| *** achanda has quit IRC | 00:01 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:34 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:38 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:00 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 01:03 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has quit IRC | 01:07 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:08 | |
| *** ^Gal^ has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:10 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 01:10 | |
| *** zhenguo has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:17 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 02:23 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 02:38 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 03:00 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 03:22 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 03:30 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
| *** Ephur has quit IRC | 04:57 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 05:01 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-mistral | 05:07 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
| xylan_kong | ping nmakhotkin | 06:40 |
|---|---|---|
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 06:40 | |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: I replied in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216483/3, and according to winson and your opinions, I removed my -1 | 06:46 |
| rakhmerov | xylan_kong: ok, I'll take a look | 06:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Renat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral: Switching to six module where it's not used yet https://review.openstack.org/217001 | 06:50 |
| rakhmerov | xylan_kong: just did | 06:50 |
| rakhmerov | honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about that | 06:51 |
| rakhmerov | and I don't want to push on you at all | 06:51 |
| rakhmerov | if you thing it should be blocked then do it (you have a right to do so) | 06:51 |
| rakhmerov | let's ask what Nikolay thinks about it | 06:52 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: yeah, it's not a big deal, and I also don't block things that most of people are for it. | 06:52 |
| rakhmerov | so, again, for me it doesn't seem like a big deal but I kinda see your point | 06:52 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 06:52 |
| rakhmerov | nmakhotkin: what's your opinion on this? | 06:52 |
| rakhmerov | (he's probably not online yet) | 06:53 |
| xylan_kong | he is 5 hours later than us | 06:53 |
| rakhmerov | yeah | 06:54 |
| rakhmerov | and they usually start their work at around noon :) | 06:54 |
| rakhmerov | their time | 06:54 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: ooh, you don't have work time restriction? | 06:55 |
| rakhmerov | yes, it'd kind of flexible | 06:55 |
| xylan_kong | very humane work environment | 06:56 |
| rakhmerov | but that's just mostly a culture at a particular place | 06:56 |
| rakhmerov | I'm sitting alone and don't follow that culture | 06:56 |
| rakhmerov | as the rest of the company | 06:56 |
| xylan_kong | haha :-) | 06:56 |
| rakhmerov | :) | 06:56 |
| rakhmerov | sometimes I start at 10am (as today), sometimes later | 06:57 |
| xylan_kong | it's also a little bit later for us. | 06:57 |
| rakhmerov | so I don't have actually a good time overlap with them too | 06:57 |
| rakhmerov | when do you usually start your workday? | 06:58 |
| xylan_kong | we usually start work at 9:00 | 06:58 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 06:58 |
| rakhmerov | it's good ) | 06:58 |
| xylan_kong | we 'must' start work at 9:00 | 06:58 |
| rakhmerov | :))) | 06:58 |
| rakhmerov | you mean at your company? or it's a china-wide restriction? | 06:59 |
| xylan_kong | at most of chinese company, some even start at 8:00 | 06:59 |
| rakhmerov | I see | 06:59 |
| xylan_kong | or you will lost your pay | 06:59 |
| xylan_kong | that day | 06:59 |
| rakhmerov | hm... interesting | 06:59 |
| rakhmerov | really???!! | 06:59 |
| rakhmerov | f...ck.. | 06:59 |
| xylan_kong | haha -) | 07:00 |
| xylan_kong | we get used to that | 07:00 |
| rakhmerov | ooh gosh, that sounds tough | 07:00 |
| xylan_kong | yes, you're right | 07:00 |
| rakhmerov | we used to have that kind of thing back in Soviet Union | 07:01 |
| rakhmerov | now most of the companies moved away from that | 07:01 |
| rakhmerov | most of them try to embed more flexibility in terms of how their employees work | 07:01 |
| xylan_kong | so, i have a dream, that on day, i can work outside china in a more free country :-) | 07:02 |
| rakhmerov | ok, interesting to know :) | 07:02 |
| rakhmerov | :)) | 07:02 |
| xylan_kong | you must have heard of GFW | 07:02 |
| rakhmerov | you won't believe maybe but some time ago (pretty long) I was seriously thinking about working in China | 07:02 |
| rakhmerov | GFW | 07:03 |
