Wednesday, 2017-03-22

openstackgerritAnkur proposed openstack/octavia master: Fix v2 LB API return for null description and name  https://review.openstack.org/44831700:31
*** reedip has quit IRC00:38
*** armax has quit IRC00:41
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas00:42
openstackgerritMichael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia master: Adds v2 load balancer API section  https://review.openstack.org/43875701:07
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas01:09
*** sanfern has quit IRC01:19
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas01:24
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas01:33
*** nrado has quit IRC01:34
openstackgerritAnkur proposed openstack/python-octaviaclient master: Add skeleton to python-octaviaclient  https://review.openstack.org/44833101:43
openstackgerritShashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for pools  https://review.openstack.org/40592202:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Use assertIsNone(...) instead of assertEqual(None, ...)  https://review.openstack.org/44686102:13
*** krypto has quit IRC02:15
openstackgerritAnkur proposed openstack/python-octaviaclient master: Add skeleton to python-octaviaclient  https://review.openstack.org/44833102:20
*** Other-krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas02:26
*** Other-krypto has quit IRC02:33
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/44697002:34
*** reedip has quit IRC02:52
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas02:55
*** yuanying has quit IRC03:05
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas03:12
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas03:34
*** harlowja has quit IRC03:35
*** links has quit IRC03:38
*** faizy has quit IRC03:39
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas03:52
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-lbaas04:18
*** links has quit IRC04:33
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas04:44
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas04:50
*** blogan has quit IRC04:58
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas04:59
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas05:09
*** rcernin has quit IRC05:09
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas05:19
*** faizy has quit IRC05:22
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas05:22
*** faizy_ has joined #openstack-lbaas05:23
*** faizy_ has quit IRC05:27
*** faizy_ has joined #openstack-lbaas05:27
*** faizy has quit IRC05:27
*** faizy_ has quit IRC05:30
*** faizy_ has joined #openstack-lbaas05:31
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas05:55
*** reedip has quit IRC06:06
*** faizy_ has quit IRC06:07
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas06:08
*** krypto has quit IRC06:09
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas06:10
*** faizy has quit IRC06:11
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas06:11
*** reedip has quit IRC06:12
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas06:13
*** faizy has quit IRC06:15
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas06:15
*** faizy has quit IRC06:18
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas06:19
*** faizy has quit IRC06:21
*** faizy has joined #openstack-lbaas06:22
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas06:23
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas06:42
*** aojea has quit IRC06:56
*** armax has quit IRC07:05
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas07:05
*** zioproto has joined #openstack-lbaas07:15
*** reedip has quit IRC07:16
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas07:16
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:30
*** reedip has quit IRC07:31
*** reedip__ has quit IRC07:34
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:34
*** reedip__ has quit IRC07:37
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:37
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-lbaas07:39
*** reedip__ has quit IRC07:43
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:43
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas07:43
*** reedip__ has quit IRC07:44
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:44
*** ducnc has quit IRC07:45
*** reedip__ has quit IRC07:54
*** faizy has quit IRC07:54
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-lbaas07:55
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:56
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas08:16
*** aojea has quit IRC08:16
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas08:17
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas08:20
*** sanfern has quit IRC08:25
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas08:26
*** reedip__ has quit IRC08:32
*** eezhova has quit IRC08:41
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas09:17
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas09:17
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas09:20
*** yuanying has quit IRC09:31
*** reedip__ has quit IRC09:33
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas09:33
*** gongysh has quit IRC09:36
*** reedip__ has quit IRC09:37
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas09:37
*** reedip__ has quit IRC09:47
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas09:47
*** aojea_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:05
*** aojea has quit IRC10:08
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-lbaas10:11
