| *** bharath has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
| *** madhu_ak_ has quit IRC | 00:04 | |
| *** apuimedo has quit IRC | 00:14 | |
| *** xgerman_ has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
| *** apuimedo has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:42 | |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
| *** Tango has quit IRC | 01:11 | |
| *** apuimedo has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
| *** haigang has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:15 | |
| *** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:32 | |
| *** apuimedo has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:39 | |
| *** kbyrne has quit IRC | 02:05 | |
| *** kbyrne has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:10 | |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:31 | |
| *** haigang has quit IRC | 02:58 | |
| *** xgerman has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:01 | |
| *** xgerman has quit IRC | 03:13 | |
| *** madhu_ak has quit IRC | 04:36 | |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 05:00 | |
| *** kiran-r has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:15 | |
| *** Tango has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:31 | |
| *** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:19 | |
| *** bharath has quit IRC | 06:32 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
| *** Tango has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
| *** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC | 08:51 | |
| *** smcgough has quit IRC | 10:20 | |
| *** kiran-r has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:18 | |
| *** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:26 | |
| *** Miouge has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
| *** Tango has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:48 | |
| *** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:18 | |
| *** xgerman has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:19 | |
| *** xgerman has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
| *** xgerman has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:22 | |
| *** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 15:30 | |
| *** blogan_ has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| *** TrevorV|Home has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:38 | |
| *** Miouge has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:40 | |
| *** john-davidge has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:47 | |
| john-davidge | blogan: ping | 15:48 |
|---|---|---|
| *** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:00 | |
| *** Miouge has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| *** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 16:22 | |
| *** mlavalle has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:30 | |
| *** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:40 | |
| *** blogan_ has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Trevor Vardeman proposed stackforge/octavia: Amphora SSH Driver https://review.openstack.org/160964 | 16:47 |
| TrevorV|Home | john-davidge, Not sure he saw this in time, it looks like his connection here just died. | 16:48 |
| *** TrevorV|Home has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
| *** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:58 | |
| *** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 17:12 | |
| *** blogan_ has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
| *** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:14 | |
| *** john-davidge has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
| Tango | Hello, I would like to confirm the version of LBaaS in the Kilo release. From the page http://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/devstack-with-lbaas-v2.html, it appears that Kilo will have V2. Does this mean that if I need V1, I would have to install it separately? | 17:18 |
| Tango | I am using Kubernetes which currently uses V1 API | 17:18 |
| Tango | From earlier chat on the IRC, V1 and V2 are mutually exclusive | 17:20 |
| blogan_ | Tango: v1 and v2 should both be installed if neutron-lbaas is installed | 17:38 |
| openstackgerrit | min wang proposed stackforge/octavia: Fix Octavia complexity issues https://review.openstack.org/177035 | 17:39 |
| Tango | blogan_: Thanks, there should be no problem with making V1 API call? | 17:39 |
| xgerman | they don't work at the same time | 17:41 |
| xgerman | you should only use v1 or v2 -- but not both at the same time | 17:42 |
| Tango | xgerman: OK, is there a config somewhere that enables V1? | 17:42 |
| xgerman | it's installed by default and the cleint will offer the options | 17:43 |
| xgerman | both options making it confusing for users | 17:43 |
| xgerman | you can sort of deactivate things in neutron.conf | 17:44 |
| Tango | xgerman: I see, so the user would specify the version on the CLI? | 17:44 |
| xgerman | there are commands called lb- and lbaas- | 17:44 |
| xgerman | lb is 1.0 and lbaas 2.0 | 17:44 |
| xgerman | so the user would need to know which ones to use | 17:44 |
| Tango | Right, that's the confusing part. | 17:45 |
| xgerman | yep | 17:45 |
| Tango | I had one devstack with V2 and the lb- command would return 404 Not Found | 17:45 |
| xgerman | in devstack you get lbaas v1 installed by default and you will have to edit neutron-conf to deactivate | 17:45 |
| xgerman | Tango, so you have 2.0 successfully installed ;-) | 17:46 |
| xgerman | that;s the expected beahavior | 17:46 |
| Tango | So if I pick up the Kilo release and follow the normal instruction, would I get V1 or V2 by default? | 17:47 |
| *** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 17:47 | |
| xgerman | if you are doing devstack you would end up with V1 which is part of the devstack repo whereas V2 devstack code is in our lbaas repo | 17:48 |
| xgerman | so getting V2 requires some extra work | 17:49 |
| Tango | OK perfect, that answers my question then. Thanks xgerman | 17:49 |
| xgerman | you are welcome | 17:50 |
