| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:36 | |
| *** enykeev has quit IRC | 00:40 | |
| *** enykeev has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:41 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:43 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:56 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:22 | |
| *** zhenguo has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:23 | |
| *** harlowja has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
| *** harlowja_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:38 | |
| xylan_kong | Ravikiran_K: hi, are you sure your token info is correct? | 02:13 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Fixing wf execution creation at initial stage https://review.openstack.org/239638 | 03:08 |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Do not use len() in log_exec decorator https://review.openstack.org/243690 | 03:59 |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 04:18 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 04:23 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 05:54 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 06:34 | |
| LimorStotland | Hi all. | 06:40 |
| LimorStotland | can any one pleas review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242996/ Thanks | 06:41 |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 06:45 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has quit IRC | 06:45 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has joined #openstack-mistral | 06:49 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 06:49 | |
| *** tshtilma has joined #openstack-mistral | 07:15 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-mistral | 07:17 | |
| tshtilma | hi , need another +2 for the bug fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240705/ | 07:22 |
| tshtilma | please review | 07:22 |
| ^Gal^ | got you covered with the +2 thing | 07:29 |
| ^Gal^ | (just kidding) | 07:33 |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 07:35 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 07:39 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 07:40 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 07:51 | |
| *** LiatFried has joined #openstack-mistral | 07:54 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 07:57 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 08:36 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:39 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gal Margalit proposed openstack/mistral-dashboard: UI: Task & Execution screen refactored https://review.openstack.org/243665 | 08:46 |
| *** ^Gal^ has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:46 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 08:57 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 09:13 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 09:17 | |
| *** zhenguo has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
| *** LiatFried has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral: Add db model for resource sharing https://review.openstack.org/244030 | 10:00 |
| rakhmerov | melisha, nmakhotkin, akuznetsova: hi guys, give me 2 mins and we'll start our bug review | 10:01 |
| LimorStotland | Hi all, is there a bug meeting now? | 10:01 |
| nkoffman | Hi | 10:01 |
| nmakhotkin | hi everyone | 10:01 |
| *** [1]melisha has joined #openstack-mistral | 10:01 | |
| *** nastya has joined #openstack-mistral | 10:01 | |
| nastya | hi there | 10:02 |
| [1]melisha | nastya: Hi | 10:03 |
| ^Gal^ | hello | 10:03 |
| rakhmerov | hi again | 10:04 |
| rakhmerov | my mac crashed unexpectedly ) Got scared of the bug meeting probably | 10:04 |
| nastya | are we ready to start meeting? | 10:04 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 10:05 |
| [1]melisha | :-) | 10:05 |
| rakhmerov | let me just forward a letter from Moshe that he sent me yesterday | 10:05 |
| rakhmerov | it has a list of bugs important for ALU | 10:05 |
| rakhmerov | done | 10:07 |
| rakhmerov | you all should have it now | 10:07 |
| [1]melisha | rakhmerov: Thanks. | 10:07 |
| nkoffman | got it, thx :) | 10:08 |
| rakhmerov | so before we start actually discussing bugs we need decide how we track bugs that need to be backported into stable/liberty | 10:08 |
| rakhmerov | is there a standard way of doing this you'd be aware of? | 10:08 |
| rakhmerov | I just thought we could create a wiki page for that, not sure we can do it well in Launchpad | 10:09 |
| nastya | @rakhmerov: yes | 10:09 |
| [1]melisha | rakhmerov: I am not aware of any process. WIKI is fine by me. Maybe a tag in launchpad? | 10:09 |
| rakhmerov | woow, melisha, great idea | 10:09 |
| rakhmerov | let's try tags first | 10:10 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 10:10 |
| nastya | need to create tag : liberty-backport-potential | 10:10 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 10:10 |
| rakhmerov | why potential? | 10:10 |
| nastya | other project did it in this way | 10:10 |
| rakhmerov | ooh, ok | 10:10 |
| [1]melisha | all: Just to put a context to our discussion. We have some customers that will use Mistral Liberty in production on live deployments in the next few months | 10:11 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 10:11 |
