Thursday, 2021-05-27

*** mlavalle has quit IRC00:02
*** _erlon_ has quit IRC00:16
*** timburke has quit IRC00:16
*** timburke has joined #openstack-meeting00:18
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** thiago__ has quit IRC00:38
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** jmasud has quit IRC00:45
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:00
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-meeting01:01
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:06
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** jmasud has quit IRC01:07
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:10
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting01:15
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:22
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:24
*** zbr has quit IRC01:30
*** kota_ has quit IRC01:42
*** zbr has joined #openstack-meeting01:43
*** melwitt has quit IRC01:55
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-meeting01:56
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC01:57
*** xinranwang has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** kota_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:07
*** melwitt has quit IRC02:09
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-meeting02:10
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting02:10
*** jlvillal has quit IRC02:50
*** jlvillal has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** shintaro has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** shintaro has quit IRC02:55
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** h_asahina has joined #openstack-meeting03:21
*** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting03:34
*** h_asahina has quit IRC03:34
*** jmasud has quit IRC03:52
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC04:16
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:17
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:21
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting04:21
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:28
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting04:30
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC04:40
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:48
*** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting04:52
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting04:53
*** xinranwang has quit IRC05:04
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC05:16
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting05:29
*** timburke has quit IRC05:32
*** udesale has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC05:35
*** udesale has quit IRC05:36
*** udesale has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting06:12
*** slaweq has left #openstack-meeting06:16
*** arne_wiebalck has quit IRC06:20
*** arne_wiebalck has joined #openstack-meeting06:20
*** armstrong has quit IRC06:39
*** dklyle has quit IRC06:43
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting06:47
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting07:18
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau07:22
*** jmasud has quit IRC07:54
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC07:55
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC08:32
*** manubk has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
*** ttx has quit IRC08:33
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting08:34
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting08:38
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** dosaboy has quit IRC09:04
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC09:09
*** blmt has quit IRC09:58
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting10:00
*** geguileo has joined #openstack-meeting10:03
*** jmasud has quit IRC10:10
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:32
*** yamak16 has quit IRC10:33
*** macz_ has quit IRC10:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:42
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting10:59
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:00
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting11:06
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC11:11
*** pescobar has joined #openstack-meeting11:16
*** yamak16 has joined #openstack-meeting11:17
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:20
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting11:21
*** yamak16 has quit IRC11:25
*** udesale has quit IRC11:37
*** udesale has joined #openstack-meeting11:38
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting11:39
*** pescobar has left #openstack-meeting11:47
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting12:10
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:59
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
*** jbadiapa|away is now known as jbadiapa13:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:08
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting13:13
*** e0ne has quit IRC13:24
*** b1airo has quit IRC13:30
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:35
*** Steap has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC13:54
*** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:59
abhishekk#startmeeting glance14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu May 27 14:00:12 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is abhishekk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'14:00