| *** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:53 | |
| *** mwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:54 | |
| blogan_ | stupid time warner | 18:10 |
| blogan_ | thanks for answering his questions xgerman | 18:11 |
| *** TrevorV|Home has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:21 | |
| *** mwang2 has quit IRC | 18:24 | |
| *** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 18:34 | |
| *** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 18:50 | |
| *** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 18:56 | |
| *** TrevorV|Home has quit IRC | 18:59 | |
| *** bharath has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
| *** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:09 | |
| *** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 19:22 | |
| *** madhu_ak_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:22 | |
| *** madhu_ak has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
| *** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 19:43 | |
| *** mwang2 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:58 | |
| *** blogan_ has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| *** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:13 | |
| *** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 20:17 | |
| *** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 20:19 | |
| *** blogan_ has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | min wang proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Admin API tempest for healthmonitor https://review.openstack.org/173542 | 20:35 |
| *** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:40 | |
| *** blogan_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:46 | |
| *** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 20:47 | |
| *** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 20:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | min wang proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Introduced tempest API tests for openstack/neutron-lbaas https://review.openstack.org/168439 | 20:48 |
| *** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 20:57 | |
| xgerman | blogan - we need some sqlachemy help | 21:20 |
| xgerman | yt? | 21:21 |
| xgerman | especially the to_data_model is confusing us -- | 21:22 |
| xgerman | this is the test exposing the problem: | 21:23 |
| xgerman | https://gist.github.com/xgerman/8daed3f344887fed4697 | 21:23 |
| xgerman | fails line 17 | 21:24 |
| *** madhu_ak_ is now known as madhu_ak | 21:24 | |
| xgerman | rm_work? Is any of you there? | 21:26 |
| *** santosh_ns has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
| blogan_ | xgerman: im here, ill give it a look see | 22:29 |
| xgerman | thanks -- it seems that if you start the recursion in t_data_model at pool then it goes to listener then it own't do default_pool | 22:29 |
| blogan_ | xgerman: why can't you just use new_pool at that point? | 22:30 |
| xgerman | it's a test ;-) | 22:30 |
| xgerman | to expose https://gist.github.com/anonymous/a2fb712444ff06cd96a6 | 22:31 |
| blogan_ | xgerman: yeah the to_data_model method won't try to convert what you just came from bc then it'd get in an infinite recursion loop | 22:31 |
| xgerman | yes | 22:31 |
| blogan_ | if absolutely needed we can add in recursive max depth but that'll definitely complicate it even more (its already quite complicated) | 22:32 |
| xgerman | well, the work around would be to get the Pool; the xtract the listener.id; then get the listener | 22:32 |
| blogan_ | but you already have the listener | 22:33 |
| blogan_ | and the pool | 22:33 |
| xgerman | the pool might not be the dedault pool? Is that a valid case? | 22:35 |
| blogan_ | is that something that isn't possible? | 22:35 |
| blogan_ | right now the listener only has one pool | 22:35 |
| xgerman | yeah, so we should just assume that -- or make it future proof? | 22:35 |
| blogan_ | just assume it, when L7 comes around we'll have to make sure that still holds | 22:36 |
| blogan_ | though I'm thinking the pool model would be a child of an L7 rule/policy model, not the listener, but thats yet to be fleshed out | 22:36 |
| xgerman | ok, so for now: pool : listener is 1:1 | 22:40 |
| blogan_ | yep | 22:40 |
| blogan_ | xgerman: while you're here, i was looking at that review that improved the complexity of the octavia code | 22:42 |
| xgerman | yes | 22:42 |
| blogan_ | xgerman: i commented, not sure if you read it yet, but is that tool used in a lot of openstack products? | 22:42 |
| xgerman | I saw the comments -- I don't have any info on that | 22:43 |
| xgerman | I will be touching base with the other HP people (using the tool) next week -- | 22:43 |
| blogan_ | well like i said, i like the improvements, just have a minor concern on it forcing some style | 22:43 |
| xgerman | yeah, all tools do that | 22:44 |
| xgerman | and part of the exercise was to figure out to look at the quality of the tool's suggestions | 22:44 |
| blogan_ | yep, which is why i bring up the whole openstack thing, they definitely support using pep8,flake8 and all of that | 22:44 |
| blogan_ | well other than the staticmethods, suggestions looked good | 22:45 |
| blogan_ | pycharm's inspections will also suggest using staticmethod | 22:45 |
| xgerman | they probably all rely on the same open source inspection lib | 22:45 |
| blogan_ | yeah you're probably right | 22:47 |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | min wang proposed openstack/neutron-lbaas: Admin API tempest for healthmonitor https://review.openstack.org/173542 | 22:53 |
| *** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:03 | |
| *** bharath has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:06 | |
| *** bharath has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
| *** bharath has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:36 | |
| *** bharath has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
| *** bharath_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:58 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!