| *** k_mouza has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:01 | |
| *** Liang__ has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
| *** Liang__ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:04 | |
| *** k_mouza has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
| *** dviroel has quit IRC | 00:08 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 00:16 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
| *** aostapenko has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| *** dwalt has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:57 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:11 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:12 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:13 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:17 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:19 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 02:34 | |
| *** macz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:40 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:40 | |
| *** macz has quit IRC | 02:45 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:03 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:22 | |
| *** senrique_ has quit IRC | 03:40 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:11 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:12 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:13 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 04:16 | |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 04:33 | |
| *** macz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:41 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 04:41 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 04:43 | |
| *** macz has quit IRC | 04:46 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
| *** evrardjp has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** evrardjp has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:34 | |
| *** macz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:41 | |
| *** macz has quit IRC | 05:45 | |
| *** macz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:58 | |
| *** macz has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
| *** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:03 | |
| *** bobmel has quit IRC | 06:08 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 06:16 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:08 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** macz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:24 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:26 | |
| *** macz has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:31 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:51 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 07:57 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:59 | |
| *** Liang__ has quit IRC | 08:22 | |
| *** Liang__ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:23 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:30 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:31 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:38 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:44 | |
| *** k_mouza has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:18 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:54 | |
| *** whoami-rajat is now known as whoami-rajat|lun | 10:12 | |
| *** whoami-rajat|lun is now known as whoami-rajat | 10:12 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 10:35 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| *** dviroel has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:43 | |
| *** whoami-rajat__ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:01 | |
| *** Liang__ has quit IRC | 13:03 | |
| *** Liang__ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:04 | |
| *** senrique_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:08 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:19 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
| *** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:51 | |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:57 | |
| rosmaita | Courtesy reminder: Cinder meeting in #openstack-meeting-4 at 1400 UTC | 13:58 |
|---|---|---|
| rosmaita | jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney walshh_ jbernard ^^ | 13:58 |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:59 | |
| rosmaita | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Feb 12 14:00:25 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rosmaita. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| whoami-rajat__ | Hi | 14:00 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
| lseki | hi | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| *** Liang__ is now known as LiangFang | 14:00 | |
| geguileo | hi! o/ | 14:00 |
| LiangFang | hi | 14:00 |
| jungleboyj | o/ | 14:00 |
| *** sfernand has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:00 | |
| rosmaita | hello everyone | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-ussuri-meetings | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | ok, let's get started | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | #topic announcements | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:02 | |
| *** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:02 | |
| rosmaita | #topic announcements - virtual midcycle -art 2 planning | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "announcements - virtual midcycle -art 2 planning (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:02 | |
| smcginnis | o/ | 14:03 |
| whoami-rajat__ | Part ? | 14:03 |
| whoami-rajat__ | Ok got it | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | whoami-rajat: ty, yes part 2 | 14:03 |
| senrique_ | o/ | 14:03 |
| senrique_ | o/ | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | first, I never reported on the virtual mid-cycle part 1 follow-up poll | 14:03 |
| *** senrique_ is now known as enriquetaso | 14:04 | |
| e0ne | hi | 14:04 |
| enriquetaso | o/ | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | hello sofia | 14:04 |
