| johnsom | I'm going to keep plugging forward while you take a look | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| *** dayou_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:01 | |
| rm_work | kk | 00:02 |
| rm_work | yeah debugging this, i wrote a test | 00:02 |
| rm_work | it might be called 'rules'? | 00:03 |
| rm_work | because we're dumb | 00:03 |
| rm_work | i forget | 00:03 |
| johnsom | I think I have it as l7rules in the patch I pushed | 00:04 |
| rm_work | errrrr does pool type even return l7policies? | 00:05 |
| rm_work | i think listeners do? | 00:05 |
| johnsom | It's all in the models.py now | 00:05 |
| rm_work | yeah nm i see what you mean | 00:07 |
| rm_work | johnsom: got it i think? | 00:16 |
| rm_work | you were not using dots | 00:16 |
| rm_work | i said use dots :P | 00:16 |
| johnsom | So use this? joinedload(models.Pool.l7policies).joinedload(models.L7Policy.l7rules) | 00:16 |
| rm_work | sec | 00:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: DNM: example pool l7policy->rule load https://review.openstack.org/603527 | 00:17 |
| rm_work | ^^ that | 00:17 |
| rm_work | just shoved it on the end, will abandon when you roll it in | 00:17 |
| rm_work | assuming it's what you want | 00:17 |
| johnsom | Let me try | 00:17 |
| rm_work | it works | 00:17 |
| rm_work | it's just, does the query it makes go fast enough for you | 00:17 |
| rm_work | i attached a test | 00:18 |
| rm_work | possibly it's not in the right place, but it works for debugging this | 00:18 |
| rm_work | you need rules AND listener | 00:18 |
| rm_work | because of how we do a thing | 00:18 |
| rm_work | though ... uhh | 00:18 |
| rm_work | hold on, maybe can fix that | 00:18 |
| rm_work | we might be doing something dumb | 00:19 |
| rm_work | nah i think we need that | 00:20 |
| johnsom | Yeah, that seems to work | 00:20 |
| rm_work | is the query faster? | 00:20 |
| johnsom | Well, there is a margin of error on "faster", but I can see it's not pounding the DB like the lazyload was, so win in my book | 00:21 |
| johnsom | real 0m2.242s | 00:21 |
| johnsom | rm_work Thanks! | 00:25 |
| rm_work | sweet :P | 00:25 |
| * rm_work successfully pretended to be a SQLAlchemy expert | 00:25 | |
| rm_work | the *second* you think you're good, i'll get the pipeline running to deploy that to my staging env | 00:37 |
| rm_work | hoping to have it in prod by thursday :P | 00:37 |
| johnsom | I have l7policy and l7rule left | 00:37 |
| rm_work | kk | 00:37 |
| johnsom | Going to make the spouse grumpy and finish tonight | 00:37 |
| rm_work | T_T | 00:37 |
| rm_work | tell her I appreciate it too! and I will have to bring some good booze if I ever get down there for smoked meats :P | 00:38 |
| * rm_work will see if he can get through sapd1's patch now | 00:38 | |
| johnsom | Hmm, fun, get to figure out why we have a custom l7policy get_all | 00:38 |
| rm_work | <_< | 00:39 |
| johnsom | Ah, ordered list | 00:40 |
| johnsom | ok, I can work with this | 00:40 |
| rm_work | sapd1: reviewed, a few things need fixing I think | 00:52 |
| rm_work | but it's close | 00:52 |
| abaindur | How often is amphora base image updated? | 01:03 |
| abaindur | is it tied to OS releases, or is there a separate release notes page for it? | 01:04 |
| abaindur | We are wondering when and how often to rbuild the amphora disk image | 01:04 |
| johnsom | abaindur Our code in the image is pretty stable and the release notes will point out when it needs to be built for an upgrade. Other than that, it's how often you want to pull in the distro patches. | 01:05 |
| rm_work | abaindur: for reference, i rebuild the image every time i deploy any new code to the controllers | 01:08 |
| johnsom | Assuming of course that you haven't enabled patching in your amp image locally | 01:08 |
| rm_work | which is about once every month or so | 01:08 |
| johnsom | rm_work amp list left (forgot about it) | 01:09 |
| rm_work | k | 01:11 |
| rm_work | is that one so bad? lol | 01:11 |
| johnsom | Before: real 0m30.995s | 01:12 |
| rm_work | ugh | 01:13 |
| *** abaindur has quit IRC | 01:13 | |
| rm_work | ok :P | 01:13 |
| johnsom | after: real 0m1.698s | 01:14 |
| johnsom | Ha, it even output the right data..... ( have been checking each one before/after ) | 01:17 |
| johnsom | rm_work: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134681.html | 01:21 |
| johnsom | Renaming AZs... Thus the push for "cached" in the field | 01:21 |
| rm_work | :P | 01:22 |
| rm_work | well, they solved the problem ;) | 01:22 |
| rm_work | can't rename an AZ with an instance | 01:23 |
| rm_work | huzzah | 01:23 |
