Wednesday, 2024-03-13

opendevreviewYoungjun Yoo proposed openstack/python-neutronclient master: refectoring: modifying the value passed as a parameter  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-neutronclient/+/91268501:34
opendevreviewYoungjun Yoo proposed openstack/python-neutronclient master: refectoring: simplifying if condition expressions  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-neutronclient/+/91268701:42
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron stable/2023.2: Fix TestOVNMechanismDriver ipv6 tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91207204:19
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron stable/2023.1: Fix TestOVNMechanismDriver ipv6 tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91207304:19
opendevreviewFrode Nordahl proposed openstack/neutron master: Add documentation for aa-l3-gw-multihoming  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/89940206:47
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing master: Update master for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing/+/91263507:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Update master for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91264107:32
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron master: [OVN] Add the network type to the ``Logical_Switch`` register  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91234707:38
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas stable/2024.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91263907:50
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas stable/2024.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91264007:50
opendevreviewSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/neutron stable/2023.1: DNM Just test of the tobiko periodic job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91271908:38
opendevreviewMerged openstack/networking-sfc master: Update master for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-sfc/+/91264408:43
*** mklejn__ is now known as mklejn09:05
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: FIX OVN LB Health Monitor checks for IPv6 members  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/91141309:37
opendevreviewzhuyawei proposed openstack/neutron master: Try up port, after port binding.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91272410:05
opendevreviewSebastian Lohff proposed openstack/neutron master: Don't delete already deleted extra router routes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91262910:23
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron master: [OVN] Use the LSP update event to update the LRP  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91234910:44
ralonsohlajoskatona, slaweq hi! Now we have 2024.1 branch in n-lib, I think we can merge this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/91227310:48
zigoneutron-dynamic-routing is trying to load DEVICE_OWNER_LOADBALANCER from neutorn-lib, but that's gone in Caracal. Where to file a bug?10:59
ralonsohzigo, where in the code is that happening?11:01
ralonsohwhen we merged this patch, we search for these constants in https://codesearch.openstack.org11:02
zigoralonsoh: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bxUs3Tcp9l4BXzZlSMkQ/11:02
ralonsohzigo, this is because n-d-r is using an old version of neutron11:04
ralonsohI'll update the requirements file11:05
zigoWell, this needs fixing! :)11:05
zigoIn packages, it's getting the latest neutron-lib for me.11:05
zigoThanks!11:05
zigoralonsoh: With my build log, do you understand where the problem is? Will it be easy to make a patch?11:12
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing master: Bump Neutron to 24.0.0.0b1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing/+/91273711:13
ralonsohzigo, ^11:13
zigoThis will just make it fail in the CI, not repair the issue...11:14
ralonsohwhy is so?11:14
zigoAlso, the problem is since neutron-lib was released, no?11:14
ralonsohyes because it removed the lbaas constants11:15
zigoie: builds with 3.8.0, fails with 3.11.0.11:15
ralonsohI don't understand what does it mean11:15
zigoRunning neutron-dynamic-routing unit tests with neutron-lib 3.8.0 works, but not with 3.11.0. So I fail how changing the version of neutron will do any good.11:17
ralonsohI think I explained it in the commit message and the LP bug11:17
zigoOh ok, I understand now, sorry and thanks for explaining ! :)11:18
zigoWill add the constraint in my package, it will pull neutron from experimental and it will fix for me as well.11:18
ralonsohcool11:18
zigoralonsoh: Will neutron RC1 be released soon?11:18
ralonsohlet me check the release calendar11:20
zigoThis week is RC1 release week ! :)11:20
ralonsohthis week11:20
zigoIt's just nicer if it's not released last minute of Friday ... :P11:20
ralonsohhttps://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html11:20
zigonetworking-sfc still is using assertDictContainsSubset (gone from Python 3.12). I have a Debian patch for it, but I also don't know where to file a bug for it.11:30
ralonsohzigo, in Neutron board11:31
ralonsohhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/11:31
zigoOh, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-sfc/+/906523 ...11:31
zigoIMO, this one needs review + merge for the release.11:31
ralonsohdone11:32
zigo:)11:32
zigoThanks ! :)11:32
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron master: [FT] Group "functional.agent.l3" tests in the same executor  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91164711:38
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron master: Open the 2024.2 (Dalmatian) DB branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91276111:42
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron master: Add "socket" NUMA affinity policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/91059411:45
opendevreviewMerged openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: Update master for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/+/91264712:12
fricklerralonsoh: zigo: fyi, networking-sfc was already branched yesterday, so you'll need to backport12:29
ralonsohsure12:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/networking-sfc master: python 3.12: assertDictContainsSubset  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-sfc/+/90652313:02
zigofrickler: I imported the patch in debian/patches (replacing my patch that was huge...), so that's fine.13:46
opendevreviewMerged openstack/networking-bagpipe master: Remove the "new_facade" parameter that is no longer needed  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bagpipe/+/90522214:15
