*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:12 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:22 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:29 | |
*** n0ano has quit IRC | 00:30 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:35 | |
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:37 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 00:44 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:44 | |
*** lloydde has quit IRC | 00:47 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:50 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:00 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:07 | |
*** stevebake has quit IRC | 01:10 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:24 | |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 01:28 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:29 | |
*** lloydde has quit IRC | 01:47 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:50 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:50 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 02:04 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:06 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 02:06 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:07 | |
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:07 | |
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:07 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:09 | |
*** dkehn_ is now known as dkehn_zzz | 02:29 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 02:30 | |
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:30 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:56 | |
*** lloydde has quit IRC | 02:58 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 03:05 | |
*** mikal has quit IRC | 03:06 | |
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:08 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 03:13 | |
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:16 | |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
*** hemna has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:33 | |
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC | 03:42 | |
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC | 04:25 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 04:33 | |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:36 | |
*** mikal has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:40 | |
*** lloydde has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 05:48 | |
*** srini_g has quit IRC | 05:48 | |
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:05 | |
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:20 | |
*** stevebake has quit IRC | 06:46 | |
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:46 | |
*** rafaduran has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:05 | |
*** stevebake has quit IRC | 07:08 | |
*** vishy has quit IRC | 07:22 | |
*** vishy has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:22 | |
*** cp16net has quit IRC | 07:22 | |
*** cp16net has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:22 | |
*** ameade_ has quit IRC | 07:22 | |
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:23 | |
*** nikhil has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
*** markwash has quit IRC | 07:24 | |
*** _cerberus_ has quit IRC | 07:24 | |
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:25 | |
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:25 | |
*** _cerberus_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:26 | |
*** dolphm has quit IRC | 07:28 | |
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:47 | |
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:00 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 08:01 | |
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:08 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:16 | |
*** shang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:21 | |
*** stevebake has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
*** shang has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:05 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:44 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 09:50 | |
*** jmichel has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:01 | |
*** shang_ has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
*** DuncanT has quit IRC | 10:15 | |
*** DuncanT has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:16 | |
*** shang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:25 | |
*** jamespage_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:51 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:55 | |
*** jamespage_ has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 11:14 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 11:18 | |
*** shang_ has quit IRC | 11:20 | |
*** GheRivero is now known as Ghe_Rivero | 11:44 | |
*** Ghe_Rivero is now known as GheRivero | 11:45 | |
*** milner has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:45 | |
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:47 | |
*** dwcramer has quit IRC | 11:49 | |
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:05 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:29 | |
*** zykes- has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
*** zykes- has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:32 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:49 | |
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:52 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:02 | |
*** martines_ has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 13:25 | |
*** dkehn_zzz is now known as dkehn | 13:28 | |
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov | 13:31 | |
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:32 | |
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:32 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:33 | |
*** matiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:38 | |
*** matiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:38 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:39 | |
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:40 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 13:42 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 13:47 | |
*** dhellmann-afk is now known as dhellmann | 13:49 | |
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:59 | |
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:02 | |
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:05 | |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:17 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:37 | |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 14:42 | |
*** ozstacker has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:43 | |
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:44 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:55 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:56 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 14:58 | |
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:59 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 14:59 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
