Thursday, 2016-04-07

harlowjaqq for u guys00:37
johnsomSure00:37
harlowjai'm talking to a coworker and he's wondering if monitor protocol type can change for lbaas api00:37
harlowjai'm not to faimilar with all this, just asking :)00:38
johnsomno, it's delete and re-add00:38
harlowjais that ever changing?00:38
harlowjaor is impossible :-P00:38
* harlowja just wondering00:39
johnsomWell, that is what basically has to happen on the backends, so motivation to change it is low00:39
johnsomPlus it gets messy with going to and from monitors like HTTP that have additional info, like expected codes00:40
harlowjaright00:40
johnsomhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/API_2.0#Update_a_Health_Monitor00:40
harlowjaanother question, is a kind of cascading delete of things going to happen anytime?00:42
harlowjacoworker making UI is like i have to do all these cascading deletes myself :-P00:42
johnsomHa, it happened in Mitaka.  Then our neutron PTL pulled it last minute because he didn't like the way it was implemented.00:42
harlowjathe cascade part00:42
harlowja?00:42
johnsomSo, single call create and single call delete are going to be newton features00:43
johnsomWIP00:43
johnsomharlowja BTW, there is a horizon dashboard for LBaaSv200:45
harlowjaya, i'm getting a run down on the various things/weirdness in the api00:45
harlowjathat coworker didn't like00:45
harlowjau guys might like to listen in sometime :)00:45
harlowjauser-feedback :-P00:45
harlowja*if u interested ;)00:46
johnsomHa!  If he thinks this is bad, he should have seen v100:47
harlowja:)00:47
johnsomSure, happy to get input00:47
johnsomHappy to have someone else join the meetings and write code too... grin00:47
harlowja;)00:48
johnsomhttps://pypi.python.org/pypi?name=neutron-lbaas-dashboard&version=1.0.0&:action=display00:48
harlowjaya, godaddy is building a custom kind of UI for this (for better or worse)00:49
johnsomOk00:50
johnsomWell, they can always look at how it was done in horizon to ideas00:50
harlowjaya, i'm hearing about the stats stuffs00:50
harlowjathe output format seems scary, lol00:51
johnsomYeah, that is an area that has not had a lot of attention.00:51
harlowja:)00:51
johnsomstats or status?00:51
johnsomstats is pretty simple00:51
harlowjai think load-balancer-stats00:51
harlowjathat shows like bytes_in and stuff00:51
johnsomhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/API_2.0#Retrieve_a_specific_Load_Balancer.27s_Statistics00:52
johnsomYeah, that is really simple json00:52
johnsomStatus, well, that is another story00:52
harlowjaya, hearing about reconnecting stats to listeners is hard00:52
harlowja(if i undertstand it(00:53
johnsomWe don't do stats at the listener level, just the load balancer level00:53
harlowjaoh, hmmmm00:53
johnsomlisteners are like TCP ports00:53
johnsomI hope they aren't looking at the V1 api00:55
harlowjaya, hmmm i'm confused to :-P00:55
johnsomhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/286381/00:55
harlowjaya, its v200:56
johnsomLBaaS v1 is about to hit the circular file00:56
*** harlowja has quit IRC01:00
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-lbaas01:03
reedipjohnsom: ping01:07
johnsomreedip Hi01:08
reedipjohnsom: I saw your above message about updating HealthMonitors: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/API_2.0#Update_a_Health_Monitor01:08
reedipjohnsom: hello :)01:08
johnsomYes01:09
reedipjohnsom: Do you know that NeutronClient does not currently display these options :P ( or in other words, can LBaaS team check the following review out?? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255093/27)01:09
johnsomYes, I am aware of that issue.  They are available via the api pass through01:10
reedipI have been trying to get this ^^ merged for some time , as it allows a lot of LBaaS options to be visible to the user01:10
johnsomI even commented on that patch01:10
reedipBut it has been sitting idle for some time now.... should I rebase it to get more eyes ?01:11
johnsomIt doesn't look like it needs a rebase.  I would solicit for reviews in the openstack-neutron channel.01:12
reedipjohnsom: it would be great... :)01:13
reedipthanks01:13
*** reedip has quit IRC01:22
*** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas01:23
openstackgerritBanashankar k proposed openstack/octavia: Adding the topology info at the time of LB AMP association  https://review.openstack.org/28636501:30
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas01:34
bloganjohnsom: i thought people wanted stats per listener01:35
*** Purandar has quit IRC01:35
bloganstats per listener and stats per lb as well01:35
*** bana_k has quit IRC01:35
johnsomblogan Well I was going off of this: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/API_2.0#Retrieve_a_specific_Load_Balancer.27s_Statistics01:36