| [1]melisha | Our customers are very demanding in regard to stability and performance | 10:11 |
| [1]melisha | We see it in our current live deployments and the tickets they open on Heat | 10:12 |
| rakhmerov | trying to create a tag and for some reason I can't do it | 10:12 |
| rakhmerov | give me a sec | 10:12 |
| *** LiatFried has joined #openstack-mistral | 10:12 | |
| [1]melisha | They have huge huge stacks (>2500 nested stacks in one top level stack) and they are constantly working with the OpenStack APIs for querying and modifying | 10:13 |
| rakhmerov | ok, done | 10:13 |
| [1]melisha | We are still backporting important fixes into Kilo for them from time to time | 10:13 |
| rakhmerov | > 2500 staks?????! | 10:13 |
| rakhmerov | that sounds scary | 10:14 |
| [1]melisha | Yes. Crazy things. and we expect similar behaviors in Mistral :-) | 10:14 |
| *** nastya_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 10:14 | |
| rakhmerov | yeah, ok | 10:14 |
| rakhmerov | So I created a new tag: liberty-backport-potential | 10:14 |
| rakhmerov | let's use it | 10:14 |
| *** nastya_ has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| rakhmerov | so let's quickly go over the list of bugs | 10:14 |
| rakhmerov | in the email | 10:15 |
| rakhmerov | 1. Mistral stops responding after a few days that we haven't investigated / opened yet | 10:15 |
| *** nastya_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 10:15 | |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: any comments on that? What exactly stops responding? | 10:15 |
| rakhmerov | btw, let's try to use regular meeting commands, they are supposed to work now | 10:16 |
| [1]melisha | rakhmerov: Not much to do here yet. mistral-api is not responding to any request. The logs are not being written into | 10:16 |
| rakhmerov | #startmeeting Mistral Bug Review | 10:16 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Nov 11 10:16:18 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rakhmerov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 10:16 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 10:16 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'mistral_bug_review' | 10:16 |
| rakhmerov | 1. Mistral stops responding after a few days that we haven't investigated / opened yet | 10:16 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 10:16 |
| *** nastya has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| rakhmerov | then let's at least file a bug | 10:17 |
| [1]melisha | We need to investigate further. | 10:17 |
| rakhmerov | #action melisha: File a bug for "Mistral stops responding after a few days that we haven't investigated / opened yet" | 10:17 |
| [1]melisha | Cool | 10:17 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 10:17 |
| rakhmerov | 2. task stuck in RUNNING state when all action executions are finished - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1513456 | 10:17 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1513456 in Mistral "task stuck in RUNNING state when all action executions are finished" [Critical,Triaged] | 10:17 |
| rakhmerov | On this one, we came across it a number of times | 10:18 |
| nkoffman | we get this a lot, specifically when ruuning in HA mode, we see that all action-executions were sucessfull but the task doesn't en | 10:18 |
| nkoffman | end | 10:18 |
| nmakhotkin | yes, I investigated that a little bit | 10:19 |
| rakhmerov | have you done any investigation? Any assumption where the problem is? | 10:19 |
| nastya_ | we also got it | 10:19 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 10:19 |
| nmakhotkin | the potential problem is our transactions | 10:19 |
| rakhmerov | I assume that the issue is in transactions | 10:20 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 10:20 |
| rakhmerov | Winson also observed this behavior but in a different context | 10:20 |
| rakhmerov | nkoffman: do you know a reliable way of reproducing it? | 10:20 |
| rakhmerov | or at least increasing conditions that increase chances or reproducing it | 10:21 |
| nkoffman | I saw it using a workflow with a task using with_items on HA, | 10:21 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 10:21 |
| nkoffman | I can try to reproduce on our node, haven't seen it on devstack though | 10:21 |
| rakhmerov | please try to fill all info you have in bugs' comments | 10:21 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 10:21 |
| nkoffman | ok | 10:21 |
| nastya_ | nkoffman: I saw it in devsatck installation without any ha | 10:21 |
| rakhmerov | I can try to dig this task myself since I have a couple of thoughts how to track it down | 10:22 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 10:22 |
| nkoffman | nastya_: I assume the HA might only bring it up more often | 10:22 |
| rakhmerov | yes, I guess so | 10:23 |
| nastya_ | nkoffman: yeah, agree | 10:23 |
| rakhmerov | ok, I assigned it to myself | 10:23 |
| rakhmerov | will try to fix it | 10:23 |
| rakhmerov | soon | 10:23 |
| rakhmerov | let's continue | 10:23 |
| rakhmerov | 2. Running WFs fail on failed to find system actions / workflows if DB sync is running in parallel - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1508379 | 10:24 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1508379 in Mistral "Running WFs fail on failed to find system actions / workflows if DB sync is running in parallel" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Tomer Shtilman (tomer-shtilman) | 10:24 |
