| opendevreview | xielijie proposed openstack/nova master: Persist connection_info to bdm table https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865214 | 01:19 |
|---|---|---|
| *** tkajinam is now known as Guest2162 | 02:04 | |
| opendevreview | Jorhson Deng proposed openstack/nova master: Use the page's memory not host_cell.memory for small pagesize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864812 | 02:22 |
| opendevreview | Jorhson Deng proposed openstack/nova master: Use the page's memory not host_cell.memory for small pagesize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864812 | 03:05 |
| *** tkajinam is now known as Guest2174 | 03:28 | |
| *** tkajinam is now known as Guest2179 | 05:36 | |
| opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: [stable-only] Use os-brick from source in wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865134 | 06:30 |
| opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864691 | 06:31 |
| opendevreview | Jorhson Deng proposed openstack/nova master: Use the page's memory not host_cell.memory for small pagesize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864812 | 07:52 |
| han-guangyu | hi, when i use vnc to access a instance with GUI | 10:21 |
| han-guangyu | The operation is clunky and sometimes disconnects | 10:22 |
| han-guangyu | I would like to ask what configuration can I do to improve this problem | 10:22 |
| han-guangyu | when instance without GUI, it is normal | 10:23 |
| *** labedz_ is now known as labedz | 10:34 | |
| sean-k-mooney | han-guangyu: the default video model is cirros. using virtio-gpu or vga video model will improve performance of a gui in the vm signifcatly | 11:20 |
| sean-k-mooney | see hw_video_model in https://docs.openstack.org/glance/latest/admin/useful-image-properties.html | 11:21 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Remove double mocking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864934 | 11:54 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Remove double mocking... again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864935 | 11:54 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Add compute restart capability for libvirt func tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864936 | 11:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok finally ^ should hopefully pass the unit and functional tests now | 11:54 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: enable blocked VDPA move operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864937 | 11:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | the backprot to xena was not terrible in the end but we have some functional test coverage in those patches for feature that done exist there like the lightos volume driver and nova manage imageproty migrtion commands | 11:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | fortuently fixing that is just deleting the test file in both cases | 11:57 |
| han-guangyu | sean-k-mooney: Thank you, i will try it | 12:05 |
| han-guangyu | sean-k-mooney: sorry to bother again, Is there any configuration that nova-novncproxy can optimize | 12:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: just an fyi https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7ab233fe2c604e3babf27e1a1fb704b8/log/job-output.txt#3412 some of our train jobs seam to have moved to focal | 12:11 |
| han-guangyu | when I want to acces a vm with GUI in horizon | 12:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | form bionic i assume this is related to the cahnge to jammy on master | 12:11 |
| han-guangyu | just a confirm, if not, I just the hw_video_model | 12:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | han-guangyu: no we currently dont have any optimizations on the proxy | 12:19 |
| han-guangyu | hi, ok | 12:20 |
| han-guangyu | thank you very much | 12:20 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: thanks, i'll look into it to figure out why it is on focal | 12:45 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 13:55 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/xena: Move mtu update request into ovsdb transaction https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/863995 | 14:40 |
| *** blarnath is now known as d34dh0r53 | 14:53 | |
| bauzas | reminder : nova meeting in 29 mins | 15:31 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: DNM: test nova-multi-cell job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865301 | 15:45 |
| elodilles | bauzas: may i do a last minute edit on the stable section or do you still editing the Agenda? | 15:46 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/train: DNM: test nova-multi-cell job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865302 | 15:46 |
| bauzas | elodilles: I haven't yet updated it, so do it | 15:46 |
| elodilles | bauzas: thx, done | 15:47 |
| bauzas | elodilles: kk, doing it now | 15:48 |