abhishekk#topic roll call14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: glance)"14:00
dansmitho/14:00
abhishekk#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda14:00
abhishekko/14:00
abhishekklets wait couple of minutes for others14:00
Steap(so, are we moving to the-other-IRC-server any time soon?)14:01
abhishekkwill come to that in a bit14:01
*** jokke has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
jokkeo/14:02
abhishekkcool, lets start14:02
abhishekk#topic Updates14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Updates (Meeting topic: glance)"14:02
*** macz_ has quit IRC14:02
abhishekkMigration of network, So everyone is aware about current decision made by TC14:03
dansmithyup14:03
abhishekkI would suggest to follow their guidelines and be ready14:03
dansmithI have a network-independent suggestion/request14:03
abhishekksure14:04
abhishekkgot it, moving ahead14:04
dansmithonce we migrate, can we move this meeting to start happening in the glance channel itself? the meeting bots work the same there and some other projects have started doing that, qa and tc at the least14:04
rosmaitao/14:04
abhishekkI am ok for this14:04
abhishekkwould like to know what other thinks about the same14:05
dansmithit just means fewer channels open all the time, and/or less having to jump to a meeting channel, and generally less reminding14:05
dansmithpotentially also more involvement from people that just lurk in the channel but not the meeting channels14:05
jokkeConsidering the amount of complains for people jumping in middle of meeting with off topic questions just because they don't realize meeting being ongoing I'd prefer us to stay on the meeting channel for clarity14:05
abhishekk++14:05
abhishekkjokke, Steap, rosmaita any concerns ^^14:05
jokkethis seems to be one of those reasons people dislike IRC so lets not add fuel to that fire ;)14:06
SteapI'm fine either way, as long as we run away from you know where14:06
abhishekkLets see what TC suggests about the same14:06
dansmithwhen I started participating, the meeting channel was listed incorrectly on the wiki too, so I was in the wrong meeting channel for a few minutes wondering where everyone was14:06
abhishekkI remember that :D14:06
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC14:07
dansmithyeah :D14:07
dansmithanyway, not a big deal, but I don't think there's enough traffic in -glance to worry about interruptions14:07
rosmaitai prefer using a dedicated meeting channel14:07
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
abhishekkOk so we have 2 vs 2 + Steap either way14:07
Steapis it easier for everyone if I choose a side? :)14:08
rosmaitawe should weight votes by seniority :)14:08
abhishekkyep14:08
jokke:P14:08
abhishekk:D14:08
jokkeMaybe we need a bot to relay the meeting channel to the project channel :D14:09
abhishekkOk, I think lets see what TC suggests and then we can decide on this14:09
abhishekk:D14:09
dansmithif people have a strong preference for status-quo then just stick with that14:09
abhishekkack14:09
abhishekkmoving ahead14:09
abhishekk#release/periodic jobs update14:09
abhishekkSo this is M1 release week14:09
abhishekkwe don't have concrete patches merged to tag a release14:10
abhishekkSo we can skip this M1 release this time14:10
dansmithbummer14:10
jokkeabhishekk: sounds good, first tag on m214:10
abhishekkYep14:11
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC14:11
abhishekkperiodic jobs are green this week as well14:11
jokkeI think m1 is just great reminder at the beginning of every cycle how quickly the start of the cycle disappears14:11
abhishekkfor to those who have really really less active contributors14:12
abhishekk#topic Priority specs14:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority specs (Meeting topic: glance)"14:12
abhishekkSo we have two specs on priority14:12
abhishekk1. Unified quotas14:12
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC14:12
abhishekkwhich is ready to merge with 2 +2s14:13
abhishekkIf there are no concerns raised by this week, I will approve the spec14:13
jokkedansmith: sorry if I have missed anything ongoing on the quota spec. Will look it after this meeting :(14:13
abhishekk2nd Cache API - Yet working on modification14:13
dansmithabhishekk: and if there are, we're punting again?14:13
abhishekkIf there are any valid concerns which are not addressed already then we need to14:14
dansmithabhishekk: I'm waiting until we agree/merge that before I spend more time working on the things we've discussed since, and we're getting to the point where it's been mostly sitting14:14
abhishekkI understand, I need to follow some protocols14:15
abhishekkI know how it feels when work is sitting without any attention14:15
abhishekkand I am sorry for that14:15
abhishekkWe need to improve on providing reviews14:15
abhishekkthis will be lesson for us if we want to attract new contributors/ new people14:16
abhishekkdansmith, point is noted and will be addressed as well14:16
dansmiththanks, hope so14:16
abhishekkYes14:17
dansmithI'm happy to address things, but 1.5 weeks between revisions is pretty painful14:17
abhishekkunderstood14:17
dansmithon the cache thing, I haven't seen a spec update yet, did I miss it?14:17
abhishekknope, we didn't put up a modified spec yet14:18
abhishekkjokke, I guess we need to work on modification of spec14:18
jokke++14:18
abhishekkExpect a modifies spec before next weekly meeting14:18
abhishekkMoving ahead14:19
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
abhishekk#topic14:19
