*** artom has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
*** hemanth_n has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 00:41 | |
*** hemanth_n has quit IRC | 00:50 | |
*** pongboom2 has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 01:10 | |
*** pongboom has quit IRC | 01:13 | |
*** hemanth_n has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:09 | |
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:10 | |
*** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:21 | |
*** bnemec has quit IRC | 05:27 | |
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:29 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:02 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:39 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:02 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:22 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:45 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:55 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:03 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:56 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:27 | |
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:57 | |
*** njohnston has quit IRC | 12:06 | |
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:11 | |
*** psahoo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:28 | |
*** psahoo has quit IRC | 12:32 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** njohnston has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:42 | |
*** njohnston has quit IRC | 12:45 | |
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:46 | |
*** njohnston has quit IRC | 12:54 | |
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:55 | |
*** hemanth_n has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:41 | |
*** stephenfin has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:57 | |
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:58 | |
*** Luzi has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
slaweq | #startmeeting networking | 14:01 |
---|---|---|
openstack | Meeting started Tue May 11 14:01:16 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:01 | |
slaweq | hi | 14:01 |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'networking' | 14:01 |
mlavalle | o/ | 14:01 |
obondarev | hi | 14:01 |
njohnston | o/ | 14:01 |
rubasov | hi | 14:01 |
ralonsoh | hi | 14:01 |
slaweq | welcome everyone | 14:02 |
slaweq | let's start with first topic | 14:02 |
slaweq | #topic announcements | 14:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:02 | |
slaweq | According to Xena calendar, first milestone is May 24th | 14:02 |
slaweq | so in about 2 weeks from now | 14:02 |
slaweq | next one | 14:03 |
slaweq | We have bunch of security bugs opened http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022353.html | 14:03 |
slaweq | I will need some help with triaging those LPs | 14:03 |
mlavalle | I'll help | 14:04 |
slaweq | thx | 14:05 |
slaweq | and that's all announcements from me for today | 14:05 |
mlavalle | any pressing deadline? | 14:05 |
mlavalle | for the triaging I mean | 14:05 |
slaweq | mlavalle: no, but as those are security issues, we should probably do it in some reasonable time | 14:05 |
amotoki | they are public security so there is no specific deadline but it would be nice if we can triage them. | 14:06 |
amotoki | I will look into them too. | 14:06 |
slaweq | thx amotoki | 14:06 |
mlavalle | ok, I'll try to go over as many as possible by early next week | 14:06 |
slaweq | thx both of You | 14:06 |
slaweq | anything else You want to share with the team today? | 14:06 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:07 | |
slaweq | if not, let's move on to the next topic | 14:07 |
slaweq | #topic Blueprints | 14:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprints (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:07 | |
slaweq | BPs for Xena-1 are on the list https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/xena-1 | 14:08 |
slaweq | do You have any updates about them? | 14:08 |
slaweq | ok, from my side I just want to ask for review patches related to secure-rbac https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522secure-rbac%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/neutron | 14:09 |
slaweq | there are still some of them which needs to be checked | 14:09 |
slaweq | but fortunatelly not a lot :) | 14:10 |
slaweq | please also check list of opened specs and review some https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/neutron-specs+status:open | 14:11 |
slaweq | I will try to review them too | 14:11 |
slaweq | especially those proposed by gibi, lajoskatona and rubasov :) | 14:11 |
gibi | slaweq: thanks :) | 14:12 |
