*** ncode has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:25 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:28 | |
*** ncode has quit IRC | 00:30 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:43 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:02 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 01:19 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 01:24 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:25 | |
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:07 | |
*** anderstj has quit IRC | 02:23 | |
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:28 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 02:42 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:43 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:43 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:44 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 02:54 | |
*** dtroyer is now known as dtroyer_zzz | 03:00 | |
*** dtroyer_zzz is now known as dtroyer | 03:04 | |
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:09 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:15 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:15 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:43 | |
*** shang has quit IRC | 04:19 | |
*** dtroyer is now known as dtroyer_zzz | 04:34 | |
*** dtroyer_zzz is now known as dtroyer | 04:47 | |
*** garyk has quit IRC | 04:51 | |
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:25 | |
*** garyk has quit IRC | 05:53 | |
*** dtroyer is now known as dtroyer_zzz | 06:11 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 06:27 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:32 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 06:42 | |
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:20 | |
*** ghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:33 | |
*** ghe is now known as GheRivero | 07:33 | |
*** bencherian has quit IRC | 07:38 | |
*** anderstj has quit IRC | 07:39 | |
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:56 | |
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:20 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 08:24 | |
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:39 | |
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:40 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 08:44 | |
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec | 08:44 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 08:54 | |
*** GheRivero has quit IRC | 10:15 | |
*** ghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:18 | |
*** ghe has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:41 | |
*** ghe has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:47 | |
*** ghe is now known as GheRivero | 10:49 | |
*** milner has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:11 | |
*** hggdh has quit IRC | 11:34 | |
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:34 | |
*** hggdh has quit IRC | 11:37 | |
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:38 | |
*** darraghb has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** uvirtbot has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** jgriffith_away has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** chmouel has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** justinsb has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** nikhil has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** ameade has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** pballand has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** ttrifonov has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** uvirtbot has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** jgriffith_away has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** chmouel has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** justinsb has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** ttrifonov has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** uvirtbot has quit IRC | 12:12 | |
*** uvirtbot has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:12 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** darraghb has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** jgriffith_away has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** chmouel has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** justinsb has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** nikhil has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** ameade has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** pballand has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** ttrifonov has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** jgriffith_away has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** chmouel has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** justinsb has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** ttrifonov has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:23 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:31 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 12:32 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:33 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:34 | |
*** GheRivero has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:53 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
*** jgriffith_away is now known as jgriffith | 12:57 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:00 | |
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
*** davidkranz_ is now known as davidkranz | 13:02 | |
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:16 | |