*** reedip__ has quit IRC10:19
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:46
*** sanfern has quit IRC10:54
*** krypto has quit IRC11:12
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas11:16
*** krypto has quit IRC11:35
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas11:38
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas11:38
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas11:49
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas11:50
reedip__o/12:32
rm_worko/12:32
reedip__dont u sleep rm_work ???12:32
reedip__:)12:32
rm_worksometimes12:33
rm_worknot recently12:33
reedip__:)12:33
*** reedip__ has quit IRC12:36
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas12:38
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas12:42
rm_workshould it be possible to PUT a listener with no body? >_>12:44
rm_workthat would not do anything...12:44
rm_workI think it should be mandatory to have a PUT body?12:44
nmagnezireedip, I already checked that. rm_work never sleeps :)12:46
rm_workah, expect_errors is being used improperly in a lot of these tests, i think12:54
*** belharar has joined #openstack-lbaas12:58
*** krypto has quit IRC13:05
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas13:05
*** krypto has quit IRC13:05
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas13:05
*** belharar has quit IRC13:17
*** belharar has joined #openstack-lbaas13:22
*** belharar has quit IRC13:29
*** gongysh has quit IRC13:35
*** krypto has quit IRC13:42
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas13:42
reedipanyone has an idea how to implement quotas for a resource ?13:50
reedipI have defined the cfg options , used registry_helper in neutron.quota and registered plural mappings13:51
rm_workerr13:55
rm_workneutron_lbaas or octavia?13:55
reediperr ... a different module, but knowledge is common :D13:58
rm_workwell14:00
rm_workit depends on how the project implements quotas, I think :P14:00
rm_workI know how to do it in Octavia, but no idea in neutron-lbaas T_T14:00
*** zioproto has quit IRC14:01
*** oomichi has quit IRC14:04
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas14:04
reedipso quotas can be implemented differently ?14:05
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-lbaas14:06
*** krypto has quit IRC14:07
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas14:07
rm_worki mean, each project has some implementation I think14:09
rm_workI don't think there's an oslo.quotas or anything14:09
reediphmm14:10
*** zioproto has joined #openstack-lbaas14:11
*** chlong has quit IRC14:12
*** krypto has quit IRC14:13
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas14:13
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas14:13
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas14:13
johnsomrm_work empty put is 400 in my book.  Though I am not sure if you can just use ?name=foo as a replacement...14:17
rm_workhmmm14:17
rm_workwell, i'll post a patchset in a sec14:18
rm_workand see what you think14:18
rm_workI don't want to make it MANDATORY in the type14:18
rm_workbecause that interferes with other stuff i think14:18
rm_workjohnsom: so in v1, test_update_listeners_same_port has: self.skip('This test should pass with a validation layer.')14:19
rm_workjohnsom: in v2, should we be aiming to include this validation layer as part of these initial patches? or not?14:19
johnsomreedip Every project does quota differently.  I looked for a code to borrow, but ultimately kept is simple and did our own thing.  Neutron uses reservations for example.  We use DB transactions14:19
*** links has quit IRC14:21
johnsomrm_work I told them it can be a second pass.  We aren't doing the project/policy checking yet either.  The only validation now is the type / required stuff wsme brings14:22
johnsomThough if we have the cycles I am not opposed to adding validation as we go14:23
reedipjohnsom : okay ... so there is no defined method ...14:23
johnsomreedip nope.  There was discussions of an oslo project, but it didn't go anywhere.  They are talking about moving the limits into keystone now, but just limit storage14:24
reedipjohnsom okay .... thanks14:24
johnsomrm_work I prioritized getting the bones of the API in place first, then building on those14:25
*** belharar has joined #openstack-lbaas14:25
rm_workkk14:25
rm_workposting an update to the listeners patch14:29
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Octavia v2 API for listeners  https://review.openstack.org/42474414:29
rm_workjohnsom: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424744/26/octavia/api/v2/controllers/listener.py14:32
rm_workjohnsom: line 210-21414:32
johnsomYeah, hmm, I wonder if we could do that in a validation hook and centralize it.14:35
johnsomSo that would catch a body with a root tag but no content14:35
rm_workin this case, there's not even a root tag14:37
rm_workthe tests were passing in {}14:37
rm_workso listener_.listener was an Unset type14:37
rm_workwhere it'd try to do the to_dict14:37
rm_workjohnsom: so yeah we need to be careful about expect_errors=True in requests14:40
rm_workin the testing14:40
rm_workit is masking a lot of errors14:40
reedipsindhu : working on the HM patch?14:40
sindhureedip: nope, u take it over14:41
rm_workummm, why does listener Create allow you to pass in an id at all? >_<14:41
reedipsindhu : sure?14:41
rm_workok, so this is really ridiculous, our docs are so bad that even we can't tell what our API is supposed to do14:42