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)"14:19
abhishekk#topic Policy refactoring14:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Policy refactoring (Meeting topic: glance)"14:19
abhishekkI guess, me and rosmaita both have reviewed the work14:19
abhishekkand the approach sounds promising to me14:20
dansmithabhishekk: I haven't seen a review from you14:20
abhishekkI didn't put a comment there?14:20
dansmithdoes that mean you looked at it and are happy with the approach?14:20
dansmithnot that I saw14:20
dansmithI saw some comments on the earlier patches,14:20
abhishekkyes14:20
abhishekkI think I forget to post it, must be in my drafts14:21
dansmithbut the last one is the actual poc we need to decide on14:21
dansmithokay14:21
abhishekkSo apart from finding reason for Conflict and Forbidden everything else seems inline to me14:21
abhishekkI am still not able to find the reason for this14:21
dansmithI looked a bunch early on, but figured you guys would be able to spot it easily,14:22
abhishekkand on top of that why tests are not failing after changing to Forbidden to conflicts as well14:22
dansmithand I haven't tried since14:22
dansmithbut if rosmaita and abhishekk can't figure it out, I doubt I can14:22
rosmaitai was thinking it may have to do with the amount of crap you can put in a PATCH request14:22
abhishekkI will try to configure property protection and manually test the scenario14:22
rosmaitasome stuff might get kicked out before it hits the current policy layer of the onion14:23
dansmithrosmaita: right, like they were failing due to some other conflict and not the actual property protection right?14:23
rosmaitaexactly14:23
dansmithrosmaita: that's what I was saying -- the tests were just asserting what the test-writer was experiencing instead of what they should be14:23
abhishekkThen what has changed now14:23
dansmithand that's one reason putting the policy stuff up a layer is good because rejecting on policy before we get into other semantics is good14:24
dansmithi.e. instead of waiting until the DB layer14:24
abhishekk+114:24
abhishekkI think, we should start working on spec for this14:24
rosmaitaagree, but still have abhishekk's question about why the tests pass either way14:24
dansmithI'm not sure I understand "either way"14:25
abhishekkmeans in your patch you just changed tests from conflict to forbidden, then why they are passing now14:25
abhishekkand even passed the patch before that14:26
dansmithbecause of the roles change14:26
jokkewhich patch you are talking about?14:26
dansmiththey weren't passing roles before14:27
abhishekkah14:27
dansmither, they weren't passing the member role14:27
dansmithand that's what the policy rules check14:27
abhishekkjokke, give me a minute14:27
abhishekkhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/78991414:28
abhishekkdansmith, right, that could be the case14:28
dansmiththe tests are still running with unrestricted base policy until the last patch14:28
dansmithso they don't check any of the regular policy stuff, only the protections since they don't pass the member role14:29
abhishekkhmm and due to protection stuff it could have been raising 403 conflict there14:29
dansmithunfortunately it's been almost a month since I looked at this, so I'll have to load it all in my head again14:30
abhishekkOk, I will try to manual test property protection for that particular scenario14:30
abhishekk:/14:30
abhishekkok, moving ahead14:30
abhishekk#topic Bi-weekly Bug discussion (2nd)14:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Bi-weekly Bug discussion (2nd) (Meeting topic: glance)"14:31
abhishekkToday we are going to discuss bugs from glance-store14:31
abhishekkour regular tracking etherpad is, https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/glance-bug-tracker14:31
abhishekkLots of bugs are waiting there to Close, which me and Steap will do soon14:32
abhishekkLets talk about the 1st bug14:32
abhishekk#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/167595014:32
openstackLaunchpad bug 1675950 in glance_store "swift auth opts to be removed from glance store code" [High,Triaged]14:32
abhishekkthis bug is reported in 2015 for swift driver of glance14:32
abhishekkand last comment is from rosmaita on this14:33
SteapI'm not sure why it's high, but it makes sense to remove options that have been deprecated for 6 years+14:33
abhishekksince then there is no work done on this14:33
abhishekkI think jokke has worked recently on swift driver of glance, so he could help us on this14:34
jokkekk14:34
jokkeyeah that has not been exactly the priority of my investigations, but makes sense14:34
abhishekkThe action could be see whether these options are used anywhere in swift driver14:35
rosmaitanot sure why i made that High, but that was 3 years ago14:35
abhishekkif yes find the alternative and remove those options14:35
rosmaitaguess i really wanted to get it into rocky14:35
jokkerosmaita: :D14:36
abhishekkrosmaita, I think that was the reason, I remembered but unfortunately Dharini disappeared and that remain un-addressed14:36
abhishekknext one14:37
abhishekk#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/190454614:37
openstackLaunchpad bug 1904546 in glance_store "Multiattach with Image volume backed" [High,New]14:37
abhishekkAs recently commented by dansmith we do have a spec and patch for this14:37
abhishekkbut it is sitting identical since proposed due to lack of reviews14:38
dansmithand my +2 is on it, but no attention from anyone else14:38
