| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila | 00:22 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 00:27 | |
| *** mtanino_ has joined #openstack-manila | 00:27 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 00:27 | |
| *** mtanino has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 00:32 | |
| *** akshai_ has joined #openstack-manila | 00:40 | |
| *** akshai has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
| *** huyang has joined #openstack-manila | 01:02 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-manila | 01:23 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 01:28 | |
| *** jasonsb has quit IRC | 01:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | liucheng proposed openstack/manila: Huawei: Create share from snapshot support in Huawei driver https://review.openstack.org/259917 | 01:33 |
|---|---|---|
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 02:03 | |
| *** mtanino_ has quit IRC | 02:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila: QoS support for Huawei Driver https://review.openstack.org/265694 | 02:06 |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 02:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila: QoS support for Huawei Driver https://review.openstack.org/265694 | 02:11 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-manila | 02:22 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-manila | 02:26 | |
| *** houming has joined #openstack-manila | 02:43 | |
| *** jasonsb has joined #openstack-manila | 03:31 | |
| *** martyturner has joined #openstack-manila | 03:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila: QoS support for Huawei Driver https://review.openstack.org/265694 | 03:41 |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 03:44 | |
| *** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-manila | 03:46 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 03:49 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 04:05 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | yapeng Yang proposed openstack/manila: Modify the environment variable about venv_path venv_dir in run_test.sh https://review.openstack.org/269425 | 04:18 |
| openstackgerrit | xing-yang proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: CLI for manage/unmanage snapshot https://review.openstack.org/249544 | 04:25 |
| *** rraja|afk has quit IRC | 04:40 | |
| *** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-manila | 04:44 | |
| *** martyturner has quit IRC | 04:45 | |
| *** akshai_ has quit IRC | 04:51 | |
| *** rraja has joined #openstack-manila | 04:57 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 04:59 | |
| *** jasonsb has quit IRC | 05:04 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila | 05:05 | |
| *** gouthamr_ has quit IRC | 05:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | xing-yang proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: CLI for manage/unmanage snapshot https://review.openstack.org/249544 | 05:20 |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 05:22 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-manila | 05:26 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
| *** yangyapeng has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** jasonsb has joined #openstack-manila | 05:38 | |
| *** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-manila | 05:42 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 06:21 | |
| *** 6A4ABP35J has joined #openstack-manila | 06:24 | |
| *** nkrinner has joined #openstack-manila | 06:45 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 06:48 | |
| *** binean_ has joined #openstack-manila | 06:56 | |
| *** binean_ has left #openstack-manila | 06:57 | |
| *** tingwang has joined #openstack-manila | 06:57 | |
| yangyapeng | HI.https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269425/ | 07:05 |
| yangyapeng | huawei dirver has a mistake? | 07:06 |
| yangyapeng | run_test.sh -p has a mistake | 07:06 |
| *** 6A4ABP35J has quit IRC | 07:09 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila | 07:09 | |
| huyang | @yangyapeng, Valeriy has already report the bug (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269047/). | 07:14 |
| yangyapeng | huyang: ok thanks, | 07:15 |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 07:23 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 07:27 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila | 07:36 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 07:50 | |
| *** yangyapeng has quit IRC | 07:57 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 08:06 | |
| *** tingwang has quit IRC | 08:13 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 08:22 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 08:26 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
| *** liewegas has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
| *** liewegas has joined #openstack-manila | 08:42 | |
| *** shausy has joined #openstack-manila | 08:47 | |
| jvarlamova | tbarron: You can configure devstack as usual, but you have to set "SHARE_DRIVER=manila.share.drivers.lvm.LVMShareDriver" in your local.conf (or localrc). | 09:29 |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 09:40 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 09:43 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila | 09:43 | |
| *** shausy has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
| *** shausy has joined #openstack-manila | 09:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Fix release of resources created by Tempest https://review.openstack.org/269529 | 10:04 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Fix release of resources created by Tempest https://review.openstack.org/269529 | 10:06 |
| *** tpsilva has joined #openstack-manila | 10:13 | |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 10:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Julia Varlamova proposed openstack/manila-ui: Add share instances to manila-ui https://review.openstack.org/260554 | 10:23 |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 10:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | NidhiMittalHada proposed openstack/manila: wait for access-rule() is reqd. in tempest-client https://review.openstack.org/268068 | 10:28 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: ping | 10:48 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: pong | 10:48 |
| *** sombrafam has joined #openstack-manila | 10:49 | |