rubasov | thank you | 14:12 |
slaweq | yw :) | 14:12 |
mlavalle | any of those specs we should prioritize? | 14:12 |
mlavalle | there are a few | 14:13 |
slaweq | IIUC what was said during the ptg, all of them are equally important | 14:13 |
slaweq | is that correct gibi, rubasov? | 14:13 |
rubasov | good question | 14:14 |
rubasov | right now I don't have an order in my mind | 14:14 |
gibi | rubasov: do we have some dependency order between the l3 spces? | 14:14 |
gibi | specs | 14:14 |
rubasov | but I'll come back if I realize some order | 14:14 |
gibi | at leat the pps spec is indepented from the rest | 14:14 |
mlavalle | the reason I ask is that in the list I got things like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/601320 | 14:15 |
slaweq | mlavalle: no, I listed all opened specs | 14:15 |
mlavalle | which I don't remeber we discussed in the PTG | 14:15 |
slaweq | so let's do it that way | 14:15 |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:15 | |
rubasov | that one is not from us | 14:16 |
slaweq | I will tonight go over all opened specs and will set review-priority to +1 for those which are important for Xena cycle | 14:16 |
mlavalle | rubasov, gibi: don't worry to much on prioritize your specs | 14:16 |
slaweq | mlavalle: will that be ok? | 14:16 |
gibi | mlavalle: ack | 14:16 |
mlavalle | rubasov, gibi: I'll look at your specs that we recently discussed | 14:16 |
gibi | thank you | 14:16 |
rubasov | thank you | 14:17 |
mlavalle | slaweq: it would be helpful, bit please don't sweat it too much. I just was surprsied at some of the things that came out in the list | 14:17 |
slaweq | sure | 14:17 |
mlavalle | I have enough with this clarification | 14:17 |
slaweq | k | 14:18 |
slaweq | thx for asking | 14:18 |
*** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:18 | |
lajoskatona | Hi, sorry for beeing late | 14:19 |
slaweq | if there are no other updates about BPs, I think we can move on | 14:19 |
slaweq | #topic Bugs | 14:19 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:19 | |
slaweq | lucasgomez was bug deputy two weeks ago, report: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022168.html | 14:19 |
slaweq | jlibosva was bug deputy last week but I don't see report from him | 14:20 |
slaweq | from the bugs which lucasgomes listed, there is couple which don't have any assignment: | 14:22 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1926109 - CI issue | 14:22 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1926109 in neutron "SSH timeout (wait timeout) due to potential paramiko issue" [Critical,New] | 14:22 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1926780 - CI issue | 14:22 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1926780 in neutron "Multicast traffic scenario test is failing sometimes on OVN job" [High,Confirmed] | 14:22 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1926531 - DVR issue | 14:22 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1926531 in neutron "SNAT namespace prematurely created then deleted on hosts, resulting in removal of RFP/FPR link to FIP namespace" [Undecided,New] | 14:22 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1926838 - OVN bug | 14:22 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1926838 in neutron "[OVN] infinite loop in ovsdb_monitor" [High,New] | 14:22 |
slaweq | so if anyone would have some time, would be great if You can take a look into them :) | 14:23 |
ralonsoh | sure | 14:24 |
slaweq | any other bugs You want to discuss today? | 14:24 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
slaweq | ok, if not, let's move on | 14:26 |
slaweq | #topic On Demand Agenda | 14:26 |
*** openstack changes topic to "On Demand Agenda (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:26 | |
slaweq | ralonsoh: You have one topic here | 14:26 |
ralonsoh | thanks | 14:26 |
ralonsoh | let me find the LP | 14:26 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1926787 | 14:26 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1926787 in neutron "[DB] Neutron quota request implementation can end in a lock status" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez) | 14:26 |
slaweq | that one? | 14:26 |
slaweq | :) | 14:26 |
ralonsoh | right! | 14:26 |
ralonsoh | and the POC: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/790060 | 14:27 |
ralonsoh | in a nutshell: the current quota driver uses a global lock for each (resource, project_id) | 14:27 |
ralonsoh | as commented in the LP bug, that could lead to a lock state in the DB if number of queries > number of replies | 14:27 |
ralonsoh | what I'm proposing is an alternative driver 100% compatible with the current quota system | 14:28 |