abhishekkThis is another example where everyone of us (old team) need to priorities our reviews each week14:38
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
abhishekkI will ask the owner to include this bug reference either in spec or patch14:39
abhishekknext one14:39
abhishekk#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/118585114:39
openstackLaunchpad bug 1185851 in glance_store "glance allows delete even if cannot be deleted from ceph backend store" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Edward Hope-Morley (hopem)14:39
abhishekkThis was reported in 201314:40
abhishekkWe need to identify that this scenario/issue still exists14:40
jokkeI'm pretty sure that has not been the case ofr the long time. Was that verified still being the issue?14:41
jokke-the14:41
*** thiago__ is now known as tdasilva14:41
abhishekkIf yes then provide a fix14:41
abhishekkYes, I think that is in progress and the work is abandoned, so we need to verify that it is still a valid case of now14:42
abhishekkWe do catch InUse exception in RBD driver14:42
abhishekkMe and Steap will look into this issue and provide update on the bug14:43
jokkeyeah, I'm pretty sure that bug has been fixed for ages, and it just needs housekeeping14:43
jokkeas in to be closed as fixed14:43
abhishekkcool, we will confirm the same and update it with appropriate comment14:44
abhishekkThat's it from me, moving to open discussion14:44
abhishekk#topic Open discussion14:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: glance)"14:44
abhishekkI would like to suggest we should start following certain deadline apart from milestones for our work14:45
abhishekkThis will help us to get timely attention to work done by each of us14:46
jokkedansmith: rotating bit back to the quotas spec, I think you addressed every one of my comments there and it seems that everyone else is fond of the easy way of soft quotas. I'll read it through once more with focus but not assuming there being anything else from me left14:46
dansmithjokke: thanks14:47
dansmithabhishekk: can you provide an example of what you're suggesting?14:47
abhishekkOr we should assign particular reviewers to certain feature work/priority bugs14:47
abhishekkSo at the start of the cycle we know what feature we are going to target this cycle14:48
abhishekkwe also know who will own that work14:48
abhishekkso depending on the amount of work we should put a internal deadline for spec, actual work, that we should expect to be merged14:48
abhishekkalso we should volunteer particular reviewer to that work14:49
abhishekkwe can keep rosmaita  on standby14:50
dansmithI guess it seems to me like we don't have enough reviewers or review bandwidth to really separate duties14:50
jokkedansmith: ++14:50
dansmithwe've done things like that in nova in the past and it has been fine, but... there are a lot of people doing reviews over there14:50
abhishekkthat is the case since 3/4 years for now14:51
jokkeyeah, honestly I just need to block some time off for myself to keep focus on reviews14:51
dansmithyeah, I mean.. I like what you're saying, I just am not sure it will work well here because of the number of people14:51
abhishekkWhy not give it a try?14:51
jokkeI have way too many review tabs open, I've started and just got distracted by some ping and forgotten to get back to14:52
dansmithabhishekk: I'm all for trying anything, so I'm not trying to say no to anything :)14:52
abhishekkNext meeting we could decide work and volunteer and decide deadline14:52
rosmaita(sorry, got pulled away, just reading the scrollback now)14:52
abhishekkrosmaita, I know you have parallel meeting, so no worries14:53
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
abhishekkI think we should give it a try for 1/2 specs and lets see how it goes14:53
jokkeabhishekk: I think Dan's point was we're 3 people and even with normal change 2 is needed for merge. Honestly, we just need all to be on ball to not rely rosmaita and smcginnis to find their time on Glance work14:53
abhishekkI would like to monitor work for quotas and cache for this14:53
abhishekkI am considering Steap for reviews as well14:54
dansmithabhishekk: so to be clear,14:54
abhishekkI would also request pranali to help us in glance revierws14:54
dansmithyou're saying pick two cores per spec/effort and we merge when those two are happy instead of waiting for everyone?14:54
abhishekkYes14:55
dansmithso, first off, I think waiting for everyone to be on board for everything is a problem, so +2 to that14:55
abhishekkalso we will have reviews from Steap as well14:55
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
dansmithhowever, (b) if some person is really slammed one cycle and their sign-off is needed to  merge a thing,  it's unfortunate to limit that thing because of its assignee14:55
dansmithbut I'm definitely happy to see it drop to "two cores is enough for a spec" regardless of how we get that14:56
abhishekkIn that case we will do what we have done in last cycle, either we request rosmaita to have look or we go ahead with vote of one core reviewer14:56
rosmaitai can usually find time for a look when i am pinged14:57
abhishekk++14:57
abhishekkWe need to do something to improve14:57
dansmithfor sure14:57
abhishekkI can not sit ideal and let it go as it is14:57
rosmaitai think the policy for specs should be two +2s like for normal patches, with the option that the PTL can require more if he/she thinks it's necessary14:57
abhishekkyes14:58
dansmithI think the turnaround time and velocity is a big problem too, fwiw14:58
