Monday, 2013-11-11

*** gdubreui has joined #openstack-neutron00:02
*** networkstatic has quit IRC00:05
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron01:02
*** networkstatic has joined #openstack-neutron01:43
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron01:49
*** scotty916 has quit IRC01:52
openstackgerritSalvatore Orlando proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Include lswitch id in NSX plugin port mappings  https://review.openstack.org/5457801:53
openstackgerritSalvatore Orlando proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Add DB mappings with NSX logical switches  https://review.openstack.org/5457901:53
openstackgerritSalvatore Orlando proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Add DB mappings with NSX logical routers  https://review.openstack.org/5458401:53
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron01:54
scotty916#openstack01:56
*** ljjjustin has joined #openstack-neutron02:07
*** scotty916 has quit IRC02:12
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron02:13
*** scotty916 has quit IRC02:22
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron02:24
*** scotty916 has quit IRC02:27
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron02:28
*** Alssi has joined #openstack-neutron02:35
openstackgerritYohei Matsuhashi proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: Enable to select specific network service_type  https://review.openstack.org/5453402:36
*** scotty916 has quit IRC02:37
*** ljjjustin has quit IRC02:49
*** ljjjustin has joined #openstack-neutron03:01
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-neutron03:06
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:19
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron03:19
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:24
*** dims has quit IRC03:25
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron03:31
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-neutron03:56
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:57
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron03:57
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: ExtraRoute: fix _get_extra_routes_by_router_id()  https://review.openstack.org/5553204:01
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC04:02
*** ian_ott has joined #openstack-neutron04:12
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-neutron04:17
*** ljjjustin has quit IRC04:40
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-neutron04:45
*** jecarey has quit IRC04:47
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron04:55
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron05:01
*** scotty916 has quit IRC05:12
*** marun has joined #openstack-neutron05:17
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron05:24
*** scotty916 has quit IRC05:31
*** wenjianhn has joined #openstack-neutron05:45
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC05:56
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron05:59
*** scotty916 has joined #openstack-neutron05:59
*** scotty916 has quit IRC06:03
*** ktbenton_ has quit IRC06:05
*** ktbenton_ has joined #openstack-neutron06:07
*** ljjjustin has joined #openstack-neutron06:10
openstackgerritZhongyue Luo proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Use DictOpt for mapping options  https://review.openstack.org/4599006:29
openstackgerritZhongyue Luo proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Use DictOpt for mapping options  https://review.openstack.org/4599006:30
openstackgerritJenkins proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/5468006:35
*** amritanshu_RnD has joined #openstack-neutron06:47
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC06:56
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron06:57
*** gdubreui has quit IRC06:57
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC06:57
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron06:57
*** bvandenh_ has quit IRC07:02
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC07:08
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron07:09
*** matsuhas_ has joined #openstack-neutron07:12
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC07:12
openstackgerritJoe Mills proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Midonet to support port association at floating IP creation  https://review.openstack.org/5579207:15
openstackgerritli,chen proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Remove the warning for Scheduling Network  https://review.openstack.org/5579307:20
openstackgerritli,chen proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Remove the warning for Scheduling Network  https://review.openstack.org/5579307:26