| sfernand | hi | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | sorry, i am having typing probs this morning | 14:04 |
| tosky | o/ | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | ok, closed the poll on 5 feb | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | had 9 responses | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | 5 from people not there, which was good, i wanted to know why they didn't attend | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | 2 had conflicts suddenly come up; 1 thought not relevant; 1 didn't know about it; 1 left 15 min early | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | so, maybe one extra announcement on the ML will help that | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | No suggestions for improving the format. | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | 1 person mentioned that 2 hours was a good length. | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | People who attended rated BlueJeans connection "pretty good to excellent." | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | so i think we should stick with this for part 2 | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | btw, i forgot to mention that jungleboyj uploaded the recording to the cinder youtube channel | 14:06 |
| jungleboyj | Yeah, I think BlueJeans works well and the resulting recordings are good. | 14:06 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | #link https://youtu.be/Dz28U1pQnqA | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | ok, so part 2 has been proposed for week of 16 March | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | (gives us 3 weeks before final ussuri release of client libraries) | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | my question today is: does anyone here know of a major conflict that week? | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | (i almost planned part 1 for the week of FOSDEM, so I wanted to check) | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | well, if you think of anything, let me know | 14:08 |
| jungleboyj | I am not aware of conflicts | 14:08 |
| jungleboyj | Can you share the link for the voting poll? | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | i'll put together a poll for day/time and send it out next week (probably after the meeting) | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | jungleboyj: you are 1 step ahead of me there | 14:08 |
| jungleboyj | Ah, not out yet. Sorry, misinterpreted the previous message. | 14:09 |
| *** IvensZambrano has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:09 | |
| rosmaita | np | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | #topic releases | 14:09 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "releases (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:09 | |
| rosmaita | this is week R-minus-13 and milestone 2 | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | #topic releases - cinder | 14:10 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "releases - cinder (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:10 | |
| rosmaita | we have about 260 changes since the stable/train branch | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | one major feature (glance multiple store support) | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | i'd like to do a milestone-2 release (even though we don't have to) | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | it will be our first python3-only release (would rather not wait until milestone-3 for that) | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | i took a quick look at the open patches, but didn't notice anything essential for M-2 | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/cinder+status:open+branch:master | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | so unless someone can point something out, i'll put up a release patch today | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | (you don't have to tell me right this minute) | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | i'll put up the patch around 20:00 UTC today unless i hear otherwise | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | #topic releases - python-cinderclient | 14:11 |
| *** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:11 | |
| *** openstack changes topic to "releases - python-cinderclient (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:11 | |
| rosmaita | the release team is pushing for a milestone-2 release | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | i think it's a good idea to get the py3-only release out even though there are not a lot of changes there | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | here's what we have open right now: | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-cinderclient+status:open+branch:master | 14:12 |
| *** dwalt has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:12 | |
| rosmaita | there are a few patches sitting with one +2 | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | so if reviewers have time, please take a look | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | i'll put up the patch for that one tomorrow | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | (actually, the patch is there, i will just revise it) | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | #topic releases - os-brick | 14:13 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "releases - os-brick (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:13 | |
| rosmaita | there are some things we should get in (like the cryptsetup password checking) | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | this one we can release next week | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/os-brick+status:open+branch:master | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | so, after you look over python-cinderclient, please direct your attention to os-brick | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | #topic releases - final rocky release | 14:14 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "releases - final rocky release (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:14 | |