| xylan_kong | ooh, you can't | 07:03 |
| rakhmerov | what's that? | 07:03 |
| xylan_kong | Chinese Great Firewall | 07:03 |
| rakhmerov | aaah, yes, sure | 07:03 |
| rakhmerov | funny | 07:03 |
| rakhmerov | similar to Chinese Great Wall :) | 07:03 |
| xylan_kong | we could't access to google, facebook or some other website, unless you use VPN | 07:04 |
| rakhmerov | yeah | 07:04 |
| rakhmerov | your government protects your minds from western type of thinking, hah? :))) | 07:04 |
| xylan_kong | yes, absolutely | 07:05 |
| rakhmerov | do you think it is changing in any way towards being more liberal? or not really? | 07:06 |
| rakhmerov | ok, I guess we shouldn't be even talking about that in an open channel! :)) | 07:07 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: I really told too much about that, I begin to worry I'll be arrested :0( | 07:08 |
| rakhmerov | yeah, sorry man.. | 07:09 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: :-) | 07:09 |
| rakhmerov | I'll be sending food and gifts to you if you get into prison :) | 07:09 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: appreciate that | 07:09 |
| rakhmerov | np | 07:10 |
| rakhmerov | :) | 07:10 |
| xylan_kong | so, welcome to China! | 07:10 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: so, let's talk about technic. could you do me a favor, http://logs.openstack.org/34/204634/18/check/gate-mistral-python27/c91264a/console.html | 07:11 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: what do you think of the possible reason for that? | 07:12 |
| xylan_kong | both of my patches https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204634/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216509/ are blocked by that problem | 07:12 |
| rakhmerov | ok, let me see.. | 07:12 |
| rakhmerov | hm.. that's weird | 07:13 |
| rakhmerov | I just pushed a very tiny patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217001/ and it stumbled upon the same thing | 07:13 |
| rakhmerov | even though I just changed basestring to six.string_types | 07:14 |
| rakhmerov | so don't know yet what that means.. | 07:14 |
| rakhmerov | and it doesn't get reproduced locally | 07:14 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: yes, it's good in my deployment | 07:15 |
| xylan_kong | all the ut are successful | 07:15 |
| rakhmerov | from what I can make a conclusion that either 1) there are differencies between local and gate env or 2) something is broken in gerrit now | 07:16 |
| rakhmerov | did you try to recheck your patches? | 07:17 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: i have rechecked for a lot of times. | 07:17 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 07:17 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: but, it's much more weird that, the failures are different each time | 07:18 |
| rakhmerov | hm.. | 07:18 |
| xylan_kong | sometimes, the failure comes from tests of scheduler service | 07:19 |
| rakhmerov | now I see errors occurring only in API unit tests | 07:21 |
| rakhmerov | maybe it's related to pagination changes somehow? | 07:22 |
| rakhmerov | it seems like we have a race condition somewhere | 07:22 |
| xylan_kong | but i ran the tests several times in my environment, everything is ok. | 07:23 |
| xylan_kong | let's find the reason and fix that | 07:24 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 07:25 |
| rakhmerov | sure | 07:25 |
| rakhmerov | I have an assumption: pecan or wsme version could change so they throw slight different exceptions now | 07:29 |
| rakhmerov | I'm trying to recreate my venv | 07:29 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: ooh, i remmeber an email today | 07:29 |
| rakhmerov | https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pecan/1.0.2 | 07:29 |
| rakhmerov | pecan 1.0.2 was uploaded 3 days ago | 07:30 |
| rakhmerov | what email? | 07:30 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: [openstack-dev] [wsme] potential issues with WSME 0.8.0 | 07:30 |
| rakhmerov | yes, it now gets reproduced once I recreated my env | 07:31 |
| rakhmerov | yep | 07:31 |
| rakhmerov | we found the reason ;) | 07:31 |
| rakhmerov | need to fix it | 07:31 |
| xylan_kong | yes | 07:31 |
| rakhmerov | do you want me to do it? or would like to fix yourself? | 07:32 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: i can undertake that, if you don't have time | 07:32 |
| rakhmerov | go ahead sir | 07:33 |
| xylan_kong | I have time this afternoon :-) | 07:33 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 07:33 |
| xylan_kong | yes, sir | 07:33 |
| rakhmerov | hm.. I'm actually thinking if what they did is a valid thing from the community standpoint | 07:45 |
| rakhmerov | they really broke API backwards compatibility w/o bumping a major version | 07:46 |
| xylan_kong | do you think they will revert the changes? | 07:46 |
| rakhmerov | ooh, someone already replied exactly that | 07:46 |
