opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add flavor scanning to migrate_to_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924110 | 03:55 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add flavor scanning to migrate_to_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924110 | 04:45 |
*** chuanm087 is now known as chuanm08 | 06:35 | |
opendevreview | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Critical change for 2023.1/Antelope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/934720 | 06:47 |
opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for showing finish_time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928933 | 06:56 |
opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add [quota]unified_limits_required_resources list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924025 | 08:22 |
opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Update Nova bdm with updated swap info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/929858 | 09:35 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Change note:: to warning:: for service user token https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928308 | 12:22 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Correct unified limits CLI commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924888 | 12:22 |
ratailor | melwitt, Could you please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873901 | 13:07 |
mina | Hi everyone, I've just sent a merge request for Nova and was wondering if someone can have a look when that's possible. The MR link is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933311. Thank you very much in advance! | 13:17 |
opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix case-sensitivity for metadata keys https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873901 | 13:21 |
opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix concurrent migration of vms with multiattach volume failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872278 | 13:23 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose per-process-healthchecks for Epoxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/934028 | 13:41 |
*** haleyb|out is now known as haleyb | 13:53 | |
sean-k-mooney | mina: im sorry to say that i dont think that change is inlien with how nova should operate | 14:23 |
sean-k-mooney | i get why you may want to block callign it on instnaces that are shleved but as gibi noted in the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1913016/comments/2 we dont want to make reset-sate smarter | 14:24 |
sean-k-mooney | i could see use removing the api entirly or expanding the state you can reset too or other api changes via a new microversion i.e. blockign it when its shelve in a new microversion | 14:26 |
sean-k-mooney | but config driven api behaivor is not inline with how the nova api is intended to work | 14:26 |
mina | gibi & sean-k-mooney: Thank you for the comments and suggestions. I understand that. I will rewrite my proposal, probably introducing the changes via a new microversion as suggested. Thank you all again. | 14:40 |
artom_ | bauzas, hey, because of the downstream chat about mdev live migration, I'm looking at your series - you've thought of rolling upgrades, right? I just don't see a compute service version bump, or similar checks at first glance, but I'm probably missing something | 14:41 |
bauzas | artom_: no, we automatically detect whether the target supports it by the object | 14:41 |
sean-k-mooney | mina: a new microversion solve the interop issue and upgrade impact, peopel depending on the old behavior can use the old microversion, and in general we can make it safer for people using the newest microversion | 14:42 |
sean-k-mooney | artom_: we didnt add one because of how its working | 14:42 |
artom_ | sean-k-mooney, bauzas, OK OK, I trust you, thanks :) | 14:42 |
*** artom_ is now known as artom | 14:42 | |
mina | sean-k-mooney: Thanks for the clarification. That helps me work on the spec, then. | 14:48 |
tkajinam | ummmmmmm https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/2087982 | 15:49 |
bauzas | #startmeeting nova | 16:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Nov 12 16:00:33 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | 16:00 |
* gibi is on a parallel meeting... | 16:00 | |
elodilles | o/ | 16:01 |
fwiesel | o/ | 16:01 |
* bauzas is also on a parallel meeting | 16:02 | |
tkajinam | o/ | 16:02 |
Uggla | o/ | 16:02 |
bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | 16:06 |
bauzas | sorry, the agenda was not prepared | 16:06 |
bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | 16:07 |
bauzas | #info No Critical bug | 16:07 |
bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | 16:07 |
tkajinam | there is an issue with os-vif which is currently blocking its CI. https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/2087982 | 16:08 |
tkajinam | this needs to be fixed to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/932436 which is required to bump oslo.utils | 16:08 |
tkajinam | I'm unsure if I can take time immediately to dig into it... it'd be really appreciated if anyone can help fixing it | 16:09 |
bauzas | eesh ok | 16:09 |
bauzas | any volunteer is appreciated, indeed | 16:10 |
bauzas | moving on | 16:10 |
bauzas | #topic Gate status | 16:11 |
bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | 16:11 |
* dansmith lurks | 16:11 | |
bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | 16:11 |
bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | 16:11 |
bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | 16:11 |
bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | 16:11 |
bauzas | so the os-vif bug doesn't impact our gate but blocks new os-vif features | 16:12 |
bauzas | anything else to mention about CI ? | 16:13 |
tkajinam | nothing else from me | 16:14 |
bauzas | ok | 16:16 |
bauzas | #topic Release Planning | 16:16 |
bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html | 16:16 |
bauzas | #action bauzas to add Epoxy nova deadlines in the schedule | 16:17 |
bauzas | we agreed at the PTG to have a spec review day this week | 16:17 |
bauzas | (R-20) | 16:17 |
bauzas | I just noticed that today (I was on PTO yesterday) | 16:17 |
bauzas | so if you're OK, I propose to have the spec review day by Thursday | 16:18 |
bauzas | any objection ? | 16:18 |
bauzas | looks not | 16:20 |
bauzas | #agreed Spec review day will be happening on Thursday Nov 14th | 16:20 |
bauzas | #action bauzas to communicate it thru openstack-discuss@ | 16:20 |
bauzas | sharpen your pens, folks. | 16:20 |
bauzas | any other point ? | 16:21 |
bauzas | if not, let's move on | 16:21 |
bauzas | #topic Review priorities | 16:22 |
bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | 16:22 |
bauzas | nothing to say more, we should have more items in the etherpad soon | 16:22 |
bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | 16:22 |
bauzas | elodilles: you're still here ? | 16:23 |
elodilles | yepp | 16:23 |
elodilles | #info stable/202*.* gates seem to be OK | 16:23 |
elodilles | at least, as usual, i'm not aware of any gate issue | 16:23 |
elodilles | and haven't seen any added to the stable CI etherpad | 16:23 |
elodilles | #info 2023.1 Antelope transition to 'unmaintained': https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/934463 | 16:23 |
elodilles | waiting for a quick approve from the team ^^^ o:) | 16:24 |
elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | 16:24 |
elodilles | please add here if you see any stable gate issue ^^^ | 16:24 |
elodilles | and that was all from me about stable branches | 16:25 |
bauzas | thanks | 16:25 |
bauzas | I basically ack'd the Antelope unmaintained proposed patch | 16:26 |
bauzas | moving on | 16:26 |
bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | 16:26 |
elodilles | bauzas: thx o/ | 16:26 |
bauzas | fwiesel: anything to mention ? | 16:26 |
fwiesel | Not really. The master branch looks stable (only the two failures I need to fix), but there is some bug in the pipeline to fix for older releases | 16:27 |
bauzas | oh that's good news | 16:27 |
bauzas | thanks | 16:28 |
bauzas | I guess we can wrap then | 16:28 |
bauzas | #topic Open discussion | 16:28 |
bauzas | nothing in the agenda for today, anything anyone ? | 16:28 |
bauzas | looks not | 16:29 |
bauzas | thanks all | 16:29 |
bauzas | and apologies for the boring meeting, I was mostly off the first 10 mins | 16:29 |
bauzas | bye | 16:29 |
bauzas | #endmeeting | 16:29 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Nov 12 16:29:28 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:29 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-11-12-16.00.html | 16:29 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-11-12-16.00.txt | 16:29 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-11-12-16.00.log.html | 16:29 |
tkajinam | thanks | 16:29 |
elodilles | thanks o/ | 16:29 |
fwiesel | thanks o/ | 16:33 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Skip functional tests on pre-commit config update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933192 | 16:35 |
opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix add/remove SecurityGroup action json schemas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/934823 | 18:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!