*** hggdh has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:06 | |
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:07 | |
*** jmichel has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
*** primeministerp has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:21 | |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:25 | |
*** gatuus has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:28 | |
*** hggdh has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:36 | |
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:51 | |
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:53 | |
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:54 | |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:58 | |
*** GheRivero is now known as Ghe_Rivero | 15:58 | |
*** rafaduran has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:02 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:06 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:11 | |
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
*** dwalleck has left #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
*** martines has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:19 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:24 | |
*** shang has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:27 | |
*** hggdh has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
*** shang has quit IRC | 16:34 | |
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:34 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:47 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
*** hemna_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:50 | |
*** garyk has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:52 | |
*** darjeeling has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:56 | |
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:59 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:59 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:01 | |
*** PotHix has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:02 | |
*** danwent_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:02 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** danwent_ is now known as danwent | 17:03 | |
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:03 | |
*** dolphm has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
*** maoy has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:10 | |
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:11 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:11 | |
*** darjeeling has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
*** darraghb has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:19 | |
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:19 | |
*** gmb has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** gholt has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:21 | |
*** jog0 has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:27 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:27 | |
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:32 | |
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:34 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:35 | |
*** dkehn is now known as dkehn_brb | 17:46 | |
*** danwent_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:52 | |
*** jhenner has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
*** danwent_ has quit IRC | 17:56 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 17:56 | |
*** stevebake has quit IRC | 17:59 | |
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman | 18:03 | |
*** maoy has quit IRC | 18:03 | |
*** maoy has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:03 | |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:04 | |
*** troytoman has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
*** troytoman-away has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman | 18:05 | |
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:09 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 18:09 | |
*** mnewby_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:18 | |
*** mnewby_ has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
*** mnewby_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:19 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
*** mnewby_ is now known as mnewby | 18:21 | |
*** dkehn_brb is now known as dkehn | 18:25 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:32 | |
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away | 18:42 | |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:43 | |
*** salmon_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:48 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 19:05 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:08 | |
*** antoine1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:09 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:13 | |
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman | 19:14 | |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:18 | |
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:22 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:26 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:33 | |
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:34 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:39 | |
*** pandemicsyn has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:44 | |
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away | 19:47 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
*** colinnich has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:59 | |
notmyname | Hi! Who's here for the swift meeting? | 20:00 |
---|---|---|
ogelbukh | o/ | 20:00 |
swifterdarrell | o/ | 20:01 |
judd7 | o/ | 20:01 |
torgomatic | o/ | 20:01 |
notmyname | ok, let me get the meetbot set up | 20:01 |
notmyname | #startmeeting swift community meeting | 20:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Mon Oct 1 20:01:39 2012 UTC. The chair is notmyname. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 20:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 20:01 |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'swift_community_meeting' | 20:01 |
notmyname | welcome and thanks for coming | 20:01 |
notmyname | there is an agenda at http://wiki.openstack.org/SwiftOct1Meeting | 20:02 |
notmyname | #link http://wiki.openstack.org/SwiftOct1Meeting | 20:02 |
notmyname | and and etherpad doc at http://etherpad.openstack.org/SwiftOct1Meeting | 20:02 |
notmyname | #link http://etherpad.openstack.org/SwiftOct1Meeting | 20:02 |
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:02 | |
notmyname | Goal for this meeting: 1) wider dissemination of stuff to work on in swift and 2) determine what people will be working on over the next 6 months (openstack grizzly). This is also prep for the summit and how talks are scheduled and planned there. | 20:02 |
notmyname | my vision is for swift to be used by everyone, every day, whether they know it or not. | 20:03 |
