| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:11 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
| *** d0ugal has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
| *** hippiepete has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
| *** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:27 | |
| *** tuanla____ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:40 | |
| *** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 00:47 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:06 | |
| *** seajay has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:34 | |
| *** kiennt26 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:36 | |
| *** yujunz has quit IRC | 01:40 | |
| *** seajay has quit IRC | 01:40 | |
| *** seajay has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:41 | |
| *** seajay has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
| *** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 01:55 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:03 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:46 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:46 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 02:46 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 02:47 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:09 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:10 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:10 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:10 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:11 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:13 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:14 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:15 | |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:16 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 03:24 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:25 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 03:58 | |
| *** janonymous has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:01 | |
| *** yujunz has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 04:19 | |
| *** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:31 | |
| *** yujunz has quit IRC | 04:35 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
| *** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 04:57 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:04 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 05:12 | |
| *** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:28 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:33 | |
| *** shaohe_feng has quit IRC | 05:38 | |
| *** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:42 | |
| *** yboaron has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:47 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:52 | |
| *** arcolife has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:57 | |
| *** junboli has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 05:58 | |
| *** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:00 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 06:17 | |
| *** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:18 | |
| *** yamahata has quit IRC | 06:32 | |
| *** yujunz has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:38 | |
| *** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:38 | |
| *** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:51 | |
| *** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 06:54 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 06:55 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:04 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:07 | |
| *** Kevin_Zheng has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** Dmitrii-Sh has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** chigang_ has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** ChrisPriceAB has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** mgkwill has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** margaret has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** diablo_rojo_phon has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** mgkwill has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:13 | |
| *** margaret has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:13 | |
| *** chigang_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:13 | |
| *** ChrisPriceAB has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:14 | |
| *** diablo_rojo_phon has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:14 | |
| *** Kevin_Zheng has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:16 | |
| *** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:36 | |
| *** karthiks has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 07:36 | |
| *** arcolife has quit IRC | 07:42 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 07:51 | |
| *** lihi has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:00 | |
| oanson | #startmeeting Dragonflow | 08:00 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Mon Jan 8 08:00:11 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is oanson. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 08:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 08:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Dragonflow)" | 08:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'dragonflow' | 08:00 |
| snapiri | Hi | 08:00 |
| dimak | Good morning | 08:00 |
| lihi | Hi | 08:00 |
| oanson | irenab, are you in? | 08:01 |
| oanson | leyal-, are you in? | 08:01 |
| irenab | hi | 08:01 |
| leyal- | Hi | 08:01 |
| oanson | #info snapiri dimak lihi irenab leyal- in meeting | 08:01 |
| oanson | #topic Roadmap | 08:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Roadmap (Meeting topic: Dragonflow)" | 08:01 | |
| oanson | Let's stick to the things there's progress: | 08:02 |
| oanson | DNS | 08:02 |
| oanson | the spec is up and there's some discussion there | 08:02 |
| oanson | Is there something we need to raise here? | 08:02 |
| *** yboaron has quit IRC | 08:02 | |
| oanson | #link DNS spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527956/ | 08:03 |
| lihi | I don't think there are major issues. irenab and snapiri asked I'll add the DB definition with more details | 08:04 |
| *** yujunz has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:04 | |
| oanson | Do you think it is doable by end of February? | 08:04 |
| oanson | lihi, ^^^ ? | 08:04 |
| lihi | Yes | 08:05 |
| oanson | All right. Then let's try to close the spec as soon as possible (say, this week)? | 08:05 |
| lihi | Sure | 08:06 |
| oanson | Cool! | 08:06 |
| oanson | Upgrades - there is some discussion on the spec | 08:06 |
| oanson | #link Upgrade spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500647/ | 08:06 |
