Thursday, 2015-06-11

openstackgerritmin wang proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Admin_state_up tempest test for health monitor  https://review.openstack.org/17882700:14
*** mlavalle has quit IRC00:29
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas00:33
*** amotoki has quit IRC00:38
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-lbaas00:44
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC01:05
*** chlong has quit IRC01:11
*** fnaval has quit IRC01:11
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas01:22
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC02:04
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC02:11
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas02:21
*** amotoki has quit IRC02:40
*** kiran-r has quit IRC02:51
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas02:52
*** ganeshna has quit IRC03:02
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas03:35
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-lbaas03:42
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas03:49
*** kiran-r has quit IRC03:57
*** numan has joined #openstack-lbaas04:22
*** fnaval has quit IRC04:58
*** Santoshsh has joined #openstack-lbaas05:05
*** ajmiller_ has quit IRC05:05
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-lbaas05:06
*** jschwarz has joined #openstack-lbaas05:12
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-lbaas05:15
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-lbaas05:18
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-lbaas05:40
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC05:45
*** woodster_ has quit IRC06:11
*** bharath has quit IRC06:20
*** SteF has joined #openstack-lbaas06:26
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC06:35
*** apuimedo has joined #openstack-lbaas06:39
*** ganeshna has quit IRC06:49
openstackgerritAnand Shanmugam proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Adding code to prevent vip port deletion from port api  https://review.openstack.org/17601606:51
*** jschwarz has quit IRC06:51
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-lbaas06:53
*** bradjones has quit IRC07:27
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas07:28
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-lbaas07:29
*** bradjones has quit IRC07:29
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-lbaas07:29
*** ganeshna has quit IRC07:33
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas07:34
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC07:52
*** jschwarz_ has joined #openstack-lbaas07:52
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas07:55
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas08:03
*** ganeshna has quit IRC08:10
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas08:13
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC09:06
*** enikanorov has joined #openstack-lbaas09:06
*** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas09:20
*** bharath has quit IRC09:25
*** kiran-r is now known as kiran-r|afk09:46
*** kiran-r|afk is now known as kiran-r09:46
*** ganeshna has quit IRC10:21
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas10:26
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-lbaas11:03
*** ganeshna has quit IRC11:11
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC11:13
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-lbaas11:14
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas12:08
*** ganeshna has quit IRC12:13
*** ajmiller has quit IRC12:31
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas12:32
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas12:36
*** ganeshna_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:39
*** ganeshna has quit IRC12:41
*** ganeshna_ has quit IRC12:46
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:50
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas12:51
SteFHi guys . If I delete a pool, are the members which was attached to this pool deleted automatically? tnx in advance12:59
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas13:05
*** ganeshna has quit IRC13:12
*** fnaval has quit IRC13:58
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas14:11
*** localloop127 has joined #openstack-lbaas14:18
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC14:33
*** Aish has joined #openstack-lbaas14:36
*** kiran-r has quit IRC14:44
*** localloo1 has joined #openstack-lbaas14:53
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-lbaas14:55
*** localloop127 has quit IRC14:56
*** apuimedo has quit IRC15:01
*** jschwarz__ has joined #openstack-lbaas15:05
*** jorgem has joined #openstack-lbaas15:07
*** jschwarz_ has quit IRC15:08
*** TrevorV has joined #openstack-lbaas15:24
*** numan has quit IRC15:30
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-lbaas15:33