*** jgriffith has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:19 | |
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:24 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:25 | |
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:37 | |
*** oubiwann has quit IRC | 13:37 | |
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:37 | |
*** dtroyer_zzz is now known as dtroyer | 13:45 | |
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:06 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:11 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 14:14 | |
*** dendro-a` is now known as dendrobates | 14:15 | |
*** dtroyer is now known as dtroyer_zzz | 14:18 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:23 | |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:23 | |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:24 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:24 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:28 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:28 | |
*** flaviamissi has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:30 | |
*** Dr_Who has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:33 | |
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:33 | |
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:34 | |
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:37 | |
*** anderstj has quit IRC | 14:37 | |
*** blamar has quit IRC | 14:37 | |
*** dtroyer_zzz is now known as dtroyer | 14:38 | |
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:39 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:41 | |
*** mat___ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:56 | |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:12 | |
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:12 | |
*** joearnold has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
*** hggdh has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:18 | |
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:19 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 15:20 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 15:20 | |
*** dendrobates has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:20 | |
*** joearnold has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
*** mat___ has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
*** lzyeval has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:34 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:38 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 15:40 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 15:44 | |
*** PotHix has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:46 | |
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:47 | |
*** PotHix has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
*** littleidea_ is now known as littleidea | 15:52 | |
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:54 | |
*** oubiwann1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:58 | |
*** oubiwann has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
*** oubiwann1 has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
*** oubiwann has quit IRC | 16:00 | |
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
*** PotHix has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:01 | |
*** garyk has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:02 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:02 | |
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:07 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:20 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 16:24 | |
*** zvm-vlam has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
*** DuncanT has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
*** DuncanT has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:31 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
*** garyk has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
*** lzyeval has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
*** zvm-vlam has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:43 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:50 | |
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:55 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 16:57 | |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:59 | |
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:59 | |
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:00 | |
*** johnpur has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
*** derekh has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** darraghb has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:04 | |
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:14 | |
*** GheRivero has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:18 | |
*** dtroyer is now known as dtroyer_zzz | 17:20 | |
*** dtroyer_zzz is now known as dtroyer | 17:31 | |
*** patelna has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:31 | |
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:38 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:44 | |
*** joearnold has quit IRC | 17:50 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:55 | |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:03 | |
*** johnpur has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:04 | |
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:18 | |
*** jakedahn_zz is now known as jakedahn | 18:21 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 18:22 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 18:23 | |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:23 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:24 | |
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:25 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 18:30 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 18:31 | |