| oanson | There are two options on the spec | 08:07 |
| dimak | Zuul's unhappy ;) | 08:07 |
| oanson | I sent a recheck. I don't think it's me... :D | 08:07 |
| irenab | Of the spec? | 08:07 |
| oanson | yes | 08:07 |
| oanson | So there are two options: two migration scripts, or a migration + online upgrade | 08:08 |
| oanson | Or two migration script, and then online upgrade. | 08:08 |
| oanson | I don't have a problem saying that upgrades that can't be done with migration scripts are not supported. | 08:08 |
| irenab | oanson, such as? | 08:09 |
| oanson | Since I *really* don't want online upgrades | 08:09 |
| *** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:09 | |
| dimak | Voted on spec | 08:09 |
| oanson | irenab, such as anything requiring IPAM | 08:09 |
| irenab | oanson, what is the case with IPAM? | 08:10 |
| oanson | Basically, everything we have today (including DHCP) can be done that way | 08:10 |
| oanson | irenab, none yet that I know of | 08:10 |
| lihi | Why will it require IPAM? | 08:11 |
| oanson | It won't | 08:11 |
| oanson | I think there's a mixup | 08:11 |
| *** yujunz has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:11 | |
| oanson | currently, all upgrades we need can be done with two migration scripts. We don't need e.g. IPAM or other such services. | 08:11 |
| oanson | If ever we will need IPAM during upgrade, it won't be supported by our upgrade method. | 08:11 |
| leyal- | irenab. let assume that we will have a topology change that will require a new port , we will need to assign an ip to this port | 08:11 |
| irenab | oanson, so with 2 migration, dev will provide neutron and df scripts each to be invoked during neutron/df db migration process. Correct? | 08:12 |
| snapiri | oanson: none of the terms you use here (upgrade / migration) is from Neutron DB, right? | 08:12 |
| oanson | irenab, yes | 08:13 |
| *** anilvenkata has quit IRC | 08:13 | |
| *** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:13 | |
| oanson | snapiri, 'alembic migration' is the Neutron upgrade process | 08:13 |
| oanson | s/Neutron/Neutron DB/ | 08:13 |
| irenab | leyal-, I think that use case you raised is more than just DB upgrade | 08:13 |
| irenab | I think maybe case like this should be handled as exceptions | 08:14 |
| lihi | leyal-, if the neutron server is down (option 1), can we even have topology changes? | 08:15 |
| irenab | probably involving dedicated upgrade procedure | 08:15 |
| irenab | oanson, what about changing subnet to become core df model entity? | 08:16 |
| oanson | irenab, what about it? | 08:16 |
| oanson | The upgrade code is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527717 | 08:17 |
| leyal- | lihi , yes , i talked about topology changes that caused by the upgrade , like virtual ports for apps .. | 08:17 |
| oanson | leyal-, I think this is the part that will need specialised changes anyway. | 08:17 |
| irenab | oanson, so it Noop for neutron and the script in the change for df? | 08:17 |
| oanson | I think lihi also meant that you can't do that in a Neutron-only upgrade (i.e. Neutron doesn't support that feature) | 08:18 |
| oanson | irenab, yes | 08:18 |
| oanson | The only upgrade script we have that needs Neutron DB changes is DHCP | 08:18 |
| *** pabelanger has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
| oanson | #link DHCP upgrade https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527716 | 08:19 |
| *** trozet has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
| oanson | I added the relevant comment | 08:19 |
| irenab | oanson, leyal- so looks like DHCP/Topology change can be resolved by 2 scripts | 08:20 |
| *** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:20 | |
| oanson | irenab, yes | 08:20 |
| oanson | leyal-, are you convinced? | 08:20 |
| leyal- | I think that the currently dhcp app is to only app that use neutron for creating new object.. | 08:20 |
| *** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:20 | |
| oanson | leyal-, yes. But even that is solvable with offline scripts | 08:21 |
| leyal- | oanson, i will go with majority decision :) | 08:22 |
| oanson | All right. So do we have consensus on option 1: Two offline scripts? | 08:22 |
| oanson | Speak now or forever hold your pieces | 08:22 |
| irenab | +1 | 08:22 |
| lihi | +1 | 08:22 |
| dimak | aye | 08:23 |
| snapiri | yes | 08:23 |
| oanson | Hooray! | 08:23 |
| oanson | I'll update the spec today and start cracking | 08:23 |
| oanson | Anything else for roadmap? | 08:23 |
| leyal- | yep | 08:24 |
| oanson | leyal-, shoot! | 08:24 |
| leyal- | still working on the comment's on the kuryr df drivers . hope that i will came with primitive IPAM patch - today or tommarow .. | 08:25 |
| oanson | #link Kuryr-Dragonflow patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529971/ | 08:25 |
| oanson | Cool | 08:25 |
| oanson | Anything else for roadmap? | 08:26 |
| oanson | #topic Bugs | 08:27 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: Dragonflow)" | 08:27 | |
| oanson | So | 08:27 |
| oanson | The end of the cycle is coming fast | 08:27 |
| irenab | oanson, date? | 08:27 |
| oanson | And I think now would be a good time to start tackling bugs | 08:27 |
| oanson | End of February, if I recall. | 08:27 |
| oanson | 28th of February | 08:28 |
| oanson | So that gives us almost two months to tackle bugs, and we have quite a few | 08:28 |
| snapiri | There is the biggie with the SG... | 08:28 |
| oanson | Yes. We'll get to that in a minute | 08:29 |
| oanson | Basically, so we don't step on each other's toes, if you start looking at a bug, assign it to yourself. | 08:29 |
| oanson | Don't feel bad about unassigning it later if you feel it's boring | 08:29 |
| *** kevzha01 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:30 | |
| *** kevzha01 is now known as kevinz | 08:30 | |
| oanson | We have 14 High bugs. I think we can manage it. Except the ZMQ active-port bug, which I want to demote. | 08:30 |
| oanson | (Unless there are objections?) | 08:30 |
| irenab | link? | 08:30 |
| oanson | I speak of https://bugs.launchpad.net/dragonflow/+bug/1716933 | 08:30 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1716933 in DragonFlow "ZMQ and Active Port Detection app try to bind to the same port" [High,New] | 08:30 |
| snapiri | oanson: is this the one failing the devstack? | 08:31 |
| oanson | Basically it is the entire issue we're having with the 'multiproc' direction. I think the correct solution is to move to broker-only pub/sub. | 08:31 |
| oanson | snapiri, No. We disabled these tests | 08:31 |
| snapiri | oanson: I meant is this the one I encountered when I tried to deploy devstack on my VM... | 08:32 |
| oanson | Yes | 08:32 |
| oanson | Yes it is. | 08:32 |
| snapiri | Any solution to that would be appreciated as it is super annoying | 08:33 |
