*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 00:04 | |
*** macz has quit IRC | 00:08 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:15 | |
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:17 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:25 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 00:34 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:45 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:52 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:53 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:56 | |
*** nanzha has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:04 | |
*** redrobot has quit IRC | 01:07 | |
*** nanzha has quit IRC | 01:10 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:11 | |
*** nanzha has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:13 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 01:15 | |
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:16 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:19 | |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 01:24 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 01:29 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:31 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:31 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:42 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:44 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:49 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:49 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:52 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 01:57 | |
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:04 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 02:21 | |
*** igordc has quit IRC | 02:21 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:30 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:30 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 02:33 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:47 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:56 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:03 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** apetrich has quit IRC | 03:08 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:10 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 03:18 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:25 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:32 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 03:36 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:00 | |
*** macz has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:04 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:06 | |
*** macz has quit IRC | 04:09 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:11 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 04:14 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 04:15 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 04:16 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:22 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:27 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:31 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:42 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:44 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 04:44 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:46 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:47 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 04:49 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:53 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:18 | |
*** nanzha has quit IRC | 05:18 | |
*** nanzha has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:19 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:20 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 05:22 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 05:23 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:30 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:33 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:34 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 05:35 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 05:36 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:40 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:43 | |
*** dkushwaha_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:47 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:51 | |
*** lennyb has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:54 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 05:55 | |
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:59 | |
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:00 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 06:15 | |
*** dkushwaha_ has quit IRC | 06:17 | |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 06:25 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 06:25 | |
*** Lucas_Gray has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:34 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 06:56 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 06:58 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 07:00 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:03 | |
*** nanzha has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
*** nanzha has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:04 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:04 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
*** dkushwaha has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:05 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 07:05 | |
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:34 | |
*** dtrainor has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:41 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:49 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 07:51 | |
*** tpatil has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:52 | |
*** keiko-k has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:59 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:00 | |
*** takahashi-tsc has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:03 | |
*** joxyuki has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:03 | |
dkushwaha | #startmeeting tacker | 08:05 |
---|---|---|
openstack | Meeting started Tue Nov 19 08:05:45 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dkushwaha. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 08:05 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 08:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 08:05 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'tacker' | 08:05 |
dkushwaha | #topic Roll Call | 08:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 08:05 | |
keiko-k | Hi | 08:06 |
dkushwaha | hello keiko-k | 08:07 |
takahashi-tsc | Hello | 08:07 |
joxyuki | hi | 08:07 |
dkushwaha | hi all | 08:08 |
dkushwaha | lets start.. | 08:08 |
dkushwaha | #chair joxyuki | 08:08 |
openstack | Current chairs: dkushwaha joxyuki | 08:08 |
dkushwaha | #topic BP | 08:09 |
*** openstack changes topic to "BP (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 08:09 | |
dkushwaha | I could not have community work after summit, and started today | 08:09 |
dkushwaha | keiko-k, I have posted some comments on your spec | 08:10 |
dkushwaha | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/591866 | 08:10 |
keiko-k | Thanks. I will check it later | 08:11 |
dkushwaha | Main challenge i see is regarding introducing image create in vnfm side | 08:12 |
tpatil | dkushwaha: Heat doesn't support creation of image using file that's present in the CSAR | 08:13 |
tpatil | so we are planning to use openstacksdk in tacker to create images | 08:14 |
tpatil | Heat only allows to create image using web-download method, no support for glance-direct. | 08:15 |
dkushwaha | tpatil, yo mean, we needs glance driver ? | 08:16 |
tpatil | Also when the VNF will be terminated, tacker will need to delete those images created for a deployment flavor. | 08:16 |
dkushwaha | tpatil, +1 | 08:17 |
tpatil | openstacksdk connection to call glance image create aPI to create image from file. | 08:17 |
tpatil | instead of using glance-client, I think using openstacksdk would help to interact with many other cross services including heat client. | 08:18 |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:18 | |
dkushwaha | ok | 08:19 |
dkushwaha | tpatil, I agree to delete those created image, but I think this responsibilities(create/delete image) should not be at VNFM level. | 08:20 |
joxyuki | dkushwaha, ideally yes. | 08:20 |
joxyuki | so I think we should move that functionality to NFVO fron VNFM after V release | 08:21 |
joxyuki | sorry, after V release -> V release or after | 08:22 |
tpatil | joxyuki: agree, as in U release, we are not planning to make any changes to the NFVO | 08:22 |
dkushwaha | ok, so lets make approach like: introduce an infra driver for glance api, that will be called as in pre_vnf_instantiation, and post_termination to create and delete those images | 08:25 |
dkushwaha | and in future we will move tose calls to NFVO side | 08:26 |
dkushwaha | joxyuki, tpatil wdyt ? | 08:26 |
tpatil | dkushwaha: why infra driver? IMO, a new method in existing openstack driver would also do the same job. | 08:27 |
joxyuki | tpatil, we should have abstraction layer of openstack VIM and kubernetes VIM. | 08:29 |
tpatil | to create image, we will need VIM and it could be openstack or kubernetes. | 08:30 |
dkushwaha | joxyuki, +1, tpatil, my opinion is to not to mix image task with vnf instantiation | 08:30 |
dkushwaha | and it will reduce future refactoring tasks | 08:32 |
joxyuki | tpatil, yes. So we should have a rapper to abstract interfaces of openstack glance and k8s image management(I am not sure). | 08:32 |
