| *** sballe has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:04 | |
| *** sballe__ has quit IRC | 00:07 | |
| *** crc32 has quit IRC | 00:12 | |
| *** sballe has quit IRC | 00:12 | |
| *** HenryG_ is now known as HenryG | 00:16 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
| *** xgerman has quit IRC | 00:40 | |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
| *** Zebra has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:28 | |
| *** mlavalle has quit IRC | 01:53 | |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 02:15 | |
| sbalukoff | xgerman: Do you mean there's no major difference from before, or no major difference between running one and two processes? | 02:40 |
|---|---|---|
| sbalukoff | (Sorry-- if you hadn't noticed, I have a tendency to get pulled off onto other things for hours at a time. Yay for asynchronous communication. XD ) | 02:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Brandon Logan proposed a change to stackforge/octavia: Initial migration for database structure https://review.openstack.org/114671 | 03:34 |
| *** ptoohill-oo has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:06 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:13 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:19 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 05:21 | |
| *** Zebra has quit IRC | 05:39 | |
| *** Zebra has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:40 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:58 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 06:45 | |
| *** jschwarz has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:29 | |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 08:18 | |
| *** Zebra has quit IRC | 09:47 | |
| *** sqonkey has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:02 | |
| *** ptoohill-oo has quit IRC | 11:02 | |
| *** sqonkey has quit IRC | 12:10 | |
| *** ptoohill-oo has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:10 | |
| *** ptoohill-oo has quit IRC | 12:34 | |
| *** ptoohill-oo has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:36 | |
| *** sballe has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:39 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:05 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:09 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:14 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:15 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:19 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:23 | |
| *** woodster_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:31 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
| *** xgerman has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:58 | |
| *** mlavalle has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:04 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
| *** jorgem has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:35 | |
| blogan_ | hello to all | 16:07 |
| *** jschwarz has left #openstack-lbaas | 16:12 | |
| xgerman | hi | 16:13 |
| blogan_ | xgerman: you wanted an ERROR operating status? | 16:13 |
| xgerman | yes, you never know what causes irregular operations | 16:14 |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:15 | |
| blogan_ | wouldn't the degraded status be similar? | 16:15 |
| xgerman | DEGRADED is that the nodes are not reponding; ERROR is that the LB has issues | 16:16 |
| xgerman | or Listener, or | 16:16 |
| blogan_ | wouldn't that be what the provisioning status is for? | 16:16 |
| xgerman | well, if you provision am emtity to be ACTIVE, then after a while being active encounters an error... | 16:17 |
| blogan_ | im sure you're right, I just can't see the case where setting the operating status to ERROR would make much sense | 16:17 |
| xgerman | well, in Libra's case haproxy sometimes crashes, then we try to fail over, that fails for some reason, and then we set it to ERROR | 16:18 |
| blogan_ | i guess im not dileneating provisioning and operating status in my head properly | 16:18 |
| blogan_ | so provisioning status is a status that can only be changed by a user doing an action on an entity, and operating status will be a status that can be updated by the system | 16:19 |
| xgerman | that is how I look at it | 16:19 |
| xgerman | but I might be wrong | 16:19 |
| blogan_ | well if that is the case, then, load balancer should have an operating status | 16:19 |
| blogan_ | no I can definitely see how that makes sense | 16:20 |
| xgerman | yeah, but I am happy as long as there is a way to express ERROR | 16:20 |
| blogan_ | well it could be through the provisioning status field | 16:20 |
| blogan_ | but I'd like to get more people's opinions on it, i'm indifferent towards either | 16:21 |
| xgerman | yeah, more people is good -- I am leaning towards operational status since for me it feels ambiguious to have it provisioned correctly but getting an error because the CPU explodes | 16:22 |
| xgerman | ERROR in provisioning would indicate that I (the user have to do something) whereas in OPERATION the system might still self heal | 16:22 |
| xgerman | or even worse I the user did something wrong | 16:23 |
| blogan_ | yeah I think you're right | 16:24 |
| blogan_ | you've convinced me | 16:24 |
| *** sballe has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
| blogan_ | dont ever try that again | 16:25 |
| xgerman | let's wait for sbalukoff's contrarian view | 16:31 |
