Friday, 2017-03-17

*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas00:03
*** catintheroof has quit IRC00:16
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-lbaas00:35
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC00:35
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas00:37
*** amotoki has quit IRC00:41
*** blogan has joined #openstack-lbaas00:57
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas01:02
*** catintheroof has quit IRC01:02
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas01:02
*** armax has quit IRC01:13
rm_workhmm01:40
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas01:45
*** amotoki has quit IRC01:50
johnsomMorning02:00
*** zioproto has quit IRC02:01
johnsomThe Lb Api docs are WIP so, ignore for now.  Mostly dealing with unhappy git issues02:01
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: WIP: Floating IP Network Driver (spans L3s)  https://review.openstack.org/43561202:09
rm_workah, k02:10
rm_workwhat kind of unhappy git issues? :P02:10
rm_workoh, i was going to ask you ... for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444707/ were you a +2 only with voting co-gates like diltram, or would you generally agree to do that even without a co-gate?02:11
rm_workjohnsom: ^^02:11
rm_workI think we'll be better off regardless02:12
johnsomI will take a look when I get home02:12
rm_workit's the DIB-from-master thing02:12
rm_workyou +2'd, but that's with a depends-on for a co-gate, right now02:13
rm_workdiltram wants that co-gate02:13
rm_workI think we should move down this path regardless02:13
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas02:25
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas02:33
*** catintheroof has quit IRC02:36
*** sanfern has quit IRC02:39
johnsomWell, dougwig agreed and put in a bug to co-gate02:44
johnsomI think it is a good idea if we can make it happen.02:44
johnsomBut I conceded to do the master pull until you feel the pain enough to change it to g-r.02:45
johnsomThat is why I put up the +202:45
johnsomOh, novels in the dependent patch.  This should be interesting to read02:45
johnsomIan makes a good point for pinning the project and having periodic jobs for DIB master (Like we have for oslo)02:52
*** yuanying has quit IRC03:03
johnsomrm_work I would still support it, for now, without the depends-on03:20
johnsomI think we will feel the pain, but we can try it03:20
*** chlong has quit IRC03:25
*** KeithMnemonic has quit IRC03:30
*** KeithMnemonic has joined #openstack-lbaas03:30
openstackgerritJi Chengke proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Change default auth_version to v3  https://review.openstack.org/44683603:40
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas03:46
*** amotoki has quit IRC03:51
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas04:27
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas04:54
*** csomerville has quit IRC04:54
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-lbaas04:56
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-lbaas04:58
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC04:58
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas05:06
*** csomerville has quit IRC05:12
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas05:12
*** sanfern has quit IRC05:28
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas06:13
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas06:13
*** sanfern has quit IRC06:38
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC06:38
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas06:39
openstackgerritJi Chengke proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Use assertIsNone(...) instead of assertEqual(None, ...)  https://review.openstack.org/44686106:52
*** krypto has quit IRC06:53
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas06:54
*** krypto has quit IRC06:57
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas06:57
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas07:00
openstackgerritZhaoBo proposed openstack/octavia master: Support vip bandwidth limitation  https://review.openstack.org/44191207:04
*** gongysh has quit IRC07:07
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas07:10
*** basilAB_ has quit IRC07:18
*** vaishali has joined #openstack-lbaas07:23
*** basilAB has quit IRC07:23
*** basilAB has joined #openstack-lbaas07:26
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-lbaas07:34
*** reedip has quit IRC07:42
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-lbaas07:43
openstackgerritJi Chengke proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Use assertIsNone(...) instead of assertEqual(None, ...)  https://review.openstack.org/44686107:47
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas07:48
*** amotoki has quit IRC07:52
*** krypto has quit IRC07:52
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas07:52
*** krypto has quit IRC07:57
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas07:58
*** krypto has quit IRC07:58
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas07:58
*** eezhova has quit IRC08:00
*** sanfern has quit IRC08:03
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas08:04
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas08:13
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas08:13
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC08:18
*** zioproto has joined #openstack-lbaas08:18
zioprotohello08:19
zioprotohey guys, looking at https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas in the Readme the URL to where submit bugs is missing. What would be the right launchpad space ?08:19
*** krypto has quit IRC08:21
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas08:21
*** krypto has quit IRC08:21
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas08:21
