*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:11 | |
*** msinhore has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:26 | |
*** msinhore has quit IRC | 01:41 | |
*** msinhore has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:14 | |
*** msinhore1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:01 | |
*** msinhore has quit IRC | 10:02 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 10:06 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:09 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:10 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:10 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:10 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:11 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:11 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:11 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:12 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:12 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:13 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:13 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:13 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:13 | |
*** msinhore1 has quit IRC | 11:14 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:14 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:14 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:14 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:15 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:15 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:15 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:16 | |
*** _adjohn has quit IRC | 11:16 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:17 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:17 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:17 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:18 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:18 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:19 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:19 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:20 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:20 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:20 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:20 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:20 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:21 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:51 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:52 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:53 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:53 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:54 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:54 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:55 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:55 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:55 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:55 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:56 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:57 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:57 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:57 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:58 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:58 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:58 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:58 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:59 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 11:59 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 11:59 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:00 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:00 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:00 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:00 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:00 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:00 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:01 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:02 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:02 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:33 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:34 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:34 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:35 | |
*** Binbin has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:35 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:36 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:36 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:36 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:37 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:38 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:38 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:38 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:39 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:40 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:40 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:40 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:40 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:41 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:42 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:42 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:43 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:43 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:44 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:44 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:44 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:44 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:45 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:45 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:45 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:46 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:46 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:46 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:46 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:47 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:47 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:48 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:48 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:49 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:50 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:50 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:50 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:50 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:50 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:51 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:52 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:52 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:53 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:53 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:54 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:54 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:54 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:55 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:55 | |
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:56 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:56 | |
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn | 12:56 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:57 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:57 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 12:58 | |