| nastya_ | rakhmerov: you can use my env to debug where this problem was occured | 10:24 |
| rakhmerov | ooh, sorry, it was #3 | 10:24 |
| rakhmerov | nastya_: ok, will talk to you once I get to working on it, thanks | 10:24 |
| nmakhotkin | this one is being fixed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240705/ | 10:25 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha, LimorStotland, nkoffman: so this happens if you need to reinstall one of Mistral instances? | 10:25 |
| [1]melisha | rakhmerov: We all know the reason for this and Tomer is working on a fix with very responsive reviews from you all so that's OK | 10:26 |
| nmakhotkin | but I'm not sure on 100% | 10:26 |
| rakhmerov | nmakhotkin: yes, this seems to be the right patch | 10:26 |
| [1]melisha | rakhmerov: On production setups, there is a puppet agent that always makes sure that the VM is up-to-date | 10:27 |
| rakhmerov | #action: rakhmerov, nmakhotkin: review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240705/ | 10:27 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: ok | 10:27 |
| [1]melisha | This puppet agent runs every X minutes and compares conf files, etc. and also runs mistral syn db | 10:27 |
| rakhmerov | I see | 10:27 |
| rakhmerov | I'm just wondering.. Maybe we should change the whole algorithm of updating actions in DB | 10:28 |
| rakhmerov | w/o deleting them | 10:28 |
| rakhmerov | but on the other hand, if we use transactions properly it should fix the problem | 10:28 |
| rakhmerov | ok, let's move on | 10:28 |
| [1]melisha | It will fix the problem | 10:28 |
| rakhmerov | 4. Workflow executed more than once when using cron-trigger with multiple engines - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1513548 | 10:29 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1513548 in Mistral "Workflow executed more than once when using cron-trigger with multiple engines" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Moshe Elisha (melisha) | 10:29 |
| rakhmerov | this is being worked on | 10:29 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: I still owe you a review, sorry | 10:29 |
| [1]melisha | Yes | 10:29 |
| [1]melisha | np | 10:29 |
| rakhmerov | #action: rakhmerov: Review https://review.openstack.org/243234 ASAP | 10:30 |
| rakhmerov | ok, guys, btw, just for the same of time saving I'm not tagging these tickets with the new tag | 10:30 |
| rakhmerov | I'll do it once we finish the meeting | 10:31 |
| rakhmerov | .. for the sake ... | 10:31 |
| rakhmerov | the next one | 10:31 |
| rakhmerov | 5. Some DB queries are reported slow as no indices are used - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1505664 | 10:31 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1505664 in Mistral "Some DB queries are reported slow as no indices are used" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Winson Chan (winson-c-chan) | 10:31 |
| rakhmerov | this one is assigned to Winson | 10:31 |
| rakhmerov | I'll help him fix that, it's pretty straightforward thing to do | 10:32 |
| [1]melisha | Cool. Do you have an easy way to know the indexes that are needed? | 10:32 |
| rakhmerov | #action rakhmerov: tag all needed bugs with liberty-backport-potential | 10:32 |
| [1]melisha | or the queries that are executed? | 10:32 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: yes, it's mostly in my head ) | 10:33 |
| rakhmerov | If I look at DB model I'll say exactly what should be indexed and what should not | 10:33 |
| [1]melisha | Great | 10:33 |
| rakhmerov | of course, this doesn't cancel the need of some testing | 10:33 |
| [1]melisha | :-) Sure. We will help with that | 10:34 |
| rakhmerov | #action rakhmerov: put info into https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1505664 about what exact indexes need to be created | 10:34 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1505664 in Mistral "Some DB queries are reported slow as no indices are used" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Winson Chan (winson-c-chan) | 10:34 |
| rakhmerov | 6. WF execution is not created if input preparation of initial task fails - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1506470 | 10:35 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1506470 in Mistral "WF execution is not created if input preparation of initial task fails" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to Nikolay Makhotkin (nmakhotkin) | 10:35 |
| rakhmerov | so here my question is: is this a bug at all? | 10:35 |
| rakhmerov | opinions? | 10:36 |
| nmakhotkin | the fix is already commited | 10:36 |
| nmakhotkin | IMO, yes, it is a bug | 10:36 |
| [1]melisha | I think it is a bug. As I see it an execution should always be created | 10:36 |
| nkoffman | I agree | 10:36 |
| LimorStotland | me 2 | 10:36 |
| rakhmerov | already committed? or merged? | 10:37 |
| rakhmerov | can you please help me to find it? | 10:37 |
| nastya_ | merged | 10:37 |
| nmakhotkin | fix commited in LP means that it is merged :) | 10:38 |
| nastya_ | rakhmerov: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239638/ | 10:38 |
| rakhmerov | ok, I can find it via the ticket | 10:38 |