| ganso | vponomaryov: Hello! tpsilva and I are working on update_access() patch | 10:49 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: we found a problem in the design | 10:49 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: and would like your opinion | 10:49 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: what problem? | 10:50 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245126/12/manila/share/api.py LN 804 | 10:50 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: for the following scenario: 1. add one rule, 2. (driver is busy adding rule), 3. user adds another rule | 10:51 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: the API rejects the 2nd rule | 10:51 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: the rule is added to the database | 10:51 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: but it is not processed by driver | 10:51 |
| vponomaryov | why rejects? | 10:52 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: and when 1st rule is done processing, it changes instance access_status to active | 10:52 |
| vponomaryov | it will reject only whendata the same | 10:52 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: currently it rejects because of condition if share_instance['access_rules_status'] != constants.STATUS_ACTIVE | 10:52 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: so the first rule is added and changes the status to out_of_sync | 10:53 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: then the second rule is added to the database, but is not processed, because of that condition | 10:54 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: the bug is: the status is changed back to active when the first rule finishes processing, status is changed to active, but 2nd rule is not added | 10:54 |
| *** tingwang has joined #openstack-manila | 10:54 | |
| ganso | vponomaryov: so tpsilva and I changed the condition to "== constants.STATUS_ERROR" | 10:54 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: it partially fixes the problem | 10:55 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: now driver processes all requests | 10:55 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: partially? | 10:55 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: but if we have 3 concurrent requests, the first one to finish changes instance access_rule status to ACTIVE | 10:56 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: while the others are still in progress, so status should still be out_of_sync | 10:56 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: and there is no way of verifying that without an access rule status, which has been removed in the design | 10:56 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: so, since we apply all of existing rules at once and report status for all of them, then we should wait while transitional status is going and try another update after it finishes | 10:59 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: status should not be in logic | 10:59 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: it should be result | 10:59 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: the result | 11:00 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: new rule - trigger | 11:00 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: of update | 11:00 |
| *** erlon has joined #openstack-manila | 11:00 | |
| vponomaryov | ganso: update can be started only after finish of previous update | 11:00 |
| tpsilva | so we don't have 2 updates running at the same time? | 11:01 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva: no, it is the design - apply all rules at once | 11:01 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva: new logic should have mechanism that will get know do we have list of rules update or not | 11:02 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: if that is the case, then should block any concurrent requests, like how it is doing now, and always have 2 updates per request? | 11:02 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva: and call driver update if yes | 11:02 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: like, first update finishes, and then it runs update again? | 11:02 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: if we add a transition status like "updating" | 11:02 |
| vponomaryov | one update at a time | 11:02 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: so we need to fail the request if any of the share instances are out of sync? | 11:05 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: so, status active, 1 rule is added, status changed to out of sync, driver starts processing, status changed to updating, new rule is added, status changed to out of sync, 1st rule processing is complete, checks if status is updating or out of sync, if it is updating, change to active, if it is out of sync, run update again because there are new | 11:05 |
| ganso | rules | 11:05 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva, ganso: API request should be failed only on duplicated rule | 11:05 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva, ganso: in all other cases - accept and trigger update | 11:06 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: currently it is failing if status is out of sync to prevent concurrent requests | 11:06 |
| vponomaryov | schedule it | 11:06 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva, ganso: also, how do you handle now access rules with different type? | 11:10 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva, ganso: Ip and USER, for example? | 11:10 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva, ganso: when some of them is not supported? | 11:10 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: drivers throws exception, manager updates instance access_rules_status to ERROR | 11:11 |
| ganso | s/drivers/driver | 11:12 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: but we expect OK for one of them and error for second | 11:12 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: if both gets error then it is bug of design | 11:12 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: the latest requests sets status | 11:12 |
| ganso | s/requests/request | 11:13 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: in this design, the error is for the instance | 11:13 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: the last request will change the instance access_rules_status to error | 11:13 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: having both - supoorted and unsupported type - error is consistent state? | 11:13 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: I was talking to tpsilva earlier that removing individual access rules status adds some problems, such as the one you mentioned, and the ability to track if there are rules not yet processed | 11:14 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: should not be | 11:14 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: but it would need another allow_access operation to clear out the status | 11:15 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: which does not look nice :( | 11:15 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva, ganso: so, here is proposal - need to have status per access type | 11:15 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva, ganso: per access type and share instance, not only share instance | 11:15 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: in fact, shouldn't the user remove the rule that causes error? | 11:16 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: like, if driver only supports IP, and there is one user rule, every time update_access() is called, it will throw an error | 11:16 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: such action should not break existing OK things | 11:17 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: until rule is removed | 11:17 |