*** msinhore has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:09 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:38 | |
*** jkoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:03 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
*** vladimir3p has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:22 | |
*** creiht has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:39 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:59 | |
*** mdomsch has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:15 | |
*** Binbin has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
*** ohnoimdead has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:07 | |
*** reidrac has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:18 | |
*** med_out is now known as medberry | 17:30 | |
*** nati has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:54 | |
*** nati has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
*** nati has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:01 | |
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:06 | |
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:08 | |
*** Shubhangi has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:09 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:21 | |
*** Shubhangi has quit IRC | 18:27 | |
*** jakedahn has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:51 | |
*** shwetaap has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:03 | |
nati | CI Meeting? | 19:03 |
---|---|---|
*** sai has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:04 | |
*** Shubhangi has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:04 | |
*** nati has left #openstack-meeting | 19:08 | |
*** nati has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:08 | |
sai | hi | 19:09 |
soren | mtaylor: ping? | 19:09 |
*** spectorclan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:09 | |
mtaylor | soren: pong | 19:10 |
mtaylor | oh! hey - it's meeting time :) | 19:10 |
mtaylor | (darned timezones) | 19:10 |
soren | There's supposed to be a... | 19:10 |
ttx | it's your meeting dude : | 19:10 |
soren | right. | 19:10 |
soren | that | 19:10 |
soren | :) | 19:10 |
mtaylor | sorry - I got distracted talking to ttx. I blame him | 19:10 |
termie | zingaling | 19:10 |
nati | :D | 19:10 |
mtaylor | #startmeeting | 19:10 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jul 5 19:10:55 2011 UTC. The chair is mtaylor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 19:10 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. | 19:10 |
mtaylor | #topic CI Meeting | 19:11 |
*** openstack changes topic to "CI Meeting" | 19:11 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 19:11 | |
mtaylor | hey everybody - I'm assuming we've got some folks in here and stuff? | 19:11 |
mtaylor | hi nati | 19:11 |
dprince | yo | 19:12 |
mtaylor | hey dprince | 19:12 |
nati | hi mtaylor | 19:12 |
spectorclan_ | just watching from the background | 19:12 |
mtaylor | excellent | 19:12 |
mtaylor | so - first things first - let's check in on stuff from last time | 19:12 |
mtaylor | #topic Actions from last meeting | 19:12 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting" | 19:12 | |
mtaylor | dprince: you got the openstack_vpc job added and running. so, w00t! | 19:13 |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:13 | |
dprince | mtaylor: Yep. I think we can mark that completed. | 19:13 |
mtaylor | agree! | 19:13 |
mtaylor | can we add a new action for getting the tests run through nosexunit and returning the xml? | 19:14 |
dprince | mtaylor: So like we talked late last week I had to add a sleep to the job to get around this issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/804317 | 19:14 |
uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 804317 in nova "FixedIpNotFoundForInstance: Instance 1 has zero fixed ips." [Undecided,Incomplete] | 19:14 |
mtaylor | yes. do we have anybody on the nova side of things working on a real fix for that? | 19:14 |
dprince | Essentially after the multi_nic merge nova-network has to run a periodic task at least once before the network is set. | 19:15 |
dprince | I'll take it. | 19:15 |
mtaylor | sweet | 19:15 |
dprince | Or at least I'll argue for it. | 19:15 |
mtaylor | ttx marked it as incomplete... ttx, do you hate us? | 19:15 |
dprince | And yes. Lets have another task for the nosexunit stuff. | 19:15 |
ttx | I do. Let me check that. | 19:15 |
mtaylor | #action dprince Have smoketests return xunit file via nosexunit | 19:15 |
dprince | Yeah. I saw he marked it incomplete. I can refile in a more cleanly worded ticket perhaps? | 19:16 |
mtaylor | #action dprince fight with ttx over fixing bug 804317 | 19:16 |
uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 804317 in nova "FixedIpNotFoundForInstance: Instance 1 has zero fixed ips." [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/804317 | 19:16 |
ttx | dprince: marked it incomplete because tr3buchet seemed to consider it was normal behavior | 19:16 |
ttx | so it didn't seem everyone agreed it was something to be fixed :) | 19:17 |
dprince | Sure. I'll vet the idea a bit more. | 19:17 |
dprince | My options are sleep. Or edit the DB manually. | 19:17 |
mtaylor | ttx: well - in _some_ manner we need to be able to smoketest things without adding in a "sleep 1" call :) | 19:17 |
dprince | I'd prefer to do this via a nova-manage command. | 19:17 |
ttx | Though your comment #2 makes sense. | 19:17 |
ttx | rigth. I can confirm/wishlist it | 19:18 |
dprince | Additionally I think some end users will want a preset option as well. | 19:18 |
ttx | doing so right now. /me hates incomplete bugs anyway. | 19:18 |
mtaylor | yay! | 19:18 |
mtaylor | dprince: look at that - one of your actions for next week is done already! | 19:18 |
mtaylor | :) | 19:18 |
dprince | Yep. progress already. | 19:18 |
ttx | also note that the bug triaging game is a game that everybody is allowed to play. It's not just me. | 19:18 |
ttx | I'm doing it because almost nobody else does, boohoohoo | 19:18 |
mtaylor | so - next on the list is mtaylor jenkins job for the PXE boot goodness | 19:19 |
dprince | ttx: we just value your oppinion. | 19:19 |
nati | Thank you for your work! :ttx | 19:19 |
* ttx pads himself in the back | 19:19 | |
* dprince and by oppinion I really mean opinion | 19:19 | |
mtaylor | I had a meeting at rackspace last week with the folks from rcb in san fran (including termie, since he's in the meeting here) | 19:20 |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 19:20 | |
mtaylor | and it came out that it makes _way_ more sense to have them set up the bare metal deploy infrastructure that we'll just trigger from our jenkins (otherwise we were duplicating efforts) | 19:20 |
nati | cool | 19:21 |
mtaylor | so this is still outstanding, but we have a whole new approach to it ... termie, are you a point person for that? | 19:21 |
termie | mtaylor: oui | 19:21 |
mtaylor | termie: sweet - mind if I mark you down with an action of getting that spun up for this week? | 19:22 |
termie | sure | 19:22 |
mtaylor | #action termie finish work on bare-metal testing deployment | 19:22 |
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:22 | |
mtaylor | sweet. if we don't watch out - we're going to have progress around this joint | 19:22 |
soren | It'll pass. | 19:23 |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:23 | |
* soren <- optimist | 19:23 | |
mtaylor | I'll burn through the next ones real quick | 19:23 |
mtaylor | mtaylor fork griddynamics/openstack-rhel into openstack/openstack-rhel - done | 19:23 |
mtaylor | talk with Novel/MSFT Interop guys about an OBS build profile run from our jenkins - not done - kept playing phone tag with peter (mostly my fault or the fault of our offsite meeting) | 19:23 |