| rm_work | we're safe anyway :P | 01:23 |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia master: Fix the API list performance regression https://review.openstack.org/603242 | 01:26 |
| johnsom | rm_work ^^^^ Should be fully functional | 01:27 |
| johnsom | I haven't checked the coverage report yet, but pep8,py27,functional all pass | 01:27 |
| johnsom | Ok, I think I will let that cook in zuul and will start back in the morning. o/ | 01:32 |
| bzhao__ | rm_work: Hi, you send me a message in local time 3:03AM.. Now I'm in office. ;-) | 01:33 |
| rm_work | bzhao__: hah ok yeah, sorry | 01:36 |
| rm_work | was hoping you could answer some questions about some code, but i figured it out | 01:36 |
| rm_work | bzhao__: did a little bit of refactoring on the UDP status stuff, if you want to verify that it will work for you: https://review.openstack.org/603490 | 01:37 |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:37 | |
| rm_work | just simplified a bit of that, which was causing some issues on different platforms for me (due to the way different platforms expanded ipv6 for some reason) | 01:37 |
| sapd1 | rm_work: I will fix it | 01:38 |
| rm_work | sapd1: cool, i'll check out your revisions tomorrow if i have time :) | 01:39 |
| bzhao__ | rm_work: never mind.. Yeah, looking . | 01:39 |
| bzhao__ | rm_work: OK, sorry about not very familiar with the lib. I will test it today, hard to verify through just looking . ;-). I will leave a comment in that patch. | 01:50 |
| rm_work | yeah, it's a little difficult to verify by looking, correct :P | 01:50 |
| rm_work | and I don't have a good setup to functionally test UDP stuff | 01:50 |
| bzhao__ | haha. ;-) | 01:50 |
| rm_work | so I was hoping you could do that | 01:50 |
| rm_work | and make sure it doesn't break you | 01:50 |
| bzhao__ | OK. I will do that. | 01:51 |
| bzhao__ | Thanks very much for the refactoring. | 01:51 |
| rm_work | no worries, mostly i just want the tests to be reliable cross-platform | 01:52 |
| rm_work | and hopefully the new code is a little easier for someone to maintain | 01:52 |
| rm_work | johnsom: deploying your patch to staging soon :) | 01:53 |
| openstackgerrit | sapd proposed openstack/octavia master: Support REDIRECT_PREFIX action for L7Policy https://review.openstack.org/601086 | 01:54 |
| sapd1 | rm_work: I posted a comment for your question about jinja template generate. | 02:00 |
| rm_work | k | 02:00 |
| rm_work | i think i understood actually when i got further | 02:00 |
| sapd1 | rm_work: Are you running octavia for production? :D | 02:00 |
| rm_work | yes :) | 02:01 |
| rm_work | usually try to run a few patches ahead of master | 02:01 |
| rm_work | but i'm like three months behind in my deployment due to other issues | 02:01 |
| rm_work | about to be caught up again | 02:01 |
| sapd1 | rm_work: The next issue I got is change VIP QOS of the load balancer. | 02:03 |
| *** sapd1_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:04 | |
| rm_work | yeah ok it just looked weird because the further indented stuff was first | 02:04 |
| rm_work | strange, but i think i get it | 02:04 |
| rm_work | lol so close | 02:05 |
| rm_work | last comment | 02:05 |
| rm_work | and then prolly +2 | 02:05 |
| rm_work | hmmm though i would also really like to see a test for it in octavia-tempest-plugin | 02:06 |
| rm_work | with a depends-on to this patch so we can see it working | 02:06 |
| rm_work | hmmm though i didn't add SSL stuff to that yet so it'll be difficult i guess | 02:06 |
| rm_work | i think this is fine | 02:07 |
| sapd1_ | rm_work: I have run it in production now. :D | 02:07 |
| *** sapd1 has quit IRC | 02:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | sapd proposed openstack/octavia master: Support REDIRECT_PREFIX action for L7Policy https://review.openstack.org/601086 | 02:07 |
| rm_work | ah, an api-test would be good -- https://github.com/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/blob/master/octavia_tempest_plugin/tests/api/v2/test_l7policy.py | 02:07 |
| rm_work | but i think i'm +2 anyway | 02:08 |
| rm_work | but, an API test is in your best interest, that way it doesn't break on you in the future :P | 02:08 |
| sapd1_ | yes. I think so | 02:08 |
| rm_work | can basically just clone one of the one for like, redirect_url | 02:09 |
| rm_work | *the one for | 02:09 |
| sapd1_ | exactly | 02:09 |
| sapd1_ | But I'm considering about add more option for that such as redirect with status code. | 02:09 |
| bzhao__ | sapd1_: 301? | 02:11 |
| bzhao__ | sapd1_: Is that the cases we discussed in a few weeks before ？ ；-） | 02:12 |
