| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 00:17 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
| *** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 01:45 | |
| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 01:45 | |
| *** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 01:45 | |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 01:47 | |
| *** stevemar_ is now known as stevemar | 02:49 | |
| *** uxdanielle has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
| *** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 06:38 | |
| *** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 06:49 | |
| *** Horax has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 06:52 | |
| *** Horax has left #openstack-meeting-cp | 07:08 | |
| *** homerp_ has quit IRC | 07:42 | |
| *** homerp has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 07:42 | |
| *** prateek has quit IRC | 09:03 | |
| *** coolsvap_ is now known as coolsvap | 09:09 | |
| *** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 09:21 | |
| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
| *** kbyrne has quit IRC | 10:02 | |
| *** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 10:06 | |
| *** prateek has quit IRC | 10:22 | |
| *** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 10:33 | |
| *** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 11:08 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 12:09 | |
| *** uxdanielle has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 12:12 | |
| *** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 12:37 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 13:43 | |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 13:43 | |
| *** daibz has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 13:55 | |
| *** catherine_d|1 has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 13:57 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 13:58 | |
| *** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 13:58 | |
| topol | #startmeeting interop_challenge | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Sep 14 14:00:20 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is topol. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'interop_challenge' | 14:00 |
| tongli | o/ | 14:00 |
| markvoelker | o/ | 14:00 |
| topol | Hi everyone, who is here for the interop challenge meeting today? | 14:00 |
| skazi | o/ | 14:00 |
| Rockyg | o/ | 14:00 |
| catherine_d|1 | o/ | 14:01 |
| topol | The agenda for today can be found at: | 14:01 |
| topol | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2016-09-14 | 14:01 |
| topol | We can use this same etherpad to take notes | 14:01 |
| topol | #topic review action items from previous meeting | 14:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "review action items from previous meeting (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)" | 14:01 | |
| *** eeiden has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:01 | |
| topol | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-09-07-14.00.html | 14:02 |
| topol | tongli topol check on ATT NFV workload scripts. | 14:02 |
| topol | tongli and topol to check with MarkBaker on write up/point to some docs instructing people how to get going (juju + NFV) | 14:02 |
| topol | I don't believe we got anything on this. MarkBaker you around? | 14:02 |
| luzC | o/ | 14:03 |
| topol | I think we are running out of time for this to make it for Barcelona | 14:03 |
| luzC | sorry to be late, what is the topic? | 14:03 |
| *** lizdurst_ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:04 | |
| topol | especially based on foundation feedback which I will get to later | 14:04 |
| eeiden | Hey all -- sorry was out of the office for about a week and a half. I'm 90% sure we have a workload ready to go, just need to get in contact with the owner. | 14:04 |
| *** kbyrne has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
| topol | eeiden, okay let see what shows up. | 14:04 |
| topol | luzC we are reviewing action items from last meeting | 14:05 |
| *** jkomg has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:05 | |
| luzC | cool, thanks | 14:05 |
| topol | Next action was fredli, will take the action to find out about the DT cloud. | 14:05 |
| topol | any update on DT cloud? | 14:05 |
| *** JASON__ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:05 | |
| JASON__ | Hi, all | 14:05 |