notmyname | great example of how this is being done today is through wikipedia and the recent iphone 5 event | 20:04 |
*** briancline has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:04 | |
notmyname | anyone who goes to wikipedia sees the media content served from a swift cluster, and the gdgt's liveblog of the iphone 5 event used swift (RAX cloud files) to serve up the content | 20:04 |
*** glange has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
notmyname | To help guide the discussion for today's meeting, I've listed out a bunch of ideas on the agenda and etherpad | 20:05 |
notmyname | These ideas have come from users and swift devs | 20:05 |
*** dfg_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
notmyname | Just to cover the bases, just because I listed something here doesn't mean it will get implemented, nor does the absence of an item mean it won't get implemented. | 20:05 |
*** redbo has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
notmyname | I'll be goving over each category in turn. please add your items as you see fit, and if you are interested in the feature, please add your name/org so we can keep a rough poll of what's important to who. | 20:05 |
*** adrian_smith has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:06 | |
notmyname | I think there are 4 broad areas for swift development | 20:06 |
notmyname | he first is focusing on new contributors | 20:06 |
notmyname | This helps swift in 2 ways. One, it adds momentum to the project by adding more devs and dev teams as contributors. Two, the process of making the codebase more friendly to new devs simply makes the codebase better for existing devs too. | 20:06 |
*** spligak has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:06 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:06 | |
notmyname | A good way to help new devs get involved is to provide and improve our getting started docs. Docs about the code organization, overall system design, and improvements around setting up and testing a dev environment would go a long way to facilitating new devs coming into the project. | 20:07 |
notmyname | Would anyone like to work on this, or is there anything to add in this category? | 20:07 |
*** scotticus has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:07 | |
notmyname | The second major area for swift development is focusing on new deployers. Deployers are the people who actually choose swift over alternatives and keep it running in production day in and day out. The features deployers look for have to do with automation, performance, and operational costs. | 20:08 |
zaitcev | I think it's the usual place for new people to start. | 20:08 |
*** yuanz has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:08 | |
notmyname | zaitcev: docs or deployer concerns? | 20:08 |
ogelbukh | we've got some docs on swift internals here at Mirantis | 20:08 |
zaitcev | docs | 20:08 |
ogelbukh | some of them we've published to our blog | 20:08 |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 20:08 | |
*** CrackerJackMack has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:08 | |
notmyname | ogelbukh: cool. anything you can do to add some of those to the docs in the codebase? | 20:09 |
ogelbukh | others mostly internal materials and kb stuff | 20:09 |
zykes- | hoii notmyname ! | 20:09 |
ogelbukh | notmyname: if we can break down into subsections | 20:10 |
notmyname | if anyone is interested in or working on the deployment category of things, please add your name/org there too | 20:10 |
ogelbukh | I think we can try to list anything we have | 20:10 |
notmyname | ogelbukh: great | 20:10 |
zaitcev | Deployment is also common to work on, I think. Here's one thingie, installs Swift among other things - https://github.com/derekhiggins/os-installer | 20:11 |
notmyname | zaitcev: that's cool | 20:12 |
tongli | guys, I've started looking at the multi-range support. | 20:12 |
briancline | is there interest enough in better docs for folks running swift on alternative *nix platforms, in addition to what's there today? | 20:12 |
ogelbukh | regarding deployment, it's interesting to know the status of multi-region | 20:13 |
tongli | I think that the getting started dev guide and few experienced swift developers taking turns really monitor the questions regarding the swift develoment will be good. | 20:13 |
notmyname | briancline: there are several things that have come up from time to time, but the core dev mostly see ubuntu+xfs | 20:13 |
*** aabes has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:14 | |
notmyname | tongli: go ahead and add your name to the etherpad please | 20:14 |
*** aabes is now known as Guest80024 | 20:14 | |
notmyname | briancline: and the openstack CI testing isn't very broad as far as differing platforms goes | 20:14 |
notmyname | briancline: so the biggest concerns are around supporting the code and regressions and reliable testing for it | 20:14 |
notmyname | The third major category of swift development focuses on client apps. As nice as a REST-based API is, the vast majority of users will never touch HTTP. Good client apps bring a healthy ecosystem to the project and help swift thrive. | 20:15 |
tongli | john, you mean put my name after the feature? | 20:15 |
notmyname | What can we do to provide tools an information to the people making the client apps so that they add swift support to their products? | 20:15 |
notmyname | tongli: ya, I saw you did. thanks | 20:15 |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:15 | |
notmyname | One way is to encourage community language bindings (Rackspace has several, as do other deployers like SoftLayer and HP). We can also provide docs around how to design good swift clients and how to design data sets to be used with swift. | 20:16 |
notmyname | I don't want to say that all swift needs is better docs, but there are areas where better docs would help ;-) | 20:16 |
ogelbukh | it's hard to overestimate the importance of docs ) | 20:17 |
adrian_smith | Another way to encourage client apps would be CORS compatibility | 20:17 |
briancline | notmyname: is that due to lack of easily accessible expertise with alternative platforms and even distributions? would also be interested in hearing more offline about the details on support concerns | 20:17 |
pandemicsyn | api docs with some sample apps, or maybe links to opensource apps might be handy | 20:17 |
notmyname | briancline: ya, that's part of it | 20:17 |
adrian_smith | Has there been anything done on this recently? | 20:18 |
notmyname | pandemicsyn: good idea, can you add it to the etherpad | 20:18 |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:18 | |
notmyname | I'll be using the etherpad to facilitate a similar discussion at the summit | 20:18 |
adrian_smith | Last I checked we were looking to put this kind of thing out into a separate project rather than keep in in the core project. | 20:18 |
tongli | how about the idea I had above to have one take turns to supervise the doc and answer very technical questions, say like 1per a month? | 20:19 |
notmyname | adrian_smith: there was a patch for it (was it yours?) but it never got merged | 20:19 |
