Wednesday, 2018-05-16

*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral00:06
*** linhnm has joined #openstack-mistral00:33
*** bobh has quit IRC00:41
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral00:41
*** bobh has quit IRC00:46
*** toure is now known as toure|gone01:01
*** linhnm has quit IRC02:03
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-mistral02:36
*** gkadam has quit IRC03:07
rakhmerovd0ugal: ok, I'll make a note04:34
rakhmerovapetrich, d0ugal: hi, need your help with understanding why devstack gates are failing in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568566/04:35
rakhmerovapetrich: you added the "force" argument but it's available only in master04:35
rakhmerovfor some reason the tempest tests are running with this flag against stable/queens of mistral04:36
rakhmerovas far as I understand04:36
*** jaosorior has quit IRC04:40
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-mistral04:47
rakhmerovyes, this is right: http://logs.openstack.org/66/568566/1/check/mistral-devstack/eddff55/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-05-15_18_50_00_46323704:47
*** jaosorior has quit IRC04:54
rakhmerovoops, we don't even have stable branches for this repo :)05:01
rakhmerovd0ugal: so d0ugal, I guess the only way for now is to backport changes related to "force" parameter05:02
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-mistral05:02
*** hardikjasani has joined #openstack-mistral05:04
openstackgerritRenat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral stable/queens: Only allow for deleting completed executions  https://review.openstack.org/56874905:12
openstackgerritRenat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral stable/queens: Use "passive_deletes=True" in ORM relationships  https://review.openstack.org/56856605:15
openstackgerritRenat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral stable/queens: Improve Mistral API DB error handling  https://review.openstack.org/56875205:27
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-mistral05:36
openstackgerritRenat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral stable/queens: Only allow for deleting completed executions  https://review.openstack.org/56874905:39
openstackgerritRenat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral stable/queens: Use "passive_deletes=True" in ORM relationships  https://review.openstack.org/56856605:39
*** livelace has joined #openstack-mistral06:26
openstackgerritLingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral master: Support Qinling actions in Mistral  https://review.openstack.org/56797406:32
*** apetrich has quit IRC06:38
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-mistral06:50
openstackgerritRenat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral master: Release note for using "passive_deletes=True"  https://review.openstack.org/56876206:59
rakhmerovapetrich, d0ugal: ok, I had to backport one more patch to make it pass but I think we have a general issue with tempest tests. We probably need to have stable branch management for them too07:14
apetrichrakhmerov, ouch07:15
rakhmerov:)07:15
apetrichrakhmerov, so it is running master tempest against queens?07:15
apetrichis that it?07:16
rakhmerovyes07:16
apetrichthat sounds good #not07:16
rakhmerovin mistral-tempest-plugin repo we simply don't have stable/queens branch :)07:16
apetrichI see. yeah we need a stable branch07:17
apetrichbe back in a bit07:17
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-mistral07:42
apetrichrakhmerov, do you know how we create a branch?07:51
rakhmerovnow we can request to create a stable branch when we send a release patch07:53
rakhmerovso it's done by release management team07:54
rakhmerovmay be I'm wrong but I think we'll be able to make a stable branch only when releasing the next major version (Rocky)07:54
apetrichmeh. that means backporting the force patch07:55
d0ugalI am not sure how I feel about that.07:56
apetrichI know that I don't feel ultrahappy about that07:56
d0ugalThe thing is, it makes sense to run master tempest against queens07:56
d0ugaltempest should be version independant07:56
d0ugalthe problem is that our tempest is wrong07:56
d0ugalat least, that is my understanding of how tempest should be used07:57