mtaylor | #action mtaylor connect with Peter from Novel/MSFT lap about OBS builds | 19:24 |
mtaylor | #action mtaylor connect with Peter from Novel/MSFT lap about hyperV testing | 19:24 |
mtaylor | mtaylor coordinate with Mihai from rPath to get him what he needs for getting the rPath builder up and going | 19:24 |
mtaylor | I spoke with mihai and we had a plan for this - but then last week everything changed with the machines we're using and the approach we're looking at across the board for testing different deployment options | 19:25 |
mtaylor | so I need to re-discuss with hium | 19:25 |
mtaylor | #action talk to Mihai about new options for rPath testing | 19:25 |
mtaylor | and I did none of the rest of the pinging - so I'll need to do that this week ... but will probably loop in termie as well so that we can make a good plan for what that might look like | 19:26 |
mtaylor | #action mtaylor ping ewanmellor about testing esx and vsphere | 19:26 |
mtaylor | #action mtaylor ping community at large about lxc testing | 19:26 |
mtaylor | #action mtaylor ping reddwarf team about openvx/lxc testing | 19:26 |
mtaylor | alright - so that was fun | 19:26 |
mtaylor | #topic Update on status of bare metal testing changes from last week | 19:27 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Update on status of bare metal testing changes from last week" | 19:27 | |
mtaylor | so - the only other thing I've got on this weeks agenda before open discussion was just to do an update on last week's conversations so that interested folks can be looped in | 19:27 |
mtaylor | before last week, the idea was that I had a chunk of machines and was working on the deployment of openstack on them for automated testing | 19:28 |
mtaylor | turns out - my lovely colleagues in san francisco are not only working on the same thing, it's what they do and they already have it working | 19:28 |
mtaylor | therefore, in the interest of sanity, we decided it made the most sense to hand the machines over to them and have them do their deployment thing and hand me a jenkins slave ... | 19:29 |
dprince | mtaylor: how many machines is it? | 19:29 |
mtaylor | which, incidentally, is the exact same approach that we would take with novell/msft and the hyperv lab - so I think we have a consistent approach to how we handle hardware setups people want tested | 19:30 |
mtaylor | dprince: 10 machines at the moment - we're working on requisitioning a different set of machines though (also, hopefully 10 machines) | 19:30 |
nati | consistent approach+ | 19:30 |
westmaas | mtaylor: sorry I came in a little late, but whats the config on this set of 10 machines? | 19:31 |
westmaas | which hypervisor, in particular, I mean/ | 19:31 |
mtaylor | westmaas: right now it's just 10 boxes ... termie - any thoughts on hypervisor you guys are going to attack first? | 19:31 |
mtaylor | westmaas: (actually, I eventually would love to get both a xenserver and a kvm hypervisor test up and going with our machines ... but I'll defer to termie there on what's sensible, if we know yet) | 19:32 |
termie | we always start with kvm | 19:32 |
termie | xenserver requires the knowledge and love of somebody else | 19:33 |
dprince | Termie: I've got a good start on some XenServer Cookbooks if you want to see them. | 19:33 |
dprince | termie: Wnat are you using for config mgmt? | 19:33 |
mtaylor | might it make sense to loop in with someone from rax cloud servers and get them to provide a set of machines + jenkins slave for xenserver deployments? | 19:33 |
mtaylor | or dprince perhaps :) | 19:34 |
termie | mtaylor: probably, that just isn't my focus at the moment | 19:34 |
mtaylor | termie: agree | 19:34 |
termie | dprince: we're using both chef and puppet at current | 19:34 |
dprince | mtaylor: I'm up for the task. Not sure I'm in a position to volunteer my time. Feel free to assign it to me and I'll get back to you. | 19:34 |
* mtaylor is sort of thinking that the stakeholders who want a particular thing tested should make sure that we get an environment on which we can run tests | 19:35 | |
termie | dprince: we generally prefer chef, but we had some customer reqs that ended up putting puppet back onto our plates | 19:35 |
dprince | mtaylor: very interested in seeing it done. | 19:35 |
mtaylor | dprince: cool - I'll put you down for it and then see if we can find internal rax motivation for ensuring you have the resources you need | 19:35 |
dprince | termie: I was wondering why you guys started getting cranking on the Puppet. Thanks. Good to see both. | 19:35 |
mtaylor | #action dprince investigate getting a xenserver-based bare-metal deploy up and going for CI purposes | 19:36 |
mtaylor | #action mtaylor bug people in management to get dprince resources | 19:36 |
mtaylor | actually, speaking of that action | 19:36 |
dprince | termie: In case you are interested... https://github.com/dprince/openstack_cookbooks/tree/master/cookbooks/xenserver | 19:37 |
*** vladimir3p_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:37 | |
dprince | termie: There is more work to be done there but it is a good start. | 19:37 |
termie | coolio | 19:37 |
mtaylor | anything else on that topic? or I'll open things up for general discussion | 19:38 |
nati | so which puppet recipes we use? | 19:38 |
nati | for baremetal setup | 19:38 |
dprince | nati: you might check out the cloud builders puppet scripts: https://github.com/cloudbuilders/openstack-puppet | 19:39 |
dprince | nati: I haven't tried them myself but they seem to be the furthest along. | 19:39 |
*** vladimir3p has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
nati | Thank: dprince | 19:39 |
nati | I got another one. https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-openstack | 19:40 |
mtaylor | nati: yes, I believe that is what is being used right now - there was discussion about getting that work integrated in with the stuff from the guys at puppetlabs eventually | 19:40 |
mtaylor | nati: sorry - I mean, I believe https://github.com/cloudbuilders/openstack-puppet is the one being used, and there is an eventual todo for someone to get that integrated with https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-openstack | 19:40 |
nati | I got it | 19:40 |
mtaylor | sweet | 19:41 |
nati | so this branch may be a official puppet recipes? | 19:41 |
mtaylor | #topic Open Discussion | 19:41 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion" | 19:41 | |
mtaylor | nati: perhaps not 100% related to CI itself, but since it's testing related... there is a guy at Dell wanting to do work on increasing test coverage and coordinating work on writing new tests ... I told him he should definitely talk with you about that | 19:43 |
mtaylor | nati: I believe dprince is also talking with him | 19:44 |
dprince | mtaylor: Is that Dean? We are talking to him on Thursday right? | 19:44 |
mtaylor | dprince: yes. that's him | 19:44 |
nati | Yes, I agree with you | 19:45 |
nati | Personally speaking, there are several dep tools, and I think we need a offial dep tool .. | 19:45 |
nati | cool | 19:45 |
mtaylor | nati: can you define dep tool for me in this context? | 19:45 |
mtaylor | #action mtaylor and dprince will discuss testing with Dean from Dell | 19:46 |
nati | automated openstack deploy tool | 19:46 |
mtaylor | ah - well, that's some of the stuff termie and folks are working on | 19:46 |
nati | cool | 19:46 |
termie | aye, working on that right this moment, actually | 19:47 |
nati | is there some docs of your work? :termie | 19:47 |
termie | nati: nope | 19:48 |
termie | nati: i am making the tool | 19:48 |