notmyname | adrian_smith: I don't immediately see why it would need to be in a separate project | 20:19 |
Guest80024 | some analysis / comparison to other storage solutions out there might be helpful to increase adoption | 20:19 |
adrian_smith | notmyname: it was yes. I meant to follow up and put it in a separate project but just haven't had a chance yet. | 20:19 |
notmyname | adrian_smith: ah ok. ya, I'd love to see full CORS support for swift | 20:20 |
scotticus | notmyname: working on it. | 20:20 |
adrian_smith | notmyname: just rereading your review now, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/6909/ | 20:20 |
notmyname | scotticus: CORS? cool | 20:20 |
notmyname | scotticus: you and adrian_smith should talk ;-) | 20:21 |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 20:21 | |
*** jjm3lp has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:21 | |
adrian_smith | notmyname: I'll try and take your comments into the next changeset | 20:21 |
notmyname | moving to the next big category... | 20:22 |
notmyname | The fourth major area is a focus on new end users. The end users are ultimately why we're working on this. This category is for things that are user-facing. Users want features to meet a specific pain point or to open up new use cases for the storage. For example, on-disk encryption is a pain point for some users for compliance reasons. On the other hand, a tiered storage cluster would allow swift to solve some new use cases. | 20:22 |
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:22 | |
ogelbukh | we've done a design for on-disk encryption as a part of joint effort with Webex | 20:23 |
notmyname | ogelbukh: ya, I came across your blog post this morning | 20:23 |
ogelbukh | there's a link to blog on it | 20:23 |
notmyname | ogelbukh: do you have an implementation for it yet? | 20:23 |
ogelbukh | not ready to publish it yet | 20:24 |
notmyname | ogelbukh: also, I'd love for you to submit a proposal to talk about it at the design summit (summit.openstack.org) | 20:24 |
ogelbukh | but we're working on it | 20:24 |
adrian_smith | ogelbukh: could you post a link to your post. sounds interesting. love to see how you manage keys. | 20:24 |
notmyname | Finally, there's the "catch-all" of "make swift more awesome". These are things like code refactorings, speed improvements, and system support. These are issues that get a lot of attention from the swift devs since it's what we deal with on a daily basis. These are things that will always be improved and will make up the largest number of commits in any swift release. | 20:24 |
ogelbukh | http://www.mirantis.com/blog/openstack-swift-encryption-architecture/ | 20:24 |
creiht | yeah the encryption part is pretty easy, the key management is where things get sticky | 20:24 |
ogelbukh | yes, that's the hardest part | 20:25 |
ogelbukh | for the initial implementation it's very simple | 20:25 |
creiht | I've wondered if it would deserve its own service | 20:25 |
glange | keys as a service? | 20:25 |
ogelbukh | we need pluggable back-end there eventually | 20:25 |
judd7 | is keystone a hard requirement these days? | 20:26 |
notmyname | judd7: for swift? it's never been a requirement for running swift | 20:26 |
creiht | I imagine keys are going to be more important in the other projects | 20:26 |
ogelbukh | not really hard, i believe | 20:26 |
zaitcev | Keystone is not a requirement to run Swift but some distros may pull it in as a dependency. | 20:26 |
Guest80024 | you're thinking of having keystone serve out keys? | 20:26 |
CrackerJackMack | Guest20200: seems like a fit | 20:26 |
judd7 | it's in the name. :) | 20:26 |
creiht | lol | 20:26 |
notmyname | hehe | 20:26 |
Guest80024 | might make sense - having tenant level keys + user level keys might make much sense | 20:27 |
judd7 | As long as we need ANOTHER key management project in the universe, it might as well be in keystone. | 20:27 |
judd7 | Unless the keystone devs want to make that a pluggable backend too. | 20:28 |
judd7 | Which is fine. Would help corporate adoption. | 20:28 |
creiht | all things are pluggable in openstack right? | 20:28 |
creiht | :) | 20:28 |
notmyname | creiht: isnt' it all middleware? | 20:28 |
redbo | encryption is "easy" | 20:28 |
*** primeministerp has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
judd7 | "keep your keys in verisign's or whomsoever's safe." | 20:29 |
judd7 | "we default to sqlite. | 20:29 |
creiht | judd7: yeah | 20:29 |
creiht | I haven't done very much research in that area though | 20:29 |
*** mattray has quit IRC | 20:30 | |
notmyname | is there any work being done on this already in keystone? | 20:30 |
judd7 | I might pull something together. Dell has/needs that data for our own efforts. | 20:30 |
*** milner has quit IRC | 20:30 | |
notmyname | judd7: cool. also, submit a talk for it for the summit :-) | 20:30 |
judd7 | And by "pull together" I merely mean names/versions of customers who have at least asked us about it. | 20:30 |
redbo | there are some big concerns I have about encryption | 20:31 |
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:31 | |
Guest80024 | seems that mirantis is already doing a talk about their arch | 20:31 |
ogelbukh | redbo: could you please share some? | 20:32 |
notmyname | Guest80024: ogelbukh: not in the technical tracks though | 20:32 |
notmyname | what else in the feature list or category list would you like to discuss before moving on to the summit plans? | 20:32 |
redbo | if it's implemented as middleware, I'm assuming you'll lose the ability to serve ranges inexpensively | 20:32 |
redbo | as opposed to something like an encrypted block device | 20:33 |
adrian_smith | unique-as-possible data placement is really interesting | 20:33 |
Guest80024 | (reading the blog) - they encrypt each block seperatly | 20:33 |
Guest80024 | not block - each chunk. | 20:33 |
ogelbukh | yes, it's by-chunk | 20:33 |
judd7 | CPU++ | 20:33 |
adrian_smith | it really opens the door for distributed clusters | 20:33 |
notmyname | redbo: ogelbukh: we've got an implementation at swiftstack that uses LUKS devices | 20:33 |
notmyname | adrian_smith: ya, the unique-as-possible is really cool. it's already in swift, but it needs to be expanded somewhat for the global clusters | 20:34 |
redbo | my other concern is mostly CPU usage | 20:34 |
ogelbukh | should be actually faster then middleware encryption | 20:35 |
ogelbukh | however, it's all or nothing | 20:35 |
Guest80024 | can you elaborate on unique-as-possible? | 20:35 |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:35 | |
Guest80024 | (i.e. link?) | 20:35 |
adrian_smith | notmyname: sure. it's a really attractive feature. looking forward to seeing where it goes | 20:35 |
ogelbukh | some range of options here ) | 20:35 |
*** hemna has quit IRC | 20:36 | |
adrian_smith | Guest80024: described here, http://swiftstack.com/blog/2012/09/27/top-three-swift-features-in-openstack-folsom/ | 20:36 |
Guest80024 | thx! | 20:36 |
notmyname | adrian_smith: thanks | 20:36 |
Guest80024 | there was some talk about dedup within swift... | 20:37 |