| rakhmerov | yep, thanks | 10:38 |
| rakhmerov | ok, great! | 10:39 |
| rakhmerov | #action rakhmerov: take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239638/ and backport it | 10:39 |
| rakhmerov | 7. HTTP connection issues on simple load testing - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1423054 | 10:40 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1423054 in Mistral mitaka "HTTP connection issues on simple load testing" [High,Triaged] | 10:40 |
| [1]melisha | If the bug description is true - this will surely be an issue for our customers | 10:40 |
| rakhmerov | ok, I'll just share what I know quickly | 10:41 |
| rakhmerov | we discussed it a lot with StackStorm about 8 months ago and particularly with Winson | 10:41 |
| rakhmerov | note that latest comment was made on 2015-02-18 | 10:42 |
| rakhmerov | so, I'm almost sure this is not really a bug if we just consider Mistral codebase | 10:42 |
| _gryf | 1 | 10:43 |
| rakhmerov | Winson told me that once they put Mistral behind Apache server or Nginx this issue stopped appearing completely | 10:43 |
| rakhmerov | the thing is that if we use just an http server provided out of the box it's mostly intended to be used for development, not for production | 10:43 |
| rakhmerov | in other words, it can't really server a lot of parallel requests well and dies under even modest load | 10:44 |
| [1]melisha | OK. I see | 10:44 |
| rakhmerov | Apache or Nginx help exactly with a big number of requests coming in in parallel | 10:44 |
| [1]melisha | so no need to backport | 10:45 |
| rakhmerov | just in case, I'd suggest we talk to Winson again and clarify this information | 10:45 |
| rakhmerov | #action rakhmerov, [1]melisha: talk to Winson about https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1423054 and confirm that this can be solved with putting Apache or Nginx in front of Mistral API server | 10:46 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1423054 in Mistral mitaka "HTTP connection issues on simple load testing" [High,Triaged] | 10:46 |
| rakhmerov | 8. execution-get truncates "State info" - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1509456 | 10:47 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1509456 in Mistral "execution-get truncates "State info"" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to hardik (hardik-parekh047) | 10:47 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: can you confirm this bug too? | 10:48 |
| rakhmerov | or anyone else? | 10:48 |
| rakhmerov | I didn't see it myself | 10:48 |
| nkoffman | we didn | 10:48 |
| nkoffman | 't | 10:48 |
| nkoffman | see it either, but based on the description, it looks like it could be an issue, if it does happen | 10:49 |
| rakhmerov | I'm ready to bet that Mistral server doesn't truncate anything. If the problem exists it might be something on a client side | 10:49 |
| nkoffman | nmakhotkin:I see it is confirmed by | 10:49 |
| rakhmerov | ooh, yes, nmakhotkin confirmed it | 10:50 |
| nmakhotkin | yep, I confirmed that | 10:50 |
| rakhmerov | ok, then it should be something simple to fix | 10:50 |
| nmakhotkin | state_info is really truncated | 10:50 |
| rakhmerov | let's not spend time on that now, we just need to fix it | 10:50 |
| rakhmerov | 9. wait-before and retry policies directly call task_handler.run_existing_task() method via RPC - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1484521 | 10:51 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1484521 in Mistral "wait-before and retry policies directly call task_handler.run_existing_task() method via RPC" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Renat Akhmerov (rakhmerov) | 10:51 |
| rakhmerov | Yes, this is definitely a bug but it's more like an architectural bug | 10:51 |
| nkoffman | what are the consequences of this bug to users? | 10:52 |
| rakhmerov | we've discovered it with Limor together while improving Scheduler | 10:52 |
| rakhmerov | no consequences I'd be able to tell about actually | 10:52 |
| rakhmerov | it's rather an ugly design | 10:52 |
| rakhmerov | and it requires some serious refactoring in engine and policies | 10:53 |
| rakhmerov | not sure we need to backport it actually | 10:53 |
| LimorStotland | yes, we have a bp on improving Scheduler:https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/fallback-mechanism-for-scheduler | 10:53 |
| nkoffman | ok, so in that case, probably unnecessary to backport | 10:53 |
| rakhmerov | yes, I think we need to make a design improvement for Mitaka | 10:54 |
| rakhmerov | it'll require I think a couple of weeks for me to fix it properly | 10:54 |
| nkoffman | ok | 10:54 |
| LimorStotland | I think if it doesn't have any effect on the user and its risky we shouldn't backport | 10:54 |
| rakhmerov | I assigned to myself to M-2 for now | 10:55 |
| rakhmerov | yes, it is risky a little bit because, as I said, it's not just a simple change, it's rather a refactoring | 10:55 |
| rakhmerov | of engine and policies | 10:55 |
| rakhmerov | which I'd love to do personally but it's pretty time consuming | 10:56 |
| rakhmerov | 10. Wrong execution state with conditional transitions - https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1510936 | 10:56 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1510936 in Mistral "Wrong execution state with conditional transitions" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to Nikolay Makhotkin (nmakhotkin) | 10:56 |