nati | cobbler + puppet? | 19:48 |
nati | or cobbler + chef? | 19:48 |
*** stevezd has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:49 | |
termie | dunno yet, still digging through the existing stuff | 19:49 |
termie | we've previously done pxe + preseed + chef | 19:49 |
mtaylor | vishy had also mentioned something about looking at orchestra+puppet, but don't know if that will make sense or be helpful | 19:49 |
termie | it isn't going to be helpful today | 19:49 |
termie | maybe next week once we have the basics moving | 19:49 |
nati | I got it, thank you for your information | 19:50 |
mtaylor | termie: speaking of - did you get my email with the wrap up of what I had moving on that box? I can't remember if I copied you on it or not | 19:50 |
termie | mtaylor: i don't think so | 19:50 |
mtaylor | termie: k. I'll go find and send it your way in case any of it is useful at all | 19:51 |
termie | general fyi, a bunch of work went into parts of these over the last week but it is all jumbled at the moment | 19:51 |
termie | which is why i don't have a lot of specific info | 19:51 |
termie | digging it out of the people who were working on it | 19:51 |
mtaylor | sweet | 19:52 |
mtaylor | k. sent | 19:53 |
mtaylor | alright ... anybody got anything else CI related they want to talk about? | 19:53 |
mtaylor | ok. in that case - I'm going to say that we're done - and early even! | 19:55 |
mtaylor | #endmeeting | 19:55 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Meetings: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/" | 19:55 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jul 5 19:55:19 2011 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 19:55 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-19.10.html | 19:55 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-19.10.txt | 19:55 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-19.10.log.html | 19:55 |
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:55 | |
*** nati has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
*** nati has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:58 | |
*** jbryce has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
notmyname | jbryce: do we have a meeting today or not? | 20:01 |
*** reidrac has left #openstack-meeting | 20:02 | |
jbryce | notmyname: not this week | 20:02 |
*** Shubhangi has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** ohnoimdead_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:08 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
*** ohnoimdead has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
*** ohnoimdead_ is now known as ohnoimdead | 20:11 | |
*** zns has left #openstack-meeting | 20:11 | |
*** ohnoimdead has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
*** nati has quit IRC | 20:13 | |
*** jbryce has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
*** jbryce has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:19 | |
*** sai has left #openstack-meeting | 20:22 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 20:25 | |
*** mdomsch has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
*** nati has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:27 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:29 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** nati has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
*** nati has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:38 | |
*** ohnoimdead has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:44 | |
*** ohnoimdead has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
*** ohnoimdead has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:44 | |
*** alandman has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:46 | |
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman | 20:49 | |
*** Vek has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
*** cynb has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
*** jk0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:52 | |
*** bidt has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:53 | |
*** carlp has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
*** bidt has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** User518 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
*** Tushar has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
*** mattt has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:57 | |
*** johan_-_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:57 | |
*** bcwaldon has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:59 | |
*** rdc has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:59 | |
ttx | o/ | 20:59 |
* Vek waves back | 21:00 | |
markvoelker | o/ | 21:00 |
dabo | \0 | 21:00 |
cynb | hola | 21:00 |
soren | o/ | 21:00 |
ttx | notmyname, vishy, jaypipes: ? | 21:00 |
notmyname | yar | 21:00 |
jaypipes | ttx: o/ | 21:01 |
ttx | I know vishy is not very far away, so let's start. | 21:02 |
vishy | o/ | 21:02 |
jaypipes | we at 4pm EDT now? .. hmm. have to update my calendar. | 21:02 |
ttx | didn't think he was that close, though :) | 21:02 |
ttx | #startmeeting | 21:02 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jul 5 21:02:26 2011 UTC. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:02 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. | 21:02 |
vishy | it is 5 EDT right now.... | 21:02 |
ttx | Meeting is at 21 UTC | 21:02 |
ttx | I don't even want to know about this EDT thing | 21:03 |
ttx | Today's agenda is at: | 21:03 |
ttx | #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/TeamMeeting | 21:03 |
*** comstud has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
ttx | #topic diablo-2 postmortem | 21:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "diablo-2 postmortem" | 21:03 | |
jaypipes | vishy: doh! still had my time set to San Antonio! :( | 21:03 |
*** Shubhangi has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
ttx | travel fail | 21:03 |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
ttx | Last week we released diablo-2, and for the first time there were fixes committed to the milestone-proposed branch | 21:03 |
ttx | The branches proposed for merging into milestone-proposed were reviewed by core teams, which caused confusion (since the branch was already reviewed for its trunk inclusion) | 21:04 |
ttx | So we decided that the milestone-proposed merge should be reviewed by another team | 21:04 |
ttx | and only accepted if (1) it made it to trunk first and (2) it was considered milestone-critical | 21:04 |
ttx | (so the core teams still control the quality of what gets in) | 21:04 |
ttx | The team in charge of that is openstack-release (me, soren + PTLs), so the core teams should not be bothered by double reviews again | 21:05 |
ttx | Any question or comment on how we handled diablo-2, or how we can improve the process ? | 21:05 |
*** ryu_ishimoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:05 | |
jaypipes | nope, the solution works for me... | 21:05 |
ttx | the process is mostly automated now, we need to cover the remaining gaps | 21:06 |
ttx | soren: btw, I worked on a script to do the LP "release" thing. | 21:06 |
ttx | so nothing should be manual anymore | 21:06 |
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:06 | |
ttx | #topic Swift status | 21:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Swift status" | 21:07 | |
ttx | notmyname: howdy | 21:07 |
notmyname | howdy | 21:07 |
ttx | notmyname: So at this point we are still planning on 1.4.2 release on July 20th ? | 21:07 |