*** anderstj_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:32 | |
*** anderstj has quit IRC | 18:32 | |
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:33 | |
*** anderstj_ has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
*** anderstj_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:34 | |
*** oubiwann has quit IRC | 18:37 | |
*** anderstj has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:43 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
*** heckj has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 18:59 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:06 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:07 | |
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 19:10 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 19:12 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:13 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:15 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 19:16 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has quit IRC | 19:18 | |
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-afk | 19:20 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:25 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:26 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:32 | |
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz | 19:36 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 19:37 | |
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:40 | |
*** Guest67996 has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
*** Kiall has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:43 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:45 | |
*** Kiall has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
*** Kiall has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:52 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
*** heckj has quit IRC | 19:56 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:01 | |
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:04 | |
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:07 | |
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:08 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec | 20:08 | |
*** johnpur has left #openstack-meeting | 20:09 | |
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:10 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 20:13 | |
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 20:18 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:18 | |
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:19 | |
*** dhellmann_ has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:20 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 20:21 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 20:22 | |
*** GheRivero has quit IRC | 20:22 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:24 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has left #openstack-meeting | 20:25 | |
*** bencherian has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:29 | |
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:30 | |
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:31 | |
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
*** littleidea_ has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:39 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 20:41 | |
*** littleidea_ is now known as littleidea | 20:41 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:47 | |
*** markvoelker1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:47 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:48 | |
*** gongys has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:49 | |
*** zhuadl has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:53 | |
*** shivh has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:55 | |
*** jjm3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:58 | |
gongys | hello | 20:58 |
---|---|---|
markvoelker1 | o/ | 20:58 |
danwent | hi | 20:58 |
markmcclain | hi | 20:58 |
shivh | hi | 20:58 |
markmcclain | danwent: I figured you'd be out partying | 20:58 |
markvoelker1 | AH, there he is...was wondering if danwent was too busy celebrating to meet today. =) Congrats Dan. | 20:58 |
danwent | thanks guys… yeah, been a little crazy around here. | 20:59 |
zhuadl | hi:-) | 20:59 |
danwent | kind of getting bombarded :) | 21:00 |
mestery | o/ | 21:00 |
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:00 | |
* mestery thinks danwent should be buying beers at the next Summit. | 21:00 | |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:00 | |
SumitNaiksatam | hi! | 21:00 |
danwent | #startmeeting | 21:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Mon Jul 23 21:00:47 2012 UTC. The chair is danwent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:00 |
danwent | #linkn agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/Meetings | 21:01 |
garyk | hi | 21:01 |
salv-orlando | Hi all! | 21:01 |
danwent | ok, two weeks from when major branches should be proposed for F-3 | 21:01 |
danwent | three weeks total | 21:01 |
rkukura | hi everyoone | 21:01 |
danwent | starting this week, i'll bug people who haven't posted full specs (including myself!) for major features | 21:02 |
PotHix | o/ | 21:02 |
amotoki | Hi! | 21:02 |
gongys | ok. be ready to be bugged. | 21:02 |
danwent | here are working items: https://launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/folsom-3 | 21:02 |
danwent | biggest roadblock to clear out is agreement on rpc/notifications stuff for non-polling | 21:03 |
