*** tongl has quit IRC | 00:12 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:14 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
*** korean101 has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:24 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 00:35 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:42 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 00:47 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:51 | |
rm_work | i'm seeing it with default config johnsom | 00:52 |
---|---|---|
rm_work | so probably for ME, it's just a deployment option I need to figure out | 00:52 |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 00:56 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:56 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:00 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 01:04 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:06 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:09 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 01:14 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:18 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:18 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:19 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 01:23 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:24 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:27 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 01:32 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 01:32 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:32 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:41 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:44 | |
*** ssmith has quit IRC | 01:44 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:45 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:47 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:49 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:52 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:54 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:10 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:13 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:13 | |
*** JudeC has quit IRC | 02:19 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:22 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:34 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:36 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:40 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:41 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:52 | |
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:33 | |
*** dougwig has quit IRC | 03:43 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 04:18 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:20 | |
*** chlong_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:20 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 04:25 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:29 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:30 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:34 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 04:34 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:38 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:47 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:56 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:59 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 05:01 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:05 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 05:10 | |
*** chlong_ has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:29 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 05:33 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 05:36 | |
*** Alex_Staf has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:55 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:59 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:05 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:09 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 06:23 | |
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:27 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:36 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 06:41 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:45 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 06:51 | |
*** kobis has quit IRC | 07:10 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:13 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:16 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 07:17 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:19 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:21 | |
*** Alex_Staf has quit IRC | 07:22 | |
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:22 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 07:25 | |
*** Alex_Staf has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:51 | |
*** sanfern has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
*** bzhao has joined #openstack-lbaas | 09:55 | |
*** diltram has quit IRC | 10:23 | |
*** diltram has joined #openstack-lbaas | 10:27 | |
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:19 | |
*** atoth has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:37 | |
*** dougwig has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:53 | |
nmagnezi | rm_work, o/ | 12:03 |
*** chlong_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:16 | |
openstackgerrit | Nir Magnezi proposed openstack/octavia master: Remove key_path from devstack plugin https://review.openstack.org/485593 | 12:31 |
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:36 | |
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:05 | |
*** sanfern has quit IRC | 13:31 | |
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:31 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:39 | |