reediprm_work  : lol14:42
rm_workand our API has some really dumb stuff in it, that I honestly can't figure out why we did it14:43
rm_workso it either wasn't in the spec and was an implementation mistake14:43
johnsomrm_work it should not.  Yep, that is why I am rewriting them....14:43
rm_workor else we should be ashamed T_T14:43
johnsomThe current docs still have v1 stuff intermixed14:44
johnsomIt is in bad shape14:44
sindhureedip: yeah! looks like everyone is in a hurry and I don't want to block anyone. Pls go ahead14:46
rm_workgrr i have a couple test_load_balancer fixes i want to throw into this listener patch so badly...14:47
rm_workaugh14:47
rm_worki will forget...14:47
rm_workbah i'll make another trivial patch really quick14:47
*** blogan has joined #openstack-lbaas14:47
openstackgerritSindhu Devale proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for Health Monitor  https://review.openstack.org/40625614:47
rm_workoh i guess i could do them along with some enabling of stuff14:48
*** armax has quit IRC14:49
*** belharar has quit IRC14:50
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Octavia v2 API for listeners  https://review.openstack.org/42474414:56
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas14:56
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Assorted trivial fixes for v2 loadbalancer tests  https://review.openstack.org/44862614:57
rm_workah hmm14:59
*** armax has quit IRC15:01
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas15:09
reediprm_work, johnsom : jfyi , the DVR meeting is on #openstack-meeting-alt , and they were discussing about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/167234515:10
openstackLaunchpad bug 1672345 in neutron "Loadbalancer V2 ports are not serviced by DVR" [Undecided,New]15:10
johnsomYeah, I commented on that one that I think it is probably a duplicate to the on going DVR with AA ports issues15:15
rm_workoops, messed up that last commit a little15:21
rm_workpep8/py27 fails, embarassing15:21
rm_workalso embarrassing: misspelling embarrassing15:21
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Octavia v2 API for listeners  https://review.openstack.org/42474415:22
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for pools  https://review.openstack.org/40592215:22
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas15:26
*** chlong has quit IRC15:30
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas15:33
rm_workjohnsom: for member PUT:15:37
rm_workNote: You cannot update the member ID, project_id, address, protocol_port, and subnet_id attributes. If you attempt to update any of these attributes, the service returns the HTTP Immutable (422) response code.15:37
rm_workis that true?15:37
rm_workobviously you can't update the ID or project-id15:38
rm_workbut not address or protocol_port??15:38
rm_workugh and it says you can update the pool_id and member_id right below that15:39
rm_workffff15:39
johnsomYes, I think it was because you are basically doing the same as create/delete15:39
johnsomYou cannot update the IDs...15:39
johnsommember you can only update weight, name, admin_state15:40
*** krypto has quit IRC15:41
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas15:41
rm_workk15:41
johnsomFor what it is worth, I am mostly looking at the lbaas code and not the docs as up create the new docs15:41
nmagneziouch..15:44
nmagnezisounds like A LOT of work15:44
rm_workwait hold on15:49
rm_workif you update a member's name...15:49
rm_workthe expectation is that the response for the PUT *doesn't* show the new value?15:50
johnsomnmagnezi It is... Sigh.  But it will be so useful when done....15:50
johnsomnmagnezi I am up to working on the load balancer section: http://docs-draft.openstack.org/57/438757/5/check/gate-octavia-api-ref/8a25d23//api-ref/build/html/v2/index.html15:50
johnsomrm_work It probably should.  This is the whole issue with async api and roll backs.  I think in octavia I was doing some model tricks.  It's hard because updating a name is just a DB call, updating a weight means the handler gets involved and it's aysnc15:53
openstackgerritBernard Cafarelli proposed openstack/octavia master: DIB: drop some dependencies  https://review.openstack.org/44865715:53
rm_workyeah, well... k that's fine then15:53
rm_workjust making sure15:53
rm_workseems like a shitty test to try to write tho15:53
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC15:57
johnsomWe need to make sure we match neutron-lbaas behavior, it might be different than octavia v115:57
*** armax has quit IRC16:02
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for Members  https://review.openstack.org/40593216:03
*** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas16:05
rm_workjohnsom: so I know you have about 30 things, but, do you think you will have a chance to review the listeners patch today?16:05
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas16:06
*** blogan has quit IRC16:06
johnsomYes, I probably can give it a look today.  I have LB status and stats left on the LB API ref, then I am onto listener anyway.16:07
johnsomTrying to answer an ask.openstack.org question at the moment...16:13
*** blogan_ is now known as blogan16:17
*** krypto has quit IRC16:30
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas16:35
*** chlong has quit IRC16:45
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas16:49
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas16:51
