| *** tosky has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** brinzhang has joined #openstack-manila | 01:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | Andre Beltrami proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add security service to share networks https://review.opendev.org/728604 | 01:31 |
|---|---|---|
| *** andrebeltrami has joined #openstack-manila | 01:32 | |
| *** andreaf has quit IRC | 02:28 | |
| *** brinzhang has quit IRC | 03:05 | |
| *** andreaf has joined #openstack-manila | 03:25 | |
| *** andrebeltrami has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
| *** haixin has joined #openstack-manila | 03:59 | |
| *** haixin has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
| *** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila | 04:59 | |
| *** maaritamm has quit IRC | 05:52 | |
| *** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila | 05:53 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-manila | 07:28 | |
| *** maaritamm has quit IRC | 08:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/manila master: Make volume mount path configurable for ContainerShareDriver https://review.opendev.org/731748 | 08:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Liron Kuchlani proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Preparation for support scenario tests on CephFS Native https://review.opendev.org/725487 | 08:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/manila master: Make volume mount path configurable for ContainerShareDriver https://review.opendev.org/731748 | 10:40 |
| openstackgerrit | Andre Beltrami proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add security service to share networks https://review.opendev.org/728604 | 11:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Andre Beltrami proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add security service to share networks https://review.opendev.org/728604 | 11:15 |
| *** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila | 11:44 | |
| *** erolg has joined #openstack-manila | 12:34 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Shared File System Service | Victoria cycle Virtual Project Technical Gathering is underway: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/vancouver-ptg-manila-planning" | 12:54 | |
| gouthamr | o/ hello everyone, we're gathering in https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/cactus in ~1 hour, our schedule for the day is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/vancouver-ptg-manila-planning ... We'll begin with a retrospective of the Ussuri cycle, please add your thoughts here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-ussuri-retrospective | 12:56 |
| *** andrebeltrami has joined #openstack-manila | 13:02 | |
| *** yan0s has joined #openstack-manila | 13:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Liron Kuchlani proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Preparation for support scenario tests on CephFS Native https://review.opendev.org/725487 | 13:14 |
| *** haixin has joined #openstack-manila | 13:14 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 13:22 | |
| *** haixin has quit IRC | 13:47 | |
| *** haixin has joined #openstack-manila | 13:47 | |
| gouthamr | o/ again, we start in https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/cactus in 15 mins, please remember to check your emails for the password to that meeting.. if you've registered, you should have seen an email with the subject "24 hours left until the PTG!" with the joining details | 13:47 |
| gouthamr | ..13 mins.. | 13:48 |
| gouthamr | ofcourse you can ping vkmc / me if you'd like the password :) | 13:48 |
| * gouthamr ohboy, tech troubles | 14:00 | |
| gouthamr | are you all able to get to the zoom room at https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/cactus ? | 14:00 |
| haixin | i am trying.... | 14:01 |
| gouthamr | i'm attempting to update zoom in case that lets me join | 14:02 |
| haixin | i have join | 14:05 |
| gouthamr | haixin: great | 14:07 |
| gouthamr | gimme a couple of minutes, folks - debugging with aprice | 14:07 |
| haixin | i lost the connection, i am trying to connect again.sorry | 14:50 |
| *** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:52 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 14:58 | |
| *** raildo has joined #openstack-manila | 15:00 | |
| raildo | gouthamr, hey, can you poke me here when we get the policy topic? I need to join other session here | 15:01 |
| gouthamr | raildo: absolutely, sorry we're running late | 15:02 |
| raildo | I'll keep my eyes in the current topic on the ptg page as well :) | 15:02 |
| raildo | gouthamr, no worries at all, it's was fun :) glad to see so many ppl contributing for manila :D | 15:02 |
| openstackgerrit | Liron Kuchlani proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Preparation for support scenario tests on CephFS Native https://review.opendev.org/725487 | 15:48 |
| *** strigazi has joined #openstack-manila | 16:21 | |
| *** jv_ has joined #openstack-manila | 16:41 | |
| tbarron | vkmc: thanks for running the bot! | 16:56 |
| vkmc | tbarron, anytime | 16:56 |
| *** haixin has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| tbarron | gouthamr: you had better attendance than the physical PTG sessions! | 16:56 |
| gouthamr | tbarron: agreed! it's really cool to have so many folks show up for a virtual meeting - the format worked great, at least for day 1 | 17:06 |