notmyname | perhaps. we're in the middle of discussions with you about making it more closely align with the other projects in version number and release date. there is no resolution yet, though | 21:07 |
notmyname | but either way, the date will be july 20-29 | 21:08 |
ttx | ok | 21:08 |
ttx | Plan at https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.4.2 looks in very good shape. | 21:08 |
ttx | notmyname: Other announcements or comments ? | 21:08 |
*** carlp has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:08 | |
notmyname | I don't think so. | 21:08 |
ttx | Questions on Swift ? | 21:09 |
*** spectorclan_ has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
*** somik has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
ttx | #topic Glance status | 21:09 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance status" | 21:09 | |
ttx | jaypipes: Hi! | 21:09 |
ttx | Looking at: https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/diablo-3 | 21:09 |
ttx | That plan looks a bit optimistic, and D4 is pretty empty... Anything that should already be pushed back ? | 21:10 |
*** spectorclan_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:10 | |
ttx | jaypipes: ? | 21:11 |
* Vek guesses the jet lag is getting to jaypipes... | 21:11 | |
comstud | he fell back into san antonio time. | 21:11 |
jaypipes | ttx: sorry... here now | 21:11 |
ttx | comstud: lol | 21:11 |
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:12 | |
*** edconzel has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:12 | |
*** renuka has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:12 | |
jaypipes | ttx: keystone integration work is lagging a bit... I'll know by EOD tomorrow who/what team can pick up the slack on that. I will email you an update. | 21:12 |
ttx | nobody is assigned to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/glance-notifications, so it looks like a good D4 defer ? | 21:13 |
ttx | unless someone picks it up ? | 21:13 |
jaypipes | ttx: yes, please do. | 21:13 |
ttx | ack | 21:13 |
jaypipes | ttx: now that the Nova notification stuff is done, should be fairly simple to emulate | 21:13 |
comstud | jay: my team was trying to figure out if we were ready to do keystone/glance integration.. it's possible we could pick something up next sprint | 21:14 |
comstud | (july 18th) | 21:14 |
ttx | jaypipes: I'll wait for your update | 21:14 |
jaypipes | comstud: yeah, I'll email you and gabe to chat about it. | 21:14 |
ttx | jaypipes: Other announcements, comments ? | 21:14 |
jaypipes | ttx: no. | 21:14 |
ttx | Questions for the Glance PTL ? | 21:15 |
ttx | #topic Nova status | 21:15 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Nova status" | 21:15 | |
ttx | vishy: yo! | 21:15 |
ttx | Looking at: https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/diablo-3 | 21:15 |
ttx | vishy: So the plan is ambitious, and I'm in the process of confirming with all assignees that they still think they can deliver | 21:16 |
ttx | Everyone, let us know of anything in there that should be abandoned, or pushed back to D4 | 21:16 |
ttx | We already did a pass to adapt | 21:16 |
ttx | We should expect a lot of branch merges for this milestone, so the sooner we review, the better ! | 21:17 |
ttx | With that in mind, would be good to give review time to: | 21:17 |
ttx | https://code.launchpad.net/~nttdata/nova/block-migration/+merge/64662 | 21:17 |
comstud | Rackspace Shared IP groups might be changing per something I heard earlier today | 21:17 |
comstud | so that might be something that slips | 21:17 |
ttx | anyone feeling like they know that area enough to review that ? It only got one (syntactic) review in 20 days. | 21:17 |
ttx | comstud: yes, I still need to sync with Ozone | 21:17 |
ttx | comstud: thanks for the headsup | 21:18 |
comstud | ttx: you'll probably want to sync with ed conzel from rackspace product | 21:18 |
comstud | (i saw him join in here) | 21:18 |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 21:18 | |
comstud | (fyi) | 21:19 |
edconzel | yep | 21:19 |
edconzel | shared IP group might be replaced with AffinityID | 21:19 |
ttx | edconzel: what's the timeframe for the decision ? Would it still make the diablo-3 milestone ? | 21:20 |
comstud | i have a guess that won't make diablo-3 due to it being up in the air | 21:20 |
edconzel | final decision by 7/13 | 21:20 |
ttx | hmm, sounds a bit late to be written and merged for d3. We should probably retarget to D4... vishy ? | 21:21 |
vishy | agreed | 21:22 |
edconzel | ok | 21:22 |
ttx | that doesn't mean work should not start on it asap | 21:22 |
edconzel | agrred | 21:22 |
ttx | just that it would be merged early in D4 rather than late in D3 :) | 21:22 |
ttx | so nobody feeling up to reviewing the block-migration stuff ? Looks like daily reviewers have been avoiding it like the plague | 21:23 |
ttx | I'd rather not have it miss another milestone due to lack of reviews :) | 21:23 |
ttx | In related news, we also need an assignee for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/803654 -- since it's targeted to diablo-3 | 21:24 |
uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 803654 in nova "availability zone ignored when creating volume" [High,Confirmed] | 21:24 |
ttx | Anyone interested ? | 21:24 |
*** edconzel has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
comstud | current volume api can't really work with zones at all | 21:25 |
*** edconzel has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:25 | |
ttx | vishy: ^ | 21:25 |
comstud | if that's what that is | 21:25 |
comstud | since you have to create a volume.. and then later attach it | 21:25 |
vishy | this is actually just ec2 zones | 21:25 |
comstud | (to an instance) | 21:25 |
vishy | old school zones | 21:25 |
comstud | oops, just saw zones | 21:25 |
comstud | ok | 21:25 |
ttx | hah terminology overload | 21:26 |
ttx | ok, I guess I'll ask for reviewers/takers on the ML, it usually works better | 21:26 |
ttx | #action ttx to resurrect "stuff needing attantion" emails | 21:27 |
*** Shubhangi has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
ttx | vishy: anything else on your mind ? | 21:27 |
*** Shubhangi has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:28 | |
ttx | Questions on Nova ? | 21:28 |
ttx | #topic Open discussion | 21:29 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion" | 21:29 | |
vishy | nope | 21:29 |
ttx | annegentle asked me to tell everyone that "the Doc/web team meeting is moving to Mondays at 2000 UTC once a month, second Monday of the month". | 21:29 |
ttx | The calendar was updated | 21:29 |
spectorclan_ | Any developers wishing to participate in the 1 year OSCON video please contact me so I can work to get your 2 to 5 minute video. Thanks, | 21:29 |
carlp | Any word if the location of the October summit was finalized? | 21:29 |
ttx | spectorclan: ^ | 21:30 |
spectorclan_ | carlp: It is b/w the Intercontinental Hotel or the Microsoft Research Lab but I think the hotel will win | 21:30 |
spectorclan_ | 95% positive it is at the hotel | 21:30 |
spectorclan_ | October 3-5 | 21:30 |
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:30 | |
carlp | spectorclan, awesome, thanks! | 21:30 |
ttx | anything else, anyone ? | 21:31 |
mrmartin | Re, October 3-5 is the final date? | 21:31 |
ohnoimdead | what is the status of keystone support in swift? doesn't look like it's in for 1.4.2? | 21:31 |
spectorclan_ | mrmartin: yes | 21:31 |
spectorclan_ | conference is 5-7 with 5th just being evening event | 21:32 |
ttx | ohnoimdead: it's not showing up in the plan yet... maybe notmyname knows when this is planned | 21:32 |
creiht | I thought support was already available through keystone? | 21:33 |