| oanson | There was a lot of research done here and many ideas already thrown around. But I think it is a. not so important due to the etcd pub/sub mechanism, and b. a lot of work, so I think it can wait for R cycle | 08:33 |
| oanson | snapiri, yes: Use the etcd pub/sub and not ZMQ | 08:33 |
| oanson | Or use redis | 08:33 |
| oanson | Now for the really interesting bug: | 08:34 |
| irenab | oanson, about this baug | 08:34 |
| oanson | #link Security groups + FIP bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/dragonflow/+bug/1740739 | 08:34 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1740739 in DragonFlow "Security group mismatch for floating IP" [High,New] | 08:34 |
| oanson | irenab, yes? | 08:34 |
| irenab | Can you please update in the bug about the etc/redis alternatives and and reason why reducing the priority or making this non issue | 08:35 |
| oanson | Sure. Will do | 08:35 |
| oanson | irenab, Done | 08:36 |
| oanson | Re bug 1740739 | 08:36 |
| openstack | bug 1740739 in DragonFlow "Security group mismatch for floating IP" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1740739 | 08:36 |
| oanson | Basically, the issue is that today security groups takes the private IP of the VMs when building the OpenFlow rules. | 08:37 |
| oanson | Even for Security Group based rules (i.e. saying 'allow for ports in Security Group B') | 08:37 |
| oanson | This breaks when using FIP, since the packet arrives with the floating IP (external) and not the VM's IP | 08:38 |
| oanson | There's a proposed solution on the bug | 08:38 |
| oanson | And I'm reading the code to understand how Neutron does it. | 08:38 |
| oanson | I should be able to update the bug with that as well by EOW | 08:38 |
| oanson | Anything else for this bug? | 08:39 |
| oanson | Anything else for bugs, in general? | 08:39 |
| oanson | #topic Open Discussion | 08:40 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Dragonflow)" | 08:40 | |
| oanson | The floor is for the taking | 08:40 |
| oanson | LAst chance? | 08:41 |
| oanson | Last* | 08:41 |
| oanson | Cool. | 08:41 |
| oanson | Thanks everyone for coming. | 08:42 |
| snapiri | cheers | 08:42 |
| oanson | #endmeeting | 08:42 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 08:42 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Mon Jan 8 08:42:29 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 08:42 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/dragonflow/2018/dragonflow.2018-01-08-08.00.html | 08:42 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/dragonflow/2018/dragonflow.2018-01-08-08.00.txt | 08:42 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/dragonflow/2018/dragonflow.2018-01-08-08.00.log.html | 08:42 |
| *** gibi_away is now known as gibi | 08:44 | |
| *** yboaron has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 08:57 | |
| *** yujunz has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:03 | |
| *** sbezverk has quit IRC | 09:11 | |
| *** Dmitrii-Sh has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:11 | |
| *** arcolife has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:13 | |
| *** finucannot is now known as stephenfin | 09:16 | |
| *** TuanVu has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 09:26 | |
| *** yujunz has quit IRC | 09:30 | |
| *** junboli has quit IRC | 09:33 | |
| *** salmankhan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 10:01 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 10:02 | |
| *** kiennt26 has quit IRC | 10:07 | |
| *** tinwood_ is now known as tinwood | 10:10 | |
| *** pbourke has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
| *** pbourke has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 10:12 | |
| *** TuanVu has quit IRC | 10:26 | |
| *** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts | 10:50 | |
| *** jamespage has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
| *** wolsen has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
| *** wolsen has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 10:52 | |
| *** jamespage has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 10:52 | |
| *** numans has quit IRC | 11:06 | |
| *** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:08 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:35 | |
| *** tuanla____ has quit IRC | 11:46 | |
| *** anilvenkata has quit IRC | 11:50 | |
| *** seajay has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:53 | |
| *** seajay has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
| *** seajay has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 11:56 | |
| *** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:00 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:09 | |
| *** liuyulong has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
| *** julim_ has quit IRC | 12:37 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:38 | |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 12:42 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 12:47 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 12:49 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
| *** hieulq has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
| *** hieulq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:05 | |
| *** iurygregory has quit IRC | 13:20 | |
| *** janonymous has quit IRC | 13:22 | |
| *** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:24 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 13:25 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:25 | |
| *** cleong has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:28 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:28 | |
| *** coolsvap has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:36 | |
| *** juriarte1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:52 | |
| *** kiennt26 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:53 | |
| *** salmankhan1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:55 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 13:57 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
| *** salmankhan1 is now known as salmankhan | 13:59 | |
| irenab | startmeeting #kuryr | 14:00 |
| irenab | #startmeeting kuryr | 14:01 |
| openstack | Meeting started Mon Jan 8 14:01:25 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is irenab. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: kuryr)" | 14:01 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'kuryr' | 14:01 |
| *** bhagyashris has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:01 | |
| irenab | hi, who is here for kuryr weekly? | 14:01 |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 14:01 | |
| yboaron | +1 | 14:02 |
| *** bhagyashris has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:02 | |
| ltomasbo | hi! | 14:02 |
