| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 10:46 | |
| pdeore | #startmeeting glance | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Thu Apr 14 14:00:09 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is pdeore. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'glance' | 14:00 |
| pdeore | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
| pdeore | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda | 14:00 |
| croelandt | o/ | 14:00 |
| pdeore | o/ | 14:00 |
| mrjoshi | o/ | 14:00 |
| jokke_ | o/ | 14:00 |
| pdeore | let's wait few minutes for everyone to join | 14:01 |
| pdeore | I think dansmith is on PTO | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:01 |
| abhishekk | o/ | 14:01 |
| pdeore | Everyone is here, let's start | 14:02 |
| pdeore | #topic Updates | 14:02 |
| pdeore | Abhishek has sent the Zed PTG summary on openstack-discuss ML, | 14:02 |
| pdeore | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028115.html | 14:02 |
| pdeore | Summary includes recap of what we discussed during PTG and the links to recordings as well | 14:02 |
| abhishekk | ++ | 14:03 |
| pdeore | Thanks abhishekk !! | 14:03 |
| abhishekk | I will propose priorities under or glance-specs repo early next week | 14:03 |
| abhishekk | s/or/our | 14:03 |
| pdeore | ack | 14:03 |
| pdeore | moving ahead | 14:04 |
| pdeore | #topic release/periodic jobs | 14:04 |
| pdeore | Milestone 1 is one month from now, | 14:04 |
| pdeore | So, let's try to achieve the targets we decided during PTG for Milestone 1 :) | 14:04 |
| pdeore | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-glance-ptg#L399 | 14:04 |
| abhishekk | fingers crossed :P | 14:05 |
| pdeore | yeah :D | 14:05 |
| pdeore | The periodic jobs are all green, except 3 TIME OUTS | 14:06 |
| pdeore | #topic Spec For Review | 14:06 |
| pdeore | There are some specs up for review which needs some attention | 14:06 |
| pdeore | New glance-download import method - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/836132 | 14:06 |
| pdeore | Expanding store details - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/835606 | 14:06 |
| pdeore | Delete API for metadef resource types - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/818192 | 14:06 |
| pdeore | Image Export Draft - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/837127 | 14:06 |
| pdeore | spec-lite: ability to purge all rows by glance-manage - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/819622 (one +2) | 14:06 |
| abhishekk | I think mrjoshi still needs to update store details spec with Security impact | 14:07 |
| abhishekk | and there are some comments on draft of Image export | 14:07 |
| abhishekk | we will have a discussion over glance-download import method next week | 14:08 |
| pdeore | I have updated the Delete API for resource types spec as well | 14:09 |
| abhishekk | yes, will have a look early next week | 14:09 |
| pdeore | so, requesting all to go thro' all the specs whenever possible | 14:09 |
| pdeore | abhishekk, Thanks ! :) | 14:10 |
| pdeore | moving ahead | 14:10 |
| pdeore | #topic Secure RBAC | 14:10 |
| pdeore | So, after discussing with gmann, seems we need to wait till last week of April for glance SRBAC updates as most of the RBAC team member are unavailable for Policy pop up meeting | 14:10 |
| pdeore | I'm going so set up a call with RBAC team once they are available, so if anyone from glance team is interested to be part of the SRBAC discussion, please let me know, I will send you the invite for the same :) | 14:11 |
| abhishekk | I will try to be there | 14:11 |
| pdeore | cool | 14:11 |
| pdeore | that's it from me | 14:12 |
| pdeore | I think next is croelandt :) | 14:12 |
| croelandt | I just had a couple of easy patches to review | 14:12 |
| croelandt | I was also wondering if, as soon as a $branch-em tag exists, the $branch can be considered unmaintained and all patches abandoned :) | 14:13 |
| abhishekk | 1st one is merged, and for 3rd we need jokke's view | 14:13 |
| abhishekk | croelandt, that should be triggered automatically :D | 14:14 |
| croelandt | abhishekk: yeah we still have a few patches to old branches :) | 14:14 |
| croelandt | but it should, yeah | 14:14 |
| jokke_ | croelandt: it's $branch-eol tag iirc that flags the end of an branch ... I have no idea what the -em tag is for | 14:15 |
| croelandt | jokke_: then pike is still maintained? | 14:16 |
| abhishekk | end of maintenance ? | 14:16 |
| croelandt | the last eol is ocata-eol | 14:17 |
| abhishekk | there is certain criteria for moving branches to eol | 14:18 |
| abhishekk | eol means we don't backport security patches as well | 14:18 |
| abhishekk | but for em I think we do backport it if it is security issue (AFAIK) | 14:18 |
| croelandt | hm I see | 14:19 |
| jokke_ | croelandt: yes the stable/pike branch still exists | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | it's "backport as a courtesy" for security issues into -em branches | 14:19 |
| abhishekk | right | 14:19 |
| jokke_ | when the -eol tag is applied the branch gets deleted | 14:19 |
| abhishekk | this I didn't aware about | 14:20 |
| croelandt | jokke_: but what do we backport all the way back to Pike? | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | we eol'd pike in cinder a while back | 14:20 |
| jokke_ | croelandt: as far as I'm concerned nothing and we probably should eol bunch of branches. These were supposed to be taken over by the extended stable management which never seemed to formalize | 14:21 |
| croelandt | I see | 14:21 |