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: Don't shadow str  https://review.openstack.org/5574007:26
*** matsuhas_ has quit IRC07:32
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron07:32
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-neutron07:36
*** LiJiansheng has joined #openstack-neutron08:22
*** amuller has joined #openstack-neutron08:23
*** lijunwu has joined #openstack-neutron08:28
lijunwuping LiJiansheng08:28
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC08:29
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron08:30
*** marun has quit IRC08:31
*** marun has joined #openstack-neutron08:32
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC08:34
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron08:37
*** jpich has joined #openstack-neutron08:41
openstackgerritberlin proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Fix adding router_id return attribute when CRU firewall and vip obj  https://review.openstack.org/4856808:52
*** hua has quit IRC09:06
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-neutron09:11
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-neutron09:19
*** networkstatic is now known as networkstatic_zZ09:26
openstackgerritMonty Taylor proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Replace stubout with fixtures  https://review.openstack.org/5580509:32
openstackgerritArata Notsu proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Do not run "ovs-ofctl add-flow" with an invalid in_port  https://review.openstack.org/5363609:44
*** lijunwu has quit IRC09:46
*** gdubreui has joined #openstack-neutron09:59
*** gdubreui has quit IRC10:05
*** gdubreui has joined #openstack-neutron10:05
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-neutron10:06
*** gongysh has quit IRC10:11
*** rossella_s has quit IRC10:37
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-neutron10:37
*** ljjjustin has quit IRC10:40
*** ppenjoy has joined #openstack-neutron10:47
*** ppenjoy has left #openstack-neutron10:47
*** LiJiansheng has quit IRC10:57
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC11:14
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron11:14
*** gdubreui has quit IRC11:15
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC11:15
*** matsuhas_ has joined #openstack-neutron11:15
*** LiJiansheng has joined #openstack-neutron11:19
*** matsuhas_ has quit IRC11:25
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron11:26
openstackgerritArata Notsu proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Do not run "ovs-ofctl add-flow" with an invalid in_port  https://review.openstack.org/5363611:26
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-neutron11:27
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC11:30
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron11:31
openstackgerritArata Notsu proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Remove confusing comment and code for LBaaS  https://review.openstack.org/5582211:44
*** amritanshu_RnD has quit IRC11:50
*** amritanshu_RnD has joined #openstack-neutron11:51
*** coolsvap has quit IRC11:57
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-neutron12:07
openstackgerritAssaf Muller proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: [fwaas] Can now create disabled firewall rules  https://review.openstack.org/5582612:13
*** ramishra has quit IRC12:24
openstackgerritAkihiro Motoki proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Replace mox in unit tests with mock  https://review.openstack.org/5404412:31
openstackgerritYohei Matsuhashi proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: Enable to select specific network service type  https://review.openstack.org/5453412:34
*** amrit_ has joined #openstack-neutron12:47
*** LiJiansheng has quit IRC12:54
EmilienMsalv-orlando: ping12:57
salv-orlandohi EmilienM - how are you?12:57
EmilienMsalv-orlando: fine, thx! you ?12:57
salv-orlandoFine as anybody could be fine on a monday...12:57
EmilienM:)12:57
EmilienMsalv-orlando: i was about starting some work on tempest, what about negative tests for test_routers ?12:58
EmilienMwant to start something simple first12:58
salv-orlandoYeah, that would be good. We're also lacking coverage on tests for floating ups, that would be a next step12:59
EmilienMsalv-orlando: ok. Let me create blueprints and start work on it12:59
salv-orlandoAsk somebody in openstack-qa if you need to create blueprints or bugs for this13:00
EmilienMsalv-orlando: ack13:00
salv-orlandoand if you can tag everything as 'neutron', that would make easier for us to find them in tempest13:00
EmilienMmake sense13:00
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC13:01