*** chlong_ has quit IRC | 13:40 | |
*** ssmith has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:44 | |
*** cpusmith has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:45 | |
*** ssmith has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
*** cpusmith_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:00 | |
*** cpusmith has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
*** cpusmith_ has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
*** ssmith has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:15 | |
*** cpusmith has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:21 | |
*** pksingh has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:23 | |
*** ssmith has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:33 | |
*** Alex_Staf has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** pksingh has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:37 | |
*** pksingh has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:45 | |
*** bbzhao has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:48 | |
*** bzhao has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:54 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:57 | |
*** chlong_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:57 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
*** leitan has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:03 | |
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 15:27 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:29 | |
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:44 | |
*** kobis has quit IRC | 15:49 | |
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:50 | |
*** kobis has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
*** pksingh has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
*** diltram has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
*** diltram has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:08 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:10 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 16:18 | |
*** chlong_ has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:22 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 16:23 | |
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:29 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:30 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:33 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 16:34 | |
*** pksingh has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:35 | |
*** sshank has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:48 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:57 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
*** dayou has quit IRC | 17:07 | |
*** tongl has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:12 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:18 | |
*** dayou has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:20 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:23 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
*** krypto has quit IRC | 17:28 | |
johnsom | sanfern Hi | 17:32 |
*** chlong_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:32 | |
sanfern | hi | 17:35 |
xgerman_ | johnsom are we still using the neutron_lbaasv2 owned port to hold the IP and then make our own ports? | 17:37 |
johnsom | Yeah, I think the port "owner" field is listed as something like lbaasv2 | 17:38 |
xgerman_ | yep, that port is down for us and we don;t see traffic | 17:38 |
johnsom | Well, for VIP there are two ports. One is the "fake" allowed address pairs port, the other is the base port. One is "up" on is "down" normally | 17:39 |
johnsom | The "vip address" port will be be "DOWN" with device owner "Octavia", the "base address" will be UP with compute:nova as owner per my devstack | 17:44 |
rm_work | rofl http://i.imgur.com/4vLJIjO.png | 17:46 |
rm_work | with gunicorn it's one full round of requests every 5 minutes | 17:46 |
rm_work | something is funky | 17:47 |
rm_work | every 5 minutes SOMETHING happens | 17:47 |
johnsom | So it's not the wsgi platform.... | 17:49 |
rm_work | well | 17:51 |
rm_work | it's very different with gunicorn | 17:51 |
rm_work | from uwsgi | 17:51 |
rm_work | so it kinda *is* the wsgi platform? | 17:51 |
rm_work | ah it's not just one set of requests, seems to be everything for ~15 seconds every 5 min | 17:53 |
rm_work | 23 requests this run... which means it doesn't line up exactly with the number of threads | 17:53 |
tomtomtom | hello, I have some behavior with my network in octavia I don't understand.... I have lb_network_name set to networkA and amp_boot_network_list set to networkA in octavia.conf, then I *openstack loadbalancer create --name https-6 --vip-subnet-id Internet_Subnet* where Internet_Subnet is networkB. | 18:05 |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:06 | |
tomtomtom | The vm's in the load balancer are in networkA however the amphora netns doesn't get a networkA address and never gets "health" because of that | 18:06 |
tomtomtom | The amphora instance gets an networkA address, just not in the namespace, just as it's main eth device, what am I doing wrong here? | 18:07 |
tomtomtom | The networkB address is the only thing in the namespace, but the vm's are not in that namespace. Is this by design? | 18:08 |
*** pksingh has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
tomtomtom | another point to note is that my netns on amphora instance seems to only get one ip address that it "thinks" is the external address and then a bound address (like eth0:1) that is on the same network, so I assume that the network is supposed to be external, however, my vm's in the load balancer I think should be on another network (private hopefully) | 18:14 |
tomtomtom | so I forsee that amphora netns would need at least two networks to satisfy the health checks and the external network service. However, I am seeing that the netns is only ever getting one network interface on one network. any ideas how i might change the config to satisfy? | 18:15 |
xgerman_ | johnsom wonder where we stuffed the member up/down value on the neutron CLI | 18:17 |
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:18 | |
tomtomtom | also I'm only using v2 for octavia. | 18:19 |
*** dougwig has quit IRC | 18:24 | |
*** JudeC has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:32 | |
johnsom | xgerman_ admin_state_up or operational status? | 18:35 |
xgerman_ | oh, figured it out lbaas-loadbalancer-status | 18:35 |