*** sanfern has quit IRC08:23
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas08:23
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas08:24
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas08:34
*** kobis has quit IRC08:38
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas08:41
*** krypto has quit IRC08:50
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas08:50
*** ducnc has quit IRC08:52
*** kobis has quit IRC08:53
*** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas08:53
*** blogan has quit IRC08:56
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:57
*** reedip has quit IRC09:00
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas09:05
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas09:06
*** reedip has quit IRC09:12
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas09:26
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas09:35
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:38
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas09:38
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC09:41
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:42
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas09:48
*** voelzmo has joined #openstack-lbaas09:50
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:53
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-lbaas09:53
*** eezhova has quit IRC09:55
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas10:04
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas10:10
*** krypto has quit IRC10:33
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas10:33
*** krypto has quit IRC10:33
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas10:33
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas10:41
*** yuanying has quit IRC10:45
*** rcernin has quit IRC10:46
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas10:48
*** krypto has quit IRC10:49
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas10:54
*** gongysh has quit IRC10:56
*** nrado has joined #openstack-lbaas11:22
*** aojea_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:28
nradoHi, I tried to create a TLS listener (Haproxy driver) with Barbican. I have also added an Intermediate in my Barbican Certificate container.11:29
nradoWhen I look into the haproxy.cfg and the certificate itself on the loadbalancer I can see that the files are wrongly formatted.11:29
nradoThe intermediate has line breaks after each character. Is this normal or did I make something wrong?11:29
nradoI think this is the code which is responsible for generatign the certificate. What happens exactly in these lines:11:29
nradopem = ()11:29
nradoif tls_cert.intermediates:11:29
nrado    for c in tls_cert.intermediates:11:29
nrado    pem = pem + (c,)11:29
nrado    …11:29
nrado    return "\n".join(pem)11:29
nradoAccordingly, the SSL checker tells me that the intermediate is missing… Any idea?11:29
nradoForgot the link to the code metioned above: https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas/blob/master/neutron_lbaas/drivers/haproxy/jinja_cfg.py#L207-L22111:30
*** aojea has quit IRC11:31
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:32
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-lbaas11:40
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas11:49
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:53
*** krypto has quit IRC12:52
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas12:53
*** krypto has quit IRC12:55
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:55
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas12:55
*** krypto has quit IRC12:55
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas12:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas12:56
*** krypto has quit IRC13:00
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas13:01
*** krypto has quit IRC13:01
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas13:01
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas13:10
*** catintheroof has quit IRC13:10
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas13:10
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas13:27
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas13:29
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas13:33
*** amotoki has quit IRC13:33
*** cpuga has joined #openstack-lbaas13:45
*** diltram has quit IRC14:05
*** kobis has quit IRC14:05
*** diltram_ has joined #openstack-lbaas14:05
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas14:06
*** saju_m has quit IRC14:22
*** chlong has quit IRC14:23
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC14:26
*** gongysh has quit IRC14:39
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:43
*** blogan_ is now known as blogan14:44
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas14:45
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:50
tonygunkJust upgraded to Ocata and Octavia and having the hardest time getting things to work.  Error is "Driver error: The request you have made requires authentication."15:03
tonygunkJust looking for advice on what the heck I'm doing wrong15:04
tonygunkhttp://paste.openstack.org/raw/603147/15:04
rm_workah, hmm, it's doing v2 auth?15:05
rm_workand keystone v2 is disabled?15:05
*** sanfern has quit IRC15:06
rm_worktonygunk: the issue is going to be the auth params in neutron.conf or maybe neutron_lbaas.conf15:07
rm_worknot octavia.conf15:07
rm_workit is still in neutron-lbaas where it is doing bad auth15:07
rm_workit has not gotten to the octavia service at all15:07
*** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas15:07
johnsomtonygunk Yep, rm_work is right, neutron.conf file, [service_auth] section needs to be configured15:09
rm_workohai johnsom15:09
tonygunkWell that makes sense - because I don't have a service_auth section in there right now15:09
rm_work:)15:09