| dulek | o/ | 14:02 |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
| irenab | #chair ltomasbo | 14:03 |
| openstack | Current chairs: irenab ltomasbo | 14:03 |
| irenab | ltomasbo, added you since I will have to leave in about 20 mins | 14:03 |
| irenab | lets start with kuryr-kubernetes? | 14:03 |
| *** apuimedo has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:03 | |
| apuimedo | yes | 14:03 |
| irenab | #chair apuimedo | 14:03 |
| openstack | Current chairs: apuimedo irenab ltomasbo | 14:03 |
| ltomasbo | ok | 14:03 |
| irenab | #topic kuryr-kubernetes | 14:04 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "kuryr-kubernetes (Meeting topic: kuryr)" | 14:04 | |
| apuimedo | #info an important fix for kubelet retries has been merged 210603 | 14:04 |
| apuimedo | damn, wrong number | 14:04 |
| apuimedo | #link https://review.openstack.org/518404 | 14:04 |
| apuimedo | #info The new readiness check server has been marked for merging too | 14:05 |
| irenab | apuimedo, question on that one | 14:05 |
| dulek | I'm not sure if 518404 it's so important, but it helps a bit with failures. :) | 14:05 |
| *** maysamacedos has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:06 | |
| irenab | Regarding readiness check, I suggest to make the probe loadable via stevedore to keep the kuryr infra as generic as it used to be | 14:06 |
| apuimedo | dulek: it helps prevent an very frustrating issue | 14:06 |
| irenab | Can be done as a follow up, just wanted to check if agreed | 14:06 |
| apuimedo | makes it important for ux | 14:07 |
| irenab | dulek, link? | 14:07 |
| apuimedo | irenab: you meant the stevedorization? | 14:07 |
| irenab | apuimedo, yes :-) | 14:07 |
| dulek | irenab: I've meant https://review.openstack.org/518404 - the retries fix. | 14:07 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos is here too now | 14:07 |
| irenab | dulek, important fix | 14:07 |
| apuimedo | irenab: well, I do think that kuryr-kubernetes should be able to have methods that are used for readiness and health checks | 14:08 |
| apuimedo | so that when they are instantiated they get registered with the readiness/health check servers | 14:08 |
| irenab | I kind like the way we had kuryr as generic integration framework, so it could be used to have non neutron drivers | 14:09 |
| apuimedo | irenab: dulek: granted it only affected baremetal | 14:09 |
| irenab | apuimedo, no argument on your point | 14:09 |
| apuimedo | so that makes it slightly less damning | 14:09 |
| irenab | I just think that it should not be explicetly hard coded in the kuryr server code, but loadable based on deployment option | 14:09 |
| apuimedo | irenab: currently maysamacedos and I were about to discuss about the approach for the liveness checks | 14:09 |
| apuimedo | I suggested having the liveness check server hold references to the handler threads for checks | 14:10 |
| apuimedo | but it would probably be better that the references are used to ask the handler instances themselves | 14:10 |
| irenab | apuimedo, not sure I follow | 14:11 |
| apuimedo | since it could happen that the thread is alive | 14:11 |
| apuimedo | but the handler is in a bad state | 14:11 |
| apuimedo | irenab: we want to add liveness checks that monitor the health of the vif/service/etc handlers as well | 14:11 |
| dulek | apuimedo: You mean the watcher threads? | 14:12 |
| apuimedo | dulek: yes, the different threads on which the handlers run | 14:12 |
| irenab | apuimedo, important to have that too. My point is that we need to have this not explicit, but based on the drivers used in the deployment to keep the current pluggability | 14:12 |
| dulek | apuimedo: I'm not sure if it's worth it, I think Watcher threads has protection from unexpected exceptions. | 14:13 |
| apuimedo | what I'm saying is that probably we should have protocols for instances to register to the readiness/liveness check servers | 14:13 |
| apuimedo | that can be implemented by any instance | 14:13 |
| *** lyan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:13 | |
| dulek | apuimedo: Ah, that might be better. | 14:13 |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:13 | |
| apuimedo | irenab: yes, but maybe we don't need stevedore for that | 14:13 |
| apuimedo | stevedore handles loading of the instances | 14:13 |
| apuimedo | that part we already have | 14:13 |
| apuimedo | I'm just saying that as part of the loading | 14:13 |
| irenab | apuimedo, not for the readiness probe | 14:13 |
| apuimedo | that currently exists | 14:13 |
| apuimedo | they could register with readiness/liveness depending on which of those two protocols they implement | 14:14 |
| apuimedo | dulek: irenab: maysamacedos: how does that sound? | 14:14 |
| irenab | line 53 is bothering me https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529335/17/kuryr_kubernetes/controller/service.py | 14:14 |
| apuimedo | irenab: why? | 14:15 |
| apuimedo | I think we always want a readiness check server | 14:15 |
| apuimedo | what should be different | 14:15 |
| irenab | explicit call to the brobe that checks for neutron and keystone. What if kuryr is used for non neutron drivers? | 14:15 |
| apuimedo | is that only checks for components that have been plugged should be performed in it | 14:15 |
| apuimedo | irenab: that's what I'm saying | 14:16 |
| apuimedo | :-) | 14:16 |
| apuimedo | you want the readiness checker running | 14:16 |
| irenab | We started to play with adding DF native drivers to kuryr | 14:16 |
| apuimedo | the currently not ideal thing | 14:16 |
| irenab | so we will check for DF readiness and not neutron | 14:16 |
| apuimedo | is that now it is a module that just performs always the same checks | 14:16 |
| apuimedo | what I want is that the neutron vif handler | 14:16 |
| maysamacedos | apuimedo: not sure I get it what you meant with "protocols for instances to register to the readiness/liveness" | 14:16 |
| apuimedo | registers its checking method | 14:16 |
| apuimedo | which checks neutron | 14:17 |
| apuimedo | the neutron service handler | 14:17 |
| irenab | apuimedo, sounds reasonable if I got it correctly | 14:17 |
| apuimedo | will check lbaasv2 or octavia | 14:17 |
| dulek | I'm +1 on that. | 14:17 |
| apuimedo | but we do want a single health checker server in the controller | 14:17 |
| irenab | apuimedo, agreed, but this will invoke routines of enabled Handlers/drivers | 14:18 |
| apuimedo | not necessarily | 14:18 |
| apuimedo | they may be external to the instances in some cases | 14:18 |
| irenab | so how this will be extendable? | 14:18 |
| apuimedo | the instance sets what it needs | 14:19 |
| irenab | apuimedo, instance of what? | 14:19 |
| dulek | Handler? | 14:19 |
| apuimedo | handlers and drivers | 14:19 |
| dulek | More like driver. :) | 14:19 |