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron13:02
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC13:04
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron13:04
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: Simplify using external routers and metadata  https://review.openstack.org/5029213:06
EmilienMsalv-orlando: <mkoderer> EmilienM: but negative test are currently under discussion in tempest13:06
EmilienMsalv-orlando: <mkoderer> EmilienM: so I wouldn't spent so much effort in it13:07
EmilienMuh?13:07
*** ppenjoy has joined #openstack-neutron13:07
salv-orlandooh well, tempest is another project where people have plenty of opinions, just like neutron ;)13:07
EmilienMsalv-orlando: sure13:08
salv-orlandoI do not recall this specific discussion, must be relatively new13:08
EmilienMsalv-orlando: i don't mind, let's improve test coverage anyway13:08
sdaguesalv-orlando: yeh, this is new, we got flooded with negative tests during RC, so we were trying to cut back and come up with a generative approach instead13:08
sdaguehowever, in the neutron case I think we can make an exception13:09
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC13:09
salv-orlandosdague: I think there are so little negative tests for neutron that some can help a lot while we get to a point where they can be generated13:09
sdagueyep, agreed13:10
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-neutron13:10
sdagueI'm going to suggest that13:10
salv-orlandook thanks a lot13:10
*** x86brandon has quit IRC13:17
*** ppenjoy has left #openstack-neutron13:22
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron13:57
*** dims has joined #openstack-neutron13:59
rossella_ssalv-orlando EmilienM I am looking into tempest too. I could take care of the tests for floating ips, what do you think?14:00
openstackgerritEvgeny Fedoruk proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Adding more tests and fixes driver as a result  https://review.openstack.org/5415514:00
EmilienMrossella_s: i started with that finally14:01
EmilienMrossella_s: a first shoot : https://review.openstack.org/5584614:01
EmilienMbut it's a WIP, i'll amend with more tests14:01
rossella_sEmilienM: got it14:02
EmilienMrossella_s: maybe you could go ahead with routers stuffs14:03
rossella_sEmilienM: ok, I'll have a look at that then. I have to get started, it will take some time :)14:03
EmilienMrossella_s: a discussion is going to happen on thursday (qa meeting) about negative testing in neutron, we should follow that14:05
rossella_sEmilienM: thanks for the hint14:06
salv-orlandorossella_s, EmilienM: I reckon neutron will get an exception on negative tests, given sdague's words. However for floating IPs I have a suspect that even the 'positive' tests do not provide enough coverage, so that's something that Rossella could tackle.14:07
*** julim has joined #openstack-neutron14:08
*** x86brandon has joined #openstack-neutron14:08
EmilienMsalv-orlando: ok, let's try to break the api then :)14:09
rossella_ssalv-orlando: thanks, I will take it then14:09
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC14:13
*** aymenfrikha has joined #openstack-neutron14:21
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC14:22
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-neutron14:23
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron14:25
*** larsks has joined #openstack-neutron14:30
*** mestery has quit IRC14:31
*** mestery has joined #openstack-neutron14:31
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-neutron14:41
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-neutron14:47
*** amritanshu_RnD has quit IRC14:58
*** amrit_ has quit IRC14:58
*** armax has joined #openstack-neutron15:02
*** networkstatic_zZ has quit IRC15:02
*** networkstatic has joined #openstack-neutron15:03
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC15:06
*** gongysh has quit IRC15:08
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-neutron15:09
*** nplanel has joined #openstack-neutron15:10
openstackgerritJenkins proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/5442515:13
*** amuller has quit IRC15:14
openstackgerritAmir Sadoughi proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Added check on plugin.supported_extension_aliases  https://review.openstack.org/4743215:19
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC15:23
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-neutron15:23
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC15:28
*** jlibosva has quit IRC15:37
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-neutron15:41
*** aymenfrikha has quit IRC15:44
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron15:47
