*** macz_ has quit IRC | 01:15 | |
*** mlavalle has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 01:42 | |
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:12 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:36 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 02:41 | |
*** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 03:27 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:25 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:23 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:29 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:35 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:04 | |
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:46 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
*** hongbin has quit IRC | 10:36 | |
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:37 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:34 | |
*** hongbin has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 12:07 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:08 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:18 | |
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:54 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:30 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:44 | |
*** Luzi has quit IRC | 14:32 | |
*** artom has quit IRC | 14:37 | |
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:37 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:22 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:23 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:35 | |
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:54 | |
*** lyarwood has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:55 | |
*** elod has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:58 | |
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:59 | |
gibi | #startmeeting nova | 16:00 |
---|---|---|
openstack | Meeting started Thu Nov 12 16:00:05 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | 16:00 |
lyarwood | \o | 16:00 |
stephenfin | o/ | 16:00 |
dansmith | o/ | 16:00 |
gibi | o/ | 16:00 |
gibi | the openstack wallaby community call is happening in parallel. The project updates are pre-recorded so I try to be present on both meeting | 16:00 |
gibi | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | 16:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (stuck/critical) (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:01 | |
gibi | no critical bugs | 16:01 |
gibi | #link 12 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New | 16:01 |
gmann | o/ | 16:02 |
gibi | #link 0 bugs in fix-commited state (-19 since last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.searchtext=&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED | 16:02 |
gibi | I've moved all of these from fix-commmited to fix-released state. | 16:02 |
gibi | so I will drop this from the agenda, I don't expect new bugs will end up in this status in the future | 16:02 |
lyarwood | cool thanks gibi | 16:03 |
gibi | #link 73 bugs are in INPROGRESS state without any tag (+1 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=-*&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS | 16:03 |
gibi | these are potentially un-triaged bugs. Check if they are still valid | 16:03 |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:03 | |
gibi | is there any bug we need to talk about here? | 16:04 |
gibi | #topic Gate status | 16:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Gate status (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:05 | |
gibi | 69 (+54 since the last meeting) unclassified gate failures, classification rate 28% (-18 since the last meeting) #link http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html | 16:05 |
gibi | Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | 16:05 |
gibi | I've filed one new today https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1903979 | 16:05 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1903979 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-live-migration job fails during evacuate negative test" [High,Confirmed] | 16:05 |
stephenfin | I'm seeing a lot of "qemu monitor disconnected" errors in the nova-live-migrate jobs | 16:05 |
stephenfin | I assume those are already using Focal? | 16:05 |
lyarwood | stephenfin: during the actual live migration runs? | 16:05 |
lyarwood | stephenfin: and yeah it's switched over to focal now | 16:06 |
stephenfin | not totally sure - I'll check | 16:06 |
stephenfin | I think so though | 16:06 |
stephenfin | the test fails because the instance doesn't change host because the migration failed | 16:06 |
stephenfin | Also, https://review.opendev.org/762543 would be a good one to add to the review queues. I've seen that race pop up at least once recently | 16:07 |
lyarwood | stephenfin: kk lets ping kashyap | 16:07 |
stephenfin | will do | 16:07 |
gibi | stephenfin: queued the race fix now | 16:07 |
lyarwood | stephenfin: do you want to write a bug for that | 16:07 |
stephenfin | sure | 16:07 |
lyarwood | stephenfin: as I assume it applies to stable/victoria etc | 16:07 |
stephenfin | yup, fair point | 16:07 |
lyarwood | thanks | 16:08 |
gibi | thanks | 16:08 |
* stephenfin hopes he can find the original failure to reference :) | 16:08 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
gibi | any other gate failures that needs discussion | 16:08 |
gibi | ? | 16:08 |