| bauzas | #startmeeting nova | 16:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Nov 22 16:01:01 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | 16:01 |
| elodilles | o/ | 16:01 |
| bauzas | sorry folks, forgot we had an internal meeting at the same time | 16:02 |
| bauzas | not sure we'll have a lot of folks around | 16:02 |
| jsanemet | hello o/ | 16:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | o/ | 16:03 |
| Uggla | o/ | 16:03 |
| bauzas | ok, let's start then | 16:03 |
| bauzas | actually, I forgot to provide my PTG notes for the internal meeting :D | 16:04 |
| bauzas | so I won't need to discuss :) | 16:04 |
| bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | 16:04 |
| bauzas | #info No Critical bug | 16:04 |
| dansmith | o/ | 16:04 |
| bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 11 new untriaged bugs (+4 since the last meeting) | 16:04 |
| bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | 16:04 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: can you use the bug baton for next week ? | 16:05 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Reproduce bug 1896463 in func env https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841288 | 16:05 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Set instance host and drop migration under lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841444 | 16:05 |
| sean-k-mooney | i guess but its likely the last round i can do this year | 16:05 |
| bauzas | all cool | 16:05 |
| gibi | o/ | 16:07 |
| bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to sean-k-mooney | 16:07 |
| bauzas | any bug to discuss or do we move on ? | 16:07 |
| bauzas | (please say the latter :) ) | 16:07 |
| bauzas | k, moving on | 16:08 |
| bauzas | #topic Gate status | 16:09 |
| bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | 16:09 |
| bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | 16:09 |
| bauzas | huzzah, the periodics are back \o/ | 16:09 |
| bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | 16:09 |
| bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | 16:09 |
| bauzas | anything to discuss about gate ? | 16:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | just a note | 16:11 |
| bauzas | sure | 16:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | the gate should now be jammy/22.04 | 16:11 |
| bauzas | have we merged the changes ? | 16:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | the base jobs changed at m1 | 16:12 |
| bauzas | sorry, was a bit off the IRC channel during those two days | 16:12 |
| bauzas | kk | 16:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | so i belive they merged last week | 16:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | anywya just keep an eye out and see if there are any new issues | 16:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | thats all i wanted to raise | 16:13 |
| bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861111 | 16:13 |
| bauzas | so the base jobs seem to have been merged indeed, but not our jobs | 16:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | actully that patch is keeping one job on focal | 16:14 |
| bauzas | gmann: can you help us by explaining what we do atm ? | 16:14 |
| bauzas | yes, like 2 years ago | 16:14 |
| sean-k-mooney | although i woudl argue grenade shoudl be that job | 16:14 |
| bauzas | we keep an old job | 16:14 |
| sean-k-mooney | i dont think we need a new one | 16:14 |
| bauzas | and then we run all the other tempest jobs with the latest ubuntu version | 16:14 |
| bauzas | yeah so | 16:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | this cycle the grenade jobs shoudl be on focal which shoudl provide enough test coverage | 16:15 |
| bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/861116 Base jobs are migrated to Jammy | 16:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | ill comment on the review | 16:16 |
| bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861111 Nova specific jobs migration to Jammy need to be reviewed | 16:16 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: me too | 16:16 |
| bauzas | ok, anything else ? | 16:16 |
| sean-k-mooney | nope | 16:16 |
| sean-k-mooney | not from me | 16:16 |
| bauzas | moving on | 16:17 |
| bauzas | #topic Release Planning | 16:18 |
| bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html | 16:18 |
| bauzas | #info Antelope-1 was last week | 16:18 |
| bauzas | #info Spec review day had 6 specs merged and more than 10 others being discussed. | 16:18 |
| bauzas | kudos to the reviewers who worked on it | 16:18 |
| bauzas | as a reminder, we will get another spec review day in a couple of weeks before milestone-2 | 16:19 |
| bauzas | we should also plan some implementation review day around between a-1 and a-2 | 16:19 |
| bauzas | voilà, anything to discuss about either the spec review day or antelope-1 ? | 16:20 |
| bauzas | fwiw, we merged a release for novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/861360 | 16:21 |
