| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
| *** Dantalion has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
| *** igordc has quit IRC | 00:24 | |
| *** igordc has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:25 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 00:31 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:31 | |
| *** igordc has quit IRC | 00:31 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 00:46 | |
| *** igordc has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:58 | |
| *** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:10 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
| *** iyamahat has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:39 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 01:52 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:59 | |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:02 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:15 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 02:46 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:47 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:50 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 02:54 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:00 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:01 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 03:15 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:36 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:11 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 04:12 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 04:15 | |
| *** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:35 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:46 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:50 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:55 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 05:19 | |
| *** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:48 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 05:50 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:11 | |
| *** gcheresh has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:15 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 06:16 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:19 | |
| *** igordc has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
| *** witek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:43 | |
| *** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:46 | |
| *** witek has quit IRC | 06:47 | |
| *** gcheresh has quit IRC | 06:52 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 06:55 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:03 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:07 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:14 | |
| *** gcheresh has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:17 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 07:19 | |
| *** witek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:30 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:42 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:45 | |
| *** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:50 | |
| *** Dantalion has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:56 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:07 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 08:11 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:23 | |
| *** witek has quit IRC | 08:33 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:55 | |
| *** k_mouza has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:17 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 09:43 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:46 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 10:50 | |
| *** k_mouza has quit IRC | 10:52 | |
| *** k_mouza has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 10:53 | |
| *** liuyulong has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:32 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:44 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:46 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:54 | |
| *** seajay has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:57 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:17 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:18 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 12:22 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 12:25 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:29 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 12:30 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:30 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:31 | |
| *** ktibi has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:58 | |
| *** jchhatbar has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:00 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:01 | |
| *** ktibi has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
| *** ktibi has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:07 | |
| *** jchhatbar has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
| *** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:10 | |
| *** howell has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:11 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:20 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:20 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:21 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:25 | |
| *** ktibi has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:32 | |
| *** abhishekk has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:36 | |
| *** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:37 | |
| *** mjturek has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:39 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:40 | |
| *** ktibi has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:42 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:44 | |
| *** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:46 | |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:48 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
