opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Adds a repoducer for post live migration fail https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854499 | 05:41 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: [compute] always set instance.host in post_livemigration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791135 | 05:41 |
gokhanisi | Hello folks, after deleting vm glance image, we can not reboot vm, because it can't find _base image and after that nova destroyed my vm automatically. this the expected state or is there any mechanism to prevent automatic deletion? | 07:09 |
*** akekane__ is now known as abhishekk | 09:42 | |
sean-k-mooney[m] | gokhanisi: there is no code in nova to do that automatic deletion | 09:46 |
sean-k-mooney[m] | gokhanisi: so it sounds like you have somethign else in your cloud that is doing that | 09:47 |
sean-k-mooney[m] | deleting the glance image will have no effect on running vms | 09:47 |
sean-k-mooney[m] | evacuate may fail if the image is deleted and the vm is not on shared sotrage as it wont be able to download the image but reboots and normal move operations like cold/live migrate will work | 09:49 |
*** labedz_ is now known as labedz | 09:54 | |
auniyal_ | Hello #openstack-nova | 10:56 |
auniyal_ | please review these: | 10:57 |
auniyal_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854979 | 10:57 |
auniyal_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854980 | 10:57 |
auniyal_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858673 | 10:57 |
sean-k-mooney | bauzas: care to be the second reviewer on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827467 | 11:43 |
opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: update default overcommit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830829 | 11:51 |
sean-k-mooney | gibi: stephenfin johnthetubaguy ^ care to take a look at that. im hoping we can merge that sooner rather then later | 11:52 |
opendevreview | Kirill proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: GCLOUD2-6989:vnc workable varsion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860555 | 11:55 |
opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Add NovaSoftDeleteObject mixin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854355 | 11:55 |
opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Validate object-DB model field parity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860556 | 11:55 |
opendevreview | Kirill proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: add support of vnc console for ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860557 | 12:00 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix typos in nova docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858673 | 12:09 |
gibi | sean-k-mooney: I'm +2 | 12:14 |
stephenfin | Me too. Low risk since as you note, these are the _initial_ ratios and therefore only affect new resources | 12:19 |
bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I can look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827467 | 12:21 |
bauzas | stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: I don't really want to discuss at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860401 for the moment, as I have the OpenInfra Live session in 2 hours | 12:22 |
bauzas | stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: but if you want, we can discuss this tomorro< | 12:22 |
* bauzas prepares his slides for today | 12:22 | |
*** blarnath is now known as d34dh0r53 | 12:27 | |
sean-k-mooney | bauzas: there is no really rush. so focus on the talk | 13:03 |
sean-k-mooney | anyone else can also reveiw https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827467 by the way i just pinnged you since i tought you might be around | 13:04 |
sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860401 also can wait till the ptg | 13:04 |
sean-k-mooney | or we can chat about it tomrrow or next week | 13:04 |
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 13:31 | |
opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deleted projects from flavor access list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/849131 | 13:43 |
*** iurygregory_ is now known as iurygregory | 14:04 | |
frickler | fyi neutron broke integrated CI, they are working on a fix | 14:41 |
sean-k-mooney | fun | 14:52 |
sean-k-mooney | frickler: by the way were you asking about zuul and devstack recently | 14:54 |
sean-k-mooney | i think we have a bug in our new default policy | 14:54 |
sean-k-mooney | its blocking people with member form callign the server detail api | 14:55 |
frickler | sean-k-mooney: that doesn't ring a bell for me | 14:56 |
sean-k-mooney | it was proably corvus or clarkb | 14:57 |
sean-k-mooney | basically i repodcued it when i redeploy my home cloud and zuul | 14:57 |
sean-k-mooney | im not sure if its a nova issue or zuul one but it breaks | 14:58 |
sean-k-mooney | ill hop on the zuul matrix and follow up later | 14:58 |
lajoskatona | frickler: Hi, could you point to the failure, perhaps also on neutron channel? | 15:06 |
frickler | lajoskatona: ralonsoh is on it, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/860577 should be the fix | 15:07 |
lajoskatona | frickler: thanks | 15:08 |
ralonsoh | I've sent an email right now | 15:08 |
opendevreview | Vladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/nova master: Nova instance snapshot should wait for volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848638 | 15:24 |
dansmith | bauzas: did you see that we're in conflict with the cinder ops hour? | 15:54 |
bauzas | dansmith: if so, they added it after ours | 15:55 |
dansmith | yeah I know | 15:55 |
bauzas | I just took a placeholder | 15:55 |
bauzas | and thanks for the notice, haven't seen it yet | 15:55 |
bauzas | dansmith: at least we'll have one hour for us | 15:56 |
dansmith | bauzas: could we move ours easily? | 15:57 |
bauzas | dansmith: problem is, I already published it in the openinfra live episode today | 15:57 |
dansmith | cinder moving at this point might be difficult, so even though we were first, if we're flexible we probably should be | 15:57 |
dansmith | yeah, that's unfortunate.. did cinder do the same? | 15:57 |
bauzas | no | 15:58 |
dansmith | heh | 15:58 |
bauzas | hence me thinking cinder would be easier to move | 15:58 |
dansmith | whoami-rajat: ^ thoughts? | 15:58 |
bauzas | and that's a 2-hour slot for ops | 15:58 |
bauzas | so, moving the operator slot is actually moving *two* hours for nova | 15:59 |
bauzas | again, I'd prefer cinder to move his slot by one hour | 15:59 |
bauzas | and if they can't, well, as we have 2 hours on that day, that'd be unfortunate but operators wanting to attend both could still be able to discuss with nova for one hour | 16:00 |
dansmith | bauzas: okay so the placeholders were just one hour I think, | 16:00 |
dansmith | so you must have chosen the placeholder and placeholder+1 right? | 16:01 |
bauzas | can't remember sorry how I booked | 16:01 |
bauzas | the eavesdrop logs could tell me tho :) | 16:01 |
bauzas | but yeah, probablyu | 16:01 |
dansmith | well, cinder chose one of the placeholders, so they feel like they did the right thing | 16:01 |
bauzas | so, nova has two slots back-to-back on tues 1-3 | 16:01 |
dansmith | but maybe it's less of a problem because we only have an hour overlap for the second hour | 16:02 |
bauzas | cinder has one slot 2-3 | 16:02 |
bauzas | zactly | 16:02 |
dansmith | so it was *nova* that caused the conflict :) | 16:02 |
bauzas | I pledge non-guilty | 16:02 |
bauzas | :D | 16:02 |
dansmith | I judge you guilty regardless :) | 16:03 |
bauzas | I won't say anything by now till I have a lawyer, sir. | 16:03 |
dansmith | does france have protection against self-incrimination? | 16:03 |
bauzas | we have a "non-guilty, always innocent until proven" policy | 16:03 |
dansmith | yeah that's not the same :) | 16:04 |
bauzas | damn you, I'm grabbing the logs :p | 16:04 |
dansmith | bauzas: maybe we should just drop ours down to the first hour then to avoid conflict, since that was the ask from the TC? | 16:04 |