danwent | which we'll talk about later in the meeting. | 21:03 |
danwent | progress on v2 plugins seems to be moving forward well, which is great. | 21:03 |
*** edgarmagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
danwent | and we have people working on quantum + horizon, which is awesome. | 21:03 |
edgarmagana | hi all | 21:03 |
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
*** heckj has quit IRC | 21:04 | |
danwent | in terms of key reviews.... | 21:04 |
danwent | rkukura: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9069/6 | 21:04 |
danwent | provider networks | 21:04 |
danwent | looks like your new plugin stuff just got merged, congrats. | 21:04 |
rkukura | phase one should be ready for hopefully final review later today | 21:04 |
danwent | yup, looks close | 21:04 |
rkukura | I would like feedback on my attribute authorization proposal | 21:04 |
danwent | rkukura: yes, saw email. haven't had a chance to read yet though. | 21:05 |
rkukura | If its acceptable, I'll include that in this patch set | 21:05 |
zhuadl | yes, CRD of network/subnet/ports in sys panel works now. | 21:05 |
salv-orlando | I think the provider networks were already in good shape, rebasing after changes in the ext framework should make its approval piece of cake | 21:05 |
danwent | zhuadl: great. i'm super excited about the progress on horizon | 21:05 |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 21:05 | |
*** chuck_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:05 | |
danwent | zhuadl: do you want to send a link out the ML once you think its ready for testing? | 21:05 |
zhuadl | sure | 21:06 |
danwent | zhuadl: by sys panel, do you mean for admin users but not regular users? | 21:06 |
zhuadl | yes, the user panel is in progress. | 21:06 |
danwent | zhuadl: ok, i will try to test sys panel, i think i was testing user panel before | 21:06 |
danwent | I also wanted to call out the reviews for gongys's notifications stuff and garyk's rpc plugin work. | 21:06 |
danwent | reviews are up for that, and I'd really like to wrap up any design discussion at the meeting today, as I don't want to slow you two down on making progress. | 21:07 |
garyk | danwent: notifications | 21:07 |
gongys | regarding notification, we have to thing about where to put our configuraiton items. | 21:08 |
garyk | danwent, gongys: 2 issues here. 1. configuration files and what to notify | 21:08 |
danwent | ok, going a bit out of agenda order, but let's roll with it. | 21:08 |
danwent | :) | 21:08 |
*** zul has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
garyk | roll with the punches - dope on a rope :) | 21:08 |
danwent | Moving on to Discussion Topics, we'll talk about the notifications / rpc | 21:09 |
garyk | configuration files - do we want to merge and have 1 file or stick with the current model. | 21:09 |
gongys | I have no clear idea yet. | 21:09 |
danwent | garyk: it seemed strange that someone would have to configure the same rpc/message-queue stuff in multiple files, but I don't really have much experience with it, so I'd defer to others. | 21:09 |
danwent | i'd like to identify all key blockers in this meeting though, as I feel like we're a bit stuck on a lot of items until we do. | 21:10 |
danwent | garyk: what is your opinion on this? | 21:10 |
garyk | danwent: not sure if this is in multiple files. it is either in quantum.conf or xxx-plugin.ini. | 21:10 |
garyk | danwent: i think that we need summit for this one. he wanted to keep these separate for the cisoc plugins | 21:11 |
danwent | but if we have multiple agents (e.g., dhcp, l3, plugin), woudln't they all need those values? | 21:11 |
SumitNaiksatam | i am here | 21:11 |
danwent | garyk: sorry, who is "he"? | 21:11 |
danwent | SumitNaiksatam: ? | 21:11 |
garyk | danwent: yes | 21:12 |
*** chuck_ has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
SumitNaiksatam | we prefer that the plugin specific conf should be in a different conf file | 21:12 |
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:12 | |
garyk | danwent: i guess you are right. with multiple plugins it does seem logical. | 21:12 |
danwent | garyk: are you talking about generally whether plugin config should be collapse, or specifically about rpc/message-queue config? I was just talking about the latter. | 21:12 |
garyk | danwent: the latter | 21:13 |
nati_ueno | I'm implemanting multiple plugin, some configuration looks conflict because some plugin are suing same configuration key | 21:13 |
garyk | danwent: it means that agents will need to load the qunatum.conf file. i am ok with this. it will make life simpler a bit | 21:13 |
PotHix | +1 for different configurations per plugin | 21:13 |
danwent | garyk: that is my feeling as well, but i'm happy to defer to you on this. | 21:14 |
danwent | the most important thing is that we make a decision and move forward | 21:15 |
garyk | danwent: i am good with the agent also reading quantum.conf. any objections? | 21:15 |
salv-orlando | I am probably naive, but I reckon that if plugins can be developed independently then they should have separate namespaces for configuration | 21:15 |
danwent | garyk: i'm happy with that. | 21:16 |
nati_ueno | +1 for quantum.conf | 21:16 |
markmcclain | +1 for different configs | 21:16 |
salv-orlando | but they should all be able to read quantum.conf as well | 21:16 |
gongys | But the notification and rpc will have many items about 20. | 21:16 |
gongys | we have to duplicate them in all of the plugin files. | 21:16 |
danwent | gongys: yeah, that was my concern as well. | 21:17 |
nati_ueno | salv-orlando : reading quantu.conf is simple | 21:17 |