| sapd1_ | I don't remember. But I think I have to research about some status code when redirect to each case. 301 or 302 | 02:14 |
| rm_work | permanent or temporary redirect | 02:16 |
| rm_work | i forget which one we decided to use behind the scenes, but i know some people would prefer the other one, or at least a choice :P | 02:16 |
| bzhao__ | I mean this one https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003609 , I raise this RFE in PTG, so our LB team agree to add the prefix option and http status code for fit that case. And right now, we default support the 302 redirection, so maybe introduce 301 or more status codes for different http versions. ;-) | 02:16 |
| bzhao__ | I remember we discuss and load the configration details before PTG. ;-)' | 02:17 |
| bzhao__ | rm_work: yeah. ;-) | 02:18 |
| sapd1_ | bzhao__: Yes. I remember now. | 02:19 |
| johnsom | rm_work: Sure co-author.... | 02:22 |
| rm_work | what? :P | 02:40 |
| openstackgerrit | sapd proposed openstack/octavia master: Support REDIRECT_PREFIX action for L7Policy https://review.openstack.org/601086 | 02:40 |
| rm_work | ah heh | 02:40 |
| rm_work | didn't notice you added me | 02:41 |
| rm_work | deploying... | 02:44 |
| rm_work | deployed | 02:47 |
| rm_work | testing :P | 02:47 |
| *** ramishra has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:08 | |
| *** cgoncalves|pto has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
| *** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:17 | |
| sapd1_ | good | 03:30 |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:07 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 05:06 | |
| *** reedipb has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:11 | |
| reedipb | johnsom, xgerman_ , rm_work : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/599393/ if you get some time | 05:12 |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 05:30 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:30 | |
| *** luksky11 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:51 | |
| sapd1_ | rm_work: I don't know this test failed. http://logs.openstack.org/86/601086/9/check/octavia-v2-dsvm-scenario-centos-7/df59df0/ara-report/reports/4c285bb3-6865-46bc-918a-54f28391fe8f.html | 05:55 |
| sapd1_ | *why | 05:55 |
| rm_work | sapd1_: not your problem | 06:00 |
| rm_work | yum repo failed to fetch | 06:00 |
| rm_work | just wait for recheck | 06:01 |
| sapd1_ | I have just rechecked. Maybe need one more recheck | 06:01 |
| *** rcernin_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:04 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 06:06 | |
| *** ccamposr has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:21 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:34 | |
| *** rcernin_ has quit IRC | 06:36 | |
| *** phuoc_ has quit IRC | 07:02 | |
| *** celebdor has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:04 | |
| *** phuoc has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:04 | |
| *** celebdor has quit IRC | 07:05 | |
| *** celebdor has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:05 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: WIP: Failover test https://review.openstack.org/501559 | 07:07 |
| rm_work | sapd1_: possibly something broke in one of the main centos repos and that test is just failing for everything <_< | 07:21 |
| sapd1_ | rm_work: Ok. I'm waiting :D | 07:23 |
| rm_work | prolly someone will have to figure it out tomorrow | 07:23 |
| rm_work | like, someone that isn't us | 07:24 |
| rm_work | guessing it's an upstream breakage | 07:24 |
| sapd1_ | rm_work: Where do you live? It's midnight now? | 07:25 |
| rm_work | yeah | 07:25 |
| *** blake has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:38 | |
| *** Emine has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:06 | |
| *** blake has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
| *** luksky11 has quit IRC | 08:39 | |
| *** salmankhan has joined #openstack-lbaas | 09:06 | |
| *** luksky11 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 09:09 | |
| *** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:14 | |
| maciejjozefczyk | hey! I have little question. To achieve Active-Passive Octavia loadbalancer the only way of doing that for now is to use vrrp + keepalived inside amphora? | 11:16 |
| *** celebdor has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
| *** celebdor has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:46 | |
| *** reedipb has quit IRC | 12:56 | |
| *** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| *** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:46 | |