tpatil | ok, so no need to add image creation interface to VnfAbstractDriver, but create a new one which VNFM will instantiate for now, and later it will be instantiate by NFVO, correct? | 08:34 |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:36 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:36 | |
*** rsimai has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:37 | |
joxyuki | almost yes, if you mean "instantiate" -> "image create". | 08:38 |
tpatil | joxyuki: Yes | 08:38 |
dkushwaha | tpatil, yes, Ex. it is like heat_client in infra_driver, and will be called in some pre_vnf_instantiation to create image | 08:40 |
tpatil | dkushwaha: Yes, it's clear now | 08:42 |
dkushwaha | anything else from anyone | 08:43 |
dkushwaha | ? | 08:43 |
dkushwaha | #topic OpenDiscussion | 08:44 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenDiscussion (Meeting topic: tacker)" | 08:44 | |
dkushwaha | We have a nice group pic from PTG https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1my6wdtuc1hf58o/AACU49pjWxzFNzcZJgjLG8n1a?dl=0&preview=Tacker.JPG | 08:45 |
joxyuki | yeah! I included it in my summit & PTG report. | 08:46 |
dkushwaha | Do we have anything else? otherwise we can close this meeting | 08:47 |
tpatil | Nice photo!!! | 08:47 |
takahashi-tsc | About Event alarm support, | 08:48 |
takahashi-tsc | First I checked zabbix plugin, but it support only command in VNF, so it is not suit our requirement... | 08:48 |
takahashi-tsc | I'd like to know if event_alarm is supported. Is there any good approach to confirm it? | 08:49 |
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:50 | |
dkushwaha | takahashi-tsc, I needs to check, will notify you | 08:52 |
takahashi-tsc | Thanks, if you give us an just overview, we will investigate the details. | 08:54 |
joxyuki | takahashi-tsc, see https://review.opendev.org/#/c/561840/11/specs/stein/reservation-vnfm.rst line264 | 08:55 |
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:55 | |
joxyuki | we are using OS::Aodh::EventAlarm when handling reservation notification. | 08:55 |
joxyuki | I think this does not meet your requirements but just information. | 08:56 |
takahashi-tsc | Thank you. Is this using EventAlarm for a specific purpose? i.e. we requires another feature to use EventAlarm directly | 08:57 |
takahashi-tsc | anyway, I'll check the above, thanks! | 08:57 |
joxyuki | yes, this is only for reservation handling, we cannot use it for general alarming. | 08:58 |
takahashi-tsc | OK, I got it. | 08:59 |
dkushwaha | Thanks all. time up.. | 08:59 |
dkushwaha | closing this meeting | 09:00 |
dkushwaha | #endmeeting | 09:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 09:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Nov 19 09:00:20 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 09:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2019/tacker.2019-11-19-08.05.html | 09:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2019/tacker.2019-11-19-08.05.txt | 09:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2019/tacker.2019-11-19-08.05.log.html | 09:00 |
*** tpatil has quit IRC | 09:00 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:00 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:02 | |
*** joxyuki has left #openstack-meeting | 09:03 | |
*** Luzi has quit IRC | 09:04 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 09:08 | |
*** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 09:15 | |
*** keiko-k has quit IRC | 09:15 | |
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:19 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 09:21 | |
*** Luzi has quit IRC | 09:21 | |
*** takahashi-tsc has quit IRC | 09:42 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 09:43 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:48 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:52 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
*** njohnston_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:53 | |
*** njohnston has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:57 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 10:15 | |
*** Lucas_Gray has quit IRC | 10:19 | |
*** Lucas_Gray has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:21 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:23 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:29 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:31 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:32 | |
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:32 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:33 | |
*** tetsuro has quit IRC | 10:36 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 10:37 | |
*** tetsuro has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:37 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:40 | |
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:43 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:50 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:51 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 10:53 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:54 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:07 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 11:11 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:21 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 11:22 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:23 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 11:24 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:53 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:54 | |
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:57 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 11:59 | |
*** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:59 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:19 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:31 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 12:32 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:32 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:34 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 12:34 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 12:34 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:36 | |
*** Lucas_Gray has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:01 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:12 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:18 | |
*** ociuhandu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:22 | |
*** davee__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:22 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
*** efried_pto is now known as efried | 13:28 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:33 | |
*** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:35 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 13:41 | |
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:42 | |
*** ociuhandu_ has quit IRC | 13:52 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:52 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:53 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
slaweq | #startmeeting networking | 14:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Nov 19 14:00:47 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
slaweq | hi | 14:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'networking' | 14:00 |
njohnston_ | o/ | 14:00 |
*** njohnston_ is now known as njohnston | 14:00 | |
*** davidsha has quit IRC | 14:01 | |
bcafarel | howdy | 14:01 |
ralonsoh | hi | 14:02 |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:02 | |
slaweq | ok, lets start than | 14:03 |
slaweq | #topic Announcements | 14:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:03 | |
slaweq | we have quite many announcements for today | 14:03 |
slaweq | Shanghai PTG summary: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010702.html and also on http://kaplonski.pl/blog/shanghai_ptg_summary/ (with photos from team dinner) | 14:03 |
slaweq | if You would like to have follow up discussion about some of the topics from this summary, please open new thread on ML for that | 14:04 |
slaweq | ok, next ona | 14:04 |
slaweq | *one | 14:04 |
slaweq | Today I sent emails about "new daddies need" for few projects: | 14:05 |
slaweq | neutron-fwaas: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010929.html | 14:05 |
slaweq | networking-bagpipe/bgpvpn: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010930.html | 14:05 |
slaweq | neutron-vpnaas: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010931.html | 14:05 |
liuyulong | hi | 14:05 |
slaweq | lets now wait if there will be any volunteers to maintain those projects | 14:05 |
slaweq | hi liuyulong | 14:06 |
slaweq | for now amotoki talked with dkushwaha who is Tacker PTL and he will take care of networking-sfc | 14:07 |
slaweq | so we already found "new daddy" for one stadium project :) | 14:07 |
njohnston | \o/ | 14:07 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
bcafarel | glad for networking-sfc :) | 14:08 |
slaweq | and today lajoskatona offered on IRC that Ericsson can take care of networking-bgpvpn and bagpipe | 14:08 |
njohnston | nice! | 14:08 |
slaweq | yeah :) | 14:09 |
slaweq | lets now wait few more weeks to see how it will be | 14:09 |
slaweq | ok, next announcement | 14:09 |
slaweq | Removing of neutron-interconnection from stadium project is in progress: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/branch:master+topic:neutron-interconnection-retire | 14:09 |
slaweq | I need to add some proper releasse note to one of those patches | 14:09 |
slaweq | and I saw that Thomas vote -1 on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694480/ as he wants to move the repo to x/ namespace | 14:10 |
slaweq | but that can be done later as separate step, at least that's how I understood this procedure | 14:11 |
slaweq | njohnston: am I right? | 14:11 |
slaweq | or am I missing something there? | 14:11 |
