Thursday, 2016-04-21

*** Aish has joined #openstack-lbaas00:25
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas00:25
*** Aish has left #openstack-lbaas00:25
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas00:34
*** alhu has quit IRC00:36
*** kev0 has joined #openstack-lbaas00:36
*** alhu has joined #openstack-lbaas00:36
*** alhu has quit IRC00:36
*** ajmiller_ has joined #openstack-lbaas00:37
*** kevo has quit IRC00:38
*** ajmiller has quit IRC00:39
*** reedip_ has quit IRC00:39
*** kev0 has quit IRC00:39
openstackgerritDoug Wiegley proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Bump to neutron-lib 0.1.0  https://review.openstack.org/28543900:47
*** reedip_ has joined #openstack-lbaas00:52
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC00:55
*** minwang2 has quit IRC01:04
*** Purandar has quit IRC01:22
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:23
*** doug-fish has quit IRC01:24
*** Aish has joined #openstack-lbaas01:29
openstackgerritDoug Wiegley proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Switch to using hacking checks from neutron-lib  https://review.openstack.org/28543901:35
openstackgerritDoug Wiegley proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Switch to using hacking checks from neutron-lib  https://review.openstack.org/28543901:50
*** Aish has quit IRC01:51
*** yamamot__ has joined #openstack-lbaas01:56
kongreview request: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305551/, I have a script will be depend on that, please challenge me or comment it :-)02:08
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC02:19
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas02:20
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas02:34
openstackgerritFranklin Naval proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: WIP: Neutron-LBaaS: Protocol tests  https://review.openstack.org/30871802:40
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-lbaas02:40
*** fnaval has quit IRC02:41
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC02:43
blogandougwig, johnsom: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308384/03:10
bloganneed +2's on that, thogh i'm tempted to just merge it to fix the breakage03:10
dougwigblogan: looking03:11
blogandougwig: thanks03:14
*** yamamot__ has quit IRC03:15
*** doug-fish has quit IRC03:25
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas03:27
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas03:30
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC03:35
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas03:39
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas03:42
openstackgerritMerged openstack/neutron-lbaas: Fix test_quotas  https://review.openstack.org/30838403:47
*** alhu has joined #openstack-lbaas03:54
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas03:57
*** yamamot__ has joined #openstack-lbaas03:59
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:01
konghi, guys, I want to add timestamps on octavia resources, does that make sense?04:09
kongfor example, it will have created_at and updated_at on loadbalancer, so external monitoring script can check whether a loadbalancer is stuck in a temporary status for a long time, and do something based on that.04:11
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas04:11
kongthis will solve https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/1496646 to some extend, let monitoring script do that job04:12
openstackLaunchpad bug 1496646 in octavia "db mismatch between neutron and octavia." [High,Confirmed]04:12
kongwithout the timestamp info, we can hardly handle that inconsistency04:14
*** prabampm has joined #openstack-lbaas04:14
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-lbaas04:17
blogankong: that needs to be added anyway for tracking uptime :)04:26
blogankong: so it has added benefits04:26
bloganwell updated_at doesn't help that but it is useful04:26
*** doug-fish has quit IRC04:26
blogankong: i think another request was that we have a launched_at timestamp as well04:27
kongblogan: what's the meaning by 'launched_at'?04:27
bloganlaunched_at is when the POST request came in for the loadbalancer, created_at would be when that LB goes active04:28
kongblogan: If I do that, I will use oslo db module, it only has created_at and updated_at by default :-(04:29
blogankong: oh boo04:29
bloganwould created_at happen on API POST?04:29
bloganwell for what you want it would04:29
kongblogan: yes04:30
kongcreated_at will be generated automatically when db resource is created04:30
bloganthrough sqlalchemy? or native db ON CREATE/ON UPDATE commands?04:31
blogancan't remember if mysql has ON CREATE04:31
kongblogan: I mean : https://github.com/openstack/oslo.db/blob/master/oslo_db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L13504:32
bloganah okay through sqlalchemy then, thats fine04:32
blogankong: you may as well just import that module and create your own TimestampMixin that inherits from that but you also add launched_at :)04:33
bloganwell i dont mean you have ot, if launched_at is wanted04:34
kong blogan, but in that case, created_at will not be the same with what you said04:34
kong'created_at would be when that LB goes active'04:34
blogankong: well that can just be updated as part of the update to active04:35
blogankong: a very minor downside would be that created_at would be the same timestamp as launched_at until active04:35