| *** tkajinam has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** maaritamm has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Andre Beltrami proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add security service to share networks https://review.opendev.org/728604 | 17:54 |
| *** erolg has quit IRC | 18:03 | |
| *** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila | 18:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Liron Kuchlani proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Preparation for support scenario tests on CephFS Native https://review.opendev.org/725487 | 18:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/puppet-manila master: Update Puppet requirement to >= 6.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/731907 | 19:04 |
| dviroel | ping gouthamr andrebeltrami | 19:07 |
| dviroel | re adding security services to share networks on tempest tests | 19:07 |
| dviroel | if we plan to add and remove security services on class cleanup | 19:08 |
| dviroel | make sense to reuse them? | 19:08 |
| dviroel | seems that is causing some issue on concurrent tests | 19:08 |
| dviroel | and during class teardown, might even fail if the current share network is being used by another test | 19:09 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: o/ reuse the security services alone? or the share network as well? | 19:10 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: both | 19:10 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: it seems that reuse share networks cause more problems | 19:10 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: since we are considering deleting them at class teardown | 19:10 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: hmmm, i want to understand this a bit better, so thinking aloud a bit here | 19:10 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: we reuse share networks because of reasons that are now partially antiquated | 19:11 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: if we plan to delete the security services at the end of the test class, we can't reuse the share network, because we are removing the security service from them | 19:11 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: if we were to avoid this reuse, will it solve your problem | 19:11 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: ack, so if we plan on not reusing the security services, you might be creating duplicates of these in your tests, which, as long as cleaned up entirely, shouldn't be a problem | 19:12 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: agree | 19:12 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: iirc we don't have a quota on how many security services can be created... | 19:13 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: yeah, we don't have at this moment | 19:13 |
| dviroel | andrebeltrami: did you try to remove the reuse part from both sec. service and share networks? | 19:13 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: which is a bug really, but, we don't expect these to scale to the hundreds either.. | 19:13 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: side-question, is quota control part of your security services improvements topic at the PTG? | 19:14 |
| andrebeltrami | for the share networks not! | 19:14 |
| dviroel | andrebeltrami: so can you give a try? on upstream jobs? since our CI doesn't have a high concurrency enabled | 19:14 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: no, its not. But we can discuss a little bit about it | 19:15 |
| andrebeltrami | dviroel: Sure, I will try! Maybe we can cleanup at the method level the share networks created by the provide_share_network method. What do you thing guys? | 19:17 |
| dviroel | andrebeltrami: share networks created at test level can be deleted at method level, but most of the classes set up a share network in class set up, which means that we can delete them at class teardown only | 19:18 |
| dviroel | andrebeltrami: since you changes the provide_share_network to use Base class methods instead of directly call the client to create new share networks, its easy to handle both scenarios by passing the cleanup_in_class paremeter | 19:20 |
| dviroel | s/changes/changed | 19:20 |
| andrebeltrami | dviroel: ack | 19:23 |
| *** maaritamm has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
| *** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila | 19:52 | |
| *** maaritamm has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
| *** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila | 20:07 | |
| *** jv_ has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
| *** jv_ has joined #openstack-manila | 20:15 | |
| *** jv_ has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
| *** jv_ has joined #openstack-manila | 20:15 | |
| *** raildo_ has joined #openstack-manila | 20:49 | |
| *** raildo has quit IRC | 20:52 | |
| *** yan0s has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** maaritamm has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
| * gouthamr all - I posted a schedule change announcement: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015199.html | 21:38 | |
| gouthamr | tl;dr: (1) tomorrow's 1st session will only last 45 minutes, instead of 2 hours - allowing folks to participate in other parallel discussions... | 21:39 |
| gouthamr | (2) we're gaining tomorrow's lost hour on friday by meeting earlier - 1300 UTC | 21:40 |
| *** jv_ is now known as jv|afk | 22:12 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-manila | 22:32 | |
| *** tkajinam has joined #openstack-manila | 22:47 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!