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas16:52
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC16:56
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas16:58
rm_workjohnsom: wait, is it even *allowed* to provide a project_id to things like member/pool?17:01
rm_workthey *must* be the same as the LB, no?17:02
rm_workeven if you're an admin17:02
johnsomNot any more17:02
rm_workwut17:02
johnsomSee https://review.openstack.org/44286517:02
johnsomIt's the same as the LB now17:02
johnsomWe need to pull that over for the v2 api17:03
johnsomActually, not that link...17:03
johnsomThis link https://review.openstack.org/43120717:03
johnsomThe first link was where I pulled it over for  LB17:04
johnsomBut that is a special case as it is the top of the object tree17:04
rm_workyeah k17:06
*** eezhova has quit IRC17:08
rm_workok i took a stab at it on the members patch17:08
rm_workgonna need to do the same on listeners/pools I think, since i believe it was done a little differently17:08
johnsomOk, I think sindhu added it and the base class method on listener17:09
johnsomMaybe not17:09
rm_workah maybe17:10
rm_workah it's done a little differently17:11
rm_workor rather17:11
rm_workit's the same as the code in the listener.py controller for v117:11
rm_workthat you linked17:11
rm_workbut17:11
rm_workthat wouldn't allow it to be changed17:11
johnsomYou can't change it project ID for listeners under an LB, only the LB17:12
rm_workso like, if you create a pool and in the POST body you send in a project_id, that doesn't allow it17:12
rm_workok that's what I was asking17:12
rm_work[02:02:26]  <rm_work>johnsom: wait, is it even *allowed* to provide a project_id to things like member/pool?17:12
johnsomYeah, I think we have to still take it, for backward compat, but it is ignored in favor of the owning LB project_id17:12
rm_workso you *can't* provide project_id for listener/pool/member?17:12
rm_workahh ok17:12
johnsomhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/431207/3/octavia/api/v1/types/listener.py17:13
*** krypto has quit IRC17:13
rm_work>_<17:13
rm_workok17:13
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas17:13
*** krypto has quit IRC17:13
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas17:13
rm_workthen i guess the others are fine17:18
*** krypto has quit IRC17:18
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas17:19
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC17:19
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for Members  https://review.openstack.org/40593217:22
johnsomrm_work Do you know if we can put length restrictions on this?17:22
johnsominsert_headers = wtypes.wsattr(wtypes.DictType(str, str))17:22
rm_workuhh17:25
rm_worknot sure, the wstypes stuff is kinda magic to me still17:25
johnsomYeah, me too17:25
rm_workFYI though I just tested the patch chain all the way to members in my devstack, and it seems to work and generate the correct config on the amp17:25
rm_workthough i've only tested happy-path creates17:25
johnsomCool!17:25
johnsomGetting close!17:26
rm_workyeah17:26
rm_workpssst17:26
rm_workadd me to your calendar event thing for the octavia meeting :P17:26
rm_workpretty sure it is today17:26
johnsomAh, yeah, PM me the e-mail you want me to use....17:27
*** links has quit IRC17:39
*** aojea_ has quit IRC17:46
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas17:48
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas17:53
*** armax has quit IRC17:54
rm_workjohnsom: # TODO(johnsom) Remove after deprecation (R series)17:57
rm_workfor... tenant_id?17:57
johnsomboth tenant_id and project_id17:57
rm_workand what is the max_length for input_headers stuff?17:57
rm_work255?17:57
johnsomSince this is a POST we should validate the length of everything.  Yeah, we should check the DB size17:58
rm_workno reason to have max_length on the Response type, right?18:00
*** kobis has quit IRC18:00
johnsomRight, just the post/put18:00
johnsomYeah, just throw 255 in18:01
johnsomI think that is large enough18:01
johnsomI think we have some body issues with Listener18:02
johnsomI'm seeing default_tls_container_ref in nlbaas18:03
rm_workjohnsom: I am thinking maybe we can't do lengths18:06
rm_workValueError: Dictionaries key can only be a pod type18:06
johnsomrm_work those TLS questions are good ones for you to weigh in on....  Just posted some comments18:06
rm_workyeah I think that stuff is disabled until later?18:06
rm_worki saw stuff about TLS18:06
johnsomrm_work I see this: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/solum/tree/solum/api/controllers/camp/v1_1/datamodel/plans.py#n36  I think the "pod" thing is for the key, maybe we can at least limit the value?18:08
rm_workah maybe18:08
johnsomSeems, less than ideal, but...18:08
rm_workyeah ok seems correct18:09
rm_workok got it18:13
rm_workand added the listeners to it for ankur-gupta-f118:13
rm_workproposing momentarily18:13
rm_workgotta run tests18:13
ankur-gupta-f4Huzzah!18:14
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas18:15
johnsomrm_work one more simple to fix comment on connection_limit minimum18:15
rm_workk18:16
johnsomSorry, and another.  Still comparing to nlbaas code18:16
johnsomOk, that is all the comments I have for POST18:17
rm_workummm not sure what's up with the TLSTermination object18:24
rm_workbecause like18:24
rm_workwe can't take in that data18:24
rm_work...18:24
johnsomI hoped you knew....18:24
rm_workI'm removing it18:25
rm_work>_>18:25