njohnston | yes, I think fungi's suggestion is the best way http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010893.html | 14:11 |
rubasov | late o/ | 14:12 |
njohnston | which would not change your patches, he would just revert the code removal change once he imported the code into the new x/ repo | 14:12 |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
slaweq | yes, ok. So I understood this procedure correctly | 14:13 |
slaweq | it's quite complicated process to remove such repo | 14:13 |
slaweq | ok, lets move on | 14:13 |
slaweq | next announcement | 14:13 |
slaweq | I added "review-priority" vote to gerrit, details about it can be found at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010825.html | 14:13 |
njohnston | Should we come to a general agreement as to what constitutes an "important change"? | 14:14 |
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:14 | |
njohnston | otherwise it's rather subjective | 14:14 |
slaweq | basically core reviewers can now add +2, +1 or -1 vote to this new category and in dashboard | 14:14 |
slaweq | https://review.opendev.org/#/dashboard/?title=Neutron+Priorities+Dashboard&foreach=%2528project%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron%252Dlib+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron%252Dtempest%252Dplugin+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fpython%252Dneutronclient+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron%252Dspecs+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fnetworking%252Dbagpipe+O | 14:14 |
slaweq | R%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fnetworking%252Dbgpvpn+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fnetworking%252Dmidonet+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fnetworking%252Dodl+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fnetworking%252Dovn+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fnetworking%252Dsfc+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron%252Ddynamic%252Drouting+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron%252Dfwaas+OR%250Aproject%253A | 14:14 |
slaweq | openstack%252Fneutron%252Dfwaas%252Ddashboard+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron%252Dvpnaas+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fneutron%252Dvpnaas%252Ddashboard+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fos%252Dken+OR%250Aproject%253Aopenstack%252Fovsdbapp%2529+status%253Aopen&High+Priority+Changes=label%253AReview%252DPriority%253D2&Priority+Changes=label%253AReview%252DPriority%253D1&Blocked+Reviews=lab | 14:14 |
slaweq | el%253AReview%252DPriority%253D%252D1 everyone can check what are current top priority patches to review | 14:14 |
maciejjozefczyk | \o sorry for beign late | 14:15 |
slaweq | njohnston: so, IMO "important change" may be some changes which fixes gate failures, or changes which are targeted to milestone which is just around the corner | 14:16 |
ralonsoh | slaweq, can you copy-paste this url in http://paste.openstack.org/? | 14:16 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: sorry, short version is here https://tinyurl.com/vezk6n6 | 14:16 |
njohnston | slaweq: OK, I can use that rule of thumb | 14:16 |
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:16 | |
ralonsoh | perfect! | 14:16 |
slaweq | njohnston: and also, I hope that as only cores can set those priorities we should be fine as each of us have already some experience and feeling what is "important change" for review | 14:17 |
njohnston | sounds good | 14:18 |
slaweq | maybe also fixes for bugs marked as "critical" can be marked as "high priority" to review | 14:18 |
liuyulong | Some security bug or critical bug should also be important and with higher review priority, IMO。 | 14:18 |
slaweq | liuyulong: yes, it can be | 14:19 |
*** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:19 | |
slaweq | so to sumup, I would say: lets use our personal experience and feeling for that and lets see how it will work for us | 14:19 |
slaweq | I will review this dashboard before every neutron team meeting and if there will be anything to discuss, I will raise it during the meeting | 14:20 |
slaweq | ok for You? | 14:20 |
ralonsoh | +1 | 14:20 |
liuyulong | +1 | 14:20 |
bcafarel | review of the review list? thanks :) | 14:21 |
slaweq | bcafarel: lol, yeah | 14:22 |
slaweq | ok, so one last announcement from me today | 14:22 |
slaweq | last week I prepared some plan of cleaning our CI jobs | 14:23 |
slaweq | I sent it here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010838.html | 14:23 |
slaweq | I think we can discuss about it during CI meeting in details but I would also ask everyone from the team to check it and tell me what You think about it | 14:23 |
slaweq | and that's all announcements from me for today | 14:24 |
slaweq | do You have any other things to announce? | 14:24 |
liuyulong | We have qos meeting in next our? Or we will move it to this one? | 14:25 |
liuyulong | s/our/hour | 14:25 |
slaweq | liuyulong: qos meeting is just after this one | 14:26 |
liuyulong | We have any meeting rescheduling announcementa? | 14:26 |
ralonsoh | (there is no agenda for QoS meeting today) | 14:27 |
slaweq | liuyulong: this meeting isn't rescheduled | 14:27 |
liuyulong | slaweq, sure, I remember that the ovn and performance meeting are merged to neutron team meeting, right? | 14:28 |
slaweq | right | 14:28 |
slaweq | I didn't add it to announcements | 14:28 |
slaweq | but I have new item on the meeting agenda for that :) | 14:29 |
liuyulong | OK, no more questions from me then. | 14:29 |
slaweq | but qos meeting isn't changed | 14:29 |
slaweq | ok, so lets move on | 14:29 |
slaweq | #topic Blueprints | 14:29 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprints (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:29 | |
slaweq | Blueprints for Ussuri-1: https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/ussuri-1 | 14:29 |
slaweq | I added to this list also RFEs approved recently (or those which we talked about in Shanghai and we want to work on them) | 14:30 |
slaweq | during this week I will contact with people who proposed those rfe if they will work to implement that | 14:30 |
slaweq | and if we can assign it to them | 14:31 |
slaweq | I have also one question about those RFEs: do You think we should have BP opened for each of them? | 14:31 |
slaweq | or RFE is enough? | 14:31 |
ralonsoh | depends on the size of this feature and dependencies | 14:32 |
ralonsoh | if the RFE needs some patches and no dependencies from othre features, a bug is enough | 14:32 |
ralonsoh | BP where used before for nova-neutron features, with n-lib and os-vif dependencies | 14:32 |
ralonsoh | (and OSsdk and OSclient ones) | 14:33 |
njohnston | I think an RFE might be good for the bulk tagging RFE in order to make sure we fully flesh out the API | 14:33 |
njohnston | sorry, a BP might be good for the bulk tagging RFE | 14:33 |
slaweq | ok, I see Your point, You're both right | 14:33 |
slaweq | I will create Blueprints for those which I think that will require such changes around various projects | 14:33 |
ralonsoh | having a BP is not a big overhead | 14:33 |
njohnston | +1 thanks | 14:34 |
ralonsoh | +1 | 14:34 |
slaweq | ok | 14:34 |
slaweq | if You have any other BP/RFE which should be target to Ussuri-1 and tracked here, please ping me after the meeting | 14:35 |
slaweq | I can add it to the list | 14:35 |
slaweq | and as for now, do You have any updates about BPs/RFEs from this list? | 14:36 |
slaweq | or can we move on to the next section? | 14:36 |
slaweq | ok, lets move on than :) | 14:37 |
slaweq | #topic Community goals | 14:37 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Community goals (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:37 | |
slaweq | as for community goals, we have one new on the list | 14:37 |
slaweq | Drop Python 2.7 Support | 14:37 |
slaweq | it is already accepted goal for Ussuri | 14:37 |
slaweq | njohnston - do You want to be "owner" of this one on Neutron's side? | 14:38 |
njohnston | sure! | 14:38 |
slaweq | thx a lot | 14:38 |
slaweq | as for other goals which are proposed, I will add them to this list when will be accepted by TC | 14:39 |
njohnston | for this goal I will be guided by the decisions written down in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/drop-python2-support from the TC discussion | 14:39 |
slaweq | so I think that this is all about community goals for today | 14:40 |
slaweq | #topic Bugs | 14:40 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:40 | |
slaweq | As we didn't have this meeting for few weeks, we have 3 different reports to mention: | 14:41 |
slaweq | Bugs report for week of October 28th: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010521.html | 14:41 |
slaweq | Bugs report for week of November 4th: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010676.html | 14:41 |
slaweq | Bugs report for week of November 11th: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DdWgFhMWrK67YJHBgzSbnOcFprQbOLFM16WQcPt0RS8/edit#gid=0 | 14:41 |
* njohnston is ready to go for bug deputy starting the 25th | 14:42 | |
slaweq | njohnston: thx, but first this week is mlavalle on bug deputy :) | 14:43 |
*** links has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:44 | |
slaweq | as for bugs from those reports, I would like to ask L3 subteam to take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1851659 | 14:44 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1851659 in neutron "removing a network from a DHCP agent removes L3 rules even if it shouldn't" [High,New] | 14:44 |
slaweq | which is marked as High | 14:44 |
slaweq | we have also gate failure related to networking-sfc: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1851500 | 14:45 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1851500 in neutron ""test_show_port_chain" conflicts with Flow Classifier" [Medium,Confirmed] | 14:45 |