rm_workah probably it used to look in neutron_lbaas.conf and now it is neutron.conf15:10
rm_workI think we kinda merged stuff over?15:10
rm_workjohnsom: confirm? or am I crazy15:10
rm_workor both15:10
johnsomI think they are in the process of merging it into one15:10
rm_worktonygunk: i assume you have an auth section in neutron_lbaas.conf -- just move it over to neutron.conf I believe15:11
johnsomEither way, putting the section in neutron.conf should fix it up15:11
rm_workyeah, just saying he probably already HAS the section15:11
rm_workjust in the wrong config now15:11
tonygunkrm_work: thanks - I'm actually just using neutron.conf for everything - driver, service provider, etc15:11
rm_worksince it would have worked in newton15:11
rm_workhmm15:11
rm_workit would always have required a service_auth section SOMEWHERE15:12
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas15:12
rm_workso it must be there somewhere15:12
rm_workor maybe lost during the upgrade somehow? :/15:12
johnsomzioproto https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia is the right place now15:12
tonygunkyea - something must have happened..15:12
openstackgerritSaverio Proto proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Fix README with link to octavia launchpad page  https://review.openstack.org/44702915:16
zioprotojohnsom: thanks I fixed the Readme then15:17
xgermanthanks for fixing15:17
zioprotothis bug should be moved then ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/167375415:18
openstackLaunchpad bug 1673754 in neutron "LBaaSv2: Cannot delete loadbalancer in PENDING_CREATE" [Undecided,New]15:18
zioprotook I managed to do it15:18
diltram_johnsom, rm_work: I'm thinking that we should change for stable15:21
diltram_and make just periodic job to test with master15:21
*** krypto has quit IRC15:22
rm_workhmm15:26
rm_workzioproto / johnsom: but that is not a bug in octavia, only neutron-lbaas15:26
johnsomYes15:27
*** ipsecguy_ is now known as ipsecguy15:27
johnsomAll load balancing bugs are going (or have been moved) into the octavia launchpad.15:27
rm_workO_o15:27
rm_workthat's ... confusing15:27
johnsomWe don't want them going into the neutron launchpad anymore15:27
zioprotoso did I do right ?15:27
rm_worki guess so?15:28
rm_workbut it's not a bug in octavia <_< so I don't fully agree15:28
johnsomzioproto Yeah, octavia is the right project.  I deleted neutron from the project list15:28
johnsomrm_work it's certainly not a bug in neutron itself either15:28
rm_worktrue15:28
johnsomtagging with lbaas was the right thing as well15:28
*** armax has quit IRC15:32
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas15:32
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas15:32
*** krypto has quit IRC15:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas15:48
johnsomnrado I think that got fixed in Octavia but not ported to neutron-lbaas.  Can you open a bug?  Maybe reference the fix in octavia here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38002015:53
*** voelzmo has quit IRC15:53
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:56
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas16:00
nradothx johnsom. I managed to fix this problem within the code and the haproxy.pem looks fine to me now. BUT now, and this is mysterious, I got another private key besides the one I've provided at the end of the pem file… is this also a known bug? :D16:04
johnsomnrado Umm, no.16:07
*** eezhova has quit IRC16:10
*** beardedeagle has joined #openstack-lbaas16:18
*** kobis has quit IRC16:23
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas16:27
*** aojea_ has quit IRC16:28
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas16:40
openstackgerritAnkur proposed openstack/python-octaviaclient master: [WIP] Initialize plugin for OSC  https://review.openstack.org/44622317:00
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas17:01
johnsomHmm, well, this is a problem....17:04
johnsomneutron-lbaas returns 201 for LB create even though it should really be 202 since it is async17:05
johnsomoctavia is 202 both v1 and v217:05
*** dlundquist has quit IRC17:08
*** dlundquist has joined #openstack-lbaas17:09
reedipjohnsom : hi17:12
johnsomreedip Hi17:12
reedipsilly question17:12
johnsomsilly answer17:13
reedipjohnsom : I was just going through some of the OSC patches and saw one from ankur-gupta-f4 for Octavia17:13
reedipfound out that we have a new client  ( octavia client )17:13
johnsomYep, just getting started on that17:13
ankur-gupta-f4woot!17:13
reedipjohnsom : wanted to know its purpose, actually ... I mean who would be using it ?17:13
reedipif we have an OSC side implementation17:14
johnsomAnyone wanting to use a CLI to configure load balancers17:14
reedipjohnsom : and we have the OSC implementation for that :)17:14
johnsomAh, so, right now that 'python-octaviaclient' is only going to contain the OSC plugin for load balancing17:14
reedipjohnsom : not my place , maybe ... but we have a similar implementation for Tap-as-a-Service . The whole Agent-Server-Client code is in a single repo actually17:15
reedipand Neutron, OSC, everything picks up from there  johnsom17:15
johnsomreedip I think I am confused now.17:16
reedipjohnsom : if we have octaviaclient only for OSC, then should we reinvent the wheel ? or can we load most of the outgoing code of neutron-lbaas in neutronclient  onto octavia17:16
reedipankur-gupta-f4 : what do you think ....17:16
*** pcaruana has quit IRC17:18
johnsomreedip Currently the only go-forward CLI client for octavia will be the OSC plugin being developed in the 'python-octaviaclient' repo.17:18
ankur-gupta-f4because of the neutron-client and neutron-lbaas deprecation it has to be brought out to its own. Although my original point was that it should go into OSC native rather than new repo since it will take extra work to get everything up17:18
