale journey" so ideally we would publish at https://docs.openstack.org/large-scale-journey or https://docs.openstack.org/large-scale | 08:11 |
| ttx | Can the repo name be difefrent from the publishing directory name? | 08:12 |
| ttx | If yes, I'd agree with "openstack/large-scale-sig" since that gives us more flexibility in the future | 08:12 |
| ttx | If not, I would consider naming it openstack/large-scale-journey instead | 08:12 |
| frickler | ttx: hmm, good question. I think the location can be different, but it would be more consistent to have it the same. so how about going for just "openstack/large-scale" as the repo name? | 08:16 |
| frickler | that would in fact also cover the case that at some point in the future the name of the project might change from sig to wg or whatever | 08:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!