| jokke_ | #startmeeting glance | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Mar 14 14:00:25 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jokke_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'glance' | 14:00 |
| jokke_ | #topic roll-call | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "roll-call (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:00 | |
| jokke_ | o/ | 14:00 |
| jokke_ | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:01 |
| abhishekk | o/ | 14:01 |
| lpetrut | o/ | 14:02 |
| jokke_ | hey all | 14:02 |
| jokke_ | #topic updates | 14:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "updates (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:03 | |
| jokke_ | Soo we're on FF after the extended merge them features now we agreed last week. | 14:03 |
| abhishekk | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-stein-milestone-3 | 14:04 |
| abhishekk | current status ^^ | 14:04 |
| jokke_ | I think lpetrut's work on the Windows compatibility is the last thing that is not purely bugfix we will consider | 14:04 |
| abhishekk | yes | 14:04 |
| jokke_ | I don't think we have any FFE requests on anything else. We have some bugfixes pending but in general we're looking pretty good | 14:05 |
| abhishekk | also do we need FF for visibility? | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | was just going to ask | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | that may need to be postponed to train | 14:05 |
| jokke_ | We need to drop Tempest gating for that | 14:05 |
| abhishekk | agree | 14:05 |
| lpetrut | thanks a lot for your help on this. some updates on this matter: we're almost done with the CI | 14:05 |
| abhishekk | cool | 14:06 |
| jokke_ | Which is yet again topic on my PTG list. | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | i will help with that, we need a strategy | 14:06 |
| jokke_ | But lets move on and we can discuss the more pressing current matters under their slots | 14:07 |
| jokke_ | #topic release updates | 14:07 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "release updates (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:07 | |
| abhishekk | We need to release glance milestone 3 today as agreed in last week | 14:07 |
| jokke_ | Client got release last week on time and we did not release the milestone 3 | 14:07 |
| abhishekk | python-glanceclient --> Version 2.16.0 released last week | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | \o/ | 14:08 |
| abhishekk | for milestone 3, we need releasenotes patch, then need to regenerate sample config, and release patch | 14:09 |
| jokke_ | I think the big question is do we have something we need the milestone 3 tag for? | 14:09 |
| jokke_ | RC1 is next week | 14:09 |
| jokke_ | tags are cheap, I'm not saying we definitely should not do that, but do we have any benefit for tagging it? | 14:10 |
| abhishekk | is it possible that we can release RC1 direct? | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | that's a question for sean, but i believe we can | 14:10 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: yes, as of this cycle forward there is no need to tag milestones | 14:10 |
| jokke_ | only reason we did need the milestone tagging was for the db migrations to work | 14:11 |
| abhishekk | cool, then I guess apart from cache-manage utility we don't have any major feature in this release | 14:11 |
| jokke_ | As of release model, the Integrated release with milestones changed to kind of Integrated release with possible milestones | 14:11 |
| abhishekk | yeah, then we need to submit the patch to open the migration for Train release | 14:12 |
| jokke_ | yes, that will be around Train-1 | 14:12 |
| abhishekk | ack | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | or when that test breaks the gate | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | which i forget what exactly it looks for | 14:13 |
| jokke_ | or that ^^ ;D | 14:13 |
| abhishekk | :D | 14:13 |
| jokke_ | I think we did merge the instructions into the release liaison document | 14:13 |
| abhishekk | jokke_, it was already there | 14:14 |
| jokke_ | but it definitely should not blow up this week so lets move on unless there is something else about releases? | 14:14 |
| jokke_ | Ohh, how are the periodical gates looking? Still just sporadical timeouts? | 14:14 |
| abhishekk | yes, 6 failures in last week | 14:15 |
| abhishekk | all are timeouts | 14:15 |
| abhishekk | I have added this topic in PTG discussion etherpad | 14:15 |
| jokke_ | hmm-m that's like double what we had week before iirc | 14:15 |
| jokke_ | sounds like the gate load plays a role in there as well | 14:15 |
| abhishekk | we might opt help from infra guys? | 14:15 |
| abhishekk | that's it from release updates topic | 14:16 |
| abhishekk | are we going to tag m3 today or RC1 directly | 14:16 |
| jokke_ | I think it's at least worth of discussing. We definitely have the data to show now when we have had stable situation for a while | 14:16 |
| abhishekk | right | 14:17 |
| jokke_ | Like said I don't mind either way. Does anyone have any compelling arguments for or against tagging m-3? | 14:17 |
| jokke_ | I guess not. Lets skip it and focus to get good RC1 out next week then! | 14:18 |
| abhishekk | sorry to say, suddenly there are 8-10 failures for periodic jobs | 14:18 |
| abhishekk | functional-py35 create: /home/zuul/src/git.openstack.org/openstack/glance/.tox/functional-py35 | 14:18 |
| abhishekk | ERROR: InterpreterNotFound: python3.5 | 14:18 |
| abhishekk | ___________________________________ summary ____________________________________ | 14:18 |
| abhishekk | ERROR: functional-py35: InterpreterNotFound: python3.5 | 14:18 |
| jokke_ | ^^ looks definitely like Infra issue | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | they changed some images or something recently | 14:19 |
| abhishekk | #link http://zuul.openstack.org/builds?pipeline=periodic&project=openstack%2Fglance | 14:19 |
| abhishekk | yes | 14:19 |
| jokke_ | thanks abhishekk | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | thierry said something about it on the ML, though not that exact issue | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | forget that, it was a gpg key issue | 14:20 |