bloganyeah i think we were going to keep that but also add in listeners as well at some point01:37
johnsomI don't think we have a way to access stats per listener01:37
blogandb is setup in such a way01:37
bloganlbaas_listener_statistics i think01:37
johnsomhmm, ok.01:37
johnsomBTW, do you have a minute for a python list question?01:37
blogansure01:37
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-lbaas01:38
johnsomI get this lovely beast back when querying interfaces:01:39
johnsomhttps://gist.github.com/johnsom/42f7f933d31765bb689816422d10094001:39
*** ajmiller has quit IRC01:39
bloganyowzers01:39
johnsomI need to pull 'tx_bytes' value out of it01:39
bloganIFLA_STATS?01:40
johnsomIt's list inside lists inside lists01:40
bloganunder that key?01:40
johnsomIFLA_STATS6401:40
bloganah okay01:40
johnsomI assume we want the big numbers01:40
bloganyep01:40
blogandidnt see the 64 yet01:40
johnsomIt's hard to see anything in that mess01:40
bloganjsonlint.com01:41
johnsomAh, very nice01:41
johnsomI can get down to the attrs pretty clean with: link("get", index=3)[0]['attrs']01:42
johnsomBut my python lists is a bit weak on the best way to pull out the IFLA_STATS6401:42
bloganthe specific link you want i suppose01:43
bloganindex=3 i suppose is the 4th item in the list?01:43
johnsomYeah, I could do it with the index, but what if it's position changes?01:43
johnsomI was thinking something like this: for item in attrs if item[0] == 'IFLA_STATS64':01:44
johnsomBut that doesn't work, bad syntax01:44
bloganoh man, yeah you're going to have to loop through the attrs and check position 0 for IFLA_STATS01:44
bloganIFLA_STATS64 i mean01:44
johnsomOk, so no tricky/slick way to get there.  Fair enough.01:45
bloganfor attr in link("get", index=3)[0]['attrs'] if attr[0] == 'IFLA_STATS64' return attr[1]['tx_packets']01:45
bloganthat won't work in python01:46
bloganbut we can make it01:46
bloganhold on01:46
johnsomI can make that work01:47
bloganyou know that you will always want index 0?01:47
johnsomI just figured there was some "cleaner" way01:47
blogansorry index 301:47
johnsomNo01:47
blogannot with that monstrosity01:47
johnsomindex 3 == eth101:47
johnsomindex 1 == lo01:47
johnsomSee the fun I'm having01:48
bloganso what you pasted included index = 101:48
johnsomAll to get german's interface stats for the amp api that nobody uses01:48
bloganlol01:48
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:48
bloganhow much different will that be from what haproxy returns?01:48
blogana few bytes here i there i suppose01:48
johnsomHis includes the backend network #s01:49
johnsomby interface01:49
*** jaff_cheng has joined #openstack-lbaas01:49
johnsomOk.  I think I know what I need to do.  Thanks.  Just thought there was some python-y way I couldn't figure out.01:49
*** chenghang has joined #openstack-lbaas01:49
blogancan't you get the traffic going to members from haproxy though?01:49
bloganthere very well could be but i dont know of anything that goes that deep into dict and lists that easily01:50
johnsomDo I want to figure out if two members are on the same interface?01:50
bloganwe could name each server i the haproxy config by member-id + subnet-id01:50
johnsomI don't even want to put brain effort into that comment....01:51
bloganlol01:51
johnsomThanks again.  I hope to have the namespace thing cooked tomorrow.01:52
bloganim just saying, if haproxy returns the stats for that with the name assigned to each server in the config, you wouldn't have to do this01:52
blogannp hope kill that beast01:53
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas01:53
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas01:54
*** jaff_cheng has quit IRC01:54
*** jaff_cheng has joined #openstack-lbaas01:57
*** chenghang has quit IRC01:57
*** Purandar has joined #openstack-lbaas02:00
*** ljianbj has quit IRC02:05
*** Aish has joined #openstack-lbaas02:08
*** Aish has quit IRC02:09
*** Purandar has quit IRC02:10
*** piet has joined #openstack-lbaas02:17
*** kevo has quit IRC02:17
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas02:20
*** chenghang has joined #openstack-lbaas02:29
*** jaff_cheng has quit IRC02:29
*** minwang2 has quit IRC02:30
*** bana_k has quit IRC02:35
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas02:35
*** piet has quit IRC02:37
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas02:37
konghi, guys, today I setup my environment using Liberty Neutorn with Mitaka Octavia02:52
kongit works02:52
kongbut I have a question, in Liberty neutron-lbaas, there is no project_id passed to octiva api02:54
kongalthough the project-id is a param for get_barbican_client, but we don't use that02:55
*** piet has joined #openstack-lbaas02:55
kongso, my question is, if it's ok that we play mitaka octavia with liberty neutron/neutron-lbaas, without project id in octavia db?02:56