*** ppenjoy has joined #openstack-neutron15:59
*** ppenjoy has left #openstack-neutron16:00
*** aymenfrikha has joined #openstack-neutron16:02
*** opilotte has joined #openstack-neutron16:03
*** afazekas has quit IRC16:15
*** aymenfrikha has quit IRC16:23
*** djoreilly has joined #openstack-neutron16:25
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-neutron16:25
doudemestery: ping16:29
*** aymenfrikha has joined #openstack-neutron16:30
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-neutron16:41
*** zackf has joined #openstack-neutron16:42
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: Remove confusing comment and code for LBaaS  https://review.openstack.org/5582216:54
*** manishg has quit IRC16:58
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-neutron17:01
*** marun has quit IRC17:07
*** aymenfrikha has quit IRC17:11
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC17:33
*** jpich has quit IRC17:34
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-neutron17:37
mesterydoude: pong17:42
*** rossella_s has quit IRC17:44
jog0https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/125016817:45
jog0the bug above is a regression that is blocking us from gating on the neutron-large-ops test17:48
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron17:50
*** manishg has joined #openstack-neutron18:13
*** dsockwell has quit IRC18:17
*** mlavalle has quit IRC18:18
*** briancline has quit IRC18:23
*** Shixiong has joined #openstack-neutron18:27
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC18:32
openstackgerritJoe Gordon proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Cleanup HACKING.rst  https://review.openstack.org/5588518:34
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-neutron18:35
openstackgerritJenkins proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/5442518:48
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-neutron18:55
*** Shixiong has quit IRC19:08
*** dsockwell has joined #openstack-neutron19:23
openstackgerritJoe Gordon proposed a change to openstack/python-neutronclient: Make HACKING.rst DRYer  https://review.openstack.org/5590419:29
*** briancline has joined #openstack-neutron19:39
*** chandankumar has quit IRC19:46
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC19:53
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC20:03
*** djoreilly has quit IRC20:11
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron20:30
*** davlaps has joined #openstack-neutron20:33
*** davlaps is now known as help20:34
*** help is now known as devlaps20:34
*** devlaps has quit IRC20:36
*** davlaps has joined #openstack-neutron20:37
*** davlaps has quit IRC20:40
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC20:42
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron20:45
openstackgerritAnita Kuno proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Revert "sync log from oslo"  https://review.openstack.org/5591320:52
anteayaEmilienM salv-orlando thanks for addressing tempest, let me know if you encounter any obstacles so I can help21:00
salv-orlandothanks anteaya21:03
anteayaand thank you, rossella_s21:03
anteayahopefully the reversion of the sync log from oslo patch can get large-ops passing again21:03
anteayathen we can take another shot at that functionality21:04
*** x86brandon has quit IRC21:06
salv-orlandoanteaya: do you have a quick gerrit link to this revert patch?21:07
anteayahttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/55913/121:08
anteayaI have no idea why or how a change to logging would have large ops failing21:09
anteayabut large-ops started failing October 31st: http://graphite.openstack.org/graphlot/?from=-2weeks&until=-1week&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.check.job.gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-large-ops.SUCCESS&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.check.job.gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-large-ops.FAILURE21:09
salv-orlandoanteaya: indeed - this is why I asked to see the revert patch!21:09
anteayaand there were only 2 patches merged to neutron that day, this patch and one that was a comment to a file21:09
anteayagreat21:10
anteayaI am interested in hearing your thoughts21:10
anteayaI'm wrong, I didn't scroll down far enough21:12
anteayathe other patch might be a candiate as well: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron/commit/?id=c1577c5954ce4103f81708b4a92569e7ab34af8d21:12
anteayaI can offer a patch to revert this one as well21:13
anteayanot as well, but instead21:14