| nmakhotkin | this one is fixed already | 10:57 |
| rakhmerov | ok, cool | 10:57 |
| nkoffman | we haven't tried to reproduce it on our set up yet, but again based on description, we will need the fix | 10:57 |
| rakhmerov | needs to be backported I think | 10:57 |
| nmakhotkin | one thing, this bug is not completely fixed (case of on-complete is uncovered) | 10:58 |
| rakhmerov | yes, it was definitely a bug, we discussed it with Nikolay before | 10:58 |
| nkoffman | ok, so we need to backport it | 10:58 |
| rakhmerov | #action nmakhotkin: fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1510936 completely and backport all related patches | 10:58 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1510936 in Mistral "Wrong execution state with conditional transitions" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to Nikolay Makhotkin (nmakhotkin) | 10:58 |
| rakhmerov | :) | 10:58 |
| rakhmerov | 11. create pagination for the mistral client (This should be treated like a bug) - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-mistralclient/+spec/pagination-execution-mitralclient (This is mandatory as after a few days of work there is no way to get the execution list anymore). | 10:59 |
| LimorStotland | i am missing one more +2 : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242996/ | 11:00 |
| rakhmerov | #action rakhmerov: review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242996/ and backport it into stable/liberty | 11:01 |
| rakhmerov | no questions on that, this is really a bad thing | 11:01 |
| LimorStotland | and then i think we need to backported it because users with croon-trigers can use execution-list without it | 11:01 |
| rakhmerov | I wish we could spend more time polishing such things | 11:01 |
| rakhmerov | LimorStotland: sure, agree on 100% | 11:01 |
| LimorStotland | cool :-) | 11:02 |
| rakhmerov | 12. Add ceilometer apis as mistral actions - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ceilometer-actions (This is not mandatory but we have some use cases that require this). | 11:02 |
| rakhmerov | as we discussed at the team meeting this is pretty easy to implement | 11:03 |
| rakhmerov | nmakhotkin can do it in 10 mins ;) | 11:03 |
| nkoffman | yes, I did it on our installation as a POC, | 11:03 |
| nmakhotkin | :D | 11:03 |
| [1]melisha | in 11 mins | 11:03 |
| nkoffman | :) | 11:03 |
| rakhmerov | :) | 11:03 |
| [1]melisha | or was it 9 mins? | 11:03 |
| rakhmerov | ok, a serious question: who will be working on it? nmakhotkin or nkoffman? | 11:04 |
| nkoffman | I can take it | 11:04 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 11:04 |
| nkoffman | is it ok for backporting? | 11:05 |
| nmakhotkin | ok | 11:05 |
| rakhmerov | then I'll tag it properly as well to backport it | 11:05 |
| rakhmerov | alright, we ran out of time already actually | 11:05 |
| nkoffman | great :) | 11:05 |
| nastya_ | do we really need to backport it? it is not so critical bug | 11:05 |
| rakhmerov | very productive meeting I think | 11:05 |
| rakhmerov | nastya_: good question | 11:06 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha, nkoffman: what do you think guys? | 11:06 |
| nastya_ | actually it ia a new feature | 11:06 |
| [1]melisha | nastya_: You are right. It is not even a bug | 11:06 |
| nkoffman | this is indeed not critical, however since this is a low risk, and usefull for our customers, it would be helpfull if backported | 11:06 |
| [1]melisha | Yes. But so easy impl will make some really cool use cases possible | 11:06 |
| LimorStotland | I don't think it mandatory for backport but it can be nice | 11:06 |
| [1]melisha | But up to you to decide | 11:07 |
| rakhmerov | my perspective: it's pretty easy to backport and if it brings some comfort for your customers then let's do this | 11:07 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: completely agree | 11:07 |
| rakhmerov | customers' happiness first | 11:07 |
| [1]melisha | :-) | 11:07 |
| LimorStotland | it have no risk and it can be very useful no way not? | 11:07 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 11:07 |
| rakhmerov | ok, are we good now? | 11:08 |
| nastya_ | ok, if it is not risky, then let's do it | 11:08 |
| nkoffman | yes | 11:08 |
| rakhmerov | any other questions? | 11:08 |
| LimorStotland | yep | 11:08 |
| nkoffman | I have a request, | 11:08 |
| nkoffman | not regarding the meeting though.. | 11:08 |
| rakhmerov | let me end the meeting then | 11:09 |
| rakhmerov | and we'll continue to talk | 11:09 |
| rakhmerov | #endmeeting | 11:09 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Nov 11 11:09:19 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 11:09 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral_bug_review/2015/mistral_bug_review.2015-11-11-10.16.html | 11:09 |
| nkoffman | sure | 11:09 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral_bug_review/2015/mistral_bug_review.2015-11-11-10.16.txt | 11:09 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral_bug_review/2015/mistral_bug_review.2015-11-11-10.16.log.html | 11:09 |