| apuimedo | I think both could need specific checks | 14:19 |
| apuimedo | handlers need checks for liveness mostly | 14:19 |
| apuimedo | in our neutron case | 14:20 |
| apuimedo | they may need more for DF if they want to check redis for example, I don't know | 14:20 |
| irenab | We can have sort of dedicated hierarchy for the probes | 14:20 |
| apuimedo | irenab: what I want to avoid for sure is to have repeated probes | 14:21 |
| irenab | probe routines | 14:21 |
| apuimedo | so if two drivers need the same Neutron support (not different exts), I only want one check | 14:21 |
| irenab | to be performed by single health server | 14:21 |
| apuimedo | exactly | 14:21 |
| apuimedo | but that is a bit of fine tuning | 14:22 |
| irenab | routines can be added and for deployment just 'checked' to be invoked | 14:22 |
| apuimedo | and if in the beginning there is multiple neutron extension checks, clocking that at 22ms per check is not too terrible | 14:22 |
| irenab | so checking same one several times will end up calling this routine once | 14:23 |
| apuimedo | irenab: that will be the ideal | 14:23 |
| apuimedo | but we don't need to get there in a single patch | 14:23 |
| irenab | as long as we agree on the longer term generic approach, I am fine with merging the current patch | 14:24 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: what do you think of this approach? | 14:24 |
| apuimedo | taking the checks to their respective handler/drivers? | 14:24 |
| irenab | apuimedo, may I interrupt with short update on net policies on behalf of leyal- ? I have to leave in a few mins? | 14:25 |
| apuimedo | irenab: irenab | 14:26 |
| apuimedo | sure! | 14:26 |
| maysamacedos | apuimedo: Isn't that kind what I suggested in the email? | 14:26 |
| irenab | The spec is up for review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519239/ | 14:26 |
| irenab | There are 2 patches WIP mainly for missing unit tests | 14:26 |
| irenab | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530655/ | 14:27 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: in the email about the references to the task? | 14:27 |
| irenab | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526916/ | 14:27 |
| maysamacedos | apuimedo: eys | 14:27 |
| maysamacedos | yes | 14:27 |
| *** makowals has quit IRC | 14:27 | |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: what we're saying is to move the check code out of the server | 14:27 |
| irenab | Please review and comment, the most important is the spec patch to agree on direction of the implementation | 14:27 |
| apuimedo | so each module/class can contribute its own readiness and liveness code | 14:28 |
| apuimedo | and the readiness/health check servers just load id | 14:28 |
| maysamacedos | hmm I see | 14:28 |
| irenab | apuimedo, all, please review the Net policies spec | 14:28 |
| apuimedo | (not the k8s readiness check) | 14:28 |
| apuimedo | irenab: will do | 14:28 |
| irenab | thanks! /me sorry, have to leave | 14:28 |
| apuimedo | irenab: have you tried straight to DF policy translation? | 14:28 |
| *** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:29 | |
| irenab | apuimedo, no, not yet | 14:29 |
| irenab | first with translation to neutron SGs | 14:29 |
| apuimedo | irenab: and for port operations, how much faster is it, bypassing neutron | 14:29 |
| apuimedo | ? | 14:30 |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: are you here? | 14:30 |
| ltomasbo | I am | 14:30 |
| irenab | apuimedo, have to measure, the patch is here but it is very WIP: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529971/ | 14:30 |
| apuimedo | how's the node depending vif driver? | 14:30 |
| apuimedo | irenab: cool! | 14:31 |
| apuimedo | ttyl then! | 14:31 |
| ltomasbo | apuimedo, you mean this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528345? | 14:31 |
| dulek | apuimedo: You mean stuff I'm working on? | 14:31 |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:31 | |
| ltomasbo | the multi-pool multi-vif thing? | 14:32 |
| maysamacedos | apuimedo: what you meant with the checks servers load the id? | 14:33 |
| dulek | apuimedo's just sitting there wondering what we'll figure out from his cryptic message. :D | 14:36 |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: right | 14:36 |
| apuimedo | that | 14:37 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: id? | 14:37 |
| ltomasbo | so, I tested it and it was working (before Christmas) | 14:37 |
| apuimedo | dulek: apuimedo was taking the baby outside of the room :P | 14:37 |
| ltomasbo | but I would like to check it at a real mix environment | 14:37 |
| apuimedo | sorry | 14:37 |
| apuimedo | :-) | 14:37 |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: ok | 14:37 |
| ltomasbo | as I just checked from one or the other environment, with the multi driver | 14:37 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: not sure about "the id" part | 14:38 |
| apuimedo | a typo maybe | 14:38 |
| ltomasbo | detecting the pool driver to use from the node vif label | 14:38 |
| maysamacedos | apuimedo: thats what you said "the readiness/health check servers just load id " | 14:38 |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: with multi node devstack it should be doable | 14:38 |
| ltomasbo | I'm deploying the devstack with kubelet in one port to test | 14:38 |
| maysamacedos | probably a typo | 14:38 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: typo then | 14:38 |
| apuimedo | mean "just load it" | 14:38 |
| ltomasbo | apuimedo, yes, but our current local.conf are kind of broken | 14:38 |
| *** makowals has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: that's interesting | 14:39 |
| ltomasbo | I got a problem with the etcd running on a nested configuration | 14:39 |
| apuimedo | how? | 14:39 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: so I meant that when we load the drivers/handlers, they can contain methods for the health check servers | 14:39 |
| ltomasbo | becasue devstack now forces etcd to be installed on the server_host, instead of on the local one | 14:39 |
| apuimedo | and for the readiness one too | 14:39 |
| ltomasbo | and I needed local to be nested | 14:39 |
| *** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:39 | |
| apuimedo | why? | 14:40 |
| ltomasbo | and I just created the port on the pods network and deploying on baremetal on the remove server | 14:40 |
| ltomasbo | apuimedo: https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/commit/146332e349416ac0b3c9653b0ae68d55dbb3f9de | 14:40 |
| *** apuimedo has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| *** apuimedo has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:42 | |
| ltomasbo | apuimedo: https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/commit/146332e349416ac0b3c9653b0ae68d55dbb3f9de | 14:42 |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:42 | |