johnsom | xgerman_ Under the old neutron client I think you could only get it via the status tree | 18:35 |
johnsom | Yep, I hated that so we fixed it with the OSC plugin | 18:36 |
xgerman_ | nope, it returns a status tree | 18:36 |
*** kobis has quit IRC | 18:36 | |
xgerman_ | oh, ok, that;s better then | 18:36 |
johnsom | Yeah, with OSC that status is right on the member | 18:36 |
johnsom | tomtomtom Ok, so first question (haven't finished parsing question 2 yet), network A will never be in the network namespace, this is for security as the network namespace isolates the tenant traffic from lb-mgmt-net, etc. Health messages are sent from the amphora agent, which runs outside the network namespace(netns). | 18:39 |
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:40 | |
johnsom | Amphora agent collects health from haproxy (inside netns) via a Unix socket that HAProxy exposes and provides stats and status over. | 18:40 |
tomtomtom | ok so then I misunderstood, I thought that health checks were running through the netns? | 18:41 |
johnsom | This way the HAProxy and keepalived processes, which handle customer traffic, have no access or visibility to the management network. | 18:41 |
johnsom | tomtomtom Maybe I should clarify which health checks..... | 18:41 |
johnsom | We have a few due to the reliability features of Octavia..... | 18:41 |
johnsom | So, health monitoring of backend member servers happens from inside the network namespace and are done via HAProxy. | 18:42 |
johnsom | We also have a health heartbeat that the amphora-agent sends up to the health manager processes over the lb-mgmt-net | 18:43 |
tomtomtom | ok and so there's the issue.... my backend members are on the networkA network | 18:43 |
johnsom | Health heartbeat is used to detect if HAProxy is failing in some way or that amphora itself is failed | 18:43 |
johnsom | tomtomtom ok, so that is fine. | 18:43 |
johnsom | So your VIP network, specified at LB create time is network A, then your member network, specified at member create time is also network A. This will work just fine. The network namespace with only have one interface in it, network A. | 18:45 |
johnsom | HAProxy health monitoring will have a source IP of your VIP in that case | 18:46 |
*** rtjure has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
*** rtjure has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:47 | |
johnsom | You have what is typically called a one-armed load balancer | 18:47 |
tomtomtom | no networkB would be the external network. | 18:48 |
tomtomtom | networkA would be the internal | 18:48 |
johnsom | Oh, crumb, did I get those mixed up while typing??? | 18:48 |
johnsom | So your VIP network, specified at LB create time is network B, then your member network, specified at member create time is also network B. This will work just fine. The network namespace with only have one interface in it, network B. | 18:49 |
johnsom | The two IPs you see for the network B interface inside the netns is for the allowed-address-pairs. It's part of how we do HA. | 18:50 |
*** kobis has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
johnsom | One IP is the VIP IP, this will move between amphora in failover scenarios (to maintain the IP end users hit). | 18:51 |
johnsom | The other is the base network IP, this does not move to other amphora. It is just DHCP or assigned by neutron. | 18:52 |
tomtomtom | hmmm.... I would think that having my members and my lb in the external network would be a security no-no. there's no way to keep my members and load balancers in separate networks? | 18:52 |
johnsom | You have lost me | 18:52 |
tomtomtom | you know vm's in a private network and LB in an external network? | 18:53 |
johnsom | Ok, let me give it a go again. | 18:53 |
johnsom | In a simple two armed octavia LB there are three networks involved. Network A (lb-mgmt-net), Network B (VIP network), Network C (member network). | 18:54 |
johnsom | Network A is a private network between amphora agents and the controllers. No outside routing (though you can route inside if needed). Controllers send command and control over it, amphora-agents send health heartbeats back. | 18:55 |
johnsom | Network B, This is the network that has the IP address users connect to the load balancer on. That IP is the VIP address. It only has interfaces on the amphora inside the netns to isolate tenant traffic. Network B could be a private tenant network or an external network. You specify that at LB creation time. | 18:57 |
tomtomtom | then how do these networks get defined in octavia.conf? I have the lb_network_name set to networkA which is amphora communication then attached networks are networkB and networkC(the member network) ? Would that be correct? | 18:58 |
johnsom | Network C, This is the network your member servers live on, typically a web server. This network only has an interface inside the netns. Network C is typically a tenant private network, but could be external is odd cases. | 18:58 |
johnsom | amp_boot_network_list in octavia.conf specifies the lb-mgmt-net, network A in my description. | 18:59 |
johnsom | None of the others are specified in the octavia.conf. You specify them when you create the LB or member via CLI or API | 19:00 |
tomtomtom | ok I see | 19:00 |
johnsom | In the one armed case, when you specify the same network at LB create AND member create, since they are the same network it only has one interface in the netns | 19:01 |
tomtomtom | ok so then networkB is the member network and the LB vip network? | 19:03 |
johnsom | Right, one armed, since the user specified the same for both, only Network B is plugged into the amp and netns. | 19:04 |
rm_work | tomtomtom: lb_network_name doesn't exist BTW | 19:05 |
*** sshank has quit IRC | 19:06 | |
johnsom | Customers would connect to Network B IP address (VIP) and members would see connections from the LB from the Network B address. | 19:06 |
johnsom | rm_work +1 | 19:06 |
rm_work | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465183/ | 19:06 |
rm_work | tomtomtom: just ... remove that from your config entirely | 19:06 |
rm_work | should have had a reno note for that :( | 19:07 |