slaweq | so I will try to ask dkushwaha if he can take a look at this | 14:45 |
slaweq | and we have https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1851194 which is related to FWaaS so I'm not sure if there will be anyone to take a look at it | 14:46 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1851194 in neutron "FWaaSv2 configures iptables with invalid port name" [Medium,New] | 14:46 |
slaweq | any other bugs You want to talk about today? | 14:46 |
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
slaweq | ok, I will take that as "no" :) | 14:48 |
slaweq | so lets move on | 14:48 |
slaweq | next topic is new in agenda | 14:48 |
slaweq | #topic Networking OVN and ML2+OVS+DVR Convergence | 14:48 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Networking OVN and ML2+OVS+DVR Convergence (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:48 | |
* haleyb waves | 14:48 | |
slaweq | as we discussed in Shanghai, I proposed to remove old meeting https://review.opendev.org/694991 | 14:49 |
*** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:49 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:49 | |
slaweq | now it's haleyb turn - do You have anything else to talk about for today? | 14:49 |
*** dtrainor has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:50 | |
haleyb | slaweq: i will touch base with you regarding sending an email to the ML | 14:50 |
slaweq | haleyb: ok | 14:51 |
haleyb | i will also update the spec one more time... | 14:51 |
slaweq | tbh I forgot about this email :/ sorry for that | 14:51 |
haleyb | np, blame it on jetlag | 14:51 |
slaweq | haleyb: ok :) | 14:52 |
slaweq | thx | 14:52 |
slaweq | anything else related to the ovn for today? or can we move on? | 14:53 |
haleyb | i don't have anything today | 14:54 |
slaweq | ok, so lets move on to the last point for today | 14:54 |
slaweq | #topic On Demand agenda | 14:54 |
*** openstack changes topic to "On Demand agenda (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:54 | |
slaweq | there is no any topics in meeting agenda | 14:54 |
slaweq | but maybe someone wants to talk about something? | 14:54 |
slaweq | if so, You have about 5 minutes | 14:55 |
slaweq | ok, I guess that there is no more topics for today than | 14:56 |
slaweq | so thx for attending and have a great week | 14:56 |
slaweq | o/ | 14:56 |
bcafarel | o/ | 14:56 |
slaweq | #endmeeting | 14:56 |
lajoskatona | Bye | 14:56 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 14:56 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Nov 19 14:56:53 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:56 |
ralonsoh | bye | 14:56 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2019/networking.2019-11-19-14.00.html | 14:56 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2019/networking.2019-11-19-14.00.txt | 14:56 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2019/networking.2019-11-19-14.00.log.html | 14:56 |
rubasov | o/ | 14:57 |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:58 | |
ralonsoh | #startmeeting neutron_qos | 15:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Nov 19 15:00:14 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ralonsoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)" | 15:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_qos' | 15:00 |
ralonsoh | Hello | 15:00 |
ralonsoh | today David is not going to attend | 15:00 |
ralonsoh | and the agenda is quite short | 15:00 |
ralonsoh | so let's wait 1 min first | 15:00 |
ralonsoh | #topic RFEs | 15:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "RFEs (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)" | 15:01 | |
ralonsoh | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1476527 | 15:01 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1476527 in neutron "[RFE] Add common classifier resource" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Igor D.C. (igordcard) | 15:01 |
ralonsoh | As commented, David is not going to attend today | 15:02 |
slaweq | hi again | 15:02 |
ralonsoh | hi slaweq | 15:02 |
*** shintaro has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:02 | |
ralonsoh | David will present the spec in drivers meeting, in Friday | 15:02 |
ralonsoh | as agreed last meeting | 15:02 |
ralonsoh | then, once the spec is approved we can continue with the code review | 15:03 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: please keep in mind that I cancelled this week's drivers meeting | 15:03 |
ralonsoh | yes.... | 15:03 |
ralonsoh | hehehehe | 15:03 |
ralonsoh | I'll talk to David then | 15:03 |
slaweq | thx | 15:03 |
ralonsoh | my bad. But he needs to present the spec and RFE to someone else | 15:03 |
slaweq | sorry for that but we will not have quorum this week | 15:04 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: but this rfe https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1476527 is approved already | 15:04 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1476527 in neutron "[RFE] Add common classifier resource" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Igor D.C. (igordcard) | 15:04 |
ralonsoh | I know, he is trying to push it for the last 18 months | 15:04 |
ralonsoh | I know, but the spec | 15:05 |
ralonsoh | just to know how to implement it | 15:05 |
slaweq | so it's "only" about reviewing spec, right? | 15:05 |
ralonsoh | yes yes | 15:05 |
ralonsoh | ok then, we can move to next section | 15:06 |
ralonsoh | #topic Bugs | 15:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)" | 15:06 | |
slaweq | it is this spec https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678865/ right? | 15:06 |
ralonsoh | exactly | 15:06 |
ralonsoh | let me send the current links for it | 15:07 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/678865 : Spec dscp + classifier | 15:07 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/670049 : Neutron-Lib - classifier migration | 15:07 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/670050 : Neutron Classifier migration into Neutron | 15:07 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/636330 : DSCP + Classifier neutron-lib | 15:07 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/636333 : DSCP + Classifier neutron | 15:07 |
ralonsoh | (all in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron_qos_meeting_chair) | 15:07 |
slaweq | ok, I will try review it this week | 15:07 |
ralonsoh | slaweq, thanks a lot | 15:08 |
ralonsoh | let's move to bugs | 15:08 |
ralonsoh | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1845176 | 15:08 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1845176 in neutron "Removing of QoS queue in neutron-ovs-agent fails due to existing references" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez) | 15:08 |
ralonsoh | and the patch | 15:08 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687922/ | 15:09 |
ralonsoh | I still need to address some problems with fullstack tests | 15:09 |
ralonsoh | https://7513009f5bff8f76e461-f83d06667d580e000031601b82c71a43.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/687922/9/check/neutron-fullstack/acf81f5/testr_results.html.gz | 15:09 |
ralonsoh | related to the need cache variables added, of course | 15:10 |
ralonsoh | but at least I think the patch is addressing the problem we have | 15:10 |
ralonsoh | any comment? | 15:10 |
ralonsoh | next one | 15:11 |
ralonsoh | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1845161 | 15:11 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1845161 in neutron "Neutron QoS Policy lost on interfaces" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez) | 15:11 |
ralonsoh | and the patch | 15:12 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/690098/ | 15:12 |
ralonsoh | this one is just failing randomly in the tests | 15:12 |
ralonsoh | but I didn't see any error related to the patch | 15:12 |
ralonsoh | (according to my understanding) | 15:13 |
*** lajoskatona has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
ralonsoh | reviews are welcome always! | 15:13 |
slaweq | sure ralonsoh | 15:14 |
slaweq | I will review | 15:14 |
ralonsoh | ok, next seciton | 15:15 |
ralonsoh | #topic Open Discussion | 15:15 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)" | 15:15 | |
ralonsoh | I don't have anything here | 15:15 |
ralonsoh | and you slaweq ? | 15:15 |
davidsha | https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/openvswitch/agent/extension_drivers/qos_driver.py#L137 | 15:16 |
ralonsoh | nice to see you | 15:17 |
ralonsoh | what is that? | 15:17 |
ralonsoh | ahhh yes | 15:17 |
davidsha | Hey, just got out of a meeting @.@ | 15:17 |
davidsha | Sorry about that | 15:17 |
ralonsoh | the DSCP ofctl implementation | 15:17 |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
davidsha | While I was working on the the classifier DSCP backend I realised that QoS and a few other extensions are not using the Native openFlow driver | 15:18 |
ralonsoh | instead of using the native implementation, the DSCP is using the cli one | 15:18 |
ralonsoh | I know this is another stone in the shoe | 15:19 |
ralonsoh | but we want to get rid of the CLI implementation and use only the native one | 15:19 |
davidsha | I'm working on a patch atm for the QoS to use the native driver, but we should probably try to deprecate: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/agent/common/ovs_lib.py#L343 | 15:19 |
ralonsoh | and you are going to refactor extensively the DSCP part | 15:19 |
ralonsoh | you should first use the native imp here | 15:19 |
davidsha | yup | 15:19 |
ralonsoh | I agree: run_ofctl should be removed ASAP | 15:20 |
ralonsoh | I'll open a bug to track this, I'll send you the link | 15:20 |
davidsha | Will I include the deprecation flag in the patch? | 15:20 |