| *** pilgrimstack has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:06 | |
| topol | Rockyg, any idea about DT cloud? | 14:06 |
| *** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:06 | |
| *** sajeesh has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:06 | |
| pilgrimstack | Hi from OVH | 14:06 |
| JASON__ | We will get the answer from DT cloud by end of this week | 14:07 |
| Rockyg | JASON__, topol just asked about dt cloud. any update? | 14:07 |
| topol | JASON__, cool | 14:07 |
| Rockyg | thanks | 14:07 |
| JASON__ | we have forwarded the message to them in last week | 14:07 |
| topol | pilgrimstack what does OVH stand for just curiously? | 14:07 |
| *** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:07 | |
| *** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:07 | |
| topol | #action JASON__, Rockyg to check on DT cloud | 14:08 |
| tongli | @topol, both Huawei public cloud and DT cloud, I think. | 14:08 |
| *** Tetsuo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:08 | |
| JASON__ | BTW , We are prepare the testing on HW cloud since last meeting with tongli | 14:08 |
| pilgrimstack | topol: what do you mean? what do you want to know? | 14:08 |
| JASON__ | Got it | 14:08 |
| Rockyg | tongli, yes, right | 14:08 |
| topol | #action JASON__, Rockyg to check on Huaweii cloud as well | 14:09 |
| JASON__ | I will pass the message to all of your guys asap | 14:09 |
| topol | pilgrimstack, its an acronym correct? Like IBM is Intenrational Business Machines | 14:09 |
| JASON__ | Sure, topol | 14:09 |
| JASON__ | I will report the progress | 14:09 |
| * topol I didnt know what OVH stood for as an acronym. And since your cloud is working with the workloads wanted to know :-) | 14:10 | |
| JASON__ | we have team to support the testing , but i need tongli help as well . | 14:10 |
| topol | JASON__ you may have tongli :-) | 14:10 |
| JASON__ | thanks , topol . | 14:11 |
| pilgrimstack | haha, good question, their is many different stories :p the main one is "On Vous Heberge" in french which means "We Host You" | 14:11 |
| topol | pilgrimstack, That works. Thanks | 14:11 |
| tongli | @pilgrimstack, thanks for pointing me to a different region. BTW, both region worked. | 14:12 |
| topol | next item Rockyg to post request for clouds to openstack-ops ML | 14:12 |
| topol | Rockyg were you able to do that? | 14:12 |
| *** Daviey_ is now known as Daviey | 14:12 | |
| Rockyg | oh. dang. that was me, too? dang. today | 14:12 |
| topol | ok perfect. #action Rockyg to post to openstack-ops ML | 14:13 |
| JASON__ | @tongli, rocky, do you know the progress of DefCore guideline | 14:13 |
| topol | next item catherine_d|1 to provide new wiki section for volunteer a cloud acct/who to contact | 14:13 |
| topol | this was done | 14:13 |
| catherine_d|1 | yup | 14:13 |
| topol | Thanks! | 14:14 |
| topol | next item pilgrimstack1 to run workload and also get tongli acess | 14:14 |
| Rockyg | link, please? | 14:14 |
| topol | I believe this is done. tongli is able to succesfully run on OVH | 14:14 |
| tongli | @topol, yes. OVH worked well in terms of interop. | 14:15 |
| tongli | so did OSIC cloud. with no issues. | 14:15 |
| topol | catherine_d|1 where did you add this? | 14:15 |
| topol | yes, towards the end we will cover where workloads are successfully running. we have a list | 14:16 |
| JASON__ | @all , when the deadline of testing ? | 14:16 |
| catherine_d|1 | one sec .. | 14:16 |
| topol | JASON__ we agreed two weeks before Barcelona. But But sooner is always much better | 14:17 |
| luzC | tongli on OSIC cloud you are changing terraform workload to use Ansible instead right? | 14:17 |
| JASON__ | thanks. | 14:17 |
| topol | especially since the foundation is reviewing stuff | 14:17 |
| topol | okay todays agenda items | 14:17 |
| tongli | @luzC, yes, terraform won't work against many clouds since the multiple endpoints issue, | 14:18 |
| topol | yes, the terraform issue is on todays agenda | 14:18 |
| tongli | that can not be resolved by changing scripts. | 14:18 |
| topol | we'll get there folks. I promise | 14:18 |
| topol | #topic Update from meeting/demo with OpenStack Foundation Jonathan Bryce | 14:18 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Update from meeting/demo with OpenStack Foundation Jonathan Bryce (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)" | 14:18 | |