| *** sapd1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:52 | |
| xgerman_ | maciejjozefczyk: Yes | 14:14 |
| *** salmankhan1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:24 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
| *** salmankhan1 is now known as salmankhan | 14:26 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 14:34 | |
| *** salmankhan has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:34 | |
| *** salmankhan1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:35 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
| *** salmankhan1 is now known as salmankhan | 14:38 | |
| *** dayou_ has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
| *** salmankhan has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:50 | |
| *** Emine has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
| *** luksky11 has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| *** salmankhan1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:26 | |
| *** salmankhan1 has quit IRC | 15:27 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:47 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
| *** salmankhan has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:01 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:26 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** ramishra has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:11 | |
| rm_work | maciejjozefczyk: technically i have a driver that does it via FLIPs at L3 | 17:19 |
| rm_work | but it's not really for public consumption unless you know what you're doing (though it is pushed up as a review) | 17:19 |
| xgerman_ | would still be keeplaived + vrrp — juts not ARP | 17:26 |
| *** ccamposr has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
| rm_work | yeah true lol | 17:30 |
| openstackgerrit | German Eichberger proposed openstack/octavia master: Updates the operator docs with the new lb failover command https://review.openstack.org/603463 | 17:33 |
| sapd1 | maybe zuul is dead today :D | 17:36 |
| johnsom | Yeah, bit of a backlog today | 17:37 |
| openstackgerrit | German Eichberger proposed openstack/octavia master: Updates the operator docs with the new lb failover command https://review.openstack.org/603463 | 17:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/603317 | 17:46 |
| *** sapd1 has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
| *** evgenyf has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: Fix test_with_ipv6 = False failure https://review.openstack.org/598405 | 18:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: Update links in README.rst https://review.openstack.org/575030 | 18:48 |
| *** celebdor has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
| *** salmankhan has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:51 | |
| *** evgenyf has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
| johnsom | #startmeeting Octavia | 20:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Sep 19 20:00:04 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 20:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 20:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Octavia)" | 20:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' | 20:00 |
| johnsom | Hi folks! | 20:00 |
| xgerman_ | O/ | 20:00 |
| rm_work | o/ | 20:00 |
| johnsom | #topic Announcements | 20:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: Octavia)" | 20:00 | |
| johnsom | Might be a light meeting as I know some folks are on vacation (again, grin) | 20:00 |
| johnsom | Your lowly PTL took notes during the PTG, please see the etherpad | 20:01 |
| johnsom | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/octavia-stein-ptg | 20:01 |
| johnsom | Also TC elections have started, so check your e-mail for a ballot | 20:01 |
| xgerman_ | Is the vacation a Redhat or Europe thing? | 20:01 |
| johnsom | I think it's a Europe thing, but I don't know. | 20:02 |
| johnsom | Certainly not a "johnsom" thing sadly | 20:02 |
| johnsom | His vacation was the PTG... lol | 20:02 |
| xgerman_ | nor xgerman | 20:02 |
| nmagnezi | O/ | 20:02 |
| johnsom | There is also an email about the zuul backlog today. Summary is one of the providers is doing upgrades, so the pool of instances is lower than normal. | 20:03 |
| johnsom | Any other announcements today? | 20:03 |
| johnsom | Ah, we did cut a stable/Pike release this week as well. | 20:04 |
| johnsom | #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review | 20:04 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Brief progress reports / bugs needing review (Meeting topic: Octavia)" | 20:04 | |