| nkoffman | I created a blueprint in heat to improve the mistral workflow type and how it is signaled, if you guys can take a look and review it would be very helpful. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/mistral-wf-signal-json-format | 11:10 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 11:11 |
| rakhmerov | just add us as reviewers | 11:12 |
| rakhmerov | at least myself and nmakhotkin | 11:12 |
| nkoffman | ok, will do, thanks | 11:12 |
| rakhmerov | we'll look at it and, if needed, will add someone else who knows Heat better | 11:12 |
| nkoffman | that would be great | 11:14 |
| rakhmerov | nkoffman: yeah, actually Heat's PTL is now a guy from Mirantis ;) | 11:16 |
| rakhmerov | Serkey Kraynev ) | 11:17 |
| rakhmerov | Sergey | 11:17 |
| rakhmerov | melisha, nkoffman, LimorStotland: here's a list of bugs we need to backport: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bugs?field.tag=liberty-backport-potential | 11:20 |
| [1]melisha | rakhmerov: That's great! Thanks! | 11:22 |
| [1]melisha | Should we also tag the 2 BPs? | 11:22 |
| nastya_ | afaik, bps do not have tags | 11:24 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: looks like there's no tags for BPs :( | 11:24 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 11:24 |
| rakhmerov | I added comments in them to do so | 11:25 |
| [1]melisha | Oh. OK. | 11:25 |
| [1]melisha | Thanks | 11:25 |
| rakhmerov | M-1 now looks like: https://launchpad.net/mistral/+milestone/mitaka-1 | 11:28 |
| rakhmerov | need to try hard to get this all done | 11:28 |
| [1]melisha | :-) Yes. | 11:29 |
| rakhmerov | all, I added a link at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MistralAgenda (at the bottom) to our today's meeting log/minutes | 11:30 |
| rakhmerov | just in case | 11:30 |
| rakhmerov | we need to have these meetings regularly I think | 11:30 |
| [1]melisha | rakhmerov: Yes. It was very helpful and productive | 11:33 |
| rakhmerov | [1]melisha: agree ) | 11:33 |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-mistralclient: Create pagination for the mistral client https://review.openstack.org/242996 | 11:36 |
| *** nitzikow_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:38 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
| *** nitzikow_ has quit IRC | 11:39 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:39 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:48 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 11:49 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:49 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 11:51 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:51 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:53 | |
| *** nastya_ has quit IRC | 11:55 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 11:58 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gal Margalit proposed openstack/mistral-dashboard: UI: Task & Execution screen refactored https://review.openstack.org/243665 | 12:24 |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:27 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gal Margalit proposed openstack/mistral-dashboard: UI: Task & Execution screen refactored https://review.openstack.org/243665 | 12:30 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 12:31 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:32 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:45 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tomer Shtilman proposed openstack/mistral: Wrap sync_db operations in transactions https://review.openstack.org/240705 | 12:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Tomer Shtilman proposed openstack/mistral: Wrap sync_db operations in transactions https://review.openstack.org/240705 | 12:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Tomer Shtilman proposed openstack/mistral: Wrap sync_db operations in transactions https://review.openstack.org/240705 | 12:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Tomer Shtilman proposed openstack/mistral: Wrap sync_db operations in transactions https://review.openstack.org/240705 | 12:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Tomer Shtilman proposed openstack/mistral: Wrap sync_db operations in transactions https://review.openstack.org/240705 | 12:50 |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:53 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:03 | |
| *** tshtilma has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gal Margalit proposed openstack/mistral-dashboard: UI: Task & Execution screen refactored https://review.openstack.org/243665 | 13:16 |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 13:19 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:37 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 13:52 | |
| *** LiatFried has quit IRC | 13:55 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| *** melisha has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| *** [1]melisha is now known as melisha | 14:08 | |
| *** melisha is now known as 16WAAQN4M | 14:15 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:15 | |
| *** melisha has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:15 | |
| *** Piet has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 14:19 | |
| *** Piet has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:25 | |