davidsha | Ack, thanks! | 15:21 |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
ralonsoh | deprecation? | 15:21 |
ralonsoh | hmmmm | 15:21 |
davidsha | of run_ofctl | 15:21 |
ralonsoh | yes, we should | 15:21 |
*** shintaro has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
ralonsoh | let me check how many calls in neutron are made to this function | 15:21 |
davidsha | will do, In Neutron, I don't think there are any after QoS, but I did see this being used in networking-sfc, I'll properly check Neutron. | 15:22 |
ralonsoh | this is used in Neutron just in OVSBridge | 15:23 |
slaweq | ouch | 15:23 |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:23 | |
slaweq | I didn't even know that we still have such method | 15:23 |
davidsha | yes, but the native is a child of OVSBridge | 15:23 |
ralonsoh | davidsha, yes, but only few methods using ofctl | 15:24 |
ralonsoh | the problem in sfc | 15:24 |
davidsha | yup | 15:24 |
ralonsoh | is sfc using OVSBridge methods? | 15:24 |
davidsha | SFC has one or 2 calls to it | 15:24 |
ralonsoh | or it's own implementation | 15:24 |
ralonsoh | to ovsbridge methods? | 15:24 |
davidsha | https://github.com/openstack/networking-sfc/blob/d30a2f576dc511295cbb29623dfa1b9bf84f5760/networking_sfc/services/sfc/common/ovs_ext_lib.py#L70 | 15:25 |
davidsha | Line 57 above it proxies self to self.bridge | 15:26 |
ralonsoh | I understand they use it, it's easier | 15:26 |
ralonsoh | actually the way to run an os-ken application is not trivial | 15:26 |
davidsha | Ya, I'm still trying to get the DSCP mark to work | 15:27 |
ralonsoh | the good point in ovs dscp you are already inside an os-ken application | 15:27 |
ralonsoh | ok, let me open the bug to deprecate ofctl and I'll send you the link | 15:28 |
davidsha | kk, I need to drop, thanks! | 15:28 |
ralonsoh | bye | 15:28 |
davidsha | cya | 15:28 |
ralonsoh | anything else here in open discussion? | 15:28 |
ralonsoh | thank you all for attending and reading the log | 15:29 |
ralonsoh | see you here in two weeks | 15:29 |
ralonsoh | #endmeeting | 15:30 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:30 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Nov 19 15:30:07 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:30 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2019/neutron_qos.2019-11-19-15.00.html | 15:30 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2019/neutron_qos.2019-11-19-15.00.txt | 15:30 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2019/neutron_qos.2019-11-19-15.00.log.html | 15:30 |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:44 | |
*** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:48 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:51 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:56 | |
slaweq | #startmeeting neutron_ci | 16:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Nov 19 16:00:12 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 16:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ci' | 16:00 |
slaweq | hi (again) | 16:00 |
njohnston | o/ | 16:00 |
ralonsoh | hi | 16:00 |
slaweq | ok, lets start | 16:01 |
slaweq | first of all | 16:01 |
slaweq | Grafana dashboard: http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/neutron-failure-rate | 16:01 |
slaweq | please open it and we will move on | 16:01 |
slaweq | #topic Actions from previous meetings | 16:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from previous meetings (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 16:01 | |
slaweq | slaweq to investigate failed neutron.tests.fullstack.test_qos.TestDscpMarkingQoSOvs | 16:01 |
slaweq | Bug reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1852724 | 16:02 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1852724 in neutron "Fullstack test for dscp_marking_packets fails if first icmp is not send properly" [Medium,Fix released] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq) | 16:02 |
slaweq | Patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/694505 | 16:02 |
slaweq | it's even merged already | 16:02 |
njohnston | nice | 16:02 |
slaweq | so next one | 16:03 |
slaweq | njohnston prepare etherpad to track stadium progress for zuul v3 job definition and py2 support drop | 16:03 |
njohnston | yeah, I did not get to that, I'll work on it today | 16:03 |
slaweq | ok | 16:03 |
njohnston | somehow I missed it in my todo list | 16:03 |
slaweq | so, just as a reminder | 16:03 |
slaweq | #action njohnston prepare etherpad to track stadium progress for zuul v3 job definition and py2 support drop | 16:04 |
slaweq | :) | 16:04 |
slaweq | and we will get back to this in next meeting | 16:04 |
slaweq | next one | 16:04 |
slaweq | slaweq to take a look at connectivity issues after resize/migration | 16:04 |
slaweq | I did some analysis and described it in comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1850557 | 16:04 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1850557 in neutron "DHCP connectivity after migration/resize not working" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq) | 16:04 |
slaweq | but I don't know exactly why it happens like that | 16:04 |
slaweq | as it happend at least few times in tempest-slow job, which runs tests in serial, I will try to reproduce this issue locally | 16:05 |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:05 | |
slaweq | but tbh I didn't saw it this week in ci results | 16:05 |
slaweq | ok, next one | 16:07 |
slaweq | njohnston delete old tests from neutron-dynamic-routing repo | 16:07 |
njohnston | https://review.opendev.org/695014 | 16:07 |
njohnston | up for review | 16:08 |
slaweq | thx njohnston | 16:08 |
slaweq | I will review it as soon as zuul will be happy :) | 16:08 |
slaweq | ok, next one | 16:09 |
slaweq | slaweq to move neutron-tempest-with-os-ken-master to zuulv3 syntax and switch to run neutron related tests only | 16:09 |
slaweq | Patch https://review.opendev.org/694770 | 16:09 |
slaweq | ready for review :) | 16:09 |
bcafarel | late o/ | 16:09 |
slaweq | hi bcafarel :) | 16:09 |
slaweq | and this is in fact last "non-grenade" legacy job in neutron repo IIRC | 16:09 |
njohnston | nice | 16:10 |
slaweq | next one was | 16:10 |
slaweq | slaweq to fix python version in tempest-slow-py3 job | 16:10 |
slaweq | Bug reported: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1853004 | 16:10 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1853004 in tempest "tempest-slow-py3 job uses python 2.7 on subnodes" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq) | 16:10 |
slaweq | Patch https://review.opendev.org/694768 | 16:10 |
slaweq | but I found out today that this is not only related to tempest-slow-py3 | 16:11 |
slaweq | also tempest-multinode-full-py3 has this issue | 16:11 |
slaweq | and it is also addressed by patch 694768 | 16:11 |
slaweq | but also neutron-tempest-plugin-multinode-dvr job has got same issue | 16:11 |
slaweq | and patch to fix it is here: | 16:11 |
slaweq | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695013/ | 16:12 |
slaweq | so please review :) | 16:12 |
slaweq | ok, and the last one from last week is | 16:12 |
slaweq | njohnston to check failing NetworkMigrationFromHA in multinode dvr job | 16:12 |
* bcafarel tries to keep up with the flurry of review links | 16:13 | |
njohnston | I did not have a chance to look at that | 16:13 |
slaweq | will You have time to look at it this week maybe? | 16:13 |
njohnston | I will do my best | 16:14 |
slaweq | thx njohnston :) | 16:14 |
slaweq | I know You will | 16:14 |
slaweq | #action njohnston to check failing NetworkMigrationFromHA in multinode dvr job | 16:14 |
slaweq | that was all actions from last week | 16:15 |
slaweq | anything else You want to add/ask maybe? | 16:15 |
njohnston | nope | 16:16 |
slaweq | ok, so lets move on | 16:16 |
slaweq | #topic Stadium projects | 16:16 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Stadium projects (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 16:16 | |
slaweq | we already talked about neutron-dynamic-routing patch | 16:16 |
slaweq | and I don't think we have anything else to talk about here today | 16:17 |
njohnston | agreed | 16:17 |
slaweq | in next weeks we can track here progress of migrating jobs to zuulv3 and dropping py2 jobs | 16:17 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
slaweq | but for now I don't have anything else | 16:17 |
*** nanzha has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
slaweq | but maybe You have something to talk about here? | 16:18 |
lajoskatona | Hi, I just realized that CI meeting is in progress | 16:18 |
slaweq | hi lajoskatona :) | 16:18 |
njohnston | hello lajoskatona | 16:18 |
lajoskatona | I have one networkingüodl small bug: https://review.opendev.org/668904 | 16:18 |
lajoskatona | It is a unit test that fails sporadically | 16:19 |
lajoskatona | If you have some time to check it that would be helpful, sorry for adding new things to the piles | 16:19 |
ralonsoh | sorry, in this patch I don't see the UTs failing | 16:20 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: I think that this patch fixes failing UT | 16:20 |
slaweq | :) | 16:20 |
ralonsoh | I need to read better..... | 16:20 |
lajoskatona | ralonsoh: yes, soryy for bad wording, the ut that fails is networking-odl: test_feature_configs_does_not_mutate_default_features | 16:21 |
lajoskatona | ralonsoh: thanks anyway | 16:21 |
ralonsoh | thanks! | 16:21 |
slaweq | lajoskatona: I'm not odl expert but patch seems reasonable for me | 16:21 |
bcafarel | one-liner to add init/reset is reasonable yeah | 16:22 |
lajoskatona | slaweq: yeah the good thing is that this is in python, not in Java at least :-) | 16:22 |
slaweq | lajoskatona: true :) | 16:23 |
slaweq | lajoskatona: I just +W your patch | 16:23 |
lajoskatona | slaweq: thanks, a lot less recheck from this day | 16:23 |