gibi | #topic Release Planning | 16:09 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Release Planning (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:09 | |
gibi | Wallaby Milestone 1 is on 3rd of December, which is 3 weeks from now | 16:09 |
gibi | We should focus on updating / reviewing spec based on the PTG discussions | 16:09 |
gibi | I proposed a spec review day on the ML for 17th of November (Tuesday): #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018564.html | 16:09 |
gibi | any other info related to the release? | 16:10 |
tbarron | Is the deadline for merge of specs Milestone 1? (Don't see that on the Wallaby releae calendar). | 16:11 |
gibi | tbarron: spec freeze is M2 | 16:11 |
tbarron | gibi: ty | 16:11 |
gibi | tbarron: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Wallaby_Release_Schedule | 16:11 |
tbarron | gibi: ty, i was looking at the wrong calendar | 16:12 |
tbarron | the global one | 16:12 |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:12 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 16:12 | |
gibi | yeah, I guess there is a way to add nova specific things there | 16:12 |
tbarron | gibi: manila litters that one, no opinion on my part as to how you do it | 16:13 |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:13 | |
tbarron | this is bookmarked now | 16:13 |
gibi | OK, cool | 16:13 |
gibi | #topic Stable Branches | 16:13 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Stable Branches (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:13 | |
gibi | elod left comments on the wiki I will copy now | 16:13 |
gibi | final Stein release is done (19.3.2) -- stein-em tagging is on the way: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762408/ | 16:13 |
gibi | new versions on Train (20.4.1), Ussuri (21.1.1) also released, Victoria release is still waiting for upgrade fix patch to merge (https://review.opendev.org/#/c/761639/ -- any other must-have for Victoria release?) | 16:14 |
gibi | EOM | 16:14 |
lyarwood | I don't have anything, elod++ for pushing all of that along :) | 16:14 |
gibi | thanks elod | 16:14 |
elod | lyarwood: ack :) | 16:14 |
gibi | I don't have other than the already tracked https://review.opendev.org/#/c/761639/ for victoria | 16:15 |
gibi | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | 16:16 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Sub/related team Highlights (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:16 | |
gibi | API (gmann) | 16:16 |
gmann | nothing from my side on API | 16:17 |
gibi | Libvirt (bauzas) | 16:17 |
gibi | I guess he is not with us today | 16:19 |
gibi | #topic Open discussion | 16:19 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:19 | |
gibi | there is an time from stephenfin on the agenda | 16:19 |
gibi | (stephenfin) Specless blueprint approval. Support for virtio-based input devices https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756552/ | 16:19 |
gibi | Identified while trying to remove unnecessary USB interfaces for realtime | 16:19 |
gibi | We already support virtio-based disk and network interfaces. They're higher performance and their use can remove the need for a USB controller. | 16:19 |
gibi | is there any objection to approve this as specless? | 16:20 |
gibi | stephenfin: I guess you haven't filed the bp yet | 16:21 |
lyarwood | None from me. | 16:21 |
stephenfin | oh, damn, no. two secs :) | 16:21 |
gibi | stephenfin: no worries, ping me later when you have the link | 16:22 |
stephenfin | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/virtio-based-input-devices | 16:22 |
dansmith | what's the trigger, config or flavor? | 16:22 |
stephenfin | image metadata | 16:22 |
stephenfin | to mimic what we do for e.g. disk buses | 16:22 |
dansmith | er, yeah, so a new key there akin do the disk controller? | 16:23 |
dansmith | yeah | 16:23 |
stephenfin | yarp | 16:23 |
stephenfin | hw_input_bus | 16:23 |
dansmith | seems straightforward to me | 16:23 |
gibi | looks good to me too | 16:23 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:23 | |
gibi | no objectsion so it is approved for W | 16:24 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:24 | |
dansmith | do we always do usb tablet now? | 16:24 |
dansmith | or are you going to make it ps2|usb|virtio? | 16:24 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
stephenfin | by default, yes | 16:24 |
stephenfin | though devstack overrides that default | 16:24 |
dansmith | don't we have a way to do ps2 tho? | 16:24 |
stephenfin | not on a per-instance basis | 16:25 |
dansmith | I was thinking that was config, hence my question about how we're triggering | 16:25 |
stephenfin | it's host-level config | 16:25 |
dansmith | yeah, | 16:25 |
stephenfin | [compute] point_model = ps2mouse | 16:25 |
dansmith | so do we need to deprecate/remove that config or what's the interaction between that and the metadata trigger? | 16:25 |
dansmith | always prefer image if the image specifies? | 16:25 |
stephenfin | I'm doing the latter | 16:26 |
stephenfin | and I'd like to deprecate the host-level config eventually, but I think we should let this bake in | 16:26 |
dansmith | oh, we already have hw_pointer_model | 16:27 |
dansmith | can we not just add virtio to that? | 16:27 |
stephenfin | No really. That currently munges two things: type of input device and bus used | 16:27 |
stephenfin | *not | 16:27 |
stephenfin | type being pointer or tablet; bus being ps2, usb or virtio | 16:27 |
dansmith | well, it's either ps2mouse (bus=ps2) or usbtablet (bus=tablet) | 16:28 |