| ltomasbo | and it also fails on the remove baremetal devstack node, I'm going to check what the problem is there | 14:42 |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: crap | 14:43 |
| ltomasbo | umm 2018-01-08 14:41:43.053 | ++ /opt/stack/kuryr-kubernetes/devstack/plugin.sh:extract_hyperkube:497 : docker cp :/hyperkube /tmp/hyperkube | 14:43 |
| ltomasbo | 2018-01-08 14:41:43.069 | must specify at least one container source | 14:43 |
| apuimedo | ok, that's a bug | 14:43 |
| apuimedo | :-) | 14:43 |
| apuimedo | we should have our local.conf put :: then | 14:43 |
| apuimedo | or just '0' | 14:43 |
| maysamacedos | apuimedo: got it | 14:44 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: ;-) | 14:44 |
| ltomasbo | apuimedo, but still the neutron services are on the Service_host | 14:44 |
| ltomasbo | so, we also need that | 14:44 |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 14:45 | |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: I'm not sure I follow | 14:46 |
| apuimedo | devstack with everything (including etcd) and another with just the kubelet running on a nova VM | 14:46 |
| ltomasbo | apuimedo, are you suggesting our local.conf just set server_host to ::: | 14:46 |
| apuimedo | one uses veth, the other pod in VM | 14:47 |
| ltomasbo | ahh, ok, now I got what you meant | 14:47 |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: on the devstack with everything the server host would be 0.0.0.0:2379 | 14:47 |
| ltomasbo | the other way around I was doing... | 14:47 |
| apuimedo | for etcd | 14:47 |
| maysamacedos | apuimedo: but what this methods would check then? since they are in each module they could not verify the thread state neither if an exception occured.. or they could? | 14:47 |
| apuimedo | maysamacedos: would not be called on the instance | 14:48 |
| apuimedo | what you wrote on the email | 14:48 |
| apuimedo | but outside of the liveness monitor | 14:48 |
| apuimedo | probably on the watcher instance | 14:49 |
| apuimedo | ltomasbo: anything else? | 14:49 |
| apuimedo | or did I miss something? | 14:49 |
| ltomasbo | apuimedo, that's it from my side | 14:49 |
| apuimedo | good! | 14:50 |
| dulek | Okay, so maybe a quick update from me? | 14:50 |
| apuimedo | dulek: please! | 14:50 |
| dulek | Simple one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531128/ | 14:50 |
| dulek | I've tried K8s 1.9 on the gate, everything looks fine. | 14:50 |
| dulek | I don't know what policy we have on updating it. And I don't have a strong opinion on that. | 14:50 |
| apuimedo | the policy is, if it ain't failing, upgrade | 14:51 |
| dulek | But in any case once we decide to move forward we should be fine with that. | 14:51 |
| apuimedo | so that we know that the queens release works well with 1.9 | 14:52 |
| dulek | I wonder if we want to gate on older versions as well? | 14:52 |
| dulek | Do we have support matrix or sth like that? | 14:52 |
| dulek | I guess it's something we need to discuss with irenab as well. | 14:54 |
| apuimedo | dulek: indeed | 14:54 |
| apuimedo | let's discuss it tomorrow morning when irenab and dmellado will also be able to weigh in | 14:54 |
| dulek | Second thing is I've updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527243 with apuimedo's remarks. | 14:54 |
| dulek | Now pooled VIFs are attached to a dummy namespace when discovered and on CNI ADD they're only replugged (at least I think they are). | 14:55 |
| apuimedo | dulek: for baremetal or for all? | 14:55 |
| dulek | apuimedo: Good question, only bare metal for now, I've left nested in TODO for now. | 14:55 |
| apuimedo | good! | 14:56 |
| dulek | I'm trying to time BM case now to see if there's a benefit from that in a single-node case. | 14:56 |
| apuimedo | :-) | 14:56 |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 14:56 | |
| apuimedo | dulek: with port pooling I would seriously hope there's a big improvement | 14:56 |
| dulek | First results show a tiny performance improvement, but I'm trying now with higher number of ports. | 14:56 |
| apuimedo | since there's only a veth change of NS | 14:56 |
| apuimedo | instead of activation + netlink creation + move | 14:57 |
| apuimedo | dulek: first create 50 ports | 14:57 |
| apuimedo | wait until the dummy namespace is full | 14:57 |
| apuimedo | then create the pods | 14:57 |
| dulek | apuimedo: That's how I'm trying to test it. | 14:57 |
| apuimedo | that's the scenario | 14:57 |
| apuimedo | ok | 14:57 |
| dulek | apuimedo: Please take a look at binding code then. I may do too much stuff on the reattachment side. | 14:57 |
| apuimedo | dulek: will do! | 14:57 |
| dulek | apuimedo: An advice there would help. :) | 14:58 |
| apuimedo | anything else anybody? | 14:58 |
| dulek | Okay, that's it! | 14:58 |
| yboaron | I Can update from my side | 14:58 |
| apuimedo | yboaron: please do! | 14:58 |
| yboaron | Please ,Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529966/ | 14:58 |
| apuimedo | oh fuck | 14:58 |
| yboaron | The devref to support Ingress controller , the OCP-route support will be based on this common part | 14:58 |
| yboaron | (L7 routers) | 14:58 |
| yboaron | apuimedo, fuck the ingres-controller ??? | 14:58 |
| apuimedo | I wanted to spend some time discussing your proposal for separate router/ingress controller component | 14:58 |
| apuimedo | but irenab and dmellado left already | 14:59 |
| *** arcolife has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
| apuimedo | let's discuss that tomorrow morning, please | 14:59 |
| yboaron | I almost finished splitting the patch into 3 pieces , but there's an open issue if we need to have a seperate controller for that purpose, | 14:59 |
| yboaron | something similiar to NGINX/GCE ingress controller, | 14:59 |
| yboaron | or just extend kuryr-controller to support ingress and OCP-Route | 14:59 |
| apuimedo | yboaron: I'll review the patch ;-) | 14:59 |
| yboaron | apuimedo, so maybe we can do it tomorrow on kuryr channel | 14:59 |
| apuimedo | dulek: take a look at it too | 14:59 |
| apuimedo | yboaron: we'll have to | 14:59 |
| apuimedo | :-) | 14:59 |
| apuimedo | there's not enough people now to discuss | 15:00 |
| apuimedo | and the time just ran out | 15:00 |
| apuimedo | THanks all for joining | 15:00 |
| apuimedo | ! | 15:00 |
| apuimedo | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 15:00 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Mon Jan 8 15:00:20 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kuryr/2018/kuryr.2018-01-08-14.01.html | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kuryr/2018/kuryr.2018-01-08-14.01.txt | 15:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kuryr/2018/kuryr.2018-01-08-14.01.log.html | 15:00 |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:01 | |