slaweq | :) | 16:24 |
slaweq | ok, lets move on | 16:24 |
slaweq | #topic Grafana | 16:24 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Grafana (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 16:24 | |
slaweq | #link http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/neutron-failure-rate | 16:24 |
slaweq | as You may see there, empest-slow-py3 and tempest-multinode-full-py3 high failure rate today | 16:24 |
slaweq | same for neutron-grenade | 16:24 |
slaweq | and all that issues are caused by nova's patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687954/ | 16:25 |
slaweq | nova went too far with dropping py2 support | 16:25 |
slaweq | I know they were talking today how to fix this for now | 16:26 |
slaweq | so hopefully it will be fine soon | 16:26 |
njohnston | hopefully | 16:26 |
slaweq | yep | 16:27 |
lajoskatona | slaweq: so let's wait with rechecks? | 16:27 |
slaweq | lajoskatona: for now, yes | 16:27 |
lajoskatona | slaweq: ok | 16:27 |
slaweq | for sure neutron-grenade job, tempest-slow-py3 and tempest-multinode-full-py3 will fail | 16:27 |
slaweq | tempest-slow-py3 and tempest-multinode-full-py3 should be fixed when my patch to switch it "fully" to py3 will be merged | 16:27 |
slaweq | and for neutron-grenade we have already patch to remove it from neutron queue | 16:28 |
slaweq | so in fact if all those patches will be merged, we should be good even without fix on nova's side | 16:28 |
njohnston | if they need any more reviews, can you post the URLs? | 16:29 |
ralonsoh | btw, with one of those patches (devstack) USE_PYTHON3 will be True by default | 16:29 |
ralonsoh | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/649097/10/stackrc | 16:29 |
njohnston | excellent | 16:29 |
slaweq | njohnston: thx, I already sent links to those patches before | 16:30 |
njohnston | ah ok | 16:30 |
njohnston | nm | 16:30 |
slaweq | :) | 16:30 |
slaweq | other than that I think we are fine | 16:31 |
njohnston | do you think we will need to squash the changes in order to get them through the gate? Or should we wait for Nova to clean up? | 16:31 |
slaweq | njohnston: no, we don't need to squash anything | 16:31 |
njohnston | ok | 16:32 |
slaweq | as fix for tempest-slow-py3 and tempest-multinode-full-py3 is in tempest repo: https://review.opendev.org/694768 | 16:32 |
njohnston | ah | 16:32 |
slaweq | and remove of neutron-grenade is in neutron repo: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694039/ | 16:33 |
slaweq | so first patch in tempest should land and than our patch in neutron will be able to land | 16:33 |
slaweq | and than we should be good probably | 16:33 |
slaweq | but I'm not sure which version will be faster, that one or fix on nova's side | 16:34 |
slaweq | ok, I think we can move on | 16:34 |
slaweq | basically this issue is biggest issue for now, so I don't have prepared any other issues for today | 16:35 |
slaweq | but I want to talk a bit about scenario jobs | 16:35 |
slaweq | #topic Tempest/Scenario | 16:35 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Tempest/Scenario (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 16:35 | |
slaweq | few days ago I sent email http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010838.html | 16:36 |
slaweq | with some comparison of single/multinode jobs | 16:36 |
slaweq | and also with comparison of tempest- and neutron-tempest-plugin- jobs | 16:36 |
slaweq | and I would like to discuss here a bit about what do You think should we do with those jobs? | 16:36 |
ralonsoh | first, what are we going to do with LB? | 16:37 |
ralonsoh | because the future (or not) of LB could decide about those jobs | 16:37 |
slaweq | some job with LB should be still there | 16:38 |
ralonsoh | if we remove Lb too? | 16:38 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: for now we will not remove it for sure | 16:38 |
slaweq | we are starting some discussion about deprecating it | 16:38 |
ralonsoh | I know | 16:38 |
slaweq | but nothing else for now | 16:38 |
slaweq | and for now we have 2 jobs: neutron-tempest-plugin-scenario-linuxbridge and neutron-tempest-linuxbridge | 16:39 |
slaweq | maybe we could merge them into one job? | 16:39 |
ralonsoh | then we should keep it | 16:39 |
ralonsoh | we are doing different things there, but could work | 16:39 |
ralonsoh | I'll check this | 16:40 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: what do You mean by "different things"? | 16:40 |
ralonsoh | the tests are different | 16:41 |
slaweq | yes, tests are different | 16:41 |
slaweq | that's why I think that maybe we can run one job which will run tests from both tempest and than neutron-tempest-plugin repo | 16:41 |
ralonsoh | that could speed up the CI | 16:42 |
slaweq | yes | 16:42 |
slaweq | and would be one less job which can fail maybe :) | 16:42 |
slaweq | but the second question is: do we really need to run all tempest tests for it? | 16:43 |
slaweq | as it is single node job, it don't test things like live-migration for example | 16:43 |
slaweq | so basically it runs a lot of nova related tests and neutron related tests | 16:44 |
slaweq | neutron related things we can cover in neutron-tempest-plugin job as well | 16:44 |
slaweq | and from nova point of view - what we really need to test, if it's only if vm can be spawned and ssh than we have this covered in neutron-tempest-plugin tests also | 16:45 |
slaweq | so maybe we could stay only with neutron-tempest-plugin-scenario-linuxbridge job? | 16:45 |
slaweq | and exactly same situation is for neutron-tempest-iptables_hybrid | 16:46 |
ralonsoh | (I would need to check both jobs and the tests executed) | 16:46 |
*** rsimai is now known as rsimai_away | 16:46 | |
*** lajoskatona has quit IRC | 16:46 | |
slaweq | ralonsoh: sure, please check them and maybe reply to my email on ML | 16:46 |
ralonsoh | slaweq, | 16:46 |
ralonsoh | ok | 16:46 |
slaweq | we can continue this discussion there | 16:46 |
slaweq | thx a lot | 16:46 |
slaweq | next thing are grenade jobs | 16:47 |
slaweq | we have grenade-py3 and neutron-grenade-multinode in check and gate queue | 16:47 |
slaweq | those jobs are the same | 16:47 |
slaweq | only difference between them is that grenade-py3 is single node job | 16:47 |
slaweq | can we maybe drop this one? and use only neutron-grenade-multinode job? | 16:48 |
ralonsoh | single node is not used in production | 16:48 |
ralonsoh | so yes | 16:48 |
bcafarel | and I suppose we don't have any tests that *requires* single node :) | 16:48 |
bcafarel | (so also yes) | 16:48 |
slaweq | bcafarel: exactly :) | 16:48 |
slaweq | ok, so as I see agreement here, I will propose patch to drop single node job | 16:48 |
slaweq | thx | 16:49 |
slaweq | that's all from me about this topic | 16:49 |
slaweq | if You would have any other opinions/ideas about it, please reply to the email and we can continue this discussion there | 16:50 |
slaweq | from other things | 16:50 |
njohnston | ok | 16:50 |
slaweq | I sent patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694049/ which will start running queens jobs using neutron-tempest-plugin with some specific tag | 16:50 |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
slaweq | so we can drop those jobs from master branch queues | 16:51 |
slaweq | please review it also :) | 16:51 |
bcafarel | ooh nice | 16:51 |
slaweq | and one last thing which I want to mention | 16:52 |
slaweq | I have patch to switch default deployment to uwsgi https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694042/ | 16:52 |
slaweq | but it has some problems with grenade jobs | 16:52 |
slaweq | so I will investigate that and I hope it will be ready soon | 16:52 |
njohnston | cool | 16:52 |
ralonsoh | slaweq, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694266/ | 16:53 |
ralonsoh | which one is failing? | 16:53 |
ralonsoh | or you mean in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694042/ | 16:54 |
njohnston | the second one | 16:54 |
ralonsoh | perfect | 16:54 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: yes, it's failing in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694042/ | 16:54 |
slaweq | but I think I know why it is failing | 16:55 |
slaweq | I will just need to test that in gate :) | 16:55 |
slaweq | ok, that's all from me for today | 16:55 |
slaweq | anything else You want to talk about today? | 16:55 |
bcafarel | sounds like all action points from ptg have patches in progress then? | 16:56 |
bcafarel | nice work :) | 16:56 |
slaweq | bcafarel: I hope so | 16:56 |
slaweq | but if I missed anything, forgive me :) | 16:56 |
ralonsoh | no mercy | 16:57 |
slaweq | lol | 16:57 |
slaweq | ok, we are almost on time | 16:57 |
slaweq | thx for attending the meeting guys | 16:57 |
slaweq | and see You online o/ | 16:57 |
njohnston | thanks! | 16:57 |
bcafarel | o/ | 16:57 |
slaweq | #endmeeting | 16:57 |
ralonsoh | bye! | 16:57 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 16:57 | |
njohnston | o/ | 16:57 |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Nov 19 16:57:43 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:57 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2019/neutron_ci.2019-11-19-16.00.html | 16:57 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2019/neutron_ci.2019-11-19-16.00.txt | 16:57 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2019/neutron_ci.2019-11-19-16.00.log.html | 16:57 |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 17:06 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:17 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:22 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