dansmith | are you going to have both mouse and tablet via virtio? | 16:28 |
stephenfin | I thought that would be the most sensible approach | 16:28 |
stephenfin | hw_pointer_model = (mouse|tablet) | 16:29 |
stephenfin | hw_input_bus = (usb|virtio) | 16:29 |
stephenfin | I have an open question about whether we want to support ps2 that way, given its legacy, x86-only nature | 16:29 |
dansmith | is that what hw_pointer_model takes now? that differs from the config | 16:29 |
stephenfin | it currently only takes usbtablet | 16:29 |
dansmith | well, I'm just trying to figure out what the set of options are, given we have the config, the existing pointer key and the new bus | 16:30 |
dansmith | right, so, I guess I don't really see why we wouldn't just add virtiotablet in there and call it done | 16:30 |
dansmith | there's really no reason to have relative movement except for compatibility, which virtio does away with anyway | 16:30 |
stephenfin | hw_pointer_model=usbtablet will be translated to hw_pointer_model=tablet and hw_input_bus=tablet | 16:30 |
*** elod has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
dansmith | and we have to validate/reject if someone configures pointer=usbtablet and bus=virtio ... | 16:31 |
stephenfin | I've no serious issues with that. Separate config made more sense to me, but keeping the munging also works | 16:31 |
stephenfin | Yup, we would | 16:32 |
stephenfin | (I've already done just that, fwiw https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756552/3/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py) | 16:32 |
dansmith | there's just a flow chart involved in explaining all the options if you expand it out, plus the validation... if you just add one more option there with virtiotablet then it's much simpler, IMHO | 16:32 |
*** elod has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:32 | |
stephenfin | oh, wait | 16:32 |
dansmith | that validation happens very late though | 16:32 |
stephenfin | I know why I did separate buses | 16:33 |
stephenfin | we also have keyboards | 16:33 |
stephenfin | so you want some way to say what the bus for that is | 16:33 |
dansmith | but certainly not different busses for each right? | 16:33 |
stephenfin | no | 16:33 |
stephenfin | hw_input_bus handles both | 16:33 |
dansmith | ...so you can just assume whatever pointer method is being used is also used for the keyboard right? | 16:34 |
dansmith | i.e. usbtablet means usb keyboard, virtiotablet means virtio keyboard | 16:34 |
stephenfin | you could, but that's a lot of extrapolation and poor UX. I'd rather default to pointer model to tablet if the input bus was set to USB or virtio | 16:35 |
stephenfin | I mean, if we're going with "doing X also results in Y"-type behavior | 16:35 |
dansmith | well, adding a new key to expand the surface area and checking super late in virt config and just exploding there if it's wrong really isn't good UX | 16:35 |
stephenfin | True. That's already a risk though | 16:36 |
dansmith | and "virtiotablet" doesn't offer the possibility to ask for a virtio mouse, which is also good in that it doesn't lead people to make dumb decisions just because you can configure it that way | 16:36 |
stephenfin | We don't know that the hypervisor supports a specific bus | 16:36 |
stephenfin | Including virtio | 16:36 |
dansmith | sure, but the number of ways to configure an invalid thing is far fewer | 16:37 |
stephenfin | True | 16:37 |
stephenfin | Can we continue this on openstack-nova? | 16:37 |
dansmith | anyway, nobody else seems to care about this, so we don't need to make them watch | 16:37 |
dansmith | heh, yes | 16:37 |
stephenfin | cool :) | 16:37 |
gibi | :) | 16:37 |
gibi | OK, then I will keep the bp pending so you can agree on this question | 16:37 |
gibi | but when you agreed the bp will be approved | 16:38 |
gibi | I have one more item | 16:38 |
stephenfin | Well, the idea is okay? It's just how we implement it that's up for debate? | 16:38 |
dansmith | no need to hold it up, IMHO, just approve it and we can change the text if need be | 16:38 |
dansmith | yeah ^ | 16:38 |
gibi | dansmith, stephenfin: OK then I will approve it after the meeting | 16:38 |
stephenfin | thanks | 16:39 |
gibi | so my item is http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018663.html | 16:39 |
gibi | this is the patch that breaks the nova-compute if DB is configured | 16:39 |
gibi | it seems there are additional things falling out from it | 16:40 |
gibi | 1) the packaging and deployer tools asking for information about which config is needed for which service | 16:40 |
gibi | I don't think we have definit information about this | 16:40 |
stephenfin | to do 1) properly, we'd need to rework how we gather config opts | 16:41 |
gibi | yeah, this is not easy to automate | 16:41 |
dansmith | we don't have to automate it | 16:41 |
dansmith | because we don't need (IMHO) to do it for every one of our billion opts | 16:41 |
dansmith | we could make things much better, | 16:42 |
gmann | is doc not enough for that ? | 16:42 |
dansmith | if we identified a minimal set of configs that have to be set to have a working nova, | 16:42 |
dansmith | and then annotate those with where they need to be set | 16:42 |
dansmith | it won't fix the world, but it would make things quite a bit better, and the deployment tools are mostly concerned with minimal config I think | 16:42 |
gibi | and I guess devstack does the minimal set already | 16:43 |