*** jorgem has quit IRC15:41
*** localloo1 is now known as localloop12715:41
*** Aish has quit IRC15:46
*** TrevorV has quit IRC15:47
*** jorgem has joined #openstack-lbaas15:48
*** jschwarz__ has quit IRC15:49
*** TrevorV has joined #openstack-lbaas15:50
*** jorgem has quit IRC15:52
*** jschwarz__ has joined #openstack-lbaas15:59
*** localloop127 has quit IRC16:02
*** localloop127 has joined #openstack-lbaas16:04
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-lbaas16:07
TrevorVjohnsom, you around yet today?16:08
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-lbaas16:10
johnsomYep16:12
*** SteF has quit IRC16:12
TrevorVSorry, was sidetracked.  I agree with everything using constants on the flows, but I don't think my bug-fix is the right place to put that change.16:13
TrevorVWoah...16:13
TrevorVSorry, had a glitch with my hexchat.16:13
*** Aish has joined #openstack-lbaas16:13
johnsomOk, I just saw that you changed the listener flow to constants, but not the controller worker and test16:15
TrevorVjohnsom, I only changed what I touched, if I recall correctly.  However, I can do another change review that will clean up all of them, because the inconsistency is something I have noted on my paper right over here ha ha16:19
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-lbaas16:20
johnsomYeah, I had a discussion with blogan about incremental updates vs. a patch that goes through and updates them all.16:20
johnsomI looks like you added a 'load_balancer' store in the controller worker.  That is what I was commenting on switching over to constants while you are there16:21
openstackgerritAishwarya Thangappa proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Tempest tests for Members using testscenarios.  https://review.openstack.org/18043616:22
*** kiran-r has quit IRC16:22
*** ebagdasa has quit IRC16:25
*** anand1712 has joined #openstack-lbaas16:30
*** anand1712 has quit IRC16:35
*** ebagdasa has joined #openstack-lbaas16:37
*** anand1712 has joined #openstack-lbaas16:38
anand1712hi16:42
*** anand1712 has quit IRC16:46
johnsomHi anand171216:52
*** ganeshna has joined #openstack-lbaas16:57
*** ganeshna has quit IRC17:02
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-lbaas17:05
*** Youcef has joined #openstack-lbaas17:07
*** mlavalle has quit IRC17:12
*** jschwarz__ has quit IRC17:20
*** localloo1 has joined #openstack-lbaas17:29
*** localloop127 has quit IRC17:31
*** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas17:55
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-lbaas17:57
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-lbaas18:01
TrevorVOh okay johnsom I didn't really take notice there, about the stores.  Good call.  I'll look into it.  However I would only change what I've worked on in that specific bug fix.18:07
johnsomTrevorV Yep, agreed18:10
TrevorVCool johnsom.  I'm about to work on the pool deletion bug, and then I might have some bandwidth to go through and update all of those to a consistent state.18:13
johnsomOk, yeah, one of us will get to it.  There is a bug, so if you start, mark it as assigned to you so Brandon or I don't work on it at the same time18:14
TrevorVI've already done that johnsom :)18:15
johnsomCool18:17
openstackgerritAishwarya Thangappa proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Tempest tests for Listener using testscenarios.  https://review.openstack.org/17981818:41
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete pool flow  https://review.openstack.org/19078019:35
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC19:44
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-lbaas19:53
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete pool flow  https://review.openstack.org/19078019:59
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete listener flow  https://review.openstack.org/19026920:09
TrevorVjohnsom, I updated for the constants on listener flow, and after I write more unit tests for the load balancer review, I'll make an all new review making ALL the flows in constants.20:10
johnsomYep, cool, already +2'd listeners20:10
TrevorVNice20:10
johnsompool I need to read through again, but looking20:11
TrevorVSure thing.  I might not have it ALL as constants, but I can do that if we really want, outside of the major review to change it.20:11
johnsomNp20:12
dougwigxgerman: how goes use case collecting for fwaas?20:15
johnsomTrevorV You lost me on the pool delete update.  If you don't delete the pool from the model won't the listerupdate task just push the same config down including the pool?20:17
openstackgerritMerged stackforge/octavia: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/19041420:18
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC20:20
TrevorVjohnsom, are you asking about the config for haproxy?20:21
johnsomYeah, this change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190780/2/octavia/controller/worker/flows/pool_flows.py20:21