| rosmaita | we need everything merged by 21 Feb (release must be ready for 24 Feb) | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | last i looked, there's not much | 14:15 |
| tosky | there may be a few pending backports iirc | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | right, so after you look at os-brick, please look at anything pending for stable/rocky | 14:15 |
| tosky | or at least going their way to rocky, so hurry up with backports if you also want to get them in the last rocky tarball | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | yes, if you have things on the way, please keep on top of them | 14:16 |
| smcginnis | Would be useful to do a sweep all the way from train backports to see if there is anything that needs to go all the way back. | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | any volunteers for ^^ ? | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | it's a good idea | 14:16 |
| smcginnis | Not the end of the world, but last chance to do it. | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | rocky is indeed a long way back | 14:16 |
| jungleboyj | I went through backports the other day and didn't see too many outstanding patches but may need to get more backported. | 14:16 |
| smcginnis | * last chance to do it and get in an official release | 14:16 |
| smcginnis | I started working on a script to automatically find bugfixes that have not been backported. Really should find where that went. | 14:17 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | right, the branch will go into "extended maintenance" mode -- no more releases, but we can still backport changes | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | anyway, if you have done an important bugfix recently, please assess it for backport-worthiness and get it proposed ASAP | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | ok, final announcement and then i will shut up | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | #topic volume-local-cache spec | 14:18 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "volume-local-cache spec (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:18 | |
| rosmaita | cross-project meeting with nova about volume-local-cache is tomorrow, 13:30-14:00 UTC | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | details are here: | 14:19 |
| LiangFang | thanks rosmaita | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-February/012457.html | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | LiangFang: np | 14:19 |
| *** knomura has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:19 | |
| LiangFang | I have replied some info in: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/volume-local-cache | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | ok, i will definitely take a look before the meeting | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | sorry about the weird time thing on that poll, btw | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | the reason for the middle of the night in europe time choices, though, was that only new york, mumbai, and shanghai time zones were mentioned when i asked in the meeting last week who might attend | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | i was trying to be creative, but forgot that it was like 2:30 am in europe | 14:21 |
| smcginnis | Not really a good way to include US and China without that happening. | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | anyway, 13:30 UTC seems to be ok for most people | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | yes, our geographic spread makes it really challenging to schedule stuff | 14:22 |
| LiangFang | not sure if eric will join or not | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | you mean eric fried? | 14:22 |
| LiangFang | eric honey | 14:22 |
| smcginnis | Or Harney. | 14:22 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 14:22 |
| LiangFang | smcginnis: yes | 14:22 |
| LiangFang | :) | 14:22 |
| jungleboyj | I Like Eric Honey | 14:22 |
| LiangFang | ... | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | well, we'll see what we can get done | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | ok, on to our regular topics, bunch of stuff on the agenda | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | #topic RSD Cinder Driver move to unsupported | 14:24 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "RSD Cinder Driver move to unsupported (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:24 | |
| rosmaita | IvensZambrano: that's you | 14:24 |
| IvensZambrano | thanks | 14:24 |
| IvensZambrano | hi everyone | 14:24 |
| jungleboyj | Hey IvensZambrano | 14:24 |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:24 | |
| IvensZambrano | Due to an org change the team I belong to is moving away from some of the activites we were supporting and performing for the project | 14:25 |
| rajinir | o/ | 14:25 |
| IvensZambrano | that includes the RSD cinder driver, the new proposal for the Swordfish driver and the changes proposed for os-brick | 14:25 |
| IvensZambrano | for NVMeoF | 14:26 |
| IvensZambrano | yes rajinir? | 14:26 |
| jungleboyj | :-( | 14:26 |
| smcginnis | Wasn't Mellanox also participating in some of that? | 14:26 |
| jungleboyj | Ok. | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | well, that's kind of a bummer | 14:27 |
| IvensZambrano | i'm not sure smcginnis, we were not directly interacting with them on those three items | 14:27 |
| rosmaita | sorry to hear it | 14:27 |
| jungleboyj | So, IvensZambrano brought this up to me last week. | 14:27 |
| IvensZambrano | it is, sorry to come with such announcements | 14:27 |
| smcginnis | Yeah, that's really too bad. | 14:27 |
| jungleboyj | Lenovo had been leveraging some of this work but when I raised it internally didn't get any concern. | 14:28 |
| jungleboyj | Thought we should bring it up here given that it is pretty new technology. | 14:28 |
| jungleboyj | Does this impact anyone else? | 14:28 |
| jungleboyj | Any concern from the distros? | 14:28 |
| smcginnis | Anyone at companies using this, now would be a good time to reach out internally and make sure they are aware of the impact of this. | 14:28 |