ralonsoh | the main part is | 14:28 |
ralonsoh | --> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/790060/6/neutron/db/quota/driver_nolock.py | 14:28 |
ralonsoh | how the reservations are made and how the resource quota is calculated | 14:29 |
ralonsoh | instead of using a used_quota table, count the resources directly on the DB, along with the reserved ones and make, if quota is available, a new reservation | 14:29 |
ralonsoh | that's all, thanks! | 14:29 |
obondarev | ralonsoh, does lock state affect all DB engines or just specific ones? | 14:30 |
ralonsoh | that depends on the engine used | 14:30 |
ralonsoh | but by default, if you use innodb tables, you'll have this lock | 14:30 |
obondarev | got it | 14:31 |
obondarev | thanks | 14:31 |
ralonsoh | what I'm trying to do is to use the DB transactionality, instead of creating a global lock (in the BD) | 14:31 |
obondarev | so this new approach gives a performance improvement as well, right ralonsoh? | 14:31 |
ralonsoh | for sure! | 14:31 |
obondarev | nice! | 14:31 |
mlavalle | +1 | 14:31 |
ralonsoh | thanks a lot, I'll push a new patch and a periodic CI job to using this driver | 14:32 |
slaweq | one question - what is the purpose of keeping both drivers in tree? | 14:32 |
ralonsoh | s/to using/to use | 14:32 |
ralonsoh | well, I think first we need to test it | 14:33 |
slaweq | do we want to deprecate old one at some point? | 14:33 |
ralonsoh | I think so | 14:33 |
slaweq | or keep both forever as they are maybe better/worst to some use cases? | 14:33 |
lajoskatona | If we need to keep both for some reason a configg option could be added | 14:33 |
ralonsoh | we already have it | 14:33 |
slaweq | lajoskatona: there is already config option to specify quota driver which should be used | 14:34 |
lajoskatona | ok, that's done:-) | 14:34 |
ralonsoh | but I don't see any use case where the old one is better | 14:34 |
ralonsoh | what I can do, if you want | 14:34 |
ralonsoh | is to change the default one | 14:34 |
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:34 | |
slaweq | maybe we should simply replace old one with that new one? | 14:34 |
ralonsoh | that will test it in any CI job | 14:34 |
slaweq | of course it will be tested in all our ci jobs :) | 14:35 |
ralonsoh | as you wish | 14:35 |
ralonsoh | do you want me to replace it? | 14:35 |
slaweq | I'm just asking :) | 14:35 |
ralonsoh | I think we can keep both for now | 14:35 |
amotoki | the config quota driver can be deprecated but our UT depends on it. | 14:35 |
ralonsoh | and next release, when tested, remove the old one | 14:35 |
amotoki | before we need to drop the config driver, we need to revisit our UT | 14:35 |
obondarev | I'd give some time for new driver to prove it's validity :) | 14:35 |
ralonsoh | ^^ exactly | 14:36 |
slaweq | my main concern is that if it will not be default, nobody will really test it | 14:36 |
slaweq | but maybe I'm wrong (hopefully) | 14:36 |
ralonsoh | I can change the default one to the new one | 14:36 |
ralonsoh | that will test this driver in all CI jobs | 14:36 |
ralonsoh | and in Y, deprecate the old one | 14:37 |
obondarev | +1 | 14:37 |
slaweq | IMHO that sounds like good plan - people may test our new driver and in case of issues, there is always easy way to get back to the old one | 14:37 |
slaweq | if all will be fine, we can simply deprecate and later delete old one | 14:38 |
ralonsoh | thank you all | 14:38 |
mlavalle | +1 | 14:39 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: thx for proposing that, and let's go with that :) | 14:40 |
ralonsoh | thanks | 14:40 |
slaweq | any other topics You want to discuss today? | 14:40 |
slaweq | if not, I will give You about 20 minutes back :) | 14:40 |
slaweq | ok, so thx for attending the meeting | 14:41 |
ralonsoh | bye | 14:41 |
mlavalle | o/ | 14:41 |
slaweq | ahh, one more thing | 14:41 |
slaweq | sorry, I forgot | 14:41 |
slaweq | bug deputy | 14:41 |
mlavalle | LOL | 14:41 |
slaweq | this week it's obondarev's turn | 14:42 |
slaweq | and next week we are starting new round | 14:42 |
obondarev | ack | 14:42 |
slaweq | so please check https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#Bug_deputy | 14:42 |
slaweq | and if it's not good for You, please let me know so I can change it if needed | 14:42 |
slaweq | now, it's all done :) | 14:42 |
mlavalle | \o/ | 14:43 |
slaweq | thx for attending the meeting and see You all online | 14:43 |
slaweq | o/ | 14:43 |
slaweq | #endmeeting | 14:43 |