blogankong: then agian maybe we keep created_at as the API POST and make a new one called active_at04:36
bloganand forget the launched_at04:36
konghmm, will be different with its meaning of other projects ...04:36
kongblogan: yes04:36
kongblogan: agree04:36
blogankong: i thought nova used launched_at and created_at04:36
bloganif they do they're probably not using this timestamp, and forgive me for advocating doing something nova is doing :(04:37
kongblogan: nova may probably not use oslo db for that04:38
konganyway, I'll make a preliminary patch for that, add created_at and updated_at at first, then add active_at if there is really a need04:38
kongit should be easy i think04:38
blogankong: i'd do the active_at stuff, and discussions can happen on that04:38
bloganyeah it'll be easy to add active_at, just inherit from the oslo_db class and add your own04:39
kongblogan: ok, thanks, I will write the code04:40
blogankong: cool thanks04:40
kongblogan: btw, could you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305551/ if you're available, it's easy, but my script needs it04:40
bloganugh 9 lines of code04:41
bloganyou're asking too much04:41
kongeys04:41
blogani have a hard limit of 2 lines of code per review04:41
kong...04:41
kongI just don't know if the change makes sense04:42
bloganim kidding04:42
blogan:)04:42
kong:-)04:42
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas04:43
bloganseems ok, i'd like johnsom to definitely review it though04:44
kongblogan: thanks very much04:47
kongblogan: do I need submit a bp or spec for timestamp stuff?04:48
kongi think it's pretty staightforward04:48
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC04:48
*** rcernin has quit IRC04:48
kongbut I will do if it's octavia tradition :-)04:48
*** neelashah has quit IRC04:48
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas04:50
blogankong: yeah its straightforward04:50
blogando a bug report at least04:50
kongblogan: fair enough04:51
blogani like neutron's rfe process, don't think we have that process in octavia though04:51
*** Purandar has joined #openstack-lbaas04:53
*** doug-fish has quit IRC04:54
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC05:04
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC05:13
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas05:17
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-lbaas05:27
*** fnaval has quit IRC05:30
*** alhu has quit IRC05:42
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC05:51
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-lbaas05:58
*** dhlorenz has quit IRC06:05
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas06:26
*** armax has quit IRC06:37
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas06:39
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas06:52
*** dhlorenz_ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:03
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC07:03
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-lbaas07:03
*** tesseract is now known as Guest1450907:04
*** dhlorenz has quit IRC07:05
*** woodster_ has quit IRC07:18
*** permalac has quit IRC07:19
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas07:23
*** eranra has quit IRC07:31
*** dhlorenz_ has quit IRC07:31
*** Purandar has quit IRC07:33
*** eranra has joined #openstack-lbaas07:33
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas07:39
*** kevo has joined #openstack-lbaas07:42
*** celebdor has quit IRC08:07
openstackgerritVictor Stinner proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Port test_db_loadbalancer to Python 3  https://review.openstack.org/30823908:08
openstackgerritVictor Stinner proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Finish to port unit tests to Python 3  https://review.openstack.org/30828508:08
openstackgerritVictor Stinner proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Port more service unit tests to Python 3  https://review.openstack.org/30822108:08
openstackgerritVictor Stinner proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Port more unit tests to Python 3  https://review.openstack.org/30820408:08
openstackgerritVictor Stinner proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Port even more service tests to Python 3  https://review.openstack.org/30823408:08
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-lbaas08:33
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas08:46
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC08:51
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:02
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas09:18
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas09:31
*** doug-fish has quit IRC09:36
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas09:59
*** johnsom_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:02
*** johnsom has quit IRC10:04
*** yamamot__ has quit IRC10:12
*** Guest14509 has quit IRC10:22
*** Guest14509 has joined #openstack-lbaas10:24
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:47
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:47
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC10:49
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC10:51
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC10:52
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:54
*** jorgem has quit IRC11:00
*** jorgem has joined #openstack-lbaas11:00
*** dhlorenz has quit IRC11:05
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:07