| rakhmerov | dunno, I'm just trying to understand if they have to | 07:47 |
| rakhmerov | I guess nobody will make them change it back though.. | 07:47 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: according to the wsme changes, we might need change our API | 07:50 |
| rakhmerov | seems like we don't need to | 07:50 |
| xylan_kong | why | 07:51 |
| rakhmerov | so what we need to do is to move all undeclared HTTP params into REST resources declarations | 07:51 |
| rakhmerov | purely server side undercurtains change | 07:51 |
| xylan_kong | are you sure you want to put them to resource declaration? | 07:51 |
| rakhmerov | I'm not but we don't have a choice | 07:52 |
| rakhmerov | :) | 07:52 |
| rakhmerov | I think it's not so scary after all | 07:52 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: ok... | 07:52 |
| xylan_kong | i've no other better idea | 07:52 |
| rakhmerov | just because REST resource doesn't have to reproduce a DB entity on 100% | 07:52 |
| xylan_kong | yes | 07:52 |
| xylan_kong | this what i replied to you about 'input' and 'spec' | 07:53 |
| rakhmerov | it can either shrink a number of fields or add new ones which make sense for HTTP | 07:53 |
| xylan_kong | in my another patch | 07:53 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 07:53 |
| rakhmerov | didn't see it yet | 07:53 |
| rakhmerov | so let's just move these fields to rest resources, we can eve leave special comments for them, if needed | 07:54 |
| xylan_kong | ok | 07:54 |
| rakhmerov | I'll step out for a lunch | 07:56 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: ok | 07:56 |
| xylan_kong | enjoy | 07:56 |
| rakhmerov | thanks | 07:56 |
| rakhmerov | how soon are you planning to start fixing it? | 07:56 |
| rakhmerov | in an hour or two? | 07:56 |
| xylan_kong | maybe | 07:56 |
| xylan_kong | i'm working on that | 07:56 |
| rakhmerov | you mean you already started? | 07:57 |
| xylan_kong | yes | 07:57 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 07:58 |
| nmakhotkin | hi, xylan_kong, rakhmerov | 08:07 |
| nmakhotkin | I've read your comments about config samples | 08:07 |
| nmakhotkin | I'm ok with it | 08:07 |
| nmakhotkin | just voted +2 to that patch :) | 08:07 |
| *** gpaz has quit IRC | 08:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: adding configuration guide https://review.openstack.org/216258 | 08:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: adding installation guide https://review.openstack.org/215528 | 08:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: dashboard installation guide https://review.openstack.org/216663 | 08:42 |
| rakhmerov | nmakhotkin: ok | 08:50 |
| *** LimorStotland has quit IRC | 09:03 | |
| *** nmakhotkin has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
| *** LimorStotland has joined #openstack-mistral | 09:28 | |
| *** nmakhotkin has joined #openstack-mistral | 09:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral: Add resource params to reflect WSME 0.8 fixes https://review.openstack.org/217059 | 09:41 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: nmakhotkin please review https://review.openstack.org/217059 | 09:42 |
| xylan_kong | I'll leave office, and will come here for a while after dinner, to ensure we fix the problem. | 09:44 |
| *** LimorStotland has quit IRC | 09:47 | |
| rakhmerov | ok | 09:48 |
| rakhmerov | looks good to me | 09:48 |
| rakhmerov | xylan_kong: I actually found an issue | 10:00 |
| rakhmerov | please fix it | 10:00 |
| rakhmerov | I'm also going to make some changes on top of your patch | 10:01 |
| *** LimorStotland has joined #openstack-mistral | 10:18 | |
| rakhmerov | xylan_kong: let me know when you're back, I'd like to discuss something with you | 10:41 |
| rakhmerov | I'm confused about how these user types work in wsme | 10:41 |
| *** LimorStotland has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
| *** enykeev has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
| *** enykeev has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:46 | |
| *** LimorStotland has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:52 | |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: hi, are you here? | 12:04 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 12:04 |
| rakhmerov | I left a comment in your patch | 12:04 |
| xylan_kong | ok, i'll see it | 12:05 |
| rakhmerov | I somewhat don't understand how it all works | 12:05 |
| rakhmerov | do you agree with the comment? | 12:05 |
| rakhmerov | yes, please look at it | 12:05 |
| xylan_kong | let me see | 12:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: main features https://review.openstack.org/217107 | 12:05 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: for 'params' in action_execution creation, it's not a string | 12:07 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: please see https://github.com/openstack/mistral/blob/master/mistral/tests/unit/api/v2/test_action_executions.py#L111 | 12:07 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: the JsonType won't convert anything | 12:08 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: it's just for validation | 12:09 |