dansmith | database, api database, transport_url, etc.. make sure the docs for those configs are clear about which service needs them | 16:43 |
dansmith | yes | 16:43 |
dansmith | presumably we could also ask deployment tools for a set of configs they always set | 16:43 |
gibi | then I will file doc bug to document this based on devstack | 16:43 |
gmann | we can divide the doc section with mandatory vs optional | 16:43 |
stephenfin | The proper answer is to do what (I think) glance etc. do and register different opts to different namespaces. Most 'nova.conf.*' modules expose 'register_opts' and 'register_console_opts' functions; ideally we'd have 'register_compute_opts', 'register_scheduler_opts', etc. That's a whole pile of work though | 16:43 |
dansmith | but devstack should be the reference | 16:43 |
gmann | we had same question many times in tempest also when we had ~300 config opt | 16:44 |
stephenfin | dansmith: when you say annotate, do you mean add a new attribute or include in opt help strings? | 16:44 |
stephenfin | *include info | 16:44 |
dansmith | stephenfin: it is, and IMHO, the glance situation really sucks | 16:44 |
dansmith | stephenfin: I mean just a pattern like "related opts" or whatever we do now for linking related things.. | 16:44 |
stephenfin | dansmith: Yeah, as someone who usually likes this kind of work, narp on this. Reworking the config last time took forever and we'd OSIC peeps to help /o\ | 16:45 |
stephenfin | hmm, I can't picture that | 16:45 |
dansmith | stephenfin: narp on which? | 16:45 |
stephenfin | sorry, narp on doing service-based opt registration | 16:45 |
stephenfin | the big rework idea | 16:45 |
gmann | or we can make all optional as default to None always ? and code assume None means not set/configured? | 16:46 |
stephenfin | yes to annotation, once I figure out how that works | 16:46 |
dansmith | stephenfin: I mean this: https://pastebin.com/czCwqquw | 16:46 |
dansmith | stephenfin: for the <20 options that are really required for things to work | 16:46 |
gibi | gmann: without db and amqp config services will fail to start | 16:46 |
stephenfin | Ah, yes. That makes sense to me | 16:46 |
dansmith | stephenfin: yes, very very narp on service-based opts from me too | 16:47 |
gmann | gibi: yeah i mean that is mandatory opt so need to be set. so no default for them | 16:47 |
* dansmith doesn't know what narps are but assumes they can be different sizes | 16:47 | |
stephenfin | dansmith: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir1sVy9JLyo | 16:47 |
gibi | I will file a bug based on the above and see where we can go with it | 16:47 |
gibi | there is another fallout | 16:48 |
gibi | for wsgi services we predefine the config file the wsgi app will load | 16:48 |
gibi | and for nova-api it is nova.conf and api_paste.ini | 16:48 |
gibi | as far as I understand this means that another config cannot be provided like nova-db.conf | 16:49 |
dansmith | this is really not our problem, IMHO | 16:49 |
stephenfin | gibi: Can we not invert this like devstack does | 16:49 |
dansmith | if you're doing this all-in-one, then configure nova-compute to load /etc/nova/nova-cpu.conf or something just like devstack does | 16:49 |
stephenfin | nova.conf for everything != nova-compute | 16:49 |
dansmith | exactly | 16:49 |
stephenfin | nova-cpu.conf for nova-compute | 16:49 |
stephenfin | yup | 16:49 |
gibi | yeah that works | 16:49 |
gmann | yeah | 16:49 |
dansmith | this is a deployment thing.. all deployments can copy files | 16:50 |
gmann | we can add devstack way as ref link in doc. | 16:50 |
stephenfin | Good enough for DevStack, good enough for me (TM) | 16:50 |
gibi | OK, I don't have anything else for this topic | 16:50 |
gibi | any other topics for today? | 16:51 |
dansmith | narp? | 16:51 |
gibi | narp :) | 16:51 |
gibi | thanks for joining | 16:52 |
stephenfin | got it in one | 16:52 |
gibi | stephenfin: ? | 16:52 |
stephenfin | nvm :) nothing from me | 16:52 |
gibi | OK | 16:52 |
gibi | cool | 16:52 |
gibi | #endmeeting | 16:52 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 16:52 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Thu Nov 12 16:52:37 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:52 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-11-12-16.00.html | 16:52 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-11-12-16.00.txt | 16:52 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-11-12-16.00.log.html | 16:52 |
*** elod has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:59 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:14 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:21 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:31 | |
*** artom has quit IRC | 21:15 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:33 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:41 | |
*** raildo has quit IRC | 22:07 | |
*** persia has quit IRC | 22:31 | |
*** persia has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 22:32 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 22:44 | |
*** _mlavalle_1 has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:21 | |
*** baojg has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
*** lyarwood has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
*** lyarwood has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:24 | |
*** mlavalle has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
*** baojg has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 23:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!