| *** Piet has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| *** bradjones|away is now known as bradjones | 14:40 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:44 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:46 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:52 | |
| *** [1]melisha has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:52 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| *** melisha has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| *** [1]melisha is now known as melisha | 14:55 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:57 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:59 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:05 | |
| *** tshtilma has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral: Add db operations for resource members https://review.openstack.org/244154 | 15:18 |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral: [WIP] Support workflow sharing https://review.openstack.org/244155 | 15:18 |
| nkoffman | Hi everyone, I proposed a blueprint and implementation regarding signaling os::mistral::workflow type, to make it compatible with other systems. if anyone could review it would be great. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/mistral-wf-signal-json-format | 15:34 |
| *** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:44 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:50 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 16:00 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:00 | |
| *** Piet has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:01 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:02 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:03 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:06 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:08 | |
| *** 16WAAQN4M has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:28 | |
| *** tshtilma has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:34 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has quit IRC | 16:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral: Removing wait() when initializing notification listener https://review.openstack.org/243146 | 16:38 |
| *** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:01 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:28 | |
| *** tshtilma has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:40 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:43 | |
| *** tshtilma has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:48 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:54 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:00 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:02 | |
| *** ninag_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:04 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** harlowja_ has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
| *** ninag_ has quit IRC | 18:09 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:18 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
| *** harlowja has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:42 | |
| *** harlowja_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:44 | |
| *** harlowja has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:50 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:53 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
| *** Piet has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:06 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 19:16 | |
| *** Piet has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:33 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:34 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:38 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:41 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
| *** LiatFried_ has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
| *** nitzikow has joined #openstack-mistral | 20:42 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 20:42 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 20:43 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-mistral | 20:46 | |
| *** nitzikow has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:00 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:03 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:24 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:48 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:53 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:08 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:20 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:33 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:37 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:38 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:50 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 22:53 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
| *** ninag has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:57 | |
| *** ninag has quit IRC | 23:02 | |
| *** Piet has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** Piet has joined #openstack-mistral | 23:25 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-mistral | 23:38 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 23:50 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!