notmyname | so, anything else before we move on to the summit plans? (summit plans discussion should be short) | 20:37 |
Guest80024 | is that on anyone's radar? | 20:37 |
tongli | what do you mean by remove webob? | 20:37 |
notmyname | Guest80024: it's possible (anything's possible!) but probably unlikely | 20:37 |
notmyname | tongli: redbo has an outstanding patch to do so. basically, webob keeps breaking us with every version bump | 20:38 |
Guest80024 | there was a Msc dude in portogal that started circulating a proposal that got some traction on the ML | 20:38 |
notmyname | tongli: it's a pain to amange | 20:38 |
tongli | i c. I remember once that the HEAD operation failed. had to apply a patch. | 20:38 |
notmyname | tongli: and has annoying "magic properties" that do stuff when you don't expect it to (like content-type and charset setting) | 20:38 |
pandemicsyn | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/12186/ - swob | 20:39 |
notmyname | ok, summit plans | 20:39 |
notmyname | I hope you are all going to the summit, but I know some of you won't be there | 20:40 |
tongli | quite big change. so it will be merged? | 20:40 |
*** lloydde has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
notmyname | please submit your talk proposals at http://summit.openstack.org | 20:40 |
notmyname | you can also see what's currently proposed there | 20:40 |
Guest80024 | nexenta put out a detailed proposal for the dedup stuff.. not sure it ever went anywhere: http://etherpad.openstack.org/P9MMYSWE6U | 20:40 |
notmyname | We've got a swift track all day on monday (8 slots) and possibly 2 more slots on tuesday morning. The sessions are intendend to be for community feature dev work, but in the past we have also had talks on design overviews and in-depth discussions on how existing features work. | 20:40 |
notmyname | there are some additional workshop sessions that will cover some swift topics, so there should be some very good swift content at this summit | 20:41 |
notmyname | is anyone planning on submitting talks that hasn't done so already (we've only had 3 people submit talks so far) | 20:42 |
Guest80024 | can i float an idea here? | 20:42 |
notmyname | I'd like to see one from ogelbukh on the encryption. perhaps someone from rax or adrian_smith on CORS | 20:43 |
notmyname | Guest80024: sure | 20:43 |
Guest80024 | automatic ring adjustment for add/remove disks, with timed, gated adjustment of disk weights | 20:43 |
tongli | I would love to see someone talks about the ring generation in details and how we can make that automated in the future. | 20:43 |
tongli | @Guest80024, are we thinking about the same thing? | 20:43 |
Guest80024 | there are a few tools out there that do generation. | 20:44 |
Guest80024 | the problem is maintaining.... and adjusting to changes in available disks/servers | 20:44 |
notmyname | pandemicsyn: arent' you working on soemthing like that? the ring-server? | 20:44 |
judd7 | Guest80024: can you list some of those tools? | 20:44 |
ogelbukh | personally I won't be able to attend, but mirantis will do the talk about it | 20:44 |
tongli | yes, | 20:44 |
tongli | I would like to see a talk about ring and ring related session. | 20:44 |
notmyname | ogelbukh: cool. please try to get something on the summit page, even a placeholder ASAP | 20:44 |
pandemicsyn | notmyname: ring server just lets you add/remove/manage devices , doesn't manage rebalance/deployments | 20:45 |
ogelbukh | on the ring generation, we've done some things in puppet | 20:45 |
ogelbukh | based on current stuff but slightly modified | 20:45 |
zaitcev | http://swiftstack.com/blog/2012/04/09/swift-capacity-management/ says that SwiftStack's cluster management has "add gradually" mode | 20:45 |
judd7 | I did (in a previous life) ring management with chef+rundeck. It was cool. | 20:45 |
Guest80024 | I was talking about crowbar | 20:45 |
notmyname | tongli: we're doing a meetup in sunnyvale next week about that :-) | 20:45 |
Guest80024 | but it's not yet updated for the smarter folsom ring | 20:46 |
tongli | yeah, in Raleigh NC, can not attend. | 20:46 |
*** EmilienM has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
notmyname | Please go to your org and campaign for what is important to you. And bring other ideas to the summit. :-) | 20:46 |
Guest80024 | (and IRC is being stupid about letting me use my handle for some reason.. its aabes_) | 20:46 |
tongli | it will be nice to have some one write up something for a session not only about the ring in current implementation, but also look at the future and some options to improve | 20:46 |
notmyname | tongli: ya, we can look into something about that | 20:47 |
Guest80024 | if there's interest in having a discussion about my suggestion, I'll submit a summit session. | 20:47 |
tongli | great. | 20:47 |
notmyname | Guest80024: I'm interested. please submit it :-) | 20:47 |
notmyname | And now to the last item on the agenda: are there any outstanding concerns or questions about swift that I can answer or work on, on your behalf? | 20:47 |
Guest80024 | better deployment consideration documentation? | 20:48 |
zaitcev | notmyname: I added it to Etherpad - do you know if gholt is going to continue on Swiftly? | 20:48 |
notmyname | gholt: around and want to answer? | 20:48 |
pandemicsyn | zaitcev: not sure if gholt is around today (hes got bird flu or something) | 20:48 |
glange | notmyname: he's been out sick today | 20:49 |
notmyname | zaitcev: swiftly is a community or ecosystem thing | 20:49 |
pandemicsyn | but we use swiftly alot at $RAX | 20:49 |
zaitcev | I'm sick of the client CPU burn, so I was going to have a look. Not sure if it should go into python-swiftclient or perhaps he's already solved it. | 20:49 |
notmyname | zaitcev: ya, talks around the client certainly would be appropriate at the summit too | 20:49 |
Guest80024 | haven't looked recently - how's the swift support in fog? | 20:50 |
zaitcev | Not coming to Summit this time sadly | 20:50 |
*** scotticus has left #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
torgomatic | zaitcev: the client CPU burn can, in principle, be cleaned up provided that it doesn't have to run on Python <= 2.4 | 20:50 |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
zykes- | still swift meeting notmyname ? | 20:51 |
notmyname | zykes-: ya | 20:51 |
notmyname | 9 minutes left. anything I can address, either with swift or openstack-related? also, feel free to email me at me@not.mn | 20:52 |
creiht | notmyname: I may have another one, but I can't talk about it yet :) | 20:52 |
creiht | (summit talk) | 20:52 |
notmyname | creiht: cool | 20:52 |
swifterdarrell | zaitcev: torgomatic: I think I've fixed at least one Queue busy-waiting in python-swiftclient's swift | 20:52 |
notmyname | creiht: when will you be able to? | 20:52 |
Guest80024 | notmyname: fog support for swift? | 20:52 |
notmyname | Guest80024: I'm not a ruby dev, so I haven't kept up to date on fog support | 20:53 |
Guest80024 | just checked, doesn't seem to be there.. there's rax and s3 | 20:53 |
notmyname | Guest80024: RAX == swift | 20:53 |
Guest80024 | keystone auth? | 20:53 |