*** julim has quit IRC21:14
salv-orlandoanteaya: I now see I reviewed the original commit for the log sync - I don't see how that could trigger a non-deterministic failure if not for some weird interactions deriving from replacing cstringIO with six.moves21:14
salv-orlandothe multi-worker patch is definitely looking more dodgy.21:15
salv-orlandoI kept it under stress test for a few days before approving, but I might have missed something - very likely.21:15
anteayaokay, will submit a patch for that and let's see what comes back from the tests21:15
anteayapossibly21:15
anteayalet's try the revert and go from there21:16
salv-orlandosounds reasonable. I know several folks want to use the multi-worker feature, but if we prove that breaks large ops we need to revert and repush when it's safe.21:16
*** julim has joined #openstack-neutron21:16
jog0anteaya: its not the oslo patch21:17
anteayajog0: okay21:17
jog0if you look at the first jenkkins comment https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54666/21:17
jog0large-ops passed21:17
jog0also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/37131/ passed to21:20
jog0but we only have one datapoint on that :/21:20
salv-orlandojog0: If I had to choose a culprit based on the nature of the change only, I would pick 3713121:21
jog0salv-orlando: agreed21:21
salv-orlandojog0: however, to counter this very same argument, the change introduced by 37131 is not enabled in the gate. This just to create even more confusion, if possible.21:22
jog0    Merge "Avoid dhcp agent race condition on subnet and network delete"21:23
jog0    Fix query error on dhcp release port for postgresql21:23
jog0are two more candidates21:23
jog0anteaya: ^21:23
openstackgerritAnita Kuno proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Revert "Creates multiple worker processes for API server"  https://review.openstack.org/5591721:23
jog0(commit message titles from git log)21:24
jog0salv-orlando: from the commit msgs those both looks possible on the surface21:24
salv-orlandojog021:25
salv-orlando:21:25
salv-orlandosorry… I think those two change also introduced other failures in the gate. Some of them have already taken care of, some others are under review. Not sure if they will fix large-ops as well21:26
* salv-orlando looking for relevant patches under review21:26
salv-orlandohttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/54850/21:26
anteayaso far 54850 has only had Armando Jenkins and smokestack working on it21:28
anteayawho else might be able to review that one?21:28
anteayait doesn't always have to be you salv-orlando21:29
jog0salv-orlando: can we just revert the original two patches21:29
salv-orlandojog0: not sure whether it's a good idea to just revert anything that could have possibly caused the error. Especially since I don't know if anybody (at least I haven't) has thoroughly looked at the logs in order to nail down the issue.21:30
salv-orlandoanteaya: I promised Armando a review, but we still need another core. I am sure markmcclain will step in too.21:31
jog0salv-orlando: true, I just figured we can leaverge openstack-infra to see which one is the troublemaker in this case21:31
salv-orlandoI will vote for the "revert everything" approach if we're unable to do a conclusive post-mortem. And even in that case, I would prefer to revert candidate patches one at a time.21:32
anteayasalv-orlando: great thanks21:32
jog0I am not saying merge the reverts just propose em21:32
salv-orlandojog0: we can leverage openstack-infra to the extent that mtaylor and team do not bark at us for overusing resources!21:32
mordredsalv-orlando: resources we have21:32
anteayaso let's leverage away21:33
jog0mordred: \o/21:33
salv-orlandomordred: gah I cannot use that excuse anymore21:33
anteayano excuses left21:33
anteayawe must produce stable results21:33
jog0anteaya: well we have a stable result, the test does fail consistently ;)21:33
anteayawell there is that21:34
anteayagoal: stability on Monday, achieved21:34
*** sgran has quit IRC21:34
jog0anteaya: I almost forgot if yuo go to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54752/21:34
jog0you can just click on the revert change button21:34
jog0and that creates a new patch21:34
anteayalook at that revert change button, how sweet21:35
salv-orlandojog0: I would not revert 5475221:35
anteayathat will save me a few minutes21:35
anteayaI would like to see what 55917 comes back with first21:35
salv-orlandoif you revert 54572 postgres jobs will fail most of the times.21:35
anteayacreating a revert patch harms nothing21:36
anteayayou don't have to merge it21:36
anteayabut we can get the logs on the reversion21:36
jog0either way, just wanted to point out that button21:36
anteayabutton acknowledged21:36
anteayamy gratitude21:36