ohnoimdead | would be awesome to get that stitched up in the dashboard since right now it's a tempauthtrocity | 21:33 |
mrmartin | creiht: do you have any news about lunr? | 21:33 |
creiht | I should be making an email to the list either this evening or tomorrow | 21:34 |
ttx | creiht: oh, it can be used directly ? | 21:34 |
creiht | ttx: I thought... I'm trying to find that doc | 21:34 |
creiht | https://github.com/rackspace/keystone | 21:35 |
creiht | in the README | 21:35 |
creiht | "Swift Integration - Quick Start" | 21:35 |
ttx | yes, google just found it for me, reading | 21:36 |
* creiht notes that note at the bottom | 21:36 | |
creiht | Note: Keystone currently allows any valid token to do anything with any account. | 21:36 |
jaypipes | creiht: is there a bug on that somewhere? | 21:36 |
ttx | hmm, I sure like that | 21:36 |
creiht | jaypipes: I have no idea, just repeating what I am reading :) | 21:37 |
ohnoimdead | yeah, wasn't sure if that was official or not. i tried to get it to work but was getting some errors (sent to the list). i'll try again see if i can get further. | 21:37 |
creiht | I've been a bit out of the loop on the swift/keystone things, just relaying what I have seen come accross the screen | 21:37 |
ttx | yes, I need to catch up too. Sign, so many things to look at, and only 24 hours in a day | 21:38 |
ttx | Sigh, even | 21:38 |
*** joearnold has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
creiht | ohnoimdead: I would ask the keystone devs | 21:38 |
ttx | which makes me think it's getting close to the end of that 24th hour here, so... | 21:39 |
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:39 | |
ttx | if nobody has anything more, I'll close this | 21:39 |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
ttx | #endmeeting | 21:39 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Meetings: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/" | 21:39 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jul 5 21:39:46 2011 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 21:39 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-21.02.html | 21:39 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-21.02.txt | 21:39 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-21.02.log.html | 21:39 |
ttx | Thanks everyone ! | 21:39 |
*** comstud has left #openstack-meeting | 21:40 | |
*** spectorclan_ has quit IRC | 21:40 | |
carlp | thanks ttx! | 21:40 |
jaypipes | ttx: thx mate | 21:40 |
*** mrmartin has quit IRC | 21:40 | |
*** johan_-_ has left #openstack-meeting | 21:41 | |
medberry | thanks. | 21:42 |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:42 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
*** renuka has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
*** jk0 has left #openstack-meeting | 21:44 | |
*** Vek has left #openstack-meeting | 21:45 | |
*** mattt has left #openstack-meeting | 21:54 | |
*** ameade has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
*** rdc has left #openstack-meeting | 22:00 | |
danwent | good morning/afternoon/evening netstack... | 22:01 |
troytoman | hello | 22:01 |
salv-orlando | Hi! | 22:01 |
ryu_ishimoto | hi | 22:01 |
danwent | ok, anyone from cisco on the line? | 22:02 |
danwent | otherwise we can wait a few mins. | 22:02 |
danwent | or troy, perhaps we talk about melange first? I need some cisco folks around for the quantum stuff. | 22:03 |
danwent | #startmeeting | 22:03 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jul 5 22:03:20 2011 UTC. The chair is danwent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 22:03 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. | 22:03 |
*** dabo has left #openstack-meeting | 22:03 | |
danwent | #topic melange | 22:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "melange" | 22:03 | |
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:03 | |
danwent | hi sumit, good to see you're here... | 22:03 |
SumitNaiksatam | hey Dan | 22:04 |
danwent | we were waiting for someone from your team to joint to talk about quantum, so we're talking about melange first. | 22:04 |
danwent | troy? | 22:04 |
troytoman | Not much new to report. We're doing some work on IPv6 support and the ability to subnet blocks. Hoped to have the wiki updated by now but should get done this week. | 22:04 |
SumitNaiksatam | and everyone | 22:04 |
*** shwetaap has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
*** Shubhangi has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
troytoman | Also looking at the network-refactoring discussion and starting to think about how to integrate with Nova. | 22:04 |
danwent | Ok, I have been going through the existing nova code and want to sync up with you about how the melange stuff will fit in. can do it offline though. | 22:04 |
troytoman | we're also bringing some RAX nova core devs into the team to help us with that analysis | 22:05 |
danwent | very cool. | 22:05 |
markvoelker | o/ | 22:05 |
*** eperdomo has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:05 | |
troytoman | i think that's it unless there are questions | 22:05 |
danwent | #topic quantum | 22:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "quantum" | 22:05 | |
danwent | whoops, forgot to send out the agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/Meetings | 22:05 |
danwent | for those just joining, we're switched the order to do melange first. | 22:06 |
danwent | nova refactoring. ryu, want to give an update? | 22:06 |
ryu_ishimoto | sure | 22:07 |
danwent | wiki page is here: http://wiki.openstack.org/network-refactoring | 22:07 |
ryu_ishimoto | we've made progress ironing out the remaining issues offline with those involved | 22:07 |
ryu_ishimoto | in particular we are almost there with the libivrt driver refactoring | 22:07 |
*** Shubhangi has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:07 | |
ryu_ishimoto | sumit made a very nice proposal for that, and I will add that to the wiki | 22:08 |
salv-orlando | ryu_ishimoto: do you mean the network/linux_net driver? | 22:08 |
ryu_ishimoto | salv-orlando: I mean the VIF configuration for libvirt(the generation of interface XML section) | 22:09 |
salv-orlando | ok, I see. | 22:09 |
danwent | ryu_ishimoto: btw, I've downloaded your branch and will be playing with it after the meeting today. What is your preferred method of feedback on the wiki-page content and code? | 22:09 |
danwent | still just email? | 22:09 |
ryu_ishimoto | danwent: Either works for me | 22:10 |
danwent | I think salvatore and I have found the problem with using launchpad answers for feedback: there doesn't seem to be a way to quote someone previous comments | 22:10 |
danwent | which is too bad because launchpad answers is nice and public, and has a good subscription mechanism :( | 22:10 |
*** RamD has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:10 | |
salv-orlando | danwent: I don't understand actually why you can quote on comments for merge proposals and not answers... | 22:10 |
danwent | Ok, sumit anything to add? | 22:10 |
salv-orlando | ryu... one last thing | 22:11 |
danwent | salv-orlando: yes, odd indeed :) | 22:11 |
ryu_ishimoto | salv-orlando: yup | 22:11 |
salv-orlando | I would like to play with your branch as well, but which one is exactly? I see 3 branches on the network-refactoring blueprint | 22:11 |
SumitNaiksatam | sorry i was sleeping :-) | 22:11 |
danwent | https://code.launchpad.net/~midokura/nova/network-refactoring | 22:11 |
danwent | at the top of the wiki page | 22:11 |
salv-orlando | ok, thanks | 22:11 |
SumitNaiksatam | so are we all in sync on the VIF driver stuff? | 22:12 |
