| *** gcb has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
| *** Administrator_ has quit IRC | 00:04 | |
| *** Administrator_ has joined #openstack-manila | 00:05 | |
| *** markstur has joined #openstack-manila | 00:05 | |
| *** markstur has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
| *** mtanino_ has joined #openstack-manila | 00:23 | |
| *** mtanino has quit IRC | 00:25 | |
| *** cdelatte has joined #openstack-manila | 00:30 | |
| *** cdelatte has quit IRC | 00:30 | |
| *** markstur has joined #openstack-manila | 00:30 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 00:52 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 00:57 | |
| *** gcb has joined #openstack-manila | 01:16 | |
| *** mtanino_ has quit IRC | 02:11 | |
| *** tuanluong has joined #openstack-manila | 02:15 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 02:16 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 02:34 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 02:35 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 02:40 | |
| *** markstur has quit IRC | 02:46 | |
| *** chenying_ has quit IRC | 03:36 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 03:51 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 03:54 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 03:58 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 04:00 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 04:04 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-manila | 04:08 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 04:09 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC | 05:00 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-manila | 05:01 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 05:05 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
| *** rraja has joined #openstack-manila | 05:14 | |
| *** jprovazn has joined #openstack-manila | 05:22 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC | 05:27 | |
| *** tuanluong has quit IRC | 05:33 | |
| *** tuanluong has joined #openstack-manila | 05:58 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-manila | 06:02 | |
| *** markstur has joined #openstack-manila | 06:05 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 06:06 | |
| *** markstur has quit IRC | 06:10 | |
| *** mkoderer_ has joined #openstack-manila | 06:13 | |
| openstackgerrit | M V P Nitesh proposed openstack/manila master: Optimize the link address https://review.openstack.org/455523 | 06:15 |
|---|---|---|
| *** mkoderer_ has quit IRC | 06:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | M V P Nitesh proposed openstack/manila-image-elements master: Optimize the link address https://review.openstack.org/455525 | 06:21 |
| openstackgerrit | M V P Nitesh proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Optimize the link address https://review.openstack.org/455529 | 06:27 |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, good afternoon | 06:44 |
| openstackgerrit | M V P Nitesh proposed openstack/manila-ui master: Optimize the link address https://review.openstack.org/455545 | 06:44 |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, I wonder if you be around later today when goutham is online - we could discuss event_id column to speed up things | 06:45 |
| jprovazn | s/you be/you will be/ | 06:45 |
| openstackgerrit | M V P Nitesh proposed openstack/python-manilaclient master: Optimize the link address https://review.openstack.org/455547 | 06:48 |
| tommylikehu | hey jprovazn I am here | 07:01 |
| tommylikehu | would be online before 10pm utc+8, I think goutham is more like the first version in cinder. | 07:03 |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila | 07:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for infinite share https://review.openstack.org/452097 | 07:16 |
| *** chenying has joined #openstack-manila | 07:20 | |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, hi, if you will be online before 10pm utc+8, goutham should be around at that time | 07:21 |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, not sure what you mean by "goutham is more like the first version in cinder"? | 07:21 |
| tommylikehu | goutham is more like the implementation we already have in cinder :) | 07:24 |
| tommylikehu | jprovazn: he doesn't think we would have that much defined event_ids in manila, so we don't need to add the autpgenerated event_ids | 07:25 |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, my opinion regarding event_id is quite neutral - I prefer to align implementation in cinder and manila. I can see it beneficial as it provides the constant of detail field, on the other side I agree that if this detail constant would be returned thorugh api (so we return all parts from which event_id is generated), then there is no reason to have this event_id present and client can easily categorize messages hims | 07:29 |
| jprovazn | elf | 07:29 |
| tommylikehu | jprovazn: yes, I think the true issue behind the auto-generated decision is whether we should use event_id or action+detail to describe what happened inside | 07:33 |
| tommylikehu | If gouthamr has a strong opinion on that, I think maybe we could take the same step as cinder did, because it's easy to change or optimise in the future, | 07:35 |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, well, for manila spec gouthamr argued against presence of event_id, use of action+detail is probably fine (at least based on spec comments) | 07:37 |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, yes, if it turns out event_id is needed/wanted, it can be added in a next step. So if you are fine with not having it in cinder spec, I'll remove it from manila spec :) | 07:38 |