rosmaitai pushed for the "everyone approve" model, but that's when i was dedicated to glance 100%, probably not practical any more14:58
dansmithcheckpointing once per week (at the end of the week no less) ends up with a lot of "okay, but for sure by NEXT week" stuff14:59
dansmithrosmaita: ++14:59
jokkeWell it was the turnaround time with specs that initially got us here (at the time when we had plenty of contributors and cores) some specs got merged with that 2x+2 before majority had even time to look into them. Which we are obviously not struggling about anymore14:59
abhishekkThat is where deadline comes into the picture14:59
jokkeJust a little glimpse to history there14:59
abhishekkTIme is up15:00
*** moguimar_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
abhishekklets switch to openstack glance15:00
dansmithabhishekk: +1 for more granular deadlines if that's what you mean15:00
dansmithI have to go to another meeting15:00
abhishekkthank you all15:00
abhishekk#endmeeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"15:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 27 15:00:45 2021 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2021/glance.2021-05-27-14.00.html15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2021/glance.2021-05-27-14.00.txt15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2021/glance.2021-05-27-14.00.log.html15:00
*** moguimar has quit IRC15:02
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
*** macz_ has quit IRC15:05
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
*** tdasilva has quit IRC15:07
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC15:13
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
*** tinwood has quit IRC15:33
*** DinaBelova has quit IRC15:33
*** tinwood has joined #openstack-meeting15:34
*** DinaBelova has joined #openstack-meeting15:34
*** macz_ has quit IRC15:41
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC15:43
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting15:43
*** DinaBelova has quit IRC15:44
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:45
*** DinaBelova has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC15:51
*** manubk has quit IRC16:01
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
*** macz_ has quit IRC16:03
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC16:08
*** jmasud has quit IRC16:10
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk16:12
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** timburke has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** udesale has quit IRC16:20
*** macz_ has quit IRC16:22
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** jmasud has quit IRC16:31
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** bnemec has quit IRC16:36
*** macz_ has quit IRC16:42
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting16:48
*** timburke_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** timburke has quit IRC16:52
*** psahoo has quit IRC16:55
*** jmasud has quit IRC16:57
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC17:01
*** rosmaita has left #openstack-meeting17:10
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC17:20
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
*** jmasud has quit IRC17:29
*** macz_ has quit IRC17:58
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
*** jmasud_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
*** jmasud has quit IRC18:16
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:16
*** jmasud_ has quit IRC18:29
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
*** jmasud has quit IRC18:58
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** timburke_ has quit IRC19:03
*** timburke has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:45
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC19:58
*** eharney has quit IRC20:10
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:28
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC20:33
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC20:45
*** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC20:54
*** jmasud has quit IRC21:04
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
*** jmasud has quit IRC21:06
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting21:28
*** julian1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:33
*** jmasud has quit IRC21:35
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting21:42
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting21:52
*** jmasud has quit IRC22:09
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting22:15
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC22:16
*** julian1 has quit IRC22:25
*** julian1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC22:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** yamak16 has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** julian1 has quit IRC22:35
*** julian1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
*** julian1 has quit IRC22:44
*** julian1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** julian1 has quit IRC22:54
*** julian1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** macz_ has quit IRC23:07
*** julian1 has quit IRC23:10
*** julian1 has joined #openstack-meeting23:11
*** tosky has quit IRC23:12
*** julian1 has quit IRC23:14
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting23:34
*** moguimar_ has quit IRC23:42
*** mlavalle has quit IRC23:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!