lajoskatona | o/ | 14:43 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 14:43 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue May 11 14:43:21 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:43 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2021/networking.2021-05-11-14.01.html | 14:43 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2021/networking.2021-05-11-14.01.txt | 14:43 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2021/networking.2021-05-11-14.01.log.html | 14:43 |
rubasov | o/ | 14:43 |
amotoki | o/ | 14:43 |
mlavalle | o/ | 14:43 |
mlavalle | for good now | 14:43 |
*** obondarev has quit IRC | 14:45 | |
slaweq | #startmeeting neutron_ci | 15:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue May 11 15:01:21 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:01 |
slaweq | hi | 15:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:01 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ci' | 15:01 |
ralonsoh | hi | 15:01 |
lajoskatona | Hi | 15:01 |
slaweq | Grafana dashboard: http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/neutron-failure-rate | 15:02 |
slaweq | I think we can start now | 15:02 |
slaweq | #topic Actions from previous meetings | 15:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from previous meetings (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:02 | |
slaweq | ralonsoh to mark test_keepalived_spawns_conflicting_pid_vrrp_subprocess functional test as unstable | 15:02 |
ralonsoh | ok, that won't fix the CI | 15:03 |
ralonsoh | because this test is timing out | 15:03 |
ralonsoh | and that cannot be marked as unstable | 15:03 |
slaweq | how often it happens? do You remember? | 15:04 |
ralonsoh | not too often, but still too much | 15:04 |
ralonsoh | this is because the sigterm signal does not reply | 15:04 |
ralonsoh | even with shell "kill" command (same as with os.kill) | 15:04 |
ralonsoh | I was working in a patch for privsep | 15:05 |
ralonsoh | but I never finished it | 15:05 |
ralonsoh | I'll continue with this one, but I'll need time | 15:05 |
slaweq | sure | 15:06 |
slaweq | maybe we should simply skip those tests for now? | 15:06 |
ralonsoh | I think so, I'll send a patch | 15:07 |
slaweq | ++ | 15:07 |
slaweq | #action ralonsoh to skip test_keepalived_spawns_conflicting_pid_vrrp_subprocess functional tests | 15:07 |
slaweq | ok, next one | 15:07 |
slaweq | lajoskatona to check stadium job's and what needs to be switched to ovs explicity | 15:07 |
lajoskatona | Yeah, I have to run through it again, but as I remember we are ok | 15:08 |
slaweq | that's good news, thanks lajoskatona | 15:08 |
slaweq | and what about networking-sfc? this one has to be switched right? | 15:08 |
lajoskatona | yes | 15:10 |
slaweq | k | 15:10 |
slaweq | can You send patches to switch that one? | 15:11 |
slaweq | or maybe bcafarel already did that? | 15:11 |
lajoskatona | yes, I can, | 15:11 |
slaweq | thx a lot | 15:11 |
slaweq | #action lajoskatona to switch networking-sfc jobs to ovs explicitly | 15:11 |
slaweq | next one ralonsoh or lajoskatona will add logging of the console log, related to the https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1926109 | 15:12 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1926109 in neutron "SSH timeout (wait timeout) due to potential paramiko issue" [Critical,New] | 15:12 |
lajoskatona | I checked this one and as I see we log console log everywhere, but for some reason it is not always logged to subunit html report | 15:13 |
lajoskatona | only in tempest.log | 15:13 |
slaweq | ahh, ok | 15:15 |
slaweq | good to know | 15:15 |
slaweq | so we need to check in tempest.log in such case | 15:16 |
slaweq | thx | 15:16 |
slaweq | ok, next one | 15:16 |
slaweq | slaweq to check frequency of the multicast issue in the ovn job and report a LP bug for that | 15:16 |
slaweq | I checked and opened bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1926780 | 15:16 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1926780 in neutron "Multicast traffic scenario test is failing sometimes on OVN job" [High,Confirmed] | 15:16 |
slaweq | but I didn't had time to look at it more | 15:16 |
slaweq | ok, next one | 15:17 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: to check periodic nftables jobs | 15:17 |
ralonsoh | done and merged | 15:18 |
ralonsoh | (I'll find the patch) | 15:18 |
slaweq | thank You :) | 15:18 |
slaweq | no need, we trust You ;) | 15:18 |
ralonsoh | hehehe thanks | 15:18 |
slaweq | ok, let's move on | 15:18 |
slaweq | #topic Stadium projects | 15:18 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Stadium projects (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:18 | |
slaweq | lajoskatona: anything regarding stadium projects ci? | 15:18 |
lajoskatona | nothing, as I remmeber from the week | 15:20 |
slaweq | great :) | 15:20 |
slaweq | that's news which I like in this meeting ;) | 15:20 |