| jungleboyj | smcginnis: ++ | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | i guess a ML announcement would be in order, too | 14:29 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: Probably a good idea. | 14:29 |
| IvensZambrano | yes please, it will be good to know if any impacts to current usages of it will come | 14:29 |
| jungleboyj | I am really sorry to see the RedFish work being stopped. | 14:29 |
| IvensZambrano | as we are hosting the RSD Driver CI as well | 14:29 |
| jungleboyj | and Swordfish | 14:29 |
| IvensZambrano | and it will go off soon | 14:29 |
| e0ne | jungleboyj: +1 | 14:30 |
| rosmaita | ok, thanks for keeping us posted | 14:30 |
| IvensZambrano | well, there is always the option of handing over to another organisation the evolution of the Swordfish driver | 14:30 |
| jungleboyj | I shared the process for unsupporting. Guess whether it gets removed in the next release depends on the outcome of those other discussions. | 14:30 |
| IvensZambrano | that is a nice project and it is aligned to open standards | 14:30 |
| jungleboyj | IvensZambrano: ++ | 14:30 |
| jungleboyj | So, don't see anyone super concerned here. | 14:31 |
| rosmaita | i guess we have until M-3 to get it sorted out | 14:31 |
| smcginnis | Are there storage devices supporting Swordfish yet? | 14:32 |
| rosmaita | maybe everyone is shocked? | 14:32 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 14:32 |
| IvensZambrano | we were using an intermediate software layer for our development but the end goal was to extend the BMCs at some point to natively support SF | 14:33 |
| *** anastzhyr has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:33 | |
| rosmaita | IvensZambrano: do you want to send something to the operators list, or do you want me to? | 14:33 |
| jungleboyj | We should get an e-mail out there somewhere. | 14:34 |
| IvensZambrano | rosmaita: what is the usual procedure? | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | not sure exactly | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | tell you what, we can collaborate on an etherpad and i can send something out | 14:35 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: ++ That sounds like a good plan. | 14:35 |
| IvensZambrano | rosmaita: thanks! that will be great | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | i want to make sure i get the detals right, especially about who to contact if they are interested in picking up the SF work | 14:35 |
| jungleboyj | IvensZambrano: Thanks for being proactive and communicating with us. | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | yes, thanks | 14:36 |
| IvensZambrano | now I'm more sad to leave the project with this great support | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | IvensZambrano: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swordfish-and-stuff | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | jungleboyj: ^^ | 14:36 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: It is working ;-) | 14:36 |
| IvensZambrano | rosmaita: thanks! | 14:36 |
| jungleboyj | IvensZambrano: Sad to see you go. Enjoyed the bit we got to work together. | 14:37 |
| IvensZambrano | jungleboyj: thanks as well for the collaboration the past few days! | 14:37 |
| IvensZambrano | davidsha: anything to add? | 14:37 |
| IvensZambrano | you were actively collaborating with the project from our team | 14:38 |
| davidsha | It's been a pleasure working with you all, and hope we get to collaborate again in the future! | 14:38 |
| rosmaita | davidsha: likewise! | 14:39 |
| IvensZambrano | thank you all! | 14:39 |
| rosmaita | ok, thanks for that sad announcement | 14:39 |
| rosmaita | #topic Backport Policy: Should we backport the Incremental Backup patch? | 14:39 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Backport Policy: Should we backport the Incremental Backup patch? (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:39 | |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705553/ | 14:39 |
| rosmaita | enriquetaso: this one is you | 14:39 |
| enriquetaso | hi | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | hello | 14:40 |
| enriquetaso | I think there is some misunderstood between the incremental patch. The patch is changing object version and because of that It may be seen as a new feature. I would like to discuss if backporting the patch is a good idea for us : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705553/ | 14:40 |
| smcginnis | I would say that's a bug since the end user could specify --incremental and have no idea it didn't do what they expected. | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | smcginnis: ++ | 14:40 |
| enriquetaso | ++ | 14:40 |
| enriquetaso | On the other hand, rosmaita showed me this reported bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1862635 related to the incremental patch. I didn't tought about it at the time and having CI with c-bak disable didn't help.. So, i'm working on a fix. | 14:40 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1862635 in Cinder "Cinder backup export broken" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Sofia Enriquez (lsofia-enriquez) | 14:40 |
| e0ne | smcginnis: +1 | 14:40 |
| e0ne | is't somewhere between a feature and a bug | 14:41 |
| jungleboyj | smcginnis: ++ | 14:41 |
| smcginnis | That does raise the point again - in most tempest runs, cinder backup has been disabled because it was constantly failing. | 14:41 |
| rosmaita | yeah, my point about the bug is that we'll want to backport that too if we decide to backport the original change | 14:41 |
| smcginnis | We should really fix that (tm). | 14:41 |
| e0ne | from users' perspective it's a bug fix without any new CLI flags, config options or API changes | 14:41 |
| jungleboyj | Should we add that to our Logo? | 14:42 |
| smcginnis | ;) | 14:42 |
| e0ne | :) | 14:42 |
| enriquetaso | :P | 14:42 |
| smcginnis | That's what the horse is looking over its shoulder at! | 14:42 |
| jungleboyj | Yep. That was what I was thinking. | 14:42 |
| enriquetaso | rosmaita++ sounds like a good plan | 14:42 |