d0ugalit should be written in such a way that it can handle the different versions - enabling and disabling tests depending on what is available07:57
apetrichfor the force issue we could revert the last tempest patch and let the try catch in place07:57
apetrichthat means not backporting the force07:58
d0ugalI think that makes more sense than backporting and releasing a feature :)07:58
apetrichI'm +1 on that. rakhmerov what do you think?07:58
d0ugalWe should do that, then try and get some advice on how we should do this correctly.07:58
apetrichthe bad thing is that it includes the stestr fix :( but that does not affect tempest somehow07:59
*** shardy has joined #openstack-mistral08:00
openstackgerritMerged openstack/mistral master: Release note for using "passive_deletes=True"  https://review.openstack.org/56876208:00
openstackgerritAdriano Petrich proposed openstack/mistral-tempest-plugin master: Revert "Fix todo that is not needed anymore stestr conf"  https://review.openstack.org/56877708:00
apetrichI will do the stestr on its onw. as it should have been done in the first place08:01
d0ugalapetrich: What is the stestr fix?08:01
d0ugaloh, the conf file?08:01
apetrichbesides being dead wrong08:01
apetrichit allows for tox to work when testing in a suitable env08:01
apetrichotherwise I had to do a lot of bodges to make it wun08:02
apetrichrun08:02
rakhmerovd0ugal, apetrich: here08:03
rakhmerovnot sure what you want to revert?08:04
rakhmerovd0ugal: your words about being version agnostic make sense, yes..08:04
rakhmerovbtw, the needed patch to mistral is on its way to stable/queens08:05
rakhmerovand soon will be merged08:05
rakhmerovsorry, I had to make a decision quickly because we need my latest passive deletes patch in stable/queens today08:06
apetrichrakhmerov, to get the force patch on I did a try except the call with force and after it went in I removed that. removing that makes the force option required for all versions.08:06
rakhmerovso you're talking about reverting only the patch to mistral-tempest-plugin?08:06
apetrichaye08:07
rakhmerovok08:07
apetrich https://review.openstack.org/56877708:07
rakhmerovbut do we need it now given that I've already backported the corresponding patch to 'mistral'?08:07
rakhmerovnow it's going to be fine08:07
rakhmerovI know it was kind of bad that it happened but now it's already fixed08:08
rakhmerovIMO, all is fixed now, we just need to keep in mind that tempest tests should be version agnostic08:08
rakhmerovand be careful about such changes in future08:08
rakhmerovd0ugal: what do you think?08:08
rakhmerovon the other hand, yes, we can revert it..08:09
rakhmerovseemingly, no harm in that too08:09
apetrichrakhmerov, he just message me he will be right back. I think he might be having internet issues08:09
rakhmerovok08:10
rakhmerovnp08:10
d0ugalrakhmerov: Which needed patch will soon be merged?08:20
d0ugalWhat has been backported?08:20
rakhmerovhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/568749/08:21
rakhmerovthat adds the "force" flag08:21
d0ugalapetrich: actually, I got a delivery which would have been quick ... but I managed to smash some glass :/08:21
apetrichouch08:21
rakhmerovthe problem was that in the tempest repo we use this flag (which is not so good, I understand because it's incompatible)08:22
d0ugalYeah, we made a mistake with the tempest patch.08:22
rakhmerovbut I didn't realise in time that the problem was in the tempest repo, not in mistral08:22
rakhmerovso I quickly backported the mistral patch08:22
rakhmerovyeah, kind of08:22
rakhmerovI'm just saying that may be we don't need to revert anything now?08:22
d0ugalWhich mistral patch?08:22
rakhmerovhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/568749/08:23
rakhmerov:)08:23
rakhmerovthat adds the "force" flag08:23
d0ugalrakhmerov: we shouldn't do that08:23
rakhmerovwhy?08:23
rakhmerovbecause it's a feature?08:23
d0ugalYes08:23
d0ugaland because it wasn't discussed :/08:23
rakhmerovI know, my apologies for that. I was in a rush08:24
rakhmerovand that seemed to be the right solution to me08:24
rakhmerovdespite it's slightly against the stable branch policy08:24
d0ugalit is also a backwards incompatible feature08:25
d0ugalI am going to block it, sorry.08:25
rakhmerovit's not incompatible08:25
rakhmerovwhy?08:26