| bauzas | and ditto for os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864527 | 16:21 |
| bauzas | if no questions, let's move on | 16:22 |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 16:23 | |
| bauzas | sorry, I'm being dragged in a meeting, can someone continue ? | 16:26 |
| bauzas | gibi: ? | 16:26 |
| gibi | sure I will try | 16:27 |
| gibi | #topic Review priorities | 16:27 |
| gibi | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | 16:27 |
| gibi | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | 16:27 |
| gibi | is there anything we need to discuss on these priorities? | 16:27 |
| gibi | #topic Stable Branches | 16:28 |
| gibi | elodilles: your turn :) | 16:28 |
| gibi | I have a quetion on stable/train | 16:29 |
| elodilles | #info wallaby is blocked due to failing nova-ceph-multistore, workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865134 | 16:29 |
| elodilles | this is an interesting one, stable cores, please review if possible ^^^ | 16:29 |
| elodilles | #info ussuri and train is blocked due to nova-multi-cell job, possible fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/865300 | 16:29 |
| elodilles | ^^^ thanks sean-k-mooney for calling my attention to the issue :) | 16:30 |
| elodilles | #info rest of the stable branches should be OK | 16:30 |
| elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | 16:30 |
| sean-k-mooney | i appoved the first one addign os-brick to requried project will also make depends on work | 16:30 |
| elodilles | and that's it from my side | 16:30 |
| gibi | elodilles: do you know about any issues on stable/train | 16:31 |
| bauzas | ok, I'm back | 16:31 |
| gibi | I see multiple job failing with | 16:31 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: thanks. i think that is the most straightforward workaround for the situation | 16:31 |
| gibi | rsync: [sender] link_stat "/var/lib/zuul/builds/eacfbbe59b6a4297a4aebb16cc7d2140/work/ca-bundle.pem" failed: No such file or directory (2) | 16:31 |
| gibi | rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1333) [sender=3.2.3] | 16:31 |
| gibi | ie https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841444/4 | 16:31 |
| gibi | s/ie/eg/ | 16:32 |
| elodilles | gibi: rsync problem usually happened due to infra issues, but those usually temporary / intermittent issues | 16:32 |
| elodilles | gibi: train is blocked, see above :) | 16:33 |
| gibi | I got it mutliple times. I did a rebase at the start of the meeting if that hits the same I will ping the team again as that will mean it is blocked | 16:33 |
| bauzas | #chair gibi | 16:33 |
| opendevmeet | Current chairs: bauzas gibi | 16:33 |
| bauzas | (just added gibi for chair, not sure the bot will correctly set the topics) | 16:33 |
| gibi | elodilles: aaah, | 16:33 |
| gibi | sorry it is a bit hard to be on two meetings in parallel | 16:33 |
| gibi | so we know that train is broken | 16:33 |
| elodilles | :S | 16:33 |
| gibi | then I have no other question :) | 16:33 |
| elodilles | gibi: yepp, but not with the rsync error | 16:34 |
| elodilles | so that's a new thing if it is a permanent problem :( | 16:34 |
| gibi | interesting | 16:34 |
| bauzas | we should name the train bug "sncf" as train is always broken :) | 16:34 |
| gibi | anyhow I will report back if the same failure happens in the recent rebase too | 16:34 |
| elodilles | gibi: ack, thx | 16:34 |
| gibi | I thank you :) | 16:35 |
| gibi | any other topics on stable? | 16:35 |
| bauzas | looks not | 16:35 |
| bauzas | moving on ? | 16:35 |
| bauzas | I'll need to speak in a little | 16:36 |
| gibi | #topic Open discussion | 16:36 |
| gibi | (jsanemet) Improve usage of privsep on Nova: | 16:36 |
| gibi | Bug ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1996213 Proposal: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review Does the change deserve a spec? | 16:36 |
| bauzas | yeah so | 16:36 |
| gibi | jsanemet: on the spec question. Do you feel you have open question that would need upfront decision from the core team? | 16:37 |
| bauzas | I discussed with jsanemet about his efforts and I proposed him to present himself and discuss about how we could paper the privsep effort during the meeting | 16:37 |
| bauzas | the spec thing was more a wonder we had | 16:37 |
| bauzas | I don't honestly feel it requires one spec | 16:37 |
| bauzas | but we tho need to consider documenting the new context usages | 16:38 |
| bauzas | hence the etherpad | 16:38 |
| jsanemet | hello | 16:38 |
| bauzas | I don't see any upgrade impact, or any other impact which would require us to accept a spedc | 16:38 |
| bauzas | anyone disagree with that plan ? | 16:39 |
| dansmith | what is the effort? just finishing some things? | 16:40 |
| dansmith | or something more complex? | 16:40 |
| bauzas | dansmith: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review | 16:40 |
