pdeore | abhishekk, rosmaita, dansmith, croelandt, mrjoshi glance weekly meeting in 10 minutes at #openstack-meeting | 13:49 |
---|---|---|
pdeore | #startmeeting glance | 13:59 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Thu Aug 31 13:59:40 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is pdeore. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:59 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:59 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'glance' | 13:59 |
pdeore | #topic roll call | 13:59 |
pdeore | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda | 13:59 |
pdeore | o/ | 13:59 |
abhishekk | o/ | 14:00 |
dansmith | o/ | 14:00 |
mrjoshi | o/ | 14:01 |
pdeore | let's start | 14:01 |
pdeore | #topic Release/periodic jobs updates | 14:01 |
pdeore | We are skipping to tag m3 and will directly tag rc1, since there are some patches of stephen which still needs to merged | 14:02 |
pdeore | what do you think on this ? | 14:02 |
abhishekk | sounds good | 14:02 |
pdeore | cool | 14:03 |
pdeore | glance_store 4.6.1 released | 14:03 |
pdeore | and glanceclient we are not releasing since there is nothing merged after last release | 14:03 |
abhishekk | ack | 14:03 |
pdeore | Periodic jobs all green except fips jobs failure, need to look into the exact error | 14:03 |
pdeore | moving to next | 14:04 |
pdeore | #topic Raise FFE for new Locations APIs ? | 14:04 |
pdeore | I want to know team's opinion on raising this FFE for this | 14:04 |
dansmith | tbh, I'm not sure it's a good idea | 14:05 |
abhishekk | you need two votes for FFEs | 14:05 |
pdeore | I think things are pretty much in good shape and if we get some extra time we can verify all the corner cases and if it gets in by rc then we can backport it to stable/bobcat | 14:05 |
dansmith | I know I've not been helping with the last flurry of reviews, because I'm swamped with other stuff | 14:05 |
pdeore | abhishekk, yeah that's why thought to confirm it here :) | 14:06 |
dansmith | so I apologize for that, but I'm trying to follow the review comments and I'm just a bit worried about rushing that in with the kind of stuff that has been changing | 14:06 |
dansmith | and I've not had a chance to dig deeply into the nova part to convince myself that everything is fine | 14:06 |
abhishekk | Even though I am reviewing it carefully, I definitely need second eye on it | 14:06 |
dansmith | it also seems like the nova patches are still not passing reliably or at all? (/me checks) | 14:06 |
pdeore | well, on nova patch nova-ceph-multistore job is passing now | 14:07 |
dansmith | okay, what did you change to fix it? | 14:07 |
abhishekk | I have pointed the error on glance patch | 14:07 |
abhishekk | why it was failing | 14:07 |
dansmith | the nova patch still has this same error: https://81b3bd201171c89feee7-a605dbf95134d478b50bec2dfa092555.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/891036/4/check/nova-ceph-multistore/14600f0/testr_results.html | 14:08 |
pdeore | well, earlier i was trying trying set the image back to queued from active in one of the revert call | 14:08 |
dansmith | that's on the latest recheck | 14:08 |
abhishekk | comment on PS 20 | 14:09 |
pdeore | yeah on the WIP patch it's failing, and i think that's too bcz of the same reason, the revert of SetImageTOActive state, | 14:09 |
pdeore | I will fix that | 14:09 |
dansmith | but the WIP patch is using just new glanceclient with old glance | 14:10 |
pdeore | this is what i noticed in the logs , I'm still not sure about this dependencies :( | 14:11 |
abhishekk | I can see location import executed in above logs | 14:11 |
dansmith | I don't understand the concern over the dependencies.. this is the only order in which it can go | 14:11 |
abhishekk | but if still this is failing I think we can not rush over it | 14:12 |
pdeore | client patch is dependant on glance changes, so I think the new location part will execute, that what i understand | 14:13 |
abhishekk | And next time when you fix it, try running this tempest test in local environment | 14:14 |
pdeore | abhishekk, ok if everyone suggests so then let's move it to next cycle | 14:14 |
dansmith | pdeore: oh, that's a problem indeed | 14:14 |
pdeore | I 've already run it this time, and it didn't failed | 14:14 |
dansmith | pdeore: we need to test nova with new glanceclient and old glance separately from new glanceclient and new glance | 14:15 |
abhishekk | this should not happen I think | 14:15 |
dansmith | so I'm even more concerned | 14:15 |
dansmith | can you drop the glance dep on the glanceclient patch and do a DNM on top for testing in the similar way? | 14:15 |
pdeore | dansmith, sure I will do that | 14:15 |
dansmith | the thing that concerns me though is the DNM nova patch was failing consistently, WIP had passed, then you made a change and now it's flipped | 14:15 |
dansmith | so there's something we're not understanding about which version of which components are being tested | 14:16 |
pdeore | yeah | 14:16 |
dansmith | and this is what I mean about me not having had a chance to deeply inspect the stack | 14:16 |
dansmith | I worry that it's passing locally because versions are all lined up, but that it'll fail if they're not | 14:16 |
pdeore | yeah i got it, need to check everything thoroughly | 14:17 |
pdeore | let's move to next topic then | 14:19 |
abhishekk | This will also give us chance to refactor the tests which are using lots of same code | 14:19 |
pdeore | yeah and some test scenarios which you have highlighted | 14:19 |
abhishekk | right | 14:19 |
pdeore | shall we move ahead ? | 14:20 |
abhishekk | yes | 14:20 |
pdeore | #topic Review priority | 14:21 |
pdeore | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:sqlalchemy-20+project:openstack/glance - SQLAlchemy 2.0 migration patches | 14:21 |
abhishekk | I have reviewed most of the patches, but some patches needs another vote | 14:21 |
pdeore | as I mentioned at the start, there are still some patches to get in, which has 1 +2 from abhishekk so need one more +2, so kindly please have a look | 14:21 |
pdeore | yeah | 14:21 |
abhishekk | Also need to keep eye on failures and add rechecks with reason | 14:22 |
pdeore | yes | 14:22 |
pdeore | I think croelandt is gonna be back in next week , right ? | 14:22 |
abhishekk | I don't know the exact date | 14:23 |
abhishekk | but next week he will be ther | 14:23 |
abhishekk | may be on 4th | 14:23 |
pdeore | hmm, ok | 14:23 |
pdeore | so that's it from me for today | 14:24 |
pdeore | moving to open discussions | 14:24 |
pdeore | #topic Open Discussions | 14:24 |
pdeore | anyone has anything else to discuss ? | 14:24 |
abhishekk | I have nothing, I am creating a document to list common CI failures, which we can discuss during PTG | 14:25 |
dansmith | common glance-specific ones? | 14:25 |
abhishekk | yeah | 14:25 |
abhishekk | Will share it with team once have enough cases | 14:25 |
dansmith | cool | 14:25 |
pdeore | abhishekk, yeah sure, I will add it in PTG etherpad once created | 14:26 |
abhishekk | thanks | 14:26 |
pdeore | cool, then let's conclude for the day ! | 14:27 |
pdeore | Thanks everyone for joining ! | 14:27 |
abhishekk | thanks | 14:27 |
pdeore | #endmeeting | 14:27 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Thu Aug 31 14:27:35 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:27 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2023/glance.2023-08-31-13.59.html | 14:27 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2023/glance.2023-08-31-13.59.txt | 14:27 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2023/glance.2023-08-31-13.59.log.html | 14:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!