notmyname | assuming it let's you set the auth endpoint | 20:53 |
creiht | notmyname: be able to? | 20:53 |
zaitcev | swifterdarrell, I'll check if it's the same. I saw a problem with SSL enabled. | 20:53 |
creiht | I have an idea of something that I want to talk about, but have to run it by some people here first | 20:54 |
notmyname | creiht: able to talk about it | 20:54 |
*** AlanClark has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
notmyname | ok, let me knwo | 20:54 |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
creiht | ahh... it is probably best that I don't yet :) | 20:54 |
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:54 | |
notmyname | oh the suspense ;-) | 20:54 |
creiht | hah | 20:54 |
judd7 | We wont tell anyone. | 20:54 |
notmyname | ok, let's go ahead and wrap this up so that the next meeting can start | 20:54 |
briancline | don't worry, this definitely isn't logged | 20:55 |
swifterdarrell | zaitcev: may be unrelated--I was referring to CPU burn related to busy-waiting on threads/Queues; one place has been changed and as torgomatic pointed out, there are several left to fix | 20:55 |
*** dwalleck_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:55 | |
judd7 | Thanks notmyname, pandemicsyn | 20:55 |
swifterdarrell | zaitcev: but that's probably unrelated to something re: SSL? | 20:55 |
notmyname | Thanks for your time. We all work for different organizations. Please go to your org and campaign for what is important to you. And bring other ideas to the summit. Looking forward to seeing you there. | 20:55 |
notmyname | #endmeeting | 20:56 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack" | 20:56 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Mon Oct 1 20:56:03 2012 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 20:56 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift_community_meeting/2012/swift_community_meeting.2012-10-01-20.01.html | 20:56 |
ogelbukh | notmyname: thanks for the opportunity | 20:56 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift_community_meeting/2012/swift_community_meeting.2012-10-01-20.01.txt | 20:56 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift_community_meeting/2012/swift_community_meeting.2012-10-01-20.01.log.html | 20:56 |
ogelbukh | thanks everyone ) | 20:56 |
*** adrian_smith has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
*** dwalleck_ has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
*** redbo has left #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
*** zaitcev has left #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
*** dwalleck_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:57 | |
*** heckj has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
*** yuanz has left #openstack-meeting | 20:58 | |
*** dwalleck_ has quit IRC | 20:58 | |
*** colinnich has quit IRC | 20:58 | |
zykes- | danwent: are you alive or ? | 20:58 |
zykes- | wrong channel though but | 20:58 |
danwent | zykes-: i'm just busy. if you have a bug, best to use LP for that. | 20:59 |
*** glange has left #openstack-meeting | 20:59 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:00 | |
*** CrackerJackMack has left #openstack-meeting | 21:00 | |
danwent | hi folks… channel is looking a little dead today :) | 21:00 |
markmcclain | hi | 21:00 |
markvoelker | o/ | 21:00 |
salv-orlando | hi | 21:01 |
danwent | #startmeeting quantum | 21:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Mon Oct 1 21:01:05 2012 UTC. The chair is danwent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:01 |
amotoki | o/ | 21:01 |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'quantum' | 21:01 |
*** antoine1 has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
danwent | #link agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/Meetings | 21:01 |
danwent | should be a pretty short meeting today… I assume people are still recovering from the release :) | 21:01 |
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:01 | |
danwent | #info Quantum Folsom release is out! Congrats to the whole team! | 21:01 |
zykes- | danwent: or just hiding ;) | 21:02 |
nati_ueno | hi | 21:02 |
nati_ueno | Congrat! | 21:02 |
danwent | #info all bugs found that may be considered for backport to Folsom should be fixed in master and have the bug tagged with 'folsom-backport-potential' | 21:02 |
* markvoelker cheers | 21:02 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:02 | |
danwent | here is the current list: https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.tag=folsom-backport-potential | 21:02 |
*** Guest80024 has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
*** dfg_ has left #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
arosen | hi | 21:03 |
danwent | so far there is nothing i've seen of significant concern, so we'll hold off on a stable release until either a bunch of small things pop-up, or there is a major issue that we feel we need to address urgently. | 21:03 |
danwent | #help we're looking for people to help manage the stable/folsom branch and keep track of what fixes need to be back-ported, decide on timing of stable releases, etc. | 21:04 |
danwent | I believe rkukura or garyk worked on this in the past | 21:04 |
*** antoine1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:04 | |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
danwent | neither of them seem to be here today, but if others are interested in helping out as well, let me know. the more the merrier in my opinion. | 21:05 |
danwent | There was also a ton of great work that went into creating content for the openstack docs in the past week. | 21:05 |
danwent | I believe the major gaps we outlined have for the most part been closed. | 21:06 |
annegentle | nice job all! | 21:06 |
*** mtreinish has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
danwent | #info any remainning doc issues should be filed against the openstack-manuals project and tagged with 'quantum' (for the quantum admin guide) and 'netconn-api' for the API guide. | 21:06 |
*** mcohen has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:07 | |
danwent | here are the existing links: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bugs?field.tag=quantum | 21:07 |
danwent | https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bugs?field.tag=netconn-api | 21:07 |
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:07 | |
amotoki | what is the status of netconn-api? | 21:07 |
danwent | we'll want to be very vigilent that if someone asks something on the mailing list, and we can't answer by pointing to a section of either of those two docs, then we should probably be filing a bug to add that content to one of the guies. | 21:07 |
danwent | salv-orlando: ? | 21:08 |
*** pandemicsyn has left #openstack-meeting | 21:08 | |
salv-orlando | amotoki: we have a final patch in WIP for l3 extension | 21:08 |
salv-orlando | and then we still need to document the Quota extension | 21:08 |
amotoki | have you solved the problem in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/13299/? | 21:08 |
danwent | salv-orlando: can you create netconn-api bugs for those if there aren't already? | 21:08 |