*** geguileo has quit IRC | 17:41 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
*** munimeha1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:49 | |
*** igordc has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:52 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:04 | |
*** davidsha has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
*** ricolin has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:11 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:17 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
*** Shrews has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:42 | |
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 18:45 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:51 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:52 | |
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:56 | |
*** davee__ has quit IRC | 18:59 | |
fungi | anyone on hand for an infra meeting? | 19:01 |
frickler | o/ ... kind of | 19:01 |
tosky | yep (a point in the agenda) | 19:02 |
ianw | o/ | 19:02 |
fungi | will start in just a sec (standing in for clarkb) | 19:03 |
AJaeger | o/ | 19:03 |
AJaeger | thanks, fungi ! | 19:03 |
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
corvus | o/ | 19:04 |
fungi | okay, let's get this party started | 19:05 |
fungi | #startmeeting infra | 19:05 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Nov 19 19:05:23 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is fungi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 19:05 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 19:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:05 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'infra' | 19:05 |
fungi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2019-November/006518.html agenda | 19:06 |
* corvus hopes mordred is around for a gerrit update (gratuitous ping) | 19:06 | |
fungi | #topic announcements | 19:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:06 | |
fungi | clarkb is indisposed, so you get my retro meeting treatment | 19:07 |
* corvus hopes this doesn't mean clarkb has a cavity | 19:07 | |
fungi | my brain has a cavity | 19:07 |
fungi | anyway, i've been apprised of no announcements | 19:08 |
fungi | anyone have something? | 19:08 |
clarkb | I dont but dentist was slow getting to the exam portion if the visit | 19:08 |
fungi | i'm taking your silence as a tacit declination | 19:08 |
fungi | #topic Actions from last meeting | 19:08 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:08 | |
fungi | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2019/infra.2019-11-12-19.01.html minutes from last meeting | 19:09 |
fungi | Action items: "1. (none)" | 19:09 |
fungi | seems we can move on | 19:09 |
fungi | #topic Specs approval | 19:09 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs approval (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:09 | |
fungi | no specs up for approval which i can see | 19:10 |
fungi | #topic Priority Efforts: A Task Tracker for OpenStack | 19:11 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts: A Task Tracker for OpenStack (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:11 | |
fungi | #link http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/task-tracker.html A Task Tracker for OpenStack | 19:11 |
fungi | SotK has pushed up a refresh of the attachments work | 19:11 |
SotK | it uses openstacksdk now and also doesn't leak auth tokens | 19:12 |
fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:story-attachments+status:open | 19:12 |
fungi | ended up using tempurls right? | 19:13 |
fungi | rather than formpost | 19:13 |
SotK | indeed, I couldn't get the formpost signature that openstacksdk produced to work, and using tempurls made it easier to name the objects something that wasn't their filename | 19:14 |
fungi | mordred: ^ you may also have some input there | 19:15 |
fungi | #topic Priority Efforts: Update Config Management | 19:16 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts: Update Config Management (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:16 | |
fungi | #link http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/update-config-management.html Update Config Management | 19:16 |
fungi | i didn't make any further progress on the mediawiki puppetry update this week | 19:17 |
fungi | though i think i keep conflating this with the trusty upgrades | 19:17 |
fungi | there is work in progress to letsencrypt-ify the gitea deployment | 19:17 |
fungi | oh, though that's listed under the opendev topic already | 19:18 |
fungi | i guess the main activity under this actual topic currently is mordred's dockerification of our gerrit deployment | 19:19 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:19 | |
fungi | but it seems like he's probably not around at the moment so we can circle back to this at the end if we get time | 19:20 |
fungi | #topic Priority Efforts: Zuul as CD engine | 19:20 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts: Zuul as CD engine (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:20 | |
fungi | the bullet depth on the agenda is not entirely clear | 19:21 |
fungi | i'm not aware of any new developments on this front in the past few weeks | 19:22 |
clarkb | probably the only recent update was the discussion we had at the ptg | 19:23 |
clarkb | and how its the project ssh keys that give us trouble that we need to sort out in zuul somehow? | 19:23 |
fungi | yeah, which has been summarized on the ml | 19:23 |
fungi | oh, or did that make it into the summary? | 19:24 |
fungi | i guess that was in the zuul-related bits you elided | 19:24 |
fungi | anyway, in short, running jobs for different projects to connect to the same resource is challenging, and mordred (was it mordred?) suggested sort of proxying them by configuring jobs in one project to essentially be triggered by events from another project | 19:26 |
clarkb | yup taking advantage of the proposed http trigger | 19:26 |
corvus | yeah; i think that made it into the etherpad notes | 19:26 |
clarkb | or an internal zuul event trigger system that could be added | 19:26 |
fungi | that would require a new zuul feature, but seemed non-contentious once we talked through some of the logistics | 19:26 |
fungi | or at least a slight extension to an existing feature | 19:27 |
fungi | anyway, that's more of a zuul-side discussion we probably need to restart with the broader community now that we're not in shanghai | 19:28 |
fungi | #topic Priority Efforts: OpenDev (LetsEncrypt issued cert for opendev.org) | 19:28 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts: OpenDev (LetsEncrypt issued cert for opendev.org) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:28 | |
fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/694181 LetsEncrypt issued cert for opendev.org | 19:28 |
fungi | clarkb has been hacking on this | 19:28 |
fungi | the manually-acquired opendev.org ssl cert is due to expire in ~w0 days | 19:29 |
fungi | er, ~10 days | 19:29 |
ianw | i think it's right to go? the sticking point yesterday was failing mirror jobs, which we ended up tracking down to afs server being offline | 19:29 |
fungi | but the implementation there seems to be working and ready for review, allowing us to switch to letsencrypt fo rthose | 19:29 |
clarkb | ianw: ya I've rechecked the change | 19:30 |
clarkb | if it comes back +1 I think we can go ahead and have gitea01 try it | 19:30 |
fungi | so yeah, not super urgent would be good to land in the next few days so we have a week to make sure it's working before we end up having to buy a new cert at the last minute | 19:30 |
clarkb | ++ I should be able to approve and monitor the gitea01 change today | 19:31 |
fungi | #topic Priority Efforts: OpenDev (Possible gitea/go-git bug in current version of gitea we are running) | 19:31 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts: OpenDev (Possible gitea/go-git bug in current version of gitea we are running) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:31 | |
fungi | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006849 Possible gitea/go-git bug in current version of gitea we are running | 19:31 |
fungi | ianw has been trying to sort this out with tonyb | 19:32 |
fungi | strange disconnects on the server side and client-side errors during git fetch for openstack/nova | 19:32 |
ianw | no smoking gun, but upstream has asked us to upgrade to 1.9.6 | 19:32 |
ianw | #link https://review.opendev.org/694894 | 19:33 |
fungi | at first we thought it was isolated to gitea06 but then identified similar behavior with gitea01 | 19:33 |
ianw | if there's still issuses with that ... well ... it's a one way trip to debug town i guess | 19:33 |
corvus | does it persist if fetching directly from the backends, not going through th lb? | 19:33 |
clarkb | corvus: yes | 19:33 |
ianw | #link https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/9006 | 19:34 |
fungi | load balancer shenanigans were also an early suspicion, but got ruled out, yeah | 19:34 |
fungi | #topic Trusty Upgrade Progress: Wiki updates | 19:36 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Trusty Upgrade Progress: Wiki updates (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:36 | |
fungi | this one's on me, i guess | 19:37 |
fungi | no progress since shanghai, should be able to pick it back up again this week | 19:37 |
fungi | #topic static.openstack.org | 19:37 |
*** openstack changes topic to "static.openstack.org (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:37 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:37 | |
fungi | according to the agenda text, "Ajaeger started writing some changes" | 19:37 |
fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:static-services+status:open | 19:38 |
ianw | yeah, i'm on the hook for creating volumes, but haven't got to it yet | 19:38 |
AJaeger | fungi: some time ago ;) First one just got approved, rest needs review and AFS creation - and mnaser can take those over and then add the remaining changes... | 19:39 |