ryu_ishimoto | danwent: yup that's it thanks Dan | 22:12 |
danwent | Sumit: I don't think so.... | 22:12 |
danwent | I have an email out to Ryu on that, but I'll let him wake up before he needs to respond :) | 22:12 |
danwent | I know its early :) | 22:12 |
ryu_ishimoto | SumitNaiksatam: I have no problem with it, and i was JUST about to reply to that email | 22:12 |
SumitNaiksatam | ok great | 22:13 |
ryu_ishimoto | I'm really curious what Nova core guys feel about it too! | 22:13 |
danwent | Ok, so let's just keep grinding on that discussion. | 22:13 |
danwent | ryu: +1 | 22:13 |
salv-orlando | would you include me as well in this loop? I'm curious. I promise I will not disturb too much :-) | 22:13 |
danwent | salv: sorry, didn't realize you weren't. I thought ryu CC'd everyone | 22:14 |
ryu_ishimoto | salv-orlando: Yeah of course. The plan is to throw what we discussed to the entire community for more discussion as well | 22:14 |
ryu_ishimoto | salv-orlando: I kept adding people but I forgot to add you, sorry | 22:14 |
RamD | Could you include us all in that nova discussions | 22:15 |
salv-orlando | ryu_ishimoto: np | 22:15 |
salv-orlando | could we have a netstack mainling list ? :) | 22:15 |
ryu_ishimoto | sure i'll add the entire netstack group, the discussion started with something vey small and grew large | 22:15 |
RamD | salv-orlando:+1 | 22:15 |
danwent | I'm in favor, I know there were concerns about this that others had mentioned to Rick, but let's revisit this. | 22:16 |
danwent | #action re-explore getting a netstack list | 22:16 |
danwent | #action danwent re-explore getting a netstack list | 22:16 |
salv-orlando | the fact is that we typically don't use the openstack mailing list to avoid spam | 22:17 |
*** bcwaldon has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
danwent | salv: agreed. a lot of these discussions are high volume | 22:17 |
danwent | so we don't want to be spamming the openstack list, but it makes sense that if someone wants the volume, they should be able to get it. | 22:17 |
RamD | Another suggestion: Create a design decision web page. and captute all the highlevel points there... | 22:17 |
danwent | RamD: should blueprints capture this? | 22:18 |
danwent | or are you talking about something else? | 22:18 |
*** Shubhangi has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
RamD | danwent: I think a highlevel points that shows design decisions...and refer to BPs...that would be great | 22:18 |
danwent | btw, in the mean time, before we get a netstack list, please let ryu know if you want to be looped into the nova-refactoring discussion. | 22:19 |
*** creiht has left #openstack-meeting | 22:19 | |
danwent | RamD: do you mean kind of general design principles? | 22:19 |
danwent | that we've agreed on for quantum? | 22:20 |
RamD | yes | 22:20 |
danwent | I think that would be valuable. I still have a half-written doc on that..... kind of lost momentum. I will revive it and put it on a wiki. | 22:20 |
danwent | #action danwent, revive design principles portion of "what is quantum?" doc, post on wiki. | 22:20 |
RamD | Not to make it as big "documentation" effort...but to syncup any new people joining us | 22:20 |
RamD | danwent: Super...let me know if you need another kbd :-) | 22:21 |
danwent | RamD: agreed. | 22:21 |
danwent | OK, anything else on nova refactoring? | 22:21 |
ryu_ishimoto | that's it for now! | 22:22 |
danwent | thanks ryu. | 22:22 |
danwent | Ok, api auth. | 22:22 |
danwent | salvatore. | 22:22 |
salv-orlando | https://answers.launchpad.net/quantum/+question/163091 | 22:22 |
*** msinhore has quit IRC | 22:22 | |
danwent | salv: sorry for getting feedback to you so late. | 22:22 |
danwent | will respond to your most recent comments later today, I hope. | 22:23 |
salv-orlando | this is the address where we are discussing the proposed specification. I already received Dan's feedback and you are all warmly invited to give your feedback | 22:23 |
danwent | not being able to "quote" is a real downside here.... | 22:23 |
salv-orlando | The interesting thing, is that, as Dan pointed out, authorization for Quantum kinds of goes back to the problem of the interaction with Nova wrt port creation and interface plugging | 22:23 |
salv-orlando | a problem we never fully fleshed out. Perhaps now the time is ripe to finalize that discussion | 22:24 |
danwent | Ok, is anyone else planning on commenting on the spec? | 22:25 |
danwent | Just trying to gauge how long salvatore should be waiting for feedback. | 22:25 |
danwent | ok, anything else on auth? | 22:25 |
markvoelker | I wouldn't mind having another read through….if I have anything I'll get it to you by tomorrow night. | 22:25 |
danwent | makrvoelker: great, thanks. | 22:26 |
danwent | ok, extensions discussion. | 22:26 |
salv-orlando | Is anyone planning to have a discussion around whether plugging an interface into a network is an operation that should be explictly be performed by tenants or by nova on behalf of the tenant (ie: should be an operation of an 'admin API')? | 22:26 |
danwent | salv-orlando: I assume you mean logical plugging? | 22:27 |
salv-orlando | yeah, logical of course :-) | 22:27 |
danwent | I believe the plan is that it will be possible for tenants to plug directly, or something else can "orchestrate" on behalf of the tenants. | 22:27 |
danwent | that something else could be donabe, or it even could be nova | 22:27 |
SumitNaiksatam | that was my understanding | 22:27 |
danwent | nova already does a far amount of orchestration, though I'm not sure thats the long-term goal. | 22:28 |
danwent | any other opinions out there? | 22:28 |
salv-orlando | Ok, so can we be safely sure we don't need a discussion on this point? | 22:28 |
carlp | sounds reasonable to me | 22:28 |
troytoman | we are thinking that we should limit orchestration in Nova as a general rule | 22:28 |
*** edconzel has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
danwent | salv-orlando: one of the things I am thinking about when reviewing ryu's branch is what it would mean for nova to orchestrate quantum | 22:29 |
troytoman | that said plugging in a vif within Nova is something that we would probably do | 22:29 |
danwent | ok, extensions. | 22:29 |
salv-orlando | danwent: That's why I want to play with the refactoring branch, as this might also affect the way in which we do authorization in Quantum. | 22:29 |
danwent | salv-orlando: I agree. | 22:30 |
danwent | is james here? | 22:30 |
salv-orlando | for extensions, is James on line? | 22:30 |
danwent | or ying? | 22:30 |
danwent | James sent an email about discussing extensions. | 22:30 |
RamD | danwent: What is the q ..sorry | 22:30 |
danwent | it will probably happen later this week. | 22:31 |
danwent | holler if you want to be involved and we'll make sure you get the invite. | 22:31 |
troytoman | I don't think we've found a time yet. | 22:31 |
danwent | yeah, last email in the thread was from troy | 22:31 |
RamD | danwent: Yes. Will followup with James/Ying on the extensions discussions | 22:31 |
danwent | RamD: thx. | 22:31 |
danwent | and last but not least for quantum: Mark | 22:32 |
danwent | any updates on the GUI? | 22:32 |
troytoman | i think we'll have some updates to the extension merge prop that handles plug-ins etc. | 22:32 |
danwent | + client lib stuff? | 22:32 |
markvoelker | Actually, it might be "least" for this week. =) | 22:32 |
danwent | :) | 22:32 |
danwent | troy: great. | 22:32 |
markvoelker | Due to the holidays and folks being on PTO for the US Independence Day holiday and medical reasons there hasn't been a huge amount of progress. | 22:32 |