salv-orlando | Apart from that, it is complete (pending bugs and errors that you guys might find) | 21:08 |
danwent | or rather openstack-manuals bugs, tagged with netconn-api | 21:08 |
salv-orlando | danwent: already created, probably not tagget | 21:08 |
danwent | ah, makes sense. | 21:09 |
salv-orlando | amotoki: should have been transient failure as this morning a patch dependent on this built fine. Let me do a recheck. | 21:09 |
danwent | Ok, any other topics to discuss on Folsom release or docs? | 21:09 |
ijw | Per what I said earlier today on the list, if there's not Python API stuff in the docs then there probably ought to be (I haven't looked at the Quantum docs specifically) | 21:09 |
amotoki | sound good. | 21:09 |
*** maurosr has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
danwent | ijw: i'm not sure what the right place for such content is. | 21:10 |
*** markvoelker1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:10 | |
ijw | Yeah, indeed. Not with the web API itself, I guess, but it ought to be somewhere. | 21:11 |
danwent | I want to keep the API spec relatively clean and focused on the rest calls. I assume you're looking for something that documents the python bindings? | 21:11 |
*** dwalleck has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
danwent | ijw: agreed... | 21:11 |
salv-orlando | danwent, ijw: looking at your email seems you're looking for developer docs | 21:11 |
*** antoine1 has left #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
danwent | well, there's two types of that salv-orlando | 21:11 |
danwent | one is for building quantum itself, and another is for calling its APIs, but via python bindings | 21:11 |
danwent | i thought ijw was talking about API bindings for python | 21:12 |
salv-orlando | I meant the second one - aimed at developers wishing to use quantum | 21:12 |
annegentle | all the colors of the rainbow developers :) Really just red (API) or blue (Python). | 21:12 |
annegentle | or the purple ones who are both | 21:12 |
ijw | I'm talking about the Python bindings - I think there should be a straightforward docstring extraction (assuming anyone gives the docstrings love when they write things) plus an explanation of how the API is used, and a pointer so that it can all be found. But I'll take what I can get ;) | 21:13 |
annegentle | ijw: I think the current problem your issue raises is that the docstrings are not getting love in certain projects - haven't examined quantum to know if they <3 docstrings | 21:14 |
danwent | I think the reality is that there is no documented, stable API other than the webservice API itself. | 21:14 |
ijw | annegentle: actually, there's the open question of whether they should be called at all - nothing says it's public | 21:14 |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
annegentle | ijw: and "public" is whether the endpoint is public (based on what the cloud provider deploys)? | 21:14 |
danwent | we could push for certain APIs within python-quantumclient to be those APIs, but at this point, I'm not aware of stabilitization promises around that. | 21:15 |
danwent | I think this is a good point though | 21:15 |
annegentle | ijw: or governed by policy (again from the cloud provider) | 21:15 |
amotoki | ijw: horizon/api/quantum.py is a good example if you want to know how to use python-quantumclient. | 21:15 |
ijw | 'Public' as in 'we expect to maintain compatibility' | 21:15 |
*** torgomatic has left #openstack-meeting | 21:15 | |
ijw | annegentle: since the Python bindings are relatively divorced from the web API you have to have some assurance that they're going to be stable. | 21:15 |
annegentle | ijw: ok, understood | 21:16 |
danwent | this might be a good topic for future discussion, as I agree that (a) there is potential value in a stable python API and (b) that we make no such promises at this point. | 21:16 |
danwent | ijw: do you want to discuss this @ summit? | 21:16 |
danwent | or simply create a BP around it if you don't think there's much to discuss | 21:16 |
ijw | Yes, and I don't think it's just a quantum thing, so a wider audience might be a good idea | 21:16 |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:17 | |
danwent | ijw: yeah, ideally we'd have consistency in terms of the behavior of these python APIs across projects. I suspect that is far from the case right now. | 21:17 |
*** aclark_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:17 | |
danwent | ijw: definitely consult with Yong on this too, as he created most of the latest rev of the client, I think. | 21:18 |
*** heckj has quit IRC | 21:18 | |
danwent | (he doesn't seem to be here today… post folsom vacation I guess) | 21:18 |
*** AlanClark has quit IRC | 21:18 | |
danwent | Ok, so moving on... | 21:18 |
salv-orlando | danwent: or probably finally enjoying the comfort of his bed at 5 in the morning :) | 21:18 |
danwent | perhaps :P | 21:19 |
danwent | #topic quantum tempest + gating | 21:19 |
*** openstack changes topic to "quantum tempest + gating" | 21:19 | |
danwent | I wanted to revive this discussion now that folsom is out. I think its probably the most important thing our team needs to be focused on now, so I wanted to figure out where we were, and what we needed to plan for at the summit | 21:19 |
danwent | mnewby nati_ueno any info? | 21:20 |
nati_ueno | Here is meeting log http://etherpad.openstack.org/quantum-tempest | 21:20 |
nati_ueno | We are discussing after openstack-qa meeting | 21:20 |
danwent | nati_ueno: ah, ok, there's another meeting coming up soon? when is that? | 21:21 |
danwent | i saw the existing tempest review expire, so I wasn't sure if people were still actively working on it. | 21:21 |
nati_ueno | It is not formal meeting | 21:21 |
nati_ueno | danwent: Ah sorry. I was in bussiness trip to Japan. So I haven't progressed the work yet. | 21:21 |
danwent | nati_ueno: can you work with mnewby, folks from tempest, and the CI team to make sure we have a session on this at the summit? | 21:22 |
nati_ueno | danwent: Sure | 21:22 |
danwent | we can put it on the quantum track and invite others | 21:22 |
nati_ueno | Great | 21:22 |
danwent | #todo nati_ueno create summit session around quantum tempest efforts + gating | 21:23 |
danwent | #topic grizzly summit | 21:23 |
*** openstack changes topic to "grizzly summit" | 21:23 | |
danwent | #info http://www.openstack.org/summit/san-diego-2012/ | 21:23 |
danwent | summit is two weeks away | 21:23 |
*** maoy has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
danwent | we will want session schedule finalized by early next week | 21:23 |
danwent | (well, sometimes individual slots change last minute, but our general set of topics should be set by then) | 21:24 |
danwent | #info quantum summit sessions are mon/tues/wed | 21:24 |
danwent | no sessions thurs | 21:24 |
danwent | #info to propose sessions, use: http://summit.openstack.org/ | 21:24 |
danwent | a couple reminders here, as people always go a bit crazy around summit time | 21:25 |