| bauzas | dansmith: this is about fine-graining the privsep context to the right callers | 16:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | there are several | 16:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | this looks like the first low haning fruit | 16:40 |
| dansmith | yeah so splitting into different contexts? | 16:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | yep | 16:41 |
| bauzas | as a first step yes | 16:41 |
| dansmith | I dunno, I think that's going to be a bunch of review of which calls need which contexts right? | 16:41 |
| bauzas | that's my concern | 16:41 |
| dansmith | some things might seem simple but require both net and sys, etc | 16:41 |
| bauzas | I don't think we need a spec | 16:41 |
| bauzas | but, | 16:41 |
| dansmith | I guess I'm not sure why no spec | 16:42 |
| bauzas | I'd appreciate if we would agree on the contexts and the callers not exacly by reviewing the patches | 16:42 |
| dansmith | this etherpad is half a spec already | 16:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | there proably should be a spec to define the scope | 16:42 |
| dansmith | agree | 16:42 |
| bauzas | there, we have our answer | 16:42 |
| bauzas | we can use the spec format to agree on the split | 16:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | sure | 16:42 |
| bauzas | jsanemet: you're ok with the outcome ? | 16:43 |
| bauzas | I can help you on the process-y thingie | 16:43 |
| jsanemet | sure | 16:44 |
| jsanemet | then, i will translate the etherpad into a spec and we can discuss it further | 16:44 |
| jsanemet | seems good to me | 16:44 |
| bauzas | from a paperwork pov, you may also need to supersede the rfe bug by creating a launchpad blueprint | 16:44 |
| bauzas | but that's an easy peasy | 16:44 |
| bauzas | anyway, looks like we have the direction | 16:45 |
| jsanemet | yes, i am a little green regarding what documentation is required so any help will be appreciated | 16:45 |
| bauzas | jsanemet: as a reminder, you have a spec template https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2023.1/template.html | 16:45 |
| bauzas | I guess that's it for today | 16:46 |
| jsanemet | all right, i will save that | 16:46 |
| jsanemet | thanks a lot | 16:46 |
| bauzas | ok, folks, any other item to raise before we call the wrap ? | 16:46 |
| bauzas | looks not | 16:46 |
| bauzas | perfect timing | 16:47 |
| bauzas | thanks all | 16:47 |
| bauzas | #endmeeting | 16:47 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Nov 22 16:47:08 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:47 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-22-16.01.html | 16:47 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-22-16.01.txt | 16:47 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-22-16.01.log.html | 16:47 |
| gibi | :) | 16:47 |
| elodilles | thanks bauzas o/ | 16:47 |
| gibi | thanks folks | 16:47 |
| jsanemet | thanks o/ | 16:47 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: bauzas: replied on focal new job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861111/5/.zuul.yaml#653 | 17:36 |
| gmann | basically grenade job run only smoke test not all the tests. having a integrated job running on focal cover it well | 17:36 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: im not sure we want full coverage since we are only supprotign it for upgrade but we could i guess | 17:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | we run more then smoke in the multinode grenade job by the way | 17:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | liek cold/live migration | 17:38 |
| gmann | that was point there in PTG, to make sure we run the complete tests | 17:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | that kind fo feels like overkill to me | 17:38 |
| gmann | that is why we added Focal i testing runtime too https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/2023.1.html | 17:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | we never did that for moving form 18.04->20.04 did we | 17:38 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: this is new change we discussed in TC | 17:39 |
| gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/860599 | 17:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok but if its just for upgrade im not sure we shoudl do more then run multinode grenade | 17:39 |
| gmann | multinode grenade does not run complete tests, if testing runtime have requirement of testing Focal I feel we should run integrated tests on that not just grenade small set of tests | 17:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | i disagree | 17:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | your are correct on the tests that are run https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L512 | 17:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | """In this release, we are adding the testing of Ubuntu new version 22.04. For smooth upgrade, we will continue the minimum testing for previously supported Ubuntu version in this release.""" | 17:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | it specificaly say we will continue the minium testing for previous supported ubuntu verions | 17:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | that is not tempest-full | 17:42 |