*** reedip__ has quit IRC03:07
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-lbaas03:08
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC03:19
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC03:20
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas03:20
*** piet has quit IRC03:29
*** piet has joined #openstack-lbaas03:35
*** chenghang has quit IRC03:39
*** jaff_cheng has joined #openstack-lbaas03:39
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas03:49
*** bana_k has quit IRC03:50
*** sekrit has quit IRC03:51
*** neelashah has quit IRC03:56
*** piet has quit IRC03:56
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC04:00
*** sekrit has joined #openstack-lbaas04:05
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas04:07
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-lbaas04:10
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas04:12
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas04:17
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas04:20
*** prabampm has joined #openstack-lbaas04:23
*** prabampm has quit IRC04:44
*** armax has quit IRC04:59
*** numan_ has quit IRC05:08
*** minwang2 has quit IRC05:10
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-lbaas05:33
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas05:43
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas05:45
*** minwang2 has quit IRC05:47
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas05:47
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas05:53
*** minwang2 has quit IRC05:57
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas05:59
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC06:02
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas06:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/octavia: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/30139406:14
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas06:17
*** minwang2 has quit IRC06:19
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas06:24
*** kevo has joined #openstack-lbaas06:24
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-lbaas06:26
*** numan_ has quit IRC06:28
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas06:28
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-lbaas06:45
*** tesseract is now known as Guest1287606:45
*** woodster_ has quit IRC06:57
*** minwang2 has quit IRC07:00
*** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas07:03
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-lbaas07:05
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas07:11
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-lbaas07:11
*** bana_k has quit IRC07:14
*** dhlorenz has quit IRC07:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Merge tag '8.0.0'  https://review.openstack.org/30257507:44
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC07:45
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas08:35
*** links has quit IRC09:31
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC09:40
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas09:44
*** jaff_cheng has quit IRC10:06
*** numan_ has quit IRC10:07
*** Kiall has quit IRC10:14
*** Kiall has joined #openstack-lbaas10:14
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:21
*** numan_ has quit IRC10:22
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas10:22
*** links has quit IRC10:39
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas10:42
nmagnezikevinbenton, ping re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299998/10:44
*** Guest12876 is now known as tesseract10:47
*** tesseract is now known as Guest7403610:48
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas10:56
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas11:06
*** rtheis has joined #openstack-lbaas11:18
openstackgerritMerged openstack/neutron-lbaas: Merge tag '8.0.0'  https://review.openstack.org/30257511:46
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC11:50
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas12:17
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:18
*** neelashah has quit IRC12:22
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas12:26
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC12:32
*** St3F_A13x has joined #openstack-lbaas12:32
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC12:34
*** dhlorenz has left #openstack-lbaas12:37
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas12:38
*** dhlorenz has left #openstack-lbaas12:38
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas12:38
dhlorenzPlease review latest active-active blueprint https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234639/.12:38
dhlorenzThere are two blueprints under that commit, one for *Active-Active Topology* and another for the *Distributor* component.12:38