bauzas | also, just noted that there is a conflicting operator placeholder on Monday 1-2pm too | 16:05 |
dansmith | we could have another bonus slot later, which might be better anyway for people not free in that two-hour slot | 16:05 |
bauzas | frankly, I don't know how the placeholders were provided | 16:05 |
dansmith | I don't see a conflict on monday | 16:05 |
bauzas | did I say Monday ? | 16:06 |
bauzas | shit. | 16:06 |
bauzas | speaking of Tuesday | 16:06 |
dansmith | that should be our slot | 16:07 |
dansmith | perhaps we didn't remove the slot we took when we moved it to our room? | 16:07 |
dansmith | we should probably do that to avoid another conflict | 16:07 |
dansmith | gmann: can you advise? | 16:07 |
* bauzas looks at https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openinfra-events/ how we ended up in such situation | 16:08 | |
bauzas | but yeah, I guess I took the two slots and haven't deleted the placeholders | 16:09 |
gmann | bauzas: yeah, if we can avoid the conflict with cinder | 16:09 |
bauzas | personally, I'd like to run a 2-hour session | 16:09 |
bauzas | one hour is too stretchy | 16:09 |
dansmith | bauzas: at this point I think we should just claim the first slot that we took at 13UTC, shrink to 1h to avoid the overlap | 16:09 |
gmann | nova has 3 operator-hours | 16:09 |
bauzas | for good reason | 16:09 |
bauzas | a 2-hour session for having time | 16:09 |
bauzas | and another hour for people not being to join on Tues | 16:10 |
bauzas | being able* | 16:10 |
gmann | how about shifting thosw to wed ? | 16:10 |
gmann | 2 hours continuous | 16:10 |
bauzas | gmann: again, I took those dates far in advance and I communicated them multiple times | 16:10 |
bauzas | I can move, but honestly I feel bad about it | 16:10 |
dansmith | it's unfortunate but we're just trying to resolve the issue | 16:11 |
gmann | ohk let's wait for whoami-rajat if they can shift their by an hour | 16:11 |
bauzas | and that's unfortunate, but I've just said the slots in https://youtu.be/MSbB3L9_MeY | 16:11 |
gmann | whoami-rajat: I know we talked about it in event channel but is it possible to move operator-cinder-hour at 15 UTC on tuesday ? | 16:12 |
bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-09-06-16.00.html | 16:13 |
bauzas | that's where we agreed on the dates | 16:13 |
bauzas | and that's what I did for booking https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openinfra-events/%23openinfra-events.2022-09-06.log.html | 16:13 |
dansmith | bauzas: at the end of the day we just need to resolve the conflict | 16:14 |
gmann | sure, let's wait for whoami-rajat reply. it is ~10 PM for him so may be tomorrow morning. | 16:14 |
bauzas | I freed two slots we had reserved | 16:14 |
bauzas | dansmith: yeah, but I'm trying to understand how I ended up in such mes | 16:14 |
bauzas | mess | 16:14 |
bauzas | dansmith: I'm looking for alternatively moving the operator session by Thursday | 16:14 |
gmann | I think we planned for single slot of a hour and nova booking for 2 hours end up having conflict | 16:15 |
gmann | but 2 hours slot is not bad with the reason bauzas mentioned | 16:16 |
bauzas | OK, I think I got it | 16:16 |
bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openinfra-events/%23openinfra-events.2022-09-08.log.html | 16:16 |
gmann | may be next time we can have some 2 hours slot as placeholder too so that we can avoid this | 16:16 |
bauzas | I haven't really converted the operator placeholders, I just reused some slots I booked | 16:16 |
bauzas | and then, whoami-rajat just took the placeholder for cinder | 16:17 |
bauzas | hence the problem | 16:17 |
gmann | yeah | 16:17 |
bauzas | I should have unbooked the placeholder before | 16:17 |
gmann | it was worst when openstack-ops slot was booked at same time too but now it is shifted on Thursday 14 UTC | 16:18 |
gmann | bauzas: ^^ please check to avoid conflict to openstack-ops sessions too while rescheduling | 16:19 |
gmann | which is Thursday 14 UTC | 16:19 |
bauzas | ok, then this is impossible to move neither on Wed nor Thursday | 16:21 |