lajoskatona | for bgpvpn (or bagpipe?) I pushed patches for stable brancehs to make l-c job non-voting | 15:20 |
slaweq | #topic Stable branches | 15:20 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Stable branches (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:20 | |
lajoskatona | yeah so this overlaps the next topic :-) | 15:21 |
slaweq | thx, I will review that patch | 15:21 |
slaweq | regarding stable branches, I have just one thing | 15:21 |
lajoskatona | this one is active, and I hope can be backported: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/+/743487 | 15:21 |
slaweq | just few minutes ago there was proposed patch to go to EM phase in train | 15:21 |
slaweq | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790760 | 15:22 |
slaweq | when this will be done we should pin neutron-tempest-plugin in stable/train jobs and remove them from the check/gate queues in neutron-tempest-plugin repo | 15:22 |
slaweq | I will do it this week | 15:22 |
lajoskatona | +1 | 15:22 |
slaweq | #action slaweq to pin neutron-tempest-plugin for train after it will be EM | 15:23 |
slaweq | other than that I didn't saw any issues with stable branches and ci | 15:23 |
slaweq | things are merging pretty ok AFAICT | 15:23 |
slaweq | I think we can move on | 15:25 |
slaweq | #topic Grafana | 15:25 |
slaweq | #link http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/neutron-failure-rate | 15:25 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Grafana (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:25 | |
slaweq | I don't see any serious issues there recently | 15:26 |
slaweq | seems like things are running pretty ok | 15:26 |
slaweq | except failures which we already know | 15:26 |
slaweq | we should maybe go with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/788412 to make our neutron-tempest-plugin jobs to be more stable | 15:27 |
lajoskatona | Nearly offtopic: have you read the mail about stopping logstash? | 15:27 |
slaweq | lajoskatona: yes, I read it today and I'm sad about that :/ | 15:27 |
lajoskatona | it was not perfect but better than nothing :-( | 15:28 |
slaweq | yeah | 15:28 |
lajoskatona | sorry for disturbing... | 15:28 |
slaweq | no problem at all | 15:29 |
ralonsoh | +w to this patch | 15:29 |
slaweq | if You know about any alternative, I will be very happy to listen about it :) | 15:29 |
slaweq | thx ralonsoh | 15:29 |
slaweq | ok, let's move on | 15:31 |
slaweq | tbh I didn't found any new serious issues worth to discuss here today | 15:32 |
slaweq | I did found few functional tests failures, but each of them were just one time failure so far | 15:32 |
slaweq | I listed them in the https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-ci-meetings | 15:32 |
slaweq | other than that there are only known issues which I saw in our ci | 15:33 |
slaweq | do You maybe have any issues which You would like to discuss? | 15:33 |
ralonsoh | well, FT CI job is not very stable | 15:33 |
ralonsoh | i've seen a lot of timeouts recentlyt | 15:34 |
ralonsoh | but I din't find the cause | 15:34 |
slaweq | hmm | 15:34 |
slaweq | I didn't saw many timeouts when I was checking that | 15:34 |
slaweq | but I will check once again, maybe I missed something | 15:34 |
slaweq | #action slaweq to check functional job timeouts | 15:34 |
slaweq | and that's basically all from me for today | 15:37 |
slaweq | if You don't have anything else, we can finish meeting earlier | 15:37 |
ralonsoh | no, thanks | 15:37 |
lajoskatona | \o/ | 15:37 |
slaweq | ok | 15:38 |
slaweq | thx for attending the meeting | 15:38 |
slaweq | and have a great evening :) | 15:38 |
slaweq | o/ | 15:38 |
slaweq | #endmeeting | 15:38 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:38 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue May 11 15:38:18 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:38 |
ralonsoh | bye! | 15:38 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2021/neutron_ci.2021-05-11-15.01.html | 15:38 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2021/neutron_ci.2021-05-11-15.01.txt | 15:38 |
lajoskatona | bye | 15:38 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2021/neutron_ci.2021-05-11-15.01.log.html | 15:38 |
*** psahoo_ has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:55 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
*** lajoskatona has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
*** srwilkers has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 20:13 | |
*** srwilkers has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 20:13 | |
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 20:13 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
*** mlavalle has quit IRC | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!