dhlorenzPlease finish the review of the Topology blueprint (not changed) before moving to the Distributor.12:38
dhlorenzWe would like to push this before our demo at the Austin summit.12:38
dhlorenzWe will start pushing related code in couple of days.12:38
*** doug-fish has quit IRC12:42
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas12:42
*** doug-fish has quit IRC12:47
*** piet has joined #openstack-lbaas12:50
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas12:54
*** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:56
*** diogogmt has quit IRC12:58
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-lbaas12:59
*** doug-fish has quit IRC12:59
*** diogogmt has quit IRC13:08
*** johnsom has quit IRC13:10
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-lbaas13:11
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-lbaas13:12
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-lbaas13:12
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:18
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC13:18
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:18
*** doug-fis_ has quit IRC13:23
*** matt-borland has joined #openstack-lbaas13:28
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC13:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:40
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas13:40
*** kobis has quit IRC13:46
*** links has quit IRC13:46
*** piet has quit IRC13:49
*** piet has joined #openstack-lbaas13:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas13:57
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:03
*** thomasem_ is now known as thomasem14:08
*** diogogmt has quit IRC14:09
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas14:10
*** ChrisBenson has joined #openstack-lbaas14:17
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas14:29
*** St3F_A13x has quit IRC14:39
*** TrevorV has joined #openstack-lbaas14:42
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas14:46
*** numan_ has quit IRC14:47
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC14:49
*** St3F_A13x has joined #openstack-lbaas14:53
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC14:55
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC14:59
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas15:00
*** 7JTAALB9C has joined #openstack-lbaas15:06
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-lbaas15:07
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-lbaas15:09
*** Guest74036 has quit IRC15:10
*** neelashah has quit IRC15:25
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas15:26
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas15:30
*** links has joined #openstack-lbaas15:36
TrevorVWho was it that worked on L7 a while ago?15:41
johnsomsbalukoff15:41
TrevorVjohnsom I thought someone else worked on it before him and he helped a little here and there15:42
TrevorVWho is "Fedoruk"?15:42
johnsomEvgeny did the LBaaSv2 side of the API15:43
TrevorVThanks johnsom15:43
johnsomNP15:43
*** afranc has joined #openstack-lbaas15:44
*** links has quit IRC15:48
*** St3F_A13x has quit IRC15:49
*** pcaruana has quit IRC15:53
*** 7JTAALB9C has quit IRC15:54
*** numan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas15:54
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas15:56
openstackgerritMichael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia: Run amphora haproxy in a network namespace  https://review.openstack.org/30029215:59
*** minwang2 has quit IRC16:00
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas16:01
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas16:01
*** armax has quit IRC16:02
*** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas16:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:06
*** eranra has joined #openstack-lbaas16:07
*** Bjoern_ has joined #openstack-lbaas16:28
*** Bjoern_ is now known as BjoernT16:30
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas16:31
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/30073516:32
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:52
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas17:02
*** dhlorenz has quit IRC17:03
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas17:07
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-lbaas17:08
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/30073517:10
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/octavia: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/30287017:12
*** kevo has quit IRC17:13
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:16
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas17:33
*** ihrachys has quit IRC17:41
*** kevo has joined #openstack-lbaas17:47
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC17:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-lbaas17:51
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas17:53