| rakhmerov | hm... don't understand | 12:09 |
| rakhmerov | let me think | 12:09 |
| xylan_kong | please see how 'param' is used in action_execution creation | 12:10 |
| xylan_kong | https://github.com/openstack/mistral/blob/master/mistral/api/controllers/v2/action_execution.py#L179 | 12:10 |
| rakhmerov | yes, I see that | 12:11 |
| rakhmerov | wait a second | 12:11 |
| rakhmerov | let me clarify that stuff from step-by-step from the very beginning | 12:11 |
| rakhmerov | when you declare a WSME user type what is basetype? | 12:12 |
| rakhmerov | xylan_kong: ^ | 12:13 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: i don't know what you mean... | 12:13 |
| rakhmerov | in my understanding, this is a type that is used for transferring more complex type over the network | 12:14 |
| rakhmerov | I mean this: basetype = wtypes.text | 12:14 |
| rakhmerov | so it's something that we serialize a custom type into, right? | 12:15 |
| xylan_kong | i don't know, let me look at the wsme source code | 12:15 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 12:15 |
| rakhmerov | to me it seems like it's a regular serialization pattern, nothing else | 12:16 |
| rakhmerov | where there's always at least two methods: frombasetype and tobasetype | 12:16 |
| rakhmerov | basetype in our case is obviously string | 12:16 |
| rakhmerov | custom type is dictionary | 12:17 |
| rakhmerov | so implementation of 'frombasetype' that you're proposing does not convert anything | 12:18 |
| rakhmerov | so my question: why? | 12:18 |
| rakhmerov | how is it supposed to work? | 12:18 |
| rakhmerov | because in controller we now use action_execution.params instead of body.get('params') | 12:19 |
| rakhmerov | hence action_execution.params in turn must be constructed somehow from a string provided via API | 12:20 |
| rakhmerov | does that sound reasonable or I'm missing something? | 12:20 |
| xylan_kong | hmm...in my understanding, you provide 'params' via API, it's a json object (and it should be) | 12:23 |
| xylan_kong | in the service side, the request is converted into ActionExecution object | 12:24 |
| xylan_kong | since user could put anything for 'params', so we add a validation for that, but we didn't convert its type | 12:25 |
| xylan_kong | but i don't know the call trace for that | 12:25 |
| xylan_kong | finally, in the controller, we can directly use action_execution.params to get the json object | 12:26 |
| *** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:28 | |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: the stack trace http://dpaste.com/208YZ0M | 12:29 |
| *** LimorStotland has quit IRC | 12:30 | |
| *** LimorStotland has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:30 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:32 | |
| rakhmerov | ok, when you say "you provide 'params' via API, it's a json object (and it should be)" what does it mean? What do you call a json object? | 12:32 |
| rakhmerov | REST API it's just a string in the request body | 12:33 |
| rakhmerov | right? | 12:33 |
| rakhmerov | eventually this is a string | 12:33 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: yes, need serialization | 12:33 |
| xylan_kong | and deserialization | 12:34 |
| rakhmerov | so that's why I'm saying there must be data conversion | 12:34 |
| rakhmerov | from one type to another, and vice versa | 12:34 |
| rakhmerov | maybe your code is correct, I'm just trying to understand why this conversion doesn't happen | 12:34 |
| xylan_kong | but i think this step is earlier than JsonType.validate | 12:35 |
| rakhmerov | btw, does validate() get called for basetype or a custom type? | 12:35 |
| xylan_kong | it must be called for custom type, see http://dpaste.com/208YZ0M | 12:36 |
| xylan_kong | for basetype, i'm not sure... | 12:36 |
| rakhmerov | yeah, I did some debugging and it's called for custom type | 12:38 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 12:38 |
| rakhmerov | although it is strange because I think there should be validation for both types | 12:38 |
| rakhmerov | theoretically | 12:38 |
| rakhmerov | ok, we could actually merge this patch now (it's really needed) if you think your code is correct | 12:41 |
| rakhmerov | but i'd like to experiment with all this stuff a little bit | 12:41 |
| rakhmerov | after this | 12:41 |
| rakhmerov | what do you think? | 12:43 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: sorry, i left for a while my baby is crying... | 12:43 |
| rakhmerov | ooh, sorry | 12:43 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: he is good now | 12:44 |
| rakhmerov | :) | 12:44 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: i think we can merge it now. and find the princle as time goes by | 12:45 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 12:45 |