*** dhlorenz_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:08
*** dhlorenz_ has quit IRC11:08
*** dhlorenz_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:08
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas11:08
*** dhlorenz_ has quit IRC11:11
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC11:12
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:16
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas11:17
*** rtheis has joined #openstack-lbaas11:21
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC11:30
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:33
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC11:46
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas11:50
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas11:58
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC11:58
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:09
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:10
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:11
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC12:11
*** krotscheck_dcm is now known as krotscheck12:15
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas12:21
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC12:38
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:39
*** rtheis has quit IRC12:50
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:52
*** links has quit IRC12:59
*** matt-borland has joined #openstack-lbaas13:04
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas13:05
*** rtheis has joined #openstack-lbaas13:09
*** doug-fish has quit IRC13:13
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas13:13
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas13:16
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas13:17
*** doug-fish has quit IRC13:17
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC13:21
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas13:27
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-lbaas13:28
*** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:29
*** doug-fish has quit IRC13:33
*** BjoernT is now known as Bjoern_zZzZzZzZ13:36
*** Bjoern_zZzZzZzZ is now known as BjoernT13:36
*** dhlorenz has quit IRC13:48
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC13:54
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:54
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC13:59
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas14:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas14:04
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC14:09
*** prabampm has quit IRC14:13
*** fnaval has quit IRC14:15
*** prabampm has joined #openstack-lbaas14:15
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas14:17
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC14:19
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas14:20
*** kobis has quit IRC14:23
*** eranra has quit IRC14:32
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas14:36
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas14:44
*** fnaval has quit IRC14:45
*** alhu has joined #openstack-lbaas14:45
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas14:48
*** dhlorenz_ has joined #openstack-lbaas14:51
*** dhlorenz has quit IRC14:54
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-lbaas14:58
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:03
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:04
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:05
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:06
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:09
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:09
*** kbyrne has quit IRC15:10
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:11
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:12
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:15
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:17
*** TrevorV|Home has joined #openstack-lbaas15:20
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:20
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:22
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas15:23
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:24
mhaydenwith lbaasv2 -- i should be able to create a pool without specifying a load balancer or listener to attach to, right?15:25
mhaydeni'm hunting down a neutronclient issue15:25
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:25
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC15:26
TrevorV|Homemhayden I don't think so...15:27
mhaydenperhaps i'm reading some things wrong15:27
mhaydenis it possible to make a single pool and attach it to more than one listener?15:27
mhaydenfor example, if i had listeners on 80 + 8080, could i configure the same pool for both of those listeners?15:27
TrevorV|HomeShared pools I *think* is a thing.15:28
TrevorV|HomeI'm pretty sure that was merged15:28
TrevorV|HomeNot sure if its enabled by default though, depends on the env15:28
mhaydenokay, i'll go take a look15:28
TrevorV|HomeYeah, sorry I'm not more of a help :(15:28
mhaydenthat's okay15:28
mhaydenare you thinking it's a configurable option?15:28
*** johnsom_ is now known as johnsom15:32
TrevorV|HomeI believe its a deployment option, yeah, like a specific extension15:32
TrevorV|HomeI can double check its "availability" though, lemme see15:32
johnsommhayden Pools must be tied to the load balancer and/or listener.15:32