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC17:57
*** piet has quit IRC18:06
*** bana_k has quit IRC18:16
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas18:16
*** Purandar has joined #openstack-lbaas18:17
bana_kHi Team, this is little urgent, can we use the amphorae in the 2 arm mode?18:20
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-lbaas18:26
bana_kjohnsom xgerman blogan bharathm18:26
johnsomYes18:27
bana_kis there any extra work needs to be done like plugging the non vip ip18:27
johnsomI don't understand your question.18:28
bharathm2 arm mode ?18:28
bana_kso if we want to use 2 arm mode18:28
bana_kyes18:28
johnsomTwo are mode is where you create the vip on one network and the members are on another network18:28
bana_kyes18:28
johnsomYou specify the networks when you create your vip and when you create your members18:28
bana_kso I tried that and we need to connect those to networks through a router18:29
johnsomNo18:29
johnsomVIP network does not need routing to member networks18:29
bana_kI created a vip on 10.0.0.0/24 network and then added a member from 11.0.0.0/24 n.w18:29
johnsomIn fact, member networks don't need a router at all18:29
bana_koh I tried to curl it didn't work18:30
johnsomYes, that works fine.  That is how I normally test18:30
bana_koops18:30
johnsomThe host that is curling to the VIP will need to have an interface or route to the VIP network, yes18:30
*** eranra has quit IRC18:31
bana_kyea  I am using default 10.0.0.0/24 network18:31
*** eranra has joined #openstack-lbaas18:31
johnsomprivate?18:31
bana_kyes18:32
johnsomYeah, that is how I test on devstack.18:32
bana_kn added a member from 10.0.0.0/24 nw also18:32
bana_kwhen I curled I was able to reach member on 10 n.w but no response from member on 11 nw18:32
bana_khmmm I am not sure what I am missing in here18:33
johnsommember on 10.0.0.0/24, was that also added on private-subnet or is that a different network that also has 10.0.0.0/24?18:33
bana_kit was on private n.w18:33
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas18:33
johnsomThis is the test script I am using this morning: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/880101b28da63b4c7c44747f3c1e2adc18:34
bana_kthanks a lot johnsom, I will try it out n see18:34
*** BjoernT has quit IRC18:35
johnsomOk18:35
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas18:43
bloganbana_k: yeah that should work, i too have a script that tests all thsoe things but i haven't run it in a while18:46
bana_kblogan johnsom : I tried out the same test again with the new loadbalancer after removing the interface from router it worked fine :)18:47
bana_kI am not sure why it didn't work the first time18:47
bana_kthanks18:48
bloganbana_k: ah okay, well at least it works, had me worried it regressed18:48
bana_khe he he I am going spin up a new devsrtack env and test it out again :)18:48
johnsomI have been extensively testing the multi-arm use case recently, so I was pretty sure it was in good shape18:49
bana_koh ok :)18:50
bloganjohnsom: thats right cuz you're diong the namespace stuff18:50
johnsomYep18:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has left #openstack-lbaas18:51
johnsomJust cleanup and unit test work left on that18:51
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:56
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-lbaas18:56
*** dhlorenz has joined #openstack-lbaas19:01
*** Purandar has quit IRC19:02
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-lbaas19:24
*** minwang2 has quit IRC19:31
TrevorVHey is this "LoadBalancerDeleteCascade" class supposed to be in Neutron LBaaS right now?  Cuz its breaking...19:36
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-lbaas19:36
TrevorVHa ha ha I guess *I* added it somehow?19:37
TrevorVRIP nevermind...19:37
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas19:42
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: WIP - Get Me A LB  https://review.openstack.org/25720119:48
TrevorVALRIGHTY19:48
TrevorVI have Get Me a LB in "working" condition, and unit tests SHOULD be passing, though I need more permutations of the graph.  If you guys want to pull it down and tinker, be my guests :D19:48
*** diogogmt has quit IRC19:52
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-lbaas19:52
*** matt-borland has quit IRC19:53
TrevorVjohnsom you running tox at all recently?  Like, the last 15 minutes?19:59
johnsomyes19:59
johnsomBut on an older checkot19:59
TrevorVI'm getting this error:  https://gist.github.com/TrevorV/955d2c472872a98d863e7a27a5f025af19:59
TrevorVIts fresh "tox -r"20:00
TrevorVAnd I also deleted the ".testrepository" and ".tox" to test it as well20:00
johnsomAh, yeah, I'm not running neutron-lbaas right now, just octavia20:00
TrevorVOh, gotcha.  Well, anyone else seeing this?  I'm getting it on a large amount of tests, and it doesn't seem to be related to my patch.20:01