ankur-gupta-f4but it has to be done17:19
reedipjohnsom : my query is only for the purpose of octaviaclient... if we are going to provide it as a library to other modules ( like Heat, Rally etc ) then it should exist. If not, and if the client side implementation is small , should we have a separate repo ?17:19
reedipjohnsom : its the opinion and call of the lbaas-core members( should be octavoa core members now :D ) , but this is just something which I was thinking about17:20
*** krypto has quit IRC17:20
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas17:20
*** krypto has quit IRC17:20
*** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas17:20
johnsomI think the other projects would use the openstacksdk for octavia.  The separate repo is really just for the OSC plugin.  It's a separate package so folks don't have to install all of octavia just to get the CLI plugin17:20
reedipjohnsom : then as ankur-gupta-f4 stated, the same thing can be done in OSC ( one less package for Debian and RHEL to consider :) )17:21
johnsomreedip Yeah, but the OSC team is not allowing it17:21
*** krypto has quit IRC17:21
reedipohh ... didnt know that17:22
reedipjohnsom : any inputs from OSC team which you got ( I guess you discussed with dtroyer about it in the summit ? )17:23
johnsomWe met with the OSC team at the PTG and they were clear that they are not allowing projects to be in tree other than a few key projects.17:23
openstackgerritSindhu Devale proposed openstack/octavia master: DB migration to add ID column to HM  https://review.openstack.org/43045117:24
johnsomreedip yep17:24
johnsomreedip The number of packages thing is a good point.  Though I think the distros can choose to bundle them differently.  Like a single RPM/Deb with all of the plugins bundled in.17:25
reedipjohnsom : okay... though I am still skeptical about the new package , but if there is no option .. then octaviaclient sounds good17:26
johnsomreedip Feel free to poke Dean and get his perspective.17:27
reedipjohnsom : should do it quick or else too much work may go into the new repo :)17:27
johnsomYep17:27
reedipthanks johnsom17:28
johnsomNP17:28
ankur-gupta-f4thanks reedip johnsom17:28
reedipbtw, any points for  https://review.openstack.org/404774 ?17:28
reedipjohnsom ^^17:28
openstackgerritReedip proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Assign dns-name to port during LB creation  https://review.openstack.org/40477417:29
johnsomGrin, yeah, just need to find time to kick the tires on that17:29
reediphehe17:29
johnsomFeel free to keep bugging me17:29
reedipjohnsom : and I remember your point for https://review.openstack.org/27389617:30
reedipAs you stated, I need to put up the DB for https://review.openstack.org/412971 , right ?17:30
johnsomOk17:30
reedipI will do it over the weekend...17:30
johnsomreedip On that last one, consider coding it differently so that empty is ok/default so you don't have to do a DB migration17:31
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-lbaas17:32
reedipIRC should have a thumbs-up sign ! ....17:32
reedipconsider a thumbs-up johnsom :)17:32
johnsomGot it17:32
johnsomAlso, now that the Octavia v2 API for load balancer is merged, you could add that17:32
reedipok17:32
johnsomThen you would be in super good shape17:33
reedip:D17:35
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-lbaas17:36
*** csomerville has quit IRC17:47
*** zioproto has quit IRC18:01
*** armax has quit IRC18:10
*** dlundquist has quit IRC18:13
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas18:14
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas18:22
*** reedip has quit IRC18:41
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas18:44
*** tesseract has quit IRC18:50
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas18:57
*** catintheroof has quit IRC18:59
*** aojea has quit IRC19:02
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-lbaas19:02
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC19:05
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas19:06
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas19:14
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas19:16
*** aojea has quit IRC19:34
*** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas19:40
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC19:58
*** eezhova has quit IRC20:07
openstackgerritGerman Eichberger proposed openstack/octavia master: [WIP] Adds the ability to failover a load balancer  https://review.openstack.org/44434720:08
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas20:25
*** cpuga has quit IRC20:29
*** cpuga has joined #openstack-lbaas20:29
*** cpuga has quit IRC20:30
*** cpuga has joined #openstack-lbaas20:30
*** cpuga has quit IRC20:35
*** csomerville has quit IRC20:50
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-lbaas20:50
*** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas21:00
*** eezhova has quit IRC21:10
*** catintheroof has quit IRC21:16
*** ipsecguy has quit IRC21:21
*** ipsecguy has joined #openstack-lbaas21:22
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas21:27
*** dlundquist has joined #openstack-lbaas21:35
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia master: DB migration to add ID column to HM  https://review.openstack.org/43045121:36
*** gcheresh_ has quit IRC21:44
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas21:49
*** csomerville has quit IRC21:51
*** eezhova has quit IRC22:06
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas22:40
*** blogan has quit IRC22:45
*** blogan has joined #openstack-lbaas22:47
*** aojea has quit IRC23:10
*** beardedeagle has quit IRC23:18
*** reedip has quit IRC23:21
johnsomHas anyone here done a single call create against neutron-lbaas?23:36
johnsomOh, wow, why in the world did we do that????23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!