johnsomYeah, looks like old cold from the initial API commit18:26
rm_workkk testing18:27
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas18:41
rm_workugh ok18:42
rm_worki'll have soemthing in a bit18:43
johnsomNP, I jumped back to API-REF18:43
*** sanfern has quit IRC18:49
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas18:49
*** sanfern has quit IRC18:49
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas18:50
*** sanfern has quit IRC18:50
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas18:51
*** sanfern has quit IRC18:51
eanderssonWe are looking into implementing support for an alternative monitoring port. Is this already on the roadmap? If not, should we do a blueprint for it?18:59
*** harlowja has quit IRC18:59
johnsomeandersson Yes, it is on the roadmap: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Octavia/Roadmap "Health monitoring on alternate IPs and/or ports"19:00
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas19:00
eanderssonSweet19:01
*** cpuga has joined #openstack-lbaas19:01
*** harlowja has quit IRC19:01
eanderssonIs there a blueprint for it already?19:01
johnsomNo, not yet.19:02
*** armax has quit IRC19:04
openstackgerritMichael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia master: Adds v2 load balancer API section  https://review.openstack.org/43875719:08
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC19:08
johnsomAlmost done with load balancer.  But it is lunch time....19:08
openstackgerritGerman Eichberger proposed openstack/octavia master: Initial version of the operator guide  https://review.openstack.org/44875919:11
*** cpuga has quit IRC19:17
*** eezhova has quit IRC19:22
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas19:33
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas19:41
rm_workugh19:43
rm_workthe tests19:43
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas19:45
openstackgerritGerman Eichberger proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Fix README with link to octavia launchpad page  https://review.openstack.org/44702919:46
openstackgerritGerman Eichberger proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Updating import for linux/interface opts  https://review.openstack.org/35247119:47
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Octavia v2 API for listeners  https://review.openstack.org/42474419:50
rm_workjohnsom / ankur-gupta-f1 ^^19:50
ankur-gupta-f4yup. Quickly need to rebase something then will pull it down19:51
ankur-gupta-f4thanks rm_work19:51
ankur-gupta-f4and by quickly rebase I mean like its all messed. gimme 1519:51
rm_workrofl no worries19:51
rm_worki am gonna need to hand off, have meetings and then i need to head out after19:52
ankur-gupta-f4rm_work:  okay no worries. Off top of your head what did you complete, what is left. We will tackle that first on the handoff then do the rest.19:54
rm_workgot all the comments19:55
rm_workAFAIK that should be pretty close to good, other than the testing is a little light19:55
rm_workit could use a bit more on both the units and the functional, I think19:55
johnsomOctavia meeting starting soon on #openstack-meeting-alt19:57
*** armax has quit IRC20:16
*** tesseract has quit IRC20:17
*** harlowja has quit IRC20:18
openstackgerritMerged openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Change default auth_version to v3  https://review.openstack.org/44683620:32
openstackgerritMerged openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/44697020:33
*** bzhao_ has joined #openstack-lbaas20:43
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas20:56
rm_workdoing some rebasing so I can easily grab the end of the chain for testing21:01
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for pools  https://review.openstack.org/40592221:01
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for Members  https://review.openstack.org/40593221:01
*** chlong has quit IRC21:08
openstackgerritGerman Eichberger proposed openstack/octavia master: Initial version of the operator guide  https://review.openstack.org/44875921:25
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC21:28
*** eezhova has quit IRC21:32
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas21:33
*** sshank has quit IRC21:37
*** ndahiwade has quit IRC21:37
*** dasm has quit IRC21:39
*** pcaruana has quit IRC21:47
*** sshank has joined #openstack-lbaas21:57
*** Guest3223 has joined #openstack-lbaas21:58
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia master: Change v2 API LB create return status code  https://review.openstack.org/44830722:07
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia master: Fix v2 LB API return for null description and name  https://review.openstack.org/44831722:08
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia master: Assorted trivial fixes for v2 loadbalancer tests  https://review.openstack.org/44862622:08
openstackgerritMerged openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Fix README with link to octavia launchpad page  https://review.openstack.org/44702922:09
*** fnaval has quit IRC22:28
*** eandersson has quit IRC22:51
*** sticker has quit IRC22:55
*** sticker has joined #openstack-lbaas22:55
*** bzhao_ has quit IRC22:58
*** catintheroof has quit IRC23:01
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas23:02
*** catintheroof has quit IRC23:06
*** eandersson has joined #openstack-lbaas23:15
*** krypto has quit IRC23:39
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!