TrevorVTo be perfectly honest johnsom blogan suggested I remove that.  That's not an excuse though, so give me a minute to think about it, yeah?20:23
bloganjohnsom is right, you'll have to remove that from the pool list20:23
johnsomOk, sure.20:23
bloganTrevorV: the model.delete method didn't exist, it just needs to set listener.default_pool to None20:24
johnsomHmm, I thought it did exist in the base class, but maybe not20:25
bloganno but those types of methods might be good to add just so its more readable20:25
xgermandougwig - slow20:36
xgermanwe haven’t heard back from Intel :-(20:36
xgermanon the positive IBM offered to help with the redesign20:37
johnsomTrevorV I -1'd just to track it.  Otherwise it looks good.20:37
*** Youcef has quit IRC20:41
*** Youcef has joined #openstack-lbaas20:41
TrevorVjohnsom, I'm about to push a change.20:50
johnsomCool20:52
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete pool flow  https://review.openstack.org/19078020:52
bloganjohnsom: implemented that object.delete method :)20:54
johnsomI see that.  Cool20:54
*** Youcef has quit IRC21:02
TrevorVjohnsom, blogan and I were just looking at something interesting in the listener creation steps.21:04
TrevorVIf you've created a listener say, with protocol HTTP and port 80, and you delete it, you cannot add a listener with those same 2 fields to the load balancer because of DB constraints.21:05
TrevorVSo I was about to update the flows to actually delete the listener from the DB to avoid that, but that comes with the problem of debug tracking since we won't know what the listener id was after removing it.21:05
TrevorVWhat are your thoughts?  Delete from DB is okay?  Or change something different alongside the provisioning status, like, removing the port or something.21:06
TrevorV?21:06
TrevorVI meant listener deletion steps... well it involves both.21:07
TrevorVha21:07
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete listener flow  https://review.openstack.org/19026921:17
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete pool flow  https://review.openstack.org/19078021:26
johnsomI am good with deleting it21:26
johnsomI wondered about that on the first pass, but I think deleting is ok21:27
*** apuimedo has joined #openstack-lbaas21:29
bloganjohnsom, TrevorV: i think deleting for now is good and if we need that historical debugging capability we solve it then21:29
johnsomThat is what the log is for... grin21:30
*** TrevorV has quit IRC21:35
*** TrevorV has joined #openstack-lbaas21:37
*** localloo1 has quit IRC21:51
*** bharath has quit IRC21:59
*** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas21:59
*** apuimedo has quit IRC22:04
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete listener flow  https://review.openstack.org/19026922:05
TrevorVjohnsom, added a test.  Hope I didn't miss anything ha ha22:05
madhu_akblogan: just a question, if I want to run scenario tests after making changes with imports (for example, fnaval's patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158904/), how to run that test? my understanding is, only apiv2 tests are being run22:06
johnsomGrin, sorry to be a stikler22:06
bloganmadhu_ak: you mean run that test locally?22:07
bloganmadhu_ak: or run just that single test?22:07
madhu_akexactly22:07
madhu_akthat test locally..22:07
blogantox -e apiv222:08
bloganthat doesn't work?22:08
bloganyou can get it even more narrow and provide the dotted path to the test module22:08
madhu_akyeah, but that file is in scenario folder, I dont see that will run22:08
bloganoh scenario tests! i read that as testscenarios sorry22:08
madhu_ak:)22:08
blogandoesn't look like tox has a listing for scenario22:10
bloganso you'd have to create one :)22:11
madhu_aksure, not a problem22:11
madhu_akwill research on it and propose it22:11
bloganmadhu_ak: look at tox.ini22:12
madhu_akalso, if I need dependencies, can I just bring the relevant files into tempest tree?22:12
madhu_aksure22:12
madhu_akI mean, tempest_lib tree22:12
*** mlavalle has quit IRC22:18
bloganyes but make sure they don't break other tests22:25
madhu_aksure22:26
bloganits quite possible you may need updated version of sonething already in tempest/lib22:26
openstackgerritTrevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix the delete loadbalancer flow  https://review.openstack.org/18723722:38
*** TrevorV has quit IRC22:39
openstackgerritmin wang proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Admin_state_up tempest test for health monitor  https://review.openstack.org/17882723:15
*** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas23:35
openstackgerritmin wang proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Introduced tempest API tests for openstack/neutron-lbaas  https://review.openstack.org/16843923:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!