| *** sballe_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:31 | |
| blogan_ | xgerman: he may just agree with you | 16:31 |
| xgerman | :-) | 16:32 |
| *** sballe_ has quit IRC | 16:37 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:38 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
| *** balles has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:40 | |
| sbalukoff | I like the dileneation that provisioning status is triggered based on user actions (usually having to do with configuration changes), but operational status is triggered based on events within the system probably beyond the user's control. | 16:42 |
| sbalukoff | Do y'all ever see the potential for an provisional status to be ERROR, but the operational status to be UP? | 16:42 |
| sbalukoff | xgerman: Did you see my question to you last night about the benchmark data you've collected? | 16:44 |
| sbalukoff | When you said "there's no major difference" did you mean between the results with tuning and the result without tuning, or between the 1 process / 2 listeners approach and the 2 processes / 1 listener approach? | 16:45 |
| blogan_ | sbalukoff: I could definitely see a provisional status being ERROR and operational being UP if it isn't handled correctly | 16:46 |
| sbalukoff | blogan_: Say... in the case where the user tries to make a change, and this doesn't succeed but prior to pushing any changes out to the Octavia VMs? | 16:47 |
| blogan_ | as in haproxy starts on the VM, but for whatever reason, there is an error in the communication back to the controller | 16:47 |
| *** sballe_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:47 | |
| sbalukoff | blogan_: Aah. True. | 16:48 |
| xgerman | sbalukoff, no major difference between 2 processes/2 listeners -- thought he later has a lower error rate | 16:48 |
| sbalukoff | xgerman: Yeah, that's a little odd to me. It would be interesting to find out what the nature of those errors was. | 16:48 |
| blogan_ | sbalukoff: the case you just mentioned is much more likely | 16:48 |
| sbalukoff | Also, finding out how long you waited between runs can be helpful-- it's possible one of the machines in there was still working on cleaning up TIME_WAIT sockets from a previous run or something, which can lead to errors under high load. | 16:49 |
| xgerman | yeah, I figured it was nothing to be too worried about | 16:50 |
| xgerman | I also looked at CPU/MEM during the runs and that was far away from the max | 16:50 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:51 | |
| sbalukoff | xgerman: Ok. I assume you're going to be at tomorrow's Octavia meeting, right? It would be great to go over the results of your benchmarks and try for consensus around the 1 listener per haproxy vs. 1 loadbalancer per haproxy direction, eh. | 16:52 |
| xgerman | we are also under new management (Marc I.) so we are rethinking our position on that question... | 16:52 |
| sbalukoff | Oh, ok. | 16:52 |
| xgerman | yep, will be there and we can go over it | 16:52 |
| sbalukoff | xgerman: Did that happen in this last week? | 16:52 |
| xgerman | yeah, he just started :-) | 16:53 |
| sbalukoff | Wow! | 16:53 |
| sbalukoff | Ok, well, cool. I hope he's good to work with, eh! | 16:53 |
| xgerman | he is three levels above me but very passionate about LBaaS | 16:53 |
| sballe_ | He is great! he knows jorgem very well :) is used to be at Rackspace | 16:53 |
| sbalukoff | Nice! | 16:54 |
| sballe_ | s/is/he | 16:54 |
| xgerman | yeah, +1 he is great and knows LBaaS inside/out | 16:54 |
| sballe_ | I am just sitting and listening in the background. I am still ctaching up from my vacation in Denmark | 16:54 |
| sbalukoff | sballe_: Yeah, I was out for the last few days too-- trying to make sure I have my action items taken care of prior to tomorrow's meeting. XD | 16:55 |
| blogan_ | are we doing irc meeting tomorrow? | 16:55 |
| sbalukoff | Speaking of which, if y'all haven't started reviewing the v0.5 design, or blogan's proposed DB migrations, please do so today! | 16:55 |
| sbalukoff | blogan_: Yes, I'll send an agenda out in a few hours. | 16:56 |
| blogan_ | I need to make one more change, per xgerman's suggestion | 16:56 |
| xgerman | cool. | 16:56 |
| sbalukoff | blogan_: Sounds good. | 16:56 |
| sballe_ | +1 | 16:56 |
| sbalukoff | Oh! Does anyone know if we need to do anything special in this IRC channel to use the openstack bots here to run a meeting? | 16:58 |
| sbalukoff | I guess I can look into that today, eh. | 16:59 |
| blogan_ | i have no idea on that one | 17:01 |
| blogan_ | i assume the first thing we need is an open time slot | 17:01 |
| blogan_ | and maybe thats all we need | 17:01 |
| blogan_ | seems like they would have some kind of central registrar to lock in time slots though | 17:01 |
| sbalukoff | Yeah... I'll be trying to find documentation on this somewhere. I'm hoping just having the IRC bots here means they're ready for running meetings. | 17:03 |
| sbalukoff | Heck, let me try something | 17:03 |
| sbalukoff | #startmeeting Octavia | 17:03 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 26 17:03:41 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sbalukoff. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 17:03 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 17:03 |
| sbalukoff | Awesome | 17:03 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' | 17:03 |