garyk | gongys: if the agent reads quantum.conf + its own file then we are good. allcommon stuff in quantum.conf. | 21:17 |
danwent | I think assuming that plugins can all read quantum.conf for non-plugin specific config if reasonable. | 21:17 |
zhuadl | we'd better figure out all the items and then see where to put in, I think. | 21:17 |
SumitNaiksatam | i agree | 21:17 |
garyk | in fact the common config enables us to read multiple files - this is done by the plugin on the service | 21:17 |
gongys | to require plugin agent to read both quantum.conf and plugin.ini file will complicate the install. | 21:18 |
gongys | of agent. | 21:18 |
salv-orlando | I agree. But I would pose the problem in terms of namespaces rather than one or multiple files. There's a common namespace every plugin and agent can access, and then there are plugin specific and agent specific namespaces. | 21:18 |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 21:18 | |
salv-orlando | If we then map namespaces to files, then that's a viable solution | 21:18 |
garyk | why shoukd it complicate things? | 21:18 |
danwent | salv-orlando: ok, that makes sense. | 21:18 |
PotHix | Namespaces is a good idea IMHO | 21:18 |
gongys | garyk: We will have to say that copy the quantum.conf and plugin.ini to xx dir instead of current guide which just requires copy plugin.ini file. | 21:19 |
salv-orlando | PotHix: I have a suspect our current configuration infrastructure does not handle namespaces, but that's a technical issue we can handle offline. | 21:20 |
danwent | packaging should take care of that, no? | 21:20 |
nati_ueno | IMO, table-name should use namespace also | 21:20 |
danwent | ok, we seem to have stumbled on a mine field here :) | 21:20 |
garyk | can someone please elaborate on the namespacing? | 21:20 |
salv-orlando | that the moment when we typically decide to go back to the ML, but at least let's agree on a direction | 21:20 |
danwent | garyk: I consider you master of all things config, due to the work here. can you sum this up and express your preference? | 21:21 |
PotHix | agree | 21:21 |
salv-orlando | garyk: I apologise I should not have mentioned that word. | 21:21 |
rkukura | By "namespaces" do we mean the "[DEFAULT]" and "[QUOTAS]" section headers in the current config file? | 21:21 |
danwent | if we still have disagreement, let's agree about what we disagree on, and take it offline. | 21:21 |
zhuadl | agree :-) | 21:22 |
garyk | danwent: i can write a mail tomorrow and hopeully we can debate the issue | 21:22 |
danwent | garyk: ok, yeah, forgot how it is for you. | 21:22 |
salv-orlando | exactly. on the namespace thing let's say that from my point of view each file is a distinct namespace and [default] or [quotas] are subsections of a given namespace. So multiple files will work in model | 21:22 |
danwent | if you feel you haven't had a chance to make your comments on config files known, please ping garyk | 21:22 |
danwent | (via email, is probably best) | 21:22 |
danwent | Ok, garyk, so config file were one of the big issues. what was the other? | 21:23 |
garyk | salv-orlando: ok, that makes sense. one limitation is enforcing it | 21:23 |
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:23 | |
garyk | danwent: items 2 is what exactly should be notified. | 21:23 |
salv-orlando | garyk: that's what I regard as the "technical" problem to tackle offline | 21:23 |
danwent | garyk: you mean whether the data can be passed in the notification? | 21:23 |
rkukura | Then config file names should be orthogonal to the section/variable naming or else we are locking in a very specific implementation. | 21:24 |
garyk | danwent: i just need a few seconds to write... | 21:24 |
gongys | current notificaton event is create/update/delete of net/subnet/port. | 21:24 |
danwent | garyk: k, go ahead | 21:24 |
garyk | danwent, gingys: these are notifications for billing etc. they should also include failures in the operations - for example an port not defined | 21:25 |
danwent | garyk: ah, ok, now i understand what you're getting at | 21:25 |
garyk | dantwent: these are not notifications to notify an agent that is should do something. does this make sense | 21:25 |
garyk | danwent: we are mixing different features. | 21:26 |
zhuadl | these are kind of events? | 21:26 |
danwent | garyk: well, i'm still not convinced, but not enough that its worth slowing things down for F-3, so i'm putting my concerns aside. | 21:26 |
gongys | Garyk: we have start/end for each event. | 21:27 |
danwent | garyk: on notification for failures, I think it depends on what your goals are for notifications. | 21:27 |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
garyk | danwent: it should not slow things down at all. i am cool with gonys changes. just the minor issue of the error flows that need to be treated. | 21:27 |
garyk | gongys: what if there is a start and no end. how do you explain this? | 21:27 |
gongys | so for port not defined can be expressed by no end ejected. | 21:28 |
gongys | Our log.debug is used to log error or exceptions. | 21:29 |
garyk | gongys: i find it odd if someone is writing a monitoring application how it will treat cases when a create event has taken place and then no completion. | 21:29 |
danwent | garyk: i think the big question is whether this notification framework is intended for external monitoring/troubleshooting | 21:29 |
gongys | monitor should care about end more than begin. | 21:30 |
danwent | if so, i agree that errors probably should be included. If the intial version is targeted more for things like billing, perhaps not. | 21:30 |
garyk | danwent: i would assume billing | 21:30 |