| topol | Demo went well. Jonathan most like the LAMPStack workload because it was a true enterprise app with security rules, etc. This is the app he wants folks to see running across multiple cloud targets | 14:19 |
| topol | He had an upcoming production call where they will discuss how to show off. | 14:19 |
| *** rarcea has quit IRC | 14:19 | |
| topol | So everyone should focus on that workload as the priority since that is the one that fits best into the foundations messaging on this topic during the Barcelona keynote day 2 | 14:20 |
| *** hj-hpe has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:20 | |
| JASON__ | got it | 14:21 |
| catherine_d|1 | Rockyg: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Interop_Challenge under the " Test Candidate Process" with tongli: 's contact info | 14:21 |
| hj-hpe | Sorry, I got late to the party this morning | 14:21 |
| topol | so this workload uses advanced features like security groups that not all clouds support. Jonathan's preference was that we stick with this workload because it is a true enterprise workload | 14:21 |
| Rockyg | thanks | 14:21 |
| *** gema has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:22 | |
| topol | and Jonathan was okay if a few clouds could not run this workload. That just leaves room for improvement | 14:22 |
| topol | I would suspect as part of the Keynote they will have several of us up on stage representing the different participating vendors. We’ll keep you posted. | 14:23 |
| topol | I also expect we will be asked for quotes from the different vendors on the importance of interop/value of the the work. | 14:23 |
| *** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 14:23 | |
| topol | #action please figure out who is the right executive in your company that is supposed to handle quotes for the press. We will need to have PR folks contact them and will need to move quickly on that. Check with your OpenStack Board member rep. | 14:23 |
| topol | They typically do it or know who should | 14:23 |
| topol | several folks were in attendance with the meeting with Jonathan. Anything else folks would like to mention? | 14:24 |
| topol | MarkVoelker, Rockyg? ^ | 14:24 |
| topol | markvoelker | 14:25 |
| Rockyg | Other than the demo went well, nope. | 14:25 |
| * markvoelker has nothing further | 14:25 | |
| topol | cool | 14:25 |
| topol | next topic: | 14:25 |
| topol | #topic Interop-challenge code repository, should we establish a more responsive project? | 14:25 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Interop-challenge code repository, should we establish a more responsive project? (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)" | 14:25 | |
| topol | So Im getting lots of complaints that where we are trying to host the workloads reviews/merges are taking too long | 14:26 |
| topol | someone suggested #link https://github.com/openstack/defcore | 14:26 |
| Rockyg | met with the app ecosystem wg. They are interested, but timeline might be too long. | 14:27 |
| markvoelker | Currently that repo has three cores: myself, hogepodge, and eglute. I'm not opposed to creating a contrib directory or something if it's helpful. | 14:27 |
| tongli | @markvoelker, that repo is quite big, that is only my concern. | 14:28 |
| topol | tongli as part of the demo do you have to clone the repo or that step is already done? | 14:29 |
| tongli | @markvoelker, not against using it though. | 14:29 |
| topol | where does it being a large repo impact us? | 14:29 |
| luzC | I think because of the nature of the workloads is better to keep them on osops-tools-contrib | 14:30 |
| luzC | but not sure how to accelerate the review process | 14:30 |
| topol | luzC can we get faster reviews? | 14:30 |
| luzC | probably posting on the ops channel when pending reviews are in the queue | 14:30 |
| luzC | looking for the ptl (if any)... not sure how that particular group works | 14:31 |
| topol | luzC, K please see if we can get reviews speeded up. | 14:31 |
| topol | we have other repos where we could make everyone cores. tongli has OpenStaclk kiloeyes | 14:32 |
| topol | tongli has big patches that need reviewed I believe | 14:32 |
| tongli | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/kiloeyes | 14:33 |
| topol | #action luzC to see if we can get reviews speeded up | 14:33 |
| tongli | that repo was created for a different purpose, I own it but it is a openstack big tent project. | 14:33 |