| sbalukoff | #endmeeting | 17:03 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 26 17:03:48 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:03 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/octavia/2014/octavia.2014-08-26-17.03.html | 17:03 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/octavia/2014/octavia.2014-08-26-17.03.txt | 17:03 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/octavia/2014/octavia.2014-08-26-17.03.log.html | 17:03 |
| sbalukoff | FASTEST MEETING EVER! | 17:03 |
| sbalukoff | And now, my research is done, and I've saved myself probably an hour or two. XD | 17:04 |
| sbalukoff | Ok, since this channel was created at the same time the Octavia project was birthed (at the mid-cycle summit), and no other meetings happen here... I think having the meeting here probably makes the most sense. | 17:05 |
| sbalukoff | Anyway, I'll be sending out notifications about it to the mailing list in a few hours. | 17:05 |
| sbalukoff | In the mean time, I've got to go AFK for a couple hours. | 17:05 |
| sbalukoff | BBIAB | 17:06 |
| blogan_ | sweet | 17:11 |
| *** crc32 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:48 | |
| dougwig | there goes sbalukoff again, finding new ways to make octavia meetings exclusive. keeping them open for less than a second doesn't allow anyone to type. i think we need a ML thread about this. | 18:14 |
| *** sballe__ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:17 | |
| *** sballe_ has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
| *** xgerman has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
| *** xgerman has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:23 | |
| balles | dougwig, lol | 18:23 |
| *** balles has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
| *** balles has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:25 | |
| *** xgerman has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:02 | |
| rm_work | sbalukoff: sounds good to me | 20:00 |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:03 | |
| *** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:51 | |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
| *** sbfox1 has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:55 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** barclaac has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:15 | |
| *** barclaac has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
| *** barclaac has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:31 | |
| barclaac | join #openstack-neutron | 21:31 |
| barclaac | wrong window :-D | 21:31 |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
| *** xgerman has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:42 | |
| *** sbfox has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:42 | |
| *** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:44 | |
| *** sbfox has quit IRC | 21:46 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:54 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:56 | |
| rm_work | whoops, think I missed saying hi to Dustin and Craig >_> | 22:05 |
| sbalukoff | Oh, did they head out already? | 22:10 |
| *** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:20 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 22:23 | |
| rm_work | guessing so, thing ended at 5pm | 22:26 |
| blogan_ | they didn't even try to come see us :( | 22:27 |
| blogan_ | sbalukoff why do they hate us? | 22:27 |
| blogan_ | why? | 22:27 |
| *** sbfox1 has quit IRC | 22:30 | |
| *** sballe_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:32 | |
| *** barclaac|2 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:35 | |
| *** sballe__ has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
| *** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:38 | |
| *** sballe_ has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
| *** sbfox2 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:41 | |
| *** sbfox1 has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
| *** barclaac has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
| *** mlavalle has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
| *** sballe has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:44 | |
| *** HenryG has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
| *** sballe has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
| *** barclaac|2 has quit IRC | 22:55 | |
| *** barclaac|2 has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:55 | |
| sbalukoff | blogan_: Well, it's all I can do to stand y'all. ;) | 22:59 |
| sbalukoff | Seriously though-- that is odd. I guess they must have had to get to the airport in a hurry. | 22:59 |
| sbalukoff | I know Dustin really wanted to talk with your network people about how Octavia is going to plug in there. | 23:00 |
| xgerman | sbalukoff, for the agenda tomorrow: You know our disagreement about rendering haproxy config files in the controller vs. on the haproxy machine | 23:06 |
| xgerman | I am wondering if we can discuss that at the meeting also | 23:06 |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
| crc32 | So was the meeting going to be on IRC or WebEX? | 23:10 |
| blogan_ | crc32: IRC for the next couple of weeks, then re-evaluate | 23:15 |
| xgerman | yeah, the irc party one | 23:19 |
| xgerman | won | 23:19 |
| *** sbfox2 has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
| *** fnaval_ has quit IRC | 23:34 | |
| *** Zebra has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:43 | |
| *** jorgem has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!