markvoelker | However, Arvind did get a prelim mockup branch posted | 22:33 |
markvoelker | It's linked here: | 22:33 |
markvoelker | https://code.launchpad.net/~asomya/+junk/dashboard-quantum-mockup | 22:33 |
danwent | cool. | 22:33 |
markvoelker | There are some known issues yet as it's what he had time for before leaving the country (he'll be out all this week as well). Those are in the whiteboard on the BP: | 22:33 |
markvoelker | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-client-gui | 22:33 |
markvoelker | Tyler is beginning work on the refactor but has been out today and yesterday. I'll have him get a branch linked as soon as he returns. | 22:34 |
danwent | great, thanks for the update. | 22:34 |
danwent | anything else on quantum? | 22:34 |
RamD | test-framework for Qunatum..Is Santosh or any one else doing that? | 22:34 |
danwent | unit tests? | 22:34 |
danwent | or system test? | 22:34 |
danwent | unit test stuff should be in | 22:35 |
danwent | salv, somik? | 22:35 |
danwent | brad? | 22:35 |
bhall | savlatore and I have gotten some pieces for unit testing in and are currently working on more tests | 22:35 |
salv-orlando | Thankfully, there's no independence day in the UK | 22:35 |
bhall | filling out the other pieces | 22:35 |
markvoelker | RamD: were you referring to: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-system-test ? | 22:35 |
salv-orlando | it would be a bit of a nonsense, after all | 22:35 |
danwent | bhall: it would be great if we had docs on how to run the unit tests... I think you were going to do that? | 22:35 |
danwent | salv: yes... wouldn't expect the UK to celebrate that :) | 22:36 |
RamD | markvoelkar: yes..wanted to find if any other piecees need to be done | 22:36 |
bhall | sh run_tests.sh .. but yeah, I can create a document :) | 22:36 |
somik | salv-orlando: lol | 22:36 |
salv-orlando | I said because I used last week to make some progress starting from Brad's branch | 22:36 |
markvoelker | bhall: what about getting things into Jenkins/Smokestack? | 22:36 |
danwent | mark: I think that is waiting on incubation... | 22:36 |
danwent | really need to chase down dendrobates and get an update on that | 22:37 |
danwent | #action danwent: find out current status of incubation from dendrobates | 22:37 |
markvoelker | danwent: Ah, ok. RamD or myself can harass him. =) | 22:37 |
carlp | I'm building a Jenkins for Openstack/Ceph, and was planning on running some networking stuff on it too | 22:37 |
danwent | mark: the more the better :) | 22:37 |
danwent | carlp: great. what's Ceph? | 22:38 |
*** romain_lenglet has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:38 | |
carlp | Storage System that we are developing. Unrelated to networking, but I have interest in both :) | 22:38 |
danwent | carlp: ah, cool. | 22:38 |
salv-orlando | bhall: updated branch for unit tests is in lp:~netstack/quantum/quantum-unit-tests | 22:38 |
carlp | I'm hoping to get Jenkins running this week, I'll be happy to give logins to those we deem worthy :) | 22:38 |
danwent | carlp: very cool. please keep me in the loop. | 22:39 |
carlp | will do | 22:39 |
danwent | (if you deem me worthy) :P | 22:39 |
salv-orlando | carlp: just a curiosity... why is the project call Ceph? | 22:39 |
danwent | anything else on quantum? | 22:40 |
salv-orlando | on unit tests... | 22:40 |
salv-orlando | I have implemented several test cases for the API, will complete them by tomorrow. | 22:40 |
salv-orlando | FakePlugin has ben enhanced to use in-memory sqlite db with models provided in quantum.db. This will ensure high code coverage. | 22:41 |
bhall | awesome.. soon it will be time to look at code coverage numbers :) | 22:41 |
salv-orlando | We need unit tests for db, cli, wsgi and plugin-interface as well | 22:41 |
somik | that sounds like a good improvement | 22:41 |
salv-orlando | the branch is on netstack ownership, so feel free to add stuff! | 22:41 |
danwent | salv: great work. is there a blueprint were we are tracking the areas you think need work? | 22:42 |
salv-orlando | In the meanwhile I did a self "cease and desist" on proposing other branches for merge... | 22:42 |
danwent | is it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/api-spec-unit-tests | 22:42 |
danwent | or something else? | 22:42 |
salv-orlando | yes, that one | 22:42 |
danwent | k, thanks. | 22:42 |
danwent | last call on quantum... | 22:42 |
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away | 22:42 | |
danwent | anyone here to talk about donabe? | 22:43 |
danwent | #topic open discussion | 22:43 |
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion" | 22:43 | |
salv-orlando | I have a question on the nestack-core team | 22:43 |
danwent | sure. | 22:44 |
salv-orlando | I sent an email to Rick, as we decided a few weeks ago, proposing myself as a core member, but I'm not on the list. | 22:44 |
danwent | really? | 22:44 |
salv-orlando | I know it is not nice to self-candidate but that's what we agreed :-) | 22:44 |
danwent | #action dendrobates make salv-orlando a core member | 22:44 |
salv-orlando | k, thanks | 22:45 |
danwent | you've contributed much more code than most people in that group... not sure how that happened. | 22:45 |
danwent | thanks for bringing it up. | 22:45 |
danwent | anything else? | 22:45 |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:45 | |
danwent | (not to mention done reviews, fixed bugs, etc.) | 22:45 |
danwent | ok, folks. have a good one! | 22:46 |
danwent | #endmeeting | 22:46 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Meetings: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/" | 22:46 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jul 5 22:46:11 2011 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 22:46 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-22.03.html | 22:46 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-22.03.txt | 22:46 |
salv-orlando | bye! | 22:46 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-05-22.03.log.html | 22:46 |
*** Tushar has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
somik | take care everybody, till next week. | 22:46 |
carlp | Thanks all! | 22:46 |
markvoelker | 'bye! | 22:46 |
SumitNaiksatam | thanks, bye | 22:47 |
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
carlp | danwent, just an FYI - I worked with the folks at RS who are setting up the Jenkins stuff there. The goals is for me to be able to link my system to theirs. Should make life better for everyone :) | 22:47 |
*** markvoelker has left #openstack-meeting | 22:47 | |
danwent | carlp: cool. i've very new to the jenkins stuff, but I'd love to be able to poke at it. | 22:48 |
carlp | I'm new at is as well, it's a learning experience for everyone :) | 22:48 |
*** eperdomo has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:51 | |
*** markvoelker has left #openstack-meeting | 22:51 | |
RamD | bye | 22:52 |
*** RamD has left #openstack-meeting | 22:52 | |
*** jkoelker has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
*** carlp has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
*** romain_lenglet has left #openstack-meeting | 23:04 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:10 | |
*** ryu_ishimoto has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
*** medberry is now known as med_out | 23:13 | |
*** msinhore has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:24 | |
*** alandman has quit IRC | 23:25 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 23:32 | |
*** nati has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:50 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!