| topol | tongli did your big patches get reviewed yet? | 14:33 |
| tongli | if we want to remake that repo, I am ok. | 14:34 |
| tongli | @topol, no. | 14:34 |
| markvoelker | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366784/ < tongli's big patch | 14:34 |
| markvoelker | tongli is this still WIP or has it settled now? I noticed several new patchsets coming in over the past couple of days after I initially reviewed it | 14:35 |
| tongli | mark reviewed the earlier version, but since then I have made a lot of changes, mainly to add ansible docker swarm tests | 14:35 |
| * markvoelker notes for future reference that it would probably be easier to attract core reviews if the changes were broken out into separate reviews...this patch does 3 different things. | 14:36 | |
| tongli | @markvoelker, now the patch is final, not WIP. | 14:36 |
| markvoelker | thanks | 14:36 |
| markvoelker | I'll review it again | 14:36 |
| luzC | me too | 14:36 |
| markvoelker | (and run it again) | 14:36 |
| tongli | @markvoelker, not plan to change anything unless something really bad found. | 14:36 |
| topol | given the foundation is most excited about this workload and its hopefully final, this problem may not be as big an issue | 14:37 |
| topol | does that seem correct to everyone? | 14:37 |
| topol | let's see if we can make the current repo work | 14:38 |
| topol | unless folks have a better suggestion? | 14:38 |
| topol | luzC, markvoelker, tongli thoughts? | 14:38 |
| markvoelker | Fine by me | 14:39 |
| luzC | +1 | 14:39 |
| topol | K | 14:39 |
| tongli | @topol, ok, I will keep sending the request for review emails to the defcore channel | 14:39 |
| topol | next topic | 14:39 |
| topol | #topic Tenant network assumption in the workloads | 14:39 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Tenant network assumption in the workloads (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)" | 14:39 | |
| tongli | probably going to piss off few, but brad will take them to lunch in barcelona. | 14:39 |
| topol | lunch, beers, both | 14:40 |
| topol | some vendors do not expose or support tenant network, lampstack workload has been modified to accommodate that setup. A tenant network is no longer needed | 14:40 |
| topol | so tongli, question on this | 14:40 |
| topol | when tenant network is no longer required you no longer use the security groups stuff correct? | 14:41 |
| tongli | security group is still needed. | 14:41 |
| tongli | when tenant network is not exposed, the script just does not use one. | 14:41 |
| rohit404 | ^ topol: nice to have the flexibility for non-tenant networks (provider networks i assume) | 14:42 |
| tongli | security groups created against like all hosts not on specific subnet. | 14:42 |
| tongli | it is more of flat network vs overlay network. | 14:43 |
| tongli | the script now handle both. | 14:43 |
| tongli | if you do not have a tenant network, leave that parameter blank. | 14:43 |
| topol | ok good. so even with the non-tenant network we don't lose our enterprise features with port egress and ingress? | 14:43 |
| tongli | but security group is required. | 14:43 |
| tongli | if your cloud does not allow security group, the script fails. | 14:43 |
| tongli | @topol, right. we do not lose anything. | 14:44 |
| tongli | will use whatever the cloud default to. | 14:44 |
| topol | tongli, ok good. so hopefully these changes allow more clouds to run the workload. | 14:44 |
| tongli | but security group is still required. | 14:44 |
| topol | ok cool. | 14:44 |
| tongli | rright. | 14:44 |
| tongli | right. | 14:44 |
| topol | thanks for doing this tongli | 14:45 |
| JASON__ | i suggest we need to check with cloud service guys | 14:45 |
| topol | next topic and its a biggie | 14:45 |
| topol | #topic Terraform falls over when multiple endpoints for a service (such as compute server) exist from a cloud, | 14:45 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Terraform falls over when multiple endpoints for a service (such as compute server) exist from a cloud, (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)" | 14:45 | |
| topol | so Tong ran into this in the OSIC cloud. | 14:46 |
| topol | appears to be a well know bug in TerraForm. | 14:46 |
| tongli | terraform has code specifically detect if a OS service has multiple endpoints, if there is, the code simply throw an error and quit | 14:46 |
| tongli | this is a problem I can not overcome by changing the work load scripts. | 14:46 |