| *** Guest8485 is now known as dansmith | 15:02 | |
| *** dansmith is now known as Guest62501 | 15:02 | |
| *** sdague has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| *** Guest62501 is now known as dansmith | 15:05 | |
| *** maysamacedos has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
| *** maysamacedos has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:08 | |
| *** sbezverk has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:09 | |
| *** juriarte1 has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:10 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
| *** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:10 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:10 | |
| *** makowals has quit IRC | 15:22 | |
| *** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:23 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:26 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:27 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| *** makowals has quit IRC | 15:40 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:42 | |
| *** maysamacedos has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:44 | |
| *** ram5391 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:52 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:53 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
| *** kiennt26 has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 15:55 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 15:59 | |
| *** SerenaFeng has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| *** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:05 | |
| *** yboaron_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:05 | |
| *** yboaron has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| *** anilvenkata has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
| *** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:21 | |
| *** yboaron_ has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| *** krtaylor has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** krtaylor_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:27 | |
| *** yfauser has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:30 | |
| *** yfauser has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
| *** d0ugal has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
| *** maysamacedos has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:44 | |
| *** maysamacedos has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** arcolife has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:47 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:48 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
| *** yamahata has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
| *** ram5391 has quit IRC | 16:52 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 16:52 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:53 | |
| *** ram5391 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:56 | |
| *** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 16:59 | |
| coreycb | #startmeeting charms | 17:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Mon Jan 8 17:00:13 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is coreycb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 17:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 17:00 |
| coreycb | o/ hi all | 17:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: charms)" | 17:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'charms' | 17:00 |
| thedac | o/ | 17:00 |
| tinwood | o/ corey | 17:00 |
| coreycb | #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting | 17:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Review ACTION points from previous meeting (Meeting topic: charms)" | 17:00 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:00 | |
| coreycb | we have 2 action items in the minutes from our last meeting | 17:01 |
| coreycb | 1) all - fix critical and high priority bugs | 17:01 |
| *** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:01 | |
| coreycb | 2) jamespage - update the release policy again - ongoing. | 17:01 |
| coreycb | i'll keep those there unless there are any objects or updates | 17:02 |
| thedac | Criticals are all fix committed. There are 56 open high bugs | 17:02 |
| thedac | +1 to keeping | 17:02 |
| coreycb | \o/ | 17:02 |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
| coreycb | #action - fix critical and high priority bugs - 56 open high - currently all critical are fix committed! | 17:03 |
| coreycb | #action all fix critical and high priority bugs - 56 open high - currently all critical are fix committed! | 17:03 |
| *** arcolife has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| coreycb | #action jamespage update the release policy again - ongoing | 17:03 |
| coreycb | #topic State of Development for next Charm Release | 17:04 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "State of Development for next Charm Release (Meeting topic: charms)" | 17:04 | |
| coreycb | what's new with dev? | 17:04 |
| thedac | In the middle of the 18.02 cycle. | 17:05 |
| tinwood | Still doing py3 charm conversions | 17:05 |
| thedac | Curently gnouy is writing the spec for cells v2 | 17:05 |
| thedac | Designate - neutron integration is committed. Still needs a blog post from me to explain how to use it. | 17:05 |
| thedac | coreycb: that can be an action item ^^ | 17:06 |
| tinwood | \o/ | 17:06 |
| coreycb | #action thedac designate neutron integration blog post on how to use | 17:06 |
| coreycb | thanks. and i know james had some queens updates to the charms for milestone 2 that i think have landed. | 17:06 |
| *** maysamacedos has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:07 | |
| coreycb | #topic High Priority Bugs | 17:07 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "High Priority Bugs (Meeting topic: charms)" | 17:07 | |
| coreycb | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-charms/+bugs | 17:07 |
| coreycb | critical: 0, high: 56, new: 16 | 17:08 |
| coreycb | well, still a lot of highs to dig into. would be nice to get those numbers down. | 17:09 |
| tinwood | indeed. | 17:09 |
| thedac | +1 | 17:09 |
| coreycb | #link http://tinyurl.com/charm-stable-backports | 17:09 |
| *** maysamacedos has left #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:10 | |
| coreycb | #link https://tinyurl.com/osc-critical-bugs | 17:10 |
| coreycb | #link https://tinyurl.com/osc-high-priority | 17:10 |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| coreycb | quick links there for bugs ^^ | 17:11 |
| coreycb | #topic Openstack Events | 17:11 |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Events (Meeting topic: charms)" | 17:11 | |