nati_uen_ | Notification is for external monitoring/troubleshooting in Nova | 21:30 |
nati_uen_ | So quantum should be same | 21:30 |
danwent | nati_uen_: do we know how nova notifications handle API errors? | 21:30 |
garyk | if it is troubleshooting then it mus include all paths | 21:30 |
nati_uen_ | In nova error is also included. It is configurable by flag value | 21:30 |
nati_uen_ | Yes I was working on that | 21:30 |
nati_uen_ | Nova's exception class is doing that | 21:31 |
danwent | nati_uen_: good to know. | 21:31 |
shivh | Not sure what is start and end of event. Events are instantanious, they dont have start and end. Tasks have start and end. | 21:31 |
nati_uen_ | See https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/exception.py#L116 | 21:31 |
danwent | gongys: are you opposed to adding the notification capability in line with what nova does? | 21:32 |
danwent | (i'll completely admit I have no familiarity with what nova does) | 21:32 |
danwent | or perhaps someone else could work on it as a follow-up commit? | 21:32 |
gongys | not very. I am just thinking we already have LOg.debug, why we deal with troubleshooting by notification? | 21:32 |
zhuadl | me too | 21:33 |
nati_uen_ | troubleshooting could be done by automatically | 21:33 |
danwent | gongys: i had the same opinion to start. I think the difference is whether it is an admin monitoring (in which case log files are enough), vs. an tenant application monitoring. | 21:33 |
nati_uen_ | But debug log has no json structure. | 21:34 |
danwent | nati_uen_: that's a good point as well. | 21:34 |
gongys | anyway, not all of openstack have such agreement to use notification to do troubleshooting. | 21:34 |
gongys | to Do the same role with LOG.debug() | 21:35 |
danwent | ok, so gongys, up to you as to whether you want to put it in the initial patch. sounds like others would be happy to extend you patch once its merged. | 21:35 |
danwent | does that seem like a reasonable compromise? or are people fundementally opposed to using notifications for failures ala nova? | 21:35 |
nati_uen_ | LOG.debug is for development. We will disable it when we do real operation | 21:35 |
garyk | nati_uen_: i agree | 21:35 |
gongys | Yes. I agree. I will push my first initial patch. | 21:35 |
danwent | ok, sounds good. | 21:36 |
danwent | garyk: any other items you feel are blockers in this area? | 21:36 |
garyk | gongys: +1 | 21:36 |
nati_uen_ | gongys: +1 | 21:36 |
danwent | we're running a bit low on time, but I want to make sure we clear things out. | 21:36 |
garyk | danwent: only the summer heat :). | 21:36 |
danwent | hehe… no kidding. I stay at the office b/c it has AC. | 21:36 |
danwent | ok, gongys, i believe you wanted to confirm that we are ok with names being non-unique and optional. | 21:37 |
gongys | yes. | 21:37 |
danwent | I think garyk has waived his concerns on this front | 21:37 |
danwent | but I wanted to confnirm | 21:37 |
danwent | garyk: ? | 21:38 |
danwent | (maybe he fell asleep.. sounds like agreement to me! j/k) | 21:38 |
garyk | danwent: i tried to follow all of the mails on the list. i am ok with whatever is decided | 21:38 |
zhuadl | hehe:D | 21:38 |
danwent | ok, thanks. gongys, i think you're cleared for take-off on that. | 21:39 |
danwent | salv-orlando: did you want to comment on terminology around the "public networks" stuff? | 21:39 |
garyk | i think that the plane has already landed - he just needs to park | 21:39 |
danwent | that's the last roadblock i wanted to clear today | 21:39 |
*** dwcramer has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
gongys | and what about the 'quantum net-create' command if we manke the network name optional too. | 21:39 |
gongys | ? | 21:39 |
garyk | danwet: rpc | 21:39 |
salv-orlando | yes | 21:39 |
garyk | gongys: it was a complement - you have alreday done the work. :) | 21:40 |
danwent | sorry salv-orlando let's pause and wrap up gongys's question. | 21:40 |
gongys | Do we remove the required argument too. | 21:40 |
gongys | ? | 21:40 |
*** reed has quit IRC | 21:40 | |
danwent | gongys: yes, I think consistency across all entities makes sense. | 21:40 |
danwent | garyk: ok, let's circle back on rpc after salv-orlando talks about public networks. | 21:40 |
shivh | Is name optional when creating a VM | 21:40 |
gongys | ok, I will allow 'quantum net-create' to create a network without any argument input. | 21:41 |
garyk | ok, sorry | 21:41 |
danwent | shivh: not sure if its optional its definitely not unique. | 21:41 |
shivh | If we want consisteny then it should match VM and Volume creation? | 21:41 |
danwent | shivh: are names mandatory there? | 21:42 |
danwent | I don't feel really strongly on mandatory vs. non-mandatory. | 21:42 |
danwent | i think the point was just that once a name is not unique, its really just a label for display purposes, and thus if there's no need for a display name, it should be optional. | 21:42 |
salv-orlando | I have a corollary question on client-side behavior for the name parameter (bugu979527), but will happy to discuss in open discussion time. | 21:42 |
danwent | salv-orlando: yes please, as were already running late | 21:43 |
salv-orlando | I meant bug 979527 - meetbot do your job :) | 21:43 |
uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 979527 in python-quantumclient "quantum-client does not support network lookup by label" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/979527 | 21:43 |
salv-orlando | ok, moving forward | 21:43 |
danwent | salv-orlando: want to comment on public networks stuff? | 21:43 |
salv-orlando | the terminology is probably the last blocker before I take the WIP out of the branch, which I believe contains a solution for addressing the attribute-authorization issues raised by rkukura. So I invite you to look at that branch. | 21:43 |