fungihaleyb: (any anyone else interested) just a heads up that i've proposed and backported a bunch of centos-7 removal changes for vpnaas under https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22drop-centos-7%22 but for expediency i intend to just go ahead and bypass review/gating to merge them directly in gerrit so we can proceed with identifying further cleanup in advance of friday when that node15:34
fungilabel goes away15:34
fungididn't want it to surprise anyone15:34
haleybfungi: thanks for the heads up, sgtm15:39
fungiyeah, if we had a longer lead time, and if jobs were actually passing on all those stable and unmaintained branches, we could go through a more typical review process15:40
lajoskatonafungi: thanks, so am I right that no review is necessary?15:40
fungilajoskatona: a quick double-check would be appreciated just for an extra set of eyeballs15:40
fungithey should really be very trivial deletions from .zuul.yaml and nothing else15:41
lajoskatonafungi: ack15:41
otherwiseguyhaleyb: do you know anyone in the oslo-core world I can press for reviews on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/911627? 15:42
otherwiseguyshould be pretty safe taking something random that is clearly wrong and adding a sane order to it. :p15:43
otherwiseguy(to fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/911625) essentially, neutron with ml2/ovn doesn exit on sigterm.15:44
otherwiseguy(and stomps on signal handlers that would be set elsewhere in neutron and oslo.service)15:45
haleybotherwiseguy: i don't know anyone per se, would just look in other changes. is there a bug for that?15:45
haleyblike takashi and stephen15:45
otherwiseguystephen is on PTO until Mar 19. And I somehow missed that tkajinam was in this channel. :)15:46
haleybrelated to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2056366 ?15:46
otherwiseguyhaleyb: yeah.15:47
haleybralonsoh: so are you going to need some more changes in 2024.1? just seeing your comment in one change about getting it merged this week?15:50
tkajinamotherwiseguy, I've been pulled by some release problems, sorry. I'll check it but we already passed requirement freeze deadline (which happend in the week of Feb 26) and I'm not too sure if we can/should have it for 2024.1 at this timing15:50
tkajinamand good to know that Stephen is on PTO now... though I may have to bother him to get his knowledge about sqlalchemy stuffs...15:51
tkajinamotherwiseguy, while I give some thoghts on it, probably we need a bug (probably you add oslo.service to that neutron bug ?) so that we raise exception or get it backported after 2024.1 release15:52
otherwiseguytkajinam: thanks, understood. Hopefully it is something we can get backported eventually. They only project I saw currently using it was cinder, but neutron *not* using it is a bug in itself. We overwrite oslo's (and our own) signal handlers.15:53
otherwiseguy@tkajinam: I'll create a new oslo bug as well. Thanks.15:53
ralonsohhaleyb, I think you have already discussed LP#205636616:01
ralonsohI hope it could be backportable (the oslo patch)16:01
ralonsohand about other patches... I don't know really16:01
ralonsohI was expecting the ovn agent patches to be merged16:01
ralonsohand https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2052821%2216:02
ralonsohhaleyb, but I think it is too late for this now16:02
ralonsohhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/89823816:03
ralonsoh5 months there a very little reviews... what a pity16:03
ralonsohvery few*16:03
haleybralonsoh: sorry, i should have looked again last week after you updated, but i didn't see a FFE for it16:08
haleyband regarding the other bug, it's only marked medium so i didn't know the impact16:09
ralonsohhttps://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2052821%22 is "kind of" a feature, but identifies as a bug16:09
ralonsohand the ovn agent metadata extension does not interfere in the current code16:10
ralonsohbut having it in a slurp release, could have been better to start the ovn metadata agent deprecation16:10
ralonsohI'16:10
ralonsohsorry16:10
ralonsohI'll postpone that16:10
ralonsohactually I need to push a 2024.2 spec for that, to start the ovn metadata agent deprecation16:10
fungilajoskatona: even if you just wanted to give https://review.opendev.org/912662 a quick once-over that's probably sufficient. the rest are all direct cherry-picks of that. most applied directly, a couple i had to make very minor adjustment to because of nearby churn in the file, but i've already double-checked them too16:13
haleybralonsoh: understood. we do have 24 hours if we want to merge the ovn-agent metadata extension16:18
ralonsohhaleyb, that could be awesome16:18
ralonsohas commented, this is not touching anything that currently runs in any deployment16:18
ralonsohis just adding the ovn agent extension16:18
ralonsohthat will help us to deprecate the older agent16:18
lajoskatonahaleyb, ralonsoh, ykarel: perhaps you can also vote on the patch from fungi to remove centos jobs from vpnaas: https://review.opendev.org/912662, thanks in advance16:19
ralonsohlet me check16:19
ralonsoh+216:19
haleybralonsoh: will probably need slaweq to look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/898238 as well :) and i will -1 the release patch for now16:20
fungiwell, really just giving folks an opportunity to make sure i didn't have a serious typo or something. if we don't merge these, those branches will all have zuul config errors starting day after tomorrow16:20
ralonsohhaleyb, thanks a lot16:20
fungithanks!16:20
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266216:22
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas stable/2024.1: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266316:22
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas stable/2023.2: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266416:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas stable/2023.1: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266516:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas stable/zed: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266616:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas unmaintained/yoga: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266716:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas unmaintained/xena: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266816:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas unmaintained/wallaby: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91266916:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas unmaintained/victoria: Zuul: Remove references to centos-7 job nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/91267016:23
haleybslaweq: don't know if you're still around but can you take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/898238 ? trying to get that in this cycle17:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!