| xylan_kong | at least, all the tests are good | 12:45 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 12:46 |
| rakhmerov | btw, I'm going to adjust some other things in API so I could play with it a little bit more and see how it really works | 12:46 |
| xylan_kong | rakhmerov: yeah, ok, go ahead | 12:46 |
| xylan_kong | i'm not wsme expert, just see its examples and try to look at its source code | 12:47 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 12:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Fixing working concurrency when value is YAQL https://review.openstack.org/217127 | 13:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Add resource params to reflect WSME 0.8 fixes https://review.openstack.org/217059 | 13:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: adding configuration guide https://review.openstack.org/216258 | 13:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: main features https://review.openstack.org/217107 | 13:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: adding installation guide https://review.openstack.org/215528 | 13:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: dashboard installation guide https://review.openstack.org/216663 | 13:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Mistral documentation: adding configuration guide https://review.openstack.org/216258 | 13:30 |
| *** Piet has quit IRC | 13:34 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral: Support action_execution deletion https://review.openstack.org/216509 | 13:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/mistral: Add fields filter for workflow query https://review.openstack.org/204634 | 13:39 |
| *** Ephur has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:41 | |
| *** Ephur has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Zhenguo Niu proposed openstack/mistral: Switch to devstack plugin https://review.openstack.org/216729 | 14:08 |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nikolay Mahotkin proposed openstack/mistral: Fixing working concurrency when value is YAQL https://review.openstack.org/217127 | 14:14 |
| *** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:16 | |
| *** Piet has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Zhenguo Niu proposed openstack/mistral-dashboard: Rename Mistral dashboard to Workflow https://review.openstack.org/217243 | 14:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Zhenguo Niu proposed openstack/mistral-dashboard: Rename Mistral dashboard to Workflow https://review.openstack.org/217243 | 14:57 |
| *** Ephur has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:58 | |
| *** LimorStotland has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:06 | |
| *** tonytan_brb has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:37 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:14 | |
| *** Piet has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:52 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** tonytan_brb has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
| *** Piet has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:26 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:37 | |
| *** achanda_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:39 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
| *** achanda_ has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:51 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:09 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 18:16 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 18:17 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:17 | |
| *** zhenguo has quit IRC | 18:23 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:16 | |
| *** tonytan4ever has quit IRC | 19:18 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
| *** Ephur has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
| *** Ephur has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:41 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 20:02 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 20:26 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:02 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
| *** Piet has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Add config example for rotating logs https://review.openstack.org/216483 | 21:50 |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:06 | |
| *** achanda_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:28 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
| *** Piet has joined #openstack-mistral | 22:32 | |
| *** sergmelikyan has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
| *** achanda has joined #openstack-mistral | 23:18 | |
| *** achanda_ has quit IRC | 23:18 | |
| *** achanda has quit IRC | 23:38 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!