| tommylikehu | I am surely ok with that, thanks | 07:39 |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, cool | 07:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Jan Provaznik proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for user messages https://review.openstack.org/434277 | 07:47 |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/manila-ui master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/455567 | 07:54 |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 07:54 | |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 07:54 | |
| *** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-manila | 07:55 | |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 08:20 | |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 08:21 | |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 08:35 | |
| *** swapnil-nilangek has joined #openstack-manila | 08:37 | |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 08:38 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC | 08:45 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
| zhongjun_ | bswartz: ping | 08:51 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 09:03 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 09:04 | |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
| *** tinwood has quit IRC | 09:18 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-manila | 09:27 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Enhance update shares https://review.openstack.org/453553 | 09:27 |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for infinite share https://review.openstack.org/452097 | 09:28 |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Enhance update shares https://review.openstack.org/453553 | 09:32 |
| *** tinwood has joined #openstack-manila | 09:35 | |
| *** markstur has joined #openstack-manila | 09:42 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-manila | 09:44 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 09:46 | |
| *** markstur has quit IRC | 09:46 | |
| *** belmoreira has joined #openstack-manila | 09:47 | |
| *** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 09:57 | |
| *** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
| *** tuanluong_ has joined #openstack-manila | 10:02 | |
| *** rraja has quit IRC | 10:03 | |
| *** tuanluong has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
| *** swapnil-nilangek has quit IRC | 10:09 | |
| *** swapnil-nilangek has joined #openstack-manila | 10:13 | |
| *** makowals_ has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 10:36 | |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 10:38 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 10:48 | |
| *** dsariel has joined #openstack-manila | 10:48 | |
| *** swapnil-nilangek has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
| *** ganso has joined #openstack-manila | 11:14 | |
| *** rraja has joined #openstack-manila | 11:26 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 11:43 | |
| *** tuanluong_ has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
| *** dsariel has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
| *** dsariel has joined #openstack-manila | 12:11 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 12:14 | |
| *** dustins has joined #openstack-manila | 12:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila master: [WIP] Add quotas per share type support https://review.openstack.org/452158 | 12:18 |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
| zhongjun_ | vponomaryov: ping | 12:24 |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 12:26 | |
| zhongjun_ | vponomaryov: I only have two goals in two specs. 1. change logic of "ensure share" in more efficient way compared to current one.(need restart) 2. update share info without restart in enhance-ensure-share. I split of one spec to two, becuase of we wants spec goal more clear in one spec: please see this link. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446494/13/specs/pike/ensure-share.rst@14 We could discuss with bswartz. | 12:35 |
| *** scottda has joined #openstack-manila | 12:45 | |
| *** rraja has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
| vponomaryov | zhongjun_: pong | 13:10 |
| *** rraja has joined #openstack-manila | 13:16 | |
| vponomaryov | zhongjun_: second statement says "This spec should not refer to ensure_share", and you refer to it in both specs | 13:17 |
| vponomaryov | zhongjun_: so, split is not correct now considering this comment | 13:18 |
| *** erlon has joined #openstack-manila | 13:24 | |
| *** timcl1 has joined #openstack-manila | 13:31 | |
| *** porrua has joined #openstack-manila | 13:31 | |
| *** timcl has quit IRC | 13:34 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 13:34 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 14:00 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:00 | |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 14:05 | |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 14:06 | |
| *** timcl1 has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 14:11 | |