| croelandt | I like the strategy of having as few branches as possible | 14:21 |
| croelandt | +1 to that :D | 14:21 |
| abhishekk | I think we can surely do eol until rocky | 14:21 |
| jokke_ | well in theory up to Victoria ... we officially support only current -2 | 14:22 |
| jokke_ | that used to be the case until this extended maintenance | 14:23 |
| jokke_ | we killed the -3 pretty soon after the new cycle started | 14:23 |
| abhishekk | -3 ? | 14:23 |
| jokke_ | current -2 | 14:23 |
| jokke_ | current -3 eve | 14:24 |
| abhishekk | hmm | 14:24 |
| abhishekk | I think we also need to notify on ML about marking eol? | 14:24 |
| abhishekk | is this correct? | 14:25 |
| jokke_ | so z being the current we would leave y and x and for courtesy w but even that would be stretching | 14:25 |
| abhishekk | I think we should keep W as we introduced RBAC in W | 14:26 |
| jokke_ | I don't think there is any specifi policy about that | 14:26 |
| abhishekk | ok, I thought I saw some mails about EOL announcement | 14:26 |
| jokke_ | and by "that" I mean ML post about it | 14:27 |
| abhishekk | so asked for confirmation | 14:27 |
| abhishekk | yep, got it | 14:27 |
| abhishekk | Ok, I think I will propose some patches early next week to mark some of our branches as eol | 14:29 |
| abhishekk | and add jokke_ and rosmaita as reviewer | 14:29 |
| jokke_ | just make sure there is no patches pending review on those branches and abandon them first if any | 14:30 |
| abhishekk | yep | 14:30 |
| jokke_ | or ping for merge if approrpriate | 14:30 |
| abhishekk | sure | 14:30 |
| pdeore | shall we move to Open Discussion ? | 14:31 |
| abhishekk | yep | 14:32 |
| pdeore | #topic Open Discussion | 14:32 |
| pdeore | anyone has anything to discuss? | 14:32 |
| jokke_ | nothing from me | 14:32 |
| alistarle | I miss beginning of the meeting, are the glance-download already done ? | 14:32 |
| croelandt | nothing from me | 14:32 |
| alistarle | *glance-downlaod discussion :p | 14:33 |
| abhishekk | alistarle, not yet, we are going to discuss it in next meeting | 14:33 |
| abhishekk | Was busy this week in some internal training so couldn't get time to have a look at it | 14:34 |
| abhishekk | but I got some requests about how we can use this in environment which does not use federated tokens | 14:34 |
| abhishekk | sorry for the delay from my side on reviews | 14:35 |
| alistarle | Hmmm I think it will be handled like if the region is not found, like "No glance endpoint found for region XXX" | 14:35 |
| alistarle | No problem for the review time :) | 14:36 |
| abhishekk | requesting every core to have a look at the glance download spec | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | ack | 14:36 |
| pslestang | abhishekk: exactly as alistarle said, we use the catalog provided by the context, if the region does not exist for the service it will raise an error | 14:36 |
| abhishekk | I think have you considered other options like all-stores and allow-failure options? | 14:37 |
| pslestang | Not yet but I will | 14:37 |
| abhishekk | pslestang, I think it will be better to mention this in the spec | 14:37 |
| pslestang | ack | 14:38 |
| abhishekk | allow-failure is important if there is multistore environment | 14:38 |
| jokke_ | neither of them is related to the specific internal plugin but the handling of the import TaskFlow as whole | 14:38 |
| abhishekk | and we can have more discussion in next week | 14:39 |
| jokke_ | so What I mean is that those are irrelevant when developing the download plugin ... we aren't going to delete the image from the source on either case :P | 14:40 |
| pslestang | ok so I will wait for discussion about that topic nxt week before modifying the specs about all-stores/allow-failure | 14:40 |
| abhishekk | but we do revert from all stores and delete it from staging, and I added my suggestion about it on the spec | 14:41 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: both of those things happens after the internal plugin has been ran | 14:41 |
| abhishekk | s/suggestion/question | 14:41 |
| abhishekk | yes, you are right | 14:42 |
| pslestang | and one thing to remind is that glance-download is supposed to be based on web-download, so we only modify the run method and all the other things will be as it is implemented into web-download plugin | 14:43 |
| abhishekk | yep, so that means it will not have any impact | 14:43 |
| abhishekk | but just make sure while you do test it locally | 14:43 |
| pslestang | ok | 14:43 |
| abhishekk | cool | 14:45 |
| abhishekk | I don't have anything else to discuss as well | 14:46 |
| pdeore | cool.. | 14:47 |
| pdeore | Thanks everyone for joining !! | 14:47 |
| abhishekk | thank you! | 14:47 |
| pdeore | Have a great long weekend !! :) | 14:47 |
| abhishekk | have a nice and long weekend | 14:47 |
| abhishekk | just FYI all, tomorrow is holiday for us(assuming everyone has it) | 14:48 |
| jokke_ | Tomorrow and Monday here in Ireland | 14:49 |
| abhishekk | cool, enjoy extra long weekend :D | 14:49 |
| pdeore | #endmeeting | 14:51 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Thu Apr 14 14:51:07 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:51 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2022/glance.2022-04-14-14.00.html | 14:51 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2022/glance.2022-04-14-14.00.txt | 14:51 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/glance/2022/glance.2022-04-14-14.00.log.html | 14:51 |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 16:20 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!