| rosmaita | i think e0ne clearly stated the reason why its backportable | 14:42 |
| e0ne | rosmaita: thanks :) | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | e0ne++ | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | ok, good ... wanted to discuss this because of an objection on enriquetaso's backport patch | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | but it sounds like we are in agreement here | 14:43 |
| smcginnis | One nit-ish thing - best not to propose backports to older branches until the patch is merged to the more recent branch. | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | smcginnis, yes, sorry | 14:43 |
| smcginnis | I know folks want to make sure it's everywhere, but that puts the burden on reviewers to make sure things don't get messed up for stable policy. | 14:44 |
| jungleboyj | smcginnis: ++ | 14:44 |
| smcginnis | Not a huge deal, just wanted to point that out. | 14:44 |
| jungleboyj | Otherwise it sounds fine to backport. | 14:44 |
| jungleboyj | Hey, Red Hat made a logo for cinderlib. :-) | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | smcginnis: thank you for noticing that | 14:44 |
| enriquetaso | where is the cinderlib logo ? :O | 14:45 |
| *** IvensZambrano has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:45 | |
| jungleboyj | In a presentation I am watching. | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | ok, so the consensus is: is backportable along with the related bugfix (after the bug is fixed); needs to go in the regular backport order T->S->R | 14:46 |
| rosmaita | jungleboyj: is multitasking! | 14:46 |
| smcginnis | ++ | 14:46 |
| jungleboyj | ++ | 14:46 |
| rosmaita | ok, enriquetaso -- all your questions answered? | 14:46 |
| enriquetaso | yes | 14:46 |
| enriquetaso | thanks | 14:46 |
| rosmaita | great, this is exciting, we can have open discussion! | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | #topic open discussion | 14:47 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:47 | |
| rosmaita | actually, I have something | 14:47 |
| whoami-rajat | i forgot to mention before, i've a patch that i want it to go to rocky release https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707343/ | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | whoami-rajat: did you figure out the problem with lower-constraints ? | 14:48 |
| whoami-rajat | yep, unrelated | 14:48 |
| whoami-rajat | its currently passing on zuul jobs | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | ok, cool -- i dind't notice the recheck | 14:49 |
| jungleboyj | Ok. LGTM when it passes the check. | 14:49 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks!! | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | i remember looking at the patch to master, i think this should be fine | 14:49 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: Don't need any discussion on the Datera driver? | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | i haven't heard anything back yet | 14:49 |
| jungleboyj | Ok. | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | but not to keep people in suspense | 14:50 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | Datera has got their CI running again, and are proposing that their driver be marked supported in U | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | there is some discussion on that patch | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | which i can't find the link to atm | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | anyway, things are kind of up in the air, but will hopefully be resolved ok | 14:52 |
| smcginnis | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704153/ | 14:52 |
| rosmaita | ty | 14:52 |
| rosmaita | part of the problem is python2 compatibility | 14:52 |
| smcginnis | I really would like to see that broken out into multiple patches, but I think I've said enough on that patch. :| | 14:53 |
| rosmaita | yes, and i did mention that to them | 14:53 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | i think part of the problem is that they'd like to fix the driver in U and then be able to have people use it with N through T also | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | not sure how viable a plan that is | 14:54 |
| smcginnis | Another scary part of all that. | 14:55 |
| jungleboyj | :-( That is scary. | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | and i think that's part of the big monolithic patch | 14:55 |
| e0ne | rosmaita: +1 | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | because i think they're thinking they need to backport all that stuff everywhere | 14:55 |
| jungleboyj | Ouch. That won't work. | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | instead of having multiple small patches and only backporting the appropriate stuff | 14:55 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: ++ | 14:56 |
| jungleboyj | Maybe communicating that better to them will help. | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | but, of course, it's easy to say after they've done a bunch of work: break it into smaller pieces! | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | it's pretty hard to hear that when you've done all the work! | 14:56 |
| jungleboyj | True. | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | so we'll see what happens | 14:56 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: Thanks for following up. | 14:57 |
| jungleboyj | One other topic. | 14:57 |
| smcginnis | Well, all of those changes built up over time in their GitHub fork, so theoretically they could port over commits from there piecemeal. | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | ok, one thing from me for people running Train or who know such people | 14:57 |