| *** jcsp has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
| tpsilva | ganso: but there is no way of detecting which rule caused the error | 11:17 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: the problem is, the user will not know which rule broke | 11:17 |
| ganso | tpsilva: exactly | 11:17 |
| vponomaryov | that is why status shoudl be tracked based on access type in addition to share instance | 11:18 |
| ganso | vponomaryov, tpsilva: but still, driver processes all the rules in a single_request, update_access() | 11:18 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: driver still won't be able to tell manager which rule broke... | 11:18 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: manager provides driver with all rules, and driver throws an exception that does not tell which rule broke | 11:19 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: you described current approach | 11:20 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: how does it contradict proposal? | 11:20 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: this change is exactly about update of approach | 11:20 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: proposal is to add access type status, but how can I set that status? will it be separate update_access() calls for different access types? | 11:21 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: if so, yes | 11:21 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: that would work | 11:21 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: 2 separate update_access() calls then? | 11:22 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: looks like yes | 11:22 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: update_access for each access type, not two | 11:22 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: yes, sure | 11:23 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: and if driver wants it can apply all at once | 11:23 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: I don't think that's a good idea | 11:23 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: wouldn't it be better to add status for each rule? | 11:24 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: if we provide the driver with that possibility, and the driver fails, it will still be able to throw only one exception | 11:24 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: it is up-to-the driver how exactly to udpate rules | 11:24 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: exception or not - status should be updated | 11:25 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: but then which status? if you provide both access type rules at the same time, we will not be able to know which one failed and which one we should update the status | 11:26 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: I think it is better to have update_access() separate per status so we can set the access type status accordingly | 11:26 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: some driver will be able to update only all at once | 11:27 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: we should provide ALL at once | 11:27 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: humm... | 11:27 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: just expect update of status for all rule types | 11:27 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: I get it, the driver would end up overriding the access rules of the previous calls | 11:27 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: :( | 11:27 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: also, I wonder, why we make only one status for all rules? We can keep rules as were and update all at once in driver | 11:29 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: need just change manager approach | 11:30 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: but not DB | 11:30 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: I agree with you... it was Igor's design to remove individual access rule status... | 11:30 |
| vponomaryov | ganso: then, I guess, we should discuss it | 11:30 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: adding back the access rule status would solve all the problems | 11:31 |
| ganso | tpsilva: not all of them | 11:31 |
| ganso | tpsilva: you fix the first problem, you can know when a rule is "new" and "committed" | 11:32 |
| ganso | tpsilva: in fact, "new" and "processed", because you cannot know if it was successfully applied or not | 11:33 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: I think Igor's design to remove the status relates to the fact that you are applying all rules "atomically" now | 11:34 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: so this "atomic" operation either succeeds or fails | 11:34 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: we discussed this in Tokyo, that if a rule in the list was wrong, the list should be fixed | 11:35 |
| *** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 11:37 | |
| *** shausy has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
| *** tingwang has quit IRC | 11:41 | |
| ganso | vponomaryov: if you call driver's update_access() providing 11 access rules, where 1 is USER type, and driver does not support USER, it will throw exception saying "USER type not supported". Although it does not say that rule #7 was the one that caused the problem, isn't it enough to tell the tenant what's wrong? | 11:42 |
| ganso | vponomaryov: currently, it a tenant tries to add a single access rule, and type is not supported, the error message is what tells the user the problem. The status error is not enough to tell him if the rule was not successfully added because it was not supported or because it failed. | 11:44 |
| *** merooney has joined #openstack-manila | 11:55 | |
| *** tingwang has joined #openstack-manila | 11:59 | |
| *** timcl has joined #openstack-manila | 12:17 | |
| *** sombrafam has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
| *** rraja has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 12:39 | |
