| *** elninja44 has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 01:36 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhaojingjing proposed openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: ‘local_pref’ can be updated in 'test_bgpvpn_create_update_delete()' https://review.openstack.org/537720 | 02:06 |
|---|---|---|
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
| *** vthapar has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 05:00 | |
| *** elninja44 has quit IRC | 05:12 | |
| *** vthapar has quit IRC | 05:17 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 06:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhaojingjing proposed openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: ‘vni’ should not be updated for policy in bgpvpn.conf https://review.openstack.org/537755 | 06:18 |
| *** tmorin has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 07:49 | |
| doude | tmorin merging https://review.openstack.org/#/c/520021/12 :) | 08:50 |
| tmorin | yep :) | 08:51 |
| tmorin | hopefully, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536604 could merge as well before the door closes! | 08:51 |
| doude | cross fingers | 08:51 |
| tmorin | by the way, this test now passes, and would be ready to merge: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534809/ | 08:52 |
| doude | yes I'm trying it actually | 08:52 |
| doude | tmorin about that scenario, just to understand, the router is there to bring connectivity between net1 ports and net2 ports? We could replace it | 09:01 |
| doude | by assocaiting the net2 to the bgpvpn? | 09:01 |
| tmorin | no no, the router is just here to allow the box running the tempest test to access VM1 on net1 via a floating IP | 09:05 |
| tmorin | doude: ^ | 09:05 |
| doude | ok but also for the net1 private IPs to reach net2 private IPs | 09:05 |
| doude | tmorin | 09:06 |
| tmorin | doude: let me check, I thought that only net1 is connected to the router | 09:06 |
| doude | no both | 09:06 |
| tmorin | ok, sorry | 09:08 |
| doude | I think in net1 we have 2 routes: 192.168.0.0/24 via 10.102.21.20 pref 200 and 192.168.0.0/24 via 10.102.21.40 pref 100 | 09:09 |
| tmorin | in this test all VMs need to be reached via a floating IP, because the test needs to access them via SSH to setup loopback IPS | 09:09 |
| tmorin | BUT... | 09:09 |
| tmorin | ... it's not via a single router | 09:09 |
| doude | yes I forget that | 09:09 |
| doude | but without that we can imagine replacing router by assocating the bgpvpn to the net2 ? | 09:09 |
| tmorin | which router ? | 09:10 |
| tmorin | the router for net1 or the router for net2 | 09:10 |
| doude | routing between the 2 VN | 09:10 |
| tmorin | the routers setup in this test do not create connectivity between net1 and net2 private IPs | 09:11 |
| doude | so hw server1 reach server 2 or 3 ? | 09:11 |
| tmorin | they only create connectivity between one network and external routing via floating IPs | 09:11 |
| tmorin | via the BGPVPN | 09:12 |
| tmorin | BGPVPN-net assoc(net A) | 09:12 |
| doude | ok we don't need to add bgpvpn association to the vn2, port association is enought? | 09:12 |
| tmorin | BGPVPN-port assoc( port in net B) | 09:12 |
| tmorin | no need to create a network association, port association alone is enough | 09:13 |
| doude | we could imagine, to prouve the power of bgpvpn, divide the router in 2 router one per net just for external connectivity and show server 1 can readh server 2 and 3 in bckup | 09:13 |
| doude | we could imagine to prouved the power of bgpvpn, dividing router in 2 routers, one per net just for external connectivity and showing server 1 can reach server 2 and 3 in backup | 09:14 |
| doude | (btw in Contrail you can set a FIP on fixed IP wothou a router) | 09:15 |
| doude | (btw in Contrail you can set a FIP on fixed IP without a router) | 09:15 |
| *** bfernando has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 09:19 | |
| tmorin | doude: what you suggest, unless I missed something, is what the test does | 09:19 |
| doude | no I don't suggest to change the test, the test is good | 09:20 |
| tmorin | doude: _create_fip_router returns a different router each time | 09:20 |
| tmorin | we already have two routers, and connectivity between server 1 and server2/server3 is done only via BGPVPN | 09:21 |
| doude | ha ok I though that was the same router | 09:21 |
| doude | so nice | 09:22 |
| tmorin | :) | 09:25 |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Morin proposed openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: enable tempest RT udpate test https://review.openstack.org/537816 | 09:45 |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Morin proposed openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: bagpipe: advertise support for VNI extension https://review.openstack.org/537885 | 12:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Morin proposed openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: bagpipe: advertise support for VNI extension https://review.openstack.org/537885 | 13:07 |
| *** matrohon has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 15:53 | |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Morin proposed openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: Local_pref attr tempest test for port association https://review.openstack.org/534809 | 16:24 |
| *** matrohon has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
| *** tmorin has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| *** bfernando has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
| *** matrohon has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 20:52 | |
| *** matrohon has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: Local_pref attr tempest test for port association https://review.openstack.org/534809 | 22:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!