TrevorV|Homejohnsom he was asking about shared pools in v215:32
johnsommhayden Pools can be shared between listeners, no config necessary15:33
TrevorV|HomeWe added it to nlbaas right johnsom ?  Its not just in octavia right?15:33
johnsomIt is in both, yes15:33
TrevorV|Homejohnsom I meant it might not be available in the deployment, is shared pools by default in nlbaas now?15:33
johnsomNot 100% sure which drivers support it, other than Octavia however.15:34
johnsomYes, by default15:34
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:34
johnsomMitaka15:34
xgermanshared pools is a thing but you need to define an LB instead of listener when creating them15:34
TrevorV|HomeOh, so the driver we're using in the deployment would affect it, alright that's what I was getting at (albeit poorly ha ha)15:34
xgermanLB driver would need to implement the extension of course :-)15:34
TrevorV|Homethere you go mhayden :D15:35
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:35
mhaydenxgerman: ah, okay -- i was trying to read through the extension and see how it worked15:35
mhaydenso 1) make a LB 2) make a pool attached to the LB 3) create a listener with default_pool_id of the pool created?15:35
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:36
johnsomYep15:36
xgermanyep, or you can create L7 stuff and attach pool and listener15:36
mhaydeni keep forgetting about l715:36
xgermanI only know because I added it to my lab talk15:37
mhaydenah, is shared pools a mitaka feature?15:38
johnsomYeah, Stephen will walk through it as part of the LBaaS talk as well15:38
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:38
* mhayden is signed up for that thing15:38
mhaydenAH -- it's not in liberty15:39
* mhayden applies head to desk :)15:39
mhaydenthat's why i keep having issues15:39
johnsomAh yes, Mitaka feature15:39
xgermanyep, liberty won’t do that15:39
mhaydenthanks, folks15:39
mhaydenthat helps15:39
bloganmhayden: icehouse may have it15:41
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:41
* blogan likes to send people on wild goose chases15:42
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas15:42
elarsonmhayden: I think L7 played funfunfun fest this last go around #pretendthatweredead #dadjokes2016 :troll3:15:42
mhaydenblogan: I KNOW WHERE YOU SIT15:42
bloganmhayden: i moved!15:43
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:43
*** eezhova has quit IRC15:46
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC15:48
*** bana_k has quit IRC15:48
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-lbaas15:49
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas15:49
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:01
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:01
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:04
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:05
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:08
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:09
*** Purandar has joined #openstack-lbaas16:09
*** bogdan has joined #openstack-lbaas16:09
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:10
*** Purandar has quit IRC16:10
bogdanHi, I am trying LBaaS v2 with Octavia on Liberty, after lb creation it the loadbalancer-... port has status DOWN, no errors in the neutron or octavia logs, ip netns exec $NSP ping $LB-IP says "No rout to host", any idea what could be wrong and how to troubleshoot?16:11
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:11
*** Purandar has joined #openstack-lbaas16:12
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:13
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:13
a2hilljohnsom: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/303220/16:15
a2hillwhen/if you get a chance, please16:15
*** numan_ has quit IRC16:16
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-lbaas16:23
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:24
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:24
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:26
*** bogdan has quit IRC16:26
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:26
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:29
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:29
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:36
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:37
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:37
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:38
*** bana_k has quit IRC16:39
*** Guest14509 has quit IRC16:40
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas16:50
*** minwang2 has quit IRC16:51
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:58
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas16:58
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-lbaas16:59
*** fnaval has quit IRC17:02
*** doug-fis_ has quit IRC17:02
*** kevinbenton has quit IRC17:02
fnaval_hi - should I not be able to have a HTTP listener with a HTTPS pool?17:04
*** kevinbenton has joined #openstack-lbaas17:05
*** Kiall has quit IRC17:07
*** Kiall has joined #openstack-lbaas17:10
*** dean has joined #openstack-lbaas17:10
*** dean is now known as Guest6369317:10
*** armax_ has joined #openstack-lbaas17:13
TrevorV|HomeHey johnsom, could I get your help with something?17:13
*** purandar_k has joined #openstack-lbaas17:14
*** purandar_k has quit IRC17:14
*** reedip_ has quit IRC17:15
xgermanif it’s a simple question I might know the answer as well :-)17:15