| jokke_ | ok, moving on | 14:20 |
| jokke_ | #topic feature Freeze | 14:20 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "feature Freeze (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:20 | |
| jokke_ | So we have those couple of patches lpetrut had to rebase there still hanging | 14:21 |
| jokke_ | How is it looking ot get those reviewed? | 14:21 |
| lpetrut | those have entered the gate | 14:21 |
| abhishekk | one patch needs to be reviewed where he has added time.sleep in tests | 14:22 |
| abhishekk | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643336/1 | 14:22 |
| lpetrut | yep, I've marked that as WIP as there's still one case that I'll need to fix | 14:22 |
| lpetrut | so this got me wondering, did you have such problems before? I mean, due to the timestamps | 14:22 |
| abhishekk | AFAIK, never | 14:23 |
| jokke_ | lpetrut: I can't recall at least. The good thing about that patch is that it's touching tests only | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | no, usually the functional tests are slow enough | 14:23 |
| lpetrut | interesting, good to know | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | what i mean is, we haven't had to worry about instantaneous updates in the functional tests | 14:23 |
| jokke_ | ^^ | 14:24 |
| lpetrut | yeah, I'm not sure if it's just very fast or the clock is inaccurate :) | 14:24 |
| jokke_ | At this point we need to put full focus on nailing the bugs down. Stuff like the test hardenings are great for this time of the cycle | 14:25 |
| lpetrut | and sorry to ask, but do gate tests run on bare metal? | 14:25 |
| jokke_ | Shall we have bug smash around the weekend, Monday maybe? | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | lpetrut: i don't think the tests run on bare metal | 14:25 |
| jokke_ | lpetrut: no they mostly don't | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | though, maybe occasionally | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | i think in general they are running on "donated" VMs | 14:26 |
| abhishekk | yes | 14:26 |
| jokke_ | there is some baremetal testing but like rosmaita said mainly zuul respins VMs | 14:26 |
| lpetrut | got it, thanks | 14:27 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: was your yes for lpetrut or bug smash? Sorry I mixed up the discussion here a bit | 14:27 |
| abhishekk | bug smash | 14:27 |
| jokke_ | cool. And I hope you're feeling better | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | quick question about lpetrut: how do we feel about the sleeps? just let them through? | 14:28 |
| abhishekk | yes, better and better | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | they are very small sleeps | 14:28 |
| lpetrut | I thought that a few ms should be negligeable. mocking complicate the code and cause other issues | 14:28 |
| lpetrut | I can make them optional (e.g. have a separate method for that, something like .add_delay) | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | i agree, don't want to mock too much stuff in functional tests | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | maybe let's just leave them in so we can get the rest merged and people can start testing it | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | do the optimizations as a followup patch | 14:29 |
| jokke_ | As long as the delays are not in a places where we would expect catching real issues like race conditions I'm fine having them in tests | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | well, they are db updates, so race condition city | 14:30 |
| jokke_ | ok, lets review them carefully and see if we should perhaps make sure the test reflects real life scenario enough. | 14:31 |
| abhishekk | ok | 14:31 |
| jokke_ | if it's testing issue I'm fine with delaying them, if it's something we should fix to make sure it's atomic change, lets fix it :D | 14:32 |
| abhishekk | Do lpetrut need to send FFE mail as per standard? | 14:32 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: like said earlier these are testing hardening/bug fixing. Perfect for this time. I don't see new features introduced here | 14:32 |
| abhishekk | cool | 14:33 |
| rosmaita | yeah, but we need these test fixes for the other stuff to merge, right? | 14:33 |
| jokke_ | rosmaita: I think they are not prerequisite for the stuff gating atm. but for the windows ci to run | 14:33 |
| jokke_ | lpetrut: correct me if I'm wrong | 14:34 |
| jokke_ | ok, moving on | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | in that case, it would be cool if lpetrut did the optimization of only sleeping if running on windows | 14:35 |
| jokke_ | #topic py3 glance_store issue | 14:35 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "py3 glance_store issue (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:35 | |
| jokke_ | rosmaita: this was yours | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/620234/ | 14:36 |
| abhishekk | rosmaita, I will try to have a look at test patch today (or may be tomorrow) | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | abhishekk: don't i have another idea on that | 14:36 |
| abhishekk | great | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | i will be changing the patch a bit, had an idea while at the dentist this morning | 14:36 |
| abhishekk | :D | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | anyway, i just want to push the above | 14:37 |
| jokke_ | rosmaita: ok what you had in mind? | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | well, mainly i need two +2s | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | :) | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | or need to find out that this is unacceptable | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | i would like to close this out ASAP | 14:38 |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
| jokke_ | Just bit of a background. We had discussion with rosmaita about this patch and what Tim said about monitoring the result returned from that read | 14:38 |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:39 | |
| rosmaita | yeah, the basic idea is that i want to keep this patch as small as possible, that is, don't want it to mask any other problems | 14:39 |