shivh | I'll take a back seat on that unique/optional in network. | 21:43 |
danwent | shivh: ok :) please ping gongys, and if you can convince him, you win :) | 21:44 |
salv-orlando | The concern we received on the proposed name, public, is that it is unclear to what public refers to | 21:44 |
salv-orlando | it might be confused with "the Internet" or "public access" | 21:44 |
danwent | yeah, i think that's valid | 21:44 |
rkukura | salv-orlando: I'll followup on the list to clarify whether your mechanism can do what provider-network needs for authorization. If so, I'll use it, and maybe we can merge what I've got for now until yours is in. | 21:44 |
shivh | I want to clarify when we talk about network type - what are we refering to? | 21:45 |
salv-orlando | similarly, I personally believe network-type can be confused as well with the particular technology that network use. | 21:45 |
shivh | public/pvt or stuff like L2/L3? | 21:45 |
danwent | shivh: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-v2-public-networks | 21:45 |
danwent | see link to full specification | 21:45 |
shivh | ok. | 21:46 |
salv-orlando | rkukura: sounds cool. Happy to discuss online. Surely, by merging we'll be able to address a larger set of use cases | 21:46 |
danwent | shivh: i agree though, a notion of "type" can be very ambiguous | 21:46 |
danwent | ok folks, 15 minutes left | 21:46 |
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:46 | |
nati_uen_ | I wanna discuss about multi-host implementation also | 21:46 |
danwent | nati_uen_: please wait until open discussion for non-agenda items | 21:47 |
salv-orlando | So, I think we need an attribute whose name characterize how it can be shared. Ance hence the name could be really "shared" | 21:47 |
nati_uen_ | danwent: Sorry I got it | 21:47 |
salv-orlando | with "ALL" or "None" (default) as a starter | 21:47 |
salv-orlando | with a model that we can then extend during the grizzly release cycle to allow more fine-grained control. Think about different levels of authorizations for owner, "group", and "world" | 21:48 |
danwent | salv-orlando: i think the appreoach of phrasing it as a type of sharing with limited options to start makes sense. | 21:48 |
danwent | "all" or "none" doesn't seem super intuitive to me, but we can bicker about exact terms later :) | 21:48 |
salv-orlando | In theory I would use a bit mask as you do for an in ode! | 21:49 |
salv-orlando | inode | 21:49 |
danwent | mmm… might be an interesting way to think about it. | 21:49 |
*** Dr_Who has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
*** arosen has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
danwent | ok, so are people generally inline with the approach of not calling them public, but rather having a "sharing" attribute, with two values to start in Folsom: "all"/"global" and "none"/"private"? | 21:50 |
danwent | module the details of naming | 21:50 |
salv-orlando | the public network would be a 644 permission mask on the network object as an example | 21:50 |
rkukura | danwent: +1 | 21:51 |
nati_uen_ | +1 for 644 | 21:51 |
danwent | mmm… for unix folks, that is a fairly intuitive way of describing it. | 21:51 |
danwent | ok, its official, i like it :) | 21:51 |
salv-orlando | 644? | 21:51 |
danwent | yeah | 21:51 |
nati_uen_ | salv-orlando: +1 for unix way :) | 21:51 |
gongys | My god, I have to count bit again. | 21:51 |
garyk | +1 - 777 | 21:51 |
danwent | or at least, letting people think of it in a unix-like way | 21:52 |
danwent | probably not suing actual numbers though :) | 21:52 |
salv-orlando | yeah but the "group" bit mask does not yet make any sense, so let's leave it ignored at the moment | 21:52 |
*** shivh has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
danwent | ok, sounds good. | 21:52 |
nati_uen_ | quantum net-chmod 0777 public-network | 21:52 |
danwent | ok, last topic, garyk, blockers on rpc? | 21:52 |
*** shivh has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:53 | |
garyk | danwent: nope - jut syncing it with all of the agents. | 21:53 |
danwent | garyk: ok, reviewed it this morning. no big concerns though, other than the config stuff | 21:53 |
danwent | ok, 6 minutes left | 21:54 |
danwent | moving on to... | 21:54 |
garyk | danwent: cool. inpr from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9591/ would be great | 21:54 |
danwent | #topic open-discussion | 21:54 |
*** openstack changes topic to "open-discussion" | 21:54 | |
garyk | that is 1km for us slow runners | 21:54 |
danwent | garyk: did you not get my comments this morning? | 21:54 |
danwent | ok, open discussion? | 21:55 |
shivh | Just a thought/idea, all this stuff looks like a file system, Type: directory/special file Scope: Permissions, name/inodes: name/UUID | 21:55 |
nati_uen_ | May I discuss multi-host? | 21:55 |
garyk | danwent: i'll double check. hadnetworking issues today | 21:55 |
gongys | let's talk abut multi-host | 21:56 |
danwent | garyk: ok. | 21:56 |
shivh | sorry lost ability to transmit for some time..(will take up my point in ML) | 21:56 |
danwent | nati_uen_: go ahead | 21:56 |
nati_uen_ | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihost-dhcp | 21:56 |
danwent | shivh: ok. logs of the meeting are posted as well. | 21:56 |
nati_uen_ | I'm thinking about how to design it | 21:56 |
*** patelna_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:56 | |
nati_uen_ | It needed scheduing function such as quantum-schduler | 21:56 |
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:57 | |