*** kevo has quit IRC17:15
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:15
johnsomfnaval_ I don't think we have HTTPS support on pools.17:18
johnsomTrevorV|Home What is up?17:18
*** bank_ has joined #openstack-lbaas17:18
TrevorV|Homejohnsom I'll PM you so we're not spamming in here about my stuffs17:18
johnsomOK17:19
fnaval_johnsom: ok, that's what im seeing in the api.  it throws a conflict which I suppose is the correct behavior17:19
*** Purandar has quit IRC17:19
*** armax has quit IRC17:19
*** dhlorenz_ has quit IRC17:19
*** amit213 has quit IRC17:19
*** mhayden has quit IRC17:19
*** a2hill has quit IRC17:19
*** armax_ is now known as armax17:19
*** bogdan has joined #openstack-lbaas17:19
*** bogdan has quit IRC17:19
*** bogdan has joined #openstack-lbaas17:19
fnaval_i was thinking that it would support re-encryption17:19
johnsomYeah, we haven't done that yet17:19
*** fnaval_ is now known as fnaval17:19
*** ptoohill has joined #openstack-lbaas17:20
fnavalkk thanks for the info johnsom17:20
fnavalrather clarification17:20
*** bana_k has quit IRC17:21
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-lbaas17:22
bogdansorry I had to disconnect, did anyone respond on the LBaaS v2 balancer status DOWN issue?17:22
*** mhayden has joined #openstack-lbaas17:23
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas17:25
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC17:27
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas17:29
bogdanis this the right channel for LBaaS v2 with Octavia?17:30
johnsombogdan Hi.  You are in the right place.  Can you explain the problem you are seeing?17:32
*** bank_ has quit IRC17:36
*** bank_ has joined #openstack-lbaas17:37
fnavalanother question: do all the members of a pool have to be configured for the pools protocol?17:40
fnavale.g.  members that are listening/serving on https - do they have to be in pools that are https also?  could there be members that are serving/listening on http but be in a https pool?17:40
fnavali noticed in the api that there isn't a way to specify the protocol of a member17:41
johnsomYes, the protocol is at the pool level and not per member17:42
fnavaldoes it matter what protocol the backend member is serving?17:46
fnavalit appears that port is only information in the member list details17:46
fnavalso, if I misconfigured a backend member to be https but it's on a http pool, would the api error?  or would the health check show it as down?17:47
johnsomWell, if the port is serving something other than was configured on the pool, the connection may not work, but that is user error17:47
johnsomNo, API doesn't have any way to know what the user created on the member17:48
johnsomHealth check, if the health monitor is configured for http but the member on that port is serving https, would result in the member reported as error and removed from the rotation17:48
*** neelashah has quit IRC17:52
fnavaljohnsom: cool thanks for the explain - this gives me more info on how to test it.17:52
openstackgerritAishwarya Thangappa proposed openstack/octavia: Adds a new feature to limit the amphora build rate  https://review.openstack.org/30330417:53
*** ChrisBenson1 has quit IRC17:54
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-lbaas17:56
*** kevo has joined #openstack-lbaas17:58
*** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-lbaas18:02
*** doug-fish has quit IRC18:04
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas18:07
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/30776118:14
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas18:16
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas18:20
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC18:21
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas18:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:25
*** eezhova has joined #openstack-lbaas18:29
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas18:34
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-lbaas18:35
*** numan_ has quit IRC18:42
*** Guest63693 has quit IRC18:42
*** armax has quit IRC18:44
TrevorV|Homejohnsom I went ahead and updated the other test base18:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas18:45
TrevorV|HomeAdded the extension specifically and then updated the test.  Should work with tox and by itself, testing now18:45
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-lbaas18:47
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-lbaas18:47
*** armax has quit IRC18:50
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas18:57
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas18:57
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC19:04
*** amotoki has quit IRC19:05
*** doug-fis_ has quit IRC19:06
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:06
*** bogdan has quit IRC19:06
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas19:08
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas19:08
*** rcernin has quit IRC19:19
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-lbaas19:30
*** bogdan has joined #openstack-lbaas19:31
bogdanI am trying to setup LBaaS v2 with Octavia on Liberty, after lb creation the "loadbalancer-..." port has status DOWN, no errors in the neutron or any of the octavia process logs, also no qlbaas-* namespace gets created and ip netns exec qdhcp-... ping $LB-IP says "No rout to host", any idea what could be wrong and how to troubleshoot?19:31