*** TrevorV has quit IRC20:05
bloganthat error is being addressed in neutron right now20:07
*** Purandar has joined #openstack-lbaas20:16
openstackgerritmin wang proposed openstack/octavia: Add missing unit test for cascade lb delete  https://review.openstack.org/30068920:19
openstackgerritmin wang proposed openstack/octavia: Add missing unit test for cascade lb delete  https://review.openstack.org/30068920:20
*** numan_ has quit IRC20:28
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC20:37
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas20:42
*** matt-borland has joined #openstack-lbaas20:43
*** pcaruana has quit IRC21:01
openstackgerritFranklin Naval proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Barbican Scenario Test (TLS with Intermediates)  https://review.openstack.org/16482821:06
*** bana_k has quit IRC21:12
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-lbaas21:17
*** markvan has quit IRC21:24
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC21:24
*** Purandar has quit IRC21:25
*** markvan has joined #openstack-lbaas21:27
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-lbaas21:27
*** rtheis has quit IRC21:31
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC21:33
*** matt-borland has quit IRC21:56
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas22:00
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC22:02
*** ihrachys has quit IRC22:05
*** Purandar has joined #openstack-lbaas22:09
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC22:11
konghi, guys, do you think if it's ok that we play mitaka octavia with liberty neutron/neutron-lbaas, without project id in octavia db?22:13
blogankong: that would mean octavia does nto store the project/tenant id correct?22:16
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas22:16
kongblogan: because liberty octavia driver won't send project id to octavia service22:16
kongwhich was added in mitaka, i guess22:17
kongwhat I want to know is, does the project id matters?22:17
openstackgerritFranklin Naval proposed openstack/octavia: [WIP]: Octavia: Basic LoadBalancer Scenario Test  https://review.openstack.org/17219922:18
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-lbaas22:18
blogankong: it mattered to us internally (rackspace) but i think that was just bc of how we were deploying it22:18
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:21
kongblogan: so, for our use case, there will not have any feature lost? I'm not sure22:22
*** doug-fish has quit IRC22:23
blogankong: bc of the project_id i dont think so, but for other features i can't be sure.  I'm sure l7 and shared pools won't work22:23
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC22:24
bloganbut liberty n-lbaas doesn't have those anyway22:24
*** johnsom has quit IRC22:26
kongblogan: yes, you're right, didn't see l7 and sharedpools extension in liberty22:27
kongblogan: so, we are safe? :-)22:28
kongneed more testing22:28
kongand do we have scenario tests for liberty?22:28
*** rcernin has quit IRC22:29
blogankong: i'm going to say i think you are bc the API is meant to be backwards comaptible and project_id was added in mitaka and its not required22:29
blogankong: yes there are22:30
kongblogan: thanks, need to dig more detail22:30
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC22:31
*** minwang2 has left #openstack-lbaas22:41
*** crc32 has quit IRC22:42
*** minwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas22:42
*** qwebirc80789 has joined #openstack-lbaas22:46
qwebirc80789hello,  I have a question. How do I get the total number of floating ip addresses available and the number used using the neutron command?22:47
qwebirc80789There doesnt seem to be an option to list this, is there?22:48
bloganqwebirc80789: what command?22:51
bloganqwebirc80789: net-ip-availability-show <floating-network> should give you what you want no?22:51
qwebirc80789I cannot find the neutron command  net-ip-availability-show22:55
qwebirc80789$ Unknown command [u'net-ip-availability-show']22:56
qwebirc80789Yes. That would be what I need22:57
qwebirc80789It lists total_ips  and  used_ips22:58
qwebirc80789@blogan, would you know why I might not have the command?22:59
qwebirc80789Ok. It was added in Mitaka.23:00
qwebirc80789Since I am not at Mitaka, any other way?23:00
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-lbaas23:06
*** reedip__ has quit IRC23:16
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas23:32
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC23:37
*** qwebirc80789 has quit IRC23:39
openstackgerritBanashankar k proposed openstack/octavia: Adding the topology info at the time of LB AMP association  https://review.openstack.org/28636523:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!