| xgerman_ | Yep, promoted cgoncalves to release manager!! | 20:04 |
| johnsom | Ha, yeah, cgoncalves is now empowered to cut releases. Hopefully he can help get stable releases out at a better pace than I did in Rocky | 20:05 |
| johnsom | Well, other than taking notes at the PTG I focused on fixing the Octavia v2 API "list" performance regression that a few folks have mentioned. | 20:06 |
| johnsom | #link https://review.openstack.org/603242 | 20:06 |
| johnsom | Other than a release note I think this is good to go. | 20:06 |
| johnsom | It dropped an LB list from 2:30 to a few seconds on my test setup. | 20:07 |
| johnsom | This is a backport candidate too IMO | 20:07 |
| xgerman_ | I have been looking into the AAP driver and see if I can implement one of our self-healing ideas (octavia shadow port) | 20:07 |
| johnsom | I have some gate work to address, then likely will start on the IPv6 Act/Stdby bug. | 20:07 |
| johnsom | nmagnezi I think I will need to do something similar to what you started here: | 20:08 |
| johnsom | #link https://review.openstack.org/589292 | 20:08 |
| johnsom | Mind if I expand on that for the IPv6 fix? | 20:08 |
| nmagnezi | johnsom, sure. But I have been putting out internal fires so had to shift my focus :< last I check that didn't actually work for me but I do plan to get back to this | 20:09 |
| johnsom | nmagnezi Ok, I may pick up that patch and run with it for the IPv6 patch. I think they are related. | 20:10 |
| johnsom | Also, evgenyf from Radware added a few stories to the agenda looking for feedback: | 20:10 |
| johnsom | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003738 | 20:10 |
| johnsom | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003737 | 20:11 |
| johnsom | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003733 | 20:11 |
| johnsom | If you have time, please provide feedback on those. (I haven't yet, sigh) | 20:11 |
| johnsom | Ah, they look like potential provider driver related bugs. I will have to dig into those | 20:12 |
| johnsom | Any other updates? | 20:12 |
| johnsom | I saw there was a fix to the neutron-lbaas namespace driver memory leak, so that is cool | 20:13 |
| johnsom | Ok, moving on | 20:14 |
| johnsom | #topic Talk about VIP security groups | 20:14 |
| nmagnezi | Yes, Carlos submitted that while I was away so still looking at it | 20:14 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Talk about VIP security groups (Meeting topic: Octavia)" | 20:14 | |
| nmagnezi | But looks good | 20:14 |
| nmagnezi | :) | 20:14 |
| johnsom | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602564/ | 20:14 |
| johnsom | This patch was proposed and discussed a bit earlier in the week in the IRC channel | 20:14 |
| johnsom | It is proposing moving the VIP security group into the tenant project so they can change it to only allow certain source IPs | 20:15 |
| johnsom | I added this to the agenda to raise awareness and open the floor to discussion on it. | 20:15 |
| xgerman_ | this has been a long standing ask and some tools (gopher cloud) hacked soemthing to make that happen to some degree | 20:15 |
| johnsom | Personally I'm not in favor as we already see bad things happening once we added the VIP port to the tenant. | 20:16 |
| johnsom | Mostly from runaway "cleanup" scripts users write that delete anything in their projects. | 20:16 |
| xgerman_ | Yeah, some people think tenants will own their bad decisions but in relaity they just blame Octavia | 20:16 |
| johnsom | Right, and raise support calls | 20:17 |
| johnsom | At the PTG we discussed folks researching options for "stacking" SGs on a port. Did anyone get time to look at this? | 20:17 |
| xgerman_ | Sorry, got side tracked… | 20:18 |
| xgerman_ | well, they own te port so they can stack whatever they want ;-) | 20:18 |
| johnsom | Yeah, I haven't either. Just got caught up on e-mail today. | 20:18 |
| johnsom | Yeah, my understanding for the discussion was that the SG on the VIP doesn't actually impact traffic, that it is only the "VRRP" or base port that matters. The tenant doesn't own that port | 20:19 |
| xgerman_ | mmh, really depends on how the rules are implemented (e.g. if they are ip based) | 20:20 |
| johnsom | Ok, maybe we should table this until next week. | 20:20 |
| xgerman_ | I know they resolve remote ports to its but not sure about local ones | 20:21 |
| xgerman_ | its=ips | 20:21 |
| xgerman_ | johnsom: +1 | 20:21 |
| johnsom | Other ideas were: accepting an SG and stacking it via the Octavia worker. Adding an ACL API to the LB. | 20:21 |