| gmann | minimum testing means at least single job running the tests and we knew grenade job is there but adding this explicitly to make sure things does not get broken on old distro | 17:42 |
| gmann | not all the jobs | 17:42 |
| gmann | "run all jobs on latest distro, have at least one job to run on old distro" | 17:43 |
| gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/860599/5/reference/project-testing-interface.rst#191 | 17:43 |
| sean-k-mooney | are we going to have to do the same for debian 11 when 12 comes out | 17:43 |
| gmann | we should do but we will see where all we are running debian jobs and there we should make sure there same | 17:44 |
| gmann | the same | 17:44 |
| sean-k-mooney | we dont have ci capsity for that | 17:44 |
| sean-k-mooney | fine lets just stick with this for now but i dont think we can reasonable run all LTS distros for 2 releases | 17:45 |
| gmann | debian jobs are not run on projects side (there might be few) but say if devstack run it then we should do both when we change the debian version in testing | 17:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | in the B cycle we shoudl drop the job | 17:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | and only test with 22.04 | 17:46 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: true, that will be removed in next cycle of change in distro version, so for Focal yes in B | 17:46 |
| gmann | it is only the cycle changing the testing to new version will make sure old version is also tested. | 17:46 |
| gmann | we can do a lot of upgrade testing with distro things but we cannot do as per our CI capacity so this single job for changing version cycle is good way to accommodate something and make sure upgrade will be more smooth | 17:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: [stable-only] Use os-brick from source in wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865134 | 18:18 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Update gate jobs as per the 2023.1 cycle testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861111 | 19:44 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Update gate jobs as per the 2023.1 cycle testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/861470 | 19:47 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/os-traits master: Update python classifier for python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/861466 | 19:48 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Update python classifier for python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/861469 | 19:48 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: os-vif functional sudo job failing on Jammy, I think you mentioned you have some idea to fix that?, https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/b40811601a614064a480a02e368c2f72 | 19:54 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 20:31 | |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: i looked at it breifly but did not try to fix it yet | 20:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: debian used to have a pathced version of distutils that did weired things with the python path | 20:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | the funtional tests use sudo and we use -E to preserve teh env | 20:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | there is a weired interaction between sudo and virutalenv and -E | 20:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | so my guess was that has changed on 22.04 | 20:43 |
| sean-k-mooney | and the pythonpath in a sudo context is not finding os-vif | 20:43 |
| sean-k-mooney | possibly because it might be doing a user install or similar | 20:43 |
| sean-k-mooney | ill need to try and repoduce it locally to figure out whats going on exactly i just have not had time to look at it | 20:44 |
| sean-k-mooney | but thats what i think is happening we are runnign privsep with sudo -E and its not finding the installed os-vif for some reason | 20:44 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: refactor: remove duplicated logic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865334 | 20:59 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Detect port-resource-request-groups neutron API extension https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865335 | 20:59 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Record SRIOV PF MAC in the binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865336 | 20:59 |
| opendevreview | Anton Kurbatov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix VMs sorting fail in case of comparison with None https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865037 | 21:08 |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 22:25 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!