| topol | and the only way Tong got around this was to create an Ansible playbooks for the docker swarm workload | 14:46 |
| topol | tongli did I get everything correct on this? | 14:47 |
| tongli | so I rewrote the work load scripts using ansible which also allows one to run work load a lot easier | 14:47 |
| markvoelker | For clarity: you mean like a cloud for which there are multiple regions? Or a cloud which supports both KEystone v2 and v3? Or...? | 14:47 |
| tongli | @markvoelker, not multiple regions. | 14:47 |
| * topol that question is for tong:-) | 14:47 | |
| topol | two nova endpoint versions? | 14:48 |
| tongli | @markvoelker, say your cloud in a region supports couple v2 and v2.1 endpoints, | 14:48 |
| tongli | terrafrom will fail in this case. | 14:48 |
| tongli | say your cloud supports both compute 2.0 and 2.1 endpoints, terrafrom will fail. | 14:49 |
| topol | so anyone know any terraform experts? | 14:49 |
| tongli | I suspect this will be quite common. OSIC does that, that is where I found the issue. | 14:49 |
| markvoelker | Is it checking the catalog, or just using what's in "GET / http://myapiserver:8774/" ? | 14:49 |
| tongli | @markvoelker, I think terraform OS cloud module checks against keystone to get various service endpoints. | 14:50 |
| tongli | you may notice in the work load tests, we only give keystone endpoint. | 14:50 |
| tongli | there is no any other endpoints given. cloud modules work under the cover for different service endpoints. | 14:50 |
| tongli | which is actually a good thing for interop. | 14:51 |
| tongli | this in a way testing how keystone works. | 14:51 |
| *** rohit404 has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| topol | so we can check with the bluebox team since they have experience with TerraForm. unless anyone knows of a better terraform guru | 14:51 |
| markvoelker | Ok, guess that explains why a lot of folks haven't run into this then. Most private cloud catalogs I see only contain one nova endpoint even if it supports v2 and v2.1. | 14:51 |
| tongli | as long as there is one end point per service , it is fine. | 14:52 |
| topol | markvoelker ++ but in OSIC its gameover :-) | 14:52 |
| tongli | does not matter 2.0 or 2.1 | 14:52 |
| tongli | but I can not be 100% sure. I also noticed that terraform states some version supports on openstack. | 14:52 |
| tongli | I am a bit worried about continuing using it. | 14:53 |
| tongli | vs ansible , it just uses shade. | 14:53 |
| topol | so tongli and I can check with our gurus. But tongli provided ansible because we are nervous about this | 14:53 |
| markvoelker | So topol, what's the ask here? You want us to re-run using the ansible version of the workload? | 14:53 |
| tongli | terraform was created using go lang, so the OS module will have to be recreated a lot of what shade does. | 14:53 |
| topol | hmmm. good question markvoelker | 14:54 |
| topol | what do you recommend? | 14:54 |
| * markvoelker notes that tong's patch referenced above contains the new code | 14:54 | |
| tongli | @markvoelker, I would say yes, if your cloud is already working with terraform and lampstack, | 14:54 |
| tongli | running ansible script takes even less time for docker swarm. | 14:54 |
| tongli | it will also show when the script started and how long it took to finish. | 14:55 |
| topol | that would be helpful if folks could try the new ansible script. if terraform already works my view is you still get the checkbox | 14:55 |
| topol | but under our lessons learned we need to flag this | 14:55 |
| tongli | the instruction is here for docker swarm. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366784/7/ansible/dockerswarm/README.md | 14:55 |
| markvoelker | IMHO it seems like there's some knowledge uncovered here that people would want to know about. | 14:55 |
| topol | markvoelker DEFINITELY | 14:56 |
| topol | markvoelker you are reading my mind | 14:56 |
| tongli | @markvoelker, +1 | 14:56 |
| markvoelker | I would kinda hate to see us tell people not to use the terraform version at all anymore if only a handful have run it so far and it's uncovered something interesting. | 14:56 |
| markvoelker | Personally I don't mind running both versions...they're quick. | 14:56 |
| topol | markvoelker cool | 14:56 |
| tongli | right. | 14:57 |
| topol | I agree. Let's ask folks to try and run both. | 14:57 |
| luzC | agree | 14:57 |