danwent | first, its not about who proposes a session first… if multiple people want to talk on the same topics, we'll commonly merge sessions one all sessions have been proposed | 21:25 |
danwent | we need a healthy balance of "community projects" vs. "shiny objects"… topics like system test, horizon integration, HA improvements, etc. are very important to average users | 21:26 |
danwent | as I mentioned before, we really need to focus on system test/ tempest + gating. to me this is the biggest gap for us right now. | 21:27 |
danwent | one particular "shiny object" that peopel are already creating a lot of content around is "load-balancer-as-a-service" | 21:27 |
danwent | #info content for load-balancer as a service discuss is being put here: http://wiki.openstack.org/Quantum/LBaaS | 21:28 |
danwent | feel free to add your own thoughts | 21:28 |
*** markvoelker1 has quit IRC | 21:28 | |
salv-orlando | I would also add "do not refresh the web page after submitting a session" :) | 21:28 |
*** markvoelker1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:28 | |
amotoki | I made a mistake already :-( | 21:29 |
danwent | over the past few months I've been keeping a list of good community topics… i'll send out an email with those items. | 21:29 |
danwent | I'll be asking people to organize sessions around many of those topics. | 21:29 |
*** devananda has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
danwent | any other questions/comments on summit proposals? | 21:29 |
zykes- | danwent: which one of the lbaas projects is it? the mirantis one or ? | 21:30 |
nati_ueno | I would like to propose quantum-scheduler session | 21:30 |
danwent | zykes-: there are several different proposals for lbaas, all on that page. | 21:30 |
nati_ueno | It may be merged to HA session | 21:30 |
danwent | nati_ueno: sure, just propose session for now, and we'll figure out what sessions may make sense to merge once that is done. | 21:31 |
nati_ueno | danwent: I got it | 21:31 |
danwent | #topic open discussion | 21:31 |
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion" | 21:31 | |
danwent | any other comments/questions? or will this be the shortest meeting ever? :) | 21:31 |
danwent | ok, that's a wrap. thanks folks. look for email about community topics for the summit | 21:32 |
danwent | we'll finalize the list early next week. | 21:32 |
danwent | #endmeeting | 21:32 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack" | 21:32 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Mon Oct 1 21:32:48 2012 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 21:32 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/quantum/2012/quantum.2012-10-01-21.01.html | 21:32 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/quantum/2012/quantum.2012-10-01-21.01.txt | 21:32 |
salv-orlando | bye | 21:32 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/quantum/2012/quantum.2012-10-01-21.01.log.html | 21:32 |
nati_ueno | TTYL! | 21:32 |
danwent | world record time :) | 21:32 |
markmcclain | later | 21:32 |
mestery | later folks! | 21:32 |
danwent | bye! | 21:33 |
amotoki | thank folks! | 21:33 |
markvoelker1 | Night all! | 21:33 |
*** markvoelker1 has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:34 | |
*** hemna_ has quit IRC | 21:34 | |
*** amotoki has left #openstack-meeting | 21:34 | |
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:35 | |
*** Vinay has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:35 | |
*** Vinay is now known as Guest60829 | 21:35 | |
*** Guest60829 has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
*** mcohen has left #openstack-meeting | 21:38 | |
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
*** vbannai has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:39 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:40 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:40 | |
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:44 | |
*** dwalleck has left #openstack-meeting | 21:45 | |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:47 | |
*** dwalleck_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:47 | |
*** rnirmal has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
*** amotoki has left #openstack-meeting | 21:49 | |
*** blamar_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:50 | |
*** blamar has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
*** blamar_ is now known as blamar | 21:50 | |
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:50 | |
*** ijw1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:55 | |
*** huats has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:56 | |
*** huats has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:56 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
*** sudorandom has left #openstack-meeting | 22:01 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:02 | |
*** gholt has left #openstack-meeting | 22:02 | |
*** dwalleck_ has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 22:07 | |
*** salmon_ has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
*** dwcramer has quit IRC | 22:10 | |
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
*** aclark_ has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:17 | |
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:20 | |
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:20 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 22:24 | |
*** milner has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:29 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 22:35 | |
*** Gordonz_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:37 | |
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:38 | |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
*** rkukura has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting | 22:41 | |
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 22:44 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:46 | |
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:46 | |
*** spligak has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
*** dkehn is now known as dkehn_away | 22:48 | |
*** cdub has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:50 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
*** blamar has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:01 | |
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:02 | |
*** mattray has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:11 | |
*** huats has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:17 | |
*** huats has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:17 | |
*** gatuus has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
*** shang has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
*** lloydde has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
*** hemna has quit IRC | 23:34 | |
*** vbannai has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 23:42 | |
*** colinmcnamara1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:42 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
*** reed has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
*** colinmcnamara1 has quit IRC | 23:47 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!