bauzas | we have the ironic operator slot on Wed | 16:21 |
bauzas | and on Thursday, we have the general operator-ops | 16:21 |
bauzas | frankly, this is hard to find another slot | 16:21 |
dansmith | so easiest is to just shrink to the first hour of our current slot right? | 16:21 |
bauzas | Friday isn't possible too, neutron operator hours are there | 16:22 |
bauzas | dansmith: or leave two others and let operators jump to cinder room if they want | 16:22 |
bauzas | two hours* damn. | 16:22 |
dansmith | bauzas: I think we should probably be more fair to the operators and cinder and not do that | 16:22 |
gmann | how about Tuesday 15-17 UTC ? | 16:22 |
gmann | i know they are not placeholder but that can avoid conflict | 16:23 |
dansmith | bauzas: it will be easy for an operator to just stay in our room instead of jumping, or be waiting over an hour for their topic and end up skipping the cinder thing | 16:23 |
bauzas | gmann: can we wait for whoami-rajat's feedback ? | 16:23 |
bauzas | we have two options AFAICS | 16:23 |
bauzas | 1/ nova moves the two hours to 15-17 | 16:23 |
bauzas | 2/ cinder moves by hour to 15-16 | 16:24 |
dansmith | bauzas: you don't think that following the original guideline of choosing one of the available one hour slots is a reasonable solution? come on now :) | 16:25 |
dansmith | doing that also lets the start time of each event not change for anyone who has already recorded it, or mentioned it on youtube :) | 16:26 |
bauzas | dansmith: technically, I took two slots, but I forgot to unbook the placeholders :/ | 16:27 |
dansmith | bauzas: which was not part of the plan right? | 16:27 |
bauzas | you know what ? I give up. | 16:28 |
bauzas | I'll move one of the 2 slots by one hour | 16:28 |
gmann | or w can keep Tuesday 1 hour and wed 2 hour slot ? | 16:28 |
bauzas | wfy ? | 16:28 |
gmann | i mean keeping starting time on Tuesday same as it is announced | 16:29 |
bauzas | gmann: I need to check availability on Wed | 16:29 |
bauzas | sec | 16:29 |
dansmith | extending the weds slot to two hours would be good yeah | 16:29 |
dansmith | keeps the same number of total hours, avoids the conflict | 16:29 |
bauzas | this is not possible | 16:29 |
bauzas | horizon has its operator hour at that time | 16:30 |
bauzas | Wed 3-4 | 16:30 |
dansmith | extend the weds slot, don't move it earlier | 16:30 |
dansmith | also, a conflict with horizon is a lot better than cinder, IMHO | 16:30 |
bauzas | dansmith: there are no slots after 5pm | 16:30 |
bauzas | so we can continue on Wed | 16:31 |
bauzas | you know what ? I'll split the Tues session in two | 16:31 |
bauzas | and that's it | 16:31 |
bauzas | done. | 16:33 |
bauzas | https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html | 16:33 |
bauzas | and if whoami-rajat wants to shift by one hour, I'm cool | 16:34 |
bauzas | if not, fair enough. | 16:34 |
dansmith | thanks! | 16:35 |
gmann | bauzas: sure, thanks! | 16:35 |
atmark | does a rebuild retain instance id? | 16:43 |
dansmith | yes | 16:46 |
atmark | dansmith: thx | 16:48 |
whoami-rajat | bauzas, gmann hi, it seems feasible for us to move the slot since our requirement is to do it early in the week, will need to inform cinder team and update etherpads with new timing but that should not be an issue | 18:04 |
gmann | whoami-rajat: thanks. that will be helpful and bauzas can revert nova slot to previous time | 18:05 |
whoami-rajat | gmann, ack, so i will need to unbook the 1400 UTC slot and book the 1500 one? | 18:05 |
gmann | whoami-rajat: yeah that also work. 14 UTC can be taken by nova . bauzas ? | 18:06 |
bauzas | whoami-rajat: thanks a lot if so, I very appreciate this | 18:17 |
whoami-rajat | :) | 18:18 |
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 18:22 | |
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 20:49 | |
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 22:15 | |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Handle "no RAM info was set" migration case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852002 | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!