| openstackgerrit | Julia Varlamova proposed openstack/manila: Implement update_access() method in generic driver https://review.openstack.org/256281 | 12:40 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Fix backwards compatibility for v1 API imports https://review.openstack.org/269603 | 12:41 |
| *** houming has quit IRC | 12:50 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
| *** tingwang has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 13:06 | |
| *** lpetrut1 has joined #openstack-manila | 13:11 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
| *** lpetrut1 is now known as lpetrut | 13:11 | |
| *** alejandrito has joined #openstack-manila | 13:14 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 13:18 | |
| *** ekarlso has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
| *** ekarlso has joined #openstack-manila | 13:18 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/puppet-manila: Use puppet-openstack_spec_helper for Rakefile & spec_helper_acceptance https://review.openstack.org/269088 | 13:31 |
| tbarron | jvarlamova: thanks, I will try it out. | 13:37 |
| *** tingwang has joined #openstack-manila | 13:43 | |
| *** timcl has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila | 13:51 | |
| *** porrua has joined #openstack-manila | 13:54 | |
| *** cknight has joined #openstack-manila | 14:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | ting wang proposed openstack/manila: Using dict.items() is better than six.iteritems(dict) https://review.openstack.org/268866 | 14:03 |
| openstackgerrit | Julia Varlamova proposed openstack/manila: Add LVM driver https://review.openstack.org/232970 | 14:05 |
| *** akshai has joined #openstack-manila | 14:10 | |
| *** dustins has joined #openstack-manila | 14:16 | |
| *** akerr has joined #openstack-manila | 14:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | ting wang proposed openstack/manila: Using dict.items() is better than six.iteritems(dict) https://review.openstack.org/268866 | 14:22 |
| *** martyturner has joined #openstack-manila | 14:29 | |
| *** dcain has joined #openstack-manila | 14:39 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 14:44 | |
| *** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Akshai proposed openstack/manila: Fix wrong share instance db getter method https://review.openstack.org/269681 | 14:46 |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 14:49 | |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 14:54 | |
| *** akshai has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
| *** rkhanbikov has joined #openstack-manila | 15:00 | |
| *** akshai has joined #openstack-manila | 15:00 | |
| *** nkrinner has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-ui: Fix compatibility with Manilaclient and Horizon https://review.openstack.org/269698 | 15:05 |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 15:05 | |
| mkoderer | bswartz: btw.. I am currently adding Manila support for OpenStack Kolla https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/enable-manila-containers | 15:06 |
| mkoderer | bswartz: I already got the inital docker image merged with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268978/ | 15:07 |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 15:13 | |
| *** timcl has joined #openstack-manila | 15:13 | |
| openstackgerrit | Julia Varlamova proposed openstack/manila-ui: Add share instances to manila-ui https://review.openstack.org/260554 | 15:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Fix release of resources created by Tempest https://review.openstack.org/269529 | 15:30 |
| *** akshai has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Fix release of resources created by Tempest https://review.openstack.org/269529 | 15:32 |
| *** gouthamr_ has quit IRC | 15:42 | |
| *** akshai has joined #openstack-manila | 15:45 | |
| *** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila | 15:46 | |
| *** nkrinner has joined #openstack-manila | 15:50 | |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
| *** Yogi1 has joined #openstack-manila | 15:51 | |
| *** houming has joined #openstack-manila | 15:58 | |
| *** dcain1 has joined #openstack-manila | 16:01 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 16:02 | |
| *** dcain has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nanke_Liu (lnk) proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Remove openstack-common.conf https://review.openstack.org/264649 | 16:05 |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 16:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tiago Pasqualini da Silva proposed openstack/manila: Add update_access() method to driver interface https://review.openstack.org/245126 | 16:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-image-elements: Update system hosts file to understand local domainnames https://review.openstack.org/269734 | 16:12 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-image-elements: Update system hosts file to understand local domainnames https://review.openstack.org/269734 | 16:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-image-elements: Update system hosts file to understand local domainnames https://review.openstack.org/269734 | 16:21 |
| *** Yogi1 has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
| *** dcain1 has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** dcain has joined #openstack-manila | 16:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tiago Pasqualini da Silva proposed openstack/manila: Add update_access() method to driver interface https://review.openstack.org/245126 | 16:30 |
| *** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila | 16:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-image-elements: Set bash as default shell https://review.openstack.org/269753 | 16:38 |
| *** alejandrito has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| *** tingwang has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| *** akerr_ has joined #openstack-manila | 16:45 | |
| *** akerr has quit IRC | 16:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/manila: Remove unused server_get() method https://review.openstack.org/269758 | 16:47 |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| *** nkrinner has quit IRC | 16:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-image-elements: Install vim text editor https://review.openstack.org/269766 | 16:54 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** houming has quit IRC | 16:59 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-manila | 17:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/manila: service instance: also recognize instance name https://review.openstack.org/269777 | 17:13 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: ping | 17:15 |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 17:16 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 17:20 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 17:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | Akshai proposed openstack/manila: Fix wrong share instance db getter method https://review.openstack.org/269681 | 17:22 |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 17:29 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| *** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-manila | 17:33 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 17:33 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/manila: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/268458 | 17:35 |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva: pong | 17:42 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: jvarlamova is working on the generic driver update_access patch? I thought she wasn't but I saw that she fixed some of the reviews today | 17:42 |
