Monday, 2023-05-15

opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Delete dangling bdms  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88228406:33
dvo-plvgibi, sean-k-mooney, sbauza: Hello. I have update nova code after os-traits release. Coud you please review packed ring support bp: https://review.opendev.org/q/bp/virtio07:28
bauzassean-k-mooney: could you please give a +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882786 so I could prepare both a 2023.1 and Zed releases for both the CVEs ?08:08
bauzas(or any stable core, like gibi) ^08:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Bump nova-ceph-multstore timeout  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88278408:23
zigoHi! I'm trying to backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882869 to Victoria. So far, it seems working, except, I have a unit test failure:09:03
zigohttps://paste.opendev.org/show/br48JgltG6neK70WbkQA/09:03
zigoThis is in the new unit test test_cleanup_disconnect_volume()09:03
zigoDoes anyone know what I can do?09:03
zigoI really would prefer to keep that unit test if possible ...09:04
zigomelwitt: ^09:04
dvo-plvbauzas: Hello. I have update nova code after os-traits release. Coud you please review packed ring support bp: https://review.opendev.org/q/bp/virtio09:58
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds cleanup to remove dangling volumes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/87875711:18
sean-k-mooneydvo-plv: the code looks ok but your missing test coverage11:30
dvo-plvseean-k-mooney: We would like to implement tests after code approval in the separate bp. Does it possible, or we should to create a test immediately?11:41
sean-k-mooneydvo-plv: no11:42
sean-k-mooneywe do not merge untested code in genral11:42
sean-k-mooneyso you need to have tests either in the same commmit or a followup commit11:42
sean-k-mooneyif its in a followup we will hold the first commit until we are happy with both and then merge them togeter11:43
sean-k-mooneyfor openstack we treat master as if all commits could be deployed to production. 11:44
sean-k-mooneyfor lareger feature we genreally gate multi commit feature by having the change that enables the feature to be used last in the serise 11:44
dvo-plvI think we will implement and update this commit with tests coverage11:45
sean-k-mooneythat works11:45
*** haleyb_ is now known as haleyb15:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/yoga: Use force=True for os-brick disconnect during delete  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88286315:31
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/yoga: Enable use of service user token with admin context  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88286415:33
*** Guest1107 is now known as atmark17:04
*** d34dh0r5- is now known as d34dh0r5317:07
dansmithfungi: if we change the wallaby implementation of the cve fix in gerrit (to address the thing raised in the bug), do we have to update errata or not?17:24
dansmiththe patch was in the bug, but wallaby should be out of bounds now17:24
fungitechnically we don't need to reference it because that branch is no longer under normal maintenance17:30
fungithough i might amend the errata list with it and just not announce that so as to keep the noise level to a minimum17:31
fungiwe have a bit of flexibility with branches no longer under normal maintenance since those fixes are merely being included as a convenience and on a best-effort basis17:32
dansmithack, cool17:32
dansmithI think you said "patches for older branches are appreciated but not required" so I just didn't know how that mapped to "provided as a courtesy and then changed"17:32
dansmithmelwitt: ^17:32
fungiit's sort of a grey area17:33
dansmithI'm a walking grey area17:33
fungiwe didn't provide any non-nova wallaby patches anyway17:33
fungieverything else stopped at xena (which is also no longer under normal maintenance at this point)17:34
* dansmith nods17:34
melwittfungi: I had named the patch nova-2004555-xena_and_wallaby.patch erroneously thinking xena and wallaby were identical but it's really just nova-2004555-xena.patch17:35
fungimakes sense17:35
fungifor the downstream notification (and advisory of course) i split them up17:36
melwittoh, I see17:36
fungilots of the patches were "this applies to branches x and y" so i made separate identical branch x and branch y patches, because we don't want consumers to have to sort through a maze of patch name to branch mappings17:37
dansmithmelwitt: you're probably going to have to fix the job config on wallaby if you actually want to merge it too17:41
melwittfungi: that makes sense17:41
dansmiththe recent cinder tempest plugin changes for the ceph job have broken it.. I think just disabling the ceph job on wallaby is probably best17:41
melwittdansmith: good point17:41
melwittI at least wanted the current ps to be correct if anyone pulls it manually17:42
dansmithyeah17:43
dansmithwell, it'll help the ubuntu wallaby patches and the reporter at least17:43
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Use force=True for os-brick disconnect during delete  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88286917:47
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Enable use of service user token with admin context  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88287017:47
dansmithjamespage: you might want to notice this ^ update along with the traffic on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/200455518:08
dansmithrelated to the ubuntu packages for that cve18:08
fungijamespage: also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ossa/+/883202 "Add errata 3 for OSSA-2023-003"18:54
sean-k-mooneyi tought the general guidancce was to not track the ubuntu package state in the laucnchpad bug and only use them for the upstream openstack projects19:28
sean-k-mooneyi was always toold it was conidered rude to add the disto pacakges to the bug at elast when i was at intel my perception was it caused consution with regards to is this fixed on the upstream branch or downstream branch19:29
melwittzigo: I looked into the victoria issue, note that I updated the wallaby patch review for something different so please pull the latest one. besides that, I think you can add something like 'mount_device': None here under connection_info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882869/2/nova/tests/unit/virt/libvirt/test_driver.py#19646 to pass the test19:34
melwittthe victoria code expects an additional key 'mount_device' key in the block_device_mapping19:38
melwitt*an additional key in19:38
*** dmellado92 is now known as dmellado920:07
*** dmellado92 is now known as dmellado920:16
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/xena: CI: fix backport validator for new branch naming  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88296722:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!