fnavaljohnsom ^^ any idea?19:39
FritoDoes any one in here have any idea how to change the interface "o-hm0" from the "192.168.0.X" address space? When I run ./stack I end up loosing network b/c that conflicts with my home network (eth0 / wlan0).19:47
*** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-lbaas19:49
*** doug-fis_ has quit IRC19:50
johnsombogdan Octavia does not setup namespaces on the devstack host as it does not need them.  Octavia builds load balancers in service VMs19:50
*** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-lbaas19:50
* Frito feels like he breaks all the things19:52
johnsomFrito, yes, octavia/devstack/settings OCTAVIA_MGMT_SUBNET* settings19:53
*** doug-fish has quit IRC19:53
*** doug-fis_ has quit IRC19:54
FritoWhoots! Thanks johnsom19:56
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:56
bogdanjohnsom this is relief of a kind - at leastthis oneis not broken at my side. Any idea why the balancer port status is DOWN? how to troubleshoot?19:57
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas19:58
johnsombogdan Also note, each load balancer gets two ports, one of which is status "down".  This is for the allowed address pairs to function.19:59
johnsombogdan Are you running this on devstack?19:59
johnsombogdan If you are, once the listener is created, you should be able to curl to the "vip_address" listed in the "neutron lbaas-loadbalancer-list" output.20:00
johnsombogdan If you don't have a pool or members it should return 50320:01
bogdanjohnsom I am not on devstack and I have listener and a pool with 2 members20:02
johnsombogdan Ok, check your 'neutron lbaas-loadbalancer-status' output to see if those members are up.  Assuming you have added a health monitor20:03
johnsombogdan If not on devstack, check that you have a route from your host to the network your vip is on.  Also check security groups.20:03
johnsombogdan If you are trying to use a floating IP to the VIP address, note that DVR has some bugs and you may not be able to use the FIP with DVR enabled.20:04
bogdanjohnsom members are up, security groups are ok because I have tried to ping and curl the members directly via their IPs in the private network (the same network where loadbalancer is created), I do not have route to the internal/private network but I am accessing the private network IPs via their qdhcp namespace20:06
bogdanjohnsom I tried the Floating IP associated to the balancer - made no difference20:06
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas20:07
bogdanjohnsom is there something that I should find in the Octavia or Neutron logs?20:07
johnsomHmm, so LB VIP is in the same network as the members.  One-arm setup.  Should be working, especially is the status command returned that the members are "ONLINE"20:08
bogdanjohnsom but it is strange that I do not get the second port - I only get one port per balancer20:08
bogdanjohnsom yes, the only port that gets created with the balancer is in the same network as members. where should I see the second port?20:10
johnsombogdan When you run "nova list", look for the "amphora" vm.  Ignore the "lb-mgmt-net" IP, but the other IP, this is the IP on the second port.  It should be very close to the VIP IP20:10
*** crc32 has quit IRC20:10
johnsomYou can do "neutron port-list | grep <nova list IP>" to find the other port20:11
*** bank_ has quit IRC20:11
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC20:11
bogdanjohnsom well the strange thing is that I have no amphora vm20:11
bogdanjohnsom ok it seems that I did not look at the Octavia logs for a while, I only monitored them until some steps ...let me check them again and will get back to you20:12
johnsomOk, that is a big problem. ha.  Ok, so to track that down, look in the octavia worker log.  It's o-cw on devstack, but probably named something different on your system20:12
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas20:12
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas20:13
johnsomIt should tell you why nova failed to boot an instance.20:13
johnsomTypical issues are missing glance image, missing glance image ID in the config, etc.20:13
johnsombogdan Things in the [controller_worker] section of the octavia.conf20:14
*** eezhova has quit IRC20:19
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC20:19
fnavalwhen we talk about listeners and pools, should we say: "connect a listener to a pool" or "connect a pool to a listener"?   i started to say the latter, but I think the former is correct.20:20
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas20:20
johnsomfnaval, yeah, I think both are actually correct now.20:20
fnavalah ok.  but before shared pools, I think a listener was needed to create a pool20:21
johnsomCorrect20:21
bloganlink pool and listener together :)20:21
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC20:24
fnavalif I dont specify a listener to a pool creation, a pool wont have a listener on that pool ever?  is that correct?  how do I update a pool with no listeners, with a listener?20:24
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:25
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas20:25
xgermanyep, no listener that pool won’t have a listener20:25
xgermanyou can do an update on the listener and set the default pool… fnaval20:26
fnavalah, default_pool_id on a listener create, apparently20:26
bloganisn't default_pool_id updateable on the listener?20:26