| jokke_ | So Tim's proposal was instead of faking the zero read to check every response we get from the reads and if it's anything but actual data coming in, replacing it | 14:39 |
| lpetrut | such a bad time to run out of battery :) without 634007, we cannot run the tests on Widndows (currently in the gate), while 643336 fixes unit tests. sorry for going off topic | 14:39 |
| jokke_ | and that's exctly why we came to the conclusion that faking the zero read instead of replacing something that executed code returns to us would be the better way to go | 14:40 |
| jokke_ | That way we will catch possible future issues while we try to find out what is the actual root cause | 14:41 |
| rosmaita | yes, so we just need sean or abhishek to agree with jokke_ | 14:41 |
| abhishekk | yes makes sense to me | 14:41 |
| rosmaita | in the meantime, i am trying to get functional tests that catch this | 14:41 |
| jokke_ | and we left the bug open, so the commit message is pointing to related-bug not closes-bug | 14:42 |
| abhishekk | and the note added by rosmaita helps better to understand it | 14:42 |
| jokke_ | so we have reminder that we actually need to figure out what's crapping us in the first place. This change will just fix this specific issue so we can release and indeed work with py3 | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | i'll add some comments to the bug | 14:43 |
| jokke_ | great, I think this is beaten, lets move on | 14:43 |
| abhishekk | great | 14:43 |
| jokke_ | #topic data remains in staging | 14:44 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "data remains in staging (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:44 | |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: this is something you've been working on | 14:44 |
| *** dangtrinhnt_x has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:44 | |
| abhishekk | jokke_, yes | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | i put it on the agenda for abhishekk | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | i want to make sure we are all ok with the way the problem is handled | 14:44 |
| jokke_ | And I think rosmaita pointed out very well that the staging should not be relying deployment store enablements | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | i think it's fine | 14:44 |
| abhishekk | yesterday Me and rosmaita had a discussion about how to fix this | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | and we will be refactoring this for Train | 14:44 |
| jokke_ | ok | 14:45 |
| abhishekk | ++ | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | but this fix i think needs to go back to rocky | 14:45 |
| jokke_ | so we go as it is for now and keep it in the agenda of PTG discussions how we do this finally? | 14:45 |
| abhishekk | I have tested this for single store and multiple store and it is working | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | so i do have a question for abhishek, though | 14:45 |
| abhishekk | please shoot | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | you found in testing that using _build_store() to create the store to delete from modified teh "real" store | 14:46 |
| rosmaita | but why does it work in the api in the /stage call? | 14:46 |
| abhishekk | just give me a minute | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | sure, or we can discuss later | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | just wanted to determine whether we need to change the code in /stage also for now | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | i don't think so | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | but it is kind of weird, i am missing something | 14:47 |
| jokke_ | The staging code at least used to work in a way that it created new store object, owerwrote the config on that, so the config change stayed local on that object | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | right | 14:48 |
| abhishekk | in staging code we are creating file store instance and calling add method of file store directly | 14:48 |
| jokke_ | it is worst kind of black magic wizardry you can do in OOP | 14:49 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: and I think that was rosmaita's point on the comment, we should do the same on the cleanup. Just create the object with overwritten config and call it's delete directly | 14:50 |
| abhishekk | to call delete method of filestore we need to pass location object to delete method | 14:50 |
| jokke_ | instead of relying the store library to figure out how to get to the path | 14:50 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: ohhh | 14:50 |
| abhishekk | and it is so weired to create a location object on the fly | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | this is related, i think this will be a problem: https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/api/v2/image_data.py#L76 | 14:51 |
| jokke_ | so we would need to do even more hackstery to create that bloody object | 14:51 |
| jokke_ | ok, then I agree. Lets keep this simple for now and do it properly in Train | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | i think get_location_from_uri requires the scheme to be "registered" | 14:51 |
| abhishekk | yes, so instead of that I have kept it simple | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | i think we need to do unlink that that _unstage function | 14:52 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: would you mind to write me an mail about this whole scenario and the reasons why it sucks? ;) I'd like to have this explained in known issues section of the release notes | 14:52 |
| abhishekk | rosmaita, right, and if I register it and if there is filestore in the 'stores' conf option then all images will be stored in staging area :D as it will override | 14:52 |
| *** hrw has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:52 | |
| abhishekk | jokke_, sure | 14:52 |
| jokke_ | great | 14:53 |
| *** dangtrinhnt_x has quit IRC | 14:53 | |
| jokke_ | ok, so lets stick with the current and explain in documentation. | 14:53 |
| abhishekk | I will draft a mail within a hour after the meeting | 14:53 |