| jungleboyj | smcginnis: ++ | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | this patch has been rejected for nova (i'm working on a more robust fix) | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | but the release note is worth looking at: | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706298/1 | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | it's about a problem that arises in a really weird situation with our automatic encryption key handling (it was actually a change in glance, but really for us) | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | anyway, it can be addressed immediately by a nova config change | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | i will be sending out something to the operators list | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | but if you are running Train, or know people who are, you might want to bring it to the appropriate person's attention | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | that's it from me | 14:58 |
| LiangFang | previously i mentioned there's a white paper of volume local cache. Now it is approved to publish. But it is in chinese, co-authored by China Unicom. Mainly shows the performance gain with Optane SSD. Will upload the writepaper to some website later and let team know. Does openstack.org has some place to containing write paper? | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | 1.75 minutes left | 14:58 |
| trident | One other topic as well if I may, I filed a bug a souple of days ago. I intend to write a patch for it but would at some point apreciate some discussions on the best way to architect the fix. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1862636 | 14:58 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1862636 in Cinder "cinder retype corrupts volume in some scenarios" [Undecided,New] | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | that doesn't sound good | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | trident: thanks for reporting it | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | and glad to hear you want to fix it, too! | 14:59 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: Have you polled the team to see who is planning to be in Vancouver? | 14:59 |
| jungleboyj | Think we need to let OSF know if we are going to be there soon. | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | i have not, and the table planning is due feb 21 i think | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | show of hands: who is probably going to be in vancouver? | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 15:00 |
| jungleboyj | o/ Planning to be. | 15:00 |
| enriquetaso | i don't know | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | actually, i don't know either | 15:01 |
| smcginnis | Probably. No official word yet. | 15:01 |
| enriquetaso | u.u | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | it's kind of early | 15:01 |
| whoami-rajat | :P | 15:01 |
| jungleboyj | Don't need to know for sure. Just need to know how many want to attend. | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | i think the same size table we had in shanghai will be good | 15:01 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: ++ | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | which was what, 12 seats? | 15:01 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita, ++ | 15:01 |
| jungleboyj | Lets do a ML post and see what kind of response we get. | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | ok, i'll get one out this afternoon | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | thanks everyone! | 15:02 |
| jungleboyj | Thanks! | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | jungleboyj: thanks for the reminder | 15:02 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 15:02 |
| whoami-rajat | Thanks! | 15:02 |
| jungleboyj | That is what I am here for. | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | :D | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | #endmeeting | 15:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:02 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Feb 12 15:02:39 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:02 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2020/cinder.2020-02-12-14.00.html | 15:02 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2020/cinder.2020-02-12-14.00.txt | 15:02 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2020/cinder.2020-02-12-14.00.log.html | 15:02 |
| *** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:03 | |
| *** knomura has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** macz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:43 | |
| *** macz has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| *** macz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:44 | |
| *** macz has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| *** igordc has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:17 | |
| *** whoami-rajat__ has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** evrardjp has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
| *** evrardjp has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:34 | |
| *** k_mouza has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| *** anastzhyr has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** davidsha has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
| *** rosmaita has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:53 | |
| *** igordc has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
| *** igordc has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:23 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:41 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 19:17 | |
| *** anastzhyr has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:31 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:39 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:40 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 19:52 | |
| *** igordc has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
| *** LiangFang has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
| *** Adri2000 has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
| *** dviroel has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:49 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:54 | |
| *** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:55 | |
| *** bobmel has quit IRC | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!