xgermanit is20:26
johnsomYep20:26
fnavali see.  ok, kinda still trying to get my head around that since the pool's listener gets updated by a update to the default_pool_id on a listener.  I think that should have been done on the poolside20:27
xgermanwell, blogan designed that stuff… you know where he sits20:29
* xgerman hides20:29
bloganxgerman: some of that got added to teh shared pools constructs20:30
* blogan finds xgerman20:30
bloganpeekaboo20:30
*** armax has quit IRC20:30
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas20:32
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC20:35
*** piet has joined #openstack-lbaas20:38
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-lbaas20:41
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Add Health Monitor Max Retries Down  https://review.openstack.org/30608420:48
*** krotscheck has quit IRC20:48
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-lbaas20:48
*** fawadk has joined #openstack-lbaas20:54
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC20:54
*** rtheis has quit IRC20:57
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas20:59
*** fawadk has quit IRC20:59
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC21:00
openstackgerritMerged openstack/neutron-lbaas: Set HTTP status code to 409 for LBs in PENDING*  https://review.openstack.org/30659121:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia: Run amphora haproxy in a network namespace  https://review.openstack.org/30029221:03
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas21:03
*** BjoernT has quit IRC21:06
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas21:07
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC21:08
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas21:08
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC21:08
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas21:11
*** TrevorV|Home has quit IRC21:11
*** matt-borland has quit IRC21:12
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/30776321:13
*** crc32 has quit IRC21:14
openstackgerritMadhusudhan Kandadai proposed openstack/octavia: Give permission to run this script at gate  https://review.openstack.org/30605321:15
*** reedip_ has joined #openstack-lbaas21:23
*** piet has quit IRC21:38
*** rcernin has quit IRC21:39
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas21:52
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-lbaas21:59
*** BjoernT has quit IRC22:03
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas22:06
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia: Defer updating role and vrrp_priority for failover  https://review.openstack.org/30555122:07
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC22:12
*** ggolin has joined #openstack-lbaas22:12
*** bogdan has quit IRC22:14
*** doug-fish has quit IRC22:14
*** armax has quit IRC22:16
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC22:16
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia: Update amp_network to allow multiple networks  https://review.openstack.org/30322022:19
fnavalcan I have members that are listening on the same port as part of the same pool?22:20
xgermanI think so22:20
fnavalok. gonna test it out too22:20
rm_workthe member listening port doesn't matter, it's per client node22:20
fnavali would think so also22:20
rm_workit's just whatever you want22:20
rm_workerr, per host node22:20
xgermanyou can evan have the same member twice if you have two services on different ports BTW22:20
fnavalrm_work: it doesn't have to match the listener's port right?22:20
rm_workright not at all22:21
xgermannot at all22:21
rm_workone of my use-cases for a LB is to translate a port22:21
fnavalah, yes, same member (ip) but different ports22:21
fnavalgood to know.  another test case for me to automate22:21
rm_workyeah, if you have like an archaic single-threaded webapp, you can run it like 8 times on an 8-core machine, on ports 8080-8084 and then add that same IP with each port22:22
rm_workand bam, multithreaded :P (kinda)22:22
fnavalyea that's kinda how the scenario tests do it22:22
fnavaluse the same instance but create 2 web servers listening on different ports22:23
rm_workyep22:23
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas22:25
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas22:27
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC22:27
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC22:28
*** ChrisBenson has joined #openstack-lbaas22:29
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-lbaas22:30
*** krotscheck is now known as krotscheck_dcm22:32
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC22:40
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:43
*** reedip_ has quit IRC22:44
*** reedip_ has joined #openstack-lbaas22:44
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC23:19
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas23:34
*** minwang2 has quit IRC23:45
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas23:48
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-lbaas23:54
kongdid anyone see this problem:23:57
konghttp://paste.openstack.org/show/495068/23:57
kongwhen I run tox -e py2723:57
kongfor octavia23:57
*** ajmiller_ has quit IRC23:57
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC23:58
johnsompy27 is running sphinx????  Hmmm23:58
johnsomHaven't seen it.23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!