| *** Zhongjun__ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for share_groups quota resource https://review.openstack.org/452270 | 14:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for share_groups quota resource https://review.openstack.org/452270 | 14:18 |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 14:21 | |
| *** rraja has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
| *** porrua_ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:24 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: latest base images have mistakenly put python3 in some places expecting python2 causing widespread failure of docs patches - fixes are underway | 14:26 | |
| *** porrua has quit IRC | 14:27 | |
| gouthamr | vponomaryov: ^ :P | 14:33 |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr: i knew it is Ci problem, because it works locally | 14:34 |
| gouthamr | vponomaryov: i was going to give you credit for breaking it | 14:34 |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr: just it is unclear when starts workign again | 14:34 |
| gouthamr | vponomaryov: :) yes... 'spose we'll get another status update. | 14:35 |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr: sure, in any unknown situation you can blame me ^_^ | 14:35 |
| gouthamr | :D #thanksvponomaryov | 14:35 |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 14:36 | |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr: is Easter day is working day for you? | 14:36 |
| gouthamr | vponomaryov: it's sunday, isn't it.. | 14:37 |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr: monday, after it | 14:37 |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr: you know, each holiday that appears to happen on Sunday or Sat should be compensated with some working day | 14:38 |
| tommylikehu | ping zhongjun_ , gouthamr | 14:38 |
| gouthamr | vponomaryov: ah... no monday is a working day at NetApp. | 14:38 |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr: ok, ty for info | 14:38 |
| tommylikehu | gouthamr: thanks you are here | 14:39 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: hey! | 14:39 |
| Zhongjun__ | goutharmr: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266688/ hi | 14:39 |
| tommylikehu | I think we are proposing the same thing in manila and cinder | 14:40 |
| Zhongjun__ | gouthamr: Did you want to add regex filter in this spec? | 14:40 |
| tommylikehu | gouthamr: so you misunderstand the propose in manila that we are going to support regex? | 14:40 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: currently we support 'exact' filters... imo we shouldn't overload them | 14:41 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: i think we can accept regex as part of the same filters if wildcards are present | 14:42 |
| gouthamr | also, the spec doesn't propose limiting these filters to certain fields... | 14:43 |
| gouthamr | s/filters/'LIKE' searches | 14:43 |
| tommylikehu | why we should also introduce regex as well as like operator | 14:43 |
| tommylikehu | the last point make sense | 14:43 |
| tommylikehu | Zhongjun__: | 14:44 |
| tommylikehu | gouthamr: I am a little afraid whether I get your point on overload the exact filters | 14:46 |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: we have rolled back centos-7, fedora-25 and ubuntu-xenial images to the previous days release. Feel free to recheck your jobs now. | 14:47 | |
| *** markstur has joined #openstack-manila | 14:48 | |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
| Zhongjun__ | gouthamr: As the spec said: "Although we can provide filtering resource based on regex filter, but there is a possibility that we could have ReDos `[3]`_ attack." We don't support regex in this filter | 14:48 |
| *** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila | 14:49 | |
| tommylikehu | Zhongjun__: based on my understanding of gouthamr 's comments | 14:50 |
| tommylikehu | I think his concerns are about these two: | 14:51 |
| tommylikehu | 1. we should announce which column we would apply 'like' filter | 14:51 |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 14:52 | |
| *** markstur has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
| tommylikehu | 2. this change should not affect the original usages... | 14:53 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: +1 | 14:53 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: +1 | 14:53 |
| gouthamr | for both points... | 14:53 |
| gouthamr | Zhongjun__: sorry, was in a short meeting and will be leaving soon for another one... | 14:53 |
| gouthamr | Zhongjun__: i may not be understanding this entirely... correct me if i'm wrong.. we now have name=xyz returning all shares that are named xyz | 14:55 |
| gouthamr | Zhongjun__: after your change, we'll have name=xyz returning shares that begin with xyz | 14:55 |
| tommylikehu | include xyz | 14:55 |
| tommylikehu | or contains | 14:55 |
| Zhongjun__ | gouthamr: yes include xyz( 1_xyz_1 4_xyz) | 14:56 |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 14:56 | |
| Zhongjun__ | gouthamr:.op('LIKE')(u'%' + name + u'%')) | 14:56 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: okay.. i get your point about regex filtering, thanks. However, i still think we shouldn't overwrite the semantics of name=xyz for that.. | 14:57 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu, Zhongjun__: sorry got to run to this meeting. will comment on the patch if you respond to those comments | 14:57 |