fungi | ianw: no worries, per chatter in #openstack-infra we should probably get the spice flowing on existing volumes first anyway | 19:39 |
clarkb | fungi: ++ | 19:39 |
fungi | #topic ask.openstack.org apache2 crashing daily during logrotate | 19:41 |
*** openstack changes topic to "ask.openstack.org apache2 crashing daily during logrotate (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:41 | |
clarkb | I kept this on the agenda because I hadn't heard anything new on this topic | 19:41 |
clarkb | but I was also sick late last week and may have missed updates | 19:41 |
clarkb | It looks like ask is running now | 19:41 |
frickler | it seems the patch to change the logrotate posthook is working fine | 19:41 |
clarkb | frickler: doing a restart instead of a reload? | 19:41 |
frickler | I merged that on friday and didn't need a manual intervention since then | 19:42 |
frickler | clarkb: yes | 19:42 |
fungi | that was the old fix and somehow got undone in an upgrade, right? | 19:42 |
frickler | actually 4 of them in a row | 19:42 |
frickler | fungi: no, I tested it manually earlier and it was undone by the next puppet run | 19:42 |
frickler | not sure why it started breaking initially after running seemingly fine for some time | 19:43 |
frickler | possibly some ubuntu update | 19:43 |
frickler | but I think we can regard that as solved for now, in particular giving that we may stop running it at all in the future | 19:44 |
fungi | okay, cool. thanks! | 19:45 |
clarkb | frickler: thank you! | 19:45 |
fungi | #topic Installing tox with py3 in base images runs some envs with py3 now | 19:45 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Installing tox with py3 in base images runs some envs with py3 now (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:45 | |
fungi | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2019-11-15.log.html#t2019-11-15T11:10:57 | 19:45 |
frickler | okay, the issue here are tox envs that don't specify a basepython | 19:45 |
frickler | like functional | 19:46 |
fungi | they presumably use whatever python tox was installed with | 19:46 |
tosky | as you can see from the linked job, a job from a stable branch is now failing | 19:46 |
tosky | my understanding/hope is that stable jobs shouldn't be affected by changes like this | 19:46 |
tosky | sorry, jobs running on stable branches | 19:46 |
frickler | and we seem to have changed installing tox from py2 to py3 in dib not long ago | 19:46 |
ianw | i bet somehow it has to do with I3414fb9e503f94ff744b560eff9ec0f4afdbb50e | 19:47 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
clarkb | tosky: I'm not sure we can assert that. stable jobs break all the time because the world around them has to move forward | 19:48 |
frickler | one solution is to hardcode basepython=py2 where needed, but tosky argues that we shouldn't force people to touch so many stable jobs | 19:48 |
ianw | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686524/ | 19:48 |
tosky | clarkb: uhm, I'm not sure about that | 19:48 |
clarkb | tosky: even centos 7 updates have done it | 19:49 |
tosky | we have requirement boundaries for this | 19:49 |
tosky | but something that forces all functional jobs (and maybe others) for all repositories? | 19:49 |
clarkb | tosky: it does not force it, instead it changes a default | 19:49 |
clarkb | a forward looking default | 19:49 |
ianw | yeah, i think that would do it ... i did not intend this fwiw | 19:50 |
tosky | but it changes it in a way that was needed for that stable branch | 19:50 |
clarkb | the default here is tox's default python which is based on what it got installed under | 19:50 |
fungi | the way we've defended stable jobs against such uncertainty in the past is by being explicit about what those jobs use. making them explicitly declare a python interpreter version is consistent with that in my opinion | 19:51 |
tosky | ok, time is running out and I see where it's heading, so what I'd like to ask is at least | 19:51 |
tosky | to send an email explaining the issue | 19:52 |
ianw | these jobs must be running on bionic? | 19:52 |
fungi | implicit dependencies are where we get into trouble | 19:52 |
tosky | and if someone really feels like that, an set of infra forced jobs to fix this, like the openstack->opendev migration | 19:52 |
tosky | s/forced jobs/forced pushes/ | 19:52 |
tosky | but at least the email | 19:53 |
*** artom has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
clarkb | tosky: ya I think we can send email about it. I don't think the change was intentional or expected (hence not catching it earlier), but I do think the change is likely desireable as we try to put python2 behind us | 19:54 |
fungi | to reiterate ianw's question, is this only happening for jobs running on bionic (so, say, stable/train and master branch jobs?) | 19:54 |
clarkb | in general if tox environments require a python version they should specify that in the tox config though | 19:54 |
ianw | fungi: i think it must be -- what has happened is that we install the environment now with what dib thinks is the default python for the platform | 19:55 |
ianw | which is python3 for bionic, but not for xenial | 19:55 |
fungi | yeah, if so the problem domain is small and recent | 19:55 |
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:55 | |
ianw | i can put in an override, as such, that forces bionic to install with python2 | 19:56 |
fungi | we don't need to, say, backport these basepython additions to extended-maintenance branches | 19:56 |
tosky | uhm, when was bionic introduced? Rocky? | 19:56 |
ianw | one small point is, though, *outside* the gate, it seems fragile for anyone trying to run things | 19:56 |
clarkb | ianw: yes exactly. the tox config should be specific | 19:56 |
clarkb | otherwise it is broken for people running tox locally half the time | 19:57 |
*** gmann is now known as gmann_afk | 19:57 | |
clarkb | (depending on what python version they've elected to install tox with) | 19:57 |
ianw | clarkb: yep, but i also understand tosky's point that it was annoying to throw this out there without warning | 19:57 |
ianw | (although, it was totally unintentional) | 19:57 |
fungi | tosky: whatever openstack release cycle started after april 2018 | 19:57 |
fungi | so stein, looks like | 19:58 |
fungi | because the rocky cycle started in february 2018 | 19:59 |
tosky | I totally understand it was unintentional, that was never a problem; issues happen | 19:59 |
fungi | okay, we're out of time | 20:00 |
fungi | mordred: if you're around later and want to provide a gerrit status update in #openstack-infra, there's interest | 20:00 |
ianw | tosky: i can take a point to send a mail to opendev-list about this today, and we can decide on the path | 20:01 |
fungi | and anyone with further things to discuss, find us similarly in the #openstack-infra channel | 20:01 |
fungi | thanks everyone! | 20:01 |
tosky | thanks! | 20:01 |
fungi | #endmeeting | 20:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 20:01 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Nov 19 20:01:29 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 20:01 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2019/infra.2019-11-19-19.05.html | 20:01 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2019/infra.2019-11-19-19.05.txt | 20:01 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2019/infra.2019-11-19-19.05.log.html | 20:01 |
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting | 20:01 | |
clarkb | fungi: thank you for running the meeting | 20:01 |
fungi | any time | 20:01 |
fungi | it's like a blast from the past ;) | 20:02 |
*** Shrews has left #openstack-meeting | 20:03 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
*** AJaeger has left #openstack-meeting | 20:17 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:38 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:43 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
*** igordc has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 20:58 | |
*** gmann_afk is now known as gmann | 21:03 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** igordc has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:15 | |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:29 | |
*** raildo has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:45 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
*** mriedem has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:48 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:48 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:51 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:59 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:01 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:02 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
*** priteau has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:41 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:48 | |
*** munimeha1 has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 22:53 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:54 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:03 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:07 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:11 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 23:13 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:14 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:19 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:25 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
*** efried has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:30 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 23:40 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:42 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 23:47 | |
*** Liang__ has quit IRC | 23:54 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:57 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!