salv-orlandono worries. I will take a look at devstack patches merged in the same timeframe. Changes in default neutron configuration might have uncovered some bug which was always in the source code.21:37
jog0salv-orlando: ohh good idea21:37
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-neutron21:39
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC21:40
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-neutron21:40
anteayaI am heading out for a walk, back in a while21:42
*** networkstatic has quit IRC22:02
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:12
*** jlibosva has quit IRC22:12
*** pcm_ has quit IRC22:16
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/neutron: DHCP agent scheduler support for BigSwitch plugin  https://review.openstack.org/5448522:19
*** yamahata has quit IRC22:37
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-neutron22:39
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-neutron22:41
anteayaback22:42
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC22:42
anteayaso this failed to get large-ops passing: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55917/22:46
anteayajog0: it failed on a timeout issue waiting for a uuid (image) to finish building and return an active status22:47
anteayais that the consistent finding for the large-ops failures?22:47
salv-orlandothat's always the pattern anteaya. There also no nova-side or devstack-side change related in any way.22:49
salv-orlandoI am scavenging the logs - basically I am looking for a situation in which allocate_for_instance in the nova driver does not complete, possibly because of a deadlock in neutron22:50
jog0anteaya: that is consistent22:50
*** yamahata has quit IRC22:55
jog0while we are digging into neutron bugs:22:56
*** mlavalle has quit IRC22:56
jog0https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/123548622:57
jog0https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/123963722:57
jog0are two of the most common gate failing jobs22:57
anteayaokay, thanks22:57
anteayamore splunking to do22:58
anteayahey jog0 you may have missed this, but I am cobbling together a code sprint for Neutron Tempest in the 2nd week of January in Montreal22:58
anteayawould be awesome if you could attend22:59
anteaya3 days sometime that week, I need to source venue and production help22:59
anteayaokay both bugs are assigned and report status in progress23:00
anteayasalv-orlando: are armando and robert kukura in channel do you know?23:01
jog0I will be in Australia I think http://linux.conf.au/23:02
salv-orlandoarmando is armax - but I think he's in a meeting now. Bob is rkukura, he's on EST so perhaps he's not in office now23:02
anteayaso will I, jog0, it takes place the week after Australia23:02
salv-orlandojog0: anteaya scheduled the thing keeping linuxcon in mind. This is not a good excuse as well :)23:02
armax I'm here23:02
anteayaokay I am EST time too, it is 6pm23:02
anteayahello armax23:02
anteayawe were talking a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/123963723:03
anteayahow is that going?23:03
anteaya*taking23:03
jog0anteaya: both bugs say they are in progress but I don't see any outstanding patches to fix em23:03
anteayasalv-orlando: now you are singing my song, no excuses23:04
jog0anteaya: ahh your one step ahead of me, count me in in that case23:04
anteayagrand thanks23:04
armaxyeah23:04
armaxlaunchpad bug reports are kinda messed up23:04
armaxthe issues are covered by these two patches:23:04
armaxhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/46563/23:04
armaxhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/54850/23:04
armaxhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/55000/23:05
anteayawe were talking about 54850 earlier23:05
armaxk23:05
armaxwanna fill me in?23:05
anteayasalv-orlando said he would review and get markmclain to as well23:06
anteayasure23:06
anteayaas you know, neutron tests are failing23:06
anteayathey are affecting other projects23:06
anteayaas of the summit, I am helping to address that situation23:06
anteayaI am on the infra team23:06
anteayaso I am currently doing some evaluation23:06
anteayaas well as meeting people23:07
anteayamy technical knowledge is not as deep as some peoples23:07
anteayabut I am a good conversation starter23:07
armaxok23:07
armaxif you look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55000/23:07
anteayadoes that help to give a sense?23:07
armaxthis is stacked up on top of fix for 5485023:07
armaxthe gate jobs have been pretty stable23:08
armaxand the other failures that I have seen are related to bug  #123297123:09
anteayawhen you say the gate jobs have been pretty stable, what do you mean?23:09
anteayaand what are you basing that assessment on?23:09