danwent | nati_uen_: this sounds like a complex question. can you ask it on ML? | 21:57 |
nati_uen_ | But it looks big for F3, so I wrote another design | 21:57 |
nati_uen_ | I got it | 21:57 |
salv-orlando | shivh: I think you'll find out in the logs the consensus is pretty much along the lines of your idea | 21:57 |
danwent | nati_uen_: sorry, but we're running out of time. | 21:57 |
nati_uen_ | danwent: NP :) | 21:58 |
danwent | one last comment I wanted to make was that, in case you haven't heard, vmware announced plans to acquire nicira today. | 21:58 |
danwent | vmware actually mentioned openstack as one of the reasons they were excited about working with nicira | 21:58 |
nati_uen_ | Congrat! You can buy Tesra also | 21:58 |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
edgarmagana | dan: plans to acquire? I think that was a deal done! :-) | 21:58 |
danwent | so I think things with Nicira's contributions to Quantum (and OVS) shoudl stay on track | 21:58 |
PotHix | Me too | 21:58 |
gongys | Good news. | 21:59 |
danwent | if any of you, or others within your company have concerns, I'm happy to chat with them. | 21:59 |
garyk | danwent, salv-orlando: congratulations | 21:59 |
danwent | thanks guys. | 21:59 |
s0mik | Congratulations Team Quantum on being at the strategic angle for future of networking! | 21:59 |
danwent | edgarmagana: its like buying a house… its never "done" :P | 21:59 |
edgarmagana | yeah.. congratulations folks! | 21:59 |
zhuadl | congrats! | 21:59 |
PotHix | Congrats! :) | 21:59 |
mestery | edgarmagana: :) | 21:59 |
danwent | anyway, wanted to just mention that as a few people have pinged me with concerns | 21:59 |
danwent | ok, anything else people wanted to bring up? | 22:00 |
mestery | danwent: We know where you're at if we have concerns. :) | 22:00 |
edgarmagana | drinks on Nicira next summit... ups sorry.. vmware! | 22:00 |
danwent | hehe… all too true. | 22:00 |
danwent | edgarmagana: yeah… that will take some time getting used to. | 22:00 |
danwent | ok, thanks folks. see you on gerrit! | 22:00 |
salv-orlando | mestery: sounds treating, good thing I'm not in Palo Alto :) | 22:00 |
zhuadl | hehe | 22:00 |
danwent | #endmeeting | 22:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meeting channel. See http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings for schedule and http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/ for meeting logs" | 22:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Mon Jul 23 22:00:46 2012 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 22:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-23-21.00.html | 22:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-23-21.00.txt | 22:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-23-21.00.log.html | 22:00 |
mestery | Bye folks! | 22:00 |
garyk | good night | 22:00 |
amotoki_ | thnka. good day! | 22:00 |
nati_uen_ | We will see VMWare in http://www.openstack.org/community/companies/ :) | 22:01 |
salv-orlando | rkukura: I will be online for a while, ping me if you want to chat about authZ for attributes | 22:01 |
nati_uen_ | Good day and night | 22:01 |
*** shivh has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
zhuadl | great news! | 22:01 |
rkukura | salv-orlando: yes | 22:01 |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:01 | |
danwent | nati_uen_: hopefully soon :) | 22:01 |
markvoelker1 | 'night folks | 22:02 |
PotHix | Bye! :) | 22:02 |
danwent | bye | 22:02 |
zhuadl | bye,guys! | 22:02 |
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
markmcclain | bye | 22:02 |
salv-orlando | bye, thanks all! | 22:03 |
s0mik | take care folks | 22:03 |
*** edgarmagana has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
rkukura | salv-orlando: Are you available to chat now? | 22:04 |
*** mattray has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
salv-orlando | rkukura: I have to apologize but will be afk for 5 minutes. | 22:08 |
salv-orlando | will ping you when I'm back. | 22:08 |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:08 | |
rkukura | salv-orlando: ok | 22:08 |
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 22:09 | |
*** arosen has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:10 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 22:10 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
*** markvoelker1 has left #openstack-meeting | 22:17 | |
*** AlanClark has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:20 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:25 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:31 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 22:32 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:33 | |
*** amotoki has left #openstack-meeting | 22:44 | |
*** clarkb has quit IRC | 22:48 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:12 | |
*** rnirmal has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:19 | |
*** kindaopsdevy_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:20 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
*** kindaopsdevy_ is now known as kindaopsdevy | 23:23 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
*** anderstj_ has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 23:32 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:34 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:36 | |
*** PotHix has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 23:43 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 23:44 | |
*** patelna_ has quit IRC | 23:50 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:51 | |
*** patelna has quit IRC | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!