| thedac | PTG in February https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ | 17:11 |
| coreycb | thedac: great, thanks | 17:11 |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** d0ugal has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:12 | |
| coreycb | and end of May for openstack summit in vancouver | 17:12 |
| tinwood | Vancouver's nice. | 17:12 |
| coreycb | sure is, and so is Spring! | 17:13 |
| tinwood | :) | 17:13 |
| coreycb | #topic Open Discussion | 17:13 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: charms)" | 17:13 | |
| coreycb | anything to bring up here? | 17:13 |
| thedac | I am good | 17:13 |
| coreycb | thedac: is osci off for the spectre/meltdown issues? | 17:14 |
| thedac | Yes it is. Once we have kernel and qemu updates we will restore functionality | 17:14 |
| coreycb | thedac: ok great | 17:14 |
| coreycb | alright if there's nothing else then let's get back at it | 17:15 |
| tinwood | not from me | 17:16 |
| coreycb | #topic Next Chair | 17:16 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Next Chair (Meeting topic: charms)" | 17:16 | |
| coreycb | jamespage | 17:16 |
| coreycb | bye all, thanks for attending | 17:16 |
| coreycb | #endmeeting | 17:16 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 17:16 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Mon Jan 8 17:16:49 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:16 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/charms/2018/charms.2018-01-08-17.00.html | 17:16 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/charms/2018/charms.2018-01-08-17.00.txt | 17:16 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/charms/2018/charms.2018-01-08-17.00.log.html | 17:16 |
| thedac | Thanks, coreycb | 17:16 |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:17 | |
| tinwood | thanks coreycb | 17:17 |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:19 | |
| *** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:20 | |
| *** ram5391 has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:34 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:43 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
| *** ram5391 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 17:51 | |
| *** ram5391 has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
| *** gnuoy has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:00 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:05 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 18:16 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 18:17 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:21 | |
| *** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:21 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:34 | |
| *** beekneemech is now known as bnemec | 18:34 | |
| *** corey_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:39 | |
| *** cleong has quit IRC | 18:40 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:44 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 18:59 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:01 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:02 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 19:06 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:09 | |
| *** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:19 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:21 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:28 | |
| *** salmankhan has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:37 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 19:43 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
| *** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:00 | |
| *** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:01 | |
| *** VW__ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:03 | |
| *** VW_ has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:04 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| *** snapiri1 has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:07 | |
| *** snapiri1 has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
| *** openstack has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:39 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack | 20:39 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:56 | |
| *** woodard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 20:57 | |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
| *** VW__ has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 21:02 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 21:06 | |
| *** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 21:11 | |
| *** corey_ has quit IRC | 21:25 | |
| *** woodard_ has quit IRC | 21:25 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 21:26 | |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 21:28 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 21:39 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** MeganR has quit IRC | 21:49 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 21:59 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:14 | |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 22:24 | |
| *** emagana has quit IRC | 22:30 | |
| *** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:31 | |
| *** emagana has quit IRC | 22:32 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:38 | |
| *** emagana has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
| *** lyan has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 22:45 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:46 | |
| *** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:47 | |
| *** emagana has quit IRC | 22:51 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 22:53 | |
| *** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:54 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:55 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 22:58 | |
| *** VW_ has quit IRC | 22:58 | |
| *** VW has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
| *** chyka_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:06 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
| *** chyka has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:13 | |
| *** chyka_ has quit IRC | 23:13 | |
| *** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:14 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:14 | |
| *** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk | 23:22 | |
| *** chyka_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:32 | |
| *** chyka has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
| *** chyka_ has quit IRC | 23:48 | |
| *** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:49 | |
| *** chyka_ has joined #openstack-meeting-4 | 23:55 | |
| *** chyka has quit IRC | 23:55 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!