| jokke_ | this should get easier once we get to utilize those reserved stores on multistore for it | 14:54 |
| abhishekk | yes, way easy | 14:54 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: no rush, I need it like before the final release :D | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | ok, so i get it ... the problem is having to use the location for delete | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | have i mentioned that i really hate image locations recently? | 14:55 |
| abhishekk | #MeToo | 14:55 |
| abhishekk | :D | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | meaning "recently mentioned" not "recently hated" | 14:55 |
| jokke_ | rosmaita: and not only location, which we know, but the store delete expecting properly formed location object | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | i have hated them for a very long time | 14:55 |
| jokke_ | yeah same | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | ok, so to summarize: | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | creating the store in /stage is fine | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | probably a problem wiht the _unstage method in the image_data controller for the delete, though | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | in the task, abhishek's code is doing the right thing to just manually delete the stuff from teh staging area | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | the end | 14:56 |
| jokke_ | yeah 3 min for open discussion | 14:57 |
| jokke_ | #topic open discussion | 14:57 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: glance)" | 14:57 | |
| jokke_ | rosmaita: so just to clarify, the glance_store needs the store type to be enabled to be able to form the location object from the uri to pass to the delete ... in nutshell that's the current problem :D | 14:57 |
| abhishekk | correct | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | right | 14:58 |
| jokke_ | anything else? | 14:58 |
| abhishekk | nope | 14:58 |
| jokke_ | oh yeah | 14:58 |
| abhishekk | You need to send mail for PTL candidacy | 14:59 |
| jokke_ | #agreed Bug scrub day at Monday! Lets go through our open bugs and make sure we haven't missed anything critical | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | jokke_: what abhishekk said!!! | 14:59 |
| abhishekk | just to update, I have submitted specs for nova and cinder to use multiple backned of glance | 14:59 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: I already submitted my candidacy to the elections repo ;) | 14:59 |
| jokke_ | abhishekk: Amazing! | 14:59 |
| abhishekk | jokke_, great | 14:59 |
| jokke_ | ok, time ... we can continue on #os-glance | 15:00 |
| jokke_ | thanks all | 15:00 |
| abhishekk | thank you all | 15:00 |
| jokke_ | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:00 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Mar 14 15:00:43 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2019/glance.2019-03-14-14.00.html | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2019/glance.2019-03-14-14.00.txt | 15:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2019/glance.2019-03-14-14.00.log.html | 15:00 |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| *** rosmaita has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:05 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:06 | |
| *** roman_g_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:07 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 15:11 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
| *** gcheresh has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
| *** hamzy has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:57 | |
| *** premsankar has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:01 | |
| *** Luzi has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:05 | |
| *** gibi has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
| *** gibi has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:38 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
| *** gkadam_ has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| *** ktibi has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
| *** abhishekk has quit IRC | 16:54 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:59 | |
| *** hamzy has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:09 | |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** k_mouza has quit IRC | 17:41 | |
| *** igordc has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:45 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:46 | |
| *** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:48 | |
| *** ktibi has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:50 | |
| *** iyamahat has quit IRC | 17:50 | |
| *** ktibi has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
| *** k_mouza has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:08 | |
| *** k_mouza has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
| *** iyamahat_ has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
| *** yamahata has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
| *** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:29 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
| *** notmyname has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
| *** roman_g_ has quit IRC | 18:39 | |
| *** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:39 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:40 | |
| *** gmann is now known as gmann_afk | 18:51 | |
| *** hamzy has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
| *** howell has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
| *** mjturek has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
| *** seajay has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 22:21 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
| *** gmann_afk is now known as gmann | 22:40 | |
| *** pmesserli has quit IRC | 23:02 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 23:25 | |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:42 | |
| *** k_mouza has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:46 | |
| *** k_mouza has quit IRC | 23:51 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!