rakhmerovthis is an addition of a parameter08:26
*** livelace has quit IRC08:26
d0ugalBecause users can't delete running executions anymore08:26
rakhmerovaaah...08:26
rakhmerovok08:26
rakhmerovthen let's revert two patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568749/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/q/35d94fd6093edfb80283d43e819bcba7c75bedbf08:27
rakhmerovwould that be right?08:27
rakhmerovthe second one is already being reverted08:27
rakhmerovd0ugal: ^08:27
d0ugalI think we only need to revert the revert08:27
d0ugalThis one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568777/08:27
d0ugalapetrich: Is that correct?08:27
d0ugalrakhmerov: there was a workaround for the tempest tests that was reverted after - I think we still need it08:28
d0ugalso we either need to add it again or revert the revert :)08:28
rakhmerovd0ugal: no08:28
rakhmerovtests will be failing08:28
apetrichd0ugal, aye08:28
rakhmerovthat's what I'm saying to you08:29
rakhmerovthat was the reason I backported that mistral patch08:29
d0ugalrakhmerov: I understand that.08:29
rakhmerovso we need to block my backport (you just did) and approve the revert made by apetrich08:30
rakhmerovright?08:30
apetrichif we revert this  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568777/ tests should pass on queens and master08:30
d0ugalRight08:30
apetrichright08:30
rakhmerovok08:30
apetrichapprove the revert I mean08:30
apetrichthat is bad language sorry08:30
d0ugalno, I was being confusing too08:31
d0ugalToo much rushing for this time of day.08:31
rakhmerovthen I'll need to rebase https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568566/ which was the reason of the whole thing08:31
d0ugalSounds good.08:31
d0ugalThanks!08:31
rakhmerovd0ugal: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568749/ has almost gone through the "gate" queue but you just blocked it08:32
rakhmerovwhat's going to happen with it?08:32
rakhmerovis it still gonna be merged?08:32
rakhmerovor not08:32
*** mcdoker1818 has quit IRC08:32
d0ugalrakhmerov: I hope not :) I guess we will find out soon.08:37
rakhmerovif it's merged, we'll revert it anyway08:37
d0ugalrakhmerov: I abandoned the patch. I think that might kill the CI job.08:37
rakhmerovno worries08:37
d0ugalok08:37
d0ugalrakhmerov: I don't see it in the gate queue now. So I guess abandoning is a quick way to stop it08:39
rakhmerovyes08:39
rakhmerovthanks08:39
openstackgerritRenat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral stable/queens: Use "passive_deletes=True" in ORM relationships  https://review.openstack.org/56856608:40
rakhmerovd0ugal: please look if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568566/ is ok to backport08:40
rakhmerovit's already a backport actually08:40
d0ugallol08:40
d0ugalYes, that is fine08:40
rakhmerovthanks08:43
openstackgerritKupai József proposed openstack/mistral master: A mechanism to close stuck running action executions  https://review.openstack.org/52708508:44
d0ugalrakhmerov: btw, we have some unreleased backports in pike and queens.08:45
d0ugalI'll do the pike release now, after this patch lands I'll release queens08:45
rakhmerovyes, I know08:45
rakhmerovthanks08:45
d0ugalor are there any other backports coming soon?08:45
rakhmerovfor us it just wasn't so important08:45
rakhmerovnope, that's all we need for now08:45
d0ugalapetrich: did your mistralclient release merge?08:46
apetrichaye08:46
d0ugalcool08:46
d0ugaloh yeah, I found it :)08:46
apetrichhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/568530/08:47
apetrichtoo late. sorry08:47
d0ugalnp08:47
openstackgerritDougal Matthews proposed openstack/mistral master: Support Qinling actions in Mistral  https://review.openstack.org/56797408:51
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-mistral08:53
*** jistr has quit IRC09:09
*** jistr has joined #openstack-mistral09:12
openstackgerritDougal Matthews proposed openstack/mistral master: Added test to update the database schema to the latest revision  https://review.openstack.org/56814009:25
openstackgerritLingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral master: Support Qinling actions in Mistral  https://review.openstack.org/56797409:28
openstackgerritDougal Matthews proposed openstack/mistral master: Add .stestr.conf configuration  https://review.openstack.org/56747409:33