| xgerman_ | or giving them control of SG and using FWaaS for our stuff | 20:21 |
| johnsom | Yeah, FWaaS was another proposal | 20:22 |
| johnsom | Ok, tabling for next week for more research time | 20:22 |
| johnsom | #topic Storyboard meeting to discuss "priority" metadata | 20:22 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Storyboard meeting to discuss "priority" metadata (Meeting topic: Octavia)" | 20:22 | |
| johnsom | nmagnezi I met with the storyboard folks last week. | 20:23 |
| * nmagnezi listens | 20:23 | |
| johnsom | I thanked them for some of the enhancements they have provided. | 20:23 |
| johnsom | I also raised the "we should have a priority/severity" metadata field. | 20:23 |
| johnsom | Which of course I got back "you are doing it wrong". | 20:24 |
| nmagnezi | They proposed we simply use tags? | 20:24 |
| johnsom | So, if you folks would like to have a discussion with the storyboard team about this, I offered to setup a meeting time (via the dev mailing list) where we can have an IRC discussion about this topic. | 20:24 |
| johnsom | Why it is needed, how it would be used, etc. | 20:25 |
| johnsom | nmagnezi are you guys interested in that and willing to provide the details for a larger discussion on the topic? | 20:25 |
| johnsom | We could do IRC or just start an e-mail list chain | 20:26 |
| nmagnezi | sure, I'll follow up on that. Can't we simply discuss this as an agenda item in their weekly meeting? | 20:26 |
| johnsom | I think you folks workflow is the driver for the discussion, so kind of want you on point if we are doing it | 20:26 |
| johnsom | We could, but we want to announce on the mailing list the time so we could get bigger participation | 20:27 |
| nmagnezi | ack. | 20:27 |
| nmagnezi | We have some PTOs next week, but I'll follow up on that. I can possibly join the discussion from my PTO anyways | 20:28 |
| johnsom | Ok, we can do it the week after, no rush | 20:28 |
| nmagnezi | Even better | 20:28 |
| johnsom | Ok | 20:28 |
| johnsom | #topic Open Discussion | 20:28 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Octavia)" | 20:28 | |
| nmagnezi | Is there any preferred day for you? (In case you would want to participate) | 20:28 |
| johnsom | Any other topics for today? | 20:28 |
| johnsom | Ok then, thanks folks! Have a great week going forward! | 20:31 |
| johnsom | #endmeeting | 20:31 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack PTG etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/octavia-stein-ptg" | 20:31 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Sep 19 20:31:21 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 20:31 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/octavia/2018/octavia.2018-09-19-20.00.html | 20:31 |
| xgerman_ | O/ | 20:31 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/octavia/2018/octavia.2018-09-19-20.00.txt | 20:31 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/octavia/2018/octavia.2018-09-19-20.00.log.html | 20:31 |
| nmagnezi | o/ | 20:31 |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia master: Fix the API list performance regression https://review.openstack.org/603242 | 21:02 |
| johnsom | Added a release note | 21:03 |
| rm_work | cool | 21:03 |
| rm_work | working for me in staging | 21:04 |
| rm_work | going to prod with it tomorrow | 21:04 |
| rm_work | feel free to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558962/ | 21:04 |
| rm_work | even has a releasenote :) | 21:04 |
| *** salmankhan has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
| johnsom | Ok | 22:12 |
| johnsom | Ah | 22:12 |
| johnsom | AZ rolled | 22:12 |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/octavia master: Updates the operator docs with the new lb failover command https://review.openstack.org/603463 | 23:23 |
| rm_work | johnsom: lol, i wish this patch was nearly as funny as a rickroll, but alas | 23:25 |
| rm_work | holy dieties, the gate queues... worse than i expected | 23:25 |
| rm_work | deities? yeah that's the spelling | 23:25 |
| johnsom | Yeah, you know it's bad when they send out an e-mail about it | 23:26 |
| johnsom | stable periodic jobs have been waiting 17 hours | 23:26 |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia-dashboard master: Add Python 3.6 unit test jobs https://review.openstack.org/603931 | 23:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard master: Add Python 3.6 unit test jobs https://review.openstack.org/603932 | 23:44 |
| rm_work | i see post-merge jobs at 19h | 23:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!