| tommylikehu | gouthamr: what's your main concerns on that ? | 14:58 |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-manila | 14:58 | |
| tommylikehu | overwrite the semantics of name=xyz.. | 14:58 |
| *** belmoreira has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
| tommylikehu | gouthamr: you should be in meeting 2, so maybe please leave your comments there, thanks | 14:59 |
| tbarron | gouthamr: tommylikehu Zhongjun__ I think gouthamr should make his comment about overloading on the cinder spec too. We should drive that conversation to a consistent conclusion across the two projects since | 15:02 |
| tbarron | there is really nothing manila-specific or cinder-specific about what the api should look like for this | 15:03 |
| tommylikehu | tbarron: in cinder this change will only affect the filter and list APIs | 15:03 |
| tbarron | tommylikehu: I thought in manila it was only going to affect list apis? | 15:04 |
| * tbarron may not be up-to-date | 15:04 | |
| tommylikehu | haha, my point is based on the implementation | 15:04 |
| tbarron | I know the sqlalchemy details are different in the two projects, but why wouldn't we have a consistent REST api? | 15:05 |
| tommylikehu | tbarron: if we don't affect the orignal list APIs, the new one would be a little strange for end user | 15:06 |
| tommylikehu | something like manila list name like 123? | 15:06 |
| tommylikehu | maybe I am a little misunderstanding your point, my point is we should change the list API behaviours | 15:07 |
| tbarron | my only point is that we should do it the same way in both projects at the REST api level; I'd hate to see manila insist on no overload and cinder go on and overload, or whatever. | 15:08 |
| tbarron | it's an inconsistent experience for actual cloud users for no good reason. | 15:09 |
| Zhongjun__ | tbarron: Do you want to add a flag in list API, like this "manila list --name=text --exactly=False/True" | 15:09 |
| tommylikehu | tbarron: ok, that point you always have at the begining | 15:09 |
| tbarron | Zhongjun__: I just want gouthamr to make exactly the same argument he's making in manila on the cinder spec | 15:10 |
| tbarron | Zhongjun__: and then for you and tommylikehu to work through that issue in both projects to a consistent resolution. | 15:10 |
| tbarron | Zhongjun__: I'll watch both specs and offer my opinions there, but I think those opinions aren't as important as the one I'm expressing right now: let's do it in a consistent way across the two projects unless there's a really good reason not to do so. | 15:11 |
| * tbarron can't imagine what that would be at the moment | 15:11 | |
| tommylikehu | Zhongjun__: +1 | 15:12 |
| Zhongjun__ | tbarron: We always have a consistent way in the end. | 15:12 |
| tbarron | Zhongjun__: well, maybe when you and tommylikehu work on both projects, we do. But historically | 15:13 |
| tbarron | sometimes cinder and manila have done APIs differently for no good reason. | 15:13 |
| tommylikehu | ping jprovazn | 15:17 |
| Zhongjun__ | tommylikehu, tbarron: We will do it ASAP, but two projects has many different things, such as: spec deadline | 15:17 |
| tommylikehu | one question about your user messages spec, why are you going to clear out the expired messages by administrator's command instead of clean them automatically | 15:19 |
| tommylikehu | jprovazn: : | 15:19 |
| *** gcb has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| Zhongjun__ | vponomaryov: If we don't care about another one(enhance update shares), is it ok for this spec(ensure share) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446494/. | 15:27 |
| *** chlong_ has joined #openstack-manila | 15:29 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| *** eharney_ has joined #openstack-manila | 15:35 | |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| *** eharney_ is now known as eharney | 15:39 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 15:44 | |
| jprovazn | tommylikehu, either would work, I consider manage command as a more flexible way where admin can better manage this | 15:46 |
| *** cknight has joined #openstack-manila | 15:46 | |
| *** Administrator_ has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
| *** Administrator_ has joined #openstack-manila | 15:52 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 15:55 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
| Zhongjun__ | gouthamr: hi, I respond to your inline comments, please take a look when you out of meeting. thanks in advance https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447775/9/specs/pike/add-like-filter.rst | 16:09 |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 16:12 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 16:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for infinite share https://review.openstack.org/452097 | 16:27 |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
| *** a-pugachev has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
| *** a-pugachev_ has joined #openstack-manila | 16:35 | |
| *** a-pugachev_ has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for infinite share https://review.openstack.org/452097 | 16:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila master: Add quotas per share type https://review.openstack.org/452158 | 16:38 |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 16:52 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 17:10 | |
| *** mtanino has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 17:25 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 17:32 | |