tomtomtom | so under [networking] lb_network_name is not supposed to be there? | 19:07 |
rm_work | right | 19:07 |
johnsom | rm_work Still can! | 19:07 |
rm_work | it's completely not relevant | 19:07 |
rm_work | it has NEVER been read | 19:07 |
rm_work | it was simply misleading T_T | 19:07 |
johnsom | Yeah, it evidently didn't get removed when someone changed it to boot_network | 19:07 |
tomtomtom | so then if I specify lb create "external" network and then member create "internal" network then somehow they will be able to talk to each other? | 19:10 |
johnsom | No, they can't talk to each other, but you will have a network interface for each network inside the netns | 19:11 |
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:12 | |
tomtomtom | ok so that's the part that doesn't happen, only the external network work (vip) ever gets created inside the netns. | 19:12 |
johnsom | In that case, customer connections to the VIP will come over network B to the VIP IP, then haproxy will connect to members over network C with the IP address assigned to the network C interface. | 19:12 |
johnsom | No error? | 19:13 |
johnsom | I.e. the member doesn't have provisioning status of ERROR and the API/CLI didn't return an error? | 19:14 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/483371 | 19:19 |
tomtomtom | netns only has eth1 (vip, networkB) on the amphora instance and then the amphora instance has one physical interface ens3(network A), if haproxy uses netns to health check the vm then it will fail because that one interface is not in the netns | 19:20 |
tomtomtom | network C interface lives where? netns? | 19:25 |
tomtomtom | ifconfig on amphora instance returns ens3 which is network C, and ip netns exec amphora-haproxy returns eth1 which is network B, haproxy complains it can't find the server on network C.... I thought the issue was that network C needed to be in the netns, but I cannot get network C and network A to exist in the netns simultaneously. | 19:28 |
tomtomtom | right member has operating status of error, but provisioning status is ok | 19:33 |
tomtomtom | or ACTIVE | 19:33 |
tomtomtom | operating status is OFFLINE | 19:33 |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:34 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
*** cpusmith has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
*** cpusmith_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:39 | |
*** cpusmith has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:40 | |
*** cpusmith_ has quit IRC | 19:44 | |
johnsom | tomtomtom the network IDs aren't lining up for me, how about some output: | 19:48 |
johnsom | 1. nova show the amphora instance | 19:48 |
johnsom | 2. ip a from inside the amp | 19:48 |
johnsom | 3. ip from inside the netns | 19:48 |
tomtomtom | | Cloud-Public network | (internal network) | | Internet-Public network | networkB (external network) | 19:56 |
tomtomtom | 2. network A (10.20.x.x) - vm instance also on network A (10.20.x.x) | 19:56 |
*** openstack has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:01 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:01 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** sshank has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:10 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:11 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:15 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 20:17 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:20 | |
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:22 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:29 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** gcheresh has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:47 | |
*** cpusmith has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 20:52 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:56 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
*** leitan has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
*** diltram has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
*** chlong_ has quit IRC | 21:16 | |
*** diltram has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:18 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:34 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
*** ssmith has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:41 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:43 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:53 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:57 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
*** sshank has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:13 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:22 | |
*** sshank has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:23 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 22:27 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 22:27 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:31 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:40 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 22:45 | |
*** ipsecguy has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:49 | |
*** ipsecguy has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:52 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:59 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:01 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:04 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/neutron-lbaas master: fixed health monitor setting during tempest test, https://review.openstack.org/480233 | 23:04 |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/octavia master: Remove key_path from devstack plugin https://review.openstack.org/485593 | 23:15 |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:17 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
*** csomerville has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:26 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:35 | |
*** aojea has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** sshank has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
*** oomichi has quit IRC | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!