| *** akerr_ has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** zhongjun2 has joined #openstack-manila | 17:43 | |
| *** zhongjun has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** martyturner has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** akerr has joined #openstack-manila | 17:45 | |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva: I see, you were not in-sync together | 17:47 |
| vponomaryov | tpsilva: but anyway, you can continue work , I am not Julia will have time to continue work on it | 17:48 |
| vponomaryov | I am not sure | 17:48 |
| vponomaryov | that Julia will have time* | 17:48 |
| * gouthamr_ things vponomaryov made a joke around the 'in-sync' thing with the patchset in context | 17:49 | |
| gouthamr_ | s/things/thinks | 17:49 |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 17:49 | |
| vponomaryov | gouthamr_ : you suffer from replication nightmares ? )) | 17:49 |
| *** martyturner has joined #openstack-manila | 17:49 | |
| gouthamr_ | vponomaryov : somedays.. haha :P | 17:50 |
| tpsilva | vponomaryov: okay, thank you! | 17:50 |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 18:01 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-manila | 18:10 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-manila | 18:11 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 18:14 | |
| openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila-image-elements: Fix name of CI script https://review.openstack.org/269798 | 18:19 |
| *** rhefner has quit IRC | 18:34 | |
| *** rhefner has joined #openstack-manila | 18:35 | |
| *** zhongjun has joined #openstack-manila | 18:44 | |
| *** zhongjun2 has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
| *** martyturner has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| *** martyturner has joined #openstack-manila | 18:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila: Return appropriate data on share create https://review.openstack.org/269812 | 18:56 |
| *** gouthamr_ has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 19:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tiago Pasqualini da Silva proposed openstack/manila: Hitachi HNAS driver refactoring https://review.openstack.org/263869 | 19:09 |
| *** absubram has joined #openstack-manila | 19:31 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-manila | 19:42 | |
| *** lpabon_ has joined #openstack-manila | 19:43 | |
| *** lpabon_ has quit IRC | 19:46 | |
| *** lpabon has quit IRC | 19:46 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-manila | 19:46 | |
| *** lpabon has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-manila | 19:47 | |
| *** lpabon_ has joined #openstack-manila | 19:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tiago Pasqualini da Silva proposed openstack/manila: Add update_access() method to driver interface https://review.openstack.org/245126 | 19:50 |
| *** lpabon_ has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 19:52 | |
| *** lpabon has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-manila | 19:53 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/manila: Fix usage of standlone_network_plugin https://review.openstack.org/268071 | 19:55 |
| *** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| *** vbellur has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
| *** dcain has quit IRC | 20:31 | |
| *** dcain has joined #openstack-manila | 20:35 | |
| *** xyang1 has joined #openstack-manila | 20:39 | |
| *** dcain has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
| *** dcain has joined #openstack-manila | 20:41 | |
| *** dcain has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
| *** dcain has joined #openstack-manila | 20:46 | |
| *** dcain has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
| *** jasonsb has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
| *** dcain has joined #openstack-manila | 21:08 | |
| *** merooney has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 21:18 | |
| *** akerr has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** timcl has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
| *** porrua has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
| *** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila | 21:37 | |
| *** jasonsb has joined #openstack-manila | 21:38 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 21:42 | |
| *** jasonsb has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| *** cknight has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ben Swartzlander proposed openstack/manila: Add LVM driver https://review.openstack.org/232970 | 21:45 |
| *** tpsilva has quit IRC | 21:46 | |
| *** fthiagogv has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
| *** alejandrito has joined #openstack-manila | 22:05 | |
| *** dustins has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
| *** akshai has quit IRC | 22:24 | |
| *** martyturner has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
| *** akshai has joined #openstack-manila | 22:35 | |
| *** merooney has joined #openstack-manila | 22:45 | |
| *** rkhanbikov has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
| *** alejandrito has quit IRC | 22:51 | |
| sedwards | question, when I open tempest test files like "test_consistency_group_actions.py" in PyCharm I see that in the imports "unresolved reference 'tempest'". Is that supposed to happen? I didn't see tempest listed as a requirement in requirements.txt or test-requirements.txt | 22:57 |
| *** dcain has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
| *** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila | 23:19 | |
| *** a_ta has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
| *** absubram has quit IRC | 23:25 | |
| sedwards | to put it another way, why is tempest-lib not in Manila's test-requirements.txt | 23:30 |
| *** xyang1 has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
| *** bill_az has joined #openstack-manila | 23:38 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!