| tongli | if just use ansible one, you only need to setup ansible env. | 14:57 |
| topol | #action all try and run both terraform and ansible of docker swarm | 14:57 |
| tongli | not both ansible and terraform. | 14:57 |
| topol | okay last item | 14:57 |
| topol | #topic Tong needs to test on other folks public clouds ASAP. Here are the cloud Tong has tested against | 14:58 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Tong needs to test on other folks public clouds ASAP. Here are the cloud Tong has tested against (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)" | 14:58 | |
| topol | OSIC - lampstack and docker swarm both successful | 14:58 |
| topol | OVH - lampstack and docker swarm both successful | 14:58 |
| topol | IBM Bluebox - lampstack and docker swarm both successful | 14:58 |
| topol | RAX Public Cloud-As far as we can tell RAX public cloud does not support security groups LAMPStack will not run | 14:58 |
| topol | Mirantis ? | 14:58 |
| topol | Huawei ? | 14:58 |
| topol | any updates to this | 14:58 |
| topol | RAX public is an issue. | 14:58 |
| JASON__ | DT? | 14:58 |
| JASON__ | maybe | 14:58 |
| rarcea | so, for SUSE we are testing inhouse and will report the results soon | 14:58 |
| topol | JASON__ yes please :-) | 14:59 |
| tongli | RAX cloud does not support security group, both test won't run, not only lampstack. | 14:59 |
| topol | rarcea. cool let us know | 14:59 |
| topol | eglute need your guidance on RAX public | 14:59 |
| topol | #action tong and brad to ask eglute about running on RAX public and security group support | 14:59 |
| topol | so folks based on foundation input please try and run LAMPStack workload first since they will want to demo that | 15:00 |
| topol | #action all please prioritize testing of LAMPStack | 15:00 |
| tongli | I think Mr. Bryce is pretty happy with use of ansible. | 15:00 |
| tongli | he made some comments on ansible, do not remember exact words. | 15:01 |
| topol | I think we covered everything and we are out of time. pelase folks keep running workloads. Bug us if you need help!!! | 15:01 |
| topol | Thanks everyone! | 15:01 |
| JASON__ | thanks | 15:01 |
| topol | #endmeeting | 15:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 15:01 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Sep 14 15:01:57 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:01 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-09-14-14.00.html | 15:01 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-09-14-14.00.txt | 15:02 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-09-14-14.00.log.html | 15:02 |
| *** JASON__ has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| *** daibz has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
| *** lizdurst_ has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
| *** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 15:06 | |
| *** david-lyle_ has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
| *** hemnafk is now known as hemna | 15:10 | |
| *** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 15:34 | |
| *** catherine_d|1 has left #openstack-meeting-cp | 15:52 | |
| *** prateek has quit IRC | 15:55 | |
| *** Tetsuo_ has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
| *** reed_ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 16:32 | |
| *** reed_ has quit IRC | 16:54 | |
| *** MarkBaker has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** Kiall_ is now known as Kiall | 17:03 | |
| *** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 17:09 | |
| *** sajeesh has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
| *** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 19:24 | |
| *** prateek has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
| *** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 19:29 | |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 19:33 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 20:07 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-cp | 20:43 | |
| *** hemna is now known as hemnafk | 20:44 | |
| *** coolsvap has quit IRC | 20:52 | |
| *** rarcea has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
| *** hj-hpe has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
| *** uxdanielle has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** sdague has quit IRC | 23:02 | |
| *** xyang1 has quit IRC | 23:10 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!