| gouthamr | zhongjun_ tommylikehu tbarron: commented on both patches... | 17:36 |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 17:53 | |
| *** cknight has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
| *** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila | 18:06 | |
| *** jprovazn has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
| *** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 18:25 | |
| *** mtanino has left #openstack-manila | 18:35 | |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 18:40 | |
| *** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 18:41 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
| *** Zhongjun__ has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 18:53 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 18:58 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 18:59 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 19:02 | |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 19:03 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-manila | 19:35 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 19:55 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 19:56 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
| *** porrua_ has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 20:13 | |
| *** xyang1 has joined #openstack-manila | 20:13 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 20:18 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 20:22 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 20:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/manila-specs master: Add spec for user messages https://review.openstack.org/434277 | 20:27 |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 20:28 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
| *** dmellado has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
| *** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 20:51 | |
| *** xyang1 has quit IRC | 21:00 | |
| *** xyang1 has joined #openstack-manila | 21:00 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| *** chlong_ has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 21:13 | |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 21:19 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 21:21 | |
| *** kaisers has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| *** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 21:53 | |
| *** xyang_ has quit IRC | 22:23 | |
| *** dgonzalez has quit IRC | 22:24 | |
| *** ganso has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
| *** xyang1 has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
| *** dgonzalez has joined #openstack-manila | 22:28 | |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
| *** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 22:31 | |
| *** kaisers has joined #openstack-manila | 22:37 | |
| *** cknight has joined #openstack-manila | 23:14 | |
| *** erlon has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** cknight has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 23:30 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
| tommylikehu | Ping gouthamr from my cellphone | 23:44 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: pong | 23:44 |
| tommylikehu | I think there is a little difference between cinder and manila on like filter | 23:45 |
| tommylikehu | If cinder is finally combined the like filter spec and generilaze filter spec | 23:46 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: that would be good, however, things that can be searched with field like will still be limited. | 23:46 |
| gouthamr | "field like xyz" | 23:47 |
| tommylikehu | The possible result of that is the administrator will have the ability to decide which one is a filter and which one is a like filter | 23:47 |
| gouthamr | why not allow both variants to be present? | 23:47 |
| gouthamr | name=xyz, name_like=xyz | 23:48 |
| tommylikehu | I reckon it's a little strange | 23:48 |
| tommylikehu | Do you know any other projects have this behaviour as yoi said | 23:48 |
| *** cknight has joined #openstack-manila | 23:48 | |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: related q: have you seen searchlight's API (in turn, elastic search API)? | 23:49 |
| tommylikehu | I mean the peoject which using this searchlight | 23:49 |
| tommylikehu | I havn't used searchlight | 23:50 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: name_regex was proposed to ironic as zhongjun noted, i tried looking for it in implementation: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266688/ | 23:50 |
| tommylikehu | yes? | 23:51 |
| tommylikehu | Ok | 23:51 |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: me neither, but i've used elastic search REST API, and this here: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/search/ it seems to be built on top of it | 23:52 |
| tommylikehu | And we have nova and karbor which doesn't act in this way | 23:52 |
| tommylikehu | So which one should we choose | 23:52 |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 23:54 | |
| gouthamr | tommylikehu: i'm for clear separation between exact and non-exact (contains, does not contain etc.) querying.... it seems semantically easier to consume without confusion | 23:58 |
| tommylikehu | querying from inside the projects or outside? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!