salv-orlandoarmax: they're explicitly looking at largeops23:09
salv-orlandoit has be voting soon23:09
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC23:09
armaxI haven't looked at the largeops at all23:09
armaxat the time I looked at it it was non-voting23:09
salv-orlandoyeah. So that's the deal.23:09
armaxbefore adding fuel to the fire23:10
armaxI'd rather see the check-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron, check-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-pg, check-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-isolated and check-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-pg-isolated23:10
armaxstable first23:10
jog0armax: large ops passed two weeks ago23:10
armaxic23:11
jog0and was stable23:11
jog0it does 'nova boot --num-instances=150'23:11
jog0rather the logical equivalent and thats it23:11
anteayaarmax: I agree, they all need to be stable23:12
armaxI'd need to look into the large-ops one to understand what's going on23:12
anteayaif you want to advocate for those tests being stable I will support you in that23:12
anteayaand find others to work on large-ops23:12
armaxwhat I noticed when I worked on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55000/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54850/23:12
armaxis that large-ops failed consistently23:12
anteayayes23:13
armaxwhile the isolated ones and the pg ones were being successful23:13
anteayahas since October 31st23:13
armaxso I figured there was some other failure mode going on23:13
armaxI can have a look into that23:13
armaxbut not until later today23:13
armaxI need to dash now23:13
jog0armax:  see above for what largeops does23:13
anteayathat would be great if you are willing23:13
anteayaand thanks23:13
armaxthat said23:13
armaxgetting fixes for 55000 and 54850 in23:14
armaxwould be great23:14
armaxor at least get some feedback23:14
armaxbtw large-ops is still non-voting right?23:15
anteayawell salv-orlando just approved 5500023:15
armaxyeah23:15
anteayaso we should see something soon23:15
jog0armax: we are trying to get it to be voting23:15
armaxbut that depends on 5485023:15
armaxgotcha23:15
anteayaand yes large-ops is currently non-voting23:15
anteayaah okay so 54850 first, then reverify on 5500023:15
armaxyeah23:16
anteayajog0: do you feel able to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54850/23:16
anteayacan't hurt23:16
armaxtaking into account that there is still bug #1232971 lurking around23:16
anteayaI'm reading the review comments now23:17
anteayaarmax: we have to do the best we can in this direction23:17
armaxso even though two nasty ones will be addressed reviews won't be succeeding at 100% rate at least until that one gets addressed23:17
anteayawe will fall and then stand up again23:17
anteayafair enough23:17
anteayalet's start by increasing the success percentage from what it is23:18
armaxanyhow, I'll look into the large-ops asap23:18
anteayathank you,23:18
anteayaI am grateful23:18
armaxis there any bug report already being filed or more information I can rely on?23:18
armaxsure thing23:18
anteayaalso hope you can attend the sprint in Montreal in the 2nd week of January23:18
armaxnot likely ;)23:18
armaxunless there a irc channel associated with it23:18
anteayaarmax: you know what I know at present, but if I learn more I will update the appropriate bug report or file a new one23:18
jog0anteaya: unfortunately I don't think I am. I am  not very familer with the code base23:19
anteayano, we have to do in person23:19
anteayajog0: understood23:19
anteayaI am going to give it a whirl for syntax and grammar just to get in the groove23:19
anteayanot much of a contribution but better than standing here pointing fingers23:19
anteayaarmax: where are you based?23:20
anteayaarmax: here is the bug jog0 filed on large-ops: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/125016823:21
openstackgerritIvar Lazzaro proposed a change to openstack/neutron: Embrane LBaaS Driver  https://review.openstack.org/5423623:28
armaxI am based in Palo Alto, CA23:33
armaxanteya: thanks for report 1250168 I'll look into it23:34
anteayaarmax: thanks. The bug is assigned to me because I attempted to address it by reverting two different patches23:37
anteayaI don't think I have found the correct patches/approach though23:38
anteayaif you have a better fix, the bug is all yours23:38
*** armax has left #openstack-neutron23:38
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-neutron23:54
salv-orlandoarmax: fit the large ops job uses the fake driver. I did not know that, but it makes sense as it launches 150 vms23:59
salv-orlandofit -> fyi23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!