openstackgerritMerged openstack/mistral-tempest-plugin master: Revert "Fix todo that is not needed anymore stestr conf"  https://review.openstack.org/56877709:36
rakhmerovd0ugal: I think we can close https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/175796611:11
openstackLaunchpad bug 1757966 in Mistral "Mistral server consumes more memory over time" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Renat Akhmerov (rakhmerov)11:11
rakhmerovwe fixed what we've found so far11:11
rakhmerovd0ugal: ok with you?11:13
openstackgerritMerged openstack/mistral master: Use partial loading of workflow execution in the controller  https://review.openstack.org/56855611:21
openstackgerritMerged openstack/mistral master: Purge README.rst in favor of the generated documentation  https://review.openstack.org/56556211:21
*** jaosorior has quit IRC11:23
openstackgerritKupai József proposed openstack/mistral master: A mechanism to close stuck running action executions  https://review.openstack.org/52708511:35
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-mistral11:42
*** gkadam has quit IRC11:43
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-mistral11:43
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-mistralclient master: Add namespace parameter to workflow-get and workflow-get-definition  https://review.openstack.org/56679211:54
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-mistralclient master: Adding environment-get-definition for easy environment-update  https://review.openstack.org/56646911:54
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-mistral12:11
*** shardy has quit IRC12:13
d0ugalrakhmerov: sure, sounds good!12:26
*** toure|gone is now known as toure13:01
*** shardy_ is now known as shardy13:38
openstackgerritKupai József proposed openstack/mistral master: A mechanism to close stuck running action executions  https://review.openstack.org/52708513:51
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral14:12
*** hardikjasani has quit IRC14:32
*** Alexey_Abashkin has joined #openstack-mistral14:44
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC14:46
*** Alexey_Abashkin is now known as AlexeyAbashkin14:46
rakhmerovd0ugal: ok, closed it15:23
d0ugalrakhmerov: Thanks15:23
rakhmerovd0ugal: btw, I don't see rocky-1 milestone in LP for some reason15:23
rakhmerovwas it removed?15:23
d0ugalrakhmerov: I think that is because it is closed?15:23
d0ugalIt shouldn't be removed...15:23
rakhmerovnope, I see others that are closed as well15:23
d0ugalhmm, weird15:24
d0ugalhttps://launchpad.net/mistral/+milestone/rocky-115:24
d0ugalrakhmerov: ^ I still see it there.15:24
rakhmerovyeah, weird15:24
rakhmerovok, np15:24
d0ugalI guess I done something wrong... I'll take a look15:24
rakhmerovd0ugal: I noticed that a release wasn't created for it15:25
rakhmerovif you open it you'll see active "Create release" link15:26
d0ugaloh15:26
rakhmerovyeah15:26
d0ugalI didn't even know launchpad had such a thing15:26
rakhmerov:)15:26
rakhmerovnow you know )15:27
openstackgerritMerged openstack/mistral stable/queens: Use "passive_deletes=True" in ORM relationships  https://review.openstack.org/56856615:28
d0ugalFinally ^15:29
*** gkadam has quit IRC16:46
*** shardy has quit IRC16:50
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC17:16
openstackgerritMatthew Thode proposed openstack/mistral master: uncap networkx  https://review.openstack.org/56891117:36
*** bobh has quit IRC18:04
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral18:05
openstackgerritMatthew Thode proposed openstack/mistral master: uncap networkx  https://review.openstack.org/56891118:56
*** livelace has joined #openstack-mistral19:12
*** d0ugal_ has joined #openstack-mistral21:40
*** d0ugal has quit IRC21:41
*** livelace has quit IRC21:52
*** weshay has quit IRC22:17
*** weshay has joined #openstack-mistral22:22
*** weshay has quit IRC22:26
*** bobh has quit IRC22:27
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral22:28
*** bobh has quit IRC22:32
*** weshay has joined #openstack-mistral22:34
*** d0ugal__ has joined #openstack-mistral22:40
*** d0ugal_ has quit IRC22:41
*** weshay has quit IRC23:17
*** weshay has joined #openstack-mistral23:21
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!